This video is what all reviewers should be striving to achieve. Under 15 mins. So much information. So useful and well organised, and made by someone who really knows their sh*t.
Basketball photographers will love this. Unless you want that ultra wide look this lens will cover almost the entire game. This + 300mm would be ideal for basketball.
I love your channel for lens evaluation because you show real world results as opposed to charts and color swatches that other channels do. Plus you have a great personality and are a great photographer too.
I was convinced from two reviews that this lens was not for me because it had questionable AF in low light situations - now with more reviews out it appears that maybe that is not the case. Pairing this lens with the 16-35 GM would make event photography so much easier. And I probably would have less reason to consider the 70-200 GM II. I like the rendering of the old zoom so I could use it with the 1.4x TC for those times when I need more on the longer end.
You are my favorite photographer for portrait 💙. I bought Sony 35mm F1.4 GM after watching you video. Do you think the weight and size of this lens will be a problem for using as travelling lense? In your opinion if you will choose one lense today travelling abroad, will you pick 24-70 f2.8 or 35-150 f2-2.8. Or you still prefer carrying like 2 lenses 35mm and 85mm. I would appreciate for your opinion.
I just ordered this lens, finally pulled the trigger. I've been shooting with a Sony 85mm 1.8, Samyang 35mm 1.4, and Tamron 24mm 2.8. I know this is a heavy lens, but I will manage just fine. I've had the Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 on a Sony a6000, so i can imagine how this will be on my a7 iii.
I absolutely trust your reviews and I don't like you at this moment....because your video is now putting me in the market for this lens. My wife is going to kill me! :-)
As always, very informative video Julia! I have a question. Currently i'm using the 35mm f1.4 GM, 85mm f1.8 and the Tamron 28-200 for travel. I want to bring one lens on my next big trip and consider replacing the 3 aforementioned lenses for the 35-150. Would you say, at the wide end, the 1.4 vs the 2.0 is a big compromise? I'm sure I won't miss the extra stop at 85mm, and the 50mm of shorter reach compared to the 28-200 is also neglectable for my purposes. I just love the 35mm GM and am hesitant to hand in the compact form and extra stop of light. What would your advice be? Thanks a lot!
As a wedding photographer I love shooting with the 28-70 f/2.0 RF. This would be way better. I feel like they made this for wedding photographers. I've been rocking debt free for a hot minute. Might have to get this and a A7IV to finally give Sony a proper try. I'm positive if I don't like it, I could sell it after a couple months for minimal loss.
@@godsinbox I'm not the person you asked, but the reason to consider switching is if it's good enough to let you reduce total lenses needed for the job. The RF 28-70 is so good it can convert people who thought of themselves as prime shooters to replace their 24 1.4, 35 1.4, 50 1.2, and 85 1.2/1.4 with just a single lens. It's an expensive single lens, but it makes up for replacing multiple lenses. Not just on cost, but weight and amount of gear you need to keep track of, how much space it takes to pack, reduces need to swap lenses out, etc. The sacrifices for being a zoom lens type of person vs sticking to just primes and 70-200 is greatly reduced. But if this Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8 is good enough to replace two zooms, both the 28-70 and the 70-200, with just a single lens, that's pretty huge. In terms of cost it's a single $1899 lens replacing $5900 (assuming RF 70-200 at brand new prices for all lenses) That difference in price will probably leave you with extra money after switching systems. But it's really the idea of simplifying tools for the job is what's really appealing. If you have all your bodies and lenses on you, and not have to worry about where to store other lenses in a safe manner that is also easy and quick to access when you need to switch out, that's a freeing thought. I don't do enough gigs for that to matter to me to make that kind of switch. But I can see how tempting it would be if I was a wedding photographer doing one or two weddings every weekend. I'm personally hoping Tamron is able to eventually sell lenses for the RF mount and then I'd considering picking this up and selling my 28-70 f2, 24-105 f4, and 70-200 f2.8. The 28-70 is also my go to lens, but I could see myself giving it up for this.
@@godsinbox I got lucky and punched the 28-70 RF for $2650. I Switched to R5 only last year from owning the 5D Mark IV for 4 years. I got an amazing resale on all my DSLR lenses and bodies and that kept the switch really simple. 1x R5, 1x R, 28-70 RF, Kept my trusty 135mm EF(got a used adapter), 14-35mm RF and a used 24-105 RF. Resale of all of this, 5 CF express cards, 8 total batteries and I’m looking at switching for a minimal loss and almost a break even. 2x A7IV $5k, this lens $1800, the 14mm GM $1300 for architecture and maybe a used 24mm GM $1100. I’m very fortunate that I have a large base of commercial work using me from a rang of events, internal long form interviews, random mid-small DOP jobs and around 15 weddings a year. The constant overheating of the R5 now that my clients want 4K(I was getting away with 1080p for the longest time, sucks I can’t anymore and I need to stay competitive), the 30 minute stop on recording limits and now that Sony has updated their color science it’s really tough not to give Sony a go. It’s really tough switch for me. I’ve been shooting with Canon since the original 5D. I switched from film to digital on that camera! As a 42 year old artist, my friends are definitely giving me a hard time about it. The worst part is, I’ve been a absolute troll to Sony shooters online but that’s old stubborn Dave. I need to drop that energy and enjoy this midlife crisis. 🤓
I recently got an A7 IV and I like both a lot. I also have an R5. They have a lot in common, with great resolution and a control scheme I really like, with lots of video and photo modes fully separated. Generally speaking, I think the A7 IV is better at videos and R5 is better at photos, but that both of them can do well enough at the other that they both feel pretty complete. Objectively, I actually think the A7 IV comes out ever so slightly ahead if you tally up all the advantages. Subjectively, however, the R5 is just so satisfying and premium to use, like I could legit be happy with it for 8-10 years. The A7 IV is a great camera, but it's obvious when you're using it that it's not a flagship. Technically, the R5 isn't a flagship, either, but it seems like Canon went all out. Also, the E mount has amazing third-party glass, but I think the first-party glass is a little underwhelming and confusing at times, and whereas when you use the best RF glass on the R5, it is expensive, but flawless. I plan on getting the 35-150mm f/2-2.8 to be a workhorse to cover everything, but if I really cared, I'd still bring my R5 + 50mm f/1.2 to get the best moments.
