What Did BBB NOT Tell You About Council Tax Liability Orders
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2024
- Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
"Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
(Bill of Rights 1688)
Law is the people’s birth right.
(Act of Settlement 1700)
All are equal under the law.
No one is above the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
---------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
-----------------------------------------------------------
![🔴 [TRỰC TIẾP] U20 Thái Lan VS LPBank Ninh Bình | Cúp VTV9 - Bình Điền 2024 | JET STUDIO](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3wRNdAy3DXs/mqdefault.jpg)
How come I’ve been to court to answer an allegation of non payment, only to be shown to a smallish room with 3 other defendants and are questioned by council employees?…… no judges, magistrates, court clerks or officials present.
It’s the council employees that decide the fate of the accused.
As to whether the council actually pay for the room in question is neither here nor there ( hiring), the fact that no court official is present is the real fraud
These people think that clean hands is going to win they are living in cuckoo land 3 years later and still waiting ,bet they pay there ct while others loose there property’s .
The council is a corporation, so a business employee interviewed you in reality. Do we have contracts with these corporations for specific services? Did they threaten you to pay up?
I've been there too even though I owed nothing (paid late)I just owed court charges. I never paid and as I told them it would disappear from our account. it did.
The court is actually a private tribunal you can withold consent from, and reserve your own jurisdiction via Special Appearance.
Best to reject the 'summons' first, send it straight back to the council with a rebuttal of the 12 presumptions of law, as 'dead paper', Rejected.
@@G-ra-ha-m could you give some detail on the grounds for rejecting the summons?🤝
The statute to pay CT comes from a democratically elected parliament, if it can be shown we do not live in a democracy but a parliamentary dictatorship (as is the real case) then does the statue still stand🤔 does this help to rebut the demand for payment🤔Our entire system is openly corrupt from top to bottom🙃🙂
There's no statute saying we have to pay, just a liability arising for the crime of living inside a 'dwelling'. Yes: That's now illegal, unless you pay. Welcome to free England LOL.
@@G-ra-ha-m 👍🤝
If you are one of the PERSONS comprising the UK Body Politic, then you as the lawmaker (through representation by an MP) have consented to abide by the statutes of that Polity and are bound to do so, however it is not an absolute that you are such a PERSON, though at some point by some act, instrument or even by inaction you most likely left the territorial jurisdiction of the People of Great Britain to whom the Monarch has a duty to serve and the Police a duty to protect and you entered the corporate jurisdiction of the 'United Kingdom' (of Great Britain) ...but this is not an absolute and irrevocable act it can be undone, and if you have never voluntarily placed yourself under that Jurisdiction then the Burden of Proof lies upon the party who claims you are 'of' that jurisdiction as opposed to 'of' the other jurisdiction which is where Law is, which is where the KJV 1611 is of central importance. If you doubt this i suggest you watch both the coronation oaths of both Elizabeth and Charles and pay attention to what is being said.
@@genuinearticle33 I wrote an email to my council asking to be removed from the entire electoral register which they did and didn't rebutt any of the points raised by me.
According to the government I couldn't be removed but it has been done.
King sausage fingers can't act in his sovereign capacity due to his ties with the WEF so is illegitimate along with our corrupt government .
I feel at present the intire apparatus has no legitamacy due to endemic levels of corruption.
BBB guy goes on and on about laws against we the people, Has he ever complained about the laws government have been breaking??? He should take your course! 🙏
He has a BAR oath: he's the enemy.
@@G-ra-ha-mbar inns are unincorporated
All men inverted free😂 the whole establishment is controlled by the funny hand shake men. Especially the city of London...
regardless of how much knowledge you have, on this subject..they just ignore it ,!!
then sue them!
where is the civil.court judgement? let alone the liability order
Great to see your videos as ever, chaps.
Let us know when you have a court judgment and we will take a look!
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel You're joking right? Murder, theft, criminal damage, fraud is buying and selling goods is it???
I went into court during covid, with section 13a reduction....The judge agreed it should be granted. The council then said no, after the court case, and claimed a LO was granted... ..fraud
and what happened
The whole charade is to claim they have a liability order: But they can never prove they have one for you. Checkmate :)
Write to them and ask the flipping Council to show you the law not Statutory law which states your obligation to pay. Write to the CEO say you will pay once he/she sends you this law not legal writings. Send in brown envelope,registered so you can track it. Simple don't say I'm withholding Council tax until I hear from youse and satisfied.
