yeah 90% of the highlights are Federer doing good points... if I didnt watch the match, but only this video. I would think that Federer won.... not lost 0-3
that's obvious, Roger played some hyper aggressive tennis due to some physical issues. He hit a lot of winners and fantastic shots, but he committed a lot of forced and unforced errors too. So Nole hit just few winners with Federer in serious difficulty. And in general Nole doesn't provide a lot of hot shots for the highlights, even when he tries, he fails everytime , he's just a solid player without a risky style of play,
@@felipetennis8342 Funny when Novak has an injury like this year's AO, everyone screams that he is faking it but here where Federer had some type of injury but somehow in the 3rd set is running around like a gazelle, not a peep from anyone.
He does not ignore but he feeds on it and it gives him strength. The Balkan mentality (and especially the Serbian mentality) finds spite to be one of the greatest motivators.
@@theDrzhivargo The Torquoise guy made virtually the exact comment, but he got 133 thumbs up.....I bet most of these shitholes manufacture 'thumbs up' by themselves.
@@schwozluv8364 Pls tell me why you have the mental ability of an ant in calling Fed a robot when Djokovic is the robot. Also what is interesting about watching Djokovic be absolutely boring while playing.
Out of the top3 , RF had the nicest tennis game in his career, but this clip is just a microcosm of why he cannot be considered the greatest. He beat lots of guys in the 00's just by sheer tennis skills/ability but when he was faced with opponents with mental fortitude like Novak he wasn't able to overcome. Yes he won matches against him but I get the feeling he was just content to let his silky skills defeat opponents which at the very top might not always work.
@@draoicht22 2011 US Open semi, 2019 Wimbledon Final - Novak wrecked part of Roger's psyche.. so he had no true mental stamina/confidence to beat Novak anymore. It was only a matter of how bad he was going to lose.
Djokovic is simply the greatest hard-court player ever. A joy to watch how he counteracts Fed's attacking game with his own defensive/offensive game. Brilliant entertainment.
Djokovic was shell shocked with Federers level in 1st set. Had federer won that set it could have been a different match. Perfect attacking tennis always triumphs best of defense
@@blistering2900 Federer plays high risk/high reward tennis. Nearly impossible to maintain a high level over 5 sets. Hence, Joker always beats him at the majors.
It’s just fascinating to see how many matchs Federer has Djokovic totally under control and of a sudden Djokovic breaks his mental side completely. The only time I do remember the opposite was when Federer turned a 2-5 in Wimbledon 2014 to win the set, but still lost in the 5th.
It’s not lack of mental strength. You guys sound ignorant. Federer won 20 grand slams and was in a SF pushing 40 yrs of age. His mental strength was there. It was a simple case of an aging champion vs a younger champion. Novak is five years younger. From 2011, youth was always gonna be on his side. He just outlasted Federer down the stretch. That’s why Fed was more of a threat in 3 setters vs the five set format
@@dramamania1762 you dont need to be so full of yourself to call people “ignorant “, specially when you are wrong. Yes, age plays a big role there against Roger, but the lack of resilience is clear. It didnt happen after 2011, you could see it many times against Nadal many years before. Federer had enough level to win either 06/07 FO finals, which he didnt because he couldnt sustain mentally the game. What about missing 2 MP against Djokovic 3 times in grand slams? Losing the first set of FO final 2011 against Nadal with a 5/2 advantage? Man i followed their entire careers closely, and thats pretty clear.
At this point, the rivalry between the fans is ten times fiercer than the actual players' rivalry. It's pitiful. Maybe stop calling each other 'djokobitch' and 'fedtard' and try to appreciate the fact that these guys are still even playing at their ages. Spend more time enjoying the damn sport than ruining it with stupid debates. Just watch the match for the sake of watching the match, not bragging about who wins. It's just immature as hell and tennis doesn't deserve to be turned into a political spectrum full of commenting gangs going around spreading insults.
J024 doesn’t give people an excuse to insult fans. The point of highlights is to provide the most crucial points and the best points. Federer, by nature, hits more flashy winners than Djokovic. They’re trying to get people to watch the videos, not trying to provide a spread of points won corresponding to the total points won. Case in point: first set, Federer goes up 5-2 with several beautiful winners, taking a 16-2 lead in winners over Djokovic. Djokovic hits back by outlasting Fed in rallies and playing a beautiful tiebreak. Clearly Djokovic’s style won out, and often wins out, but it’s not the most watchable *in the minds of those who made this video*. At least that’s my guess.
5-2 30-0 first set.. dude has an extreme mental block vs djokovic. He needs to see some guru guy to improve his confidence or something. If it was anyone other than djokovic he would win. And its not necessarily because Djokovic is playing god like hes just not making unforced errors and roger just chokes.
Watching these highlights you'd think Fed won....but he didn't. Thanks for the unbiased highlights AO.....i remember djokovic hitting more winners that you showed here. Idemoooo Nole!!!
They do not seem biased to me. Federer had 46 winners in this match and Djokovic had 31. I think this match more than any other, explains why Federer's tennis style is preferred by so many people as opposed to Djokovic's. The fact that Federer had 15 more winners in this match than Djokovic, when the serb was the one who won the match in straight sets, that speaks volumes about a lot of things. Tennis is not just about numbers, stats and records.
@@andreim.5324 exactly, these fans are so blind to how boring and defensive Djokovic's style of play is. He simply capitalizes on slow courts to just push the ball back in play and cash in on the opponents unforced errors. This approach will obviously kill Djokovic in fast courts, and is proven by how badly he was dominated by Roger in the fast court era with ACTUAL TENNIS. Looking at the rally pace, I sometimes wonder whether they're playing with a tennis ball or a rock lol
Amrithya Balasubramanian what are you talking about? Djokovic has beaten Federer on indoor hard many times and beaten him at Cincinnati. It favors Federer but Novak can also play in quick conditions. ALSO winners doesn’t tell the whole tale, Fed May have more winners but don’t mistake Novak for some pusher. He hugs the baseline, dictates play and hits MANY shots that fed may get a racket on but can’t do anything with. If fed wants to throw in unforced errors as well all the more good.
Andrei M. Actually at the end of the day that is what tennis is about lol, being overly aggressive and making unforced errors along with winners doesn’t go into the GOAT conversation or matter at all. It’s about WINNING? Lol
@@jeremypendergast7029 it kinda does. Even in Wimbledon Djokovic got destroyed with 90 something winners for Federer against only like 50 for Djokovic. And Djokovic was playing a 38 year old dinosaur. Winning is not everything. Wimbledon 2019 was a perfect example of how the better player can sometimes still lose. Federer basically beat himself in that match
Never seen a player who can execute every shot brilliantly like federer does ever. Serve, Forehand, Backhand, slice, volley, overall net reactions, dropshots etc. He seems to do it with such ease, like its natural. Absolute magician.
I tried tenis once and I was athletic and in great shape played basketball for a district team ; but I couldnt hit the ball inside the squares or serve properly so I realized the sport was not for me 😂 also that little ball moved fast, maybe I needed coaching
This was a huge win for Djokovic, because he made a wonderful comeback in the the first set! His mental toughness and accurate shot making are incomparable!!!
Only comparable to Federer "bad face", the one you can see only againts Novak :) The funny thing is that at 4-1 0-40 his face ssems much more relax, until he loses the point...and regain his bad face, you musst have seen that.
I agree with you. What a biased highlights. Novak WON this match in THREE STRAIGHT SETS, but I just watched a compilation of Federer points for eighteen minutes. What a shame!
the point of highlights is to show the most interesting points. it doesn't matter who won, if federer won most of the interesting points, they will show federer winning more.
By biased crowd you mean people who prefer a different player and a different playstyle?! I find funny when people say that because the tennis crowd it s usually very respectfull and cheers for both players whenever they win a point.
