I never considered Yang as a legitimate candidate before. But I'm slowly changing my mind on that. I think he is thoughtful, well spoken and thinks things through before he speaks.. and that's just a few of the many things I am liking about him. I think he should run again.
Back in the run up to 2020, what excluded him from legitimacy in your perception? Certainly you were not alone in that. Also, did you have candidates at the time besides the guy who won who did appear legitimate? What were the factors that informed your perception?
@@brockmiller574 I'm curious on this as well. I was a big Yang supporter and it's always interesting to hear how ppl outside of my bubble perceived him
Hmm, so what happened? Decided to take off your ideological blinders and decided to listen for a change? Gross. Maybe don't vote until you decide to start listening 100% of the time? Thanks in advance!
The transition from Yang talking about the millions of jobs about to disappear and the question about the hat is like something out of the Hunger Games.
I actually agree, but probably for different reasons than you. She never said a true word that she thought, except showing that she was so woke that she HAD to assert her pro-Palestinians/anti-Israel into the Israel argument. As a Jewish Dem, I hate having to listen to self-hating Jews. But all that aside, every answer she gave was extremely political and CAREFUL. Too afraid that people might hate to hear what she really thinks.
@@jbjacobs9514 Ah that's an interesting take, with the criticism of her pro Palestinian line. I'm curious how ppl feel about Slotkin on here, especially given that she's now running for the Senate
It clearly was. I would say inconsiderate is an even more accurate word. However I agree with Noa that it also wasn't worth using as a question on Overtime.
I like Andrew Yang. He studies a topic before he speaks of it. In my opinion he would be a good senator. I would vote for him and I'm a registered Republican.
That lady at the Oscars is problematic of a bigger problem. People simply not caring about their fellow citizens. It's minor for the moment, but it's a major problem across the country.
@@robertpolanco1973 I'm not gonna vote for either. He's not far from them either. Just bc I don't like Biden and Trump, It doesn't mean I'm gonna vote for their love child. It's this mind set that got us in this mess. We have made it so easy for any candidate to get elected as long as they hate someone we hate. push comes to shove, Yang is voting for himself and the democrats.
@@RasTona_ Yang is NOT a Democrat in any way because he is more of a third-party alternative! Furthermore, EVERY politician in this country votes for himself/herself anyway for many decades, too!
@@robertpolanco1973 He's NOT a democrat in anyway?? He ran on their ticket, and on the same episode he was pleading with biden to give other democrats like himself a chance. "Third party" means different from party 1 and party2. There's no such thing as a "more of a third party". Just come-out and say " we are 3rd party, this is our plan........" but thanks for admitting Yang is all about himself just like other politicians. So why do we need more of just like the other politicians?
What I wanted to ask is what if they put another person of color with an even more broadly feathered and fanned out elaborate outfit in front of her?????
Overworked Land surveyor here, My career is one of those Jobs that is absolutely critical to all construction and mapping services. 15 years Experience and I am done, I found myself working harder as i got older and its not because I am aging in reverse. My company could not find any hires and the ones they do find are worthless. I had to go around fixing everything they did, taking time out of my own work. We were literally operating crews messing everything up and the old crews that fix all those mistakes. Forced to work 6 day work weeks and 10 hour days, my father passed away without hardly seeing me because of my work schedule. Calling me jaded is a understatement.
If you're in such high demand then push back against the "Man". I'm a network engineer and we're in much the same predicament. The schools churn out discombobulated young people with poor social skills who can't/won't do the job. More than half of them leave the field in the first two years. The rest of us who can do this get to call the shots. I hand pick my clients and say "No" all the time. There is a labor shortage in this country that's only getting worse.
If what you state is true then you should absolutely bring it up to your managers and bosses. Tell them about the extra work you need to put in. Do NOT work for free quietly and complain on the side. Seriously from what youve said it sounds like you offer a lot more to the company and deserve to be paid more.
Every time I listen to Andrew Yang I'm really impressed. I wish his Forward party luck as America could really benefit from a healthy 3rd political party. BTW most democracies have multiple political parties that offers more choice and helps reduce that bipartisan tribal edge that now consumes America. My family are duel citizen, Canadian and American and I've always wondered why the American public tolerate having just two political parties while they can go to a Walmart and choose 8 different kinds of Yogurt at the Grocery store.
I'm not sure about every democratic country, or Canada for that matter. But seems to me there's only 2 parties in the UK. Labor and Tories. The only ones who seem to get power. The US has more than 2 parties, but only the 2 major parties hold the power. Same thing no?
Maybe in 2027, the country and world is going through too much shit right now, a second term for Biden means he comes with experience and we don't need someone coming in with a learning curve right now. Let Biden also continue steering the country to the left more.
Rep Slotkin has a few good points, but she is completely wrong about a third party. A third party would NOT be an extreme party; it would be the moderates from both parties. We all are tried of the extremes in BOTH parties. We also have a new appreciation for Andrew Yang.
Everytime I see Yang come back to the public spotlight, he is still consistently addressing the actual REAL issues in America. He was right about everything and points out we're wasting time everyday fighting battles between extreme Democrats and Republicans and getting further divided and further from solving our problems more effectively. Someone please get this awesome man in office! 🙌
As lil Andy yang ATTACKS " get rid of Trump" yet Yang is eatin up with abscessed TDS...Attacking and creating the great divide towards HONEST AMERICANS that support the finest POTUS ever in the history of the USA. T R U M P ..as an independent I voted for Hillary and Obama... HUGEE mistake.. someday perhaps you will see the light ..Go WOKE Go Broke !
It will be when the elections come up. Then it will be "Biden's fault" for not stopping AI from advancing or some shit. People always find the way to blame the president, even though it's the corporations that obviously run the show.
Americans work in call centers??? Every time I call for customer service I get somebody from a country that I can't understand what they're saying. Most are from India.
True. In my job in IT I've had to place a lot of calls to call centers over the last 20 or so years. Used to be you would get a majority of American's on the other end of the line. In the last 8 or so years I can't remember the last time I spoke to an American. Vast majority are Indian with a smattering of Phillipinos.
would love a chance to vote for him in the primary, and even if he doesnt win, i may end up writing his name in anyway. Im getting tired of going with the worse choice because theyre more popular.
Because he's a rich guy who would benefit from automation. I doubt anyone in his immediate family will lose a job to a machine so of course he's ok with it.
@@noire.blackheart Where did he gaslight anyone? CS jobs will be the first to fall. I got laid off from a CS job last year. We got replaced by a chat bot.
The same procedure is used by an OB/GYN to treat an ectopic pregnancy as a doctor would use to provide an elective abortion...and states like Idaho will now charge doctors with a crime if they execute this procedure, regardless of reason. Ectopic pregnancies, if not terminated, can be fatal to women.
Please provide the name of this Idaho law, and the chapter and section number where it defines what an abortion is. Every reference I have found specifically exempts ectopic pregnancy and misarrange treatments.
Andrew needs to work on spicing up his own podcast again but I know he has been too busy. 😕 Did you know that a #YangGang meme is how we got Ke Huy Kwon back into acting with Everything Everywhere All at Once?
Pro life is a religious belief. Prove to me that it’s not a violation of separation of church (beliefs) and state! Forcing a religious belief on the country is a flat out violation of the separation of church and state!
