It needs no commentary. The absence of commentary makes it visually transfixing. We do not need to have the wonder verbally pointed out to us. We do not need our attention or our thoughts directed. Leave it as it is. Let the viewer's own wonder and imagination take them over.
The best sounds I've heard on TH-cam in 6 months of watching 3 to 6 hours daily 7 days each week. It's amazing how it looks like these cuts were made with high-temperature blades. Some of the stuff later in the video looks like it was created by a plasma torch that melted grooves and holes. It's also amazing how religious people think they understand anything here at all. I really appreciate the lack of narration, just the visuals is what it's all about.
Microscopically the surfaces do look molten, I feel like plasma is the only way to get such high temps concentrated and controlled. However, the ‘nubs’ on the polygonal masonry looks like injection spots
I really like that this video has no commentaries and is not trying to propose any stupid conspiracy theories. Just pure evidence, think what you want.
Yes it is kind of refreshing. And now here comes the commentary : anyone who thinks that anyone else could cut those curved sections out of solid rock with Machine Tools, (even today!) has got to have rocks in their head
It's not about conspiracy theory, is more like, rejecting any hypothesis by the (oficcially established )historyans, I mean any theory that takes them out of their comfort zone .
Á anos pesquiso material na internet sobre as pedras cortadas dos sitios arqueológigicos sul americanos, e nunca tinha visto um trabalho de captação de imagens tão minuncioso q nem esse! Meus parabéns mesmo aos cinegrafistas e pesquisadores pelo belo trabajo
The most amazing thing about the world-wide existence of "ancient" mind-boggling stonework, is the scientific community's refusal to acknowledge its existence.
Scientists cannot understand how these ancients could have performed this with the tools they had at their disposal. It would be difficult today with our modern machines. This is not only here in Peru, these ancient techniques have been done world wide. Some of the rocks are as hard as diamonds.
Then, it is more accurate to suggest - the 'primitive tools of early man' theory is totally without accuracy or reason. What happened to these real tools then? They were used, used & recycled constantly until societal changes or catastrophe changed the direction of things.
@Oftin Wong Hard work and persistence is vital when working stone. But what do you use to cut and shape Basalt when the hardest material (assumed) to have existed at that time was copper? Maybe there was some technology or process that has been lost to us through the centuries. After all, people don't do this kind of work on any sizeable scale today, even with current technology. Also, when the stones are cut for these, often miles away, how did they move them up the mountains and hills where they are now? There is something we are missing about all this. I don't go straight to the alien extreme, but they knew something that we don't and I find that pretty compelling.
@Oftin Wong lmfao, the point is you can't cut granite with a fuckin copper or bronze tool. Modern technology cant replicate some of this. So, it doesnt matter how hard you work, how many times you hit these granite stones with a bronze chisel , you ain't gonna form it. Hit it a million times nothing happens.
It honestly looks like the stone carvers were given a ''new'' tool that cut rock like butter, and they went bonkers with it. Slicing and cutting everything they could!!
I've been thinking maybe it's the areas where they experimented on their techniques. Kind of a "school/lab" forum to work in to develop and refine their methods.
Finally. The video I was looking for. Perfect slow detailed video recording. Not short or long. Great music instead of an annoying voice telling us this was done by aliens. I can’t thank you enough. Gracias.
Great video that shines a spotlight on the really interesting aspects of stonework that seems to predate the Incas by far. Advanced mechanical tools made by highly gifted beings are used, but the work appears to be done by far less gifted beings. It almost looks like Stone Age people had access to tools made by a far more advanced civilization. It also appears that this location is used during training in the use of these tools, as a school area.
Wow unbelievable, I've seen 100s of videos on sacsaywuhman and thought I'd seen everything but ur footage showed many areas I have never seen before 👍👏
Very thought provoking… humans love a good mystery and this is definitely a mystery… how did they carve those rocks? What sort of tools did they use? How did they transport the rocks after quarrying? Etc, etc, etc….
How gullible to archeologists think we are? They tell us that stone was cut and shaped with copper chisels and stone hammers. Complex curves and perfectly straight, flat cuts done with chisel, even in the face of obvious machine marks. What an insult!
These presentations always blows my mind. I can only come to two conclusions. They had better tools than we have today, or they knew how to make rock soft again. What do you others think?
@@Simonsiempie I feel the same. What destroyed it all was massive amounts of water that came down from the sky. Massive earthquakes, and volatile volcanos like that of Pompeii.. impacts from meteor showers like those that destroyed the dinosaur's. And perhaps even a collision with another body of land from space that neared earth and smashed into it. Causing a pole shift. Along with sudden flash freezing of animals while they grazed off of vegetation. Like the wooly mammoth.
I've never really brought into the concrete idea but I have to say some of those rocks look like they were marked and shaped whilst the material was soft.......🤔
@Kate worth, concrete will not do..an large surface's as the weight is to much to stay in shape. It must have been a 'surface- plasticity' in order to scrape or flatten the stone.. The repairs in the cracks must have been heated to make this toolmarks we see as leftover from it. But how? :-)
3 ปีที่แล้ว +2
@George Browning I have worked much concrete as well. It’s very obvious that geopolymer has been utilized all over earth and sold as ancient high tech to the imbeciles.
@ geopolymer has been debunked many times. If you pour a mixture with small pebbles in the mix. They will pushed in meeting the mould. The strange thing is the pebbles mostly harder are cut right off with the surface. So it was not poured but natural formations and machined like we do now.
I been doing concrete and masonry for over 20 yrs and in my opinion those stones were softened somehow and in some cases liquefied to remove, form, or lay into place during the quarrying and building of most, if not all of those structures. That's the only way you could get such perfect joints that a razor blade couldn't fit into around those random shaped blocks. It even showed what appeared to be pools or puddles of stone that was left from their process and also what looked like stone slag like what you get from discarded molten metal and pockets of ruptured gas bubbles like in volcanic rock . Also the small statues near the end of the video look to be tooled during the cooling down of the rock just like when you write your named in concrete as it's drying. Whoever did this was way more technologically advanced than we are today, at least in terms of their masonry skills. Amazing.
@@calculator1841 I agree. Assertions like that are short sighted at best. Its a testament to the level of cognative content our so called experts are working with. They are all suffering from the Dunning Kruger effect.
It blows my mind to try to work out what kind of techniques would produce these results ! The rock looks like it was very soft when it was worked and in some places it looks like it was molten and then re-solidified but rock does not melt and re-solidify like metal because it has a crystalline structure. If you heat rock to melting point then let it cool it crumbles and breaks apart, yet there are signs all over those rocks that something was pressed against them while they were in a soft state ! Freeze the video @13:34, take a screenshot and zoom right in to see impossible results in solid granite !
4:55... Wow! The proportions, precision and polishing of these rocks is truly exquisite. Of all the things the ancient astronauts designed and lifted, this is one of my favorites
They were highly advanced when it came to flowing water. I wouldn't be suprised if they ancient hydrolic tools and machines. Some of the marks around some sites with the largest of stones look as though the stone was pressure washed away. All you need to do is look at how address rocks are carved and look at what a water jet(water and sand) can do and then use your imagination. I mean people make water powered hydrolic tattoo machines in jail/prison powered by a sink which requires you to constantly have 1 person pushing a button and other materials most would regard as trash. Also I'm sure giant squids and etc. were much more prevalent. Giant squids have claws and beaks that can gouge lines out of steel ship hulls and are about as hard as diamond. These organic materials would be perfect for making tools where diamonds couldn't be had.
Try a parabolic mirror on dyorite melts it instantly . 3,6,9... All is frequency, resonence, osculation. Let's consider radiant energy and liquid batteries?
@@virtualmoyda7221 see VICTOR SHAUBERGER, MAKES EDISON LOOK LIKE A PUPPY. ALSO SEE HUTCHINSON EFFECT ITS THE 9.11 ON MELTING ANYTHING OR LEVITATING IT THIS IS '*"OLD HAT TECH MYSTERY SCHOOL OR IVY LEAGUE
@@hokeypokey1109 I'm highly familiar with the Hutchinson effect. The rocks that have Hutchinson style fissures looks more like part of the remnants of what destroyed the original structures more so than how they were made in my opinion. As in a massive solar flare or mass coronal ejection that triggered all sorts of electro magnetic anomalies struck the area as well as blowing mass amounts of debris into the planet which also triggered the rapid melting of ice and caused mass amounts of global flooding. Some sort of freak event or weapon went off judging by puma punku and the other megalithic sites in South America. The patterns and nuclear glass found around other megalithic sites also tends to point in this direction as well as the flash frozen mammoth graves.