@@mridulgupta1944 But what's wrong with that? If it benefits a player you aprecciate it makes sense to cheer in those situations. I was commenting in the fact of the term "biased", there's nothing biased in a tennis crowd, people cheer for the player they prefer. Some crowds can be thoughers than others, that I can admit... the French crowd it's hard to please!
Nole is doing to Federer exactly the same what Rafa has been doing to Federer on clay since they first met. No matter what the score was, Rafa always came out victorious. Now (well, its been some years now) it is Nole. Wimbledon 2019 is another example. Hajde Nole👍👍👍
Novak's strategy against Federer- 1. Rally ball to Feds backhand 2. Play the ball low and deep 3. Slow down the pace of the rallies. Feds backhand becomes weaker the more times he hits the ball with it. Add to the fact that the ball he receives are mostly deep and low which requires more accuracy and the right amount of power to return it properly. Novak also dictates the rallies by preventing Fed to use his favourite combo.
@@user-gx4cd1jb9h It’s because Roger is extremely talented. He can got every shot in his capability. That’s why, most of the times he can win over players other than top ones even when he is way below his best. One time he beat Zverev mostly just slicing low and drop shots. Zverer was in form at the time.
Federer is doing all the running - back and forth - side to side. In order to produce those shots he needs to use his legs a lot - people are fools if they think that Federer's style of play is not exhausting - it is because. His fast and perfect shots are looking easy but they are produced with a lot of effort and a lot of knee bending - hence injuries in these areas. These highlights show actually how Djokovic is just standing on the baseline and directing the ball all over the court - this is his talent - a lot diversity at depth, angles and all kinds of placement of the ball. He is making his opponents to run across the whole court making offensive play with controlled aggression. This is 90% of this matches. But they always show his defensive skills and shots because they are very acrobatic and winners from sliding positions - his unmatched acrobatic abilities to hit balls while jumping for a slide, while on the move to the opposite side, etc. and always with a balance and at the centre of the racket - this sets him apart from all the players I have watched till now.
The first set was extremely close with multiple breaks exchanged. The second set was close too but Federer got broken serving at 5-4 that too after it went to duece The third set it clearly seemed that his injury started to impact his game. It would be an enormous task to come back from 2 sets to djokovic But the level of play in 2019 and 2020 AO by a 38yo federer (saving 7 match points in the previous game) against djokovic was amazing. Thd only time djokovic ever dominated Federer was at 2016 AO first 2 sets
@@trumpameri1638 Lol. He is nemesis for injured Fed all right. Otherwise he is just good at tiebreaks and cant win a set with a break against a guy who is 38 years old.
tennis world we’ll I can’t disagree with you, from an objective point of view. Both are great, Nole arguably will win nevertheless. Just don’t like people bathing in Fedal’s injuries getting carried away. Respect.
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c injured or not fed ain’t beaten djok since 2012 stop playing he even beats him on his best surface Wimbledon stop playing! U choose to go on court ur fit! He was 5-2 30 love up seemed pretty fit to me! None of u fedal lot can take it that he’s just beating him and has his number now!! Getting tiresome it really is
You know Fed was injured this match? If he wasn't it would have been a different story, even considering that Thiem almost beat Nole and took him to 5 the next match
Ismet iCi The comment is correct actually since he didn’t play his best against Fed but still beat him in the Wimbledon final. Also, what has Thiem taking him 5 sets got to do with this?
@@ismetcehic5581 what is the point you're trying to make here? Hypothetical situations that didn't happen? So what if Roger was injured? I wasn't claiming he played his best... You can't deny that this is something Novak is good at. He was injured many times and won, he didn't play his best but still found the way to win. This doesn't take away from the fact that Roger is an amazing player.
@@amrithyabalasubramanian6703 don't call me a princess weirdo. The minute you start using terms like 'jokeovic' you lose all credibility you wanted to have. You're living in a delusion.
I completely agree with you. What a biased highlights, made by a Federer fan. It seems Djokovic fights against the opponent, against the crowd, and against the biased media!
@@enginduzu don't be dense. Djokovic plays a safer, more consistent game that relies on outlasting the opponent and letting him make an error. Federer is a play maker. It's very clear that Djokovic's method is better for winning, but Federer makes more highlight-worthy plays. No bias here.
@@jordyjordyjordyjordyjordy Mr 40-15 is putting a show to provoke the fans to go crazy against Djokovic and not playing fair like a champion. I think it's one of his tactics to distract Djokovic, but Djokovic has done his homework a long time ago, so he's ready to go.
Typical example of biased media against Novak and pro Federer. Most of the highlights are Federer’s winning shots, while Novak beat him in 3 sets! Pathetic western media!
Even when he loses, Fed's backhand looks so good these days. Not just beautiful, but really, really solid and steady. Great job to Ljubicic for turning that shot around.
Respect to Roger for not retiring mid match due to his injury after 2 five setters. He is after all displays good ethic throughout his professional career 1511 matches completed and 0 retirement. 🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
and still its just whit 6 year more bigger then djokovic :) imaginate if wase djokovic whit 6 year bigger then federer then federer i guess its gonne win all matches in stricht sets
Get your head out of the gutter. Their head-to-head is still 23 to 27 and Novak is six years younger. It makes perfect sense that he's slightly ahead because he's slightly younger. Not to mention that Novak's 4-match lead happened during the 2016 season when Roger practically broke his back from scoliosis. And Federer had to adapt to all of the courts changing in the late 2000s. They all got way slower which is a huge advantage for Novak's groundstroke-based game. The rivalry is very close but Novak clearly has unfair advantages that have to be considered.
@@theaviator1152 Perhaps the change of court surface in 2008 AO affected Federer's record @Melbourne . Since the change from Rebound Ace to Plexicushion happened , Djokovic has established his authority in Melbourne . Federer put @ disadvantage by the surface change.
razneK No, I’m saying it’s nobody’s fault, and Novak fans need to stop acting like it’s Roger’s fault with ‘weak era’ nonsense and Slam counts. Because when Roger was 32, he was still winning Slams continuously. He had accomplished almost everything Novak has today (except for winning all Masters 1000s but that’s because Rafa, Novak, Murray, Ferrer, Verdasco, Davydenko, Berdych were all in their freaking mid-twenties so don’t bother me about that!) And on that note, it’s not like anybody in their mid-twenties is giving Novak trouble today. Because they’re all Next Gen garbage! Thiem is like the only one who puts up any sort of fight! Think about it: up until around 2017, everybody in the top ten was over 27 or 28 years old. Now, they’re all under 25 (which is what we saw and were amazed by way back fifteen years ago when Roger was rising up and destroying poor Agassi lol) but instead of being great rookies like Roddick, Hewitt, heck even Rafa were, they’re trash! I mean, you had Dimitrov being number 3 for months! (Flashback to racket-smashing Baby Fed days) And the only reason Zverev was number four for so long was because of that super sketchy, really close, total BS win against Roger (remember, in the middle of a crucial point in the final tiebreak he suddenly started whining about a ballboy and stopped play). He literally did nothing else. He had NO TITLES and he’s number 4 for TWO YEARS! That’s how crap they are! This compares to how Roger had to overtake old GOATs Sampras and Agassi while fighting off Roddick by winning dozens of titles in a row, then Rafa had to beast his way through multiple clay seasons and finally win Wimbledon, then Novak had to emerge on hard courts and do marathon after marathon against Roger in New York, meanwhile they all have Murray, Safin, Ancic, Ferrero, Nalbandian, Gasquet, Haas, Berdych ALL lingering in the background! Plus the big guys like Isner, Querrey, Karlovic, and way more! Sorry not sorry, but the top 100 is GARBAGE compared to ten years ago! You have to face it guys: tennis was the best ever from 2003 to 2015. There was no weak era for Roger: *it was a strong era for all of tennis*. And Novak is taking advantage of that now. I’m not saying he should be discredited, I’m just noting that he was born at literally the most convenient time imaginable to win. Lol
Aaron Maher I mean, I imagine that if he didn’t stall out with the racket switch, he could have peaked at 34. In fact, I would say 2015 was his best year since 2009.