@@mbvglider Yeah, I made the full switch. The R5C felt like a slap in the face. I’m really happy with the A7IV. It’s totally a mini R5 and now having shot with both it’s the clear winner on multiple points. 🍻
great video awesome smile! need advice, im a run n gun shooter from shooting hockey games to street photography, debating strongly between the 35-150 and the new 24-70 g master. 35-150 is heavy not the most fun to carry around and missing the 24mm... while the 24-70 I feel like im missing some range.... what would you do? I feel that I like my 24-105 better lolll
I love your videos Julia! Plenty of pictures, plenty of explanations, great background, beautiful models and of course your easy going simple way to explain how things work 👍😎😎
I have this lens, and it is the best for a quick portrait session. I can get all my favorite focal lengths without ever changing the lens, and this thing is sharp! Also great for events, and just about everything except where you need to go wider than 35mm. Pair this with a 16-35mm zoom and you are unstoppable!
I have seen all reviews so far and I can confirm that! Just Informationen for video could be better. Keeping focus while zooming is big. Or did she mention it?
Great review! One thing I was missing about you comparing it to a 24-70 is the utility of the lenses. I find myself bouncing between the two often, so that could have been useful info for some people I think.
Tamron is part owned by Sony, so there is no surprise that some of their lenses perform well on Sony cameras, for whatever reason. Some of their offerings for Nikon or Canon DSLRs have been less than stellar, sadly, despite very high retail prices. I guess as with any 3rd party offerings these days, the right way of going about it is try before you buy.
Thanks for the review. This lens fits exactly the range I need. I usually use a 70-200 but I would gladly give up a little at the long end for the 35mm on the shorter end. I could get away with just 2 lenses with this now instead of 3.
@@einnickname A 14-24 Sigma and this lens. I mostly shoot interiors and architecture but also do some lifestyle. Those 2 lenses would cover pretty much everything I need.
This was a great review! I checked many videos, but they lack the usefulness of this one. The way you showed example shots is what I was looking for. Thank you.
Love this review, as I always do your videos ;-) I've been using its older brother, the Tamron 35-150mm f/2.8-4 Di VC OSD for a couple of years now (which, as a matter of fact, I bought right after watching your review on that lens), and I love the focal length. My main use for it has been events and concerts, and a little portrait photography as well. I used mounted on a Nikon D7500 APS-C. Now that I bought a Nikon Z6III, I am seriously considering getting this new 35-150mm. The price is kinda hefty however (2000 Euros in The Netherlands). So before I'm gonna spend that kind of money, first I'll be shooting the old one on an FTZ adapter for a while to see if the focal lenght works for me on full-frame as well.
You are amazing, you 've literally made me wanna buy this lens with Sony A7III. I have seen your comparison on video and photos it's enough for me to make a decision. Thank you.
An interesting experiment in what's possible in lens design but I'm not sure how many people will pull the trigger and buy it due to the weight and cost. You could get more range with two 2.8 zooms and each lens would feel more comfortable on the camera. For portraits I want 1.8 or 1.4 lenses. Tamron have shown what's physically possible in lens design without actually beating existing options if you're willing to buy more than one lens to cover the range.
Nice Review! Thank you :-) I might ask which video recorder are you using to get the screen capture out of the viewfinder ? It looks very small and practically!
@Julia Trotti I absolutely adore your videos! I'm running a R4 currently, choosing a single lens 50 1.2 gm or this, for travel, street, which would you choose? I'm struggling to make a choice.
Great insight into this interesting lens, the focal length is perfect for my product and fashion work, did u take any shots closed down at different focal lengths also?. as usually do my catalogue stuff around f5.6 ish, just wondering what it looks like at sharper apertures.
Hi Julia! I love your videos, let me ask you a question, How your record what your camera sees while you're shooting? Is the accessory which is clip to the left side of the camera body? Greetings from Argentina
Thanks for this… It seems like a a very solid option for someone who is looking to get into photography/videography . Even makes me wonder if my RFs are even worth it! Especially at the price in comparison to the 28-70 2.0…
This Tamron is no replacement for the RF 28-70. The RF is f/2.0 throughout the whole focal length. The Tamron is f/2.2 from 40mm-60mm, f/2.5 60mm-70mm. The RF being able to do 28mm-34mm at f/2.0 in a zoom is an optical feat.
They are. Image quality, sharpness, CA etc are on prime level or better. But of course with every purchase you should ask yourself if getting the best thing is actually necessary for your work
I think this is the perfect 70-200 replacement for APS-C. I'm planning to use it for hockey and equestrian events. Such a shame that most reviews concentrate on full frame when most of us shoot APS-C.