“Caring about human life is a religious belief. How dare you make murder illegal!” I get that it’s not that simple, but everything about how we treat people comes back to our fundamental beliefs about the world (whether religious or humanist or whatever other term that gets at the basic philosophy you live your life based on). There are atheists that oppose abortion. My opposition of third-trimester and hesitancy about second-trimester abortion comes from my psychology classes where we talked about how fetuses do encode memory in the womb (the closest standard we have to personhood, unless you are going to claim that the average baby does not achieve personhood until 2 years of age and some people with various disabilities never reach personhood, both ideas that I reject, largely because of my religion).
@@marvinmartin4692 extreme by what measure? Roman father's could kill their underaged kids. That was only 1500 years ago. Our government is in part based on Rome. What determines ethics? If culture promotes an ideal how is it wrong?
As an Arab-American, I have an issue with the anti-Zionism equating anti-Semitism. If I was to question the reasons for the establishment of the United States in this country (feathering and tarring British, slavery, Native American suffering), that doesn’t make me anti-American. It makes me critical of certain origin issues that the US had a hand in without wishing ill will to the US as a nation presently. One can still have a healthy conversation of some of the issues of how Israel started as a country at the expense of Palestinians (the result of Zionist passions) without necessarily wishing for the dismantling of a whole legitimate nation in its present form. There should be freedom of a healthy discussion on this so that we can right the wrongs of the past, which is what makes the US such a great nation today, in that we admit not every origin story is black and white, and some problems associated with the origins of nations and the philosophical foundations of that establishment should be criticized for the betterment of the nations. And what a wonderful world it would be for an Israel who can admit that Zionism has its dark side (as well as its justifications) and that Israel can be a better place for its Arab citizens today for that freedom to discuss and right the wrongs of that dark side while praising its accomplishments.
No one is saying that discussing the conflict in israel is antisemitism just that delegitimise the existence of israel and the right of the jews to national definition is antisemitism
@@noa-wu9sn I fear that when one speaks “against Zionism” while supporting the right for Israel to exist as a nation gets misconstrued in this debate as “anti-Semitic”. I just wanted to put it out there a lot of people in this world do not differentiate between Zionism and the conflicts. And I figured I’d make an analogy to the founding of the US to make it clear why it shouldn’t be “anti-Semitic”.
Shame that ChatGPT got glossed over. AI is a HUGE threat and also an extremely important tool we’ll want to develop and Yang could have directly connected it to UBI which we all will probably need.
As a programmer these discussions about "AI" are killing me - ChatGPT and other LLM's are not even remotely close to AGI, we need to be clearer about what we're discussing because otherwise it's prone to misinterpretation or exploitation. If you start off the discussion talking about "AI" I just instantly assume you have no idea what you're talking about.
@@hew195050 What most people are now calling "AI" is really just an extremely large language model which performs inference calculations. It's just extremely fine-tuned by humans to produce what we would expect. It's actually kind of scary how well some of this has worked, like a lot of us don't really understand why training it on certain datasets has worked so well.
Most people think of a strong AI when talking about AIs, however, any system that can use pattern recognition in order to generate new, topic relevant content, can be considered an AI. Moreover, defining AI aside, chatGPT has a major influence on the Junior developer job market. Sadly it is a problem, and as these technology and others like it continue to develop, it will effect more and more people.
The problem we have with the job market and the labor force is that we have a ton of open jobs that pay crap and treat workers like garbage, but companies are unwilling to change so they just claim "nobody wants to work" Then we have many open jobs for skilled workers, but there's a shortage of those workers because nobody has those skills. We can blame the education system, but we also need to blame companies because they won't train or groom anyone. They expect someone to walk in and have little to no onboarding and just get right to it. Then finally, we have lots of jobs out there open, people could do them, they pay well, but companies have these horrendously broken recruiting systems that drag things out forever and ever to actually finally hire somebody, and then they come in to a toxic workplace and want to leave very quickly. The reality is that too many companies had it too good when we had an overabundance of people and a shortage of jobs. It's sad even that some companies want to go back to that. The writing was on the wall after the pandemic, but companies are just living in denial and still claiming that "culture" and "in-person collaboration" are the big things, when they are not. They also still won't pay a living wage that somebody in those vicinities can live on. That, or they won't let these people be remote and go live someplace where they can afford to live on that salary. So now they want to bring in AI and just replace more people. What's going to happen when now you have a plethora of population unable to afford to buy anything? I guarantee those same companies are then going to be lobbying the government to set up socialist programs and pay these companies taxpayer money to basically give out their goods or services.
Great response by Elissa Slotkin! Noa had nothing to say about everyone always screaming anti-semitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people 👍
Who has ever screamed antisemitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people, what are their names? This boring talking point about "It's not antisemitic to criticize the policies of the Israeli government" is a straw man argument. Who has ever said that?
As a person that has recently setup a call center, i agree they are getting cut. After covid they cut back 80% and I had to pack up and move a lot of that same equipment.
People decided that manual labor job opportunities are many times more physically demanding and people decided after the covid lock downs those positions though many times pay well don't have overall benefits including insurance and retirement programs that support the amount of physically associated ailments that obviously come with manual labor job opportunities and so many people fell for the myth that it's better to stay home than work
@@sharonhamilton3439 People won't be king makers anymore when they only get peanuts. The Corps need labor more than laborers need jobs. We hold the power, but are just too self-interested to ever get collectively organized. UNIONS! People fell for the "right to work" myth 35 years ago.
If Dems actually cared about abortion rights the way they say they do, why didn't they pass federal legislation any of the times in the last 50 years that they had control of the executive and legislative?
That's only acceptable way this ever could be done. 1) Roe v Wade was bullshit and deserved to be struck. 2) The people want legal abortion. 3) Then write and pass a goddamn law, this is a democracy! If you can't pass the law, then you can't pass the law. That's how our system works and that's exactly how it should work.
The most immediate problem with AI is that the capitalist system is not set up for handling it. That AI does a lot of work for us should be a good thing because it means in general we all have to work less. But if the AI is owned by the rich capitalists it means a few people will gain the benefits of that increased production and a lot of people will get nothing.
True, but he's learned to hold back, submissively agree to a certain point, as a result of what all he's dealt with and dealing with since he entered politics. In the end that's a mentally unstable enforced way to keep getting the completely insane way. I thought that he would have made a great mayor of New York City, in every way, all of his innovative ideas, including his good management to be able to carry them out, and look what have gotten instead, the whole state of New York. Shameless dunces, corrupted to the core. That's what pleases Oligarchy Globalists psychopaths. If successful, he could have set a precedent for other important cities to follow in The USA, especially blue cities in most dire and drastic systemic need of change.
@@anaibarangan4908 I learned how deeply corrupted the NYC political system is by following Yang's mayoral run. It's crazy the amount of manipulation and favor trading that happened during that election. There is a lot of interest in keeping NYC corrupt. It's easier to buy out career politicians.
Its probably the most important topic globally at this current moment, alongside the environment. Yang was proved right far quicker than anyone imagined.
I wish he talked more policy and explained how he thinks the Forward Party is going to fix the broken 2-party system that benefits more from NOT solving issues. Leaving abortion rights in limbo meant it could be a voter issue in every election. That turned out terribly.