Great job AO on these highlights, first time watched some replay of each and every point played by the player who lost the match. How did you feel that burn? Straight sets Nadal last year, and Federer this year. You better warm up to Djokovic, he is the only endorser you’ve got.
@@Aman-nk5uq Nope pretty much alive, commenting here as proof. Did you btw mean that I would have died of shock after seeing Rafa beat Novak in straight sets? To politely respond, no I was not shocked. I was content in knowing that Novak made it to the finals. Beating Rafa is next to impossible on Clay, and the same goes for beating Novak at AO. I was wondering if you felt like dying during AO 2019 final, straight sets right? You really need to get some perspective. If you want to get salty, then go post a comment on a Pro Roger video. Don't come here, just because you don't have anything to do in your life.
As Steve Flink said if he didn't think he had a chance he should have defaulted. He also said Federer played well and Djokovic was kind to acknowledge what appeared to be a phantom injury. However, Djokovic gets called out for all sorts of gamesmanship yet Federer had a groin, back, groin, back, groin injury that didn't show up on a scan and rather than rest it he went to South Africa to play and beat Nadal. Nonsense. Djokovic realized about halfway through the first set that there was no injury and he had to focus. The end.
Lmao he was clearly injured, he could barely move. Novak acknowledged it because it was obvious. And throughout their career, Novak has always retired midway blaming injuries, so the whole "shouldn't have played if you were injured" is a retarded hypocritical logic
@@s.l5787 I didnt see in a first set any Federer injurie. He played focused and agressive. Djokovic was polite, ofc he wouldnt say Federer is faking. Federer was exhausted and tired but injuried no.
He was clearly injured and revived a medical timeout. He said it was brutal playing through it. He didn’t default bc he doesn’t do that and fans payed lots to see them. Class act. Also, did you watch the match with Nadal? It was at 50% lmao, they were having fun.
Even if Djoković wins , No one can be ever compared to Federer as a man of complete WISDOM and the best player we all have ever seen Literally no one can be like Federer!!
This is why FEDAL fans hate DJOKOVIC so much.. the numbers don't lie, NOVAK had the head to head records in terms of matches against these two, ESPECIALLY in terms of GRAND SLAM semis/finals.. everyone keep saying how Grand Slams are the determining factor for being the GOAT. Well, since 2011 until today (that's already 10 years btw), NOVAK had the RECORD against these two! The ONLY reason why FEDERER had the most slams today is because he earned MAJORITY of those during 2004-2007, the time when DJOKOVIC who just turned pro and was just getting a hang of it, the professional tennis life, and Nadal getting the RG every year (only winning RG). 2004-2010 GS records: Federer - 16 slams (majority of it came from 2004-2007) Nadal - 9 slams Djokovic - 1 slam 2011 - 2020 GS records: Djokovic - 16 Slams Nadal - 10 slams Federer - 4 slams Djokovic is just a year younger than Nadal and he is very close to matching his record considering that NADAL had turned pro much earlier than NOLE, PEAKED along with NOLE pretty much and won GS at such early age which made NOLE's wins even more impressive.. Roger won 16 of his slams when he was basically ALONE dominating the rest of the slams when Nadal was just solely winning clay court titles and major and Novak was just an upcoming player at age 18-20.. Novak had to play against NADAL, MURRAY, Del Potro and Wawrinka and Federer during his dominating years and he still managed to earn 16 slams.. GS records: 1. Federer - 20 GS wins; 11 finals 2. Nadal - 19 GS wins; 8 finals 3. Djokovic - 17 GS wins; 9 finals now who's the GOAT?
yeah, after Fed's prime years are over ? What was the H2H by 2011/12. Djoko is sweeping up with no real competition ! this draw in AO was a joke for him too.
What about Agassi? Novak is doing to Fed what Fed did to Agassi. No one talks about that. Agassi was still in his early 30s and was reaching second week of grandslams on a consistent basis.
@@kushanshah8040 federer lost his no 1 spot to Nadal when he was 27 and Novak started to dominate him when he was 29. Novak at 32 plays way better than Federer did at that age.
Its comical how so many people credit all federer’s defeats to Novak to a “mental block” not because Novak is just better than him. Stop the BS! Its not a mental block. By saying its a mental block you guys diminish Novak quality. He is just a superior player, that’s it.
Igor Lucena as of now, he is definitely the better player. However, I do think a mental block exists even if it wasn’t highlighted here. It showed at the Wimbledon final last year when he had 40-15 and approached the net behind a poor forehand
And all other Novak’s 17 slams and possible slam record on the horizon is all a matter of “mental block” with the other players with him. Right. 👏. Genius.
Igor Lucena Lol, NEVER said that😂 I just think Roger could beat any player he faces, but Nole’s mentality is way better than Roger’s. Do you think that Nole was deserving to win last Wimbledon after losing his serve and being 40-15 down? Spoiler: NO, he wasn’t deserving to win. Roger missed the next points and lost because in crucial moments Nole takes better decisions while Roger (especially against him) is less lucid. Simple as that. (Sorry if you notice some errors but I’m not English, I try my best to explain myself.)
@@apathak34novak only started declining in this year, and thats barely and only in his physicals. His shot placements and depths are still there, hes still outlasting kids in gs.
@@apathak34 he’s more aggressive in his earlier years, yes, he has better stamina and power in 2011. But 2015 onwards his tactics, placement, consistency, his serve, his net game got better. He doesnt need that much power anymore. After the 2017 elbow surgery he lost power, but everything still there, including the trademark return r still there.
Novak got lucky Federer chocked! By no means did Novak do anything exceptional on the match points! It was Federer's nerves and panic that got the better of him, and felt the need to rush into the net, on a horrible approach shot, in which even a good challenger or circuit player, would have been able to hit a winner from there!
@@derekmcgregor7459 Only here Roger was injured, so this was not a legitimate choke, when they both meet, if they both meet, in next Grand Slam, both at 100% fitness, then we'll have to see, if Roger chokes or not, when in a winning position.
Great match on Djokovic's end. Federer was visibly worn from his 2 five-setters against Sandgren and Millman that really went the distance...Either way, we are fortunate to still see Federer and Djokovic dominate tennis as they have done over the past 2 decades (with Nadal) - truly incredible!
I think this scoreboard is counting wrongly. In this highlight I counted that Federer had 36 points and Djokovic had 28 so it must have been that Federer won this match. Propaganda can change your perspective of seeing things. Highlight should be short represent of the event. Shame on you journalist
Are you seriously trying to say that Federer won this match?? Millions of people have seen this match, but somehow you think you caught them cheating Federer? Lmao, Federer fans will literally make any excuse when he loses. This is a highlight reel you idiot, there’s a chance that they put in more of Federer’s shots.
@@endistherenown776 He's saying that they put more of Federer's winners in the highlight video than Djokovic so it seems like Federer won even though he didn't
In this case people are not dumb, highlights are exactly like the name implies, the best moments from the match. Cry all you want but Fed simply plays more beautifully and in turn makes better points, thats why he will always shows up a lot in the HIGHlights even when he loses.
In slams Federer is 4-10 vs Nadal and 6-11 vs Djokovic, his 2 biggest rivals. 😬 But yeah he did very well against Roddick, Hewitt and whoever... so impressive.👏😏
@Kevin Weng You lot are so obsessed with your Weak Era theory that you say the stupidest things without realising. Additionally, your comment is totally unrelated to mine, but you lot basically have Weak Era Tourette's at this point.
@Kevin Weng Yes, because getting older in competitive sports is merely a theory, obviously. You are welcome to think I'm audacious; your comment is still stupid and, more importantly, irrelevant.