About the comparison between this lens and the Sony 70-200 F2.8 II, it would have been nice had they been taken with the same body. After all, the A7 IV does have a whole lot more MPs. How do we know the perceived differences in clarity are due to the lens and not the body?
thanks. this lens, for me, brings the A7III to show some weakness in ergonomics: to hold a 1+ Kilo lens with a tiny is quite painfull. much less so on a A7SIII
Technically, a 35-85mm lens is 100% possible to make even at f1.4 since the total range is only 50mm from 35 to 85, however it would not be small and would be the approximately the same size as a 24-70mm f2.8 because of the f1.4 aperture and the end glass element would be huge, similar to the 135mm f1.8... Honestly I have NO IDEA why nobody to this day has ever made a 35-85mm lens, it doesn't even have to be 1.4, it can be 1.8, aperture is not the issue, it's the fact that 35-85mm would cover 90% of the most used focal lengths for 90% of all photography work that can be done without needing a 135mm or longer telephoto or super wide range like 24mm or 16mm. I will be waiting for that 35-85mm until I die...
I found this lens to have a major focussing flaw.. back focus when shooting moving objects in low light situations. I shoot dance competitions and when the dancers are near the audience the focus finds the audience faces and goes from the dancers. Using lock on tracking wide with sticky 0 and it still jumps on my A9 with v6 update. A firmware update needed for sure!
Update: I have changed focussing methods to use the tracking flexible spot and no longer the zone so if i am quick enough it captures the correct eyes out of a sea of them in the audience. Definitely pushing this to the max and it now delivers even more razor sharp images.
“Hello everyone!” Gets me every time. 😀. As usual, great review. As a wedding and event photographer this looks like an amazing option. Especially for outdoor locations and also for churches that are more restrictive to where you can shoot. I am definitely going to add this to my kit. It would be interesting to see how this performs on the new A7IV. 👍📷 Thanks Julia! 🙏
I was thinking the same about the A7IV. But it’s probably moot because if it does that well in the A7III, it’s a fair bet that the IV is going to be even better.
Help! I'm really torn between this lens and the 50mm 1.4 GM lens. I prefer having only one all-around lens. If you were in my spot, what would you buy?
I'm fairly new to photography and have this same configuration. This lens was all that I needed on a seaside vacation. Colors were beautiful even on cloudy days. I plan to sell my 85mm and 21mm so that I am not hoarding gear I won't be using .
I bought the 35 gm and the a74 comes in tomorrow. I he focus breathing is really bad. Debating about returning it and just getting the 35-150. I love the 24-70 2.8 and love the sharpness of the 35 gm but I asked my business partner if she could tell which was shot with a different lens and she couldn’t tell. 😭
@@Marlonorellana I have the 35mm GM now, but I find it too wide for my aesthetics. I'm thinking of swapping it for the 50mm GM or this Tamron lens. I prefer having only one lens because I travel a lot and am too lazy to change lenses. Have you tried the Tamron lens?
@@eddricknucum if you travel I would get a zoom. I’m very lazy myself 😂. I have the 24-70gm v2, 50mm 1.2, and the 14gm 1.8. I didn’t get a chance to try the 35-150 but I have had tamron lens in the past and my clients really didn’t know the difference in my quality except for the 50gm because that bitch is BEAUTIFUL
I absolutely LOVE the RF 28-70 f2, it’s like a prime lens but in a zoom. Great for portraits and weddings. But this 35-150 gives you a lot more range which is more handy for weddings in my opinion, so it just depends on your style of work!
🔴09:51 Mark was looking at the GM 24-70 as compared to the Tamron. With close up it looks to me the GM is sharper. When looking as the stills with close up Tamron looks sharper. Is this my eyes bugging out, does anyone else see this? Again as always A1 reviews Julia!
Thanks! I think the Tamron looks sharper than the 24-70, that lens is super sharp around the 60mm+ area mostly. But the Tamron is sharp the whole way through!
Love the review. I’m curious if it would be better to have a 35 f1.4 on the short end versus the f2 for professional portrait work. I just got the lens and love it and need to do personal comparisons as well. I’m considering selling my 35 f1.4 and 85 f1.8 but not sure if I’ll miss those big apertures or not (yet).
I have both the 35-150 and 35GM, for me personally, I haven't found myself switching in between the 35-150 and 35GM just for the extra stop (although the 35GM is still sharper, the Tamron is sharp enough at 35mm f2.8 under real-world situations), but I did find myself switching between the 50GM and the 35-150 for its beautiful bokeh and under very low light situations. I've been using the 35GM when I just want a lightweight setup, one-handed operation and/or indoors, where I know I wouldn't need the extra reach that the 35-150 provides. Personally, I think the two lens combo of 35-150 + 50GM goes really well together, while the 35GM is great lightweight versatile lens on its own.