@@christianvoss8614 seems there was some type of concrete used in different cultures in the past. 👍 Possibly some mixtures unknown to people today that were like a liquid epoxy that when hardened becomes similar to granite or marble.🤔 At least you have asked the question allowing for the possibility to gain knowledge of something perceived by many as impossible🙏
@@christianvoss8614 yes that as well. See hidden formula for marble statues and building facades . Cameron on autodidactic talks about the mudflood and exoteric occulted tech I've discovered relics on a golf course with a mound and unusual similar stone in the surrounding upper levels of the range seems this was a structure from long ago or we are a people with amnesia¿
@@christianvoss8614 Language Watch Edit Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in construction in Ancient Rome. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement. It is durable due to its incorporation of pozzolanic ash, which prevents cracks from spreading. By the middle of the 1st century, the material was used frequently, often brick-faced, although variations in aggregate allowed different arrangements of materials. Further innovative developments in the material, called the concrete revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete dome.[1]
At 1:16, the door jam was made of wood but it's petrified wood too. At 1:23, that's petrified wood and that's wood trim around where the door would have been. I've seen hinge marks and in the UK, they just found out that the center posts that they believed to be marble or cement columns are actually petrified wood. That's definitely frame work. The ancient people were so much more advanced than we give them credit for. Privative people could not have built such intricate structures. At 5:36, triangle framework? Wow! I love this stuff. At 6:12, diamond patterns are awesome. I will be thinking about this for a long time. Crystal formations between the blocks is formed from certain kinds of mortar over thousands of years. There are dams around the US that have steep straight canyon walls that look like they were quarried, just like this. Amazing video. What in the world at 12:04? I've seen that melted spot before and am still puzzled about it. What could melt rock like that and only in specific places? 12:15 Wth? And 12:49? They had to have something to melt rock. At 13:11, I've never seen that character before. Cheshire Cat? Lol. It's melted too. I can't get over it! Thank You for sharing with us. This was better than seeing this place on History Channel. They don't show half of the stuff you did. I think it says something about Jesus at 15:15 it says Jesus on the top line. Has anyone deciphered those panels yet? Cool video.
Several methods of fabrication of the polygonal masonry using clay/gypsum replicas, a topography translator, and reduced clay models of the stone blocks along with a 3D-pantograph are described in the article “Fabrication methods of the polygonal masonry of large tightly-fitted stone blocks with curved surface interfaces in megalithic structures of Peru”. TH-cam does not allow a direct link. Search by the article title.
No. That is pseudoscience formulated by insecure people who are triggered by the idea of ancient people being more advanced than us when it comes to stone fabrication.
Make ya wonder if they had some kind of light saber or something similar?some pretty amazing cutting tools that’s for sure! Definitely some technology that we’re not yet understanding?obviously we don’t have that technology today,definitely something that we are missing here?
I've been to some of these sites, and I remember standing there thinking, "It looks like these folks had knowledge or technology we just don't understand." Some of the huge stones at Sacsayhuaman look like they were melted. Since I nearly failed my freshman geology class, clearly I don't know much about rocks, but I find the question fascinating. Tiwuanaku confuses me as well.
No, they look pounded not melted. I too have seen them. If they had advanced tech, where is it? Why is nothing else advanced? Why did they fight wars with stone axes? People have been working stone in Peru for 3000 years, at least. By 500 years ago, they were really good at it.
@@honeysucklecat Questions are not, in and of themselves, answers or solutions. It's difficult to say what an ancient people may or may not have had. While there are many questions, I doubt we will have any definitive answers. I'm not one of those people who thinks that alien civilizations gave hidden technology to people centuries/millenia ago. But I do know that if you pound on a rock face, it's likely to look quite different from what we see. But I'm also not a geologist, just some person on the internet. 🙃
great photography, let me see for myself . l am a cement and concrete mason , im seeing P-lenty of evidence to suggest a great deal there was viscous , flowing , the cat footage too , very compelling . hoping you dropped a copy of this into Brien Forresters lap ( whos videos i admire and appreciate ..... im sure much work went into this videos production , that said youve all made it look easy , as well demonstrated much that hasnt been so previously detailed . Triple hurrah and thank you.
hope I'm reaching you C , first ever replying to a comment . Thinking of Great Pyrimid of Giza and perhaps the Trilithon of Baalbek and it's accompanyying quarry we can atleast discuss limestone . number one there are a great many variations of grain , density , and meta-morphic compressive strengths . You can find a great deal of 19th century building facades made from a super even , fine- grained " brownstone" which is a true sedimentary stone where upon close inspection you can see the tiny exoskeletal remnants , piesces and even whole bodies but then come the limes that have become metamorphic ! you will see the seeming evidence of crystallization , still in evidence the less occasional shape of a somewhat larger variety of ancient lifeforms ... The "bluestone " chips used widely in concrete quarried and crushed expressly for that purpose are of that metamorphosed type , this stuff is practically speaking almost as dense as granite in say a two inch chip format and banged around with a hammer , will split and or granulate similarily . That said and in wondering as to the large-scale operation it would take to either render quarried stone to the dusts and powders and sands and stones necessary to form a slurryable admix equally boggles my imagination . pyroclastic techniques also come into question as regards the use of igneous materials . l am also a carver of stone and certain stone "bruises" namely marbles( another type of metamorphosed limeestone) if a chisel is held and struck too acutely it will micro-shatter the internal matrix and leave a web of weakness that though undetectable at first might only be in evidence after polishing and certainly upon invested age if left to the scour and penetration of water ....pocks and spalls will develop .. l note this because not all of the suspect voids i see ( as yet only through photos) seem aparent to bruising . but so much of it IS apparently the appearance of not only formed but the very occasional voids left where matter was not vibrated well enough or viscosity wasnt present enough to settle completely before it hardened. concrete is in its final product is a man-made conglomerate , even cement which is all-else but the stone , or grouts ( sanded or unsanded ) still in essence a conglomerate. The Romans knew to create concrete with the widest array of agregate , from sand to even small boulders , all heavily tamped into place to remove air. as a kid locked up in the Commonwealth of Kentucky i was essentially handed a trowel and told to get busy , in the meager library at my last facility i found an interesting late 50s book on Masonry and in it was an absolutely astounding photo of two portside concrete jobs on the coast of Italy . one badly eroded bulwark for end of wharf done by Mussolini's army engineers , the other a 2nd century Roman edifice replete with balustrades and rail still in excellent condition . ill never forget that image. much to say but must get to work. anytime i can add-to , aid or abet ...
I think it makes more sense to say they had their own version of cement or concrete that they shaped before it hardened, which is how they got the shapes and sharp cuts in this material. A recipe that later civilizations didn’t know.
It is just so frustrating to try and think about how those cuts were made. It is almost like someone was making test cuts or learning how to use a lightsaber type tool to make perfect cuts on rock. Some are random cuts in random places and some are perfectly cut symmetrical rocks. I cannot help but to think it is an Alien species from thousands of years before any "modern" human in that area was there, was doing something that they never completed or did not care to complete. I cannot imagine anyone in that area from thousands of years ago using any technology that could make those kinds of cuts. I truly think the first "modern" people in that area did not build or cut those structures. I believe they inherited them, just like the Egyptians inherited the pyramids and the Phoenix. Some day, before I die, I will visit that place and Egypt. I need to see that place with my own two eyes, and touch it. Great and thought provoking video!
Yes it is very frustrating to see what we cannot explain, the marks on that Jaguar bowl look just like the rock was dissolved or vapourised. There are impressions in the surface that look like a hot bar was pressed into it but that is physically impossible to do for a number of reasons. First we don't have any metals that can take that much heat without melting and second when rock is heated to melting it's molecular structure changes so when it cools it becomes very brittle and does not return to it's previous state. The general carving out of the granite sculpture was done with regular stone tools by chipping it away bit by bit but the fine detail around the face and claws was done using an entirely different and unknown method and it looks as though the person making the carving was doing it for the first time and learning the technique. Some areas appear to have had some king of thick liquid dripped on it which ate away at the stone but what we know about granite makes this explanation impossible, the more you look at it the more you see ! I don't like the alien theory because that's too simple and impossible to prove, I believe the people who did this developed the technique through trial and error and meditation under psychoactive substance trance, it has been shown that many unexpected things have been learned using these techniques and the human mind is capable of much more than we realise. At one time this was the normal way to gain information and learning but in modern times it is frowned upon as 'Devil Worship' and 'witchcraft'. The only way to retrieve these technologies would be to use the same psychoactive substances and trances that the ancient people knew about and learned from.
To add more mystery, in ancient Peru only bronze, plate and gold were worked, but that kind of tools cannot carve the rocks like shown in the video ... i just can't imagine how they moved the giant blocks without the use of the wheel
Absolutely fascinating! If it was cast there would be tons of raw casting materials all over the place such as we see with modern day concrete. They seem to randomly saw a piece off of a stone for no reason. It also seems so casual and arbitrary, yet you don’t casually carve an edge off a boulder like it’s an easy task. The sculpture looks like modern day welding penetrations. I’m a contractor and we have these large 3 foot diameter saws for cutting concrete and masonry and that’s what these cuts look like but they did this in ancient times! Simply amazing.
On a planet 4.5 billion years old, is it not extremely arrogant to think everything has only happened in the last 20,000 years. I am sure great civilizations have come and gone. And I am not convinced that they were all "human"
Modern humans invented 500 genders. There is no way beings smart enough to perform task we incellectuals can't replicate today ever existed. Now stop thinking and be dumb you are out of line.