@Kevin Weng Well, you see, I'm neither a teenager nor a Serb living vicariously through a tennis player I support, so I really don't see it necessary to "save" anyone from anything. Again, your "needing time to grow and mature" remark is not relevant to what I said, nor did I imply that it was not relevant in competitive sports, but have fun projecting. I find it honestly bizarre that so many of you think so little of Federer and his achievements and yet are completely obessed with him and his achievements. But I know y'all only started watching tennis ten years ago, so...
@Kevin Weng This is getting really boring and you can't possibly be this thick. You know full well that I am not sincerely making that statement, so why the disingenous argument? Simply to argue? As for your desperation for Federer fans to "just accept" whatever it is you feel needs just accepting, it is curious that you, along with many other fans, don't feel confident that the stats speak for themselves.
40 year old Roger is 3rd in the World and still gives a hell of a fight to a god tier Novak. Novak's mind is just to strong and can comeback from anything. Nowadays no one can break Djokovic even twice a match but grandpa Roger did it more times in a set
He is no king. He is a champion with 8 titles alone in Melbourne, a great player whom I look up to. He is no king as Melbourne does not regard him as the king here. The people choose their king, not the other way around. ATP announcers call him the king of Melbourne but I say again, we don’t see him as our king, and he never will be. His attitude on and off the court is shit. He is a fake person with zero class. He may sound charitable but ultimately it is to make himself look good. He should not be the king anywhere, even with 100 grand slams.
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c He's the king of double-handed tennis. It's actually bad for the game. Make it a game of skill again. Geez. With single handed tennis, you may get Theim vs Federer! Surely that is huge!!!
Alan Chong I agree with you, he can hold the title of king of double backhand. However, single and double have their pros and cons. So that requires more discussion
lol how could you not one guy is an asshole on court with his faces and shit its just unlikable nothing complex. one guy gloats like a wacko and one guy is just happy like a normal person; is one better than the other? nah they both sick af djoko better now but like lets be honest his yelling and wack shit is sooo cringe
@@ivancevicaleksandar55 ah you like the obnoxious yelling, you must be american xDD (it's a joke cuz I'm american I just hate in your face sports people)
@@seankeegan4468 You can't be normal when everybody in the crowd is sabotaging you in a way. Would you be calm if people cheered on your double faults, and pretending to cough when you prepare to serve? No! Novak isn't doing 10% of what he should do in those situations. He is not pointing anything against Federer when cheering, he is pointing to the crowd.
Look at the score @ 3:54 …. 1-4 0-40 against Federer, from the jaws of defeat Nole has it in him to make an unreal comeback.. Nerves of steel, guts, and greatness 🙌🏾🙌🏾
@Amanda Cerny Well, my friend, I'd put my two hands together if you were a man with the same ability as Djokovic. I'll tell you a secret, though it doesn't require a big iq. They love Federer because tennis is a sport for the rich and snob ... Therefore, the rich snob audience is in the majority ...
@@mrglance1 I know it's because of it. I think the crowd tried to achieve that in every federal and djoko match. Because they fear that they will defeat their pet ...
@Amanda Cerny I like how you all just say "he is not a likeable person" 1) Who are you to say that he is not likeable? Are you guys in a Federer cult or something? Not everyone think the same as you or handful of tennis fans that get the chance to be in audiences and openly cheer AGAINST Novak. 2) Let me tell you why he is not likeable: he keeps fucking Fedal all day long, and you can't accept that fact.
Theres no fortune there. Federer missed in crucial moments and collapsed in the remaining of that set. Got into the tiebreaks but thats not his territory agaisnt Nole. Nothing new tbh
Jus one year ago, in his 38/39, he has been in unbelievable form.. Federer is dangerous because during unpredictable times, he beats the prime opponent. Anytime now top 10, the storm is coming!
Rafa , Federer, djokovic and Del potro . The day these guys stop playing, my interest in tennis will drop by 98%. Lets not compare these 3. All are legends in their own good way. Lets enjoy the rivalry while tuy are still active
Federer absolutely exhausted here after his very tough matches in previous rounds. He only really got the lead in the first set because Djokovic seemed to have really bad nerves and played very tight at times. Djokovic switched his game on exactly when he needed it. Once Djokovic got his game going, Federer didn't have the energy left to keep up.
After the last point, Djokovic showed his respect for Roger, and that he learned a lot from him, especially the finger stroke performed by Roger after 2011 RG SF.
Federer is thé Goat, thats why his points are so wonderful to watch. Those knees must be slowing him down, not even moving close to 60% and still put on a show. Novak being in his usual Tom & Jerry self 🥱
federer has in his absolute best time against murray, djokovic, nadal a 12-10 (4-3 by grandslams) H2H from 2004-2007 Djokovic has in his absolute best time against murray, federer, nadal a 29-10(11-0 by grandslams) H2H from 2015-2020 THIS IS THE REAL DIFFERENT, who the REAL GOAT IS
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 65 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "จ้าวเสือใหญ่ vs ผึ้งหลวง"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TDpOh5eEJKw/mqdefault.jpg)
Fed wins the point
Novak’s score goes up
BRILLIANT HIGHLIGHTS
Idiotic and fucking highlights
yeah 90% of the highlights are Federer doing good points... if I didnt watch the match, but only this video. I would think that Federer won.... not lost 0-3
that's obvious, Roger played some hyper aggressive tennis due to some physical issues. He hit a lot of winners and fantastic shots, but he committed a lot of forced and unforced errors too. So Nole hit just few winners with Federer in serious difficulty. And in general Nole doesn't provide a lot of hot shots for the highlights, even when he tries, he fails everytime , he's just a solid player without a risky style of play,
@@danielbenes1348 Because most of the exciting points were won by Federer
@@felipetennis8342 Funny when Novak has an injury like this year's AO, everyone screams that he is faking it but here where Federer had some type of injury but somehow in the 3rd set is running around like a gazelle, not a peep from anyone.
3:21 He realizes that "most are not with him." And what does he do? ignore. Incredible. Absolutely wonderful. What an enviable athlete.
He does not ignore but he feeds on it and it gives him strength. The Balkan mentality (and especially the Serbian mentality) finds spite to be one of the greatest motivators.
kerversonfelipe but hes getting so much cheer pig eater
2020 was so long that I totally forgot this match ever happened
Lmao frrr I’m glad I’m not the only onw
I just came back to this was surprised this actually was a thing
Djokovic seriously have a monster level mental strength.
Novak will break Federer's 310 weeks at #1 without having to play any tennis! He'll pass Sampras in 4 weeks.
since 2011 dudes a monster
@@theDrzhivargo The Torquoise guy made virtually the exact comment, but he got 133 thumbs up.....I bet most of these shitholes manufacture 'thumbs up' by themselves.
Not federen day am a Djokovic fan
Jeffrey Kaufmann No he won’t. Records are suspended during this time. He will have to wait until the tour starts again.
90% roger highlights but Djokovic wins every set.
Because Djokovic is boring
@@halfsouthafrican He wasn't boring when he smacked 40-15erer's ass
@@halfsouthafrican your mom is boring
@@halfsouthafrican Boring for what ? win every point as cold water ! take it easy brother our blood is hotest than in southafrica
@@halfsouthafrican No he is not Djokovic is awesome
Djokovic produces magic: crowd just claps
Federer drinks water: crowd gives standing ovation
Cause Djokovic doesn't produce magic and Federer is actually interesting
@@tennisuniverse5671 federer wastes match point points, that's interesting about him😂
@@normanbates1794 Djokovic screams like a child, that is interesting. 🤣
@@tennisuniverse5671 pls do tell what’s interesting about watching the robot Federer who continuously chokes every opportunity he gets to make history
@@schwozluv8364 Pls tell me why you have the mental ability of an ant in calling Fed a robot when Djokovic is the robot. Also what is interesting about watching Djokovic be absolutely boring while playing.