I love the response you got to this question! I think it's a great summary of the GM 35 being good when you want a small, light weight setup. From my perspective, I always prefer primes for my professional work - I just work better on a prime personally haha. But during the day shooting weddings I'm usually at f2 the whole time anyway, and I only step down to wide open when it's time to shoot in low light. So yes I think f2 is completely fine and usable for pro work! For my portrait work, I do like having f1.4 available for the "dreamy" look like I was mentioning in this video though :)
@@juliatrotti Thanks Julia, its always a pleasure watching your videos, love how you fill your videos with lots of tips and techniques, while doing reviews at the same time. Yeah, I love how versatile 35GM is too, so I'm actually fine with the Tamron starting at 35, if I need wider I could always switch to a 17-28 or just use my iPhone for the critical moments. But anything longer, may often be lost when changing lenses, like the funny espressions of my dog sprinting across the park using the 150mm end, while I'm taking wide shots of the scenery. I definitely think you should consider it as a travel lens, the weight is less of a burden on a strap and not constantly holding it (using it on a capture clip + slide lite hack, credits to Dunna did it) than hand holding it continously for a portrait session
@@kanaheiusagi Thabks! I read your last comments. I have a capture clip and slide strap, which is my reasoning for why the weight won’t matter. I am curious what the Dunna “hack” is? Is it just using that gear, or is there a special trick to using that gear?
Its a really convenient way to use the capture clip on a camera strap without having to deal with the pd loops hanging off the camera and a much quicker quick release method, which it encourages me to put the camera back on the strap/captureclip more, so there's less fatigue from holding the camera for too long. Try search "The best ways to carry your camera"
Hi Julia. thx for anothre amazing review!! So what would you say... I own a Sony 24-105 f4 G. Should I sell that one and get this Tamron instead? Sony's is a little wider, but Tamron has more zoom range plus is f2-2.8 *confused*
Why do you shoot at a fixed ISO 400 and not Auto ISO between 100-400? And why do you set your shutter speed as fast as if you wanted to shoot animals? I think you want to be sure the lens will not stop down or over/underexpose, right?
If the investment is not a problem, do so. Canon currently has the best lenses on the market (but for a price). But they are constantly pushing out new lenses in both L and cheaper tier plus you can basically use any EF lens with the adapter without any downside.
This video is what all reviewers should be striving to achieve. Under 15 mins. So much information. So useful and well organised, and made by someone who really knows their sh*t.
Thank you!! I appreciate it.
agreed
Basketball photographers will love this. Unless you want that ultra wide look this lens will cover almost the entire game. This + 300mm would be ideal for basketball.
It's really too bad that no one makes 300mm lenses anymore.
@@officialtiimoyour comment didn’t age well
I love your channel for lens evaluation because you show real world results as opposed to charts and color swatches that other channels do. Plus you have a great personality and are a great photographer too.
I got this lens a few weeks before Christmas and it literally hasn't left my a7r3 body. Love this lens. Very versatile. Great image quality
where did you buy it from Tony ?
How's the flare outcome? SHooting back lite also?
I was convinced from two reviews that this lens was not for me because it had questionable AF in low light situations - now with more reviews out it appears that maybe that is not the case. Pairing this lens with the 16-35 GM would make event photography so much easier. And I probably would have less reason to consider the 70-200 GM II. I like the rendering of the old zoom so I could use it with the 1.4x TC for those times when I need more on the longer end.
I would prefer 12-24 instead of 16-35 because having a small gap is not a problem for me, but extra 4mm are making the difference.
You are my favorite photographer for portrait 💙. I bought Sony 35mm F1.4 GM after watching you video. Do you think the weight and size of this lens will be a problem for using as travelling lense? In your opinion if you will choose one lense today travelling abroad, will you pick 24-70 f2.8 or 35-150 f2-2.8. Or you still prefer carrying like 2 lenses 35mm and 85mm. I would appreciate for your opinion.
I second this
I just ordered this lens, finally pulled the trigger. I've been shooting with a Sony 85mm 1.8, Samyang 35mm 1.4, and Tamron 24mm 2.8. I know this is a heavy lens, but I will manage just fine. I've had the Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 on a Sony a6000, so i can imagine how this will be on my a7 iii.
I absolutely trust your reviews and I don't like you at this moment....because your video is now putting me in the market for this lens. My wife is going to kill me! :-)
As always, very informative video Julia! I have a question. Currently i'm using the 35mm f1.4 GM, 85mm f1.8 and the Tamron 28-200 for travel. I want to bring one lens on my next big trip and consider replacing the 3 aforementioned lenses for the 35-150. Would you say, at the wide end, the 1.4 vs the 2.0 is a big compromise? I'm sure I won't miss the extra stop at 85mm, and the 50mm of shorter reach compared to the 28-200 is also neglectable for my purposes. I just love the 35mm GM and am hesitant to hand in the compact form and extra stop of light. What would your advice be? Thanks a lot!
would be interesting to see an AF test between the GM 70-200 in lowlight situations similar to a wedding or concert.
As a wedding photographer I love shooting with the 28-70 f/2.0 RF. This would be way better. I feel like they made this for wedding photographers. I've been rocking debt free for a hot minute. Might have to get this and a A7IV to finally give Sony a proper try. I'm positive if I don't like it, I could sell it after a couple months for minimal loss.
If you do end up selling let me know, I'll definitely be interested
@@godsinbox I'm not the person you asked, but the reason to consider switching is if it's good enough to let you reduce total lenses needed for the job.
The RF 28-70 is so good it can convert people who thought of themselves as prime shooters to replace their 24 1.4, 35 1.4, 50 1.2, and 85 1.2/1.4 with just a single lens.
It's an expensive single lens, but it makes up for replacing multiple lenses. Not just on cost, but weight and amount of gear you need to keep track of, how much space it takes to pack, reduces need to swap lenses out, etc. The sacrifices for being a zoom lens type of person vs sticking to just primes and 70-200 is greatly reduced.
