7psi is a pressure ratio of 1.48 10psi is a pressure ratio of 1.69 Multiplied is a pressure ratio of 2.5 Which is a positive pressure of 21.8 seems negligible considering we dont have the raw data and we don't know in increase of the air temp. Awesome video, love seeing actual engineering in "real world" testing!
Dammit, man. I'm building a 3.8 SC Fiero. Keep up the tech talks on these engines... I have TWO grand prix gtp drivetrains on the way for my conversion. i could use some ideas ;)
I looked up some forum posts about this that were posted like 10 yrs ago and wow, people just didn't have their facts straight concerning the math on how this works, whether it could be done and what and how to do it. At lease with this engine. I want to build up my daily driver SSEi like this but not do it exactly the same. not with the exact parts Richard used and stay with the OE PCM if that could be done. Richard used a series 3 which has the powedered hot forged steel rods and I'm still running a set of nicely customized Cast rods and OE pistons but really would like to build my engine with a set of moly rods and forged pistons, and a bit less compression ratio to assist with the turbo part and the higher boost pressures. Get it down to closer to a flat 8:1 instead of 8.5. And install the intercooler, Air to water. under the S.C'r, wondering how it would work to have a cooler after the turbo then under the charger, if the heat exchanger would be able to handle both cooling cores?
Perfect timing. Just sat down with some Italian food on the couch ! Also had a n/a 3800 in my Oldsmobile when I was a kid. Always wished it had a blower !
So a lot of guys who run the turbo and the blower will setup the bypass valve on the supercharger to open once the turbo starts producing some boost. The theory is that the turbo is going to be more efficient at making power so with the bypass valve open the turbo does all of the work and keeps the temps cooler, and reduces the parasitic loss from the blower. Then they would just reference total boost pressure from the turbo for the wastegate but have it set higher than what the supercharger can produce I personally have always wanted to try it the way you did it here, I figure why not let the supercharger compound it a bit if it's going to be there and just run an intercooler and/or E85 to keep things cool. Run a large pulley with the M90 to minimize the amount of heat it's making and still benefit from having the blower but let the turbo do the heavy lifting on the top end
Solid flat tappets have more parasitic loss than solid rollers but flat tappets go real big hp. Guys want to keep getting hung up on parasitics. Friction is the way of the engine.
Love seeing this, the 3800 finally getting the recognition it deserves. I hope he tries doing some testing with just a turbo alone. Should be some interesting numbers than.
Hi Richard, just wondering how the extra boost from the turbo gets past the positive displacement rotors. Let's say a 2.3 TVS supercharger, so a fixed 2.3 litres of air every revolution. While the air volume and supercharger speed are dictated by the engine rpm, how does the turbo air get past the supercharger rotors, as the supercharger rotors are set to engine speed. Does it just simply get pushed past the rotors.
Richard holder On one of his videos Gail Banks discovered that you can compound into a turbo because it likes high airflow But the positive displacement supercharger wasn't making very much additional horsepower when they compounded a turbo into it.. but it was producing an excessive amount of heat. Gail hypothesized that the blower doesn't like being compounded into it so if you could compound the blower into the turbo that would be ideal. Would be nice to see that blower, into an intercooler, into the turbo, into an after cooler, into the intake. Should compress the air most efficiently without excess heat
Thank you Richard very much appreciate the Buick v6 supercharged turbocharged compound combination, it's time to move on up to the current stuff that people are running today since you're all about the other guys engines, let's get a late model gen-6 Camaro 2.0L 4 cylinder turbo strap that puppy on up to your Dino and let's make some noise, and I have you know GM also made a 2.5L version of the same engine that was not available on the gen-6 Camaro, now that is something you might want to look into as well, you can get these engines relatively affordably, I can tell you this I own a 2018 Camaro with the 4-cylinder Turbo and I managed to get the car as fast as 1260s in 1/4 Mile and to my understanding there is more performance to be had from this combination, show us how it's done!...
The 2.5l is a big boy and theyre actually fairly common. Base Malibu and minitrucks have them and they are rated around 200hp. The turbo engines have a high density spincast head but there really arent much differences.when gm started pounding on these drag racing, the lost foam heads would start eroding the chambers and the heads would eventually fail. All of them from 2007 up have a better head and heavier PM rods and the geniii from 2013+ have a forged crank.the 2.0 has a little thicker sleeves and that might be important if you are running stupid boost. The 2.4l that was in millions of cars has port injection and a 58x trigger pattern. There is also lots of 10-15 year old cars in the junkyard. I am pretty sure it uses the same bellhousing and ignition trigger as the 3800 and would be pretty easy to get running on the dyno with port injection.
@@timothybayliss6680 I already installed a 2.5 in my current 2020 Camaro, I call it my pandemic special and of course there is an obvious boost in power and specially torque, although both the engines are nearly identical, the 2.5 has a 11:3 compression the intake ports on the heads are slightly bigger, I mailed the domes off the Pistons to make it turbo friendly, I gapped the Rings at 28, I use head studs to preserve the threads in the block, zzperformance office head studs for these engines at an ungodly amount of Monies, so I bought a head stud kit from Jegs at $95, the head studs to get are the Chinese studs for the early Gen 3 LS engines.
@Richard Holdner. I rev my motor to 7000rpm with ls7 lifters, double roller timing chain, big cam, stock pushrods, rockers, etc. I have a buddy who revs 7800 rpm
I loved this motor in my fiero. I wish i never sold that car. I will own another and after seeing that torque curve and 12psi at 3300 rpm i think this is how im doing my next car. Thanks man. Sick videos!!!!
I have a mercedes E55 that I added a turbo to. I added a PT6870 to the factory blower with stock pulley. I wanted more power and wanted to keep the brutal bottom end the E55 is known for. The project is a success! The car is a beast to drive and makes everybody scratch their head when they see it. I do suffer from a total lack of tuning support on the platform so a stand alone ECU is in the works for winter. Then I will turn it up and see how it goes. I have a banks data monster and I still need to add boost and temp taps out of the turbo and out of the blower to get more data, but my lack of traction show it is making a lot more power than before. I don't have any good video of it but there are a couple clips on my TH-cam account. Thanks Richard for the content I love it!