Love it when Djokovic silences the crowd😂😂😂😂
princedamako what?
Nole shuts their mouth. I love that!
*Novak came back from* 4-1 0-40 down to win the set wtf.
He really is on another level.
5-2 0-30
Really he was just warming up
And against whom!
Out of the top3 , RF had the nicest tennis game in his career, but this clip is just a microcosm of why he cannot be considered the greatest. He beat lots of guys in the 00's just by sheer tennis skills/ability but when he was faced with opponents with mental fortitude like Novak he wasn't able to overcome. Yes he won matches against him but I get the feeling he was just content to let his silky skills defeat opponents which at the very top might not always work.
@@draoicht22 2011 US Open semi, 2019 Wimbledon Final - Novak wrecked part of Roger's psyche.. so he had no true mental stamina/confidence to beat Novak anymore. It was only a matter of how bad he was going to lose.
Djokovic is simply the greatest hard-court player ever. A joy to watch how he counteracts Fed's attacking game with his own defensive/offensive game. Brilliant entertainment.
Federer,Djokovic,Nadal and Sampras....mount rushmore of tennis in my book.
Djokovic was shell shocked with Federers level in 1st set. Had federer won that set it could have been a different match.
Perfect attacking tennis always triumphs best of defense
@@blistering2900 Federer plays high risk/high reward tennis. Nearly impossible to maintain a high level over 5 sets. Hence, Joker always beats him at the majors.
@kal Ke Federer is the king of grass....only sampras is closer to him. Djokovic and Fed are almost equal on hardcourts.
@kal Ke You mean human Fed v super human Djokovic - the super human will win :-))
Just passing through on my journey to watch every Federer match.
It's so satisfying to watch people do something they're brilliant at . Wow
He always has the crowd against him and uses that to his advantage. Incredible mental Strength
That fact makes him even 10 time more GOAT 🍀🐐❤️🇷🇸
he doesn't use anything to his advantage.
Novak is stronger and that's it.
Probably the last time we’ll see these two legends play each other. End of an era..
Agreed. So sad they had to their terrific rivalry by this shithole of a match.
No I am sure they'll play a couple more... Atleast hoping..
There is only one legend I saw in this match and its not No Vac 😉
@@DoubleYouRandyBe Then you know nothing about Tennis, just a biased soul you are🤣
@@DoubleYouRandyBe you are a n word
It’s just fascinating to see how many matchs Federer has Djokovic totally under control and of a sudden Djokovic breaks his mental side completely.
The only time I do remember the opposite was when Federer turned a 2-5 in Wimbledon 2014 to win the set, but still lost in the 5th.
Federer lacks mental strength in key moments, especially against Novak...
@@thenotorious2226yes he can judge everyone and the higher the mentality of player against him he gets weakee
It’s not lack of mental strength. You guys sound ignorant. Federer won 20 grand slams and was in a SF pushing 40 yrs of age. His mental strength was there. It was a simple case of an aging champion vs a younger champion. Novak is five years younger. From 2011, youth was always gonna be on his side. He just outlasted Federer down the stretch. That’s why Fed was more of a threat in 3 setters vs the five set format
@@dramamania1762 you dont need to be so full of yourself to call people “ignorant “, specially when you are wrong. Yes, age plays a big role there against Roger, but the lack of resilience is clear. It didnt happen after 2011, you could see it many times against Nadal many years before. Federer had enough level to win either 06/07 FO finals, which he didnt because he couldnt sustain mentally the game.
What about missing 2 MP against Djokovic 3 times in grand slams? Losing the first set of FO final 2011 against Nadal with a 5/2 advantage? Man i followed their entire careers closely, and thats pretty clear.
Federer going frequently to the net made him lose easy points.
At this point, the rivalry between the fans is ten times fiercer than the actual players' rivalry. It's pitiful.
Maybe stop calling each other 'djokobitch' and 'fedtard' and try to appreciate the fact that these guys are still even playing at their ages. Spend more time enjoying the damn sport than ruining it with stupid debates. Just watch the match for the sake of watching the match, not bragging about who wins. It's just immature as hell and tennis doesn't deserve to be turned into a political spectrum full of commenting gangs going around spreading insults.
Ok mom, sorry mom.
Agreed, at least the players respect each other. So many fans are ridiculous with their language and disrespect
Then let networks start by creating proper highlight videos, not this shit where most winning points shown are the ones won by Fed.
J024 doesn’t give people an excuse to insult fans. The point of highlights is to provide the most crucial points and the best points. Federer, by nature, hits more flashy winners than Djokovic. They’re trying to get people to watch the videos, not trying to provide a spread of points won corresponding to the total points won. Case in point: first set, Federer goes up 5-2 with several beautiful winners, taking a 16-2 lead in winners over Djokovic. Djokovic hits back by outlasting Fed in rallies and playing a beautiful tiebreak. Clearly Djokovic’s style won out, and often wins out, but it’s not the most watchable *in the minds of those who made this video*. At least that’s my guess.
@@owenlewis6399 That shouldn't be relevant. The Highlights should be balanced properly.
5-2 30-0 first set.. dude has an extreme mental block vs djokovic. He needs to see some guru guy to improve his confidence or something. If it was anyone other than djokovic he would win. And its not necessarily because Djokovic is playing god like hes just not making unforced errors and roger just chokes.
So true fed is the better player but crumbles and beats himself story of this matchup
@@ertugrulkorpinar51 how exactly is fed a better player?
@@ertugrulkorpinar51 Federer is not better than Djokovic. Only delusional Fedtards can think otherwise.
@@ertugrulkorpinar51 so thats why he hasnt beat djokovic in 8 years in GS? 😂
DR because Djokovic is a master of outlasting fed physically over 5 sets . Executes his gameplan well and also relies on Feds choking
Watching these highlights you'd think Fed won....but he didn't. Thanks for the unbiased highlights AO.....i remember djokovic hitting more winners that you showed here.
Idemoooo Nole!!!
They do not seem biased to me. Federer had 46 winners in this match and Djokovic had 31. I think this match more than any other, explains why Federer's tennis style is preferred by so many people as opposed to Djokovic's. The fact that Federer had 15 more winners in this match than Djokovic, when the serb was the one who won the match in straight sets, that speaks volumes about a lot of things. Tennis is not just about numbers, stats and records.
@@andreim.5324 exactly, these fans are so blind to how boring and defensive Djokovic's style of play is. He simply capitalizes on slow courts to just push the ball back in play and cash in on the opponents unforced errors. This approach will obviously kill Djokovic in fast courts, and is proven by how badly he was dominated by Roger in the fast court era with ACTUAL TENNIS. Looking at the rally pace, I sometimes wonder whether they're playing with a tennis ball or a rock lol
Amrithya Balasubramanian what are you talking about? Djokovic has beaten Federer on indoor hard many times and beaten him at Cincinnati. It favors Federer but Novak can also play in quick conditions. ALSO winners doesn’t tell the whole tale, Fed May have more winners but don’t mistake Novak for some pusher. He hugs the baseline, dictates play and hits MANY shots that fed may get a racket on but can’t do anything with. If fed wants to throw in unforced errors as well all the more good.
Andrei M. Actually at the end of the day that is what tennis is about lol, being overly aggressive and making unforced errors along with winners doesn’t go into the GOAT conversation or matter at all. It’s about WINNING? Lol
@@jeremypendergast7029 it kinda does. Even in Wimbledon Djokovic got destroyed with 90 something winners for Federer against only like 50 for Djokovic. And Djokovic was playing a 38 year old dinosaur.
Winning is not everything. Wimbledon 2019 was a perfect example of how the better player can sometimes still lose. Federer basically beat himself in that match
Carrying an injury and fed played fabulous..thats the talent of this man..no matter he is playing good or not..he is always not easy to play..
