It makes any decent shooter slower and less accurate. Especially, when trying to engage multiple targets. If the coward who shot all those people really was using a bump stock? The survivors should be glad because without one the death toll would have been much higher. I really feel for all those who lost their lives, the survivors who have to live with the memory of it, and their loved ones. I hope they find peace.
The beep is only there to give the burglar a chance to run... Not that it would be possible. His grouping with a 44. Magnum is amazing, at least the burglar would be dead in an instant.
The way they function is 100% against any normal standardized training for operating a rifle. Bump stocks were a toy gizmo designed to get around legislation for people wanted the feel of a full auto rifle, without having to pay the money required to actually own one and be on the ATF watch list.
@@JosephArata reality is the bumpstock used in Las Vegas probably saved a few lives compared to a semi with aimed fire.....garuntee he would have been able to shoot more people with aimed semi auto fire. But the rapid fire noise sounds scary
@@jacobishii6121So much this. If a pro shooter had this many issues as a first timer, imagine someone with no experience. I would have said fuck it and grabbed something I was used to but the same is applied to many guns. I remember the first time I shot a 380 having only shot 9 and 45. I was really shocked how much that little tiny gun kicked. Was not expecting it at all.
Joseph Campise correct. For bump stocks to work you pretty much don’t release yourself trigger finger like you normally would and can’t try to control the recoil by pulling the stock into your shoulder properly. It’s almost like a shotgun “push,pull” method of recoil mitigation but with the loose stock forcing your finger to come off the trigger then you pushing back against the fore end with you off hand it basically turns your support arm into you trigger finger. More or less. That’s why you either have to practice ALOT to use it “properly” if your an experienced shooter, because like you said, you go against your basic rifle handling instincts. Which is why it’s a bit easier for inexperienced shooters.
Would make him quite the spokesman for the brace if they took his thumbs. Would need to take his index fingers to hope to bring him back down from superhuman levels of shooting ability.
You need to watch a bump stock in the hands of someone with experience. It's like riding a bicycle. You can't just jump on it and expect to ride it on the first try.
Yes, they are gimmicky and have no other use than being 'fun' -- they are NOT designed for real shootings and to then ban them because they could be used for scenarios of 'domestic terrorism' etc is inane.
Then why not get them off the market for the idiots who just want to hurt people? if they are that useless why let the psychos ruin gun ownership for the rest of us. Clearly we don't need the bump-stock.
@@terrygrossmann2295WE HAVE 390,000,000 GUNS AND MAYBE 30% WOULD BE GOOD FOR US FEW THAT WOULD GO TAKE THE FIGHT TO THE GUN NAZIS TRYING TO TAKE OUR FREEDOM. WHAT WOULD THEY DO WITH 100,000,000 PEOPLE IN A ALL OUT WAR FOR OUR FREEDOM AND I WOULD NOT GO ALIVE.... SO I WOULD NOT NEED A LAWYER
Hi-point does make a pistol caliber carbine. While I can't really say they are high quality. I can say that they function very well. Hi-points are chunky clunky and more than a little funky but they go boom when you pull the trigger. Most importantly they are made in the USA.
@@steventanner1428 I'd still never carry one. I've seen their pistols come completely apart after only a few hundred rounds. Used to work in a gun store, I would always try to talk people out of buying a HiPoint and into something with better build quality, like a S&W or a Glock.
@Sam wanna talk about jamming try shooting a Remington 597 vtr in .22LR. misfires on first shot, if you get it too shoot it won't extract, nor chamber one in.
@@Avus95 You shouldn't talk people into a Glock. That's like talking a dude trying to buy a used car into buying a new Corvette. I only mean that pricing wise lmao
@@Mega-P71 You really think Glock is a "premium" priced firearm? I think their actually very affordable compared to a lot of others. Most models can be had for under $600 and that really isnt bad for what you get, being out of the box and ready to go.
@@ntme9 Religion is non-existent in this issue. This is about ignorant, fearmongering politicians, anti-gun lobbies, and radical activism. The latest AWB legislation is another chapter of Democrats trying to ban as many items as possible without simple and clear definition. There's proof in how they continue to try to blacklist many firearms by name. They also want to ban modifications that were developed in compliance with laws they previously passed.
spyderxtra777 no. I don’t own one either and as a well trained American it would hinder me. But we need to resist and disobey unjust laws. It is not a firearm; let alone a machine gun as they want to claim. This law if allowed opens the door to annihilation of the Second Amendment. Which realistically has already occurred. If you idly sit by and watch it occur you need to take yourself on a reckless boating trip! Real Americans need to get ready to resist and do what is necessary. Sorry if you’re too much of a coward to be a man; that is not the American way.
@@FreedomsLife1776 I'm not sure you understand the meaning of the tounge in cheek statement up there. It's meant to imply that to whom it may concern, be it alpabet soup govt agency or whomever, that any and all bump stocks have unfortunately been lost in boating accidents so you aren't getting them! And also subtlety suggest that they go for a fruitless search at the bottom of a lake.
No one does, a belt loop or string off a jacket does the same thing!! I'm sure you already know that but a lot of people don't. Jerry is a beast behind the trigger!!! Have a good weekend everyone!!
Right. Just leave a little space on your shoulder, hold the trigger finger in place, and push a bit with the off hand. All the bump stock does it give you reference points to make the process slightly...well I found it harder to be honest but I guess it helps some people.
I have never used a bump stock nor had any interest in it but no matter how much the gooberment chips away at our second amendment, criminals will always be able to get one if they want one. Criminals LOVE gun control.
Yup, pretty much, especially since you don't need anything more than a single office supply to rig up one, or maybe more technically a bump trigger. How can you prevent criminals from getting office supplies?
Criminals just drop full auto sears into these guns. They don't give a fuck. These anti-gun legislations are SPECIFICALLY AN ATTACK AGAINST YOU, THE WORKING CLASS, THE BUILDERS OF THIS FUCKING COUNTRY! The government doesn't want armed citizens. It wants compliant, docile tax slaves. They want you boozed up, drugged up and subservient. That's why alcohol, opiates and psychiatrics are given out like candy and it's why they keep attacking your rights. It's why T.V. is so god-awful RETARDED and why you're not allowed to question the cirriculuum in school. Slowly, but surely, people are getting softer and dumber, like the domestication of the cow. One day, they'll just put some oatmeal in a bin and lead people in to have their heads cut off, so they can process it into "government rations", like in the movie, "Soylent Green". And people will be so fucking stupid, they'll just follow along, to their deaths.
Most "criminals" get guns legally at first and the accessories are bought legally online. The other "criminals" that get a gun illegally steal it or buy it illegally from someone who bought it legally. Look at all of the resent mass shootings last year. Find me one were the gun in question was brought in from mexico through some illegal smuggling b/s. The short answer is none, they were bought through normal channels, places where gun laws could have stopped them. If you don't want shitty gun regulation from people who don't know about guns, get involved and propose gun laws that make sense and that actually protect people.
I felt bad watching Jerry struggle with the gimmick, as soon as it cuts to his rifle it felt right at home. Accuracy and speed and control. Learn to shoot.
They want to ban guns period, they just want to use ignorance to make the steps towards that goal seem more palatable. "We'll ban this gun, we'll ban, that one, we'll limit clip capacity, etc."
We know the concert shooting was bump stocks, only because the government said it was. They also said, Russian collusion, Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, and no evidence of voter fraud.
Great vid Jerry! I coined a statement “Ignorance is fertilizer for fear”. It’s amazing to watch you shoot 6 rounds, before the first empty casing hits the floor!! Some live life in minutes, some in seconds, Jerry lives life in tenths of seconds, 😂😂 Thank Jerry!!
The bump stock looks like its going to break. Its all flimsy and shifty. It looks like it was probably banned for breaking and not because of machine gun reasons.
@@michaeltristan The militia is the citizens not the government, well regulated meant well trained and equipped at the time the constitution was written.
The issue wasnt banning the bump stock. It was how they did it. They reclassed it an illegal machine gun when its just a accessory. And all because of one man.