@@faceplants2 I can fill in as a member of the Forward Party. His intention is to build the movement/party from the ground up instead of top-down. As such, the Forward Party's current focus is local elections not big ticket ones. Also the chief party policy positions are currently ranked choice voting, open primaries, and multi-member districts. Rank choice voting seeks to reduce the spoiler effect (also known as voting for the lesser of two evils). It allows people to vote for who they actually want, while still ensuring if their candidate isn't viable for a chance to win their vote will still be counted towards their preference of candidates. Expected impacts are reduced negative political attacks (since they lose their value in a ranked choice voting system) and initial cost both in funds/time to retrofit voting procedures/systems. Alaska currently uses this system successfully. Open primaries look to reduce the level of extremism present in both major political parties. By making the primaries of both Democrats and Republicans open to public vote by all, the candidates unacceptable to one of the camps are unlikely to achieve a nomination. This should result in more moderate candidates overall and more bipartisan agreement. This idea is common in Europe. Multi-member districts is really a stretch goal (the first two are likely to succeed, the multi-member district idea is still not quite ready for passage). The idea is that we triple the number of politicians in both the house and senate but keep the number of districts the same. Instead of districts having 1 candidate, they will have 3 each. Those 3 will be the 3 highest ranking in voting using the rank choice voting system. As such, in red districts we would expect 2 Republicans and an Independent; In blue districts we would expect 2 Democrats and an Independent; and in contested or "purple" districts, we would expect 1 Republican, 1 Democrat, and 1 Independent. This should result in a more responsive government (3 times as many folks representing each person means more availability for responses) and a political body that is more a true representation of the American people (ex: Republicans in blue districts, and Democrats in red districts would get better representation). This would also nearly kill Gerrymandering as it would lose its usefulness in a multi-member district (At best Gerrymandering could only determine who was 1st and 2nd pick, not whether a candidate is elected or not).
I'm a member of the Forward Party, but I'm losing faith in our ability to reform this system without some dripping red meat to hold out in front of voters.
Sadly I think the extreme brokenness of the system after 2024 will have to be the red meat to get it done, I wish the voters could be proactive enough to get it done before dire circumstances give us no choice but apparently that isn’t how most are wired but I applaud the Forward Party trying to give us an option to move a little faster with those reforms
It turns out we didn't take the threat of AI seriously because we were worried about when it would be able to think on its own or become conscious... but what we needed to worry about was when AI would become capable enough to be usable, even if the results are often weird. And soon the results will be harder and harder to distinguish between real human results. And then we become dependent. And all that can happen before any AI starts to have a soul or something.
If you enjoy interacting with other viewers in youtube comments... I hope you are going to enjoy the future where you spend all day commenting with AI chat bots that are tailored to your personality.
You being worried about AI. 😂 What we should be worried about. Is the 1% realizing they have robots and AI so that they can get rid of the other 99% and have no problems. Fix global warming at the same time.
Exactly this idea that A.I. is going to overrun humans is crazy. People thought cars planes farming etc is all going to be done by bots is crazy. They cant even deliver a pizza
LOVE Elissa's comment about how (ironically) right here on TH-cam, coders have absolutely designed algorithms that monetize/maximize profits based on provocative content including hate speech. They are currently not liable for their behavior.
Shouldn't he get to win the next presidency simply by standing up and saying he was right about everything. Like he literally predicted the last 3 years on the campaign trail
What was he right about? He predicted that automation would cause mass unemployment, and he really thought that half of the people who lost their job because of the pandemic wouldn't get it back because of automation. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is 3% and labor force participation is as high as it's ever been. Andrew Yang is as wrong as it is possible to be.
"If I'm a conservative, God, heal me of my thoughts that liberals are the problem. If I'm a liberal, God, heal me of my thoughts that conservatives are the problem." -Marianne Williamson
“IT’S YOUR FUCKING FAULT I’M 5 MINUTES LATE!!! I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE COMPETENT THAN A SLOW THIRD-GRADER. . FUUUUCK!!!!” - also Marianne Williamson. Allegedly.
I worked in a call center taking inbound calls from angry customers. Bing Chat could do 99% of the calls, and abuse, I was paid to handle, based on what Ive seen it do already, given different prompts. Yang was right... its automatable today and I guarantee someones already out there working on it because right now every industry is asking themselves "how could AI save money for my business?"
Except for her stance on Palestine. Palestine is an aggressor nation that wants to eliminate the Israeli state. Sympathizing with them is inherently anti-semitic.
Fan of Yang, didn't care for Slotkin much. Watches the whole show and both dodged parts of the tougher questions but something about her I don't like. Can't quite tell what it is yet.
yang dodged questions because he wants to be productive, slotkin dodged questions because she doesn't want to face the uncomfortable truth that the democratic party side of society has series issues.
I'm not an Andrew yang fan but he ran circles around rep slotkin the entire episode, she sounded so vapid and generic compared to him, it was sad frankly.
No, anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism! Some members of a religion can decide they're entitled to a country of their own - others disagreeing with that notion has nothing to do with the religion itself.
Jews are an ethnic group, it’s why Atheist Jews are not an oxymoron. And of course the worst genocide of Jews - and they’ve been through more than one - was racially, not religiously based. A baptized Weinstein did not escape the gas chambers. Regardless, if this were 1917 or even 1947, I could concede the point. But after the right of the Jewish People to self-determination like other ethno-national groups have been recognized by the international community, and well established for close to a century, to declare that only they must today be removed of that right is antisemitic. Unless of course you are of the opinion that other countries like Turkey, Pakistan, etc. ought to also not exist. But if the one country to which you apply this moral logic happens to be the only one where Jews are a majority, it is fair to question if there is an ulterior motive.
Slotkin... people should absolutely have the freedom to monetize "extremism" or "hate." What a dangerous slippery slope. Who gets to define what is extreme or hateful? Scary stuff
@@brasshouse-og That's not how it worked. The VP was the first loser (came in second) of the EC vote. So wolf is correct. Under the ORIGINAL way the VP was chosen, trump would be VP right now.
Would be curious to hear what others think of the "no one wants to work" idea. I have been applying to tons of jobs, and every job I apply to has like 70 to 120 applicants. Serious competition. Also, for more info.....I am applying to skilled jobs, and I feel like unskilled labor that pays poorly might be hard to fill?
It is a dichotomy. There are jobs where, like you say, have too many applicants vying for one or two spots, while others are always in shortage. There are different reasons for different jobs. For instance, in jobs I have had, the problem is the applicant pool (and HR standards minimums about who we should expect to do the job). In other places, no one wants to do hard honest work. Sometimes it is because how people get treated at both kinds of jobs!
Everyone here is complementing Yang, but he abandoned UBI. He’s not going after big corporate money in politics that causes the corruption and status quos he supposedly started the Forward Party for.
People will continue to have this endless discussion on poverty and unaffordability of housing and services but will never, EVER mention that wages have stagnated for multiple decades. Somehow that never gets mentioned, let's just ignore the fact that that corporations make ever more profit but do not reinvest any of it into their workforce
Andrew yang is the truth.. how the hell did people rather trump or Biden over his intelligence and vision for America smfh…we would be in a better place if he’d won 2020
Anti-Zionism is NOT anti-Semitism. I am a pro-Semite with a great respect for the Jewish religion, people and history. I am also an anti-Zionist. I care about the treatment of the Palestinian people, and the state of Israel is both territorially aggressive and an apartheid government which denies equal rights to non-Jewish citizens.
You can be a zionist and still care about the treatment of Palestinians. And non Jewish citizens have the exact same rights as Jewish citizens in Israel. In fact the previous government that unseated Netanyahu included an Arab/Palestinian, Islamic party.