I wrote to the court after being given a liability order and they stated there was no liability order in my name from same said court....
same here !!!!
It's the same with the court summons, if you contact the courts they will say there's no court summons in your name & address at the court, but on the day in question a list with people's name on it suddenly exists, so if you write to the courts before the summons date, the court will write back saying there's no summons in your name, send that to the council. Now you have proof of this fraud, why would anyone go to a court summons that doesn't exist ?
They lied. Play under section 66 of the magistrates Court Act for a memorandum of entry copy then you will get it
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 - actually "these two" have explained it very thoroughly.
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 "these two" have done two videos on the "evidence of the order", referred to FOIs on WDTK, have updated the enforcement notice and are working on an updated council caution notice - take a look, you may learn something.
Thank you once again Brian and Marc really do appreciate all the time and effort you both apply
Thank you guys . Making mental and physical notes on every video. Love it
Cant i send a demand to the Council for repayment of payments i have payed
I feel it is very unfair to assume the human race is basically lazy when people work hard everyday just to survive in this system, people just don’t have the time. Most have so much to do that we don’t know if we’re coming or going sometimes. No time to think most of the time. Misinformation disinformation how can one know if the cannot research because of lack of time.
That’s the highlight for you in this video??
@@asmith6931 your problem is?
@@asmith6931 of course not! This was just something I felt strongly about as is important not to underestimate people, they just need some compassion and a little extra help to make them come on board.
Calling people lazy is not an inspiring motivational thing to say.
Perhaps the process on how to get started would attract more to give this a go.
If the paperwork is easy to prepare ready to present through the stages it is much easier to bring people online, so to speak.
Thanks for knocking on the head the idea that the councils hire a room in the court for liability hearing. I have sat in Derby magistrates court and seen LO hearings in the same sessionas DVLA non payment and child kept off school offence. Confirm that the court manager told me that the councils, 5 use Derby, that they have an account and when they apply and get permission to send out summonses they are billed 50p for each.
50p each. Then charge £100...great profit margins at the price of people who cant actually afford it.
Then drag them through court
So if parliament etc admit all this corruption and not being law etc, why aren't they all in prison for wilful fraud?
Come on why do ya think?
Magistrates courts need to be recorded so transcripts can be made.
there's always a hole in BBB's arguments though and its usually a big obvious ones
bbb always gives the Grand view of his Master.
He works for the 'bar' so speaks for them but Magistrates is different bullshit
I can attest from experience that judges do not understand Equity. They largely act like robots giving judgements against Acts regardless of whether the square peg fits the round hole or not.
My judge even refused to affirm they were acting under their oath and could not define how the court had jurisdiction in the matter.
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 well, I do, as I have written it into the court statements as “for and on the record”.
Our disability is our lack of authority in the eyes of the executive/judiciary racket. They just press along regardless and take enforcement that ticks their boxes.
We can’t do this full time like they can, we have other jobs to keep us afloat. So they take advantage of our disability.
Fantastic! Beautifully explained and summarised! Thanks, Marc and Brian!
It's worse than we could imagine, the courts are complicit.
The courts also need to change the verbiage on what is allegedly "their summons" for council tax which is nothing more than malicious communications containing threats of menaces and defining how we are able to defend ourselves, omitting that we can question the costs are "reasonably incurred".
"Person" is minutiae, while the "strawman" argument is losing its foothold. The controlled opposition is clutching at 'straws' - forgive the pun.
Let's be honest here, the legal fiction has been made almost impossible to remove from the physical man/woman now and that is of our own making.
How many would be willing to surrender the benefits they gain from their legal fiction, when they realise the extent of that surrender? I believe they would be very surprised.
Until we can restructure the current social, economic and political system the legal fiction serves its purpose.
The argument is, what right does anyone have to tax us on our homes, our inalienable right to shelter from a pretty shoddy English environment? It's positively feudal.
I'm not going away. This murderous, criminal and corrupt parliament assembled want money from me just for living in my home, they must kill me - just like they did my mum.
What are you saying that the legal person is bound to the man or woman ,
Please explain
@@user-bq3og5pz9w I'm suggesting that, in our current situation, to divorce yourself entirely from any legal fiction would leave you without a passport to travel, unable to apply for a mortgage or any benefits, to name but a few examples.
