This guy wouldn’t be able to be a lawyer anymore if he didn’t push the governments narratives for them. He would be shut down and have a smear campaign against him. He’s not speaking out of turn in order to keep his role
Who is misleading us? You or him? Well known Respected Barrister...or Unknown wannabe lawyer & troll? Can you explain the differences btwn Statutory requirement Vs Contract requirement ? Breakdown it down for us...what are the statutory defences & the contractual defences applicable & can they be swapped around to suit u? Eg Statutory requirement can be defended using Contractual defence? I'm no expert but that's your starter for ten why u might not be correct Mr King
If it were law, it would be called a “law”. It’s a statute, or legislation, it’s not actually “law”. Sorry BBB, you’ve been invited by people to debate this point but seem to refuse. Perhaps because because you know you could not win the debate? 🤔
It's impossible to win debates with people who are unwilling to look facts in the face and believe that they have magic hats conferring immunity from the law. Far better to let them learn themselves by their receiving liability orders and those orders being enforced.
@@ziggarillo The Bill of Rights and other important documents say Statute and Law, identifying 2 different things. The Law is our Birth right not statute.
@@ziggarillo Is that the best reply you can come up with? Apparently, I know more English than you as I can read the Bill of Rights and understand that Law is our inalienable birthright, acts and statute are there for parliament only to govern the people based on "the people's laws and customs" Do some reading then you can come back with more than just names.
@@MichaelofEnglandou do realise the Bill of Rights is a statute right? I appreciate you know more made up by internet loons who think they have magic hats law than other people but it takes a special kind of mental gymnastics to claim legislation isn't law and then rely on the wording of a statute in support of that.
Legislation is not law it requires consent, “local authorities” have no authority unless given authority by a Man or Woman stupidly accepting they are a person (legalese) I have removed numerous clowns acting on all kinds of legislative law using common law from private property as there is no “lawful” obligation to pay tax. It is a civil matter as it causes no loss harm or injury to Man… A corporate entity cannot speak for crying out loud.
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 The stupidity is strong with this one. Common law is made by jurys, only another jury can amend common law. Parliament has enacted statutes that replicate common law so that they can get rid of jurys for non criminal claims in their sham courts.
Common-law is just a joke because it’s just an opinion of one man or woman who wishes to agree how to live and act with another man or woman at this time and place on earth. So if it’s just an opinion. How is another man or woman tricked in believing it has any force and affect on themselves. Now that’s the magicians trick [ remember all parliament; government codes acts; statutes; regulations; etc... ] to make a man or woman and property theirs to control and make them believe it’s true. But did the man or woman see how the trick was done ? . Remember a man or woman can never use another “intellectual property”( copyright ) as their property and as their words . So it must only be as cf: which means compare it with , and as an exhibit to ones claim ( not part of ones claim) So how is the trick performed upon man and woman ? and how dose man or woman stop their trick happening ( ceases and desist ). Have fun learning
I've noticed a direct correlation between the amount of council tax and the size and number of potholes! As the council tax goes up, so does the amount of potholes pro rata.⚠️😲😳 Surely the answer to reduce potholes is simply to reduce council tax substantially? 🤔😁
Legislation is LAW😂 fool, natural law is law legislation Is legal never the Twain shall meet, BBB cant debate the points raised, he just likes to use his private bar guild oath, he likes not to disclose or he will be exposed. Come on BBB debate
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 legislation is Not Law its statute, colour of law man made pseudo "statute" so called law. Are you BBB mate? Please do not continue the courts deception its dishonourable to mislead through lack of knowledge (to be kind,) there is no ignorance in the law another defacto colour of law statement. BBB and the judiciary cant debate the truth!
@D-Bunker correct its legislation Not Law. Capitis diminutio maxima or "capital letters" are dead man's text, (see graveyards,) relates to corporeal legal "fictional" persons, the .gov legalese call "citizens" ! Always place V.C prior to your autograph which is private "lawful," Or signature public "legal" V.C means "Under Duress!" Declares standing nullifies the courts claim over your mind, body and soul,. Stay on the private side of life only go into the "public side" of life as "Executor and Sole Beneficiary" of the legal person trust, corporeal juristic estate. As Executor and beneficiary you have limited liability and protect against the court gaining jurisdiction in any administration or salvage court. "Jurisdiction" is a con game by judges using the 3 cestui que vie undisclosed trusts, "commercial, salvage and eccalastical" used at varying times to trick you and joinder you the living man with the artificial legal person, beware the public servants will trick you to gain jurisdiction this is why 99% of all cases start in a magistrate a commercial/salvage court, which is NOT a court of record, its operating to the "private" bar guild corporation rules that BBB is a member! It's all a scam! I say always listen to people who have much vested experience which one has! The system is corrupt to the core and in total dishonour Love these debates can add a document next which will explain all, there are protectors of the system on here who attempt to discredit the truth , beware.
@D-Bunker thank you for agreeing to the servitude meaning of "Capitis Diminutio" you clearly agree with all other presumptions, you are aware the court works on presumptions such a big deception. The courts presume you are the trustee unless you rebuke the claim. You are the "trustee. As declaring the trustee executor and beneficiary positions in a defacto pseudo commercial private court who desperately need the defendant, "you", to gain your consent "status", thus gain JURISDICTION. If you do not rebuke and correct the error youcare NOT THE TRUSTEE, preferably declare your standing in your summons response and claim "Standing" asprimary true executor and sole beneficiary, then you are "presumed trustee" to allow the commercial magistrates court jurisdiction. The judge then takes the Executor "de son tort" role by operating deception and the prosecutor acts as beneficiary , the court clerk in the defacto administrative magistrates court if the judge cannot pass over the TRUSTEE status to you then he has been caught out and holds the liability for the commerce they are illegally and unlawfully acting to administrate the legal person estate, and meddle with the commercial accounting within the private operating bar guild as previously mentioned, which relates to the bond, the 1st cestui que vie trust to gain access to the legal person bond accounting, along with the jurisdictional rights over the living man through the private guild bar, a private for profit firm operating deception. This is why BBB as a member of the private bar guild is acting in dishonour and you need to be aware hes not acting or any barrister or solicitor, judge or clerk in your favour , it's a private hearing being administrated, by the Bar Guil, NOT a public hearing a commercial venue
As many Home Secretaries have stated we are a common law land and are governed by the consent of the people. Statutes need the consent of the governed to carry the full weight of the law. Common laws have to be obeyed no matter what.
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj just don’t follow them, if you aren’t causing loss harm or damage to a living man or woman then you haven’t committed a crime. Why are you upset and emotional about someone not paying a corporation? Are you that brainwashed and controlled that you get so enraged about someone not following the herd? That proves how controlled you are. It’s nothing more then programming the plebs on the bottom to do as they are told.
You have no idea. Stop telling people bullshit. The bill of rights 1688 states all laws, statutes and legislations require the consent of the governed. End of.
At least some of the clowns try and argue their position. "End of" 😂 I appreciate you haven't actually read the Bill of Rights and are just vomiting up what some joker with a TH-cam channel who claims to have a magic hat has told you it says.
But we shpuld not be paying this tax We never agreed to it. The only way we pay is through intimidation ' fines and jail . What rite do they have who gives them the rite ? Why do we have to pay this when foreign nationals 'mosques are excempt To tax people it should be with consent otherwise my opinion is its theft by intimidation
If council tax was "legal" then there would be no need for councils to draft there own liability orders , bypassing and impursnating the judiciary system. A corporation issuing a court verdict..........
This is just an opinion I do not know enough about it but more than likely this man would be struck off if he supported or confirmed these old Documents. I’ve never voted and I’ve never been on the electoral register so I do not give consent to be governed by the government surely this makes all statutes and legislations void in my circumstances? Well that’s my belief anyway
Well said, like any doctor that went against the media created COVID narrative and decided to speak out. If you speak out about the system, you lose your privilege in your field of work and are lambasted then shut down.
He works for the bar, he's not interested in Common law -what does blacklaws dictionary say about statutes, acts, and legislation even t may and the London mayor said we are governed by consent
@D-Bunker my point is that people who talk like revolutionaries probably still use the services they claim are provided under an illegal tax. Maybe they dont but short of fly tipping or burning rubbish, not sure how they can dispose of it.
That’s right, your council tax indirectly supports these organisations via banks and investments. But hey, pay what we demand or go to jail. No one can tell me this is right.
@@MrAndrewFarrow yes that’s the one! One of my favourites, that. The way he manipulates the the jury… oh and asking the judge for some butter to get the ring off!
