Great video. Way over-priced for us to see them reg. in our sky's in my lifetime. When they only have $10K or $15K worth of parts in them. Lets face it . They are crappy cars and crappy aircraft for the money. You be better off buying a Lamborghini or buying a regular ultralight airplane. To bad because these are the things of dreams but in America they must first be the things of greed. I understand growth but who has hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on "depreciating" toys ? ANSWER: Only rich people and not middle-class people either.
Thank you. The first cars were also a luxury item, until Ford reduced the cost of production significantly. It will be the same with EVTOLs in 10 years. It is necessary to establish mass production, build a new infrastructure, coordinate regulation, wait for high-capacity batteries...
@@TopBoxyI hope so. My fear is they will keep everyone believing that it's not necessary because we already have ground transport for 'commoners.' At least, that seems like the argument for not already having done it, when it's definitely possible. The best argument I can think of FOR it, is that it could cut down the time and cost of commuting to work. What confuses me is how people I know laugh at the very idea, as if we are making too much of ourselves to think it's possible- when not only is it possible, it's already happening if you have a fat enough wallet.
Why didn't you mention the Pop-Up concept of Airbus and Italdesign (Audi)? This design seems to be the most sophisticated and offers door-to-door transport in a single comfortable cabin that can be driven on the road on an EV chassis like a normal electric car. For air transport the cabin is lifted from the chassis by an automatic drone for fast regional transport. To cover larger distances the cabin fits inside the Hyperloop train. th-cam.com/video/ZaKD6LYj5eE/w-d-xo.html
The troubles with EV are already evident. Cost: Too expensive (150K-300K); Travel time: Longer than driving there in a gasoline powered car - (a 5 hr charge every 100 miles of flight time= 600 miles in 30 hours); Hazards: EV batteries explode when wet; Health hazard - intense radiation from EMIs, -batteries vulnerable to being turned off immediately by external forces.
Very professional, lifelike and diligently inspired. Please do more independent focuses on each VTOL! Likely I'll utilize it well when 2029 arrives! Thanks again & a gain! ✈️ 🚁
OK, so 99 % of cars have 1 person in them.... My concept of the perfect flying car is a "snap on snap off" 1 person 3 wheel lite weight electric golf cart with separate top fitting snap one drone. When you get close to where you need to go you can un snap the cart and go where you want to go. You own the cart but the drone is rented. Keep the cost low and let the drone attachment recharge. You will not get the same one back each time. Lots of city Drone Ports and one at your house. 99% of people can afford it....! Keep it simple...... use what we have....
I have to ask obvious question does anybody worry about the blades I mean how do you get in these things with the blades hitting you ? The open blades that seem dangerous on landing it without killing somebody on the ground ?
Air One is NOT capable of gliding, beware !! And its rudders may look cool but do not work either. The Axe by Skyfly is a kit - which the buyer builds or has an engineer finish - and so qualifies under the kit built certification regimes of US/UK etc - meaning less onerous and shorter certification route than "commercial" which will take years and hundreds of millions. The Air one is double the weight and needs double the power compared to the Axe - so the Air one is much less believable - because it will need twice the battery capacity. It's rotors only and does not benefit from lift from wings, like the Axe does. Result: Air one uses 250kw all the time to keep 2 passengers and its own (heavy!) weight in the air ......... against the tiny 30 kw of energy the Axe by Skyfly needs - and that's where the long range of 1 hours fully electric and 3 hours with hybrid petrol generator comes in. You might want to swap your refundable deposit of your air one to the axe by skyfly..... Also the Axe is designed by renowned and proven engineer Bill Brooks - over 2,000 of aircraft of his 19 designs are flying today .... against the Air one designed by a graphic designer with no aeronautical engineering degree ......
Thanks for the useful information. AXE really looks like a more practical solution to the todays problem of transportation, especially taking into account the current low battery density, but a different approach is a more pleasant appearance of the product, more comfortable, with easier operation. And in 10 years, when all certifications have been completed and mass production has been established, when battery density increases and its price drops, the next generation of AIRONE can perhaps be bought for an annual salary, as a premium alternative to EVTOL from IKEA ))
I'm a astral traveler and I see the future, there's a different of flying cars and they are beautiful and fast.. And also they are suit that if you wear you can fly, but only police can have those suit. The flyingsuit are faster than a flying car.