So, what is the answer? How do you portray your argument in court? Remember, hearsay, assumptions and presumptions are not evidence. Going into court without evidence is like a lamb walking into a lion's den. You will be slaughtered.
The answer is securities, trusts and your piece of the pie (the estate). Learn about them and you become the lion. Remember, they are humans as well, and they have made the assumption you are the lamb.
All registrations, court orders, licences and whatnot are financial instruments, securities... Remember, it's not the governments or the judicial arm in control, it's the banks. Show me the incentived, and I'll tell you the outcome. Show me the money. Aka, who is the owner.
Example 1 on how not to bind to your legal name.
1. Be prepared. Get your certificate of entry in place. Make sure you have the following in order.
1.a. 3 witnesses that the info on the CoE is you.
1.b. get your mother to make you the PoA on the CoE trust. (This is the best approach)
1.c. or send 15*3 letter to heads of government departments asking if there is a lien on the estate and if they see a reason why they should at anytime in the future be the grantor of the the trust and estate. Make sure you send via recorded sign mail. And collect as much evidence of the reordered mail. It's all evidence.
1.d. Get a copy of your birth certificate.
1.e. take a copy of all those documents and letters. Give to court as official evidence before court day.
All this proves you are the lawful person written on the CoE. Not just some Tom, Dic or Harry holding a piece of paper. Evidence is ammunition.
2. Now you go in as the creditor... as the Lion.
2.a. sign in as the attorney for the BC trust name.
2.b. before you cross that bar. And this is where a lion must stand his ground. You announce.
"See the Birth Certificate I hold in my hand? It is not evidence of my identity, but evidence I have and hold an interest in the foundation security of the estate" and point to the certificate of entry.
You have just announced you are the creditor. You hold the lien. Game over for the Judge. If he calls your bluff. You have presented all the information/evidence as court of record. His position is the only one that remains, his trust becomes the trustee for the case.
It's all about who is the owner. Owner pays. Learn about securities and the endorsement process. Know this and you are King.
Why are your so called public servants (employees) threatening you in the first place.
Who's the employer who's the employee?
Who's the master Who's the servant
You guys are awesome! Thanks for the great work
One of the best informative videos iv watched for awhile..it was well laid out..as I work my dealings with court via private trust..I can now understand a few things iv not heard..and now have a direction of travel...thank you
thank you, again.
Nicely put Brian and Marc
So the defence to council tax is basically the processes in the courts are not proper, as there is no legal summons, court procedure and liability order?
The lack of signature and verifiable name next to it is one failure. Fraud.
No individual record of each case...bulk orders not legal.
So if the liability orders are used to create a charge on a property its illegal?
Thats what I am basing my case on.
A demand is not a valid contract....
There is no fraud unless you can prove mens rea
Where is your evidence that "bulk orders (are) not legal" please?
Ha ha because each case has to be dealt as and individually case you mad head
@@carolinecblackburn to quote marc - the orders are created by the judge, having the evidence they need to evaluate the evidence which is given on testimony. [but] the problem with this whole thing lies in that the order is created or spoken into existence - there are a number of problems that daniel didnt address with this, this in essence [he rightly pointed out [?]- .... only those people who were present can verify its existence ...
also have govt agents been permitted to act above the law?? my limited understanding is any claim made against another has to be evidenced. so where there is no evidence CT IS A LAWFUL TAX therein lies the fact bulk orders are not legal. each named person has the right to attend the court in defence of the claims laid against them [for CT or ANY other claim]
I believe the council tax you as living in a dwelling (slave) and not a house, which is not taxable, is that right?
Marc, you say the judge/magistrate allows the liability order after the evidence , are you referring to the evidence the council gives, because it should be a two way street, but I’ve been to court over council tax many times and more often than not when I try to say my bit I’m shut down and the judge/magistrate always say we’re not here to discuss or words to that effect.
Make an official complaint to court about their conduct and start holding these asshats to account, then sue them.
You need to identify the duty (see magistrates court civil rules, rule 14) they present evidence, you have right to cross examine, then you present your evidence and they have right to cross examine...
If they breach their duty by not following the rules = a breach of duty = void order = you sue for damages...