Does the council tax apply to the legal fiction or the Living entity I recently found out my birth certificate declared me deceased and is a registered corporation trading four 160 million 520 thousand dollars as of the first September 2023. My understanding is this is fraud🙏
That is basically extortion. The council are a bricks and mortar for profit company, a corporation. There’s no agreement in place that anybody would pay them, they do not own the land we live on either, they have 0 powers to extract money.
nobody on the council tax is illegitimate argument ever says what they do with their household rubbish! Burn it? Fly tip? Have very smelly houses? I imagine its not beyond possible that after all the rhetoric, they still put them out🗑🚛
Got it, excellent. Next can we have a explanation of whether a birth certificate is a contract to give the child to the so called corporation of the united kingdom or whatever it is they call it? Much appreciated lawbro
I believe the confusion comes because all Gov entities and local authorities became Corporations somehere down the line. Can you explain to the people why this happened and was there a consultation with the electorate?
@@MrAndrewFarrow Sorry 'Company's' and who own's these Company's??? I heard that a certain police force was owned by the local authority because of the way they are settibg up all these so called 'companies' and this is why peiple are looking for proof if contract. If you set yourself up as a company then you are essentially contracting with people sending them a bill... So the way I see it people want to know the owners of the companys and are asking them tonprove their claim. The Gov set all this up and by not consukting with the people they are causing mass confusion. There ahoukd be a democratic orocess and people should have things explained to them in laymans terms not just rushed and pushed thro before anyone can blink an eye.
@@juliaw7533 they are NOT companies. Show me how you think a Local Authority or a regional police force is a company. They’re registered in D&B to buy things from overseas. Being registered at Companies House as a Company makes you a Company. Police forces aren’t owned by Local Authorities, although in some areas the regional mayor is the PCC too, but not in all areas.
@@juliaw7533 nonsense. How can you say they are set up on Companies House when they are not set up on Companies House? Go search it. Show me where Kirklees and Calderdale are set up on Companies House. They are set up as Local Authorities by Statute by Parliament and Royal Assent.
Legal rulings and acts of parliament are empowered by civil law for the cessation of harm. That is it. Legal rulings are not empowered to cause harm yet because people believe they are law these civil servants keep getting away with it
That's pretty much what the established 300+ years of the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty says, yes. Addition: Of course, it's not the government which passes laws, it's Parliament. So the government only gets its way on this if the proposed legislation commands sufficient support across MPs which may or may not be the case either within or outside the party in government.
Yes, but if you don’t like it you and all of your friends can vote for a different party at the next election that says it won’t charge you as much… isn’t democracy fun!
@@vanpallandt5799 it means that 650 members of parliament cannot tell 67 million people what to do. Do some reading on the 1688 bill of rights, 1688 coronation oath, and the 1700 act of Settlement. Just for starters.
@@craigtranter4848 Its a Parliamentary democracy. Otherwise how do you determine if should introduce the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for example? If the UK should support Ukraine. If all signage in Wales should be bilingual✝️🏴🇬🇧🇺🇦
Btw, do those ppl who, for example, claim that Council Tax is not payable/is an illegitimate charge, or whatever, not put out their bins on a Friday (or such other day). Are they the folk who fill the local park waste bins with plastic bags of household rubbish?(which also get emptied by the council)
@@MrAndrewFarrow When you're in receipt of public funding it has no value because it wasn't earned. There's always a demand for more as wants exceed needs. We can vote for change and we do, but the civil service and council workers remain in post. The only change will be this glacial replacement as these people retire early on their gold plated, index linked pensions.
@@juliaw7533 The biggest budget item for any council is adult social care. We've seen a huge wave of inward migration that has forced down wages and forced up the cost of accommodation. This then is causing homelessness and family break up, placing a huge burden on the adult social care budget and for a bonus it reduces the over all tax take. Result, taxes have to go up and\or services have to be cut!
Legal rulings and acts of parliament get the force of law when you consent to it. It is not law and never can be law. Yet we are never asked for consent therefore it's deception which is unlawful
Explain this?? Local governments contracts 1997 (1)Every statutory provision conferring or imposing a function on a local authority confers power on the local authority to enter into a contract with another person for the provision or making available of assets or services, or both, (whether or not together with goods) for the purposes of, or in connection with, the discharge of the function by the local authority.
It means that if the council wants to get the bins collected, it can enter into a contract with a third party to get the bins collected. Not sure where you are going with this tbh.
@@subsonix7150 No worries. It's just a catch all provision to ensure that councils are given a general legal authority to enter into contracts enabling them to actually fulfil their other duties.
Councils are corporations. They are on companies House with a company number. According to legislation a contract much be in place. Councils are responsible for liability. You need to read a bit more.. you are deliberately telling people lies! Just like you did when trying to explain what a starw man is... living men and women are not corporations. Corporation can only deal with a legal fictions ie done without informed consent, look it up. For a barrister you know very little or you are deliberately trying to con people. The Magna Carter of 1215 is still law today. Any changes made to it were done via legislation, legislation is not law. Look into constitutional law. Everything i have said is fact and you know it is. So enjoyed reading this do not take one bit of notice. I would urge you to look into constitutional law. The truth is there to be found
"[Councils] are on companies House with a company number." Go on then, give us an example of one being so registered at Companies House? What was that you were saying about deliberately telling lies? The rest was so incoherent it's difficult to comment on it other than to say it's deluded drivel.
Still waiting for an example of a local authority being registered as a company at Companies House. You can't find one can you? Because it isn't the case. Why did you choose to say something which is demonstrably false? Were you deliberately trying to mislead people about this or was this accidental based on not having a clue what you are talking about and you are just vomiting out Tiktok nonsense without actually bothering to check whether it's factual or not? I suppose we shouldn't expect much from someone who can't even spell "Magna Carta". But then you haven't actually read it have you? So, are you a fool or a liar? It's one or the other.
the same principle is applied when is about TV license it s in the same category, ONE more thing solicitors/barrister are there to defend the system not you
I think the confusion comes because the authorities and police only follow the laws that benefit them. If they followed the laws that they made i don't think there would be an issue. Everyone should be equal under the law. No one is above the law.
Law made by government should not exist. The claim that "Everyone should be equal under the law" is an oxymoron. Because what gives one person to create a law but I cannot?
@@SlowlyDecomposingSolicitor An oxymoron is a statement that contradicts itself. An example of this is "One man band". Why can't I make a law that means everyone else has to wear a blue suit on a Thursday, but the Government can make a law that allows my money to be stolen from me (through taxation)? The person who makes the laws is by definition more powerful than the people who follow the laws.
@@Dehydratedpencil No single person makes a law. They are collectively made by decision of Parliament. Parliament cannot be made to wear a blue suit on Thursdays because it's not a physical person but the members of it can be made to just as much as non-members.
Not one person has ever been successful with any of the 'Magna Carta' lines, or any of the other common Sovereign Citizen arguments. Not once. So many of these people seem to think they're going to quote some sort of magic phrase or that they've discovered some sort of unbeatable legal argument that gets them out of all sorts of responsibilities when they choose. Even IF the arguments were 100% correct, what practical difference does it make? No-one cares if you believe the law exists, it's still going to be enforced against you and there's nothing you can do about it. Argue all you want, the result will be the same.
Grow up, you are wrong I caught the courts with their pants down, people are found remedy to keep quiet, you are so wrong people do not expose the court deception, they do!
Exactly. Even if you don't pay that debt isn't going anywhere. It just builds up. So many liars on TH-cam saying they don't pay yet they have zero evidence to back up their claims.
I’m on benefits due to a disability ESA and PIP. I didn’t used to have to pay council tax as I had full benefits but last year they started taking away the council tax benefit and now I’m getting letters saying I need to pay it. It’s a reduced amount but still it was quite a shock.