Yoga Chick that is an unbelievably stupid comment . Ignorant too. Anti Zionism means you think we don't desrve a home, that we should continue to be attacked by others. Arabs living within the SOI have the same rights as Jews which sadly is not the same for Jews and other minorities that have the misfortune to live in Arab countries. Like the Copts in Egypt, Yazidis in Iran, Zoroastrians.
VEEP just follow the President or sit in the corner...it's not going to be a fight in the WH. Like you sound like people want. Trump as Biden's veep = 25th Amendment each week.
It's a sensible safeguard. Harris was unpopular in the primaries but is a darling of the DNC, so they slid her into vp, knowing she could well get a free ticket to presidency. Ideally, I think veeps standing in as president should only be temporary, until someone else is fairly elected. Yang's idea is more practical though, because that vote is done in advance.
Calling anti-Zionism “anti-semitism” disregards the huge percentage of the jewish community who identify as “anti-zionist”, as most who witnessed the actions in the West Bank became
I never considered Yang as a legitimate candidate before. But I'm slowly changing my mind on that. I think he is thoughtful, well spoken and thinks things through before he speaks.. and that's just a few of the many things I am liking about him. I think he should run again.
Yeah you're right, he's very intelligible and cares of the people
Back in the run up to 2020, what excluded him from legitimacy in your perception? Certainly you were not alone in that. Also, did you have candidates at the time besides the guy who won who did appear legitimate? What were the factors that informed your perception?
@@brockmiller574 I'm curious on this as well. I was a big Yang supporter and it's always interesting to hear how ppl outside of my bubble perceived him
I agree.he is very intelligent and he is able to see more than one side of an issue.
Hmm, so what happened? Decided to take off your ideological blinders and decided to listen for a change? Gross. Maybe don't vote until you decide to start listening 100% of the time? Thanks in advance!
The transition from Yang talking about the millions of jobs about to disappear and the question about the hat is like something out of the Hunger Games.
Andrew is great. He has always great comments.
Slotkin is just the kind of politician we don’t need
I actually agree, but probably for different reasons than you. She never said a true word that she thought, except showing that she was so woke that she HAD to assert her pro-Palestinians/anti-Israel into the Israel argument. As a Jewish Dem, I hate having to listen to self-hating Jews. But all that aside, every answer she gave was extremely political and CAREFUL. Too afraid that people might hate to hear what she really thinks.
@@jbjacobs9514 i hate having to listen to israeli actresses blindly support a military dictatorship that kills innocent civilians
@@jbjacobs9514 Ah that's an interesting take, with the criticism of her pro Palestinian line. I'm curious how ppl feel about Slotkin on here, especially given that she's now running for the Senate
OP (Rick), what was your reason for not liking Slotkin?
She's awful, 100 % political.
No one is willing to say plainly that it was obviously rude for that lady to wear that big dress at the Oscars.
Yeah thats totally gross. That lady knew that she was going to block others view. It shows that she just only thinks about herself.
Sure, but to be mocked across the world. Might be a bit much.
@@mokilokenot enough you mean
Slotkin's idea was the best: make the stupid hat collapsible.
It clearly was. I would say inconsiderate is an even more accurate word. However I agree with Noa that it also wasn't worth using as a question on Overtime.
Overtime is too short. Needs 15mins
Indeed. Too bad their corporate daddy said no.
@@divinedemonj It was this short before CNN started airing it.
Sheeiit, it needs to be a full hour! Get deeper in to the topics.
@@dwaynehendricks7842
sometimes the initial interview segment needs to be one hour.
I like Andrew Yang. He studies a topic before he speaks of it. In my opinion he would be a good senator. I would vote for him and I'm a registered Republican.
Even for ubi?
@@joetatoesniff9525 UBI is a net benefit for the economy.
@JoetatoeSniff because corporate bailouts and subsidies are so much different right? 🙄
Universal income is socialism
lol.. not voting for pro censorship, sorry
That lady at the Oscars is problematic of a bigger problem. People simply not caring about their fellow citizens. It's minor for the moment, but it's a major problem across the country.
Fellow Earthlings*
Animals should also be in our circle of compassion. ❤️
I thought the same exact thing. I'll bet money they didn't want to touch this subject because of her skin color. End of story...
I agree, society is in the toilet and too many people don't care about being decent.
I call it public behavior, and that is sorely lacking, at least where I live and work every day.
They should have told that selfish twat either take the head piece off or get the fuck out of the theater
Thanks for having Yang on the show, Bill.
I think Yang is a great guy, eloquent speaker, highly educated and caring person!
He also shoots whipped cream inside mouths of men.
i'd rather have yin.
He's a waste of everyone's time. Just hot air searching for an intelligent thought.
#YangGang
America needs to see more of Andrew Yang. Then the media and CAN’T dismiss him next time he runs.
The more they see him, the less they like him.
@@RasTona_ Like compared to whom? Trump? Biden? You must be that silly to believe that nonsense!
@@robertpolanco1973 I'm not gonna vote for either. He's not far from them either. Just bc I don't like Biden and Trump, It doesn't mean I'm gonna vote for their love child. It's this mind set that got us in this mess. We have made it so easy for any candidate to get elected as long as they hate someone we hate. push comes to shove, Yang is voting for himself and the democrats.
@@RasTona_ Yang is NOT a Democrat in any way because he is more of a third-party alternative! Furthermore, EVERY politician in this country votes for himself/herself anyway for many decades, too!
@@robertpolanco1973 He's NOT a democrat in anyway?? He ran on their ticket, and on the same episode he was pleading with biden to give other democrats like himself a chance. "Third party" means different from party 1 and party2. There's no such thing as a "more of a third party". Just come-out and say " we are 3rd party, this is our plan........"
but thanks for admitting Yang is all about himself just like other politicians. So why do we need more of just like the other politicians?
Why so afraid for them to say the actress was rude and self centre? Yes more important things to discuss but this could have been simply.
That Noah Tishby lady is the self centered Hollywood elite that people always talk about.
That actress at the Oscar's is a good representation of America today. Ignorance is king and calling it out gets you canceled and labeled.
What I wanted to ask is what if they put another person of color with an even more broadly feathered and fanned out elaborate outfit in front of her?????
Ignorance seems to be trying to take over common sense,shows how stupid a lot of people really are.
@@robertmichalscheck3072 - I agree with you. Most people in America are either stupid or don't care about the country.
My favorite sign at a WWE show is "THE PEOPLE BEHIND ME CAN'T SEE".
israel is not a legitimate country.
Andrew is very underrated and he has humility and authenticity in his experience in life that very few have
Andrew yang stands for nothing
@@anthonyesposito7 yeah he does! He tells both sides to fuck off!!
Overworked Land surveyor here, My career is one of those Jobs that is absolutely critical to all construction and mapping services. 15 years Experience and I am done, I found myself working harder as i got older and its not because I am aging in reverse. My company could not find any hires and the ones they do find are worthless. I had to go around fixing everything they did, taking time out of my own work.
We were literally operating crews messing everything up and the old crews that fix all those mistakes. Forced to work 6 day work weeks and 10 hour days, my father passed away without hardly seeing me because of my work schedule. Calling me jaded is a understatement.
I've heard this sort of thing from company owners too like my HVAC guy and my mechanic. Can't get good people.
If you're in such high demand then push back against the "Man". I'm a network engineer and we're in much the same predicament. The schools churn out discombobulated young people with poor social skills who can't/won't do the job. More than half of them leave the field in the first two years. The rest of us who can do this get to call the shots. I hand pick my clients and say "No" all the time. There is a labor shortage in this country that's only getting worse.