But if this Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8 is good enough to replace two zooms, both the 28-70 and the 70-200, with just a single lens, that's pretty huge. In terms of cost it's a single $1899 lens replacing $5900 (assuming RF 70-200 at brand new prices for all lenses) That difference in price will probably leave you with extra money after switching systems. But it's really the idea of simplifying tools for the job is what's really appealing. If you have all your bodies and lenses on you, and not have to worry about where to store other lenses in a safe manner that is also easy and quick to access when you need to switch out, that's a freeing thought.
I don't do enough gigs for that to matter to me to make that kind of switch. But I can see how tempting it would be if I was a wedding photographer doing one or two weddings every weekend. I'm personally hoping Tamron is able to eventually sell lenses for the RF mount and then I'd considering picking this up and selling my 28-70 f2, 24-105 f4, and 70-200 f2.8. The 28-70 is also my go to lens, but I could see myself giving it up for this.
@@godsinbox I got lucky and punched the 28-70 RF for $2650. I Switched to R5 only last year from owning the 5D Mark IV for 4 years. I got an amazing resale on all my DSLR lenses and bodies and that kept the switch really simple.
1x R5, 1x R, 28-70 RF, Kept my trusty 135mm EF(got a used adapter), 14-35mm RF and a used 24-105 RF. Resale of all of this, 5 CF express cards, 8 total batteries and I’m looking at switching for a minimal loss and almost a break even. 2x A7IV $5k, this lens $1800, the 14mm GM $1300 for architecture and maybe a used 24mm GM $1100. I’m very fortunate that I have a large base of commercial work using me from a rang of events, internal long form interviews, random mid-small DOP jobs and around 15 weddings a year. The constant overheating of the R5 now that my clients want 4K(I was getting away with 1080p for the longest time, sucks I can’t anymore and I need to stay competitive), the 30 minute stop on recording limits and now that Sony has updated their color science it’s really tough not to give Sony a go.
It’s really tough switch for me. I’ve been shooting with Canon since the original 5D. I switched from film to digital on that camera! As a 42 year old artist, my friends are definitely giving me a hard time about it. The worst part is, I’ve been a absolute troll to Sony shooters online but that’s old stubborn Dave. I need to drop that energy and enjoy this midlife crisis. 🤓
I recently got an A7 IV and I like both a lot. I also have an R5. They have a lot in common, with great resolution and a control scheme I really like, with lots of video and photo modes fully separated. Generally speaking, I think the A7 IV is better at videos and R5 is better at photos, but that both of them can do well enough at the other that they both feel pretty complete. Objectively, I actually think the A7 IV comes out ever so slightly ahead if you tally up all the advantages. Subjectively, however, the R5 is just so satisfying and premium to use, like I could legit be happy with it for 8-10 years. The A7 IV is a great camera, but it's obvious when you're using it that it's not a flagship. Technically, the R5 isn't a flagship, either, but it seems like Canon went all out. Also, the E mount has amazing third-party glass, but I think the first-party glass is a little underwhelming and confusing at times, and whereas when you use the best RF glass on the R5, it is expensive, but flawless. I plan on getting the 35-150mm f/2-2.8 to be a workhorse to cover everything, but if I really cared, I'd still bring my R5 + 50mm f/1.2 to get the best moments.
@@mbvglider Yeah, I made the full switch. The R5C felt like a slap in the face. I’m really happy with the A7IV. It’s totally a mini R5 and now having shot with both it’s the clear winner on multiple points. 🍻
great video awesome smile! need advice, im a run n gun shooter from shooting hockey games to street photography, debating strongly between the 35-150 and the new 24-70 g master. 35-150 is heavy not the most fun to carry around and missing the 24mm... while the 24-70 I feel like im missing some range.... what would you do? I feel that I like my 24-105 better lolll
This was legit the best review for this lens! Great job.
I really like you photo comparisons side by side at different focal lengths both stationary at matching framing. Very helpful!
I love your videos Julia! Plenty of pictures, plenty of explanations, great background, beautiful models and of course your easy going simple way to explain how things work 👍😎😎
Thank you!
Not gonna lie Tamron is on a roll! I have their 70-180 2.8 and their 17-28 2.8 and I love it.
Yep!! So good. I have the new Tamron 28-75 f2.8 G2 as well, I will upload a video with that soon :D
@@juliatrotti I can’t wait ! Thank you for replying and always being amazing and in tune with your subscribers you’re awesome !
I m a Nikon user 35-150 2-2.8 is my dream for years So i end up with MegadaptETZ21
I have this lens, and it is the best for a quick portrait session. I can get all my favorite focal lengths without ever changing the lens, and this thing is sharp! Also great for events, and just about everything except where you need to go wider than 35mm. Pair this with a 16-35mm zoom and you are unstoppable!
Best review on this lens so far. 🔥 content love.
I have seen all reviews so far and I can confirm that! Just Informationen for video could be better. Keeping focus while zooming is big. Or did she mention it?
Great review! One thing I was missing about you comparing it to a 24-70 is the utility of the lenses. I find myself bouncing between the two often, so that could have been useful info for some people I think.
Nice pictures, love it when gear is tested in tricky lighting conditions.
Hi Julia, great video! I would like to know what you use to record the camera monitor. Greetings from Italy!