If I was to run a set up of this nature, I would go with a larger turbo. With the supercharger hitting down low, you don't have to worry about lag anymore and when the supercharger runs out of steam up top, thats when I would have the turbos come alive. Best of both worlds, toqrque down low and top end power of a turbo
There are other precursor engines to GM 3.8L V6, including the 3.3L V6 and the 3.0L V6. Do a stroker V6 for quicker boost and awesome HP gains. My former Pontiac Grand Am had a NA 3.3L V6 and OEM roller/hydraulic cam, just get larger valve covers to fit roller rocker arms and an easy 5-10 HP gain. Boosted, but only if the lower end of the engine had lower compression pistons and gas ported rings. Hint, hint, when porting heads, open up intake ports for better volume and minimal smoothing on exhaust ports for higher velocity, port matching, volumetric balance for best results. Now you have a selection of OEM roller hydraulic cam options, I wish you well.
Looks like you needed to regulate the wastegate post-blower to like 18 PSI for street maybe? Perhaps get more turbo down low and less pressure up high maybe? What would this have looked like with the larger blower pulley? VERY interesting Richard!! More compound testing please - this is really cool :)
A 231 Cubic inch engine with an M90 Eaton blower is "like" a 321 cubic inch engine normally aspirated. Add an M112, it's best assuming it is a 343 Before Turbo. So the extra compound boost isn't really limited by the extra "aluminum Eaton Lung"...your better off assuming it's now a 321 V8....before Turbo. The extra cubes of any postie displacement Roots style blower is about as volumeteically efficient as the engine it's sitting on is. VE tops out on both the 231 GM3800 and Eaton M90 at about 65% at peak rpm.
I agree with you in concept, but I do the math differently. If the blower is making around 8 psi then the volumetric efficiency is about 150% of NA so the 231 looks to the turbo like 347 ci.
last time i saw a blower being fed by a turbo on a gm v6 was a old detriot diesel 6v 92 engine.& it was only rated at 300 hp & 950 lb/ft. if i recall correctly.
Rising boost curve --> no intercooler --> the pressure will increase? But I would expect your E85 runs on the stock setup to have revealed this.... Boost should multiply, not sum (use Atmospheres not PSI) Instantly, the coolest engine series on TH-cam
Why use atmosphere (bar)? You will only confuse everyone and it just not a common term. unless you are around engineers. The blowers will usually always have a rising boost curve because of the drive ratio to the supercharger unless its too small.
@@krakhedd I am an engineer and I get it. But Bar is still an engineering term and the people that I usually deal with in the US do not measure in Bar but PSi I will not undervalue them just because its a simple atmosphere ratio. You can be a d*ck, or just provide knowledge based on peoples known pressure measurements.
@@victordahn2150 that's funny, because I'm not sitting here pondering the intelligence of any potential audience. I'm presuming they know or will figure it out if they don't. And that somehow makes me a term I shan't repeat, for giving them the benefit of the doubt? Get da fuq oudda here 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣✌️✌️✌️
Richard you did well on the subject of needing a turbo cam for turbocharging have you ran a solid roller cam with hydraulic lifters or hydraulic roller cam using solid roller lifters, if not it would be interesting.
Not a great idea running solid lifters on an hydraulic cam. Hydraulic cams typically have .006" closing ramps on both intake and exhaust. Solid Lifter cams usually have .012" intake and .018" exhaust. Over time, an hydraulic cam will beat up a solid lifter valvetrain. It's no problem to use hydraulic lifters on a solid lifter cam.
Interesting... I've got a series I L27. I also have a pairs of pre-series I LN3 heads, and one piece intake manifold (which I believe the intake can be mounted to a L27?)... Don't care for plastic intakes (plastic anything)... Any way, I haven't seen anything regarding the LN3, or L27 on your videos, but perhaps you can give me some advice in interchangeability, or differences compared to the 3800 engines you've built.
@@vicmccartin Turbo diesel engines are the best gotta love the low down torque. The only time I'd prefer a petrol/gasoline engine is for driving on sand.
I have a supercharged v6 I am wanting a eBay turbo added in not sure what I'll need besides a tune an to keep it street legal not sure if that would be possible but
In Aust we just built Chev bow tie V6, twin 3582 turbos. with all the good components. interested once it hits the dyno. we will let you know how it goes !
Great video, although I don't exactly know how it works (just my lack of reading and no first hand experience). However it would seem like doing something like this would improve the efficiency of the engine even though a roots style supercharger uses the engine to turn the rotors (I might be entirely incorrect though).
Compound turbos on a straight 5 or straight 6. Torque curves on those little motors is pretty amazing curious if a boost curve could be made to use the available torq throughout entire RPM. GT2860 and GT3582?? Possibly slightly larger big turbo.
I would like to see an NA series 3 (cast not plastic) upper and lower intake manifold on this before doin head/cam work. Would like to see boost levels to make the same horsepower. Also zzp makes an insert for them to supposedly help flow which would be another thing I would like to see dyno numbers on.
We need to see this same setup with that kenne belle you tested! Also I'd like to see what kinda power changes it makes going from e85 to say, E70, or E50, or even E25, because around here we only see 50-75% ethanol at the pump 90% of the time.
This is awesome. Do have a test with this same combination running the same 22 psi with the turbo on its own? How much power do you think it would make with no supercharger?
Would love if you can, to test camshafts in these motors. There’s a big market for reverse pattern turbo cams for this particular platform and I remember from your other videos you don’t think they’re the way to go. Would love to see if that stands true on the 3800s!
Richard, I didn’t hear or see anything on injectors. Did you change them out? I have a Vega LS race car with 5.3/vs racing turbo and the goodie’s you suggest. That car runs easy 9’s in the quarter. But I have a little beater that happens to be an 04 Grand Prix gtp with the 3800 sc. I had no idea that little engine could do this!!!! Great info. I may turn this into a sleeper.
Yeah, like the Bosch 2000’s I put in the Vega. I thought maybe these 3800 inj would support more for some reason since you didn’t mention them. I mean for a 04 Grand Prix, even 400 hp is a lot. This one has the under drive pulley’s and is chipped with good exhaust. Then your talking fuel pump etc etc. no thanks. I’ll put the 💰💰in the Vega.