Oka statue requirement a Pablo due which needs to be coming from the occupation. Who is living on these lands back then be used to live on the lands freely. But the only problem is the council tax. But then a mother and our father Use the pay referee neighbour, Adolf and signs and got your national insurance number and card and searching for work and stuff and do what is necessary or being on the benefits. And claiming certain beneficial benefits or working. Your a*** off to pay off that council tax fee. 7 people get it misunderstand about council tax. Or why's the police aint paying why they aint paying or if you look on the slip for everybody who has been injured to the council tax you're notifying at the fire brigade. The Use the pay referee neighbour, Adolf and signs and got your national insurance number and card and searching for work and stuff and do what is necessary or being on the benefits. And claiming certain beneficial benefits or working. Your a*** off to pay off that council tax fee. 7 people get it misunderstand about council tax. Or why's the police aint paying why they aint paying or if you look on the slip for everybody who has been injured to the council tax you're notifying at the fire brigade. The police Cancel Poo a pain council tax on a regular basis. So basically the people who have becomes mayor or becomes a situation inside I cancel hash who is running everything. That's how much taxes they have to pay out through their national wages, which is introducing to the but it's not just that the police has the payout, a certain tribute of their attacks for people who are benefi so working class is s*** Take a look at your council tax form. Look at the payments what they are paying the amount which is all separate, including hospital health care. It's all concluded inside the council tax. So if you avoid pain your cancer on a restricted note, you will be outcast as a un lawful citizen It's not a contract it will behave but 10 million is. It's when you signed up for your new house. What are your new mortgage school in to the house? Or anything like that you have to sign a decoration of independent signature which your council has to sign the paperwork to notify that they have, the right to proceed in the law matter which is at hand so when you go new house through a council or new house through a private, you will sign a piece of papers stating that you have to follow the rules in regulations of their council, tax paying bills and etcetera. Etcetera etcetera, if not, today, can a virtue at any particular kind of point without that signature a new refuse, decide it. Then they cannot commence you to move it into the house. Because you are legally going against the documentary of their documents. Meaning otherwise, if you want home, you got a sign. You supply away and you do that right beginning when you go in and apply for house. Won't she a sign up peace paper you have to follow those rules
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj can you show the obligation if is "clear". there is no file number at the civil courts. to demonstrate I may write you a order to pay me 2000 pound to keep you happy. on a piece of paper
So what you are saying is Legislation gives authority to councils to tax people? let's break that down. Some humans say its ok for some other humans to take money from some other humans. Bullshit. we are all equal under the law and nobody has authority over anyone else. Its about time we stand up to this.
Do not breach the peace. Cause no body any harm. Cause no body any loss. Do not use mischief or deception in your promises or contacts. These are common law. The actual law. The law of the land. Common law aka civil law. Civil taken from the Latin word Civilli. Which translates to the meeting place of the gods. So you could say the law recognises us as gods. So as long as you don't harm steel or decieve anyone you have supreme authority. Learn the difference between lawful and legal it will empower you
I'm not entirely convinced that there is quite so much "confusion". There are obviously a few people who've been sucked into the University of TikTok and fallen for the baseless guff spouted by FOTL types. I suspect though many more know they are talking absolute nonsense but as they would find it rather convenient if the FOTL guff were true, they pretend they think it is to justify the simple fact that they'd rather other people paid for things (and they just take the benefit).
This nonsense started a long time before Tik Tok. It started 10 to 12 years ago on Google+ These people were largely ignored until recently. That's where the problem lies
I used to know these types, and it took all my power to not burst into laughing whenever they'd spout their garbage. They even drive de-registered cars without insurance, then wonder why they get seized. Clowns.
Just require an expressed yes or no to these (2) two questions. Is tax: [council; income; etc...] voluntary yes or on. ? Is tax: [council; income; etc..] taken by force yes or no ? Just require a yes or no . But if a man or woman wishes to give their explanation go a head, but one still requires a expressed yes or no to the questions above and that’s it.
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj Which one of the yes or no is all i require Because obligation means: binding engaging or pledge; contract so not what is required for the yes or no questions. But thank you for ones civic lesson
Just a thought on 'acts of Parliament' and law... Wasn't there a law banning all e-scooters off our roads and pavements apart from the council provided ones of course? They're literally everywhere, nobody bats an eyelid, police cars just drive past them! 😲😳 Some other oddball 'laws' we must abide by- The beating of a rug or doormat is prohibited in metropolitan London in the daytime outside, unless you beat it before 8am! The carrying of a plank on a public footpath is forbidden, how on earth are scaffolders able to get their jobs done if it's illegal? The act of wearing a suit of armour in the houses of Parliament is totally illegal as is the bearing of arms! Driving your cattle through the streets is also highly illegal as is keeping pigs in your front garden! I could go on and on.....😲😳😁
@@SlowlyDecomposingSolicitor Apologies if my comment was too complicated for you to understand the point I was making. I'll try and simplify it for you - So I explained we have an abundance of utterly pointless laws and Acts of Parliament that everybody ignores and nobody bats an eyelid at breaking those laws. Such as the ones I highlighted like e-scooters, carrying a plank on a footpath, beating your rug in public, herding your cattle through the streets etc etc. There are many more, have you ever driven down a motorway at 70mph it's like you're standing still, everyone is hurtling along at +80mph. Try not paying your council tax for a few months and see what happens⚠️😳 Now compare that with riding a privately owned e-scooter to commute to work, still breaking the law but a completely different reaction from the authorities. If we're going to uphold the law re Council tax payments, surely we should uphold other laws similarly? Or don't you agree? Should we pick and choose which laws we want to follow and ignore the consequences?⚠️😳🤔
@pdtech4524 Yep, hundreds of e-scooters confiscated last year, no one actually herding cattle through the streets to be able to prosecute, no one beating rugs or more importantly bothering to report them even in the unlikely event any observer was aware of it being an offence, plenty of people getting fixed penalty notices for going over 70 on motorways, no one actually trying to wear suits of armour or bearing weapons in Parliament or actually keeping pigs on their front gardens. All great examples of laws being breached on a daily basis and that breach being ignored. Your point wasn't too complicated. The issue was that it was daft. I don't know how you think that examples of laws which are never actually breached or if breached are never reported so as to enable a prosecution, or which are breached and are regularly enforced, are examples of laws being regularly breached but that breach not being punished.
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 I never said that, of course we need laws to protect the public and give us order and structure to enable us to go about our daily lives, without being over restrictive or unduly oppressive! What I showed in my previous comment was a lack of balance and failure to uphold existing laws already in place! The e-scooter example I used shows this paradox clearly, so what are the figures currently for successful prosecutions compared to actual.numbers of e-scooters in regular use on our roads and footpaths illegally? I'll bet a very very small percentage, compared to the much higher numbers involved in failure to pay council tax.
@@MrAndrewFarrow And the way that is done is shady as hell, Summons produced and sent by the council, not the court, orders produced and sent by the council not the court, council add Costs (hugely inflated) BEFORE the case is heard, if the summons is not received then you have to go back to the council and not the court to have it set aside, liability orders granted BEFORE the case is heard, this is just a small list of why the whole process is shady
if a summons is issued and you don't attend court because you did not receive it then you have a legal right to have the order set aside, try that with the council tax matters, this really is the definition of shady, please tell me any other situation where you have to ask the plaintiff to have the matter set aside and not the court
@@MrAndrewFarrow The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 Application for a liability order "(2) The application is to be instituted by making a complaint to a justice of the peace and requesting the issuance of a summons directed to that person to appear before the court to show why he has not paid the sum which is outstanding." The actual reality is that the council produces the summons, using a copy of a justice of the peace's signature (you have no idea which one) and then hires the court for the day when the available magistrate rubber stamps all the cases pre "hearings". They then produce the liability orders themselves. There is case law stating that the magistrates should give careful consideration before "issuing a liability order", but this is rarely if not ever, done. Definition of shady
@@simonedwards1000 nonsense. The Council prints off the Liability Order, they are taken to the Magistrates’ Court in a bundle, the Magistrate agrees to them being sent out. Then they are sent out. They are thus FROM the Court. Don’t get into the “wet ink” silliness. It’s the same with parking fines. When I went, she had a bundle of about 500. She nearly fell over when they realised someone (me) had actually turned up. They took about 5 minutes to get mine out of the bundle, dealt with mine, then the Mag looked up and said “does anyone object to these Orders being granted?” No one else was there. He banged his gavel and said into open Court, “let these Orders be issued”. Then he turned to me and said ..”now, let’s look at yours….”
I pay all my 'council tax' 'Income tax' 'VA Tax' 'Vehicle Tax' 'food tax' no doubt soon, 'Window Tax' or 'Hearth Tax' so please will the 'local authority' please tell me why I have to fill out a 'form' to register to 'VOTE'? This legislation only provides the obligations of the department that has to compile the 'register' of voters.... so please leave me alone..
But all councils are corporate entities and businesses. Therefore you have to have a lawful contract to do business. Only corporations can do business with other companies, Your all caps name is a corporate entity. You are wrong and are talking nonsense. Do your research correctly.
So can you tell me, this, why is it there is no actual law to charge people or take them to court. Meaning each case gone to court was illegal and should have gone to court by law. Instead, when you owed the cancil tax after the end year of council tax then they can persue that, under final act. Like you said. If there is the law that says that, please share.
Please don't bite my head off I just asked the question. I am not disputing that we shouldn't pay council tax we should , but my concern is when you taken yo court bofer the end of cancil tax year. To be taken to court before then is surely illegal. That my point.