I love 70-85mm the most , the look and bokeh are flattering and gorgeous
Tamron is part owned by Sony, so there is no surprise that some of their lenses perform well on Sony cameras, for whatever reason. Some of their offerings for Nikon or Canon DSLRs have been less than stellar, sadly, despite very high retail prices. I guess as with any 3rd party offerings these days, the right way of going about it is try before you buy.
Thanks for the review. This lens fits exactly the range I need. I usually use a 70-200 but I would gladly give up a little at the long end for the 35mm on the shorter end. I could get away with just 2 lenses with this now instead of 3.
Which two? And for what kind of photos?
@@einnickname A 14-24 Sigma and this lens. I mostly shoot interiors and architecture but also do some lifestyle. Those 2 lenses would cover pretty much everything I need.
Great video！
How is the AFC performance (for shooting moving people) of the 35-150 compared to the Tamron 28-200 and Sony's genuine lenses?
Is this lens significantly better than the Tamron 28-200mm?
You've seriously got the best reviews! Thanks for this. Massive help
The perfect way to start my morning! Love Tamron and love you Julia! Thanks for the great review
great video! thank you. Questions; how did you record your viewfinder?
Great review of the lens I’ve been eyeing this lens for awhile now. I love your outs especially on the green tones!
Yessss!!! I’ve been waiting for this! Thank you Julia 💕💕💕
Awesome review. I'm trying to decide between this lense and Sony 70-200 mark II.
Great review as always. Lens looks like an awesome option 🤩
This was probably the most helpful review of this lens, thank you so much!
I have the Sony 24-105mm F4. Would the tamron 35-150mm be a worthy upgrade if money wasn’t an issue? Thank you
This was a great review! I checked many videos, but they lack the usefulness of this one. The way you showed example shots is what I was looking for. Thank you.
Love this review, as I always do your videos ;-)
I've been using its older brother, the Tamron 35-150mm f/2.8-4 Di VC OSD for a couple of years now (which, as a matter of fact, I bought right after watching your review on that lens), and I love the focal length. My main use for it has been events and concerts, and a little portrait photography as well. I used mounted on a Nikon D7500 APS-C.
Now that I bought a Nikon Z6III, I am seriously considering getting this new 35-150mm. The price is kinda hefty however (2000 Euros in The Netherlands). So before I'm gonna spend that kind of money, first I'll be shooting the old one on an FTZ adapter for a while to see if the focal lenght works for me on full-frame as well.
So I am curious if money was not an issue would you buy this lens or the new Sony 70-200 2.8 for weddings, travel? TIA!
You are amazing, you 've literally made me wanna buy this lens with Sony A7III. I have seen your comparison on video and photos it's enough for me to make a decision. Thank you.
An interesting experiment in what's possible in lens design but I'm not sure how many people will pull the trigger and buy it due to the weight and cost. You could get more range with two 2.8 zooms and each lens would feel more comfortable on the camera.
For portraits I want 1.8 or 1.4 lenses. Tamron have shown what's physically possible in lens design without actually beating existing options if you're willing to buy more than one lens to cover the range.
An 30-85 f/2 would be feasible & little lighter than this 35-150
Tbh , its a great lens for weddings
Covers most of the portraits without busting out apertures to 4 and more .
Was the best selling lens in its class for a year. Backorders took nearly 18 months to clear. I'd say it sold pretty well 😁
As an event and expedition shooter. This lens looks so good
Yep, I really want it for travel!! It's too convenient haha only have to take one lens.
@@juliatrotti How does it keep up in terms of distortion as it is still a zoom lens ? :)
So def buy it over Sony's 24-105?
Nice Review! Thank you :-) I might ask which video recorder are you using to get the screen capture out of the viewfinder ? It looks very small and practically!
I too would like to know this!
It’s an Inkee benbox
@@TEN21Portraits yes i think you are right! thank you :-)
I love that you still use the SonyA7III !
@Julia Trotti I absolutely adore your videos! I'm running a R4 currently, choosing a single lens 50 1.2 gm or this, for travel, street, which would you choose? I'm struggling to make a choice.
Go tamron , hoy have a lot of focals, and then you can buy the 50... I would only use the 50 for portaits...
Great insight into this interesting lens, the focal length is perfect for my product and fashion work, did u take any shots closed down at different focal lengths also?. as usually do my catalogue stuff around f5.6 ish, just wondering what it looks like at sharper apertures.
Hi Julia! I love your videos, let me ask you a question, How your record what your camera sees while you're shooting? Is the accessory which is clip to the left side of the camera body? Greetings from Argentina
Gorgeous shots, colors and skin tone.👌🏾
Thanks for this… It seems like a a very solid option for someone who is looking to get into photography/videography . Even makes me wonder if my RFs are even worth it! Especially at the price in comparison to the 28-70 2.0…
This Tamron is no replacement for the RF 28-70. The RF is f/2.0 throughout the whole focal length. The Tamron is f/2.2 from 40mm-60mm, f/2.5 60mm-70mm.
The RF being able to do 28mm-34mm at f/2.0 in a zoom is an optical feat.
They are. Image quality, sharpness, CA etc are on prime level or better. But of course with every purchase you should ask yourself if getting the best thing is actually necessary for your work
It's worth if you use it. It's as simple as that.
@@thegrayyernaut agreed!!
Interesting lens. Would you recommend on APS-C (a6600), as it basically becomes 53-230 ?
I was thinking about that, more for video...seems like it just great for photography...
