Supreme Court sides with Austin gun activist behind bump stock case
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
- Read more: www.kxan.com/n... The Supreme Court sided with an Austin gun store owner Friday morning in a case concerning whether bump stock rifle attachments convert the weapon into a machine gun.
Stay informed about Austin and Central Texas news, weather, investigations and sports on our website and social media:
www.kxan.com/
www.youtube.co...
/ kxannews
/ kxan_news
/ kxan_news
That was not a bumpstock in vegas. Anyone who says that is a liar.
He used bump stocks to kill people, and that's no lie. You can look at the body cam footage of officers entering his room yourself.
Oh? Trump thought so
Shall not be infringed.
should be infringed. maybe not for you, but for many
well regulated
@@Amir_Nassir You mad?
Tell Trump that, he banned them.
@@moviefan700Yes. That means “well equipped” in the context that the 2nd Amendment was written in.
I'm a big gun guy and I have huge collection. I'm also gunsmith but honestly everything that makes semi-auto full auto is illegal.... at that point let just remove full auto regulation
Anything that causes one action to fire more than one round is considered automatic. I would think someone like you would know this.
@@SharpestBulbs I know but still
@@IvanRossSno you clearly don’t know and that’s the point of removing the bump stock ban we want full autos next
based supreme court
Does that check has a black eye? is she ok?
May the Proletariat be damned!!!
Good!
Dang. Now I have to spend more money
I’ve been to that gun shop haha
Biden can't put together a complete thought.
And this is about bump stock….
still more thought than the covefe idiot
Trump is the one who banned this, nimrod
wasn't this a trump era ban?
But Trump banned them.
Does that mean that he’s gonna take responsibility for whatever happens to people who get killed in this manner? Or does his love for the second amendment go so far?
Its called The Constitution. You might want to read it, and the Bruen decision sometime...
Why would people have to take responsibility for the crimes committed by someone else? You’re not trying to offload some pending court cases against you, are you?
If I sell you a sedan and you go booze cruising after, is that my fault?