Could you take on less Jobs?
I don't know what kind of house you have, or car you drive - but less is sometimes more ❤
If what you state is true then you should absolutely bring it up to your managers and bosses. Tell them about the extra work you need to put in. Do NOT work for free quietly and complain on the side. Seriously from what youve said it sounds like you offer a lot more to the company and deserve to be paid more.
People don’t need to use “literally” so much
Every time I listen to Andrew Yang I'm really impressed. I wish his Forward party luck as America could really benefit from a healthy 3rd political party. BTW most democracies have multiple political parties that offers more choice and helps reduce that bipartisan tribal edge that now consumes America. My family are duel citizen, Canadian and American and I've always wondered why the American public tolerate having just two political parties while they can go to a Walmart and choose 8 different kinds of Yogurt at the Grocery store.
You mean 4th party
I'm not sure about every democratic country, or Canada for that matter. But seems to me there's only 2 parties in the UK. Labor and Tories. The only ones who seem to get power. The US has more than 2 parties, but only the 2 major parties hold the power. Same thing no?
We could use the five to seven we already have operating covertly within the two dominant..oh wait one with two side 🙄
All those choices make us feel like we have freedoms and choice. The left and right are thugs who will do ANYTHING to hold onto that power SMH 😔
Maybe in 2027, the country and world is going through too much shit right now, a second term for Biden means he comes with experience and we don't need someone coming in with a learning curve right now. Let Biden also continue steering the country to the left more.
Rep Slotkin has a few good points, but she is completely wrong about a third party. A third party would NOT be an extreme party; it would be the moderates from both parties. We all are tried of the extremes in BOTH parties. We also have a new appreciation for Andrew Yang.
Agreed
Everytime I see Yang come back to the public spotlight, he is still consistently addressing the actual REAL issues in America. He was right about everything and points out we're wasting time everyday fighting battles between extreme Democrats and Republicans and getting further divided and further from solving our problems more effectively. Someone please get this awesome man in office! 🙌
As lil Andy yang ATTACKS " get rid of Trump" yet Yang is eatin up with abscessed TDS...Attacking and creating the great divide towards HONEST AMERICANS that support the finest POTUS ever in the history of the USA. T R U M P ..as an independent I voted for Hillary and Obama... HUGEE mistake.. someday perhaps you will see the light ..Go WOKE Go Broke !
Andrew Yang is always ahead of the time and it shows with how dull the crowd is when he speaks
Exactly
Thevwomen were just negating all his ideas to look smart or try to
Never heard Elissa Slotkin speak before but I don't care for her much. Also, I love Noa Tishby saying thank you after 2 people clap lol
Some companies laying of 40% of their workforce is pretty crazy. I’m surprised that’s not a bigger talking point.
It will be when the elections come up. Then it will be "Biden's fault" for not stopping AI from advancing or some shit. People always find the way to blame the president, even though it's the corporations that obviously run the show.
Great show as always Bill, sincere thanks for your work and for your terrific sense of humor.
Yepper, Bill's show is better than ever. Enjoy his Club podcast also. Can't wait to see his standup, selling out fast.
Americans work in call centers??? Every time I call for customer service I get somebody from a country that I can't understand what they're saying. Most are from India.
And they are named David or Peter. LOL.
Discover Card has their call center in Utah.
There are, but to get to one of them a caller must spend close to ten minutes in the maze that is the automated system.
"Every time I call for customer service I get somebody from a country that I can't understand"
Yupp, that is the US in a nutshell
True. In my job in IT I've had to place a lot of calls to call centers over the last 20 or so years. Used to be you would get a majority of American's on the other end of the line. In the last 8 or so years I can't remember the last time I spoke to an American. Vast majority are Indian with a smattering of Phillipinos.
I like Andrew Yang a lot.
As a person, for sure.
We need the Freedom Dividend.
would love a chance to vote for him in the primary, and even if he doesnt win, i may end up writing his name in anyway. Im getting tired of going with the worse choice because theyre more popular.
Not everyone believes in Jesus Christ, nor do we feel " less than" because we don't kneel and pray to a statue....
Okay?
Great comments on all issues. I love how Andrew Yang is always looking forward to the consequences of technology advances.
Yang has been warning us for years.
You’re a simple man.
Yang is an inspiration. Would love to see him have some political power. Yang gang.
@@mokiloke yangs wangs
Because he's a rich guy who would benefit from automation. I doubt anyone in his immediate family will lose a job to a machine so of course he's ok with it.
Yang understands what’s really happening.
Not really. He's just gaslighting everyone for grift as per his usual tactic. He's no genius.
@@noire.blackheart He does not rely on demonization, and gets into some practical world detail. Also he doesn't cater to the lowest impulses.
@@benjamingruder4875what do you mean? He just catered to the lowest impulses of the audience in this video.
@@vinegarpisser2992 He did not target a group to hate. That would have been catering the lowest impulses.
@@noire.blackheart Where did he gaslight anyone? CS jobs will be the first to fall. I got laid off from a CS job last year. We got replaced by a chat bot.
Rank Choice Voting.
Still Yang Gang!
Yanggang4life
The same procedure is used by an OB/GYN to treat an ectopic pregnancy as a doctor would use to provide an elective abortion...and states like Idaho will now charge doctors with a crime if they execute this procedure, regardless of reason. Ectopic pregnancies, if not terminated, can be fatal to women.
Please provide the name of this Idaho law, and the chapter and section number where it defines what an abortion is. Every reference I have found specifically exempts ectopic pregnancy and misarrange treatments.
Yang is always a delightful guest. This man should be on a perpetual podcast tour.
Andrew needs to work on spicing up his own podcast again but I know he has been too busy. 😕 Did you know that a #YangGang meme is how we got Ke Huy Kwon back into acting with Everything Everywhere All at Once?
Pro life is a religious belief. Prove to me that it’s not a violation of separation of church (beliefs) and state! Forcing a religious belief on the country is a flat out violation of the separation of church and state!
yes .. don't force your stuff on me ....
“Caring about human life is a religious belief. How dare you make murder illegal!” I get that it’s not that simple, but everything about how we treat people comes back to our fundamental beliefs about the world (whether religious or humanist or whatever other term that gets at the basic philosophy you live your life based on). There are atheists that oppose abortion. My opposition of third-trimester and hesitancy about second-trimester abortion comes from my psychology classes where we talked about how fetuses do encode memory in the womb (the closest standard we have to personhood, unless you are going to claim that the average baby does not achieve personhood until 2 years of age and some people with various disabilities never reach personhood, both ideas that I reject, largely because of my religion).
So parents can kill their children? Why not? They aren't adults yet. Without using morals, explain.
Wow talk about going over the cliff with extreme conclusions! Wow!
@@marvinmartin4692 extreme by what measure? Roman father's could kill their underaged kids. That was only 1500 years ago. Our government is in part based on Rome. What determines ethics? If culture promotes an ideal how is it wrong?
Andrew Yang is very reasonable.