@@canaanhagemeister2583 But for the 'content' creator, the point of using the word 'flying cars' is the same as it has been for publications since cars were invented: to sucker in people to purchase their publications. Nowadays that has evolved into the internet and its plethora of clickbait titles and videos. Don't call it a flying car unless that's what it is. It's like you saying the point of your comment is that it feels like a sentence, even though you use zero capitalisation and no punctuation. Sort of looks like a sentence, but it's not. I have no problem with the content, just the idea that they're taking their potential viewers for fools (which they are, in many cases, but that is besides the point.) Cheers, D.
Great video. Way over-priced for us to see them reg. in our sky's in my lifetime. When they only have $10K or $15K worth of parts in them. Lets face it . They are crappy cars and crappy aircraft for the money. You be better off buying a Lamborghini or buying a regular ultralight airplane. To bad because these are the things of dreams but in America they must first be the things of greed. I understand growth but who has hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on "depreciating" toys ? ANSWER: Only rich people and not middle-class people either.
Thank you. The first cars were also a luxury item, until Ford reduced the cost of production significantly. It will be the same with EVTOLs in 10 years. It is necessary to establish mass production, build a new infrastructure, coordinate regulation, wait for high-capacity batteries...
@@TopBoxyI hope so. My fear is they will keep everyone believing that it's not necessary because we already have ground transport for 'commoners.' At least, that seems like the argument for not already having done it, when it's definitely possible. The best argument I can think of FOR it, is that it could cut down the time and cost of commuting to work. What confuses me is how people I know laugh at the very idea, as if we are making too much of ourselves to think it's possible- when not only is it possible, it's already happening if you have a fat enough wallet.
Well that qualifies as a rambling diatribe.
Bad piggies theme song plays
Why didn't you mention the Pop-Up concept of Airbus and Italdesign (Audi)? This design seems to be the most sophisticated and offers door-to-door transport in a single comfortable cabin that can be driven on the road on an EV chassis like a normal electric car. For air transport the cabin is lifted from the chassis by an automatic drone for fast regional transport. To cover larger distances the cabin fits inside the Hyperloop train.
th-cam.com/video/ZaKD6LYj5eE/w-d-xo.html
Mentioned in another video - th-cam.com/video/MbPPS9UTogE/w-d-xo.html
The idea is interesting, but it didn’t go beyond the prototype...
The troubles with EV are already evident. Cost: Too expensive (150K-300K); Travel time: Longer than driving there in a gasoline powered car - (a 5 hr charge every 100 miles of flight time= 600 miles in 30 hours); Hazards: EV batteries explode when wet; Health hazard - intense radiation from EMIs, -batteries vulnerable to being turned off immediately by external forces.
Thank you, excellent work !!
Thank you too!
Сплошные концепты 😒😒😒
It is not so simple, the “owners” must have to take pilot license and it is expensive and takes time. Besides of that a regulation must be approved.
Belweather looks amazing but definitely needs work. As an air vehicle it must travel faster than a car and remain maneuverable.
Great point!
Very professional, lifelike and diligently inspired. Please do more independent focuses on each VTOL! Likely I'll utilize it well when 2029 arrives! Thanks again & a gain! ✈️ 🚁
Thank you
OK, so 99 % of cars have 1 person in them.... My concept of the perfect flying car is a "snap on snap off" 1 person 3 wheel lite weight electric golf cart with separate top fitting snap one drone. When you get close to where you need to go you can un snap the cart and go where you want to go. You own the cart but the drone is rented. Keep the cost low and let the drone attachment recharge. You will not get the same one back each time. Lots of city Drone Ports and one at your house. 99% of people can afford it....! Keep it simple...... use what we have....
Really nice idea!
The problem with all electric aircraft currently is the short flight time.
Yes, you are absolutely right
I have to ask obvious question does anybody worry about the blades I mean how do you get in these things with the blades hitting you ? The open blades that seem dangerous on landing it without killing somebody on the ground ?
Good question. In any case, the flying machine undergoes safety protocols. Logically, this problem can be solved
that is a smart question I didn't even think about that😅
It’s a pretty obvious danger. You’re walking up to a vehicle with a food processor blade at each corner.