He always gets it from the same station and with the weather in south California there probably isnt much difference between winter and summer blends. Its sketchy AF but its as good as you can do. I probably wouldn't do it without a flexfuel sensor if you were doing a cross country trip leaving Wisconsin in February
Hp wise and detonation wise ive not noticed much difference. Anything better than like 50-60% ethanol and it still works. The flow rate is obviously different to a higher % but if you use a flex sensor the ecu will compensate.
@@timothybayliss6680 All I run on 2 of my cars in SoCal is E85. Whether you're getting it from a Propel Fuel pump or a Pearson Fuels pump, the number is usually right in the 80%+/-2% according to my sensors. It's really super consistent because they don't need to change blends for the seasons as you say. If you tune for 80% ethanol that 2% variation is only going to change your mixture by about 1% rich/lean either way.
Richard, I know from one of your videos that the intercooler is very effective in removing heat from the intake charge, but would water meth injection have a big impact on top of the compound setup?
@@richardholdener1727 From what I know centrifugal superchargers tend to have cooler intake temps after the compressor. Which would be interesting to see how it effects performance if at all.
I would've added the smaller pulley and see what it would do. I know the supercharger alone petters out around the 400 range. But I'd port it to see the difference to.
So did you have variable timing each pull, or bump up the timing a little at a time each run? How do you get variable timing? An aftermarket management computer system?
the cam timing is not variable-but we do control the ignition timing (but that was fixed for each run), the timing does change based on rpm during the run
@@richardholdener1727 with an appropriate spring weight, I should add. If it was set for say, 20 psi, would it work? Would the supercharger even do anything?
okay, so why I would consider a supercharger and then a compounded turbo later, is I'd be using a vvt 1.6L engine that doesn't make a ton N/A maybe 95hp at the wheels but would build it for high rpm. I'd consider a compound dual turbo build, but I'm not sure if overall engine response would be worse, as I believe superchargers effectively increase lower rpm torque as well as overall torque vs a gradual increase with a single turbo
So I'm guessing the missing variable for the extra boost is the percentage of boost the blower is at over atmospheric. So in an equation it would look something like this 10+7a=23 guessing at your barometric pressure for that day I'm assuming about a 75% increase over atmospheric with blower only so if u solve for a=1.75 or 75% it comes out to 22.25psi and that's pretty close for what it is! So Kool that the blower boosts the boost!! Love your videos bud keep up the great work!
@@Joshie2256 that would= 21.82 psi pretty close to my quick math and both are a single psi or so from actual. we need actual barometric pressure readings from that day in that dyno cell to be any more accurate and still probably won't be exact do to heat expansion and other inefficiencies and variables we can't account for.
My understanding of compound boost systems is you multiply the individual pressure ratios together, not add them. So the turbo running 7psi has a PR of 1.4 and the supercharger at 12psi has a PR of 1.8. 1.4 * 1.8 = 2.6 (39psi) which is about 24psi(gauge) Really starts to make a big difference when the PR's are over both 2 (14.7psi)
You are both mistaken. You need to differentiate between PR and Boost PSI numbers. If the air being fed to the SC or small turbo is compressed then 14.7psi is no longer the atmospheric pressure it sees is it. I have a compound turbo setup on my car. Boost pressures do add together, however you need to look at it like this Big turbo ingests air from atmosphere which is 14.7psi and multiplies it by 2x for a total boost of 14.7psi gauge(29.4psi absolute) - So PR is 2:1 Small turbo(or sc) inlet sees 29.4psi absolute at its inlet now. So for it to also have a PR of 2:1 it has to output 29.4psi itself. So boost at the big turbo is 14.7psi and the small turbo is 29.4psi. Both PRs are still 2:1 and total boost is 44.1psi. 2:1 x 2:1 minus atmospheric pressure = 3bar or 44.1psi. Thats how boost PSi numbers can add together but the PRs do multiply. A great source of information is the compound turbo thread on yellowbullet.com by Kevin Jewer.
How could someone twincharge an LS V-8 using a M122 (GT500) Supercharger and a generic evay GT45 Turbocharger? Or is it even possible (if it is where could I find help or information to do so) thanks.
Thanks for your insight and fast response, I just cannot figure out how to route everything correctly on a M122 supercharger when paired with a turbocharger on an LS engine. I thought that by using a large roots style supercharger like an M122, that performance at lower rpms would become more possible than with a turbocharger(s). It appears that I was wrong about having the M122 blown into a turbocharger for optimum lower rpm performance. I'm obviously still pretty new to this forced induction thing.
What about removing the parasitic loss associated with the super…and simply running a larger intercooled turbo that supplies the same relative volume as the combo, but with lower charge temps and losses ?
My twin charged setup put down far more power than the highest output turbo only setup on this engine (stock cam). It increased the stock cam 3800 record from 430 whp to 498.
You spin wheel guys and your parasitic blah. Any engine is a system of parasitic losses, that’s what makes them work. The end result is the point not the losses. 500 instant Hp is what the EVs are supposed to be so impressive compared to 500 turbo horses. This would rip instantly. And 500 is just warming up with Mr. Holdener. Remember, world record hp, 1/4 mi times, and 350 mph+ comes from a roots whipple not a turbo. He said this wasn’t a max hp deal.
the Top Fuel uses a Roots blower-Whipple is a company that makes Twin Screw blowers (not allowed in Top Fuel) and (FYI) Turbos were outlawed in Top Fuel
Your compound boost setup worked better than Gale Banks'! The next part of the test that I hope you do is to run the turbo alone at the same intake manifold pressure, and see how the power compares.
I think that's because Gale was using a twin screw supercharger, which has internal compression, vs a roots, which is just an "air mover" that relies completely upon the restriction provided by the engine's ability to receive the incoming charge )or in the case of the Buick, lack thereof).
@@richardholdener1727 Yes, it was a 7.0 Duramax with a 5L Whipple, 2 turbos, an intercooler, and an aftercooler. He was trying to get 1200 hp, and couldn't make it. In the process of trying to figure out what was wrong, he slowed down the Whipple, and picked up -200 hp. But the bsfc of the engine was lousy, and the egt was way higher than a diesel should have. What frustrated me about Gale's test was he never posted interstage pressures.
It would, but it's more a function of the cams not letting that air in as RPM's rise. You'll notice the torque curve is the mirror-opposite of boost curve. The same air is flowing thru the blower per rev, but less thru the heads.