I agree totally.. i think its a bit crazy to think man kind is the only intelligent beings to be here within the last idk 100% of time like everybody we known and studied is less than 5% of earths history imagine that
@@4TroneOfficial @TrashPanda is pointing out that those in power wish us to be dumb and follow everything they say and that we shouldn’t question their knowledge
Yep I totally agree….as it’s been stated by others before that the ancient civilisations were very advanced but in ways us humans can’t fathom….as we need science, sense and proof that unfathomable things can exist. What we don’t understand, we will fear! And with fear we cause death
Nobody has ever shown this much in detail eith these videos! I've been watching documentaries for at least 10 years and it is now pretty obvious they were capable of melting stone. That last stone looks like it was melted into place and written on
that looks like soft rock it can easily can be carved with axe or chisel i have seen the same stone work in midas city turkey which was worked on soft rock .the real mystery is the granite in egypt
Incredible how the stones interlock and how whoever did it manage it 🤯. I just hope one day in my life time we discover how it was done! Brilliant stuff love it 👍🏼
To my eye some of the piles of stone/rock look like the slag that comes out of iron smelters. On others that have been formed you can see the where they are going to make the cut. Great video. More thoughts and questions than answers. My view is that these ruins go back anything up to 100 thousand years and were destroyed by the makers with some kind of unknown energy source. Q:- but why?
Если бы у нас была возможность своими глазами увидеть то, как создавались эти объекты, мы бы увидели что-то, что не описано в известной нам истории. По сути, мы почти ничего не знаем о прошлых цивилизациях.
3:11 that is definately scorched / Melted rock, what on earth has done that then. The saw cuts the jigsaw impression is just mind blowing. Cool soundtrack as well.👍
As an artist myself I can recognize in some of the rocks that they were used as sketchbooks and you can notice those stone builders were testing the tools and the advanced technology at disposal. If only we could know this technology...we can only imagine the wonderful machines, tools and technology of the ancient stone builders.
Hey man, just wondering if you can point me to a timestamp of one of these testing rocks. I don't have an artists eye, but I'm curious if we can narrow down our speculation on what form these tools took. Thanks
@@askmeaboutfreewill5791 I’m not so sure I see the artistry either but the idea they were testing their tools at some of these locations bring a whole new to why so many of these seem random with no purpose; like why carve into the side of a mountain or giant stones with no intended purpose?
Like I mentioned in another comment, looks very "clay" like as though after a deluvial flood and sedimentary rock is laid down, would it take time to harden?
My thing is we are looking at this with 12,000 years of weathering & still there's right angels & sharp edges. When this was done it must of been pristine, like straight off the manufacturing line & don't forget this stone is granite, around the same hardness as steel.
@@emanjam45 It's called the flood of the bible . There are countless indicators as to how deep the deposits left behind were all over the world !....It also lines up perfectly with Occam's Razor
@@ggzz6862 there are three types of stones ..... Metamorphic igneous and sedimentary. Every stone that was left over by the flood would come under the category of sedimentary that has nothing to do with the types of stones we are talking about.... what you need to do is go back to the first grade and start over again because you do not have an education
@@clarencehawkins9503 the parallel wasn't the most appropriate as if television can enlighten someone...And yes when I wach tv I feel a bit stupider , because I know they are speaking crap- especially CNN -therfore TV would not be of use for any medieval man, I would recommend him to read some books !
when you consider lightning the massive flow of electrons under high voltage and consider tesla (who created our entire elect grid) theorized it could be harnessed at certain frequencies. It may stand to reason a previous civilization with a similar genius harnessed the earth. could summon forth energy and understood earths frequencies. the natives report the stone was softened. the stone looks like it worked like clay, easily. too bad stone can't be dated....
Our technologies are not that sophisticated unless we can replicate those impossibles of the ancients. Awesome filming of the works of the ancients. Thanks.
I travelled to Peru a few years ago and knee a lot of this sites personaly. Sometimes the stones seens cutted with laser, Sometimes it seens mellted in the place! Impossible to copy today with our modern machines.
When I carve a styrofoam block with a heated loop of wire, it makes scooped shapes in the material, allowing me to lift out a certain volume of the foam. The shapes made in the foam block are some similar to some of the shapes here, seemingly scooped out of stone.
but some lines on the puma claws are very straight, but at the same time also looks like melted. it looks like they used the tool for cutting the stone, to carve the litlle puma. was the stone melting like styrofoam?
I agree, I've thought about that as well. I have a theory --- I think some of these sites were classrooms -- students being taught how to use the ancient tools and perfect the techniques. That's why I think you see some of those obvious little protrusions on some of the stones in walls, but not others. They stuck some kind of melting device into the stone, made the stone like a bread of dough, but the timing had to be just right to pull the device back out again and the younger more inexperienced workers were left with the pull out marks. Other stones you see some square indentations -- this is because the stone was sagging -- maybe because the devise was withdrawn too fast and they pushed the stone back up into place with pieces of wood. Just a theory
It looks like they were testing their power tools on these rocks. Like when you have some new machine and want to know what can you be able to do with it. It looks like they were having fun cutting extremely hard andesite
Some of the stones look like damage done by electrical discharge experiments done by the Thunderbolts Project in a laboratory recommended you check them out also. I definitely believe they are way older than we are being told.
i like this music .. ..i been watching your documentaries over 2 years ..keep it up.continue with further new findings in ancient archeology. thank you .
So megalithic era was actually when human using ancient advanced technology during and before the last ice age, and this technology couldn’t be passed down to the next generation because of the great floods and other cataclysmic events, makes sense
Buena video muy buena filmación a los cortes y figuras en las piedras todo filmado con mucha precisión y mucha calma muy profesional de lo mejor que he visto gracias sigan así sin ocultar nada
Interesting pictures of rocks, a commentary about what we’re looking at and why would have been helpful in explaining everything. Nevertheless, we have been given the opportunity to see stoneworks not seen in the usual videos.
I will never cease to be amazed at the crazy stuff people are willing to believe to avoid questioning the official story. Marshmallow rocks, cutting rock with concentrated sunlight, acid mud? How is that more easy to believe than ancient civilizations? Is it an ego thing?
@@RickaramaTrama-lc1ys I really do believe it is ego. I think people couldn't handle the idea that older civilizations were more advanced and that we're deteriorating, not just morally but technologically. So much for evolution, which runs contrary to the idea that we're farther from perfection than when we started.
I see the same: a flat 3mm blade, a curved blade, and rods. Assuming they had the tools, I can't imagine how these were adjustable tools of varying size and why there isn't slag everywhere.
It was done with machines and technology that we cannot replicate at this time. Anyone telling you it was chisels, hammers etc are lying. The quartz embedded in the stone at 14:26 looks like alphabet letters we use today. Apparently it was made in a way that would be difficult to destroy. Meaning something wanted it to be visible for all time.
It's amazing how people react to this subject, as if they were scared of it. Just like bullies at school, ridiculing the kid they don't understand because it's easier that way, and the rest of the sheep are guaranteed to follow, making you feel powerful when the reality is that you are weak, just like your arguments. This kind of work is absolutley amazing, and it doesn't matter how many hundreds of years you keep repeating yourself that it has been done by primitives with stone and copper tools, it simply isn't possible. We don't know how it was done, because it's not in the archeological records, the Incas couldn't have done it, unless they had some secret technology that hasn't survived with the rest of their heritage. I personally don't deal in speculation, I much rather work with what we have, and what we have is tool marks, tons and tons of tool marks, that to anyone with some experience in the field are an absolute mind fuck, and the day we decide that this subject is worth investigating, as it is, they will provide a solid base for a real study. Now, all you "learned professionals" can keep laughing or pulling your hair thinking we all believe aliens did, a theory I'm not particularly fond of, but not any more preposterous than the one involving stone axes and copper chisels, but the truth won't change, truth being we have no idea how, or who, did it. History is not set in stone (no pun intended), it's simply pieced toghter by normal people using what little evidence is left, with a lot of assumptions in it, and more often than not with a lot of bias, and the world is old enough and suffered so many huge changes and cataclisms to have potentially erased many civilizations over and over, plus, we are not looking for traces of lost civilisations, and we are so scared of the subject that even if we found something we would most certainly explain it away. For some people the idea that everything is explained and our history is uniform, a straight line of evolution from primitives to modern humanity, is reassuring, it takes away the fear of the unknown, that tomorrow we could be blown off the ground by an asteroid or a couple of mount Saint Helen's events. Acknowledging that a civilisation with advanced science, one we can't fully wrap our heads around, existed before our own, is a direct attack to their world view, which stand fragile over its weak foundations, a view based on belief, not proof, hidden behind a facade of pseudo-skepticism, which like anybody they're entitled to, what they are not entitled to on the other hand, is forcing the rest of the world to their belief system, bullying their way from schools to universities, pretending to be recognized as authorities on a subject they know nothing about. Fortunately for the rest of us things are slowly changing, and maybe in one or two generations time we will see a dramatic change of paradigm, and finally we will be truly investigating the real mysteries of our past.