Range anxiety😅😅😅😅😅 it's 240 miles from Houston to Dallas all of these are useless in the USA
Challenge accepted!😅
If it has propellers it's not a car but a drone 🐪 . Need something that defies gravity. 😂
What about teleportation?
Air One is NOT capable of gliding, beware !! And its rudders may look cool but do not work either. The Axe by Skyfly is a kit - which the buyer builds or has an engineer finish - and so qualifies under the kit built certification regimes of US/UK etc - meaning less onerous and shorter certification route than "commercial" which will take years and hundreds of millions. The Air one is double the weight and needs double the power compared to the Axe - so the Air one is much less believable - because it will need twice the battery capacity. It's rotors only and does not benefit from lift from wings, like the Axe does. Result: Air one uses 250kw all the time to keep 2 passengers and its own (heavy!) weight in the air ......... against the tiny 30 kw of energy the Axe by Skyfly needs - and that's where the long range of 1 hours fully electric and 3 hours with hybrid petrol generator comes in. You might want to swap your refundable deposit of your air one to the axe by skyfly..... Also the Axe is designed by renowned and proven engineer Bill Brooks - over 2,000 of aircraft of his 19 designs are flying today .... against the Air one designed by a graphic designer with no aeronautical engineering degree ......
Thanks for the useful information. AXE really looks like a more practical solution to the todays problem of transportation, especially taking into account the current low battery density, but a different approach is a more pleasant appearance of the product, more comfortable, with easier operation. And in 10 years, when all certifications have been completed and mass production has been established, when battery density increases and its price drops, the next generation of AIRONE can perhaps be bought for an annual salary, as a premium alternative to EVTOL from IKEA ))
Haven’t watch this all yet. But do we want just anyone being able to drive around in these? Hell no!
Why not control the flight yourself in wild places? Otherwise, we'll miss all the fun)
Where can I get them all
We are not representatives of these companies.
Cyclotech sounds promising. I hope it takes off.
It should
Anti gravity works better but good luck releasing that
Even better is teleportation)
I'm a astral traveler and I see the future, there's a different of flying cars and they are beautiful and fast.. And also they are suit that if you wear you can fly, but only police can have those suit. The flyingsuit are faster than a flying car.
Thanks for the information provided
What happened to Dr. Muller's AirCar?
If I only had these people funding! Ive seen my ideas used already (in part)
Copters and jets are noisy. If someday one of them used to fly commercially, then we must prepare our self to have more noisy surrounding.
:) you can get used to everything
Cyclotech CruiseUp's definitely a new invention. I hope it goes into mass production soon
No earlier than 2030
How will people deal with restricted airspace?
It'll be programmed into the flight controllers.
Evtols will not let you enter air space, which is how you get away with not needing a pilots license
Cool video!!! thanks😊
Thanks for watching!
😊
😮 Very nice for mountain regions. But range... still waiting for good batteries...
Yes, true
Long time no see.
Thinking of how bad people drive in vehicles with four wheels on the ground -- it's easy to see problems.
Thanks for the tip
Bellissimo video delle macchine volanti !
Give Lorenz Motors some love
As I understand it, there is nothing to love yet except the design project? Good luck with your investment search!
I like the flying cars better😊❤
Better than what?
@@TopBoxy better than the one you drive on the road 🛣️😜
ASKA A5
❤❤❤❤❤
Elon musk will do it….
Will he do what?
Not good enough
Which one?
Tesla roadster😭😭😭
Glad you watched to the end )
Such an unexpected delight & humorous! 😂❤🎉
They're not cars. This is clickbait.
I heard that ,click,click,click click!!!!
the point of them is to feel like flying cars
@@canaanhagemeister2583 But for the 'content' creator, the point of using the word 'flying cars' is the same as it has been for publications since cars were invented: to sucker in people to purchase their publications. Nowadays that has evolved into the internet and its plethora of clickbait titles and videos. Don't call it a flying car unless that's what it is. It's like you saying the point of your comment is that it feels like a sentence, even though you use zero capitalisation and no punctuation. Sort of looks like a sentence, but it's not. I have no problem with the content, just the idea that they're taking their potential viewers for fools (which they are, in many cases, but that is besides the point.) Cheers, D.