Great video as always! I was wondering, have you had the chance to test the NNBS LS Intake? It's the truck intake that comes with gen IV cathedral port engines, and some people say that it's the same as a TBSS intake 🤔
@@richardholdener1727 NNBS is like 07-13 5.3s, cathedral port and it is the same as the TBSS. It also looks just like the LY6 intake except it's cathedral port.
@@richardholdener1727 No, I meant the gen IV cathedral port truck intakes. Either way, my question is answered so thanks! :) PS: NNBS stands for New New Body Style.
If you want a ridiculous "other guys" motor? You should try a twin turbo setup on a 2000-2004 Ford 3.8L v6. I had a 2000 V6 Mustang with a twin turbo that made 370 wheel horsepower and 398ft-lbs at 13psi with a pair of t3/t04 hybrid turbos. Wasn't as fast as a cobra, but the insurance was way cheaper!
The thing I miss the most from these type of tests are the BSFC data comparisons, yes I might be making 400 hp but how efficiently, is it using 20% more than a 6.0L LS for example?, that's a comparison I would like to see
You keep saying tell me in the comments then you are totally dismissive in your replies, I did not infer it was about that but curiosity killed the cat, it about comparing or why bother testing ! I like boosted smaller displacement as it can enable fuel economy when not running under boost hence OEM fascination with DOD etc, if I can get 600whp on demand but get say 4.8L economy without DOD reliability issues knowing the BSFC is almost the same at 600hp of a 6.2L NA, it's almost like you haven't learnt to accept constructive criticism 😔p
That's amazing! Looks like our Commodore is getting a turbo with it's supercharger!
Yeah Scotty that’ll be sweet 👍
Do it, makes for great content
F yes!
Everyone has been "oh nah the charger becomes a restriction" phhh love that this guy has shown that it can be done with great results
7psi is a pressure ratio of 1.48
10psi is a pressure ratio of 1.69
Multiplied is a pressure ratio of 2.5
Which is a positive pressure of 21.8 seems negligible considering we dont have the raw data and we don't know in increase of the air temp. Awesome video, love seeing actual engineering in "real world" testing!
This is a nugget of gold good sir thank you
Dammit, man. I'm building a 3.8 SC Fiero. Keep up the tech talks on these engines... I have TWO grand prix gtp drivetrains on the way for my conversion. i could use some ideas ;)
A fiero with a compound set up would be amazing! 500 hoarse fiero would be ferocious
I looked up some forum posts about this that were posted like 10 yrs ago and wow, people just didn't have their facts straight concerning the math on how this works, whether it could be done and what and how to do it. At lease with this engine. I want to build up my daily driver SSEi like this but not do it exactly the same. not with the exact parts Richard used and stay with the OE PCM if that could be done. Richard used a series 3 which has the powedered hot forged steel rods and I'm still running a set of nicely customized Cast rods and OE pistons but really would like to build my engine with a set of moly rods and forged pistons, and a bit less compression ratio to assist with the turbo part and the higher boost pressures. Get it down to closer to a flat 8:1 instead of 8.5. And install the intercooler, Air to water. under the S.C'r, wondering how it would work to have a cooler after the turbo then under the charger, if the heat exchanger would be able to handle both cooling cores?
Perfect timing. Just sat down with some Italian food on the couch ! Also had a n/a 3800 in my Oldsmobile when I was a kid. Always wished it had a blower !
Yea man i swear he has the best timing on youtube. Not just timing but the content always seems to be what your looking for!
Love it!!! I think this series is going to surprise ALOT of people!!! 1000hp or bust!
These motors have already proven over 1k hp Google zzp and look up their twin turbo gt or ttgt.
So a lot of guys who run the turbo and the blower will setup the bypass valve on the supercharger to open once the turbo starts producing some boost. The theory is that the turbo is going to be more efficient at making power so with the bypass valve open the turbo does all of the work and keeps the temps cooler, and reduces the parasitic loss from the blower.
Then they would just reference total boost pressure from the turbo for the wastegate but have it set higher than what the supercharger can produce
I personally have always wanted to try it the way you did it here, I figure why not let the supercharger compound it a bit if it's going to be there and just run an intercooler and/or E85 to keep things cool. Run a large pulley with the M90 to minimize the amount of heat it's making and still benefit from having the blower but let the turbo do the heavy lifting on the top end
Solid flat tappets have more parasitic loss than solid rollers but flat tappets go real big hp.
Guys want to keep getting hung up on parasitics. Friction is the way of the engine.
Love seeing this, the 3800 finally getting the recognition it deserves. I hope he tries doing some testing with just a turbo alone. Should be some interesting numbers than.
I was thinking the same, a nice turbo with a good intercooler and 20psi +.
3800s have been 140mph in the 1/4 at full weight 🤷🏻♂️
They're a solid motor, they just sound like shit 😂
Hi Richard, just wondering how the extra boost from the turbo gets past the positive displacement rotors. Let's say a 2.3 TVS supercharger, so a fixed 2.3 litres of air every revolution. While the air volume and supercharger speed are dictated by the engine rpm, how does the turbo air get past the supercharger rotors, as the supercharger rotors are set to engine speed. Does it just simply get pushed past the rotors.
the effectiveness of the blower increases dramatically when you add positive pressure feeding the blower (just like any pump)
Richard holder
On one of his videos Gail Banks discovered that you can compound into a turbo because it likes high airflow
But the positive displacement supercharger wasn't making very much additional horsepower when they compounded a turbo into it.. but it was producing an excessive amount of heat.
Gail hypothesized that the blower doesn't like being compounded into it so if you could compound the blower into the turbo that would be ideal.
Would be nice to see that blower, into an intercooler, into the turbo, into an after cooler, into the intake.
Should compress the air most efficiently without excess heat
Plus supercharger whine.....which ya just gotta have.
I just watched that video.
I love compound. I did this to a Probe GT back around 2006-2007. Trapped over 120mph in a probe, lol.
The good ol anal probe. You don't see them anymore.
@@faststang89 Like NEVER see them - it's weird the way they all disappeared! A GF of mine had one in pink but it drove nice at least lol
Checkout boosted speed demon on TH-cam. He claims to have the world's fasted probe
@@wework4beer Ha, awesome!