Wow it’s like you shouldn’t be commenting or voting
Yeah I thought he had some ideas before, now he just sounds crazy
His panel wasn't my favorite people
I like him a lot! I actually supported him in the Iowa Caucasus this previous election
Totally 💯
Andrew yang is great - very bright bloke
As an Arab-American, I have an issue with the anti-Zionism equating anti-Semitism. If I was to question the reasons for the establishment of the United States in this country (feathering and tarring British, slavery, Native American suffering), that doesn’t make me anti-American. It makes me critical of certain origin issues that the US had a hand in without wishing ill will to the US as a nation presently. One can still have a healthy conversation of some of the issues of how Israel started as a country at the expense of Palestinians (the result of Zionist passions) without necessarily wishing for the dismantling of a whole legitimate nation in its present form. There should be freedom of a healthy discussion on this so that we can right the wrongs of the past, which is what makes the US such a great nation today, in that we admit not every origin story is black and white, and some problems associated with the origins of nations and the philosophical foundations of that establishment should be criticized for the betterment of the nations. And what a wonderful world it would be for an Israel who can admit that Zionism has its dark side (as well as its justifications) and that Israel can be a better place for its Arab citizens today for that freedom to discuss and right the wrongs of that dark side while praising its accomplishments.
No one is saying that discussing the conflict in israel is antisemitism just that delegitimise the existence of israel and the right of the jews to national definition is antisemitism
@@noa-wu9sn I fear that when one speaks “against Zionism” while supporting the right for Israel to exist as a nation gets misconstrued in this debate as “anti-Semitic”. I just wanted to put it out there a lot of people in this world do not differentiate between Zionism and the conflicts. And I figured I’d make an analogy to the founding of the US to make it clear why it shouldn’t be “anti-Semitic”.
@@minasoliman I'm Christian and I agree with you.
Shame that ChatGPT got glossed over. AI is a HUGE threat and also an extremely important tool we’ll want to develop and Yang could have directly connected it to UBI which we all will probably need.
As a programmer these discussions about "AI" are killing me - ChatGPT and other LLM's are not even remotely close to AGI, we need to be clearer about what we're discussing because otherwise it's prone to misinterpretation or exploitation. If you start off the discussion talking about "AI" I just instantly assume you have no idea what you're talking about.
ChatGPT sucks. It literally did basic addition wrong and passed it off like there wasnt any error. Dumb af
Please explain more. I'm a novice and I'm interested in what you're saying.
@@hew195050 What most people are now calling "AI" is really just an extremely large language model which performs inference calculations. It's just extremely fine-tuned by humans to produce what we would expect. It's actually kind of scary how well some of this has worked, like a lot of us don't really understand why training it on certain datasets has worked so well.
Totally, it’s the cringiest thing listening to an noob talk about GPT
Most people think of a strong AI when talking about AIs, however, any system that can use pattern recognition in order to generate new, topic relevant content, can be considered an AI.
Moreover, defining AI aside, chatGPT has a major influence on the Junior developer job market. Sadly it is a problem, and as these technology and others like it continue to develop, it will effect more and more people.
It wasn’t right for her to block their view. She should have taken it off. Just out of good manners. I thought it was rude.
#YangGang 🤟🏻
Andrew Yang for president.
Your guest from Israel is pretty.
The problem we have with the job market and the labor force is that we have a ton of open jobs that pay crap and treat workers like garbage, but companies are unwilling to change so they just claim "nobody wants to work"
Then we have many open jobs for skilled workers, but there's a shortage of those workers because nobody has those skills. We can blame the education system, but we also need to blame companies because they won't train or groom anyone. They expect someone to walk in and have little to no onboarding and just get right to it.
Then finally, we have lots of jobs out there open, people could do them, they pay well, but companies have these horrendously broken recruiting systems that drag things out forever and ever to actually finally hire somebody, and then they come in to a toxic workplace and want to leave very quickly.
The reality is that too many companies had it too good when we had an overabundance of people and a shortage of jobs. It's sad even that some companies want to go back to that. The writing was on the wall after the pandemic, but companies are just living in denial and still claiming that "culture" and "in-person collaboration" are the big things, when they are not. They also still won't pay a living wage that somebody in those vicinities can live on. That, or they won't let these people be remote and go live someplace where they can afford to live on that salary.
So now they want to bring in AI and just replace more people. What's going to happen when now you have a plethora of population unable to afford to buy anything?
I guarantee those same companies are then going to be lobbying the government to set up socialist programs and pay these companies taxpayer money to basically give out their goods or services.
well said mr alex !! now if only our 'leaders' (besides bernie) will understand that and find ways to make it better ..
@@MrVandj1 but they do get it !! large 'donation's' to stay in power come on a regular basis ..
Spot on!
👏👏👏👏
@@direwolf6234 I'm so sick of Bernie sanders supporters I could puke.
At the 9-minute mark Slotkin sounds like she is against the 1st Amendment. Very troubling.
Because she is.
Democrats are pro censorship by using government agencies colluding with social media platforms to suppress free speech
Very troubling and she just lost my vote. I was kind of sick of her anyway.
Great response by Elissa Slotkin! Noa had nothing to say about everyone always screaming anti-semitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people 👍
Who has ever screamed antisemitism when people are just concerned for the Palestinian people, what are their names?
This boring talking point about
"It's not antisemitic to criticize the policies of the Israeli government" is a straw man argument. Who has ever said that?
Andrew yang is the smartest politician in America right now. he understand the future
As a person that has recently setup a call center, i agree they are getting cut. After covid they cut back 80% and I had to pack up and move a lot of that same equipment.
If Andrew Yang is on, I'm watching. Let's hear more from Yang please.
Slotkin is ignoring the fact that most of the jobs that aren't getting filled is bc the jobs suck and the pay is worse.
People decided that manual labor job opportunities are many times more physically demanding and people decided after the covid lock downs those positions though many times pay well don't have overall benefits including insurance and retirement programs that support the amount of physically associated ailments that obviously come with manual labor job opportunities and so many people fell for the myth that it's better to stay home than work
@@sharonhamilton3439 People won't be king makers anymore when they only get peanuts. The Corps need labor more than laborers need jobs. We hold the power, but are just too self-interested to ever get collectively organized. UNIONS! People fell for the "right to work" myth 35 years ago.
If Dems actually cared about abortion rights the way they say they do, why didn't they pass federal legislation any of the times in the last 50 years that they had control of the executive and legislative?
They obviously don't care like republicans don't care about Obamacare.
That's only acceptable way this ever could be done.
1) Roe v Wade was bullshit and deserved to be struck.
2) The people want legal abortion.
3) Then write and pass a goddamn law, this is a democracy!
If you can't pass the law, then you can't pass the law. That's how our system works and that's exactly how it should work.
The most immediate problem with AI is that the capitalist system is not set up for handling it. That AI does a lot of work for us should be a good thing because it means in general we all have to work less. But if the AI is owned by the rich capitalists it means a few people will gain the benefits of that increased production and a lot of people will get nothing.
It's no different than any other productivity improvement. If the market is competitive then the value of those mostly go to consumers.
@@ISpitHotFiyaa Except that it isn't competitive because capitalism always tends toward monopolization.
@@SolidAir54321 Well then that's the real problem. We should do something about that rather than worry about AI.
"I'm into breathe!" 🤣 Masterfully played sir! You don't want to get pulled into that religious quicksand.
"Especially inhaling."
Yang is on a different level than these airheads.
Sexist. Why call the women airheads? Yang talks in bumper stickers.
True, but he's learned to hold back, submissively agree to a certain point, as a result of what all he's dealt with and dealing with since he entered politics. In the end that's a mentally unstable enforced way to keep getting the completely insane way. I thought that he would have made a great mayor of New York City, in every way, all of his innovative ideas, including his good management to be able to carry them out, and look what have gotten instead, the whole state of New York. Shameless dunces, corrupted to the core. That's what pleases Oligarchy Globalists psychopaths. If successful, he could have set a precedent for other important cities to follow in The USA, especially blue cities in most dire and drastic systemic need of change.