I have tried many times they gang up and talk over you, plus you have to go through the system to get at them there are so many locked doors , (bates V the post office) 20 years
@@marchorn466 thank you for that Marc, believe me I have tried that even to the point of going to prison. I’ve even quoted civil court rules, I even took a copy with me to the court. The council have now written to me again after a long period. I think it’s a lead up to another court appearance and maybe a custodial sentence
@@marchorn466 council tax hearings aren't under magistrates court act. So they are not actual magistrates during a CT hearing. It's fraud.
We’re not going away 😉
Talking of bait and switch, as I understand it, when a demand notice is sent out, some councils are still sending bills which is incorrect, the notice is addressed to the property. This is evidenced by if you make complaint to the council they refer you to the valuation officer. As we know a property doesn't have bank account or any other way of paying. It is only when you don't/can't pay that you receive a LO thereby transferring the debt form the property address to the occupant who then becomes a debtor. Great video, thank you.
brilliant
When presenting a discussion or an argument on particular subjects pertaining to peoples rights and points of law, then for sure you should leave the floor open for questions... Not responding or refusing to respond to a particular question which has been raised does not in anyway support your discussion or argument....
The parlimentry acts are passed to the house of lords for validation , is this relevent to the situation ?
Most people are not IMO lazy, but either so busy there is no time to look at the intentionally complex and hard to find 'laws' or due to the fact that they are honest believe the systems we operate in are honest and also just. Of course this is increasingly being shown not to be true.
But how do you attend court when the court hasnt sent a summons? The council have and then when you contact the court they have no record of a case against you on said time date?
where is the civil court judgement?
BBB
bbb
666
Just like Build Back Better.
Regardless of whether or not information is publicly available (But not talked about) or not, if one does not disclose with full transparency everything one are doing, then that is fraud - SIMPLE!
One can't be blamed for what they didn't know, especially when those who had the duty to disclose that knowledge, didn't and carried on regardless with their obfuscation.
well done guys
Please explain why, when, after a so called Hearing, if you request a "Certified copy of the case file" through a Data Subject Access Request, they cannot provide one, even though it is law?
You have access to court records under the MCR civil rules direct...
You're not going away as you have to keep everyone penned in.
What exactly are you suggesting?
There are no liability orders...
So the Lo is not a judgement that is enforceable by court.???
If its not rented why does the court not hold records of the case and why wont the judge put their name to it, and why cant the coucil produce official court paperwork, what gives the wtight for a council to send summons?
What are you referring to at 32:29 when you say section 35.6?
Marc and Brian do you pay council tax?i and how far have you gone with enforcement and the liability orders ?
@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 be nice if Brian and Marc can answer the question themselves?
BTW I have been withholding my ct for 2 years
I tried to ask that question and got abused on their group!!! Very odd how defensive they became .. why aren’t you all transparent
@larrajohnson881 I am now thinking the same all the videos they make why not just answer the question?
I have nothing to hide i don't agree with council tax thats why i withhold my money I think its fraudulent how it's forced on people and very wrong how people pay to have a roof over there heads
Ok riddle me this "I have paper proof of a notice of liability that was printed the day before my so called court date".
Was it, or was the list printed by the council the day before the court hearing and submitted to the mags on the day of the hearing which was the next day and they simply signed the council's printout?
could i employ a solicitor to represent me for a vacant house and having to pay double in Cardiff
Thank you for your email.
I have attached a document which covers all your points in query.
An arrangement has been set to pay £25 a month from the end of April 2024, while you are in receipt of Universal Credit and this will be reviewed in March 2025. You can pay at any post office or pay point with the barcode on the bill. Pleaser be advised if you do not pay your Council Tax, an Attachment of Benefits can be issued as a mode of recovery action to recover the debt.
Whilst i agree with all being said regards issues around an actual LO...doesn't really help us if we've not paid and we work, have carscetc and bailiffs attend...clamp cars, scene caused, embarrassment, stress, late/held from work etcetc....
What law trumps what law, statutory or common law?
so when are the magistartes going to be arrested.
Hello. I have that feeling that all that beef will end bad for us the people. Why don't Let him have last word and send on his way with feelings of achievement and keep doing what you doing.
I really struggle taking information in from Mark..
me too.
It seems to me that what you say regarding the protocols in court and the procedures are correct... That's a given - Unfortunately this is NOT what is happening in the real world...... There are so many testimonials and looking at some of the comments seems to agree ...!!!
All equal under the law? In practise we see how that works by espousing one name Tony Blair.
35 6 is the key then? Its not enforceable through the courts...Its a debt but not a debtor?