@D-Bunker-zv1bj no mate you are laying first of all when we went to court they were reminded they didn't have any right what do ever, being a magistrates court, secondly, they should not be allowed a case to start any case before the end of tax year, as it was un call for and unlawfully. Then they were asked this was done by the adviser to the judge by the way I was just a spectator. That, I was only 11 pound I will said it again 11 pound to finish my council tax having paid all the 1000 already and something. How can you apply 21 days for 11 pound then start legal process for not being in areas. Tell me that, in all fairness I thing you work for the council not bad, please don't abused power and come here to defend your Gastapo laws of 1560 and thing you can manipulate anyone's.
@D-Bunker-zv1bj clearly you are on cloud 9 with your contradiction. Now you change your tunes to why not pay 11 pound when is not the end of council tax year. Clearly every year the council release the new tax year with a different account of council tax not the same year. It seems all you saying it seems like you are part of the issue here maybe you were the ones with this abused of power of we were in court you will loose badly more likely you are the ones spend money and talk too much covering your backside. If I were to look at your tax return, council tax everything you are rotten to the core and have 3 mortgage.
Oh let me guess, a sovcit thought they had found "the best loophole ever" because they read some suuuuuuper out of date and no longer applicable rules? People these days
Oh, it's better than that. Quite a lot of their "rules" never existed in the first place....A throwaway obiter line on the supremacy of common law from a single judge, Edward Coke, in the C.17th and they hang onto it like it was the fount of all legal knowledge. Abandoned by pretty much everyone else within a couple of years, our FOTLer friends seem to think it was a longstanding centuries old principle which they are now resurrecting. Most of them haven't actually read the rules on which they rely (eg Magna Carta, Bill of Rights 1689, Bills of Exchange Act 1882) they've just hoovered up what some swivel eyed loon with a TikTok channel has told them what those documents say. And if they have read them, they sure as hell didn't understand them
@@Another-li2qn If what i've done was actually against the law and i was issued a fine for that infraction then yes, why wouldn't you? You disagreeing with the law doesn't change that it exists and that you are going to have to comply with them, so unless i didn't actually commit said infraction then yes i would have no actual valid reason not to pay it
@@shanematthews1985 So if parliament enacted "legislation" that said you have to give all your assets and money to the government tomorrow and every day thereafter. you would do it, would you? Because it's what the "rules" say? the "Law" apparently. And yet they tax you, fine you and bill you more and more year on year and somehow that's different? Why is it the government can demand an arbitrary amount from you and you have to pay it or they will bully you, take your property and cause harm? Does that actually sound right to you? Think about it. If I sent you a demand and called it a fine for "X" would you just pay it? Why not? Because I can't demand it. So why can they demand it? Because they made a law up that says you have to? I'm only asking that people think rationally about this, it's all warped!!!
You said yoirself it is a statutaory law, which means it has the same weight as common law if you consent to it, i.e. if you volunteer to accept it. Acts and Statutes fall outside the remit of common law. What do you say about that?
@Batters56 They're very reluctant to accept that if one were to take an empirical view as to what is and what is not, their 0% success rate might be a rather clear indication of the fact that whatever they believe, everyone who matters thinks rather differently.
And donvt complain about police. Don't call the fire brigade when their house is on fire.....schools.... Housing. Health and social care The list goes on.
@@latotheleaf2223 Immediately prior to CT it was the Community Charge, aka the Poll Tax, and prior to that it was through domestic rates based on the value of residential homes. All of those three are/were taxes created by statute, paid by the residents of the particular local authority to fund the services the LA provided.
@@latotheleaf2223 council services usued to be paid for by something called "Rates" Then, in the late 80s/early 90's Maggie Thatcher changed it to The Poll Tax, which was vehemently opposed by the population, with a massive demonstration in London, before it was changed to Council Tax. I was born in 1976 so if you have any more questions about the time before the internet I'm all ears.
@@latotheleaf2223 they also receive, and have always received, funding from Central Government (paid for by Taxes), Business Rates from businesses within their Unitary Authority, and other sources such as byelaws with financial penalties. All I hear from the FOTL types is "I want all the benefits with none of the responsibilities". Seems to be a very common message from the Marxists too. Now where did Marx get his funding to live his life? (Spoiler Alert: He was a freeloader) That's why i call FOTL types "Freeloaders Of The Land"
@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 I've often thought that the UK education system needs a civics course like they have in the US and the amount of drivel spouted on here proves the point. Juries striking out legislation? Now that is a new one...
While we're pontificating about the law I see the Tories have reinstated the witch finder general..they call it the single justice system..we all know it's so they can burn any witches when they decide who they are
A barrister defending his lucrative racket
This is why they ACT on your behalf
It always baffles me that people actually defend the government
This guy wouldn’t be able to be a lawyer anymore if he didn’t push the governments narratives for them. He would be shut down and have a smear campaign against him. He’s not speaking out of turn in order to keep his role
They are the people you voted for.
Don't believe him he is Missleading
you
He serves the Bar. I've spoken to people who said they don't pay under legal dispute. How well it works I don't know. They claim it works.
Who is misleading us?
You or him?
Well known Respected Barrister...or Unknown wannabe lawyer & troll?
Can you explain the differences btwn Statutory requirement Vs Contract requirement ?
Breakdown it down for us...what are the statutory defences & the contractual defences applicable & can they be swapped around to suit u?
Eg Statutory requirement can be defended using Contractual defence?
I'm no expert but that's your starter for ten why u might not be correct Mr King
If it were law, it would be called a “law”. It’s a statute, or legislation, it’s not actually “law”. Sorry BBB, you’ve been invited by people to debate this point but seem to refuse. Perhaps because because you know you could not win the debate? 🤔
Statute and legislation is law, is English your second language?
It's impossible to win debates with people who are unwilling to look facts in the face and believe that they have magic hats conferring immunity from the law. Far better to let them learn themselves by their receiving liability orders and those orders being enforced.
@@ziggarillo
The Bill of Rights and other important documents say Statute and Law, identifying 2 different things.
The Law is our Birth right not statute.
@@ziggarillo Is that the best reply you can come up with? Apparently, I know more English than you as I can read the Bill of Rights and understand that Law is our inalienable birthright, acts and statute are there for parliament only to govern the people based on "the people's laws and customs" Do some reading then you can come back with more than just names.
@@MichaelofEnglandou do realise the Bill of Rights is a statute right? I appreciate you know more made up by internet loons who think they have magic hats law than other people but it takes a special kind of mental gymnastics to claim legislation isn't law and then rely on the wording of a statute in support of that.
Legislation is not law it requires consent, “local authorities” have no authority unless given authority by a Man or Woman stupidly accepting they are a person (legalese)
I have removed numerous clowns acting on all kinds of legislative law using common law from private property as there is no “lawful” obligation to pay tax.
It is a civil matter as it causes no loss harm or injury to Man…
A corporate entity cannot speak for crying out loud.
Incorrect!
Legislation is primary law
Legislation can amend common law
Legislation doesn’t require your individual consent
"A corporate entity cannot speak for crying out loud."
I love the way you said that as if it had some relevance.
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 The stupidity is strong with this one. Common law is made by jurys, only another jury can amend common law. Parliament has enacted statutes that replicate common law so that they can get rid of jurys for non criminal claims in their sham courts.
@@MrHughk1Utter drivel and has no legal foundation
@D-Bunker because he's referring to contract, so where is the meeting of the minds ?
Black belt propaganda sausage
Common law means I don’t have to pay for anything I don’t feel like paying for. It’s in the Magna Carta. Probably.
Common-law is just a joke because it’s just an opinion of one man or woman who wishes to agree how to live and act with another man or woman at this time and place on earth.
So if it’s just an opinion. How is another man or woman tricked in believing it has any force and affect on themselves.
Now that’s the magicians trick [ remember all parliament; government codes acts; statutes; regulations; etc... ] to make a man or woman and property theirs to control and make them believe it’s true.
But did the man or woman see how the trick was done ? .
Remember a man or woman can never use another “intellectual property”( copyright ) as their property and as their words .
So it must only be as
cf: which means compare it with ,
and as an exhibit to ones claim ( not part of ones claim)
So how is the trick performed upon man and woman ?
and how dose man or woman stop their trick happening ( ceases and desist ).
Have fun learning
Lol...Is that the Magna Carta brewed by Pilsner?
"Probably...the best Magna Carta in the world?"
I've noticed a direct correlation between the amount of council tax and the size and number of potholes!
As the council tax goes up, so does the amount of potholes pro rata.⚠️😲😳
Surely the answer to reduce potholes is simply to reduce council tax substantially? 🤔😁
that's cos the ctax goes in fat councillors and mps bank accounts and the rest goes to ukraine 😂
Council tax funds wars and you can opt out on the basis of not funding terrorism
Legislation is LAW😂 fool, natural law is law legislation Is legal never the Twain shall meet, BBB cant debate the points raised, he just likes to use his private bar guild oath, he likes not to disclose or he will be exposed. Come on BBB debate
Correct legislation is law
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 legislation is Not Law its statute, colour of law man made pseudo "statute" so called law. Are you BBB mate? Please do not continue the courts deception its dishonourable to mislead through lack of knowledge (to be kind,) there is no ignorance in the law another defacto colour of law statement. BBB and the judiciary cant debate the truth!