I think this is the perfect 70-200 replacement for APS-C. I'm planning to use it for hockey and equestrian events. Such a shame that most reviews concentrate on full frame when most of us shoot APS-C.
Holy moly, this lens is kinda a game changer.
Great review as always!! Ordered mine today. So excited!
About the comparison between this lens and the Sony 70-200 F2.8 II, it would have been nice had they been taken with the same body. After all, the A7 IV does have a whole lot more MPs. How do we know the perceived differences in clarity are due to the lens and not the body?
Because as it says the A7IV file was downsized to match the resolution of the A7III.
Will you be comparing with SAMYANG ROKINON 35-150 f2 f2.8?
Can you try compare between the 50-400 vs the 35-150? would wonder if 50-400 is good for portrait.
I always complained this lens doesn't have cover for the type-c port and you were smart enough to say it's water proof....you are the first, bravo
thanks.
this lens, for me, brings the A7III to show some weakness in ergonomics: to hold a 1+ Kilo lens with a tiny is quite painfull.
much less so on a A7SIII
Hi Julia. When are you going to test the Samyang version? Reviews show it's a better lens than the Tamron but at least 600 dollars cheaper.
As always solid real world review Julia 👍📸
Nice to see more options, an 30-85 f/2 would also be nice & maybe lighter than this 35-150 f/2.8
Technically, a 35-85mm lens is 100% possible to make even at f1.4 since the total range is only 50mm from 35 to 85, however it would not be small and would be the approximately the same size as a 24-70mm f2.8 because of the f1.4 aperture and the end glass element would be huge, similar to the 135mm f1.8... Honestly I have NO IDEA why nobody to this day has ever made a 35-85mm lens, it doesn't even have to be 1.4, it can be 1.8, aperture is not the issue, it's the fact that 35-85mm would cover 90% of the most used focal lengths for 90% of all photography work that can be done without needing a 135mm or longer telephoto or super wide range like 24mm or 16mm. I will be waiting for that 35-85mm until I die...
@@nogerboher5266 Even I am interested for it. Maybe someday I will design it.
I found this lens to have a major focussing flaw.. back focus when shooting moving objects in low light situations. I shoot dance competitions and when the dancers are near the audience the focus finds the audience faces and goes from the dancers. Using lock on tracking wide with sticky 0 and it still jumps on my A9 with v6 update. A firmware update needed for sure!
Update: I have changed focussing methods to use the tracking flexible spot and no longer the zone so if i am quick enough it captures the correct eyes out of a sea of them in the audience. Definitely pushing this to the max and it now delivers even more razor sharp images.
“Hello everyone!” Gets me every time. 😀. As usual, great review. As a wedding and event photographer this looks like an amazing option. Especially for outdoor locations and also for churches that are more restrictive to where you can shoot. I am definitely going to add this to my kit.
It would be interesting to see how this performs on the new A7IV. 👍📷
Thanks Julia! 🙏
I was thinking the same about the A7IV. But it’s probably moot because if it does that well in the A7III, it’s a fair bet that the IV is going to be even better.
Actually, any deficiencies in the resolution will be things that won’t match the sensor of the r4. Few lenses yet meet what 50+ megapixels offer.
I read that the A7iv is better at finding and locking onto eyes plus it can do so with fast moving people.
The a7iv af is way better than the a7iii
It’s a beast & I love the images that it produces but it’s sooooo heavy to lug around
Help! I'm really torn between this lens and the 50mm 1.4 GM lens. I prefer having only one all-around lens. If you were in my spot, what would you buy?
I'm fairly new to photography and have this same configuration. This lens was all that I needed on a seaside vacation. Colors were beautiful even on cloudy days. I plan to sell my 85mm and 21mm so that I am not hoarding gear I won't be using .
Is this better in image quality than the 135 1.8 samyang?
Great review! Gotta say, I love your photo processing too!!!
I just realized you said the LENS has a USB-C port, not just the body. I'm sold.
What is the camera screen recording device you are using?
share the configurations of focus and others you use on A7III, the focus was insane...
Thank you, you gave us plenty of angles, FL across the full range, I now want it ;-)
Can you publish your settings that you use for Auto Focus, speed tracking etc?
Beautiful and beautiful review as well
That GM 70-200 is a beast! that thing looks crazy good.
I bought the 35 gm and the a74 comes in tomorrow. I he focus breathing is really bad. Debating about returning it and just getting the 35-150. I love the 24-70 2.8 and love the sharpness of the 35 gm but I asked my business partner if she could tell which was shot with a different lens and she couldn’t tell. 😭
Any update on this? Cuz im also torn between sony 35 gm and tamron 35-150mm haha
@@eddricknucum what are the other lens you have?
@@Marlonorellana I have the 35mm GM now, but I find it too wide for my aesthetics. I'm thinking of swapping it for the 50mm GM or this Tamron lens. I prefer having only one lens because I travel a lot and am too lazy to change lenses. Have you tried the Tamron lens?
@@eddricknucum if you travel I would get a zoom. I’m very lazy myself 😂. I have the 24-70gm v2, 50mm 1.2, and the 14gm 1.8.
I didn’t get a chance to try the 35-150 but I have had tamron lens in the past and my clients really didn’t know the difference in my quality except for the 50gm because that bitch is BEAUTIFUL
@@Marlonorellana Hahaha now I want the 50mm 1.2!! 😂
What do you mainly shoot, though?