Keep the 3800 vids COMING!!! Thank you good sir.
Thank you Richard very much appreciate the Buick v6 supercharged turbocharged compound combination, it's time to move on up to the current stuff that people are running today since you're all about the other guys engines, let's get a late model gen-6 Camaro 2.0L 4 cylinder turbo strap that puppy on up to your Dino and let's make some noise, and I have you know GM also made a 2.5L version of the same engine that was not available on the gen-6 Camaro, now that is something you might want to look into as well, you can get these engines relatively affordably, I can tell you this I own a 2018 Camaro with the 4-cylinder Turbo and I managed to get the car as fast as 1260s in 1/4 Mile and to my understanding there is more performance to be had from this combination, show us how it's done!...
The 2.5l is a big boy and theyre actually fairly common. Base Malibu and minitrucks have them and they are rated around 200hp. The turbo engines have a high density spincast head but there really arent much differences.when gm started pounding on these drag racing, the lost foam heads would start eroding the chambers and the heads would eventually fail. All of them from 2007 up have a better head and heavier PM rods and the geniii from 2013+ have a forged crank.the 2.0 has a little thicker sleeves and that might be important if you are running stupid boost. The 2.4l that was in millions of cars has port injection and a 58x trigger pattern. There is also lots of 10-15 year old cars in the junkyard. I am pretty sure it uses the same bellhousing and ignition trigger as the 3800 and would be pretty easy to get running on the dyno with port injection.
its funny you think I can afford a 2018 turbo vehicle or even the engine
@@richardholdener1727 alright dude I'm sorry I put it out there...😞
@@timothybayliss6680 I already installed a 2.5 in my current 2020 Camaro, I call it my pandemic special and of course there is an obvious boost in power and specially torque, although both the engines are nearly identical, the 2.5 has a 11:3 compression the intake ports on the heads are slightly bigger, I mailed the domes off the Pistons to make it turbo friendly, I gapped the Rings at 28, I use head studs to preserve the threads in the block, zzperformance office head studs for these engines at an ungodly amount of Monies, so I bought a head stud kit from Jegs at $95, the head studs to get are the Chinese studs for the early Gen 3 LS engines.
@@richardholdener1727 same problem many hot rodders run into, that's why we're hooked on this other guys series 👍👍
@Richard Holdner. I rev my motor to 7000rpm with ls7 lifters, double roller timing chain, big cam, stock pushrods, rockers, etc. I have a buddy who revs 7800 rpm
I loved this motor in my fiero. I wish i never sold that car. I will own another and after seeing that torque curve and 12psi at 3300 rpm i think this is how im doing my next car. Thanks man. Sick videos!!!!
Running the individual coils looks pretty nice on the 3800 compared to the coil packs.
I have a mercedes E55 that I added a turbo to. I added a PT6870 to the factory blower with stock pulley. I wanted more power and wanted to keep the brutal bottom end the E55 is known for. The project is a success! The car is a beast to drive and makes everybody scratch their head when they see it. I do suffer from a total lack of tuning support on the platform so a stand alone ECU is in the works for winter. Then I will turn it up and see how it goes. I have a banks data monster and I still need to add boost and temp taps out of the turbo and out of the blower to get more data, but my lack of traction show it is making a lot more power than before. I don't have any good video of it but there are a couple clips on my TH-cam account. Thanks Richard for the content I love it!
Did it blow up yet?
@@TrumpWonGetOverIt not yet
@@BATworkshop did it blow up yet??
@@AllWbody no it still runs well. I will get it on my dyno soon and see what it makes.
@@BATworkshop dang nice didn’t think you would reply honestly lol gonna check out your channel
That torque curve is sick. This thing will be wild with a cam.
If I was to run a set up of this nature, I would go with a larger turbo. With the supercharger hitting down low, you don't have to worry about lag anymore and when the supercharger runs out of steam up top, thats when I would have the turbos come alive. Best of both worlds, toqrque down low and top end power of a turbo
This is what I am talking about. I have wanted to do this with the 4.0l v6 Mustang,lol wow!!!
If you've ever been ready to load in a motor on a dyno and got a bog and a pop,,, GO AHEAD AND HIT THAT SUBSRIBE BUTTON!
There are other precursor engines to GM 3.8L V6, including the 3.3L V6 and the 3.0L V6. Do a stroker V6 for quicker boost and awesome HP gains. My former Pontiac Grand Am had a NA 3.3L V6 and OEM roller/hydraulic cam, just get larger valve covers to fit roller rocker arms and an easy 5-10 HP gain. Boosted, but only if the lower end of the engine had lower compression pistons and gas ported rings. Hint, hint, when porting heads, open up intake ports for better volume and minimal smoothing on exhaust ports for higher velocity, port matching, volumetric balance for best results. Now you have a selection of OEM roller hydraulic cam options, I wish you well.
Looks like you needed to regulate the wastegate post-blower to like 18 PSI for street maybe? Perhaps get more turbo down low and less pressure up high maybe? What would this have looked like with the larger blower pulley? VERY interesting Richard!! More compound testing please - this is really cool :)
That’s a cool video, how about removing the supercharger and running 22psi just from the turbo? Would be great to see the comparison peak power
Peak power would be same given similar iats. But the torque curve will loose out on alot imo...
@@Saddedude -parasitic loss
This would be a nasty drift setup. I love it!!!!! Been waiting a long time to see this. Thanks Richard you’re the man!
I saw a compound setup like this at motorama Toronto a few years ago in a Toyota or Nissan 5.7 v8 , in a cool classic JDM car.
Question can you do the same on the Ford 3.8 V6 wonder what you can get out of those engines as well.
A 231 Cubic inch engine with an M90 Eaton blower is "like" a 321 cubic inch engine normally aspirated. Add an M112, it's best assuming it is a 343 Before Turbo. So the extra compound boost isn't really limited by the extra "aluminum Eaton Lung"...your better off assuming it's now a 321 V8....before Turbo. The extra cubes of any postie displacement Roots style blower is about as volumeteically efficient as the engine it's sitting on is. VE tops out on both the 231 GM3800 and Eaton M90 at about 65% at peak rpm.