Can't debate idiots.
@D-Bunker correct its legislation Not Law. Capitis diminutio maxima or "capital letters" are dead man's text, (see graveyards,) relates to corporeal legal "fictional" persons, the .gov legalese call "citizens" !
Always place V.C prior to your autograph which is private "lawful,"
Or
signature public "legal"
V.C means "Under Duress!" Declares standing nullifies the courts claim over your mind, body and soul,.
Stay on the private side of life only go into the "public side" of life as "Executor and Sole Beneficiary" of the legal person trust, corporeal juristic estate.
As Executor and beneficiary you have limited liability and protect against the court gaining jurisdiction in any administration or salvage court. "Jurisdiction" is a con game by judges using the 3 cestui que vie undisclosed trusts, "commercial, salvage and eccalastical" used at varying times to trick you and joinder you the living man with the artificial legal person, beware the public servants will trick you to gain jurisdiction this is why 99% of all cases start in a magistrate a commercial/salvage court, which is NOT a court of record, its operating to the "private" bar guild corporation rules that BBB is a member! It's all a scam! I say always listen to people who have much vested experience which one has! The system is corrupt to the core and in total dishonour
Love these debates can add a document next which will explain all, there are protectors of the system on here who attempt to discredit the truth , beware.
@D-Bunker thank you for agreeing to the servitude meaning of "Capitis Diminutio" you clearly agree with all other presumptions, you are aware the court works on presumptions such a big deception.
The courts presume you are the trustee unless you rebuke the claim. You are the "trustee.
As declaring the trustee executor and beneficiary positions in a defacto pseudo commercial private court who desperately need the defendant, "you", to gain your consent "status", thus gain JURISDICTION.
If you do not rebuke and correct the error youcare NOT THE TRUSTEE, preferably declare your standing in your summons response and claim "Standing" asprimary true executor and sole beneficiary, then you are "presumed trustee" to allow the commercial magistrates court jurisdiction.
The judge then takes the Executor "de son tort" role by operating deception and the prosecutor acts as beneficiary , the court clerk in the defacto administrative magistrates court if the judge cannot pass over the TRUSTEE status to you then he has been caught out and holds the liability for the commerce they are illegally and unlawfully acting to administrate the legal person estate, and meddle with the commercial accounting within the private operating bar guild as previously mentioned, which relates to the bond, the 1st cestui que vie trust to gain access to the legal person bond accounting, along with the jurisdictional rights over the living man through the private guild bar, a private for profit firm operating deception. This is why BBB as a member of the private bar guild is acting in dishonour and you need to be aware hes not acting or any barrister or solicitor, judge or clerk in your favour , it's a private hearing being administrated, by the Bar Guil, NOT a public hearing a commercial venue
As many Home Secretaries have stated we are a common law land and are governed by the consent of the people. Statutes need the consent of the governed to carry the full weight of the law. Common laws have to be obeyed no matter what.
@@D-Bunker-zv1bjno law made by man stands above man
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj just don’t follow them, if you aren’t causing loss harm or damage to a living man or woman then you haven’t committed a crime. Why are you upset and emotional about someone not paying a corporation? Are you that brainwashed and controlled that you get so enraged about someone not following the herd? That proves how controlled you are. It’s nothing more then programming the plebs on the bottom to do as they are told.
Wouldn't it be great if everyone decided to just be homeless at same time 😂😂
What a stupid idea
You have no idea. Stop telling people bullshit. The bill of rights 1688 states all laws, statutes and legislations require the consent of the governed. End of.
🤣
At least some of the clowns try and argue their position.
"End of" 😂
I appreciate you haven't actually read the Bill of Rights and are just vomiting up what some joker with a TH-cam channel who claims to have a magic hat has told you it says.
Someone doesn’t understand what they have read!
Your individual consent isn’t required
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 Bit harsh to say he doesn't understand what he has read. He hasn't read it at all.
@@SlowlyDecomposingSolicitor He doesn’t appear to have read any of it, just believes what he saw on twitter
But we shpuld not be paying this tax We never agreed to it. The only way we pay is through intimidation ' fines and jail . What rite do they have who gives them the rite ? Why do we have to pay this when foreign nationals 'mosques are excempt To tax people it should be with consent otherwise my opinion is its theft by intimidation
Your agreement isn’t required
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 yes it is
@@terenceoakes4244 law is clear, it’s not
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 the law is an ass
@@terenceoakes4244 sounds like the only ass here is the bloke he can just say no to a law he doesn’t like
If council tax was "legal" then there would be no need for councils to draft there own liability orders , bypassing and impursnating the judiciary system. A corporation issuing a court verdict..........
Fake liability orders, magistrates courts have been illegal since the 1990s
@@D-Bunker-zv1bjdebunk what he’s said then, we will wait.
This is just an opinion I do not know enough about it but more than likely this man would be struck off if he supported or confirmed these old Documents.
I’ve never voted and I’ve never been on the electoral register so I do not give consent to be governed by the government surely this makes all statutes and legislations void in my circumstances? Well that’s my belief anyway
Your individual consent isnt required
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 well it's a good job I behave myself then isn't it
Well said, like any doctor that went against the media created COVID narrative and decided to speak out. If you speak out about the system, you lose your privilege in your field of work and are lambasted then shut down.
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843go and get your booster lad
😂 council is a corporation and all corporations must abide by contract-law
He works for the bar, he's not interested in Common law -what does blacklaws dictionary say about statutes, acts, and legislation even t may and the London mayor said we are governed by consent
a corrupted barrister
How about if the council are spending money supporting organisations that condone terrorism or others that are grooming children.
Evidence the claim
By "grooming" you mean teachers are teaching sex education?
You gonna hold a nazi style book burning next? This isn't Florida thank God.
Dont put your bins out
@D-Bunker my point is that people who talk like revolutionaries probably still use the services they claim are provided under an illegal tax. Maybe they dont but short of fly tipping or burning rubbish, not sure how they can dispose of it.
That’s right, your council tax indirectly supports these organisations via banks and investments. But hey, pay what we demand or go to jail. No one can tell me this is right.
Magna Carta is not a brand of cider though some may be wearing cider goggles in their understanding of council tax.
What about Magna Carta?
Did she die in vain?
Which Hancock’s Half Hour do I remember this from!?
@@thenargles The blood donor. Definitely. They are bleeding us dry!
@@thenargles 12 angry men, when the lad was foreman of the jury.
@@MrAndrewFarrow yes that’s the one! One of my favourites, that. The way he manipulates the the jury… oh and asking the judge for some butter to get the ring off!
@@thenargles …like what, any more they don’t make ‘em!
Does the council tax apply to the legal fiction or the Living entity I recently found out my birth certificate declared me deceased and is a registered corporation trading four 160 million 520 thousand dollars as of the first September 2023. My understanding is this is fraud🙏
How did you find this out hun, or where did you find it. Thanks x
That is basically extortion. The council are a bricks and mortar for profit company, a corporation. There’s no agreement in place that anybody would pay them, they do not own the land we live on either, they have 0 powers to extract money.
nobody on the council tax is illegitimate argument ever says what they do with their household rubbish! Burn it? Fly tip? Have very smelly houses? I imagine its not beyond possible that after all the rhetoric, they still put them out🗑🚛
Council tax pays for the made up national debt your bins are paid for using credit so its paid.
Got it, excellent. Next can we have a explanation of whether a birth certificate is a contract to give the child to the so called corporation of the united kingdom or whatever it is they call it? Much appreciated lawbro
I believe the confusion comes because all Gov entities and local authorities became Corporations somehere down the line. Can you explain to the people why this happened and was there a consultation with the electorate?
They’re not corporations.
They’re listed in Dun & Bradstreet.
@@MrAndrewFarrow Sorry 'Company's' and who own's these Company's??? I heard that a certain police force was owned by the local authority because of the way they are settibg up all these so called 'companies' and this is why peiple are looking for proof if contract. If you set yourself up as a company then you are essentially contracting with people sending them a bill... So the way I see it people want to know the owners of the companys and are asking them tonprove their claim. The Gov set all this up and by not consukting with the people they are causing mass confusion. There ahoukd be a democratic orocess and people should have things explained to them in laymans terms not just rushed and pushed thro before anyone can blink an eye.
@@juliaw7533 they are NOT companies.
Show me how you think a Local Authority or a regional police force is a company.
They’re registered in D&B to buy things from overseas.