FloppyBeagle 926 Thanks to one person, Trump and the ATF took it upon themselves to reclassify the definition of a machine gun without a single bit of due process involved, and now everyone but the criminals will suffer for it. And now, with the addition of more anti-gun politicians into the mix, Feinstein plans to bring the entire country to California’s level in an instant, in an effort to disarm the law-abiding populace. I live in Canada. I can tell you this much: our authoritarian gun laws don’t do anything. We still have mass shootings, at an increasing rate, in our cities, especially Toronto (we had a mass shooting with over 10 casualties... and a van attack with over 10 deaths, to name a couple, not including gangland violence, people getting stabbed and beaten, and so on). I live an hour away from that city, and fear that the crime will spread north with nothing for us to do in our defence. Our government will continue to blame us, the lawful gun owners and supporters, for the actions of lawless criminals. The RCMP, having been given bureaucratic power over our gun laws, will find new and mental-gymnastics-laden ways to strip us of firearms without any changes to Canadian law based on arbitrary reasons. If anyone down there tells you our laws help us, they don’t. The reason we have less crime is due to a much lower population (a few million less than CA) over a larger landmass; hence why most of the crime is isolated within large cities. However, I feel it will start (and most likely is already) spreading, especially since the populations of those cities will inevitably move further and further out over time. Fight for your rights. Stop these laws from being made. Support the currently ongoing lawsuit against the BATFE. Never take your rights for granted. Don’t assume politicians of one side will inherently support guns over the other; the current president clearly hasn’t done that for you, despite his campaign promises. Always do whatever you can to keep your rights as a citizen of your country safe from further damage, and repair them when you can. That’s all I have to say. Have a good day.
Plus they bypassed congress and are apparently demanding anyone who has one surrender it without even refunding them. ATF promised it was legal now changed their mind? So the consumer is the one who has to pay? Yeah I don't think that will hold up in court.
@@ThatOneFriendlyDude Many years ago, some MEN were concerned about "Taxation without representation" .. Nowadays, MEN need to be concerned about "Regulation without Representation" , i.e. laws and regulations put into place by faceless government agencies that have ZERO elected officials to blame..
When the abcs come to get my guns they prolly send a patrol car. When they go to get Jerry's, probably seal team six. I don't think it will be all that successful either.
@@beastabuelos6421 Maybe? One of the ladies on Biden's cabinet is a big fan of "forced buy backs". I would like to think that wouldn't happen but ya never know in this day in age what to believe.
The silly thing is had they not banned the registration of new machine guns for civilian sale the bump stock would not exist, these were $300+ when they first came out, who would pay $300 for a plastic stock when for $200 on top of the price of the gun (aka $100 less) you could have a factory machine gun?
@Otium Borealis That's missing the point completely, ever heard of ''supply and demand'? Those rifles only cost as much because new rifles are illegal, so the ones that are left are becoming more rare and sought after. If there was no ban there would be no special demand for such weapons. They'd be plentiful like semi autos and a lot cheaper.
@Otium Borealis they are expensive, as a result of the ban on new registrations. The ban in the 80s fixed the supply of legal machine guns in the US. There will never be more than there were then, so the price went up. However, they're not much more expensive to produce than a semi automatic firearm. If it weren't for the law that prevented new registrations, you could buy a fully automatic firearm for not much more than a semi, not including the required $200 tax stamp.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." - William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783
Shortly before the 1986 ban on the manufacturing of new full autos, a maniac did a school yard massacre with a full auto. Before this bump stock ban, we had the Vegas massacre. So our rights are decided by criminals? So we lose our rights to own whatever weapon a criminal uses to do a massacre? I don't remember reading this in the constitution.
Anti gunners are simply selecting which arguments to use. First they know they likely can't win with proposing to ban all firearms or most. So they target certain options. 1.) Target items like bump stocks and use clever wording to get the votes and then at the same time restricting more and more parts. 2.) Target "Assault Weapons" even through they know the statistics that handgun related shootings are responsible for more of the firearm related violence. They will also classify more firearms as assault weapons so more are controlled. 3.) Target handguns using the actual statistics stating "in a new study, handguns are shown to be the most harmful to society" 4.) Target everything else using all sorts of arguments like showing the brute force a shotgun can deploy or the long range capabilities of a basic bolt action rifle and scope,etc,etc. They will tick away at our rights and playing on the ignorance of people that are clueless about firearms and the stats.
Bub, you're simply playing into the propaganda that is being force fed to you by the pro-gun crowd. With the exception of a few VERY LOUD individuals, in DC and in a handful of jurisdictions, the anti-gun lobby knows that they will never be able "come take muh gunz". What DO we want? You people are so obsessed with spreading the propaganda, you won't even listen to what the COMMON SENSE proposals are. -There's no reason the lawful age to purchase a rifle/shotgun shouldn't be raised to 21. -Mandatory, universal background checks, on every purchase, are not the boogeyman that you all envision. Opponents of such, claim that that will inevitably lead to nationwide registration, and, therefore, potential confiscation. Anyone must genuinely be naive so as to believe that the Feds would ever be capable of literally confiscating every firearm in America. And to those worried about "being on a list", your state already has such a list, including every store bought purchase you've made. What would keep the Feds from simply obtaining that information, assuming they'd ever want to? This is all a bunch of crap the NRA has been spoon feeding you, for years. And if you think the NRA is actually looking out for YOUR interests, then I hate to tell you that they're looking out for your money. -"Assault weapons" is a stupid term. Yes, there are plenty of us who understand the REAL definition of one. We also cringe at the fools the anti-gun lobby picks as their talking heads. -Besides being convenient and a novelty, there's no legitimate need for 30rd magazines or bump stocks. Admittedly, getting rid of the high capacity magazines is probably little more than a pipe dream. They're handy, and I can look across the room and see a stack of 15 or so of them, right now, as I'm typing this. Do I NEED them? Of course not. But they're fun to use and they're more handy, when out at the range. Would I ever get my drawers in a bunch, if there was ever a moratorium placed on the future sale of them? Nope. Do I NEED a bump stock? Obviously, no. I've used one one time, and while it had a decidedly "cool" factor to it, it was more than a pain to consistently use, then anything else. And remember, nothing in the 2A guarantees the use of bump stocks and/or high capacity magazines. Even "Heller" said that the 2A wasn't unlimited. -Improving said background checks to include a history of certain mental illnesses. Unfortunately, that's a whole other discussion in and of itself, notwithstanding the HIPPA policies that would have to be taken into consideration. Common sense reform isn't the slippery slope to 1930s Germany that you think it is. Just as common sense immigration reform doesn't mean to either let every single individual come on in or never, ever let another foreigner into our country. There IS middle ground, that makes sense.
@@medicineman360 >Need You dont need anything in life. But you desserve freedom in america. No other country in the world let's enjoy this many gun rights and you'd rather sign them away.
@@fireblazesmobileaccount2607 I'll never be for signing away anyone's gun rights (unless within the law, for things like being a convicted felon, etc). Bump stock rights are not gun rights, sorry to tell you.
@DaMan0203 I have no insecurities about them. As I said, I have plenty, myself. Do *I* need them? No. Do *I* want them? Of course. Will I lose any sleep if legislation is ever passed to outlaw further production of high capacity magazines? Not one minute. Mass shootings were going on before your great-grandparents were alive, eh? Lot of 30rd magazines back then, I suppose? There are no practical solutions, if the pro-gun crowd is ever unwilling to sit down to the conversation. I know that stopping mass shootings is practically impossible. However, if steps were taken, that could potentially stop ONE, would never being able to again purchase a 30rd Pmag be worth it?
Let's try this: Get someone in there that knows how to use the bump stock. Neglect accuracy (just a bad-actor would). Empty a mag in a timed trial. Then, compare it to Jerry emptying the same mag, with accuracy on a single target (making a very small hole no-doubt).
This has already been done by iv8888 and Jerry but iv8888 pulled the video when TH-cam started flagging bumpstock videos. If you Google search it you can still find it reposted by other people.
@@Jay-gy1cy That also shows how the bumpstock was faster, Jerry got the first shot off, and the bumpstock still finished before him. Not saying bumpstocks should be illegal though, because I'm pretty sure a machine gun is still faster.
@@Jrenyar Yes the stock is faster I never said Jerry was I just wanted people to see it has already been tested. I will add though that with out a high speed camera you wouldn't be able to tell which one was faster it was so damn close. Really just shows you how fast Jerry(and other professional shooters) is/are. A full auto ar would be a little faster even then the bump stock but again not by much. The bump stock you lose so much accuracy and control.
It seemed likely that the internals of the bump stock AR may have been that of a low quality product Jerry did say that it was a friends AR or it's buffer tube spring needs to be decompressed or changed out.