Actually u are right he was suffering from knee injury but he played very well
Never seen a player who can execute every shot brilliantly like federer does ever. Serve, Forehand, Backhand, slice, volley, overall net reactions, dropshots etc. He seems to do it with such ease, like its natural. Absolute magician.
It's even more impressive that Novak defeated him in 3 sets.
when were you Born? 1999?
@@mtklaric mmh...yes
you do realize Fed lost the match....😄😆😅🤣
Federer had a very weak mental strength.
This is how long the highlight should be!
Good work!
I feel the exhaustion and muscle aches just by watching the game. Just by the first set. Jeez tennis is insane.
Tennis is so hard man, people think tennis is a cakewalk
Perzcute yeah
I tried tenis once and I was athletic and in great shape played basketball for a district team ; but I couldnt hit the ball inside the squares or serve properly so I realized the sport was not for me 😂 also that little ball moved fast, maybe I needed coaching
@@Perzecute no tennis is not easy. I tore BOTH my calves in 6 months. Tennis destroys your body.
This was a huge win for Djokovic, because he made a wonderful comeback in the the first set! His mental toughness and accurate shot making are incomparable!!!
Only comparable to Federer "bad face", the one you can see only againts Novak :)
The funny thing is that at 4-1 0-40 his face ssems much more relax, until he loses the point...and regain his bad face, you musst have seen that.
The commentators and the highlights kind of weird, all I can hear and see that Federer's playing so well but he ends up losing!!
Exactly lol
The commentators are awful
I agree with you. What a biased highlights. Novak WON this match in THREE STRAIGHT SETS, but I just watched a compilation of Federer points for eighteen minutes. What a shame!
Very true lol!!
@@enginduzu Djokovic did hit some amazing shots
After these highlights one would think RF has won! Why always so biased and unfair to Novak??
Sanja Marjanov ...RF is a dinosaur lol Nadal and Novak will break his Grand slam record soon don’t worry
BECAUSE NOVAK IS THE BEST,
AND HE IS FUCKING THE REST !
Well someone who isn't blind/deaf can see/hear that Djokovic won at the end of the highlights.
Most of the highlights in this video show Federer winning points. And yet he got absolutely crushed in this match. Way to go, Australian Open!
the point of highlights is to show the most interesting points. it doesn't matter who won, if federer won most of the interesting points, they will show federer winning more.
Federer's backhand technique is wonderful!
It's pretty to watch, but he has lost countless majors because his backhand breaks down. Especially in pressure moments.
@@bobmiller1902 not since 2017.
@@tomicthetankengine5932
Yes almost entirely to Djokovic.
20 GS baby...
20 and counting.
For how long will you deny the goat 🐐
And counting? Federer is getting knee surgery, very unlikely he reaches 21 GS
JUST A JOKE
24 n counting.
@@naathnaath637724 and counting
Always a pleasure to watch Federer vs Djokovic in 20 fps
I love how Novak silences these biased crowds and commentators at various tourneys!
Biased? Lol!
All majors at least 😁😁
By biased crowd you mean people who prefer a different player and a different playstyle?! I find funny when people say that because the tennis crowd it s usually very respectfull and cheers for both players whenever they win a point.
@@diogoesilva6214 you can't say that about wimbeldon and us open. they cheer when the opponent of their favourite player hits a double fault!!!!
@@mridulgupta1944 But what's wrong with that? If it benefits a player you aprecciate it makes sense to cheer in those situations. I was commenting in the fact of the term "biased", there's nothing biased in a tennis crowd, people cheer for the player they prefer. Some crowds can be thoughers than others, that I can admit... the French crowd it's hard to please!
Nole is doing to Federer exactly the same what Rafa has been doing to Federer on clay since they first met. No matter what the score was, Rafa always came out victorious. Now (well, its been some years now) it is Nole. Wimbledon 2019 is another example. Hajde Nole👍👍👍
Novak's strategy against Federer-
1. Rally ball to Feds backhand
2. Play the ball low and deep
3. Slow down the pace of the rallies.
Feds backhand becomes weaker the more times he hits the ball with it. Add to the fact that the ball he receives are mostly deep and low which requires more accuracy and the right amount of power to return it properly. Novak also dictates the rallies by preventing Fed to use his favourite combo.
nah, his strategy is to wait until fed gets old and past his prime, injured and mentally weak from his battle scars.
4. old age
5. knee injury that required 2 surgeries
@@haydenleung4833 6. excuses (since how would he reach semi's if he was injured with 2 surgeries needed???)
@@user-gx4cd1jb9h It’s because Roger is extremely talented. He can got every shot in his capability. That’s why, most of the times he can win over players other than top ones even when he is way below his best. One time he beat Zverev mostly just slicing low and drop shots. Zverer was in form at the time.
@@tattwa1 Yes, he is talented when injured, but Djokovic can't be injured he is immortal so he fakes every injury
Federer is doing all the running - back and forth - side to side. In order to produce those shots he needs to use his legs a lot - people are fools if they think that Federer's style of play is not exhausting - it is because. His fast and perfect shots are looking easy but they are produced with a lot of effort and a lot of knee bending - hence injuries in these areas. These highlights show actually how Djokovic is just standing on the baseline and directing the ball all over the court - this is his talent - a lot diversity at depth, angles and all kinds of placement of the ball. He is making his opponents to run across the whole court making offensive play with controlled aggression. This is 90% of this matches. But they always show his defensive skills and shots because they are very acrobatic and winners from sliding positions - his unmatched acrobatic abilities to hit balls while jumping for a slide, while on the move to the opposite side, etc. and always with a balance and at the centre of the racket - this sets him apart from all the players I have watched till now.
The first set was extremely close with multiple breaks exchanged.
The second set was close too but Federer got broken serving at 5-4 that too after it went to duece
The third set it clearly seemed that his injury started to impact his game.
It would be an enormous task to come back from 2 sets to djokovic
But the level of play in 2019 and 2020 AO by a 38yo federer (saving 7 match points in the previous game) against djokovic was amazing.
Thd only time djokovic ever dominated Federer was at 2016 AO first 2 sets
I'm beginning to think that Djokovic is purposely taunting Federer, by letting him Think his going to win.
And then shut that door in the end.
Hahaha lol. Good try there.
It's OK, Djokobitch fans are known to experience frequent episodes of delusion, so what you're thinking IE normal...for a Djokobitch fan 😂😂
Mongoose vs snake watch this and u will see same battle NOVAK vs FedEx... NOVAK DJOKOVIC is nemesis for FedEx hahahaha
@@amrithyabalasubramanian6703 nemesis is NOVAK second name hahahaha
@@trumpameri1638 Lol. He is nemesis for injured Fed all right. Otherwise he is just good at tiebreaks and cant win a set with a break against a guy who is 38 years old.
Amazing tennis by Nole!!! Absolutely brilliant againt RF..Wooohooo..!!!!
You mean an injured RF? Who sustained a vital injury? Yeah, brilliant
tennis world we’ll I can’t disagree with you, from an objective point of view. Both are great, Nole arguably will win nevertheless. Just don’t like people bathing in Fedal’s injuries getting carried away. Respect.
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c man you are awesome you are not at all like the toxic stupid haters , respect to you buddy
Great Magic It would have been at least 4 sets tho
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c injured or not fed ain’t beaten djok since 2012 stop playing he even beats him on his best surface Wimbledon stop playing! U choose to go on court ur fit! He was 5-2 30 love up seemed pretty fit to me! None of u fedal lot can take it that he’s just beating him and has his number now!! Getting tiresome it really is
Djokovic made Federer enjoy himself for a bit,and took the enjoyment from Federer's soul,body,mind and fed fangirls too.
The goat Mr novak djokovic.
Yes because that’s what Goatovic does, he lets you have some time in the sun and then crushes you into a peanut.
The thing I love about Novak is that he doesn't have to play his best in order to win against the best. He can always find another way.