I agree with you in concept, but I do the math differently. If the blower is making around 8 psi then the volumetric efficiency is about 150% of NA so the 231 looks to the turbo like 347 ci.
Next step: swapping to n/a manifold, w straight turbo? Amazing work as always
last time i saw a blower being fed by a turbo on a gm v6 was a old detriot diesel 6v 92 engine.& it was only rated at 300 hp & 950 lb/ft. if i recall correctly.
Yeah it's a 2 stroke diesel. Iirc all 2 stroke diesels need a SC
this is possibly the coolest test yet but flipping pistons would smooth out the boost from supercharger .too soon?
I'LL ASK SMOKEY!
@@richardholdener1727 it might be awhile before you get a answer though.🤣
Rising boost curve --> no intercooler --> the pressure will increase? But I would expect your E85 runs on the stock setup to have revealed this....
Boost should multiply, not sum (use Atmospheres not PSI)
Instantly, the coolest engine series on TH-cam
Why use atmosphere (bar)? You will only confuse everyone and it just not a common term. unless you are around engineers. The blowers will usually always have a rising boost curve because of the drive ratio to the supercharger unless its too small.
@@victordahn2150 cuz that's the math dude....you do not get 49 psi of boost from a pair of 7psi boost stages; you get ~1.25*14.7
@@krakhedd I am an engineer and I get it. But Bar is still an engineering term and the people that I usually deal with in the US do not measure in Bar but PSi I will not undervalue them just because its a simple atmosphere ratio. You can be a d*ck, or just provide knowledge based on peoples known pressure measurements.
@@victordahn2150 that's funny, because I'm not sitting here pondering the intelligence of any potential audience. I'm presuming they know or will figure it out if they don't. And that somehow makes me a term I shan't repeat, for giving them the benefit of the doubt? Get da fuq oudda here 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣✌️✌️✌️
Fantastic. Shows how well the charger helps the turbo spool, as that's a lot low down from the turbo. Love it
Richard you did well on the subject of needing a turbo cam for turbocharging have you ran a solid roller cam with hydraulic lifters or hydraulic roller cam using solid roller lifters, if not it would be interesting.
yes-that has been done at westech a lot on BBC applications
Not a great idea running solid lifters on an hydraulic cam. Hydraulic cams typically have .006" closing ramps on both intake and exhaust. Solid Lifter cams usually have .012" intake and .018" exhaust. Over time, an hydraulic cam will beat up a solid lifter valvetrain. It's no problem to use hydraulic lifters on a solid lifter cam.
@@richardholdener1727 Any issues that you can state?
Every time I see you and a 3800 I get excited can't wait for more. Super excited to see turbo only. What 80lbs were you running in this vid?
accel (deka)
Interesting... I've got a series I L27. I also have a pairs of pre-series I LN3 heads, and one piece intake manifold (which I believe the intake can be mounted to a L27?)... Don't care for plastic intakes (plastic anything)... Any way, I haven't seen anything regarding the LN3, or L27 on your videos, but perhaps you can give me some advice in interchangeability, or differences compared to the 3800 engines you've built.
I want to see what this engine can handle..... I feel its coming soon!!!
Btw... that tourque curve is beautiful 😍
Plenty of people have seen 700 on a stock block with single turbo setups. Wonder if he’ll get near that
These engines were popular swaps into Toyota Hilux/Tacoma in Australia with conversion kits
3800s are great but id rather have a 22re anyday. We didn't get the diesel engines in America sadly
@@vicmccartin Turbo diesel engines are the best gotta love the low down torque. The only time I'd prefer a petrol/gasoline engine is for driving on sand.
I have seen this on 4.6 sohc motors. They ported the blower a little bit to allow the turbos to contribute better.
I have a supercharged v6 I am wanting a eBay turbo added in not sure what I'll need besides a tune an to keep it street legal not sure if that would be possible but
Can you do a dyno on the L32 Gm 3.4 V6 from 93-95 Camero / Firebird some of these come with a five spd
WOW. Excellent work Richard, interesting video!
In Aust we just built Chev bow tie V6, twin 3582 turbos. with all the good components. interested once it hits the dyno. we will let you know how it goes !
definitely
Great video, although I don't exactly know how it works (just my lack of reading and no first hand experience). However it would seem like doing something like this would improve the efficiency of the engine even though a roots style supercharger uses the engine to turn the rotors (I might be entirely incorrect though).
That boost curve with just the blower are you sure the blower isn't worn out I can't remember if that supercharger has internal seals
Compound turbos on a straight 5 or straight 6. Torque curves on those little motors is pretty amazing curious if a boost curve could be made to use the available torq throughout entire RPM. GT2860 and GT3582?? Possibly slightly larger big turbo.
Compound setups Stack Boost! AKA Adds to the primary Boost and HP!
That's awesome, now I really want to see what kind of power it can actually make/handle.
People say 600 on stock bottom end all day long.
I would like to see an NA series 3 (cast not plastic) upper and lower intake manifold on this before doin head/cam work. Would like to see boost levels to make the same horsepower. Also zzp makes an insert for them to supposedly help flow which would be another thing I would like to see dyno numbers on.
Cool, now we want to see twin turbos with a 671 blower on a big block running E85...HOLY SHEEEET!!!!!!!!!
Keep it coming Richard ! Loving these videos
I have a couple questions about this exact build with a smaller subaru motor. Can't find correct cfm airflow for the m90
YOU DON'T NEED CFM-YOU JUST NEED POWER POTENTIAL
We need to see this same setup with that kenne belle you tested! Also I'd like to see what kinda power changes it makes going from e85 to say, E70, or E50, or even E25, because around here we only see 50-75% ethanol at the pump 90% of the time.
down to e50-the power likely won't change
This is awesome. Do have a test with this same combination running the same 22 psi with the turbo on its own? How much power do you think it would make with no supercharger?
it makes a lot more with just the turbo
lets see a video about that terminator compound dyno you mentioned!
Ive got an old Oldsmobile carbureted 3800 which is a 231ci i think? Its a great little engine. I wonder if i can do anything with it?
yes
Sweet test!! Priceless info bro! That's why we keep watching... 😎👍
Would love if you can, to test camshafts in these motors. There’s a big market for reverse pattern turbo cams for this particular platform and I remember from your other videos you don’t think they’re the way to go. Would love to see if that stands true on the 3800s!