U.K. Column news are now talking about unlawful tax.Thats 31/1/24
you might want to think about improving the quality of your telegram channels, peacekeepers... there's unfair instant banning going on by unhinged moderators in there who aren't following the 3 strike and you're out rules. They are making your community about as accessible as virgin media's cancellation line.... if newcomers feel like they can't express a thought, they won't engage and they won't support your cause.. also, it's at odds with the principles you guys are fighting for ... have a good day 🎉
There are rules to the NOCNOC channel, the aim of which is to share evidence and to get assistance on the NOC process from the members - there are plenty of other channels where you may "express a thought".
There is a dispute process in place if you believe you were treated unfairly.
@@carolinecblackburn are you trying to convince me or yourself? I don't deal with the cause of the problem, nor do I take advice from it... I've bypassed the corrupt staffers and gone straight to the organ grinders here
@@nicotoscani1707 - I'm puzzled why you should think that I'm making any efforts at all to "convince" - I merely stated the facts.
Not a lot "organ grinders" can do about your claims in a comment on a video, claims require evidence.
If your waffle on the channel was anything like this, I'm not surprised you were kicked off - there are people making grand efforts at holding the agents of parliament assembled accountable, they are facing charges on their homes, attachments of earnings and here you are wanting to "express a thought".
Why is the money going off offshore then 😂 into citybank 🤷
The evidence of that would be grand.
The money they collect mostly goes to the government ‘consolidation fund’ and therefore your pothole repairs money went to Zelensky.
I get a total pension of less than £12000 per year, of that £3200 goes to council tax. What is left is to be spent on everything else to live. Poll tax was fairer to me but the other people thought it unfair that they should have to pay anything at all.
1:50 so I take it you are referring to the recent Richard Vobes and Mick interview, who claimed that some one at the court said no you’re not on the Calvin listing or criminal listings... oh it’s the council court!
3:58 so the magistrates cannot be hired privately, they have a job but could they be doing foreigners so to speak! So the council is adding unnecessary extra fees.
9:20 so when an employer upholds a AoEO from a council and asked to provide the evidence upon which they are acting and cannot, they too are liable for damages.
29:15 Demand. So can one rebut with something like ... To my knowledge there is no known law that grants one person to impose their will ie ‘demand’ on another. Please evidence your RIGHT to impose your will, your demands on myself or another person. Under what RIGHT are you acting? You cannot administrate property without RIGHT.
Can't be a coincidence that barristers carry out "devilling" during their training. Satan's little puppets. "Woe unto you lawyers..." Luke 11:52
The thing is you said its not important that they hire the court, I disagree because if they hire the court that creates work for a judge i presume who is paid too. So he is earning money from it, thus conflict of interest. Also the judge must not see any evidence as there is none
The courts are not hired by the council!
Most magistrates are lay justices and are NOT PAID!!! They are meant to be representative check and balance from the community!
@@marchorn466 - although most magistrates permit the Clerk of the Court/Legal Advisors to run the council tax sham, mainly heard in between complaints that actually have a case number and are registered on CourtServe, in a tea break. I'm sick of being summonsed to the court only to be told they don't have the time to hear me - that is a disrespect of my own time for which I need to be paid so I can amass the money I need to pay, pay, pay a murderous, criminal and corrupt parliament assembled so they can give themselves salary increases and spaff money on killing people in other countries while they invest their income in big pharma and giant tech.
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannelwhat 😱😢😵💫🤨 really?
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 Show me a few examples and I am sure we can find a rational explanation :)
I don't think these guys know what on earth they're talking about, they present no evidence for anything they claim plus they're as boring as hell!
BBB ? As for liability orders .Did he really know? I think not, nevertheless he is a nafarious character and in many cases delivering Parliment as a dictatorship
Challenge jurisdiction
Refer to Magistrates Court Act section 148 and suggest that the magistrates do their job to the oath they swore and the office under which they serve!
Your saying, you did not say, do not pay council tax! your process requiring them to prove obligation, obviously the people assume not to pay council tax until they prove the obligation as makes no sense to pay council tax without proof of obligation. However im checking all videos for the words 'do not pay council tax' to let you know
good luck with that one :)
Good luck with that claim of yours!
Another baseless claim.
It was to "withhold payment", to put the money aside and to take the process as far as you are comfortable. We have been very clear about this from the start.