You know Fed was injured this match? If he wasn't it would have been a different story, even considering that Thiem almost beat Nole and took him to 5 the next match
Ismet iCi The comment is correct actually since he didn’t play his best against Fed but still beat him in the Wimbledon final. Also, what has Thiem taking him 5 sets got to do with this?
@@ismetcehic5581 what is the point you're trying to make here? Hypothetical situations that didn't happen? So what if Roger was injured? I wasn't claiming he played his best... You can't deny that this is something Novak is good at. He was injured many times and won, he didn't play his best but still found the way to win. This doesn't take away from the fact that Roger is an amazing player.
@@amrithyabalasubramanian6703 don't call me a princess weirdo. The minute you start using terms like 'jokeovic' you lose all credibility you wanted to have. You're living in a delusion.
Ismet iCi why is it that everytime someone loses in sports, they’d complain that they were injured lmao
Novak certainly silenced that crowd lol. Good on him!
In reality Djokovic beat roger, but in highlights it seems roger beat djokovic, 😆😆😆 a absolute middle finger
I completely agree with you. What a biased highlights, made by a Federer fan. It seems Djokovic fights against the opponent, against the crowd, and against the biased media!
@@enginduzu don't be dense. Djokovic plays a safer, more consistent game that relies on outlasting the opponent and letting him make an error. Federer is a play maker. It's very clear that Djokovic's method is better for winning, but Federer makes more highlight-worthy plays. No bias here.
@@jordyjordyjordyjordyjordy Facts.
@@jordyjordyjordyjordyjordy Mr 40-15 is putting a show to provoke the fans to go crazy against Djokovic and not playing fair like a champion. I think it's one of his tactics to distract Djokovic, but Djokovic has done his homework a long time ago, so he's ready to go.
Their differing game styles mean that roger generally produces more highlights, that’s all
Typical example of biased media against Novak and pro Federer. Most of the highlights are Federer’s winning shots, while Novak beat him in 3 sets! Pathetic western media!
Don't cry now
I'm a neutral 😑 Don't worry Nole will have the last laugh.
Well said!
@@halfsouthafrican I don't think he's crying. His guy won in straight sets. Media and crowd are lacking class.
he won 3-0 but in the winners stats it was 46-31 for Fed so ofc highlights would favor him(mostly winners are shown)
Federer has the whole court going with him, still lost
Nice finger celebration at the end, exactly the same Roger did at RG 2011 when he won.
Revenge is a cold meal lol.
After 10 years finger celebration
Even when he loses, Fed's backhand looks so good these days. Not just beautiful, but really, really solid and steady. Great job to Ljubicic for turning that shot around.
Crowd : Roger. Roger.!
Djokovic : When the crowd chant Roger, i hear Novak. Hihihihihi.
Respect to Roger for not retiring mid match due to his injury after 2 five setters. He is after all displays good ethic throughout his professional career 1511 matches completed and 0 retirement. 🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
Even when it's 3 setters they always play amazing matches.
Definitey the highest in quality rivalry of the big 3.
Fed tried but Djokovic was a little faster and played important points much much better. Great win for Djokovic!
and still its just whit 6 year more bigger then djokovic :) imaginate if wase djokovic whit 6 year bigger then federer then federer i guess its gonne win all matches in stricht sets
@@nykoflow2746 Uhhh
@@nykoflow2746 no.
@@nykoflow2746 Did I just magically understand german LOL
Federer was injured....
Imagine playing like this while being 40 years old !
Fedrer was unbelievable we won’t witness anyone like him surely again
I love that you can always sense that Federer cannot take a loss, especially against Djokovic.
Atleast he didnt retire like a certain somebody in the US open last year.
Amrithya Balasubramanian cry some more please
Oliver McCall as federer was in this semi final
He was actually injured, but later you see that after all the buzz and nobody cares about it.
@@amrithyabalasubramanian6703 it hurts, we know.
They are both amazing and have tons of respect for each other ...
Poor Federer,you have nightmares because of NOVAK DJOKOVIC....So many years you are his best client!!!
Deticated to all haters...
Get your head out of the gutter. Their head-to-head is still 23 to 27 and Novak is six years younger. It makes perfect sense that he's slightly ahead because he's slightly younger. Not to mention that Novak's 4-match lead happened during the 2016 season when Roger practically broke his back from scoliosis. And Federer had to adapt to all of the courts changing in the late 2000s. They all got way slower which is a huge advantage for Novak's groundstroke-based game.
The rivalry is very close but Novak clearly has unfair advantages that have to be considered.
@@theaviator1152 Perhaps the change of court surface in 2008 AO affected Federer's record @Melbourne . Since the change from Rebound Ace to Plexicushion happened , Djokovic has established his authority in Melbourne . Federer put @ disadvantage by the surface change.
@@theaviator1152 unfair advantages? His fault he younger?
razneK No, I’m saying it’s nobody’s fault, and Novak fans need to stop acting like it’s Roger’s fault with ‘weak era’ nonsense and Slam counts. Because when Roger was 32, he was still winning Slams continuously. He had accomplished almost everything Novak has today (except for winning all Masters 1000s but that’s because Rafa, Novak, Murray, Ferrer, Verdasco, Davydenko, Berdych were all in their freaking mid-twenties so don’t bother me about that!) And on that note, it’s not like anybody in their mid-twenties is giving Novak trouble today. Because they’re all Next Gen garbage! Thiem is like the only one who puts up any sort of fight! Think about it: up until around 2017, everybody in the top ten was over 27 or 28 years old. Now, they’re all under 25 (which is what we saw and were amazed by way back fifteen years ago when Roger was rising up and destroying poor Agassi lol) but instead of being great rookies like Roddick, Hewitt, heck even Rafa were, they’re trash! I mean, you had Dimitrov being number 3 for months! (Flashback to racket-smashing Baby Fed days) And the only reason Zverev was number four for so long was because of that super sketchy, really close, total BS win against Roger (remember, in the middle of a crucial point in the final tiebreak he suddenly started whining about a ballboy and stopped play). He literally did nothing else. He had NO TITLES and he’s number 4 for TWO YEARS! That’s how crap they are! This compares to how Roger had to overtake old GOATs Sampras and Agassi while fighting off Roddick by winning dozens of titles in a row, then Rafa had to beast his way through multiple clay seasons and finally win Wimbledon, then Novak had to emerge on hard courts and do marathon after marathon against Roger in New York, meanwhile they all have Murray, Safin, Ancic, Ferrero, Nalbandian, Gasquet, Haas, Berdych ALL lingering in the background! Plus the big guys like Isner, Querrey, Karlovic, and way more! Sorry not sorry, but the top 100 is GARBAGE compared to ten years ago!
You have to face it guys: tennis was the best ever from 2003 to 2015. There was no weak era for Roger: *it was a strong era for all of tennis*. And Novak is taking advantage of that now. I’m not saying he should be discredited, I’m just noting that he was born at literally the most convenient time imaginable to win. Lol
Aaron Maher I mean, I imagine that if he didn’t stall out with the racket switch, he could have peaked at 34. In fact, I would say 2015 was his best year since 2009.
So nice to see Djokovich winning finally, without much crowd support!
Great job AO on these highlights, first time watched some replay of each and every point played by the player who lost the match. How did you feel that burn? Straight sets Nadal last year, and Federer this year. You better warm up to Djokovic, he is the only endorser you’ve got.
Did u die after watching 2020 French Open final??
@@Aman-nk5uq Nope pretty much alive, commenting here as proof. Did you btw mean that I would have died of shock after seeing Rafa beat Novak in straight sets? To politely respond, no I was not shocked. I was content in knowing that Novak made it to the finals. Beating Rafa is next to impossible on Clay, and the same goes for beating Novak at AO. I was wondering if you felt like dying during AO 2019 final, straight sets right?
You really need to get some perspective. If you want to get salty, then go post a comment on a Pro Roger video. Don't come here, just because you don't have anything to do in your life.