Greetings from beautiful Esquimalt, BC Canada! At 77 and a 65 yrs student of history, I concur with everything you've written, so I won't repeat any of it, except to say that your reasoning is 100% sound. Many people, when they cannot come up with an explanation, would rather stand back and say almost anything, except that they don't know and must wait for an explanation. What's worse, some of them makeup incredible fictions & fables, as if make-believe is a basis for belief and action!
@Nick Sothep I can't say for sure how they did it but as someone with over 20 yrs experience in concrete and stone masonry, I see extreme similarities between this stone and what concrete looks like when it is tooled and formed as it is drying. They showed examples of what looked like puddles of hardened stone, perfect joints in the blocks, and stone slag with apparent ruptured gas bubbles, similar to volcanic rock. So as I said, I do not know for certain how they accomplished these wonders of construction but if I had to make an educated guess, I would have to say that in every example shown, it appears that they somehow knew how to heat up the rock or somehow turn it into a malleable consistency to shape and lay it while building.
I actually like the lack of narration...just filming some of the more random (but mind blowing) things that other videos do not show. I feel like I am actually walking around there ...
It is obvious that they had the ability to manipulate and shape any type of stone, any way they wanted as if it was once soft and lightweight. Seems like it had to have been heat treated or chemically treated. Those paracas skulls had to have been associated with these structures and since they are a different species, the question becomes not who or how they built them, but where did these people come from and why are they now gone? Their species/genetic code appeared to have been unfavorable and selected for extinction by either nature, or something else.
Not only stone processing, the pre Incas civilization like Chavin, Tiawanaku, Wari, Nasca, Mochica, etc (search Chavin de Huantar palace, Kalasasaya temple, Fortaleza de Wari) were already using stones to make their temples, roads and other artefacts in very advanced techniques as minerals like gold, silver, copper but the most important these civilizations didn't left contaminated rivers, forest or sea like we do in nowadays.
Question! How do stone artifacts that are “15,000 years older” than these sites and rolling around in soil appear to be in better conditions than these extremely weathered stones?
There was a great video last week on giant stones in a wall in Russia, was overlooked by the local people who were used to it.. Thanks very interesting footage..☯️👌
15:48 Helplessly watching on an ancient writing of completely unknown civilization. Who they were? How powerful they were given those mind blowing stone softening techniques? What other realms they mastered? It really freaks me out.
@Oftin Wong Too bad for Inca empire, they were really underdeveloped. However, my thoughts are about the first ones who built those megalithic marvels.
@Oftin Wong I'm not proving anything, just observing facts. And since you mentioned it, I'm considering geopolymer concrete theory as well. What I'm certain, those were not Incas.
@Oftin Wong So, man made rock is not a choice either. Interesting. Are you suggesting that the megaliths were carved by Incas with some primitive bronze/copper tools? Letting alone perfect drill holes and traces everywhere of "molten" rocks.
@Oftin Wong I don't say they were stupid and incapable, just pointed out their level of development acknowledged by mainstream archaeology. And why do you put into the same basket hand made axe heads and anomalies like perfectly drilled holes, circular saw marks, molten stone, and much more... Let alone the sheer size of these blocks. You don't have answers. Take some time to see the difference what Incas really built and what they found when first came there.
@Oftin Wong Molten rock is the way to describe how it looks now, all the rest is just your fantasy. Anyway, your point is quite clear, the megaliths of hard stone were carved and polished by primitive societies (including "molten" rock, circular saw, and core drill anomalies randomly applied everywhere), they've just spent enough time to wear down those rocks with no clear reason why would they waste themselves on such difficult projects. And with these claims you feel reconciled? Obviously, you don't really comprehend the amount of work required to wear down a granite or basalt megalith and apply above mentioned anomalies. I'm not ready to tell who exactly built those sites and which techniques they used (although the timing of at least 12000 year ago seems more and more plausible with new discoveries popping up here and there), but I'll not accept barren claims of mainstream archaeology that go against the common sense.
If currently there was a mass extinction on earth do you think it would be possible for future generations that survived thousands of years from now to relearn all of our science and technology such as laser surgery, the space shuttle, etc ? I don't think so. So I think it stands to reason that our ancient ancestors were far smarter than we give them credit for and this amazing stone work that they left behind is most likely a tiny portion of what they were capable of doing.
Melting Granite melts at temperatures between 1215-1260 °C (2219-2300 °F) when dry, but the melting point decreases to 650 °C when water is present. Molding Once melted, granite can be poured into molds and cooled. The casting can then be reheated in a furnace to crystallize it and give it the appearance of natural granite. The time and temperature required for this process depends on the desired grain and crystalline structure, as well as the size of the casting.
Paul cook has a Chanel and a stone mason melted the rock with a mystery acid solution and it went to dust. He then added water and it went into a cement-like paste.. There are Egyptian hyroglith that show the same process. @@CARPB147
@@rajbalar9207 Paul Cook has a Chanel where he shows that it's possible to "fry" stone in to Powder with a mysterious acid that makes it into a powder like substance... Then liquid is mixed with it again and it then sets to hard stone
Thats true for glasses but most stones, in this case granite, can't be melted and reformed. In granites case it will vitrify and turn into glass if heated. That is why these structures are enigmatic.
Need help with voice acting
i can help (yo puedo ayudar)
Me too
I would be elated to do voicework.
It needs no commentary. The absence of commentary makes it visually transfixing.
We do not need to have the wonder verbally pointed out to us.
We do not need our attention or our thoughts directed.
Leave it as it is. Let the viewer's own wonder and imagination take them over.
Couldn't agree more with last reply from banned from commenting; can only... the ambient music also goes with the video with no commentary
So wonderful to see these works in stone without having to listen to opinions on how they got there. Thank you very much.
It makes my mind race just to see them.
It must have been something to live in those times.
The true story of human history is unquestionably far stranger than any of us can possibly imagine.
The force is strong with you o,b,1
Actually, not as strange as the one they want us to believe. Checkout Sumer.
You deserve 1k likes.
Aliens dude.. freaking aliens!!
Much more like Lord of the rings.
The best sounds I've heard on TH-cam in 6 months of watching 3 to 6 hours daily 7 days each week. It's amazing how it looks like these cuts were made with high-temperature blades. Some of the stuff later in the video looks like it was created by a plasma torch that melted grooves and holes. It's also amazing how religious people think they understand anything here at all. I really appreciate the lack of narration, just the visuals is what it's all about.
Microscopically the surfaces do look molten, I feel like plasma is the only way to get such high temps concentrated and controlled. However, the ‘nubs’ on the polygonal masonry looks like injection spots
I really like that this video has no commentaries and is not trying to propose any stupid conspiracy theories. Just pure evidence, think what you want.
Yes it is kind of refreshing. And now here comes the commentary : anyone who thinks that anyone else could cut those curved sections out of solid rock with Machine Tools, (even today!) has got to have rocks in their head
@@grantperkins368 ⁰⁰p¹p 1⁰⁰
It's not about conspiracy theory, is more like, rejecting any hypothesis by the (oficcially established )historyans, I mean any theory that takes them out of their comfort zone .
The polygon walls always leave me dumbfounded. How did they move, shape, and place those stones into a wall? Simply amazing.
@George Browning Definitely.
@George Browning my point exactly, this explains the distance of moving things
No commentary but you make up for it in the quality and what you are filming. Just amazing best video i have ever seen on TH-cam. More please.
Á anos pesquiso material na internet sobre as pedras cortadas dos sitios arqueológigicos sul americanos, e nunca tinha visto um trabalho de captação de imagens tão minuncioso q nem esse! Meus parabéns mesmo aos cinegrafistas e pesquisadores pelo belo trabajo
The most amazing thing about the world-wide existence of "ancient" mind-boggling stonework, is the scientific community's refusal to acknowledge its existence.
The scientific community are here to control the information!!!
I think the existence of the stonework is more mind boggling than some scientists not acknowledging its existence 😂 goofy ahhhhhhhhh !!!
Probably the most amazing video on this topic on youtube. Thank you!
In seen many videos on this subject, but this video just increased the astonishing level of awareness for me. This is incredible.
The best video on the exact capabilities of the ancients that I've ever seen.
Scientists cannot understand how these ancients could have performed this with the tools they had at their disposal. It would be difficult today with our modern machines. This is not only here in Peru, these ancient techniques have been done world wide. Some of the rocks are as hard as diamonds.
Then, it is more accurate to suggest - the 'primitive tools of early man' theory is totally without accuracy or reason. What happened to these real tools then? They were used, used & recycled constantly until societal changes or catastrophe changed the direction of things.
There is NO rock as hard as a diamond.
Today's scientists also tell us that we are responsible for the warming of the atmosphere.
@@tonyheaden9263
But there are rocks like this that would REQUIRE diamond tip tools.
who else finds this highly compelling?
It looks like they cut through it with a hot butter knife.
@Oftin Wong Hard work and persistence is vital when working stone. But what do you use to cut and shape Basalt when the hardest material (assumed) to have existed at that time was copper? Maybe there was some technology or process that has been lost to us through the centuries. After all, people don't do this kind of work on any sizeable scale today, even with current technology. Also, when the stones are cut for these, often miles away, how did they move them up the mountains and hills where they are now?