Why are you even wasting your time here! 🙃
So when you turn up for your hearing and you are not on any court list, you are still attending a legitimate court? I don't think so.
The fake summons one to to communicate with the council, and not the court - What non-sense. Since when did the defendant have to deal with the claimant directly rather than the court?
When you go to the 'hired room kangaroo court' operated by the council, there is no rule of law or following of CPR's etc, restrictions on what you can and can't do, no legitimate court paperwork with official court seal (stamps) etc - All fraud.
Magistrates Court does not follow CPR, they have their own rules - look them up assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65578167d03a8d001207fb7a/magistrates-courts-rules-1981-jun-22.pdf
I believe you hear what you want to hear; there is no denial that the hearing you undergo, should you choose to attend, is an unlawful administrative hearing. Perhaps it is too difficult for you to comprehend that the sitting mags are merely upholding the will of parliament and wilfully bypassing both their sworn oath to serve the law as well as participating in a box ticking exercise.
Now turning to Dan for help lol
Good, it would be a delight not to see any more of your mindless and badly constructed comments. Go pester him rather - you and he deserve each other. It's a match made in heaven 😂
@@carolinecblackburn th-cam.com/video/hby0uzYYyQA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=umrAyEQ13MMqhZ8T
@@carolinecblackburn de=no
@@carolinecblackburn i dont do persons
th-cam.com/video/3Y2mXO-FMnM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=GdSf4bNaUHfgeNU-
so may be slightly on a different note, have not the councils converted peoples homes/dwelling/domicile into a commercial premises? Does this not have any bearing on whether they can tax peoples private home? Is this not unlawful conversion? Misrepresentation? Apart from the breach of duty you have just mentioned here, are there not multiple breaches of duty with regards to council tax? Do they also not breach the civil procedures prior to the Judge not fulfilling his oath? i am slightly lost on all this, to me from listening to many people there appears to be multiple levels of breaches, but will the one you cite here suffice? Or is that the only one really? yes i realise it is not easy, there is so much to learn.
The hereditament question has been answered by the supreme court and even they couldn't determine the definition but was a circular argument. The Magistrates are not bound to follow the CPR rules.
@@tcrookes2803 really? They are not bound to follow civil procedures? Please could you explain?
@@andrewdavies7827 please explain, and show the legislation you are using?
@@tcrookes2803 can you explain further please? Why are the magistrates not bound to follow the CPR rules?
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/12/section/1 Because they're not stated in this act and they have their own Magistrates courts rules @@maggiemccall7090
What authority has mark got none what so ever as lacks knowledge ask a judge
What authority does a treasonous King and Parliament have? Other than using force and intimidation via their police mafia.
Do you have some kind of authority to tell us we don't know what we are talking about?
In my understanding, you are trying to say in democracy, individual rights are the fundamental principle of the rule of law, and nobody can impose a will on an individual, so everything has to be voluntary or consented to. But if an individual receives social services from the government based on a principle governed by consent (voting representative), you find yourself to be subject to their rules because you have used their services, so is assumed you agree or are governmental services supposed to be free? Who can explain? Is capital gain tax also voluntary or are other demands for tax?
To anyone who has experienced loss through following PEACE KEEPERS who say WE WILL PAY once we have agreed to pay. If you took this stance and lost you have a claim against these two men to claim compensation for any losses incured including the price of property including your house if you lost it due to following what they are saying that was wrong and misleading
Why is it misleading?? Couldn't be more obvious what they telling you... are you a shill or just thick
Tell me, are there any other tried and tested methods to prevent paying council tax?
If anyone followed the NOCNOC process believing it was a free ride with a guarantee that you wouldn't have to pay, I suggest they were born yesterday.
"experienced loss through following Peace Keepers" - you're having a laugh, the only criminals here are the councils on behalf of parliament assembled - what did Marc and Brian get out of it? Ah, that would be nothing.
A bunch of self-indulgent, privileged cry-babies, unwilling to take responsibility for their own actions, suggesting that Peace Keepers were responsible while they exercised their own free will to withhold council tax.
I expect they also partook of the "safe and effective" so they could go on holiday and think that Trump will "lead" them to freedom.
Tell them from me that I'd be quite happy to wipe their arses for them if they pay me enough.
Why do you never answer questions from your viewers?
good question.. i think the reason is same as why newcomers get banned from their telegram group for .. not really a good reason at all .... other than not being in the inner circle... unless your name is 'x', you don't get a reply 😂
if it's a question about Birth certificates and strawman, then you won't get an answer and rightly so. That theory has never been proven but has shown to harm people.