Great Idea-reverse pattern cams
Look at this and really see the benefit the Thunderbird SC had with its intercooler. Even with first Gen blower made more torque.
Richard, I didn’t hear or see anything on injectors. Did you change them out? I have a Vega LS race car with 5.3/vs racing turbo and the goodie’s you suggest. That car runs easy 9’s in the quarter. But I have a little beater that happens to be an 04 Grand Prix gtp with the 3800 sc. I had no idea that little engine could do this!!!! Great info. I may turn this into a sleeper.
you need injectors to support the desired power level
Yeah, like the Bosch 2000’s I put in the Vega. I thought maybe these 3800 inj would support more for some reason since you didn’t mention them. I mean for a 04 Grand Prix, even 400 hp is a lot. This one has the under drive pulley’s and is chipped with good exhaust. Then your talking fuel pump etc etc. no thanks. I’ll put the 💰💰in the Vega.
My question is are you running pump e85 or barrels? I've heard a lot of talk that the consistency isn't there on the pump stuff
He's said before it pump from a gas station right there by west tech
He always gets it from the same station and with the weather in south California there probably isnt much difference between winter and summer blends. Its sketchy AF but its as good as you can do. I probably wouldn't do it without a flexfuel sensor if you were doing a cross country trip leaving Wisconsin in February
Hp wise and detonation wise ive not noticed much difference. Anything better than like 50-60% ethanol and it still works. The flow rate is obviously different to a higher % but if you use a flex sensor the ecu will compensate.
@@timothybayliss6680 All I run on 2 of my cars in SoCal is E85. Whether you're getting it from a Propel Fuel pump or a Pearson Fuels pump, the number is usually right in the 80%+/-2% according to my sensors. It's really super consistent because they don't need to change blends for the seasons as you say. If you tune for 80% ethanol that 2% variation is only going to change your mixture by about 1% rich/lean either way.
Richard,
I know from one of your videos that the intercooler is very effective in removing heat from the intake charge, but would water meth injection have a big impact on top of the compound setup?
IT HELPS REDUCE TEMPS AND DETONATION POTENTIAL
@@richardholdener1727 So per what you presented, one could run more timing / boost with an increased threshold for detonation?
This is pretty cool! I would love to see a 5.3 engine with a 671 blower with a GT45/7875 combo would do!
Keep the amazing videos going Richard!
Probably need to port the blower and bigger throttle body for huge gains.
Can we get a cam or a higher rocker ratio for this? Let it breath a little more.
very cool !!!! id really like to see a 4.3 vortec test with a 3582, gt45, 6262 ect...
what if you had put just a intercooler infront of the supercharger?
can u get a valley spacer for the m90.. and e85 i wanna see give air more time to cool and plenum area
it needs an intercooler
Could you one day do a dyno comparison with Aviation 100LL . A lot of people I know use it in two stroke race bikes
Hi Richard, how does the turbo air get past the supercharger rotors.
same way it gets past without the turbo-there is enough room
Shouldn't the boost be tapering off back into the compressors efficiency range? Boost creeping?
why
How about a procharger ( or any centrifugal supercharger) blowing into a whipple ( or any twin screw super)?
why?
@@richardholdener1727 From what I know centrifugal superchargers tend to have cooler intake temps after the compressor. Which would be interesting to see how it effects performance if at all.
What do you think the cylinder pressure is at 22 lb?
I would've added the smaller pulley and see what it would do. I know the supercharger alone petters out around the 400 range. But I'd port it to see the difference to.
So did you have variable timing each pull, or bump up the timing a little at a time each run?
How do you get variable timing? An aftermarket management computer system?
the cam timing is not variable-but we do control the ignition timing (but that was fixed for each run), the timing does change based on rpm during the run
@@richardholdener1727 will the timing change during the pull with a stock ecu?
I'm curious, is there a reason to not wastegate reference post supercharger?
yes-because it will be open all the time-that was covered in the video
@@richardholdener1727 with an appropriate spring weight, I should add. If it was set for say, 20 psi, would it work? Would the supercharger even do anything?
okay, so why I would consider a supercharger and then a compounded turbo later, is I'd be using a vvt 1.6L engine that doesn't make a ton N/A maybe 95hp at the wheels but would build it for high rpm. I'd consider a compound dual turbo build, but I'm not sure if overall engine response would be worse, as I believe superchargers effectively increase lower rpm torque as well as overall torque vs a gradual increase with a single turbo
Great stuff. Are you going to test this engine, with just a turbo ?
Thanks for all the testing you do for us.
That's the plan!
I think the cylinder heads and cam are terrible. Fix this and the boost will drop at the high end with a massive increase in power.
So I'm guessing the missing variable for the extra boost is the percentage of boost the blower is at over atmospheric. So in an equation it would look something like this 10+7a=23 guessing at your barometric pressure for that day I'm assuming about a 75% increase over atmospheric with blower only so if u solve for a=1.75 or 75% it comes out to 22.25psi and that's pretty close for what it is! So Kool that the blower boosts the boost!! Love your videos bud keep up the great work!
To figure out the final boost you multiply the pressure ratio of the supercharger and the turbo. (14.5 + boost/14.5)(14.5 + boost/14.5)*14.5 - 14.5
@@Joshie2256 that would= 21.82 psi pretty close to my quick math and both are a single psi or so from actual. we need actual barometric pressure readings from that day in that dyno cell to be any more accurate and still probably won't be exact do to heat expansion and other inefficiencies and variables we can't account for.
Great video Richard, is the answer for the people chasing power from the l67 v6 cheaply
My understanding of compound boost systems is you multiply the individual pressure ratios together, not add them.
So the turbo running 7psi has a PR of 1.4 and the supercharger at 12psi has a PR of 1.8.
1.4 * 1.8 = 2.6 (39psi) which is about 24psi(gauge)
Really starts to make a big difference when the PR's are over both 2 (14.7psi)
You are correct, the pressure ratios multiply
You are both mistaken.
You need to differentiate between PR and Boost PSI numbers. If the air being fed to the SC or small turbo is compressed then 14.7psi is no longer the atmospheric pressure it sees is it.