One should understand how the bump stock (or bump firing) actually works. What is actually happening is potentially dangerous. The hammer is being released before the bolt is fully in battery and locked. The hammer follows the bolt down its travel. When the bolt locks the hammer is already against the firing pin. That's how one gets the high rate of fire, using the recoil impulse of the firearm to reset the sear and "pull" the trigger. If you have heavy primers the pressure of the hammer against the firing pin may not be enough to ignite the primer. I did bump fire with two of my semi-autos at the range one time. I had the same failure to fire a round especially in my AK. I didn't understand why until later when I thought about what is going on inside the rifle. I then realized that bump firing (while fun) is probably not a wise thing to do. Especially depending on the particular design of the rifle's bolt and firing pin.
“Limp-wristed” failures occur in guns that use blow back to push back the slide. The ar-15 is gas operated, so should cycle correctly regardless of the hold or stock.
Oh wait, the bump stock sucks compared to training? Things are being banned by ignorant fools who have no idea how things work? Didnt make it full auto... Sacrificed accuracy Shit, JM we have to register your finger as the machine gun since you outran it.
Then why not get them off the market for the idiots who just want to hurt people? if they are that useless why let the psychos ruin gun ownership for the rest of us. Clearly we don't need the bump-stock. If you're right and the bump stock is useless then why sell em? Practice like this guy and you will be better at protecting yourself and your family than if you had a shitting bump-stock.
@@35mmpaintbrush Sure, let an unconstitutional regulation change stand, just because it's nothing important, this time. Except it sets a legal precedent to allow executive agencies to rewrite law to fit their goals. Except it allows enforcement of an ex post facto law. Except it allows the government to deprive a citizen of legally purchased property without any compensation. Guess you're right. Don't see why anyone should be upset about citizen's rights, protected by the Constitution, being violated.
@@35mmpaintbrush Because this has been the slippery slope since the early 1900s, with "common sense" gun control leading to higher crime and less freedom for everyone. Those who surrender freedom for safety deserve neither. They will have neither in the end. Now they use gun laws to create complicated trap laws. The goal is clear. Ban all guns. They make no denials with what they say. First it was the machine guns. Then the scary guns. Then high caliber. Then semi auto pistols. Then high capacity revolvers. . . It never ends until you have an Australian style ban. "if they are that useless why let the psychos ruin gun ownership for the rest of us." This mentality is the problem. Ban cars, ban knives, ban everything that can be used to hurt people. Regulate all cars to drive no faster than 60MPH. Regulate all knives to be no longer than 6" and be made of only high carbon steel, since others are hard to detect. Hasn't helped the hundreds of thousands of people stabbed in Europe having those regulations, it has made them sheep and victims. It is not the tool, it is the person. FOllow through punishments for people committing these crimes. Let people defend themselves. DOnt take away the tools people use to defend themselves, like when the Brits tried to steal the cannons from the civilians prior to the revolution.
if someone were to break into Jerry's home, he wouldn't even get out of bed. Jerry's dog is a better shooter than most of the people in the comments section.
One problem with having so many people in your country is that by default a lot of those people will be dumb. They’re not smart enough to research facts and find truth outside of their emotions. They put feelings over facts. They vote based on skin color or gender. They avoid people a certain political party to avoid their ideas being challenged. They are lazy and would rather take money than earn it. If this sounds like I’m describing a certain party, you’re right, it’s the party of slavery: instead of promoting independence, self reliance, and less gov intervention, this party blames others, praises victimhood olympics, promotes segregation, promotes sexism... Meanwhile, everyone else is buying guns to protect us from THESE people!
Hatti Wattti69 I honestly only heard beep bang bang... so I rewatched at .25 speed... and by the time the beep ends he has already transitioned to the second target... so now I have a theory, jerry will argue against full autos, cause they are slower than he is.
Quoting Jerry: "It goes against all the fundamentals..." Nuff said. So much for the bump-stock. Why it should be made illegal is another matter altogether.
Honestly I don't care if it's illegal or not because I'll never use it but I hate when it's blown out of proportion to sound amazing when it's really not
Nah. 75th Ranger Regiment. The true silent professionals who don't need to write a book after every fucking training exercise and a movie about every deployment The truly elite units, are the ones you've never heard of. And sooner or later, everybody wants to get their Ranger Tab
Like many others indicated, I don't own a bump stock, have no interest in one, and don't really care (in one sense) whether they are banned or not. However, I do care that the law is being manipulated to redefine them as a firearm and to make an AR-15 equipped with into a machinegun. This is a problem and a first step in banning semi-automatic rifles again. I am strictly opposed to this approach and will fight the regulation on that simple basis. They are a range-toy and nothing more. Good work, Jerry!
David Thompson you must care. The reason is because of incrementalism. Think about cigs. First you could smoke anywhere. Then they banned it in restaurants. Then at work places, then on air planes, then you couldn’t smoke in bars, now you can smoke with in 25 feet of a door, and in some places they are trying to ban it in your own home. Banning bump stocks is just a first step. Be concerned.
Also a big issue I see is they approved it first and now conveniently change their mind when there is political pressure. Let me remind you this is supposed to be a politically objective government agency. Also they are demanding that everyone who has these surrender them without any form of compensation. That violates the 4th and 5th amendments seeing that the items were legal at the time of purchase. Plus allowing the ATF to change an interpretation of any firearm law at any time they want is giving them way too much power.
David Thompson you should care. It’s not bumps stocks. It’s “rate increasing devices”. So whatever this corrupt government wants to classify as rate increasing devices they can. Say goodbye to triggers soon. Then semi autos. Because that IS coming. I don’t have a bump stock either but I DO care if they or anything else firearm related is banned. They government doesn’t have any authority to pass any laws restricting the 2A. Shall not be infringed!! It was written into the 2A for a dang reason.
"It's just a gadget." The opinion of a man who holds no malice towards anyone and knows more about guns than every politician in country combined. Why should we continue humoring idiots with agendas?
Twitch banned using the word blind in reference to the first time playing through a video game. If they're gonna ban retarded shit like that, they'll keep trying for this. And i guess i have to say, I'm politically left as fuck, socialist. I'm fully against banning anything for made up reasons. Bump stocks are mostly for fun and unless you train with them, it's not going to make you a more effective killer. If both sides of the political spectrum would stop focusing on stupid shit and start focusing on real issues, we'd be on a much better road. But you got the liberals trying to ban stupid shit like this and you have the conservatives trying to give money to corporations and not helping out the citizens who are being destroyed financially by the pandemic. America is a joke.
The gun is not recoil operated. It is purely gas operated which means the gas from the bullet travels back and pushes the bolt back. It can shoot fine without any recoil at all whatsoever.
As soon as I heard his age I thought that there's no way that guy could've done all of that because of his age. Jerry is the same age as Paddock and he's CLEARLY capable of shooting like this
I keep hearing people say they don't need a bump stock or that they're not accurate. Not accurate? Depends on who's using it. I've seen a guy using a bump stock shoot a whole round of bullets on target. You can't expect to pick a bump stock with no experience or practice, and do this. Whether people think they are needed, has nothing to do with anything. There are a lot of gun accessories that I see no need for, but I don't want them banned. Many gun owners take the attitude of "well I see no need for it, so go ahead and ban it". If you take that attitude, eventually the government will be banning the things you think you need. Banning things based on need, is how Australia, and most of Europe, has banned guns. The government requires them to show a "need " before they can own them, and the government decided that 99% of the people don't need guns.
A machine gun keeps firing as long as my finger can hold the trigger, even if I'm dead. This is not the case with a bump stock. That's the main difference.
Not very many. I can't even think of one off hand with that slow a rpm. I am sure someone will inform me of some obscure SMG or something. Still, without target transitions, I bet Jerry could top 600 rpm easily.
@@dsm3759703 The Chauchat fired at 240 rpm, the Breda 30 at 150 rpm, a lot of mounted machine guns had slow rates of fire to conserve ammo, for example the St Etienne MLE 1907 had a fire rate adjuster, from 600 rpm top speed all the down to a measely 8 rounds per minute full auto.
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 2 | 29 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r3lfLNH6Ke4/mqdefault.jpg)
Jerry : Bump stocks are too slow.
FEDS : Jerry is illegal.
You have no idea how hard I laughed at this.