They only get banned if they refuse to stop talking about strawman and making claims without evidence. They are seeking the truth and focusing on theories is a waste of everyone's time.@@nicotoscani1707
@@nicotoscani1707 - the rules of the channel are quite clear, as are the consequences when you choose, by your own free will, to ignore them. There are 1600 people on that channel, forgive us please if 2 people who earn not a penny from those members don't get to answer your question.
There is also a dispute process in place so, if you feel you were treated unfairly and banned unnecessarily, you are welcome to apply for resolution.
In the meantime, there are a plethora of other groups out there offering their assistance, I'm sure your questions have been adequately answered there - perhaps they too offer free training courses, that would be an added bonus wouldn't it!?
@@carolinecblackburn lol, this is the one that's banning people in there for nothing .. not following the 3 strike rules of their own channel
The liability order is created when the presiding judge pronounces it AND IT IS REGISTERED IN THE COURT REGISTER . Is what the rules state please correct me if wrong.
Not on paper.
@@ClairMarie74Thats correct, so they cannot prove it to you. And its a hired court,
@@hairyanglerfishno case number.
@@hairyanglerfishand probs a roaming judge
I am sure as many of you that Mark is not a judge or has been trained in Legal English therefore has no authority to be answering questions that only misslead the public who are going off what Mark says when he has no authority to answer such questions and does not know that a Person is a fictional entity, who claims a natural person exsits when a natural fiction can never excist you are being misslead
... and you need to learn to spell if you are going to start judging others on being trained in "Legal English".
@@carolinecblackburn written in plain english: i got ya using black magik, i dont comprehend what language your using i did not say which language i was using before now stop assuming and are you a judge? educate yourself with English language
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_English
@@publicnotice4169 🤡
@@carolinecblackburn try
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax
@@carolinecblackburn i dont do spells
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing
Daniel aka BBB, barristers and solicitors their first priority is to the courts and the system not to the defendant as far as I’m aware.
It's too the rule of law!
Barristers and Solicitors are officers of the court, so the court comes first and the client comes a good 2nd
This CT only gets a problem if your a home owner as you've got something they can target, even too the extreme compulsory purchase angle. Yes it's fraud because if you contact the court where a summons is alleged to be, they will write back saying the summons doesn't exist. If that's not fraud I don't know what is. If you have the dated council summons letter & the courts dated letter confirming no summons exists, how the hell do they get away with the obvious crime taking place. It just proves the whole system runs like the mafia does with the backing of the police too boot.
PS why would anyone turn up too a court case that's doesn't exist in law, if the council continue to impose their will on you after your informed them that the summons didn't exist before the court date, how can any further actions be legal ?
@stephenboyd4934 good point I'm bamboozled
GrahamHMoore of The English Constitution Party has the same problems with people refusing to understand his in depth study of English Common law. Every so often he has a full on rant because people refuse to listen to the facts. The straw man rubbish & refusing to give a name get people into an awful lot of trouble financially.
when are judges arrested? Excuse me why don;t you spell "Black Belt Barister", this will attrack views and show clarity in my humble oppinion
What is that you are saying? Coffee maker or Barrister?
BBB stands for 'Blackbelt Bar Bullshitter'
This is very drawn out as usual.
In summary you have a convoluted hook meaning you have to understand every legal nuance.
If the' person' issue is another hook why can't that be focused on.
Ie misapplying their acts.
Why are you wasting your time here 🙃
And these laws you mention mark were stated in the queens oath to be upheld…you guys haven’t done anything about acts, statutes etc being null and void from 1973…when the queen gave away her sovereignty and became head of state..when she sold us out to the E.u.and C.M…please do a vid on this…thanks ..
Why did the Queen enact the EEC in 1972 which allegedly made her not the queen? Head of State is the same as sovereign monarch. Who have you been listening to?