I have a compound turbo setup on my car. Boost pressures do add together, however you need to look at it like this
Big turbo ingests air from atmosphere which is 14.7psi and multiplies it by 2x for a total boost of 14.7psi gauge(29.4psi absolute) - So PR is 2:1
Small turbo(or sc) inlet sees 29.4psi absolute at its inlet now. So for it to also have a PR of 2:1 it has to output 29.4psi itself.
So boost at the big turbo is 14.7psi and the small turbo is 29.4psi. Both PRs are still 2:1 and total boost is 44.1psi.
2:1 x 2:1 minus atmospheric pressure = 3bar or 44.1psi.
Thats how boost PSi numbers can add together but the PRs do multiply. A great source of information is the compound turbo thread on yellowbullet.com by Kevin Jewer.
I was hoping you would get around to doing a compound setup. They were very common in Detroit diesels that I worked on many moons ago .
They're fairly common on Dodge 6BTA Cummins setups in my area now.
I would love to see this setup actually in something, I think a Buick Park Avenue would be awesome.
Early 90’s Bonneville or Oldsmobile 88.
@@RHYNOMAN12 Bonneville would be a sleeper for sure haha
How are you monitoring knock on all these different motors?
we don't
So my 2012 impala Lt runs on e85 and pump gas. Stock rated 303 HP. What could I put on it to get 450-500 whp??????
boost
Hey Richard! I have a question about the compound boost setup. What did you do with the M90 bypass valve?
both sides of it were under boost so it was not part of the picture
@@richardholdener1727 Thank you!
How could someone twincharge an LS V-8 using a M122 (GT500) Supercharger and a generic evay GT45 Turbocharger? Or is it even possible (if it is where could I find help or information to do so) thanks.
it is possible but the gt45 turbo would be too small for that application (otherwise works just like it did here)
Thanks for your insight and fast response, I just cannot figure out how to route everything correctly on a M122 supercharger when paired with a turbocharger on an LS engine. I thought that by using a large roots style supercharger like an M122, that performance at lower rpms would become more possible than with a turbocharger(s). It appears that I was wrong about having the M122 blown into a turbocharger for optimum lower rpm performance. I'm obviously still pretty new to this forced induction thing.
really interesting video .Great work
What about removing the parasitic loss associated with the super…and simply running a larger intercooled turbo that supplies the same relative volume as the combo, but with lower charge temps and losses ?
My twin charged setup put down far more power than the highest output turbo only setup on this engine (stock cam). It increased the stock cam 3800 record from 430 whp to 498.
You spin wheel guys and your parasitic blah. Any engine is a system of parasitic losses, that’s what makes them work. The end result is the point not the losses. 500 instant Hp is what the EVs are supposed to be so impressive compared to 500 turbo horses. This would rip instantly. And 500 is just warming up with Mr. Holdener. Remember, world record hp, 1/4 mi times, and 350 mph+ comes from a roots whipple not a turbo.
He said this wasn’t a max hp deal.
the Top Fuel uses a Roots blower-Whipple is a company that makes Twin Screw blowers (not allowed in Top Fuel) and (FYI) Turbos were outlawed in Top Fuel
Your compound boost setup worked better than Gale Banks'!
The next part of the test that I hope you do is to run the turbo alone at the same intake manifold pressure, and see how the power compares.
I think that's because Gale was using a twin screw supercharger, which has internal compression, vs a roots, which is just an "air mover" that relies completely upon the restriction provided by the engine's ability to receive the incoming charge )or in the case of the Buick, lack thereof).
Gale Banks, king of finding a "problem" that doesn't exist and "banking" off of poorly educated viewership.
I think his test was done on diesel
@@richardholdener1727 Yes, it was a 7.0 Duramax with a 5L Whipple, 2 turbos, an intercooler, and an aftercooler. He was trying to get 1200 hp, and couldn't make it. In the process of trying to figure out what was wrong, he slowed down the Whipple, and picked up -200 hp. But the bsfc of the engine was lousy, and the egt was way higher than a diesel should have. What frustrated me about Gale's test was he never posted interstage pressures.
Don't suppose you'd do a series like this for the 3.6L pentastar, would you? Lol
This is great knowledge. Reminds me a little of 15-20 years ago "the old one" and honda knowledge... his endyn site was pure gold
No idea why you do this but fascinating all the same!
To make power
I wonder if the coating is all gone, that would lower the low end rpm psi from the blower
It would, but it's more a function of the cams not letting that air in as RPM's rise. You'll notice the torque curve is the mirror-opposite of boost curve. The same air is flowing thru the blower per rev, but less thru the heads.
Super cool. I bet the drivability would be great on that combo.
Great video as always! I was wondering, have you had the chance to test the NNBS LS Intake? It's the truck intake that comes with gen IV cathedral port engines, and some people say that it's the same as a TBSS intake 🤔
Yes he has.
the rec-port ly6 truck intake (if that is what you mean by NNBS) is as good as the LS3 intake. The cathedral ports are different than the TBSS intake
@@richardholdener1727 NNBS is like 07-13 5.3s, cathedral port and it is the same as the TBSS. It also looks just like the LY6 intake except it's cathedral port.
@@richardholdener1727 No, I meant the gen IV cathedral port truck intakes. Either way, my question is answered so thanks! :)
PS: NNBS stands for New New Body Style.
If you want a ridiculous "other guys" motor? You should try a twin turbo setup on a 2000-2004 Ford 3.8L v6. I had a 2000 V6 Mustang with a twin turbo that made 370 wheel horsepower and 398ft-lbs at 13psi with a pair of t3/t04 hybrid turbos. Wasn't as fast as a cobra, but the insurance was way cheaper!
The thing I miss the most from these type of tests are the BSFC data comparisons, yes I might be making 400 hp but how efficiently, is it using 20% more than a 6.0L LS for example?, that's a comparison I would like to see
this test is not about that
You keep saying tell me in the comments then you are totally dismissive in your replies, I did not infer it was about that but curiosity killed the cat, it about comparing or why bother testing ! I like boosted smaller displacement as it can enable fuel economy when not running under boost hence OEM fascination with DOD etc, if I can get 600whp on demand but get say 4.8L economy without DOD reliability issues knowing the BSFC is almost the same at 600hp of a 6.2L NA, it's almost like you haven't learnt to accept constructive criticism 😔p
What turbo is it