There is something we are missing about all this. I don't go straight to the alien extreme, but they knew something that we don't and I find that pretty compelling.
Here
@Oftin Wong lmfao, the point is you can't cut granite with a fuckin copper or bronze tool. Modern technology cant replicate some of this. So, it doesnt matter how hard you work, how many times you hit these granite stones with a bronze chisel , you ain't gonna form it. Hit it a million times nothing happens.
@Oftin Wong lmfao who said aliens?? Beonze tools is what mainstream says. You can't carve granite with bronze tools.
Excellent video! Some incredible skills demonstrated. Best regards and blessings.
It honestly looks like the stone carvers were given a ''new'' tool that cut rock like butter, and they went bonkers with it. Slicing and cutting everything they could!!
Yes you are absolutely right. Most of these carvings don't make sense. What the hack happened and why?
I've been thinking maybe it's the areas where they experimented on their techniques. Kind of a "school/lab" forum to work in to develop and refine their methods.
@@rasputinsliver9092 Either that or they were laughing hysterically while they made things they knew would have us trying to make sense of it.
Indeed, it must have been very easy to do..
@@ThomiX0.0 I've often thought however they carved the stones, for whatever reason it must have been relatively easy for them.
Finally. The video I was looking for. Perfect slow detailed video recording. Not short or long. Great music instead of an annoying voice telling us this was done by aliens. I can’t thank you enough. Gracias.
Great video that shines a spotlight on the really interesting aspects of stonework that seems to predate the Incas by far. Advanced mechanical tools made by highly gifted beings are used, but the work appears to be done by far less gifted beings. It almost looks like Stone Age people had access to tools made by a far more advanced civilization. It also appears that this location is used during training in the use of these tools, as a school area.
Wow unbelievable, I've seen 100s of videos on sacsaywuhman and thought I'd seen everything but ur footage showed many areas I have never seen before 👍👏
Thx...appreciate your attention to details usually overlooked by other presenters
This is by far the best evidence of obviously cutting of granite I've ever seen! 💯 PERCENT LIGET
Very thought provoking… humans love a good mystery and this is definitely a mystery… how did they carve those rocks? What sort of tools did they use? How did they transport the rocks after quarrying? Etc, etc, etc….
It's non linear in nature something that challenges our logic
How gullible to archeologists think we are? They tell us that stone was cut and shaped with copper chisels and stone hammers. Complex curves and perfectly straight, flat cuts done with chisel, even in the face of obvious machine marks. What an insult!
not carved, CAST, with geopolymer concrete
@@aaaexcavatorsvietnam1128 A lot of it is granite and other natural stone.
A wonderful video showing what was done instead of trying to explain how they did it, what they don't know how.
Excellent production, making it's point without speaking a word
These presentations always blows my mind. I can only come to two conclusions.
They had better tools than we have today, or they knew how to make rock soft again. What do you others think?
c. all of the above
And what destroyed it all?...
I guess time distroys everything in the end. And the earthquakes that came with it.
@@Simonsiempie I feel the same. What destroyed it all was massive amounts of water that came down from the sky. Massive earthquakes, and volatile volcanos like that of Pompeii.. impacts from meteor showers like those that destroyed the dinosaur's. And perhaps even a collision with another body of land from space that neared earth and smashed into it. Causing a pole shift. Along with sudden flash freezing of animals while they grazed off of vegetation. Like the wooly mammoth.
@@Simonsiempie the younger dryas cataclysm
I've never really brought into the concrete idea but I have to say some of those rocks look like they were marked and shaped whilst the material was soft.......🤔
Well spotted young lady.... keep on the path.
Ditto, let's figure this out
@Kate worth, concrete will not do..an large surface's as the weight is to much to stay in shape.
It must have been a 'surface- plasticity' in order to scrape or flatten the stone..
The repairs in the cracks must have been heated to make this toolmarks we see as leftover from it.
But how? :-)
@George Browning I have worked much concrete as well. It’s very obvious that geopolymer has been utilized all over earth and sold as ancient high tech to the imbeciles.
@ geopolymer has been debunked many times. If you pour a mixture with small pebbles in the mix. They will pushed in meeting the mould. The strange thing is the pebbles mostly harder are cut right off with the surface. So it was not poured but natural formations and machined like we do now.
I been doing concrete and masonry for over 20 yrs and in my opinion those stones were softened somehow and in some cases liquefied to remove, form, or lay into place during the quarrying and building of most, if not all of those structures. That's the only way you could get such perfect joints that a razor blade couldn't fit into around those random shaped blocks. It even showed what appeared to be pools or puddles of stone that was left from their process and also what looked like stone slag like what you get from discarded molten metal and pockets of ruptured gas bubbles like in volcanic rock . Also the small statues near the end of the video look to be tooled during the cooling down of the rock just like when you write your named in concrete as it's drying. Whoever did this was way more technologically advanced than we are today, at least in terms of their masonry skills. Amazing.
I laugh when I hear someone say the ancients used copper tools to cut marble and granite.
@@calculator1841 I agree. Assertions like that are short sighted at best. Its a testament to the level of cognative content our so called experts are working with. They are all suffering from the Dunning Kruger effect.
It blows my mind to try to work out what kind of techniques would produce these results !
The rock looks like it was very soft when it was worked and in some places it looks like it was molten and then re-solidified but rock does not melt and re-solidify like metal because it has a crystalline structure. If you heat rock to melting point then let it cool it crumbles and breaks apart, yet there are signs all over those rocks that something was pressed against them while they were in a soft state !
Freeze the video @13:34, take a screenshot and zoom right in to see impossible results in solid granite !
4:55... Wow! The proportions, precision and polishing of these rocks is truly exquisite. Of all the things the ancient astronauts designed and lifted, this is one of my favorites
Thanks very much for this video. Great footage.
It looks like they could elasticize stone and in places it looks like they could precisely melt and weld stone.
They were highly advanced when it came to flowing water. I wouldn't be suprised if they ancient hydrolic tools and machines. Some of the marks around some sites with the largest of stones look as though the stone was pressure washed away. All you need to do is look at how address rocks are carved and look at what a water jet(water and sand) can do and then use your imagination. I mean people make water powered hydrolic tattoo machines in jail/prison powered by a sink which requires you to constantly have 1 person pushing a button and other materials most would regard as trash. Also I'm sure giant squids and etc. were much more prevalent. Giant squids have claws and beaks that can gouge lines out of steel ship hulls and are about as hard as diamond. These organic materials would be perfect for making tools where diamonds couldn't be had.
Try a parabolic mirror on dyorite melts it instantly . 3,6,9... All is frequency, resonence, osculation. Let's consider radiant energy and liquid batteries?
@@virtualmoyda7221 see VICTOR SHAUBERGER,
MAKES EDISON LOOK LIKE A PUPPY. ALSO SEE HUTCHINSON EFFECT ITS THE 9.11 ON MELTING ANYTHING OR LEVITATING IT THIS IS '*"OLD HAT TECH MYSTERY SCHOOL OR IVY LEAGUE
@@hokeypokey1109 I'm highly familiar with the Hutchinson effect. The rocks that have Hutchinson style fissures looks more like part of the remnants of what destroyed the original structures more so than how they were made in my opinion. As in a massive solar flare or mass coronal ejection that triggered all sorts of electro magnetic anomalies struck the area as well as blowing mass amounts of debris into the planet which also triggered the rapid melting of ice and caused mass amounts of global flooding. Some sort of freak event or weapon went off judging by puma punku and the other megalithic sites in South America. The patterns and nuclear glass found around other megalithic sites also tends to point in this direction as well as the flash frozen mammoth graves.
Tom Jeffries. Unbelievable naieve fantasies about malleable stone. All the stone was cut. It is as simple as that.
I am an old stone mason, seen many works, these included...there’s no logical explanation. Very nicely presented here 👍🏾👍🏽👍🏻. 🙏🏽🌏✌🏽
Can it be concrete?
@@christianvoss8614 seems there was some type of concrete used in different cultures in the past. 👍 Possibly some mixtures unknown to people today that were like a liquid epoxy that when hardened becomes similar to granite or marble.🤔 At least you have asked the question allowing for the possibility to gain knowledge of something perceived by many as impossible🙏
Hiram abiff
@@christianvoss8614 yes that as well. See hidden formula for marble statues and building facades . Cameron on autodidactic talks about the mudflood and exoteric occulted tech I've discovered relics on a golf course with a mound and unusual similar stone in the surrounding upper levels of the range seems this was a structure from long ago or we are a people with amnesia¿
@@christianvoss8614 Language
Watch
Edit
Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in construction in Ancient Rome. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement. It is durable due to its incorporation of pozzolanic ash, which prevents cracks from spreading. By the middle of the 1st century, the material was used frequently, often brick-faced, although variations in aggregate allowed different arrangements of materials. Further innovative developments in the material, called the concrete revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete dome.[1]
At 1:16, the door jam was made of wood but it's petrified wood too. At 1:23, that's petrified wood and that's wood trim around where the door would have been. I've seen hinge marks and in the UK, they just found out that the center posts that they believed to be marble or cement columns are actually petrified wood. That's definitely frame work. The ancient people were so much more advanced than we give them credit for. Privative people could not have built such intricate structures. At 5:36, triangle framework? Wow! I love this stuff. At 6:12, diamond patterns are awesome. I will be thinking about this for a long time. Crystal formations between the blocks is formed from certain kinds of mortar over thousands of years. There are dams around the US that have steep straight canyon walls that look like they were quarried, just like this. Amazing video. What in the world at 12:04? I've seen that melted spot before and am still puzzled about it. What could melt rock like that and only in specific places? 12:15 Wth? And 12:49? They had to have something to melt rock. At 13:11, I've never seen that character before. Cheshire Cat? Lol. It's melted too. I can't get over it! Thank You for sharing with us. This was better than seeing this place on History Channel. They don't show half of the stuff you did. I think it says something about Jesus at 15:15 it says Jesus on the top line. Has anyone deciphered those panels yet? Cool video.