Being registered at Companies House as a Company makes you a Company.
Police forces aren’t owned by Local Authorities, although in some areas the regional mayor is the PCC too, but not in all areas.
@@MrAndrewFarrow They are non limited companies registered on C9mpanies House and Body Corporates, according to Section 2(3) Local Gov Act 1972
@@juliaw7533 nonsense.
How can you say they are set up on Companies House when they are not set up on Companies House?
Go search it.
Show me where Kirklees and Calderdale are set up on Companies House.
They are set up as Local Authorities by Statute by Parliament and Royal Assent.
Legal rulings and acts of parliament are empowered by civil law for the cessation of harm. That is it. Legal rulings are not empowered to cause harm yet because people believe they are law these civil servants keep getting away with it
So does this mean the Government can just pass a instrument to make you pay whatever they want?
That's pretty much what the established 300+ years of the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty says, yes.
Addition:
Of course, it's not the government which passes laws, it's Parliament. So the government only gets its way on this if the proposed legislation commands sufficient support across MPs which may or may not be the case either within or outside the party in government.
Pretty much. Now get a book on anarchy and we can look at moving past this system of robbery
It's the same as the Germans not doing anything illegal in the 30s...government is no good
Yes, but if you don’t like it you and all of your friends can vote for a different party at the next election that says it won’t charge you as much… isn’t democracy fun!
@@Another-li2qn already an anarcho-capitalist mate 😉
No man can make an obligation for another man.
But they can make laws through Legislation 😂
what does that mean?
@@vanpallandt5799 it means that 650 members of parliament cannot tell 67 million people what to do. Do some reading on the 1688 bill of rights, 1688 coronation oath, and the 1700 act of Settlement. Just for starters.
@@craigtranter4848 Its a Parliamentary democracy. Otherwise how do you determine if should introduce the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for example? If the UK should support Ukraine. If all signage in Wales should be bilingual✝️🏴🇬🇧🇺🇦
Btw, do those ppl who, for example, claim that Council Tax is not payable/is an illegitimate charge, or whatever, not put out their bins on a Friday (or such other day). Are they the folk who fill the local park waste bins with plastic bags of household rubbish?(which also get emptied by the council)
Over the last 40yrs council tax has gone up x5, while salaries have gone up x2.
…vote for change then…
@@MrAndrewFarrow When you're in receipt of public funding it has no value because it wasn't earned.
There's always a demand for more as wants exceed needs.
We can vote for change and we do, but the civil service and council workers remain in post. The only change will be this glacial replacement as these people retire early on their gold plated, index linked pensions.
@@davehudl3593 …and the roads, hospitals, schools etc.
And Services have gone down x 10
@@juliaw7533 The biggest budget item for any council is adult social care. We've seen a huge wave of inward migration that has forced down wages and forced up the cost of accommodation. This then is causing homelessness and family break up, placing a huge burden on the adult social care budget and for a bonus it reduces the over all tax take. Result, taxes have to go up and\or services have to be cut!
Legal rulings and acts of parliament get the force of law when you consent to it. It is not law and never can be law. Yet we are never asked for consent therefore it's deception which is unlawful
His idiot pay roll working system together we humans a free
Some one telling some one else what to pay when to pay it is bullying. It has to be agreement if money is involved .....
If you don't pay for it, what happens? because they can't get a liability order , not a legal one anyway signed by the JP
This guys as fraudulent as council tax
As rental tenant, council tax liability is usually written into the tenancy agreement, or at least all of my agreements have stated this ?
Yep and when someone owns the house, it's part of their deeds.
Explain this?? Local governments contracts 1997
(1)Every statutory provision conferring or imposing a function on a local authority confers power on the local authority to enter into a contract with another person for the provision or making available of assets or services, or both, (whether or not together with goods) for the purposes of, or in connection with, the discharge of the function by the local authority.
It means that if the council wants to get the bins collected, it can enter into a contract with a third party to get the bins collected. Not sure where you are going with this tbh.
@@SlowlyDecomposingSolicitor ah OK,must of misunderstood it. Thanks for clearing that up
@@subsonix7150 No worries. It's just a catch all provision to ensure that councils are given a general legal authority to enter into contracts enabling them to actually fulfil their other duties.
Is it like a get out jail free card ???
@@kingdavid3533are you asking if the legal right to contract with a third party to take away the rubbish of the residents a get out of jail free card?
Councils are corporations. They are on companies House with a company number. According to legislation a contract much be in place. Councils are responsible for liability. You need to read a bit more.. you are deliberately telling people lies! Just like you did when trying to explain what a starw man is... living men and women are not corporations. Corporation can only deal with a legal fictions ie done without informed consent, look it up. For a barrister you know very little or you are deliberately trying to con people.
The Magna Carter of 1215 is still law today. Any changes made to it were done via legislation, legislation is not law. Look into constitutional law. Everything i have said is fact and you know it is.
So enjoyed reading this do not take one bit of notice. I would urge you to look into constitutional law. The truth is there to be found
Magna Carta is mostly repealed
"[Councils] are on companies House with a company number."
Go on then, give us an example of one being so registered at Companies House?
What was that you were saying about deliberately telling lies?
The rest was so incoherent it's difficult to comment on it other than to say it's deluded drivel.
Well, give us an example then.....
Still waiting for an example of a local authority being registered as a company at Companies House.
You can't find one can you? Because it isn't the case.
Why did you choose to say something which is demonstrably false? Were you deliberately trying to mislead people about this or was this accidental based on not having a clue what you are talking about and you are just vomiting out Tiktok nonsense without actually bothering to check whether it's factual or not?
I suppose we shouldn't expect much from someone who can't even spell "Magna Carta". But then you haven't actually read it have you?
So, are you a fool or a liar? It's one or the other.
"Magner Carter" is it?
the same principle is applied when is about TV license it s in the same category, ONE more thing solicitors/barrister are there to defend the system not you
I think the confusion comes because the authorities and police only follow the laws that benefit them. If they followed the laws that they made i don't think there would be an issue. Everyone should be equal under the law. No one is above the law.
Law made by government should not exist. The claim that "Everyone should be equal under the law" is an oxymoron. Because what gives one person to create a law but I cannot?
@@DehydratedpencilWell you've demonstrated that you don't know what oxymoron means. But nothing else.
@@SlowlyDecomposingSolicitor An oxymoron is a statement that contradicts itself. An example of this is "One man band".
Why can't I make a law that means everyone else has to wear a blue suit on a Thursday, but the Government can make a law that allows my money to be stolen from me (through taxation)?
The person who makes the laws is by definition more powerful than the people who follow the laws.
@@Dehydratedpencil No single person makes a law. They are collectively made by decision of Parliament. Parliament cannot be made to wear a blue suit on Thursdays because it's not a physical person but the members of it can be made to just as much as non-members.
@Dehydratedpencil never thought of it that way. If they make the law then they would be above it.
Not one person has ever been successful with any of the 'Magna Carta' lines, or any of the other common Sovereign Citizen arguments. Not once.
So many of these people seem to think they're going to quote some sort of magic phrase or that they've discovered some sort of unbeatable legal argument that gets them out of all sorts of responsibilities when they choose.
Even IF the arguments were 100% correct, what practical difference does it make?
No-one cares if you believe the law exists, it's still going to be enforced against you and there's nothing you can do about it. Argue all you want, the result will be the same.
Little me syndrome, stay asleep
Grow up, you are wrong I caught the courts with their pants down, people are found remedy to keep quiet, you are so wrong people do not expose the court deception, they do!
Exactly. Even if you don't pay that debt isn't going anywhere. It just builds up.
So many liars on TH-cam saying they don't pay yet they have zero evidence to back up their claims.
It is not law. It is statute. Where dies it state in statute that residential properties should pay?
An act? Made by actors.
You’re on the bong early today.
@annoyingbstard9407 don't worry, there's plenty to go round.
he just laying. if you want to know read truth then contact the common law court.
I’m on benefits due to a disability ESA and PIP. I didn’t used to have to pay council tax as I had full benefits but last year they started taking away the council tax benefit and now I’m getting letters saying I need to pay it. It’s a reduced amount but still it was quite a shock.
It’s only 20%.
It’s covered in your benefit.
It’s so that you you have one stake in how the Council spends our money.
Seems right to me.
This country is broken and nobody should pay them anything
Why were you getting council tax benefits if you didn’t need to pay it?
dont pay nothing will happen,
You are wrong about this. Dont listen to his lies in tbis subject do your own research. Plenty of people are doing it
This guy knows nothing
Oka statue requirement a Pablo due which needs to be coming from the occupation. Who is living on these lands back then be used to live on the lands freely. But the only problem is the council tax. But then a mother and our father Use the pay referee neighbour, Adolf and signs and got your national insurance number and card and searching for work and stuff and do what is necessary or being on the benefits. And claiming certain beneficial benefits or working. Your a*** off to pay off that council tax fee. 7 people get it misunderstand about council tax. Or why's the police aint paying why they aint paying or if you look on the slip for everybody who has been injured to the council tax you're notifying at the fire brigade.