@@anaibarangan4908 I learned how deeply corrupted the NYC political system is by following Yang's mayoral run. It's crazy the amount of manipulation and favor trading that happened during that election. There is a lot of interest in keeping NYC corrupt. It's easier to buy out career politicians.
What do they put in the water in Israel Gal Gadot Bar Rafali Noa Tishby❤
Glad to hear Yang is back to talking about his bread and butter. Automation versus human employment. 🤓
Its probably the most important topic globally at this current moment, alongside the environment. Yang was proved right far quicker than anyone imagined.
I wish he talked more policy and explained how he thinks the Forward Party is going to fix the broken 2-party system that benefits more from NOT solving issues. Leaving abortion rights in limbo meant it could be a voter issue in every election. That turned out terribly.
@@faceplants2 I can fill in as a member of the Forward Party. His intention is to build the movement/party from the ground up instead of top-down. As such, the Forward Party's current focus is local elections not big ticket ones. Also the chief party policy positions are currently ranked choice voting, open primaries, and multi-member districts.
Rank choice voting seeks to reduce the spoiler effect (also known as voting for the lesser of two evils). It allows people to vote for who they actually want, while still ensuring if their candidate isn't viable for a chance to win their vote will still be counted towards their preference of candidates. Expected impacts are reduced negative political attacks (since they lose their value in a ranked choice voting system) and initial cost both in funds/time to retrofit voting procedures/systems. Alaska currently uses this system successfully.
Open primaries look to reduce the level of extremism present in both major political parties. By making the primaries of both Democrats and Republicans open to public vote by all, the candidates unacceptable to one of the camps are unlikely to achieve a nomination. This should result in more moderate candidates overall and more bipartisan agreement. This idea is common in Europe.
Multi-member districts is really a stretch goal (the first two are likely to succeed, the multi-member district idea is still not quite ready for passage). The idea is that we triple the number of politicians in both the house and senate but keep the number of districts the same. Instead of districts having 1 candidate, they will have 3 each. Those 3 will be the 3 highest ranking in voting using the rank choice voting system. As such, in red districts we would expect 2 Republicans and an Independent; In blue districts we would expect 2 Democrats and an Independent; and in contested or "purple" districts, we would expect 1 Republican, 1 Democrat, and 1 Independent. This should result in a more responsive government (3 times as many folks representing each person means more availability for responses) and a political body that is more a true representation of the American people (ex: Republicans in blue districts, and Democrats in red districts would get better representation). This would also nearly kill Gerrymandering as it would lose its usefulness in a multi-member district (At best Gerrymandering could only determine who was 1st and 2nd pick, not whether a candidate is elected or not).
Noa is absolutely gorgeous! Love those beautiful and intelligent Jewish women!
What Slotkin’s “pro-life” constituent said about abortion, is the definition of pro-choice.
Which is why republican messaging is pro-life vs pro-abortion.
Democrats need to frame pro-life as anti-choice.
Yang should be president
Of every country!!!
in a perfect world. people are too stupid to vote for him.
I'm a member of the Forward Party, but I'm losing faith in our ability to reform this system without some dripping red meat to hold out in front of voters.
UBI used to be that meat...Yang hasn't really touted it in a long time.
@@szahmad2416 I agree he has to talk about the benefits of his ubi plan again
@@szahmad2416 cause its a silly idea
Sadly I think the extreme brokenness of the system after 2024 will have to be the red meat to get it done, I wish the voters could be proactive enough to get it done before dire circumstances give us no choice but apparently that isn’t how most are wired but I applaud the Forward Party trying to give us an option to move a little faster with those reforms
@@Dan16673 OK, burger-man.
It turns out we didn't take the threat of AI seriously because we were worried about when it would be able to think on its own or become conscious... but what we needed to worry about was when AI would become capable enough to be usable, even if the results are often weird. And soon the results will be harder and harder to distinguish between real human results. And then we become dependent. And all that can happen before any AI starts to have a soul or something.
If you enjoy interacting with other viewers in youtube comments... I hope you are going to enjoy the future where you spend all day commenting with AI chat bots that are tailored to your personality.
You being worried about AI. 😂 What we should be worried about. Is the 1% realizing they have robots and AI so that they can get rid of the other 99% and have no problems. Fix global warming at the same time.
@@franklin9400 AI is going to destroy art and culture. Humanity will become pure consumers, producing nothing.
@Go Away The 1% are going to build a giant underground city to ride out. When they wipe out the "annoying" 99%. Not a future of AI chat bots.
Exactly this idea that A.I. is going to overrun humans is crazy. People thought cars planes farming etc is all going to be done by bots is crazy. They cant even deliver a pizza
Vice President is often not who the president thinks is the best option it's political negotiations behind the scenes.
Like Obama really thought Biden was the best choice. He needed an old white man.
LOVE Elissa's comment about how (ironically) right here on TH-cam, coders have absolutely designed algorithms that monetize/maximize profits based on provocative content including hate speech. They are currently not liable for their behavior.
Yeah that’s the thread to pull on for the right and left to find common ground. Big tech needs accountability, not protection.
Shouldn't he get to win the next presidency simply by standing up and saying he was right about everything. Like he literally predicted the last 3 years on the campaign trail
We are too glazed over to ever vote for someone honest who really wants thing to get better.
Who is he?
@@svscared yang.
What was he right about? He predicted that automation would cause mass unemployment, and he really thought that half of the people who lost their job because of the pandemic wouldn't get it back because of automation. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is 3% and labor force participation is as high as it's ever been. Andrew Yang is as wrong as it is possible to be.
"If I'm a conservative, God,
heal me of my thoughts
that liberals are the problem.
If I'm a liberal, God, heal me
of my thoughts that
conservatives are the problem."
-Marianne Williamson
“IT’S YOUR FUCKING FAULT I’M 5 MINUTES LATE!!! I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE COMPETENT THAN A SLOW THIRD-GRADER. . FUUUUCK!!!!”
- also Marianne Williamson. Allegedly.
Sorry but even putting bots in control of responses when customers are pissed abt a sky high bill is not going to work.
but it will, people will be yelling at bots, bots will get hurt feelings and endlife on earth....pretty much what's happening here on YT.
I worked in a call center taking inbound calls from angry customers. Bing Chat could do 99% of the calls, and abuse, I was paid to handle, based on what Ive seen it do already, given different prompts. Yang was right... its automatable today and I guarantee someones already out there working on it because right now every industry is asking themselves "how could AI save money for my business?"
If the businesses can save money, they'll do it. They don't care about their customers
Putting a fat psychological and emotional basket case on that call to promptly have a nervous breakdown is a better option?
@@julessaviour5931 Other way around. If the customers can save money, they'll do it. They don't care about the workers.
The jobs she is speaking about are 10/hr with bad schedules . People don’t want to have that job.
The Michigander , Slotkin, running for Senate is very impressive. Common sensical and a clear thinker. Smart.
Except for her stance on Palestine. Palestine is an aggressor nation that wants to eliminate the Israeli state. Sympathizing with them is inherently anti-semitic.
Really? What Can You Point To That Evidences Her Clear Thinking? Just recycles Democratice talking points
Didn't make an interesting point the whole show, imo. Just made a lot of faces.
@@tomsmith5785 she was astutely correcting Maher’s usual lazy generalizations . I love folks who do that.
@@TheDivayenta Didn’t sense the same. Thank you for your reply.