I've rewatched this video a few times over the last year or so. Such a great collection of extraordinary stonework
Several methods of fabrication of the polygonal masonry using clay/gypsum replicas, a topography translator, and reduced clay models of the stone blocks along with a 3D-pantograph are described in the article “Fabrication methods of the polygonal masonry of large tightly-fitted stone blocks with curved surface interfaces in megalithic structures of Peru”. TH-cam does not allow a direct link. Search by the article title.
No. That is pseudoscience formulated by insecure people who are triggered by the idea of ancient people being more advanced than us when it comes to stone fabrication.
@@joes.2111 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 where in the fudge did you get that from a science article, my man 😂
The 8th article edition (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0087.v8) is posted at Preprints. Search the article by DOI or by title.
Very good, some new tool markings shown in this video. Clearly evidences of different tools like lens heat, acid and circular saw, maybe combined.
Make ya wonder if they had some kind of light saber or something similar?some pretty amazing cutting tools that’s for sure! Definitely some technology that we’re not yet understanding?obviously we don’t have that technology today,definitely something that we are missing here?
@@raymondomit6257 Look at the elongated skulls & hybrids. We are missing the alien connections.
... some of these are new to me. Wow, absolutely incredibly beautiful. I am fascinated. Utterly. I need to know
Another opinion: the music is nice!
Thanks btw for showing your footage. No commentary is a welcomed change as well
I've been to some of these sites, and I remember standing there thinking, "It looks like these folks had knowledge or technology we just don't understand." Some of the huge stones at Sacsayhuaman look like they were melted. Since I nearly failed my freshman geology class, clearly I don't know much about rocks, but I find the question fascinating. Tiwuanaku confuses me as well.
No, they look pounded not melted. I too have seen them.
If they had advanced tech, where is it? Why is nothing else advanced? Why did they fight wars with stone axes? People have been working stone in Peru for 3000 years, at least. By 500 years ago, they were really good at it.
@@honeysucklecat Questions are not, in and of themselves, answers or solutions. It's difficult to say what an ancient people may or may not have had. While there are many questions, I doubt we will have any definitive answers.
I'm not one of those people who thinks that alien civilizations gave hidden technology to people centuries/millenia ago. But I do know that if you pound on a rock face, it's likely to look quite different from what we see. But I'm also not a geologist, just some person on the internet. 🙃
Truly we need more videos like this. Just focusing on showing the subject, lingering on closeups of some of these.
great photography, let me see for myself . l am a cement and concrete mason , im seeing P-lenty of evidence to suggest a great deal there was viscous , flowing , the cat footage too , very compelling . hoping you dropped a copy of this into Brien Forresters lap ( whos videos i admire and appreciate ..... im sure much work went into this videos production , that said youve all made it look easy , as well demonstrated much that hasnt been so previously detailed . Triple hurrah and thank you.
hope I'm reaching you C , first ever replying to a comment . Thinking of Great Pyrimid of Giza and perhaps the Trilithon of Baalbek and it's accompanyying quarry we can atleast discuss limestone .
number one there are a great many variations of grain , density , and meta-morphic compressive strengths . You can find a great deal of 19th century building facades made from a super even , fine- grained " brownstone" which is a true sedimentary stone where upon close inspection you can see the tiny exoskeletal remnants , piesces and even whole bodies but then come the limes that have become metamorphic ! you will see the seeming evidence of crystallization , still in evidence the less occasional shape of a somewhat larger variety of ancient lifeforms ...
The "bluestone " chips used widely in concrete quarried and crushed expressly for that purpose are of that metamorphosed type , this stuff is practically speaking almost as dense as granite in say a two inch chip format and banged around with a hammer , will split and or granulate similarily .
That said and in wondering as to the large-scale operation it would take to either render quarried stone to the dusts and powders and sands and stones necessary to form a slurryable admix equally boggles my imagination . pyroclastic techniques also come into question as regards the use of igneous materials .
l am also a carver of stone and certain stone "bruises" namely marbles( another type of metamorphosed limeestone) if a chisel is held and struck too acutely it will micro-shatter the internal matrix and leave a web of weakness that though undetectable at first might only be in evidence after polishing and certainly upon invested age if left to the scour and penetration of water ....pocks and spalls will develop .. l note this because not all of the suspect voids i see ( as yet only through photos) seem aparent to bruising . but so much of it IS apparently the appearance of not only formed but the very occasional voids left where matter was not vibrated well enough or viscosity wasnt present enough to settle completely before it hardened.
concrete is in its final product is a man-made conglomerate , even cement which is all-else but the stone , or grouts ( sanded or unsanded ) still in essence a conglomerate.
The Romans knew to create concrete with the widest array of agregate , from sand to even small boulders , all heavily tamped into place to remove air.
as a kid locked up in the Commonwealth of Kentucky i was essentially handed a trowel and told to get busy , in the meager library at my last facility i found an interesting late 50s book on Masonry and in it was an absolutely astounding photo of two portside concrete jobs on the coast of Italy . one badly eroded bulwark for end of wharf done by Mussolini's army engineers , the other a 2nd century Roman edifice replete with balustrades and rail still in excellent condition . ill never forget that image. much to say but must get to work.
anytime i can add-to , aid or abet ...
Your mason history does not apply to this !
Just so you know
I think it makes more sense to say they had their own version of cement or concrete that they shaped before it hardened, which is how they got the shapes and sharp cuts in this material. A recipe that later civilizations didn’t know.
Absolute proof of ancient high tech. Insane stuff!!
Great video. If every Brien Forester video wasn’t enough here you go.
It is just so frustrating to try and think about how those cuts were made. It is almost like someone was making test cuts or learning how to use a lightsaber type tool to make perfect cuts on rock. Some are random cuts in random places and some are perfectly cut symmetrical rocks. I cannot help but to think it is an Alien species from thousands of years before any "modern" human in that area was there, was doing something that they never completed or did not care to complete.
I cannot imagine anyone in that area from thousands of years ago using any technology that could make those kinds of cuts. I truly think the first "modern" people in that area did not build or cut those structures. I believe they inherited them, just like the Egyptians inherited the pyramids and the Phoenix.
Some day, before I die, I will visit that place and Egypt. I need to see that place with my own two eyes, and touch it. Great and thought provoking video!
Yes it is very frustrating to see what we cannot explain, the marks on that Jaguar bowl look just like the rock was dissolved or vapourised. There are impressions in the surface that look like a hot bar was pressed into it but that is physically impossible to do for a number of reasons. First we don't have any metals that can take that much heat without melting and second when rock is heated to melting it's molecular structure changes so when it cools it becomes very brittle and does not return to it's previous state.
The general carving out of the granite sculpture was done with regular stone tools by chipping it away bit by bit but the fine detail around the face and claws was done using an entirely different and unknown method and it looks as though the person making the carving was doing it for the first time and learning the technique. Some areas appear to have had some king of thick liquid dripped on it which ate away at the stone but what we know about granite makes this explanation impossible, the more you look at it the more you see !
I don't like the alien theory because that's too simple and impossible to prove, I believe the people who did this developed the technique through trial and error and meditation under psychoactive substance trance, it has been shown that many unexpected things have been learned using these techniques and the human mind is capable of much more than we realise. At one time this was the normal way to gain information and learning but in modern times it is frowned upon as 'Devil Worship' and 'witchcraft'. The only way to retrieve these technologies would be to use the same psychoactive substances and trances that the ancient people knew about and learned from.
To add more mystery, in ancient Peru only bronze, plate and gold were worked, but that kind of tools cannot carve the rocks like shown in the video ... i just can't imagine how they moved the giant blocks without the use of the wheel
this has to be way old 50,000 yrs old . probably twice that. half that floor is gone. its incredibly old. amazing. thank you
Lol
👍
Absolutely fascinating! If it was cast there would be tons of raw casting materials all over the place such as we see with modern day concrete. They seem to randomly saw a piece off of a stone for no reason. It also seems so casual and arbitrary, yet you don’t casually carve an edge off a boulder like it’s an easy task. The sculpture looks like modern day welding penetrations. I’m a contractor and we have these large 3 foot diameter saws for cutting concrete and masonry and that’s what these cuts look like but they did this in ancient times! Simply amazing.