The Use the pay referee neighbour, Adolf and signs and got your national insurance number and card and searching for work and stuff and do what is necessary or being on the benefits. And claiming certain beneficial benefits or working. Your a*** off to pay off that council tax fee. 7 people get it misunderstand about council tax. Or why's the police aint paying why they aint paying or if you look on the slip for everybody who has been injured to the council tax you're notifying at the fire brigade.
The police
Cancel Poo a pain council tax on a regular basis. So basically the people who have becomes mayor or becomes a situation inside I cancel hash who is running everything. That's how much taxes they have to pay out through their national wages, which is introducing to the but it's not just that the police has the payout, a certain tribute of their attacks for people who are benefi so working class is s*** Take a look at your council tax form. Look at the payments what they are paying the amount which is all separate, including hospital health care. It's all concluded inside the council tax. So if you avoid pain your cancer on a restricted note, you will be outcast as a un lawful citizen
It's not a contract it will behave but 10 million is. It's when you signed up for your new house. What are your new mortgage school in to the house? Or anything like that you have to sign a decoration of independent signature which your council has to sign the paperwork to notify that they have, the right to proceed in the law matter which is at hand so when you go new house through a council or new house through a private, you will sign a piece of papers stating that you have to follow the rules in regulations of their council, tax paying bills and etcetera. Etcetera etcetera, if not, today, can a virtue at any particular kind of point without that signature a new refuse, decide it. Then they cannot commence you to move it into the house. Because you are legally going against the documentary of their documents. Meaning otherwise, if you want home, you got a sign. You supply away and you do that right beginning when you go in and apply for house. Won't she a sign up peace paper you have to follow those rules
there is a discretionary payment . available, but you don't mention this.? show the obligation. where is the case number în court?
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj so there is no case without a court without a judge it is extortion fraud etc
@@omviuvenitlalumina Let's imagine for a moment you're correct.
What are you going to do about it?
@@OhWhatsThisThen there are tutorials if you are really interested...
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj can you show the obligation if is "clear". there is no file number at the civil courts. to demonstrate I may write you a order to pay me 2000 pound to keep you happy. on a piece of paper
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj I'm not a person. I'm a man of fleash and blood . unlike you who is a person. I'm not a name either, unlike you.
Pompous Nonsense !!!
😂😂😂
So what you are saying is Legislation gives authority to councils to tax people? let's break that down. Some humans say its ok for some other humans to take money from some other humans. Bullshit. we are all equal under the law and nobody has authority over anyone else. Its about time we stand up to this.
Do not breach the peace. Cause no body any harm. Cause no body any loss. Do not use mischief or deception in your promises or contacts. These are common law. The actual law. The law of the land. Common law aka civil law. Civil taken from the Latin word Civilli. Which translates to the meeting place of the gods. So you could say the law recognises us as gods. So as long as you don't harm steel or decieve anyone you have supreme authority. Learn the difference between lawful and legal it will empower you
I'm not entirely convinced that there is quite so much "confusion". There are obviously a few people who've been sucked into the University of TikTok and fallen for the baseless guff spouted by FOTL types. I suspect though many more know they are talking absolute nonsense but as they would find it rather convenient if the FOTL guff were true, they pretend they think it is to justify the simple fact that they'd rather other people paid for things (and they just take the benefit).
This nonsense started a long time before Tik Tok. It started 10 to 12 years ago on Google+
These people were largely ignored until recently. That's where the problem lies
I used to know these types, and it took all my power to not burst into laughing whenever they'd spout their garbage. They even drive de-registered cars without insurance, then wonder why they get seized. Clowns.
Just require an expressed yes or no to these (2) two questions.
Is tax: [council; income; etc...] voluntary yes or on. ?
Is tax: [council; income; etc..] taken by force yes or no ?
Just require a yes or no .
But if a man or woman wishes to give their explanation go a head,
but one still requires a expressed yes or no to the questions above and that’s it.
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj
Which one of the yes or no is all i require
Because obligation means: binding engaging or pledge; contract so not what is required for the yes or no questions.
But thank you for ones civic lesson
@@D-Bunker-zv1bj it’s yes or no which one to which question.
so it’s either yes or it’s either no .
Just a thought on 'acts of Parliament' and law...
Wasn't there a law banning all e-scooters off our roads and pavements apart from the council provided ones of course?
They're literally everywhere, nobody bats an eyelid, police cars just drive past them! 😲😳
Some other oddball 'laws' we must abide by-
The beating of a rug or doormat is prohibited in metropolitan London in the daytime outside, unless you beat it before 8am!
The carrying of a plank on a public footpath is forbidden, how on earth are scaffolders able to get their jobs done if it's illegal?
The act of wearing a suit of armour in the houses of Parliament is totally illegal as is the bearing of arms!
Driving your cattle through the streets is also highly illegal as is keeping pigs in your front garden!
I could go on and on.....😲😳😁
You could and still no one would know what the actual point you were trying to make was.
@@SlowlyDecomposingSolicitor Apologies if my comment was too complicated for you to understand the point I was making.
I'll try and simplify it for you -
So I explained we have an abundance of utterly pointless laws and Acts of Parliament that everybody ignores and nobody bats an eyelid at breaking those laws.
Such as the ones I highlighted like e-scooters, carrying a plank on a footpath, beating your rug in public, herding your cattle through the streets etc etc.
There are many more, have you ever driven down a motorway at 70mph it's like you're standing still, everyone is hurtling along at +80mph.
Try not paying your council tax for a few months and see what happens⚠️😳
Now compare that with riding a privately owned e-scooter to commute to work, still breaking the law but a completely different reaction from the authorities.
If we're going to uphold the law re Council tax payments, surely we should uphold other laws similarly?
Or don't you agree?
Should we pick and choose which laws we want to follow and ignore the consequences?⚠️😳🤔
@pdtech4524 Yep, hundreds of e-scooters confiscated last year, no one actually herding cattle through the streets to be able to prosecute, no one beating rugs or more importantly bothering to report them even in the unlikely event any observer was aware of it being an offence, plenty of people getting fixed penalty notices for going over 70 on motorways, no one actually trying to wear suits of armour or bearing weapons in Parliament or actually keeping pigs on their front gardens. All great examples of laws being breached on a daily basis and that breach being ignored. Your point wasn't too complicated. The issue was that it was daft.
I don't know how you think that examples of laws which are never actually breached or if breached are never reported so as to enable a prosecution, or which are breached and are regularly enforced, are examples of laws being regularly breached but that breach not being punished.
@@pdtech4524In your unqualified and poorly informed opinion these laws are not needed
@@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 I never said that, of course we need laws to protect the public and give us order and structure to enable us to go about our daily lives, without being over restrictive or unduly oppressive!
What I showed in my previous comment was a lack of balance and failure to uphold existing laws already in place!
The e-scooter example I used shows this paradox clearly, so what are the figures currently for successful prosecutions compared to actual.numbers of e-scooters in regular use on our roads and footpaths illegally?
I'll bet a very very small percentage, compared to the much higher numbers involved in failure to pay council tax.
This is all true but as a barrister you argue points of law and the law surrounding Council tax summons and liabilities orders is shady as hell.
No, it’s not.
If you don’t pay, the Council takes out a Liability Order against you.
@@MrAndrewFarrow And the way that is done is shady as hell, Summons produced and sent by the council, not the court, orders produced and sent by the council not the court, council add Costs (hugely inflated) BEFORE the case is heard, if the summons is not received then you have to go back to the council and not the court to have it set aside, liability orders granted BEFORE the case is heard, this is just a small list of why the whole process is shady
if a summons is issued and you don't attend court because you did not receive it then you have a legal right to have the order set aside, try that with the council tax matters, this really is the definition of shady, please tell me any other situation where you have to ask the plaintiff to have the matter set aside and not the court
@@MrAndrewFarrow The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992
Application for a liability order
"(2) The application is to be instituted by making a complaint to a justice of the peace and requesting the issuance of a summons directed to that person to appear before the court to show why he has not paid the sum which is outstanding."
The actual reality is that the council produces the summons, using a copy of a justice of the peace's signature (you have no idea which one) and then hires the court for the day when the available magistrate rubber stamps all the cases pre "hearings".
They then produce the liability orders themselves.
There is case law stating that the magistrates should give careful consideration before "issuing a liability order", but this is rarely if not ever, done.
Definition of shady
@@simonedwards1000 nonsense.