Slotkin does not belong in politics period.
Fan of Yang, didn't care for Slotkin much. Watches the whole show and both dodged parts of the tougher questions but something about her I don't like. Can't quite tell what it is yet.
yang dodged questions because he wants to be productive, slotkin dodged questions because she doesn't want to face the uncomfortable truth that the democratic party side of society has series issues.
Same
I'm not an Andrew yang fan but he ran circles around rep slotkin the entire episode, she sounded so vapid and generic compared to him, it was sad frankly.
I know. I've seen him do this multiple times in the past -- it's always brilliant to watch
Perfect summation.
I thought they both did well. I'm never a fan of having to tear someone down in order to build someone else up.
OK...I'll be the first to say it...Noa T is a stunningly beautiful woman... :) :)
Yang for President
Or anyone other than most other politicians.
No, anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism! Some members of a religion can decide they're entitled to a country of their own - others disagreeing with that notion has nothing to do with the religion itself.
So are you advocating for the destruction of the state of Israel ?
Jews are an ethnic group, it’s why Atheist Jews are not an oxymoron. And of course the worst genocide of Jews - and they’ve been through more than one - was racially, not religiously based. A baptized Weinstein did not escape the gas chambers.
Regardless, if this were 1917 or even 1947, I could concede the point. But after the right of the Jewish People to self-determination like other ethno-national groups have been recognized by the international community, and well established for close to a century, to declare that only they must today be removed of that right is antisemitic. Unless of course you are of the opinion that other countries like Turkey, Pakistan, etc. ought to also not exist. But if the one country to which you apply this moral logic happens to be the only one where Jews are a majority, it is fair to question if there is an ulterior motive.
Finally, I was searching for this comment. Quite disappointed I've been scrolling for like 5 minutes to get to it. I thought that was bs as well.
Noa Tishby in smart and beautiful.... holy moly
Andrew Yang hits on every point👏🏾😎🤙🏾
You tell ‘‘em Andrew Yang!! I’m a Republican who believes in you!!!
Slotkin... people should absolutely have the freedom to monetize "extremism" or "hate." What a dangerous slippery slope. Who gets to define what is extreme or hateful? Scary stuff
The algorithm case before the supreme court is the root issue for a lot of problems in the US. It should be more front & center.
It would actually be a good idea to make the runner up be VP.
what runner up ?? then trump would be VP ??
@@direwolf6234 no, the leading democrat behind Biden. I believe that would have been Bernie.
@@brasshouse-og ok got it ... however few would run knowing they's be VP .. might as well stay as a senator or governor
@@brasshouse-og That's not how it worked. The VP was the first loser (came in second) of the EC vote. So wolf is correct. Under the ORIGINAL way the VP was chosen, trump would be VP right now.
@@direwolf6234 Brass gave you incorrect information. Whatever you "got" from him, I hope a shot of penicillin clears it up.
I really like Andrew Yang, so glad to see him on here
What we need is an organization called D.R.A.G. - Disciples Reading Apostolic Gospel. This way it’s literally Drag Story Hour.
Andrew Yang !!
Cool !
Noa Tisby is 🔥! Damn.❤❤❤❤
Would be curious to hear what others think of the "no one wants to work" idea. I have been applying to tons of jobs, and every job I apply to has like 70 to 120 applicants. Serious competition.
Also, for more info.....I am applying to skilled jobs, and I feel like unskilled labor that pays poorly might be hard to fill?
It is a dichotomy. There are jobs where, like you say, have too many applicants vying for one or two spots, while others are always in shortage. There are different reasons for different jobs. For instance, in jobs I have had, the problem is the applicant pool (and HR standards minimums about who we should expect to do the job). In other places, no one wants to do hard honest work. Sometimes it is because how people get treated at both kinds of jobs!
Andrew Yang for President!
😂
Everyone here is complementing Yang, but he abandoned UBI. He’s not going after big corporate money in politics that causes the corruption and status quos he supposedly started the Forward Party for.
People will continue to have this endless discussion on poverty and unaffordability of housing and services but will never, EVER mention that wages have stagnated for multiple decades. Somehow that never gets mentioned, let's just ignore the fact that that corporations make ever more profit but do not reinvest any of it into their workforce
Good overtime conversation.
it was actually trash, the topics were boring and the commentary was surface level banal bs.
Andrew yang is the truth.. how the hell did people rather trump or Biden over his intelligence and vision for America smfh…we would be in a better place if he’d won 2020
Our Supreme Court resembles something out of the 18th Century
Good because the idea is a really from the ancient world. Glad we made it look young and hip.
Yes, because of all the Jews, women, blacks and Latins on the 18th Century Supreme Court.
@@silencemeviolateme6076 wait until there are religious police like in Iran. Ass-backwards the USA
Who remembers Oliver Stone’s movie advert where he held up the smart phone and said this will be the end of us?
Andrew Yang should run again with the slogan "I told you so"
Don't like waiting for Overtime.
:DDD it's literally called: over time. But I laughed hard anyway.
This is precisely why I wait until Saturday to watch Bill, so I can immediately go to overtime afterwards; I hate this cnn connection they have now.
Agreed. This new format sucks. I don't think it's doing well anyway.
I'd like to hear Larry David's take on the big dress.
It's past the time to vote out the Uniparty/Duopoly
Noa Tishby is the best! Bring her back to the show ❤
2:58: "I just read the questions" = Soooo, sounds like Bill's job is replaceable too?!?!!!!!
Anti-Zionism is NOT anti-Semitism. I am a pro-Semite with a great respect for the Jewish religion, people and history. I am also an anti-Zionist. I care about the treatment of the Palestinian people, and the state of Israel is both territorially aggressive and an apartheid government which denies equal rights to non-Jewish citizens.
You can be a zionist and still care about the treatment of Palestinians.
And non Jewish citizens have the exact same rights as Jewish citizens in Israel. In fact the previous government that unseated Netanyahu included an Arab/Palestinian, Islamic party.
Yoga Chick that is an unbelievably stupid comment . Ignorant too. Anti Zionism means you think we don't desrve a home, that we should continue to be attacked by others. Arabs living within the SOI have the same rights as Jews which sadly is not the same for Jews and other minorities that have the misfortune to live in Arab countries. Like the Copts in Egypt, Yazidis in Iran, Zoroastrians.
Love that idea of a primary for veep or whomever comes in 2nd. Would avoid getting terrible veeps in most cases
VEEP just follow the President or sit in the corner...it's not going to be a fight in the WH. Like you sound like people want. Trump as Biden's veep = 25th Amendment each week.
Trump?
It's a sensible safeguard. Harris was unpopular in the primaries but is a darling of the DNC, so they slid her into vp, knowing she could well get a free ticket to presidency.
Ideally, I think veeps standing in as president should only be temporary, until someone else is fairly elected. Yang's idea is more practical though, because that vote is done in advance.
@@Murgatroydian as Nash said the choice is the presidential candidate's and you judge their choice by voting for the candidate or not.
@@Murgatroydian nailed it. They shoved Harris dos our throats, just like with Hillary.
Calling anti-Zionism “anti-semitism” disregards the huge percentage of the jewish community who identify as “anti-zionist”, as most who witnessed the actions in the West Bank became
"When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You're talking antisemitism." - Martin Luther King Jr., 1968.
The problem with regulating monetization of "hate" content is that it is nearly impossible to agree on how to define hate.
yang is awesome, slotkin seems woke-friendly and unintuitive