On a planet 4.5 billion years old, is it not extremely arrogant to think everything has only happened in the last 20,000 years. I am sure great civilizations have come and gone. And I am not convinced that they were all "human"
Modern humans invented 500 genders. There is no way beings smart enough to perform task we incellectuals can't replicate today ever existed. Now stop thinking and be dumb you are out of line.
@@trashpanda7859 Bro I have no what idea wht u tryna say
I agree totally..
i think its a bit crazy to think man kind is the only intelligent beings to be here within the last idk 100% of time
like
everybody we known and studied is less than 5% of earths history imagine that
@@4TroneOfficial @TrashPanda is pointing out that those in power wish us to be dumb and follow everything they say and that we shouldn’t question their knowledge
Yep I totally agree….as it’s been stated by others before that the ancient civilisations were very advanced but in ways us humans can’t fathom….as we need science, sense and proof that unfathomable things can exist. What we don’t understand, we will fear! And with fear we cause death
Nobody has ever shown this much in detail eith these videos! I've been watching documentaries for at least 10 years and it is now pretty obvious they were capable of melting stone. That last stone looks like it was melted into place and written on
I watched a video that claims it was like cement.. But some of these.l I don't think so
that looks like soft rock it can easily can be carved with axe or chisel i have seen the same stone work in midas city turkey which was worked on soft rock .the real mystery is the granite in egypt
@@sbk162 For sure, I have done a lot of research on Egypt. That's my favorite place on earth
@@Mike-mp8ce why would it be a mystery as they had all the slave labor as a workforce and were rulers with proven high skilled engineers
@@onnietalone3181 I don't believe it was slave labor.
Incredible how the stones interlock and how whoever did it manage it 🤯. I just hope one day in my life time we discover how it was done! Brilliant stuff love it 👍🏼
Battle scares , high energy weapons , who ever was there lost that fight .
To my eye some of the piles of stone/rock look like the slag that comes out of iron smelters. On others that have been formed you can see the where they are going to make the cut. Great video. More thoughts and questions than answers. My view is that these ruins go back anything up to 100 thousand years and were destroyed by the makers with some kind of unknown energy source. Q:- but why?
Great works and love the music. Seriously capturing my attention big time. With an open mind this is transformational. Mesmerizing.
Если бы у нас была возможность своими глазами увидеть то, как создавались эти объекты, мы бы увидели что-то, что не описано в известной нам истории. По сути, мы почти ничего не знаем о прошлых цивилизациях.
After going to Peru and seeing these rock cuts don’t give me the copper chisel crap anymore!
Obsidian , dude used it to copy ancient Egyptian carvings . Was easy for him.
Excellent video! Thank you very much for sharing on TH-cam. Best regards.
3:11 that is definately scorched / Melted rock, what on earth has done that then. The saw cuts the jigsaw impression is just mind blowing.
Cool soundtrack as well.👍
Read the comments, @mark lewis said FRESNEL LENS @12:48. Look it up.
Not just "Unknown methods", but who, when, why, and how? The mainstream archaeologists have no idea.
As an artist myself I can recognize in some of the rocks that they were used as sketchbooks and you can notice those stone builders were testing the tools and the advanced technology at disposal. If only we could know this technology...we can only imagine the wonderful machines, tools and technology of the ancient stone builders.
Hey man, just wondering if you can point me to a timestamp of one of these testing rocks.
I don't have an artists eye, but I'm curious if we can narrow down our speculation on what form these tools took. Thanks
@@askmeaboutfreewill5791 I’m not so sure I see the artistry either but the idea they were testing their tools at some of these locations bring a whole new to why so many of these seem random with no purpose; like why carve into the side of a mountain or giant stones with no intended purpose?
Some of the images reminded me of the results of using forms for pouring concrete.
Like I mentioned in another comment, looks very "clay" like as though after a deluvial flood and sedimentary rock is laid down, would it take time to harden?
My thing is we are looking at this with 12,000 years of weathering & still there's right angels & sharp edges. When
this was done it must of been pristine, like straight off the manufacturing line & don't forget this stone is granite, around the same hardness as steel.
They weren't processing " Stone".... it was much softer then. The were carving the Deposits left behind from the flood of the Bible !
@@ggzz6862Really? Do, tell me, how do you know it was much softer then?
D@@emanjam45『EDEN MEDIA』の『この世界の石は生きていた』を視聴して下さい。
@@emanjam45 It's called the flood of the bible . There are countless indicators as to how deep the deposits left behind were all over the world !....It also lines up perfectly with Occam's Razor
@@ggzz6862 there are three types of stones ..... Metamorphic igneous and sedimentary. Every stone that was left over by the flood would come under the category of sedimentary that has nothing to do with the types of stones we are talking about.... what you need to do is go back to the first grade and start over again because you do not have an education
Best locations, best details, shots and angles, best music, best storytelling etc. summa summarum film director qualities!
These builders were so far ahead of us, as we are now, we are like someone from the middle ages coming across a television.
And becoming dumber after this experience !
@@etherospike3936 speak for yourself
@@clarencehawkins9503 the parallel wasn't the most appropriate as if television can enlighten someone...And yes when I wach tv I feel a bit stupider , because I know they are speaking crap- especially CNN -therfore TV would not be of use for any medieval man, I would recommend him to read some books !
@@etherospike3936 I understand
when you consider lightning the massive flow of electrons under high voltage and consider tesla (who created our entire elect grid) theorized it could be harnessed at certain frequencies. It may stand to reason a previous civilization with a similar genius harnessed the earth. could summon forth energy and understood earths frequencies. the natives report the stone was softened. the stone looks like it worked like clay, easily. too bad stone can't be dated....
Our technologies are not that sophisticated unless we can replicate those impossibles of the ancients. Awesome filming of the works of the ancients. Thanks.
I travelled to Peru a few years ago and knee a lot of this sites personaly. Sometimes the stones seens cutted with laser, Sometimes it seens mellted in the place! Impossible to copy today with our modern machines.
When I carve a styrofoam block with a heated loop of wire, it makes scooped shapes in the material, allowing me to lift out a certain volume of the foam. The shapes made in the foam block are some similar to some of the shapes here, seemingly scooped out of stone.
but some lines on the puma claws are very straight, but at the same time also looks like melted. it looks like they used the tool for cutting the stone, to carve the litlle puma. was the stone melting like styrofoam?
I agree, I've thought about that as well. I have a theory --- I think some of these sites were classrooms -- students being taught how to use the ancient tools and perfect the techniques. That's why I think you see some of those obvious little protrusions on some of the stones in walls, but not others. They stuck some kind of melting device into the stone, made the stone like a bread of dough, but the timing had to be just right to pull the device back out again and the younger more inexperienced workers were left with the pull out marks. Other stones you see some square indentations -- this is because the stone was sagging -- maybe because the devise was withdrawn too fast and they pushed the stone back up into place with pieces of wood. Just a theory
We have to say thx for letting something like this behind so we can wonder how they did it and why
It looks like they were testing their power tools on these rocks. Like when you have some new machine and want to know what can you be able to do with it. It looks like they were having fun cutting extremely hard andesite
Sometimes it’s seems they did things to leave behind just to toy with us.
beautiful video! amazing evidence of a very special phenomena! thanks for sharing!!
Excellent material, congrats.
Some of the stones look like damage done by electrical discharge experiments done by the Thunderbolts Project in a laboratory recommended you check them out also. I definitely believe they are way older than we are being told.
i like this music ..
..i been watching your documentaries over 2 years ..keep it up.continue with further new findings in ancient archeology.
thank you .
So megalithic era was actually when human using ancient advanced technology during and before the last ice age, and this technology couldn’t be passed down to the next generation because of the great floods and other cataclysmic events, makes sense
Don't ask me how but stone was being melted and molded back
In that time is clearly..and other cutting techniques were in use
Buena video muy buena filmación a los cortes y figuras en las piedras todo filmado con mucha precisión y mucha calma muy profesional de lo mejor que he visto gracias sigan así sin ocultar nada
Some of this is like an area where people were learning to use the tools.
Why am i just seeing this video now? I watch this topic all the time and never heard of this channel lol
I just saw it too. Maybe YT let it up out of the noise because it was trending.
Lot of stuff I've never seen in this video after watching lots about these sights thank you
Interesting pictures of rocks, a commentary about what we’re looking at and why would have been helpful in explaining everything. Nevertheless, we have been given the opportunity to see stoneworks not seen in the usual videos.
The commentary is 'how was this created' ?
We have no explanations for any of these cuts, shapes or holes, all we have is speculation and guesswork.
I will never cease to be amazed at the crazy stuff people are willing to believe to avoid questioning the official story. Marshmallow rocks, cutting rock with concentrated sunlight, acid mud? How is that more easy to believe than ancient civilizations? Is it an ego thing?
I'm right there with you~!!! Maybe God sent down the rock cutting Angels.
@@RickaramaTrama-lc1ys I really do believe it is ego. I think people couldn't handle the idea that older civilizations were more advanced and that we're deteriorating, not just morally but technologically. So much for evolution, which runs contrary to the idea that we're farther from perfection than when we started.