Careful, someone might make him illegal.
God is good!!!°°°°
@@drakeaamold52 God *is* good.
Laughed too hard at this 😂
Can I install Jerry into my lower receiver to make my rifle an automatic 🤔
It would be faster and more automatic. Maybe he is the true embodiment of fully-semi-automatic.
the NFA may allow you to suppress the rifle, but you cannot suppress the “GET SOOOOME”
its called Jerry Rigging for a reason
CorgoDragon best comment today
FBI would like to know you're location
Fun fact, Jerry's Wife had to pay the NFA $200 tax stamp when she married him.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Okay that's hands down the best comment I've seen in a while, let alone today. Kind of adorable
Fun fact his daughter beat his record once he turned around and beat hers in under 24 hrs not even family gets to hold a record with him around 🤣
Too funny
😂 😂
I think the ATF might tell Jerry he HAS to use a bump stock because it makes him shoot slower
It makes any decent shooter slower and less accurate. Especially, when trying to engage multiple targets. If the coward who shot all those people really was using a bump stock? The survivors should be glad because without one the death toll would have been much higher. I really feel for all those who lost their lives, the survivors who have to live with the memory of it, and their loved ones. I hope they find peace.
@@boomerisadog3899 i watched the documentary on that shooting and when the swat comes in none of the weapons have bump stock
@@philthethotdestroyer4194 there's already a documentary on it? I need to find it
Hahaha good one
Cheese Face you can look up images and see multiple weapons had bumpstocks on
Imagine breaking into Jerry’s house and all you hear is “so this is one of my competition setups”
🤣🤣
Why are you wearing a helmet and plate carrier?
John Doe try hard
Heyo! *beep* would be the last thing you ever heard.
That shit made me break out laughing! I can imagine that.
If someone breaks into Jerry’s house all they would hear is the beep of his timer.
The beep is only there to give the burglar a chance to run... Not that it would be possible. His grouping with a 44. Magnum is amazing, at least the burglar would be dead in an instant.
Burglars: *break in*
Timer: Beeeeeep
Burglars: Fu...
@@UNIT294 BANG BANG BANG
Insert criminal peeing pants.
"Ha ha halright we got some live'uns now..."
Jerry can’t be banned bc he was born before 1986.
Sub MOA that actually made me laugh out loud😂
You fucking win the internet today
GOAT
Granfathered
*1886
And here I thought fully semi automatic doesn’t exist.
Legalize the assault jerry
Yes
Fully Semi-Automatic is the Franklin Arms Binary trigger and the Fostech Echo trigger.
Yeah
I thought I was living in C-137, but this Jerry proves it wrong.
The next John Wick movie needs Jerry guest appearance.
No, Jerry needs to be the bad guy. Then that miserable series can finally die when Jerry kills John Wick in the final showdown...
@@thebusterdog6358 I smell contrarianism!!
He should have shown up in all of them, like stan Lee. Except maybe a little more hands on
Jerry shpuld play wicks mentor in shooting training
A retired assassin? Known for firing off quick and deadly? Western? I'm joking of course.
That was an awesome unintended lesson......bump stocks don't work if you use proper technique
The way they function is 100% against any normal standardized training for operating a rifle. Bump stocks were a toy gizmo designed to get around legislation for people wanted the feel of a full auto rifle, without having to pay the money required to actually own one and be on the ATF watch list.
@@JosephArata reality is the bumpstock used in Las Vegas probably saved a few lives compared to a semi with aimed fire.....garuntee he would have been able to shoot more people with aimed semi auto fire.
But the rapid fire noise sounds scary
@@jacobishii6121So much this. If a pro shooter had this many issues as a first timer, imagine someone with no experience. I would have said fuck it and grabbed something I was used to but the same is applied to many guns. I remember the first time I shot a 380 having only shot 9 and 45. I was really shocked how much that little tiny gun kicked. Was not expecting it at all.
Jacob Ishii did u hear the gunfire from Vegas ? I highly doubt that was a bump stock.... sounded more like a belt fed...
Bump stocks are garbage. I don't care if people use them but they cause alot of hang fires and jams.
Jerry: 2 on the left, 2 in the middle, 2 on the right.
Brass: Still in the air just starting to fall
I was thinking the same thing. First shell is still in the air when 6 hits it's target.
Did you see him rock the Desert Eagle .50? Got off 5 and as per Jerry, bass still in the air.
Jerry is also considered a Class III destructive device.
This comment section terrific.
Jerry is a double tax stamp for sure
Your hands are registered bump stocks! 😂
Jerry's faster than bump stocks bro :)
More like auto sears
3:30 he was done shooting before the first casing hit the ground
that's crazy, he can demolish 3 people before the neighbors below him could even hear the casing hit the ground
liubodimaka (359) he is a badass
6 shots in .94 seconds.
That's fuckin amazing.
Yo that ain't human jeezuhz phuck.
Good god you’re right haha. Jerry is the King.
Worlds best shooter had a hard time with a bump stock. And they're worried about a normal human with one?
To be fair it kinda goes against all of his instincts. Might be easier if you don't know any better
Joseph Campise correct. For bump stocks to work you pretty much don’t release yourself trigger finger like you normally would and can’t try to control the recoil by pulling the stock into your shoulder properly. It’s almost like a shotgun “push,pull” method of recoil mitigation but with the loose stock forcing your finger to come off the trigger then you pushing back against the fore end with you off hand it basically turns your support arm into you trigger finger. More or less. That’s why you either have to practice ALOT to use it “properly” if your an experienced shooter, because like you said, you go against your basic rifle handling instincts. Which is why it’s a bit easier for inexperienced shooters.
And that Vegas shooter must’ve been absolute world class
@@11bfollowme19 He didn't even have to pick targets, just sprayed into the crowd like a coward.
@@josephcampise9950 so bumpstock are for liberals?
Best line ever - " it goes against all my fundamentals of accuracy and control of a firearm to get this thing to work" :D
Watch out Jerry the gun grabbers will pressure the ATF to cut your thumbs off to slow you down .
God Bless you Jerry
Watch those thumbs 👀
and he would still be faster than most of us!
Those thumbs were manufactured before 1986... he’s safe!
I'd take a bullet or die for Jerry before they get to his hands to take them from him.... They are his Hands no one else's....
Would make him quite the spokesman for the brace if they took his thumbs. Would need to take his index fingers to hope to bring him back down from superhuman levels of shooting ability.
@@j.m.8193 YUP THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT ,GRANDFATHERED IN..
He’s a real life modded controller
“My finger has been used as evidence against bump stocks” hahahahaha
Intruder:
*BEEP* bambambambambambambam!
Jerry: "Yooooooo!"
Can we all just take a minute to appreciate the fact that for Jerry, ammo counts as a tax write-off
3:20 (whistles) Screw a bumpstock we need legalized assault Jerry's 😂
I'm stocking up too...
KainStrider Jontron?
Perfect!!!
Legalized? Idiot. They have military technology.
@@vitalnutrients744 we can rebuild him... faster...stronger than before
ATF is gonna Ban Jerry’s finger.
They cant because he was born before the 1986 ban
ATF should be a convenience store, not a government agency
Legend has it John Wick is still trying to beat Jerry's best time
Lets be honest, If most people could beat Jerry's worst time. That would be an accomplishment.
John wick still hasn't beat jerry's worst time.
Bump stocks dumb.
Banning bump stocks dumberer.
Nice shootin'.
800lb Gorilla what the fuck
*Man I love me some Jerry Miculek 😍*
Tactical Toolbox ggggkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Tactical Toolbox hi ☺️
Yep!
Who don't?
gayhomo @Tactical Toolbox
Burglars break into Jerry’s house, last thing they hear is a timer “beep”
Bump stocks; a great way to turn ammo money into inaccurate noise
Bump stocks are a great way to scare anti-gunners $h!+L3$$ ...
or just to have fun when all you are doing is shooting.
MrZippy052 that's true! But they also put a smile on your face too and it beats spending 20k on M16.
It is as a suspected. A bump stock has no practical tactical application. It's just a gimmick.
You need to watch a bump stock in the hands of someone with experience. It's like riding a bicycle. You can't just jump on it and expect to ride it on the first try.
Not a gimmick. FUN. no real use other than fun though.
Yes, they are gimmicky and have no other use than being 'fun' -- they are NOT designed for real shootings and to then ban them because they could be used for scenarios of 'domestic terrorism' etc is inane.