@@tcrookes2803 head of state is not the same as the monarch .. other wise the monarch word would be used…she was told we could not join the E.u .or C.M…it was withheld from the public..Foreign Commonwealth office FCO 30/1048 ( 1971 )…So..do you mean if you don’t know about it???…it doesn’t exist!!? How arrogant !!! ..It was M thatcher and E Heath..that was told by luxemberg priminister that it would be an act of treason against the British people to join U.K. with E.U and CM in 1968.. Heath and thatcher did not have the power or the monarch to take us out of the juridical system without a referendum…the monarch had to become a corporation to join the E.U…
The local gov act 1972.. part, 1, 2, and 3..this also put councils into corporations ,parliament, etc..they could not be bodies of men they had to detach from the judicial system…to join the E.U..or C.M..we have all been duped in many ways…the Queen was deposed of her sovereignty on 1 jan 1973..Heath and thatcher committed treason agains the crown and the people…which also makes Charles and Camilla no king or queen…all royalty from King Edward the 4 th..is totally fake because Edward the 4 was illegitimate..so non of our monarchy today should be where they are..
If one accepts the title as defendant and takes part in their legal proceedings in their legal court as the legal person then there’s joinder between the parties, now the show get on its way ,
So people must learn how to get out of their legal proceedings and out of that court also,
How is the dispute meant to be resolved if you don't confirm your name?
Council rep in court and swear evidence? - They don't attend the kangaroo court and your hearing is not on the court lists, as previously discussed.
It's trust law that's All it is 😂 The private courts are administrating your Trust .
All this err, ummm approach halting oration detracts from your message, you're not speaking confidently which doesn't inspire confidence in me. Why is it so damn difficult to get real, straightforward clarification on any of your videos, why not just cut to the chase and speak clearly, it just sounds like you're not really sure and are making it up as you go along.
The message is good but the delivery sucks big ones.
Who.
There has to be civil procedure rules, documents you must fill in, affidavits Etc, you can't get, bank accounts, passports, licence, without filling in generic documents, how can courts get business through without proper documentation.
i would like to see what physical state you were in after giving up your life to commit to researching this topic for 3+ years literally full time and also dealing with your own cases AND helping many other people, with their cases, FOR FREE, travelling the country AND keeping on top of the family business/matters AND create freely accessible RULES OF EQUITY COURSEWORK, for everyone ...? marc is tired so please before you make ignorant remarks, think or perhaps do something to help him?
Well the problem lies with you - if you are worried about form then you will not get the substance!!!
@greenlanes5140 - not all of us are trained or natural orators... and those who are have hardly proven trustworthy either.
To whom you give your confidence is your own personal choice, I would hope it would be a little more based on the substance than how it is delivered. Just a thought, leave it with you - use it/don't use it.
I'm convinced you're both gate keeper's.
You've kept everyone in a pen for 2 years.
Still no concrete results. BS other methods do work but you are steering people away from the simple method.
You probably don't even understand what we are doing! I recommend doing the FREE course on our website. This will show you exactly what we are doing.
Oh and you're more than welcome to meet me in person so you can decide on the gatekeeper nonsense!
Please provide judgements on other methods that have worked.
Until you gain knowledge i advise you both to stop misleading people as you refuse to accept you do not know what you do not know and refuse to have an open mind
Please list every instance of us misleading people.
Make sure your rebuttal includes the evidence. This means verifiable sources so we can check the evidence.
We do not rely upon conjectures.
We will be waiting for your non conjecture evidenced based rebuttals.
Tell me public notice, is there a public notice on what an irritation you are, if not there should be.
@@carolinecblackburn :For the Claim of the Knowledge is with the Correct-Senence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar by this Author.
th-cam.com/video/Hu1WRY_7ifA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HB32Oi0g7kCHHOU0
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
:For the Claim of the Knowledge is with the Correct-Senence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar by this Author.
th-cam.com/video/Hu1WRY_7ifA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HB32Oi0g7kCHHOU0
@@carolinecblackburn th-cam.com/video/hby0uzYYyQA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=umrAyEQ13MMqhZ8T
you guys are pathetic because you dont understand what is really happen and listening to some misguided guru who hasn't a clue; sad but very true.
What guru are you referring to so that I can avoid him like the plague?
@@tcrookes2803that will be Marc Bolan with Metal Guru 😂
says the person not only wasting his time watching the video but also showing his arrogance by attacking personalities as opposed to the substance... if that is the best you can do why are you here?
Looks like you've made a claim you will never be able to back up. Of course we are open to anything you believe we have wrong, but statements don't cut it so get your list of things together and let's start going through them shall we.
Oh and personal attacks show immature behaviour.
Danny Bamping why are you too scared to let people know it is you hiding behind that mask?