Anyone who has used a arc gouging rod to burn steel can see similarities on some of these stones...
I see the same: a flat 3mm blade, a curved blade, and rods. Assuming they had the tools, I can't imagine how these were adjustable tools of varying size and why there isn't slag everywhere.
That Indian dude Praveen Mohead or Mohan is all over this subject also... I love his videos as well on topic
Yes he is awesome!
And Roger Spurr from Mudfossil University does a great job too.
It was done with machines and technology that we cannot replicate at this time. Anyone telling you it was chisels, hammers etc are lying.
The quartz embedded in the stone at 14:26 looks like alphabet letters we use today. Apparently it was made in a way that would be difficult to destroy.
Meaning something wanted it to be visible for all time.
It's amazing how people react to this subject, as if they were scared of it. Just like bullies at school, ridiculing the kid they don't understand because it's easier that way, and the rest of the sheep are guaranteed to follow, making you feel powerful when the reality is that you are weak, just like your arguments.
This kind of work is absolutley amazing, and it doesn't matter how many hundreds of years you keep repeating yourself that it has been done by primitives with stone and copper tools, it simply isn't possible. We don't know how it was done, because it's not in the archeological records, the Incas couldn't have done it, unless they had some secret technology that hasn't survived with the rest of their heritage. I personally don't deal in speculation, I much rather work with what we have, and what we have is tool marks, tons and tons of tool marks, that to anyone with some experience in the field are an absolute mind fuck, and the day we decide that this subject is worth investigating, as it is, they will provide a solid base for a real study.
Now, all you "learned professionals" can keep laughing or pulling your hair thinking we all believe aliens did, a theory I'm not particularly fond of, but not any more preposterous than the one involving stone axes and copper chisels, but the truth won't change, truth being we have no idea how, or who, did it. History is not set in stone (no pun intended), it's simply pieced toghter by normal people using what little evidence is left, with a lot of assumptions in it, and more often than not with a lot of bias, and the world is old enough and suffered so many huge changes and cataclisms to have potentially erased many civilizations over and over, plus, we are not looking for traces of lost civilisations, and we are so scared of the subject that even if we found something we would most certainly explain it away. For some people the idea that everything is explained and our history is uniform, a straight line of evolution from primitives to modern humanity, is reassuring, it takes away the fear of the unknown, that tomorrow we could be blown off the ground by an asteroid or a couple of mount Saint Helen's events. Acknowledging that a civilisation with advanced science, one we can't fully wrap our heads around, existed before our own, is a direct attack to their world view, which stand fragile over its weak foundations, a view based on belief, not proof, hidden behind a facade of pseudo-skepticism, which like anybody they're entitled to, what they are not entitled to on the other hand, is forcing the rest of the world to their belief system, bullying their way from schools to universities, pretending to be recognized as authorities on a subject they know nothing about. Fortunately for the rest of us things are slowly changing, and maybe in one or two generations time we will see a dramatic change of paradigm, and finally we will be truly investigating the real mysteries of our past.
Greetings from beautiful Esquimalt, BC Canada!
At 77 and a 65 yrs student of history, I concur with everything you've written, so I won't repeat any of it, except to say that your reasoning is 100% sound.
Many people, when they cannot come up with an explanation, would rather stand back and say almost anything, except that they don't know and must wait for an explanation.
What's worse, some of them makeup incredible fictions & fables, as if make-believe is a basis for belief and action!
Highly compelling
@Nick Sothep I can't say for sure how they did it but as someone with over 20 yrs experience in concrete and stone masonry, I see extreme similarities between this stone and what concrete looks like when it is tooled and formed as it is drying. They showed examples of what looked like puddles of hardened stone, perfect joints in the blocks, and stone slag with apparent ruptured gas bubbles, similar to volcanic rock. So as I said, I do not know for certain how they accomplished these wonders of construction but if I had to make an educated guess, I would have to say that in every example shown, it appears that they somehow knew how to heat up the rock or somehow turn it into a malleable consistency to shape and lay it while building.
@@digitalninja85 truth
Thank you for a rational, eloquent and heartfelt plea to an increasingly deaf world
I actually like the lack of narration...just filming some of the more random (but mind blowing) things that other videos do not show. I feel like I am actually walking around there ...
It is obvious that they had the ability to manipulate and shape any type of stone, any way they wanted as if it was once soft and lightweight. Seems like it had to have been heat treated or chemically treated. Those paracas skulls had to have been associated with these structures and since they are a different species, the question becomes not who or how they built them, but where did these people come from and why are they now gone? Their species/genetic code appeared to have been unfavorable and selected for extinction by either nature, or something else.
Lol
Not only stone processing, the pre Incas civilization like Chavin, Tiawanaku, Wari, Nasca, Mochica, etc (search Chavin de Huantar palace, Kalasasaya temple, Fortaleza de Wari) were already using stones to make their temples, roads and other artefacts in very advanced techniques as minerals like gold, silver, copper but the most important these civilizations didn't left contaminated rivers, forest or sea like we do in nowadays.
Been a l o n g time since, appen the waste is now as tangible as the wind.
Some of those marks look like they were experimenting with the technology more so than having an actual purpose.
Really good point, actually
Hey kids, check this shit out!
Have a fun new toy. Go bananas!
Question! How do stone artifacts that are “15,000 years older” than these sites and rolling around in soil appear to be in better conditions than these extremely weathered stones?
There was a great video last week on giant stones in a wall in Russia, was overlooked by the local people who were used to it.. Thanks very interesting footage..☯️👌
15:48 Helplessly watching on an ancient writing of completely unknown civilization. Who they were? How powerful they were given those mind blowing stone softening techniques? What other realms they mastered? It really freaks me out.
@Oftin Wong Too bad for Inca empire, they were really underdeveloped. However, my thoughts are about the first ones who built those megalithic marvels.
@Oftin Wong I'm not proving anything, just observing facts. And since you mentioned it, I'm considering geopolymer concrete theory as well. What I'm certain, those were not Incas.
@Oftin Wong So, man made rock is not a choice either. Interesting. Are you suggesting that the megaliths were carved by Incas with some primitive bronze/copper tools? Letting alone perfect drill holes and traces everywhere of "molten" rocks.
@Oftin Wong I don't say they were stupid and incapable, just pointed out their level of development acknowledged by mainstream archaeology. And why do you put into the same basket hand made axe heads and anomalies like perfectly drilled holes, circular saw marks, molten stone, and much more... Let alone the sheer size of these blocks. You don't have answers. Take some time to see the difference what Incas really built and what they found when first came there.
@Oftin Wong Molten rock is the way to describe how it looks now, all the rest is just your fantasy. Anyway, your point is quite clear, the megaliths of hard stone were carved and polished by primitive societies (including "molten" rock, circular saw, and core drill anomalies randomly applied everywhere), they've just spent enough time to wear down those rocks with no clear reason why would they waste themselves on such difficult projects. And with these claims you feel reconciled? Obviously, you don't really comprehend the amount of work required to wear down a granite or basalt megalith and apply above mentioned anomalies. I'm not ready to tell who exactly built those sites and which techniques they used (although the timing of at least 12000 year ago seems more and more plausible with new discoveries popping up here and there), but I'll not accept barren claims of mainstream archaeology that go against the common sense.
If currently there was a mass extinction on earth do you think it would be possible for future generations that survived thousands of years from now to relearn all of our science and technology such as laser surgery, the space shuttle, etc ? I don't think so. So I think it stands to reason that our ancient ancestors were far smarter than we give them credit for and this amazing stone work that they left behind is most likely a tiny portion of what they were capable of doing.
Maravilloso video y sin decir una palabra.
the grantie stones looks like cutted by a laser or something like heating it up until it becomes mallable (soften)
Melting
Granite melts at temperatures between 1215-1260 °C (2219-2300 °F) when dry, but the melting point decreases to 650 °C when water is present.
Molding
Once melted, granite can be poured into molds and cooled. The casting can then be reheated in a furnace to crystallize it and give it the appearance of natural granite. The time and temperature required for this process depends on the desired grain and crystalline structure, as well as the size of the casting.
Show who has done this experiment recently and where. Else it's BS.
Paul cook has a Chanel and a stone mason melted the rock with a mystery acid solution and it went to dust.
He then added water and it went into a cement-like paste..
There are Egyptian hyroglith that show the same process.
@@CARPB147
@@oldskoolbeats1989- "a mystery acid solution". Yeah, right... I'm pretty open-minded, but that is just useless info.
once granite has been melted it become obsidian/glass like, you cannot reverse the chimical process
@@rajbalar9207 Paul Cook has a Chanel where he shows that it's possible to "fry" stone in to Powder with a mysterious acid that makes it into a powder like substance...
Then liquid is mixed with it again and it then sets to hard stone
After watching uploaders vids of these megalitic sites for many years i thought to have seen it all... you showed me i didnt...thanks
So the melt/soften the stone, how do they move a three ton melted stone. I am missing something
Thats true for glasses but most stones, in this case granite, can't be melted and reformed. In granites case it will vitrify and turn into glass if heated. That is why these structures are enigmatic.
can we not use music that plays a tinnitus tone?
i enjoyed this great job