@yes Wasn't Stephen paddock, wasn't a bump stock.
Combat wise? No
Holy sh*t! Thank you Jerry! "If it's legal, it's legal. If it is not, it's not. Ignorance breeds fear." This man is a legend!
One could also express that same sentiment about the gun laws themselves. 🤔
Bump stocks are good for 2 things, blowing through ammo and making clickbait TH-cam videos. I'd rather have Jerry's skill then some unreliable add-on.
@hillbilly beer dranker With that line of thinking, why does anyone need a magazine? Can't you kill a deer with one shot?
Suppression
@hillbilly beer dranker Why should i not have a 100round magazine or machine-gun?
@hillbilly beer dranker Why does anyone need a car that goes more than 75mph?
Then why not get them off the market for the idiots who just want to hurt people? if they are that useless why let the psychos ruin gun ownership for the rest of us. Clearly we don't need the bump-stock.
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."
Sounds nice on paper. Do you have the money and time when you get arrested for not following a law you call unjust?
It‘s not unjust, it's just stupid.
@@terrygrossmann2295 thats if they get you alive
@@terrygrossmann2295 Tell that to the founding fathers.
@@terrygrossmann2295WE HAVE 390,000,000 GUNS AND MAYBE 30% WOULD BE GOOD FOR US FEW THAT WOULD GO TAKE THE FIGHT TO THE GUN NAZIS TRYING TO TAKE OUR FREEDOM. WHAT WOULD THEY DO WITH 100,000,000 PEOPLE IN A ALL OUT WAR FOR OUR FREEDOM AND I WOULD NOT GO ALIVE.... SO I WOULD NOT NEED A LAWYER
Me- How many rounds did you fire
Jerry - Yes
All that jamming, I didnt know hi-point made a rifle!
Hi-point does make a pistol caliber carbine. While I can't really say they are high quality. I can say that they function very well. Hi-points are chunky clunky and more than a little funky but they go boom when you pull the trigger. Most importantly they are made in the USA.
@@steventanner1428 I'd still never carry one. I've seen their pistols come completely apart after only a few hundred rounds. Used to work in a gun store, I would always try to talk people out of buying a HiPoint and into something with better build quality, like a S&W or a Glock.
@Sam wanna talk about jamming try shooting a Remington 597 vtr in .22LR. misfires on first shot, if you get it too shoot it won't extract, nor chamber one in.
@@Avus95 You shouldn't talk people into a Glock. That's like talking a dude trying to buy a used car into buying a new Corvette. I only mean that pricing wise lmao
@@Mega-P71 You really think Glock is a "premium" priced firearm? I think their actually very affordable compared to a lot of others. Most models can be had for under $600 and that really isnt bad for what you get, being out of the box and ready to go.
"Ignorance breeds fear" Amen brother!
Just like religion yeah?!
@@ntme9 Religion is non-existent in this issue. This is about ignorant, fearmongering politicians, anti-gun lobbies, and radical activism. The latest AWB legislation is another chapter of Democrats trying to ban as many items as possible without simple and clear definition. There's proof in how they continue to try to blacklist many firearms by name. They also want to ban modifications that were developed in compliance with laws they previously passed.
Next we'll be hearing about the ATF trying to ban the "Assault Miculek"
I DO NOT OWN A BUMP STOCK AND ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO TAKE THIER BUMP STOCKS ON A RECKLESS BOATING TRIP!
fixed.
spyderxtra777 no. I don’t own one either and as a well trained American it would hinder me. But we need to resist and disobey unjust laws. It is not a firearm; let alone a machine gun as they want to claim. This law if allowed opens the door to annihilation of the Second Amendment. Which realistically has already occurred. If you idly sit by and watch it occur you need to take yourself on a reckless boating trip! Real Americans need to get ready to resist and do what is necessary. Sorry if you’re too much of a coward to be a man; that is not the American way.
I also think very few will be properly disposed of but I think IF you're getting rid of one you should bring it down and make them dispose of it.
@@FreedomsLife1776 I'm not sure you understand the meaning of the tounge in cheek statement up there. It's meant to imply that to whom it may concern, be it alpabet soup govt agency or whomever, that any and all bump stocks have unfortunately been lost in boating accidents so you aren't getting them! And also subtlety suggest that they go for a fruitless search at the bottom of a lake.
Freedom's Life though I agree but I still ask. Do you have the money and time to fight unjust laws. Some don’t.
Lmao
Jerry dont need no stinking bump stock🤣🤣
No one does, a belt loop or string off a jacket does the same thing!! I'm sure you already know that but a lot of people don't. Jerry is a beast behind the trigger!!! Have a good weekend everyone!!
Ain't that the truth!
Watching Jerry try to use a bump-stock is like watching OJ Simpson try to put on a glove.
The whole bump stock debacle is just stupid. If i let my ar bounce on my shoulder it does the same thing
Right. Just leave a little space on your shoulder, hold the trigger finger in place, and push a bit with the off hand. All the bump stock does it give you reference points to make the process slightly...well I found it harder to be honest but I guess it helps some people.
Thats not the point. Stupid or not, it is my right to own one if I want to.
ATF wants to know your location
W Winterheart it can be done without any of that. From your shoulder.
If you pull the trigger with your finger, it shoots.
Just saying.............. It's fun
I have never used a bump stock nor had any interest in it but no matter how much the gooberment chips away at our second amendment, criminals will always be able to get one if they want one. Criminals LOVE gun control.
Republicans and the NRA as well.
Yup, pretty much, especially since you don't need anything more than a single office supply to rig up one, or maybe more technically a bump trigger. How can you prevent criminals from getting office supplies?
Criminals just drop full auto sears into these guns. They don't give a fuck. These anti-gun legislations are SPECIFICALLY AN ATTACK AGAINST YOU, THE WORKING CLASS, THE BUILDERS OF THIS FUCKING COUNTRY!
The government doesn't want armed citizens. It wants compliant, docile tax slaves. They want you boozed up, drugged up and subservient. That's why alcohol, opiates and psychiatrics are given out like candy and it's why they keep attacking your rights. It's why T.V. is so god-awful RETARDED and why you're not allowed to question the cirriculuum in school.
Slowly, but surely, people are getting softer and dumber, like the domestication of the cow. One day, they'll just put some oatmeal in a bin and lead people in to have their heads cut off, so they can process it into "government rations", like in the movie, "Soylent Green". And people will be so fucking stupid, they'll just follow along, to their deaths.
I'm from australia trust me criminals DO love gun control. No resistance compliance only yay
Most "criminals" get guns legally at first and the accessories are bought legally online. The other "criminals" that get a gun illegally steal it or buy it illegally from someone who bought it legally. Look at all of the resent mass shootings last year. Find me one were the gun in question was brought in from mexico through some illegal smuggling b/s. The short answer is none, they were bought through normal channels, places where gun laws could have stopped them. If you don't want shitty gun regulation from people who don't know about guns, get involved and propose gun laws that make sense and that actually protect people.
I felt bad watching Jerry struggle with the gimmick, as soon as it cuts to his rifle it felt right at home.
Accuracy and speed and control. Learn to shoot.
Legend has it that Jerry was born with a shot clock attached to his hip.
"ignorance breeds fear". 👍
the speed possible with a highly-tuned rifle, and proper training, is why gun grabbers want to ban all semi-autos as well.
Mr. Miculek is way past "proper training" he's a goddamn wonder.
They want to ban guns period, they just want to use ignorance to make the steps towards that goal seem more palatable. "We'll ban this gun, we'll ban, that one, we'll limit clip capacity, etc."
Have you seen guys shoot a lever action fast or a bow fast or a single action revolver. You don't need semi auto to get high rate if fire.
Jerry is also in the top 1% of humanity in his ability, dude is literally “superhuman”
In my frequent Afghan trips I’d study Jerry Miculek to speed up my rate of fire in semi (my C8 was never on auto) for cqb.
1:34 "it goes against all my fundamentals of accuracy and control of the firearm. "
This statement proves the bump stock ban has no merit.
Right? i saw that too...
You don't need accuracy to fire into a large crowd though. See the las vegas shooting.
Mass shooters aren't gun experts, they're exactly the idiots who would use something like this.
We know the concert shooting was bump stocks, only because the government said it was. They also said, Russian collusion, Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, and no evidence of voter fraud.