The Council prints off the Liability Order, they are taken to the Magistrates’ Court in a bundle, the Magistrate agrees to them being sent out. Then they are sent out.
They are thus FROM the Court.
Don’t get into the “wet ink” silliness.
It’s the same with parking fines.
When I went, she had a bundle of about 500. She nearly fell over when they realised someone (me) had actually turned up.
They took about 5 minutes to get mine out of the bundle, dealt with mine, then the Mag looked up and said “does anyone object to these Orders being granted?” No one else was there. He banged his gavel and said into open Court, “let these Orders be issued”.
Then he turned to me and said ..”now, let’s look at yours….”
acts and statues are not law
Yes they are.
a financial act ? does an act not need to be constented to for example the covid act
Not quite true, at the bottom of the hierarcy is the non resident owner, above are the five categories that each require residency
I pay all my 'council tax' 'Income tax' 'VA Tax' 'Vehicle Tax' 'food tax' no doubt soon, 'Window Tax' or 'Hearth Tax' so please will the 'local authority' please tell me why I have to fill out a 'form' to register to 'VOTE'? This legislation only provides the obligations of the department that has to compile the 'register' of voters.... so please leave me alone..
But all councils are corporate entities and businesses. Therefore you have to have a lawful contract to do business. Only corporations can do business with other companies, Your all caps name is a corporate entity. You are wrong and are talking nonsense. Do your research correctly.
Wouldn’t it be interesting if we just stopped using the pound as currency. Use our own currency eg LETS
No, let’s not.
I am finding it all so confusing
So can you tell me, this, why is it there is no actual law to charge people or take them to court.
Meaning each case gone to court was illegal and should have gone to court by law.
Instead, when you owed the cancil tax after the end year of council tax then they can persue that, under final act. Like you said. If there is the law that says that, please share.
Please don't bite my head off I just asked the question. I am not disputing that we shouldn't pay council tax we should , but my concern is when you taken yo court bofer the end of cancil tax year.
To be taken to court before then is surely illegal. That my point.
@D-Bunker-zv1bj being that, what about,authority corruption and abused of power, letigation, cover up and fabrication of information.
@D-Bunker-zv1bj no mate you are laying first of all when we went to court they were reminded they didn't have any right what do ever, being a magistrates court, secondly, they should not be allowed a case to start any case before the end of tax year, as it was un call for and unlawfully.
Then they were asked this was done by the adviser to the judge by the way I was just a spectator. That, I was only 11 pound I will said it again 11 pound to finish my council tax having paid all the 1000 already and something.
How can you apply 21 days for 11 pound then start legal process for not being in areas. Tell me that, in all fairness I thing you work for the council not bad, please don't abused power and come here to defend your Gastapo laws of 1560 and thing you can manipulate anyone's.
@D-Bunker-zv1bj clearly you are on cloud 9 with your contradiction. Now you change your tunes to why not pay 11 pound when is not the end of council tax year. Clearly every year the council release the new tax year with a different account of council tax not the same year. It seems all you saying it seems like you are part of the issue here maybe you were the ones with this abused of power of we were in court you will loose badly more likely you are the ones spend money and talk too much covering your backside. If I were to look at your tax return, council tax everything you are rotten to the core and have 3 mortgage.
Oh let me guess, a sovcit thought they had found "the best loophole ever" because they read some suuuuuuper out of date and no longer applicable rules?
People these days
Oh, it's better than that. Quite a lot of their "rules" never existed in the first place....A throwaway obiter line on the supremacy of common law from a single judge, Edward Coke, in the C.17th and they hang onto it like it was the fount of all legal knowledge. Abandoned by pretty much everyone else within a couple of years, our FOTLer friends seem to think it was a longstanding centuries old principle which they are now resurrecting. Most of them haven't actually read the rules on which they rely (eg Magna Carta, Bill of Rights 1689, Bills of Exchange Act 1882) they've just hoovered up what some swivel eyed loon with a TikTok channel has told them what those documents say. And if they have read them, they sure as hell didn't understand them
And what do you do? Just pay it like a mug?
@@Another-li2qn If what i've done was actually against the law and i was issued a fine for that infraction then yes, why wouldn't you?
You disagreeing with the law doesn't change that it exists and that you are going to have to comply with them, so unless i didn't actually commit said infraction then yes i would have no actual valid reason not to pay it
@@Another-li2qn Alternatively pay it plus a fine and legal expenses, like an idiot.
@@shanematthews1985 So if parliament enacted "legislation" that said you have to give all your assets and money to the government tomorrow and every day thereafter. you would do it, would you? Because it's what the "rules" say? the "Law" apparently.
And yet they tax you, fine you and bill you more and more year on year and somehow that's different?
Why is it the government can demand an arbitrary amount from you and you have to pay it or they will bully you, take your property and cause harm? Does that actually sound right to you?
Think about it. If I sent you a demand and called it a fine for "X" would you just pay it? Why not? Because I can't demand it. So why can they demand it? Because they made a law up that says you have to?
I'm only asking that people think rationally about this, it's all warped!!!
You said yoirself it is a statutaory law, which means it has the same weight as common law if you consent to it, i.e. if you volunteer to accept it. Acts and Statutes fall outside the remit of common law. What do you say about that?
As you asked, I'd say you were talking utter crap and have been watching too much TikTok
Your consent is not required where laws exist, its not that complicated to understand
I’d think we would all be hearing a lot more about the “I don’t voluntarily accept the law” defence if it was actually valid in court.
@Batters56 They're very reluctant to accept that if one were to take an empirical view as to what is and what is not, their 0% success rate might be a rather clear indication of the fact that whatever they believe, everyone who matters thinks rather differently.
Totally incorrect
Local government finance act 1992. Deems it unlawfully.
Don't want to pay council tax, don't complain about potholes... Complain about potholes after you've paid council tax.
And donvt complain about police. Don't call the fire brigade when their house is on fire.....schools.... Housing. Health and social care
The list goes on.
@@Rachel_M_ so how did those services operate before council tax?
@@latotheleaf2223 Immediately prior to CT it was the Community Charge, aka the Poll Tax, and prior to that it was through domestic rates based on the value of residential homes. All of those three are/were taxes created by statute, paid by the residents of the particular local authority to fund the services the LA provided.
@@latotheleaf2223 council services usued to be paid for by something called "Rates"
Then, in the late 80s/early 90's Maggie Thatcher changed it to The Poll Tax, which was vehemently opposed by the population, with a massive demonstration in London, before it was changed to Council Tax.
I was born in 1976 so if you have any more questions about the time before the internet I'm all ears.
@@latotheleaf2223 they also receive, and have always received, funding from Central Government (paid for by Taxes), Business Rates from businesses within their Unitary Authority, and other sources such as byelaws with financial penalties.
All I hear from the FOTL types is "I want all the benefits with none of the responsibilities". Seems to be a very common message from the Marxists too.
Now where did Marx get his funding to live his life? (Spoiler Alert: He was a freeloader)
That's why i call FOTL types "Freeloaders Of The Land"
When will the land appropriation act be used?
The what?
Never because it’s not a thing
Daniel, darling, can you ditch the flashing lights please - they're annoying. And you're not Boney M.
Thanks for this 😊
you need reporting you should misleadl it is Fraud
Well I've not paid mine for years so that's complete nonsense
You don’t need to pay. Despite being thirty five years old you still live with your mum.
I love it that it brings the SovCits out from under their rocks
'SovCis' are loving all those likes Richard
@@juliaw7533 Given their room temperature IQ, I doubt it even registers
i Like you but your wrong on this 1
Some legalese being used
Legislation needs consent!!!
Do you think that if you keep saying that it will magically become true?
Incorrect
The public consents at the ballot box.
@@empressdawnius not the consent of each individual.
Your interpretation is way off
@ubiquitousubiquitous3843 I've often thought that the UK education system needs a civics course like they have in the US and the amount of drivel spouted on here proves the point. Juries striking out legislation? Now that is a new one...
Act is consenting lol.
Councils are corporations. Show me the law that says I must buy any good or service.
You clearly haven't watched this video. Try again
Wrong, watch the vid
@Phil I watched the vid and the vid is wrong. Seems you think everything he says is 100% accurate.
You buffoon
There is legislation that says you have to, but clearly you didn't watch the video.
Agreed
Doesn't statutory law work by consent??? I do not consent to statutory law ..I agree with common sense law
"Doesn't statutory law work by consent???"
No. Next....
Your correct it works by force and bloody mindedness
Not individual consent no
You say that like it actually works now ..we are consumed by statutory law..
While we're pontificating about the law I see the Tories have reinstated the witch finder general..they call it the single justice system..we all know it's so they can burn any witches when they decide who they are