Great video 👌 how did you record the live screen while shooting?
I was wondering about this also. Did you ever figure it out?!
Great review👍
Nikon Z5 photographer here. I MISS THIS LENS TOO MUCH!!
Do you think it would be too large for the A7C?
Julia, do you prefer the 35-150 or the Canon RF 28-70 F2, for a portrait and wedding session?
I absolutely LOVE the RF 28-70 f2, it’s like a prime lens but in a zoom. Great for portraits and weddings. But this 35-150 gives you a lot more range which is more handy for weddings in my opinion, so it just depends on your style of work!
Would luv to see a flare shoot out with your lenses ;) Surprised the new 70-200 GM had issues...
Have you did a video with the samyang 35-150?
🔴09:51 Mark was looking at the GM 24-70 as compared to the Tamron. With close up it looks to me the GM is sharper. When looking as the stills with close up Tamron looks sharper. Is this my eyes bugging out, does anyone else see this? Again as always A1 reviews Julia!
Thanks! I think the Tamron looks sharper than the 24-70, that lens is super sharp around the 60mm+ area mostly. But the Tamron is sharp the whole way through!
@@juliatrotti thanks! Julia.
Love the review. I’m curious if it would be better to have a 35 f1.4 on the short end versus the f2 for professional portrait work. I just got the lens and love it and need to do personal comparisons as well. I’m considering selling my 35 f1.4 and 85 f1.8 but not sure if I’ll miss those big apertures or not (yet).
I have both the 35-150 and 35GM, for me personally, I haven't found myself switching in between the 35-150 and 35GM just for the extra stop (although the 35GM is still sharper, the Tamron is sharp enough at 35mm f2.8 under real-world situations), but I did find myself switching between the 50GM and the 35-150 for its beautiful bokeh and under very low light situations.
I've been using the 35GM when I just want a lightweight setup, one-handed operation and/or indoors, where I know I wouldn't need the extra reach that the 35-150 provides. Personally, I think the two lens combo of 35-150 + 50GM goes really well together, while the 35GM is great lightweight versatile lens on its own.
I love the response you got to this question! I think it's a great summary of the GM 35 being good when you want a small, light weight setup.
From my perspective, I always prefer primes for my professional work - I just work better on a prime personally haha. But during the day shooting weddings I'm usually at f2 the whole time anyway, and I only step down to wide open when it's time to shoot in low light. So yes I think f2 is completely fine and usable for pro work! For my portrait work, I do like having f1.4 available for the "dreamy" look like I was mentioning in this video though :)
@@juliatrotti Thanks Julia, its always a pleasure watching your videos, love how you fill your videos with lots of tips and techniques, while doing reviews at the same time.
Yeah, I love how versatile 35GM is too, so I'm actually fine with the Tamron starting at 35, if I need wider I could always switch to a 17-28 or just use my iPhone for the critical moments. But anything longer, may often be lost when changing lenses, like the funny espressions of my dog sprinting across the park using the 150mm end, while I'm taking wide shots of the scenery.
I definitely think you should consider it as a travel lens, the weight is less of a burden on a strap and not constantly holding it (using it on a capture clip + slide lite hack, credits to Dunna did it) than hand holding it continously for a portrait session
@@kanaheiusagi Thabks! I read your last comments. I have a capture clip and slide strap, which is my reasoning for why the weight won’t matter. I am curious what the Dunna “hack” is? Is it just using that gear, or is there a special trick to using that gear?
Its a really convenient way to use the capture clip on a camera strap without having to deal with the pd loops hanging off the camera and a much quicker quick release method, which it encourages me to put the camera back on the strap/captureclip more, so there's less fatigue from holding the camera for too long. Try search "The best ways to carry your camera"
helpful review, thank you
Hi Julia. thx for anothre amazing review!!
So what would you say... I own a Sony 24-105 f4 G. Should I sell that one and get this Tamron instead? Sony's is a little wider, but Tamron has more zoom range plus is f2-2.8
*confused*
In my opinion if you're interested mainly in portraiture then DEFINITELY!
@@tjvisuals portraiture and concerts mainly, yes. Landscapes occasionally
Why do you shoot at a fixed ISO 400 and not Auto ISO between 100-400? And why do you set your shutter speed as fast as if you wanted to shoot animals? I think you want to be sure the lens will not stop down or over/underexpose, right?
Nice Review! Thank you, Good lens , beautiful model and photographer
Very useful video complemented with nice portraits. Thank you 🙏
nice review♪♪
Julia, you're perfect!! Thanks for all 💘
Best review of this lens so far! Thank you very much !
Please make a video review of SONY 24-105mm lens.
Please make one company video with Tamron 35-150 f2.0-f2.8 vs Sony 70-200 f2.8 ii
I have the tamron 28-75… and the 17-28.. i do video and photo of every kind.. ehat should i do?
would the blue lense flair be fixable w/ any sort of lense filter?
Extra details in the GM when compared vs Tamron could also be due to a7IV's extra resolution.
What made you switch from Canon to Sony? I thought maybe you'd get an r5 lol ..
If the investment is not a problem, do so. Canon currently has the best lenses on the market (but for a price). But they are constantly pushing out new lenses in both L and cheaper tier plus you can basically use any EF lens with the adapter without any downside.
Thank you for this very detailed, informative, and entertaining review of this lens!
I just got it today!! I can’t wait to shoot with it! Such a awesome range 📸