@@Ripu2 Why would they lie? Like, what would they have to gain here?
Great vid Jerry! I coined a statement “Ignorance is fertilizer for fear”. It’s amazing to watch you shoot 6 rounds, before the first empty casing hits the floor!! Some live life in minutes, some in seconds, Jerry lives life in tenths of seconds, 😂😂 Thank Jerry!!
Can we take a second to appreciate the fact that he almost had 6 shots on 3 different targets before his first brass hit the ground.
Hell out was before the first brass reached the top of its arc
It's easy
I've never seen the attraction of a 'bump stock', but then again I was trained to use accurate single shots not dump a whole mag per target.
It's for those who like to play video games that have bullet sponges
I love the idea, bit I mostly shoot to make noise.
The bump stock looks like its going to break.
Its all flimsy and shifty. It looks like it was probably banned for breaking and not because of machine gun reasons.
Jerry gotta quit showin' off or they will make him illegal...or at least try to.
@15- AR's we can't all be inbreds
Constitution says "shall not be infringed" the ATFs job is to infringe, therefore the ATF is unconstitutional
@TSC Vegeta Clearly you know absolutely nothing about the Constitution.
@@mike7652 perfect comeback. he couldnt think of anything to say
You forgot the other 80% of the 2nd amendment.
@@michaeltristan The militia is the citizens not the government, well regulated meant well trained and equipped at the time the constitution was written.
@@phillhuddleston9445 thanks for the info captain obvious.
The issue wasnt banning the bump stock. It was how they did it. They reclassed it an illegal machine gun when its just a accessory. And all because of one man.
It fulfills the mission of the terrorists who try to get laws like these made.
This man gets its. It's why and how. No what
FloppyBeagle 926
Thanks to one person, Trump and the ATF took it upon themselves to reclassify the definition of a machine gun without a single bit of due process involved, and now everyone but the criminals will suffer for it.
And now, with the addition of more anti-gun politicians into the mix, Feinstein plans to bring the entire country to California’s level in an instant, in an effort to disarm the law-abiding populace.
I live in Canada. I can tell you this much: our authoritarian gun laws don’t do anything. We still have mass shootings, at an increasing rate, in our cities, especially Toronto (we had a mass shooting with over 10 casualties... and a van attack with over 10 deaths, to name a couple, not including gangland violence, people getting stabbed and beaten, and so on). I live an hour away from that city, and fear that the crime will spread north with nothing for us to do in our defence. Our government will continue to blame us, the lawful gun owners and supporters, for the actions of lawless criminals. The RCMP, having been given bureaucratic power over our gun laws, will find new and mental-gymnastics-laden ways to strip us of firearms without any changes to Canadian law based on arbitrary reasons. If anyone down there tells you our laws help us, they don’t. The reason we have less crime is due to a much lower population (a few million less than CA) over a larger landmass; hence why most of the crime is isolated within large cities. However, I feel it will start (and most likely is already) spreading, especially since the populations of those cities will inevitably move further and further out over time.
Fight for your rights.
Stop these laws from being made.
Support the currently ongoing lawsuit against the BATFE.
Never take your rights for granted.
Don’t assume politicians of one side will inherently support guns over the other; the current president clearly hasn’t done that for you, despite his campaign promises.
Always do whatever you can to keep your rights as a citizen of your country safe from further damage, and repair them when you can.
That’s all I have to say.
Have a good day.
Plus they bypassed congress and are apparently demanding anyone who has one surrender it without even refunding them. ATF promised it was legal now changed their mind? So the consumer is the one who has to pay? Yeah I don't think that will hold up in court.
@@ThatOneFriendlyDude Many years ago, some MEN were concerned about "Taxation without representation" .. Nowadays, MEN need to be concerned about "Regulation without Representation" , i.e. laws and regulations put into place by faceless government agencies that have ZERO elected officials to blame..
Someone tax that finger this instant!
TheTh903 Yeah....a $200 tax stamp for Jerrys fingers 😒
Lucky Luka Im sure they would if they could, the slime..
When the abcs come to get my guns they prolly send a patrol car.
When they go to get Jerry's, probably seal team six. I don't think it will be all that successful either.
*beep*
They'll have to use a missile and hope he doesn't shoot it down midair like AA while using a revolver.
No one is going to come for your guns
@@beastabuelos6421 Maybe? One of the ladies on Biden's cabinet is a big fan of "forced buy backs". I would like to think that wouldn't happen but ya never know in this day in age what to believe.
@@Alphascrub_77 I doubt anything substantial will make it through congress.
That’s what I thought.
It’s an ammo wasting toy.
So have fun.
Personally, I have no interest in it.
It is protected by our 2nd amendment.
The silly thing is had they not banned the registration of new machine guns for civilian sale the bump stock would not exist, these were $300+ when they first came out, who would pay $300 for a plastic stock when for $200 on top of the price of the gun (aka $100 less) you could have a factory machine gun?
@Otium Borealis That's missing the point completely, ever heard of ''supply and demand'? Those rifles only cost as much because new rifles are illegal, so the ones that are left are becoming more rare and sought after.
If there was no ban there would be no special demand for such weapons. They'd be plentiful like semi autos and a lot cheaper.
@Otium Borealis they are expensive, as a result of the ban on new registrations. The ban in the 80s fixed the supply of legal machine guns in the US. There will never be more than there were then, so the price went up. However, they're not much more expensive to produce than a semi automatic firearm. If it weren't for the law that prevented new registrations, you could buy a fully automatic firearm for not much more than a semi, not including the required $200 tax stamp.
@Der Duden without taxes they cost anywhere from $8k-$60k
@Der Duden the tax is $200
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783
Thanks for sharing this
'Goo goo gaa gaa' pitt the youngest, in his playpen at home, December 12, 1784
non essential items banned in stores... wake up everyone
How many people who liked this comment also have unironically said "blue lives matter" in the past couple months?
I love a good quote, prolific
Fun fact: Jerry's trigger finger is always moving. Sometimes it moves so fast it looks like it's not moving at all.
Shortly before the 1986 ban on the manufacturing of new full autos, a maniac did a school yard massacre with a full auto. Before this bump stock ban, we had the Vegas massacre. So our rights are decided by criminals? So we lose our rights to own whatever weapon a criminal uses to do a massacre? I don't remember reading this in the constitution.
Its a Right to have Arms, its a Privilege to have anything extra. People can't be responsible then lose that privilege.
will hicks That’s not how that’s supposed to work bucko. You don’t punish me because someone else is an idiot.
Shane Johnson I also remember when we refused to negotiate with terrorists....
Its genius, all we need to do is have a criminal use an anti gun protester and we will be fine.
@@willowrabbit what's extra? Arms are arms and owning arms isn't a privilege. It's a right.
Anti gunners are simply selecting which arguments to use.
First they know they likely can't win with proposing to ban all firearms or most. So they target certain options.
1.) Target items like bump stocks and use clever wording to get the votes and then at the same time restricting more and more parts.
2.) Target "Assault Weapons" even through they know the statistics that handgun related shootings are responsible for more of the firearm related violence. They will also classify more firearms as assault weapons so more are controlled.
3.) Target handguns using the actual statistics stating "in a new study, handguns are shown to be the most harmful to society"
4.) Target everything else using all sorts of arguments like showing the brute force a shotgun can deploy or the long range capabilities of a basic bolt action rifle and scope,etc,etc.
They will tick away at our rights and playing on the ignorance of people that are clueless about firearms and the stats.
45eno because these TYRANTS are not afraid of the PEOPLE!
Bub, you're simply playing into the propaganda that is being force fed to you by the pro-gun crowd.
With the exception of a few VERY LOUD individuals, in DC and in a handful of jurisdictions, the anti-gun lobby knows that they will never be able "come take muh gunz".
What DO we want? You people are so obsessed with spreading the propaganda, you won't even listen to what the COMMON SENSE proposals are.
-There's no reason the lawful age to purchase a rifle/shotgun shouldn't be raised to 21.
-Mandatory, universal background checks, on every purchase, are not the boogeyman that you all envision. Opponents of such, claim that that will inevitably lead to nationwide registration, and, therefore, potential confiscation. Anyone must genuinely be naive so as to believe that the Feds would ever be capable of literally confiscating every firearm in America. And to those worried about "being on a list", your state already has such a list, including every store bought purchase you've made. What would keep the Feds from simply obtaining that information, assuming they'd ever want to? This is all a bunch of crap the NRA has been spoon feeding you, for years. And if you think the NRA is actually looking out for YOUR interests, then I hate to tell you that they're looking out for your money.
-"Assault weapons" is a stupid term. Yes, there are plenty of us who understand the REAL definition of one. We also cringe at the fools the anti-gun lobby picks as their talking heads.
-Besides being convenient and a novelty, there's no legitimate need for 30rd magazines or bump stocks. Admittedly, getting rid of the high capacity magazines is probably little more than a pipe dream. They're handy, and I can look across the room and see a stack of 15 or so of them, right now, as I'm typing this. Do I NEED them? Of course not. But they're fun to use and they're more handy, when out at the range. Would I ever get my drawers in a bunch, if there was ever a moratorium placed on the future sale of them? Nope. Do I NEED a bump stock? Obviously, no. I've used one one time, and while it had a decidedly "cool" factor to it, it was more than a pain to consistently use, then anything else. And remember, nothing in the 2A guarantees the use of bump stocks and/or high capacity magazines. Even "Heller" said that the 2A wasn't unlimited.
-Improving said background checks to include a history of certain mental illnesses. Unfortunately, that's a whole other discussion in and of itself, notwithstanding the HIPPA policies that would have to be taken into consideration.
Common sense reform isn't the slippery slope to 1930s Germany that you think it is. Just as common sense immigration reform doesn't mean to either let every single individual come on in or never, ever let another foreigner into our country. There IS middle ground, that makes sense.
@@medicineman360 >Need
You dont need anything in life.
But you desserve freedom in america. No other country in the world let's enjoy this many gun rights and you'd rather sign them away.
@@fireblazesmobileaccount2607 I'll never be for signing away anyone's gun rights (unless within the law, for things like being a convicted felon, etc). Bump stock rights are not gun rights, sorry to tell you.
@DaMan0203 I have no insecurities about them. As I said, I have plenty, myself. Do *I* need them? No. Do *I* want them? Of course. Will I lose any sleep if legislation is ever passed to outlaw further production of high capacity magazines? Not one minute.
Mass shootings were going on before your great-grandparents were alive, eh? Lot of 30rd magazines back then, I suppose?
There are no practical solutions, if the pro-gun crowd is ever unwilling to sit down to the conversation.
I know that stopping mass shootings is practically impossible. However, if steps were taken, that could potentially stop ONE, would never being able to again purchase a 30rd Pmag be worth it?
Imagine coming to a video on Jerry's channel, and not seeing an, "Imagine breaking into Jerry's house...", comment.
Let's try this: Get someone in there that knows how to use the bump stock. Neglect accuracy (just a bad-actor would). Empty a mag in a timed trial.
Then, compare it to Jerry emptying the same mag, with accuracy on a single target (making a very small hole no-doubt).
This has already been done by iv8888 and Jerry but iv8888 pulled the video when TH-cam started flagging bumpstock videos. If you Google search it you can still find it reposted by other people.
Jerry vs IV8888 with bumpstock.
th-cam.com/video/Ctz-QH2ug-A/w-d-xo.html
@@Jay-gy1cy That also shows how the bumpstock was faster, Jerry got the first shot off, and the bumpstock still finished before him. Not saying bumpstocks should be illegal though, because I'm pretty sure a machine gun is still faster.
@@Jrenyar Yes the stock is faster I never said Jerry was I just wanted people to see it has already been tested. I will add though that with out a high speed camera you wouldn't be able to tell which one was faster it was so damn close. Really just shows you how fast Jerry(and other professional shooters) is/are. A full auto ar would be a little faster even then the bump stock but again not by much. The bump stock you lose so much accuracy and control.
@@Jay-gy1cy Oh no yeah, wasn't saying you were, just saying it for those who are too lazy to click it.
Anyone else think that the rifle wasn't running right because of the bump stock? Like how pistols won't cycle correctly when they are "limp wristed".
As someone who cannot fire a polymer .45 without limp wristing it, I fully agree.
(I'm trying to practice but I like my steel guns more)
It seemed likely that the internals of the bump stock AR may have been that of a low quality product Jerry did say that it was a friends AR or it's buffer tube spring needs to be decompressed or changed out.
One should understand how the bump stock (or bump firing) actually works. What is actually happening is potentially dangerous. The hammer is being released before the bolt is fully in battery and locked. The hammer follows the bolt down its travel. When the bolt locks the hammer is already against the firing pin. That's how one gets the high rate of fire, using the recoil impulse of the firearm to reset the sear and "pull" the trigger.
If you have heavy primers the pressure of the hammer against the firing pin may not be enough to ignite the primer.
I did bump fire with two of my semi-autos at the range one time. I had the same failure to fire a round especially in my AK. I didn't understand why until later when I thought about what is going on inside the rifle. I then realized that bump firing (while fun) is probably not a wise thing to do. Especially depending on the particular design of the rifle's bolt and firing pin.
“Limp-wristed” failures occur in guns that use blow back to push back the slide. The ar-15 is gas operated, so should cycle correctly regardless of the hold or stock.
The Tomasio what’s a sear sir?
Jerry: *suddenly dissapears*
“Jerry has been automatically banned by goverment’s anti second ammendment system (GSA).”
Jerry's hands are classed as fully semi-automatic machine gun weapons of war, you need a class 3 license to own a pair!
Lol but class 3 license is a joke
I just sent in my form 4 for my own set, we'll see how long it takes the atf to approve
thomas williams Que in the year 3264. It’s finally here.
@@joshwist556 lol hope it doesn't take that long
In Britain, maybe.
Oh wait, the bump stock sucks compared to training? Things are being banned by ignorant fools who have no idea how things work?
Didnt make it full auto...
Sacrificed accuracy
Shit, JM we have to register your finger as the machine gun since you outran it.
Then why not get them off the market for the idiots who just want to hurt people? if they are that useless why let the psychos ruin gun ownership for the rest of us. Clearly we don't need the bump-stock. If you're right and the bump stock is useless then why sell em? Practice like this guy and you will be better at protecting yourself and your family than if you had a shitting bump-stock.
@@35mmpaintbrush Sure, let an unconstitutional regulation change stand, just because it's nothing important, this time. Except it sets a legal precedent to allow executive agencies to rewrite law to fit their goals. Except it allows enforcement of an ex post facto law. Except it allows the government to deprive a citizen of legally purchased property without any compensation. Guess you're right. Don't see why anyone should be upset about citizen's rights, protected by the Constitution, being violated.
@@35mmpaintbrush Because this has been the slippery slope since the early 1900s, with "common sense" gun control leading to higher crime and less freedom for everyone. Those who surrender freedom for safety deserve neither. They will have neither in the end.
Now they use gun laws to create complicated trap laws. The goal is clear. Ban all guns. They make no denials with what they say. First it was the machine guns. Then the scary guns. Then high caliber. Then semi auto pistols. Then high capacity revolvers. . . It never ends until you have an Australian style ban.
"if they are that useless why let the psychos ruin gun ownership for the rest of us."
This mentality is the problem. Ban cars, ban knives, ban everything that can be used to hurt people. Regulate all cars to drive no faster than 60MPH. Regulate all knives to be no longer than 6" and be made of only high carbon steel, since others are hard to detect. Hasn't helped the hundreds of thousands of people stabbed in Europe having those regulations, it has made them sheep and victims.
It is not the tool, it is the person. FOllow through punishments for people committing these crimes. Let people defend themselves. DOnt take away the tools people use to defend themselves, like when the Brits tried to steal the cannons from the civilians prior to the revolution.
“Gunna be a challenge”
Shatters world record
🇺🇸👊🏼 Carry on
>points nose high in the air
>three quick sniffs
> *Smells like FREEDOM*
"Your memory will..." ^
☻👻
my wayward son
Any thugs attempting a home invasion at Jerry's house would have a very, very bad day.
Chuck Norris doesn't call 911.
He calls Jerry Miculek if he has a home invasion.
Three dead dumbasses before they ever knew what hit them. And before they hit the floor.
You would hear a shot timer before you hear the gun shot lol
@@shepherd3085 😂👊
if someone were to break into Jerry's home, he wouldn't even get out of bed. Jerry's dog is a better shooter than most of the people in the comments section.
The gun looks like it is glitching in the intro.
Jerry miculek, the only man John Wick is scared of...
Dude put 2 hit on per targets on 3 targets in 20th of a Second. Wtf.
@@dragonslayerornstein387 yeah I've been watching Jerry for years and years now. he is a beast. haha
He should make a cameo. Would prov ablybe the wnd of JW series tho.
/dislike
Who do you think trained John Wick?
I heard there’s a chance Jerry may have to turn in his trigger finger?
"Ignorance breeds fear" Now I know why the Dem's are so afraid. ;^)
One problem with having so many people in your country is that by default a lot of those people will be dumb. They’re not smart enough to research facts and find truth outside of their emotions. They put feelings over facts. They vote based on skin color or gender. They avoid people a certain political party to avoid their ideas being challenged. They are lazy and would rather take money than earn it. If this sounds like I’m describing a certain party, you’re right, it’s the party of slavery: instead of promoting independence, self reliance, and less gov intervention, this party blames others, praises victimhood olympics, promotes segregation, promotes sexism... Meanwhile, everyone else is buying guns to protect us from THESE people!
3:30 when your 6 shots sounds like 3
Hatti Wattti69 I honestly only heard beep bang bang... so I rewatched at .25 speed... and by the time the beep ends he has already transitioned to the second target... so now I have a theory, jerry will argue against full autos, cause they are slower than he is.
Jerry is the Bob Munden of the AR-15.
He was done shooting before the first casing hit the ground
Quoting Jerry: "It goes against all the fundamentals..." Nuff said. So much for the bump-stock. Why it should be made illegal is another matter altogether.
Honestly I don't care if it's illegal or not because I'll never use it but I hate when it's blown out of proportion to sound amazing when it's really not
Jerry should be in the navy seals, he would clear an entire room before his first shell casing hit the ground
Nah. 75th Ranger Regiment.
The true silent professionals who don't need to write a book after every fucking training exercise and a movie about every deployment
The truly elite units, are the ones you've never heard of.
And sooner or later, everybody wants to get their Ranger Tab
Like many others indicated, I don't own a bump stock, have no interest in one, and don't really care (in one sense) whether they are banned or not. However, I do care that the law is being manipulated to redefine them as a firearm and to make an AR-15 equipped with into a machinegun. This is a problem and a first step in banning semi-automatic rifles again. I am strictly opposed to this approach and will fight the regulation on that simple basis. They are a range-toy and nothing more.
Good work, Jerry!
David Thompson you must care. The reason is because of incrementalism.
Think about cigs. First you could smoke anywhere. Then they banned it in restaurants. Then at work places, then on air planes, then you couldn’t smoke in bars, now you can smoke with in 25 feet of a door, and in some places they are trying to ban it in your own home.
Banning bump stocks is just a first step. Be concerned.
Also a big issue I see is they approved it first and now conveniently change their mind when there is political pressure. Let me remind you this is supposed to be a politically objective government agency. Also they are demanding that everyone who has these surrender them without any form of compensation. That violates the 4th and 5th amendments seeing that the items were legal at the time of purchase. Plus allowing the ATF to change an interpretation of any firearm law at any time they want is giving them way too much power.
David Thompson you should care. It’s not bumps stocks. It’s “rate increasing devices”. So whatever this corrupt government wants to classify as rate increasing devices they can. Say goodbye to triggers soon. Then semi autos. Because that IS coming. I don’t have a bump stock either but I DO care if they or anything else firearm related is banned. They government doesn’t have any authority to pass any laws restricting the 2A. Shall not be infringed!! It was written into the 2A for a dang reason.
Actually the ATF ban only applies to bump stocks... for now
And also bump grips those are a thing too. Anything that has a finger shelf and slides back and forth
Any accessories/gadgets that are banned is a loss of Freedom.
Let me get those fuckin A bombs you dipshit goverment!
I want my grenade launcher back!
Zachary Smith you can legally own grenade launcher’s in some states.
@@troblezgaming9751 What about an atom bomb for strictly home defense?
Jebu911 hahaha not so sure about that one chief.
"It's just a gadget."
The opinion of a man who holds no malice towards anyone and knows more about guns than every politician in country combined. Why should we continue humoring idiots with agendas?
Twitch banned using the word blind in reference to the first time playing through a video game. If they're gonna ban retarded shit like that, they'll keep trying for this. And i guess i have to say, I'm politically left as fuck, socialist. I'm fully against banning anything for made up reasons. Bump stocks are mostly for fun and unless you train with them, it's not going to make you a more effective killer. If both sides of the political spectrum would stop focusing on stupid shit and start focusing on real issues, we'd be on a much better road. But you got the liberals trying to ban stupid shit like this and you have the conservatives trying to give money to corporations and not helping out the citizens who are being destroyed financially by the pandemic. America is a joke.
@@beastabuelos6421 don't forget the Tik Tok girls bro. I fr really hate my generation sometimes
Any half a retard knows more about guns than every politician combined
Do not, I repeat DO NOT break into Jerry's home lmao
To all current worthless thieves, please by all means, DO IT!
You got a better chance of breaking into Area 51
Fahad Shahid true words my friend
The last person who ever needs a bump stock.
Jerry's laugh is incredibly similar to Joerg's in the attitude it holds.
1:30 - and watch subtitles
it goes against all my fuck to medals
It doesn't have a side order.
I guess his gunshots really are music
I hope you get to keep your finger.
This video is proof that bump stocks should be legal 😂
If we want to giggle and shoot one target? That's hilarious!
The bump stock is bad it takes the recoil needed to eject the shell and uses it to fire again which jams
The gun is not recoil operated. It is purely gas operated which means the gas from the bullet travels back and pushes the bolt back. It can shoot fine without any recoil at all whatsoever.
Jerry the type of guy to get reported for hacking IRL.
There is no way that Vegas shooter used a bump stock.
meditech worlds best gun handler can’t use one... what does that say.
@@MechInvent was thinking the same.
As soon as I heard his age I thought that there's no way that guy could've done all of that because of his age. Jerry is the same age as Paddock and he's CLEARLY capable of shooting like this
magadon ruferto the noise you hear is just the echo coming off the building
More like staged by the dems and anti gunners!
BAN THESE HANDS
Ignorance breeds fear bares repeating. This is probably the best explanation for most of today's problems. Thank you Jerry.
Always fun to watch the master at work Thanks for sharing
I keep hearing people say they don't need a bump stock or that they're not accurate. Not accurate? Depends on who's using it. I've seen a guy using a bump stock shoot a whole round of bullets on target. You can't expect to pick a bump stock with no experience or practice, and do this. Whether people think they are needed, has nothing to do with anything. There are a lot of gun accessories that I see no need for, but I don't want them banned. Many gun owners take the attitude of "well I see no need for it, so go ahead and ban it". If you take that attitude, eventually the government will be banning the things you think you need. Banning things based on need, is how Australia, and most of Europe, has banned guns. The government requires them to show a "need " before they can own them, and the government decided that 99% of the people don't need guns.
A machine gun keeps firing as long as my finger can hold the trigger, even if I'm dead. This is not the case with a bump stock. That's the main difference.
you break into jerrys house and all you hear is "beep"
That’s a nice machine gun ya got there -ATF
Jerry fired accurately at 360 rpm, faster than a lot of automatic weapons lol.
Jerry Miculek is John Wicks father
Not good, Jerry's finger is now banned from all black gun styles
LOL, bumb-stock is a toy for amateurs, BUT it is NOT illegal!🇺🇸
They will be soon enough, what we do next is the real test
94 hundredths of a second. Wow
Who knew a bumpstock would only limit Jerry’s power
Jerry fired accurately at 360 rpm, faster than a lot of automatic weapons lol.
Not very many. I can't even think of one off hand with that slow a rpm. I am sure someone will inform me of some obscure SMG or something. Still, without target transitions, I bet Jerry could top 600 rpm easily.
@@dsm3759703 The Chauchat fired at 240 rpm, the Breda 30 at 150 rpm, a lot of mounted machine guns had slow rates of fire to conserve ammo, for example the St Etienne MLE 1907 had a fire rate adjuster, from 600 rpm top speed all the down to a measely 8 rounds per minute full auto.
@@AntonEugeneLanthier but mind you these are 100 years old and pretty much just the 2
@@hunterprokurat9909 fair enough.
Auto shotguns. Thats about it. Even then I dont think many reach 360 as the AA12 tops out at 300