@@Aman-nk5uq so what's the point of bringing FO final?
@@Aman-nk5uq ohh u might be Rafan so u brought it here. Well then look at 2021 too
@@Aman-nk5uq L comment my dude, Nole destroyed Rafa even worse in the 2019 AO Final lol.
Federer entered this match with an injury
It was a last Djokerer.
As Steve Flink said if he didn't think he had a chance he should have defaulted. He also said Federer played well and Djokovic was kind to acknowledge what appeared to be a phantom injury. However, Djokovic gets called out for all sorts of gamesmanship yet Federer had a groin, back, groin, back, groin injury that didn't show up on a scan and rather than rest it he went to South Africa to play and beat Nadal. Nonsense. Djokovic realized about halfway through the first set that there was no injury and he had to focus. The end.
Jonathan Wallach ☝🏽👊🏽🙇🏽♂️
True Federer wasn't injured. Exhausted maybe but not injured.
Lmao he was clearly injured, he could barely move. Novak acknowledged it because it was obvious. And throughout their career, Novak has always retired midway blaming injuries, so the whole "shouldn't have played if you were injured" is a retarded hypocritical logic
@@s.l5787 I didnt see in a first set any Federer injurie. He played focused and agressive. Djokovic was polite, ofc he wouldnt say Federer is faking. Federer was exhausted and tired but injuried no.
He was clearly injured and revived a medical timeout. He said it was brutal playing through it. He didn’t default bc he doesn’t do that and fans payed lots to see them. Class act. Also, did you watch the match with Nadal? It was at 50% lmao, they were having fun.
O melhor de todos os tempos do outro lado, torcida sempre contra, ele explosivo...nao tem jeito, junta tudo e nada pára o grande DJOKOVIC!
Even if Djoković wins , No one can be ever compared to Federer as a man of complete WISDOM and the best player we all have ever seen
Literally no one can be like Federer!!
It’s true I’ve never seen such an amazing player with so much skill continually blow large leads, simply remarkable and enjoyable to watch Chokerer
So what? Djokovic is still GOAT.
@@sj4632 Leave it brother, You won't understand why Federer is the Greatest and why I said this 😊
@@efilonsavicphoenix2491 stupidity?
@@alpine3931 yessssss
This is why FEDAL fans hate DJOKOVIC so much.. the numbers don't lie, NOVAK had the head to head records in terms of matches against these two, ESPECIALLY in terms of GRAND SLAM semis/finals.. everyone keep saying how Grand Slams are the determining factor for being the GOAT. Well, since 2011 until today (that's already 10 years btw), NOVAK had the RECORD against these two!
The ONLY reason why FEDERER had the most slams today is because he earned MAJORITY of those during 2004-2007, the time when DJOKOVIC who just turned pro and was just getting a hang of it, the professional tennis life, and Nadal getting the RG every year (only winning RG).
2004-2010 GS records:
Federer - 16 slams (majority of it came from 2004-2007)
Nadal - 9 slams
Djokovic - 1 slam
2011 - 2020 GS records:
Djokovic - 16 Slams
Nadal - 10 slams
Federer - 4 slams
Djokovic is just a year younger than Nadal and he is very close to matching his record considering that NADAL had turned pro much earlier than NOLE, PEAKED along with NOLE pretty much and won GS at such early age which made NOLE's wins even more impressive..
Roger won 16 of his slams when he was basically ALONE dominating the rest of the slams when Nadal was just solely winning clay court titles and major and Novak was just an upcoming player at age 18-20..
Novak had to play against NADAL, MURRAY, Del Potro and Wawrinka and Federer during his dominating years and he still managed to earn 16 slams..
GS records:
1. Federer - 20 GS wins; 11 finals
2. Nadal - 19 GS wins; 8 finals
3. Djokovic - 17 GS wins; 9 finals
now who's the GOAT?
yeah, after Fed's prime years are over ? What was the H2H by 2011/12. Djoko is sweeping up with no real competition ! this draw in AO was a joke for him too.
I´m a Nadal fan. I like Djokovic too though.
jimmysp4des lol what’s wrong with u there’s no real evidence for ur claim
What about Agassi? Novak is doing to Fed what Fed did to Agassi. No one talks about that. Agassi was still in his early 30s and was reaching second week of grandslams on a consistent basis.
@@kushanshah8040 federer lost his no 1 spot to Nadal when he was 27 and Novak started to dominate him when he was 29. Novak at 32 plays way better than Federer did at that age.
Its comical how so many people credit all federer’s defeats to Novak to a “mental block” not because Novak is just better than him. Stop the BS! Its not a mental block. By saying its a mental block you guys diminish Novak quality. He is just a superior player, that’s it.
Igor Lucena as of now, he is definitely the better player. However, I do think a mental block exists even if it wasn’t highlighted here. It showed at the Wimbledon final last year when he had 40-15 and approached the net behind a poor forehand
It's a mental block
@@Rohit-yb5nf not only...it's also a question of tennis
And all other Novak’s 17 slams and possible slam record on the horizon is all a matter of “mental block” with the other players with him. Right. 👏. Genius.
Igor Lucena Lol, NEVER said that😂
I just think Roger could beat any player he faces, but Nole’s mentality is way better than Roger’s. Do you think that Nole was deserving to win last Wimbledon after losing his serve and being 40-15 down? Spoiler: NO, he wasn’t deserving to win. Roger missed the next points and lost because in crucial moments Nole takes better decisions while Roger (especially against him) is less lucid. Simple as that.
(Sorry if you notice some errors but I’m not English, I try my best to explain myself.)
The roar of Djokovic at 12:45 is like he's saying: "For you, Fedal hater"
Both of them have improved unbelievably since I started watching them.
And declined significantly since their peaks.
@@apathak34 novac? Not yet
@@apathak34novak only started declining in this year, and thats barely and only in his physicals. His shot placements and depths are still there, hes still outlasting kids in gs.
@@NamTran-xc2ip His power and stamina is not close to his 2011-12 level.
Watch his matches from 2011.
@@apathak34 he’s more aggressive in his earlier years, yes, he has better stamina and power in 2011. But 2015 onwards his tactics, placement, consistency, his serve, his net game got better. He doesnt need that much power anymore. After the 2017 elbow surgery he lost power, but everything still there, including the trademark return r still there.
The way Nole clawed his way back into 1st set seems to have had great impact on Roger.
Hello
Whoever can beat Nole, even for a mini break, deserve that applause?
Love how Nole shut the crowd.
as usual crowd against Novak. this only makes him more determine to crush roger... 17th and more to come
I am sure players don't give a damn about the crowd....even roger doesn't; it's a disturbance.
Novak got lucky Federer chocked! By no means did Novak do anything exceptional on the match points! It was Federer's nerves and panic that got the better of him, and felt the need to rush into the net, on a horrible approach shot, in which even a good challenger or circuit player, would have been able to hit a winner from there!
@@pauljohnson6019 Fed has been choking against Novak a lot then. 3% chance of winning...Roger's own words.
@@derekmcgregor7459 Only here Roger was injured, so this was not a legitimate choke, when they both meet, if they both meet, in next Grand Slam, both at 100% fitness, then we'll have to see, if Roger chokes or not, when in a winning position.
I am a die hard federer fan, but even i have to admit, djokovic is in Federer's head now. Like how nadal used to be..sad
little did we know this was the last Federer-Djokovic match
And the last appearance at the Australian Open for Roger.
Federer was injured in Australian open 2020 mostly
What you talking about, their last match was the 2019 Wimbledon Final, and it couldn’t have been a better last match to end the era with.
@@justchillin6314 What are YOU talking about, the 2020 AO occurred after 2019 Wimbledon so this was in fact their last match. albeit a semi final.
@@tqsuited Well sh*t, of course it was 😂
17:28 furious look... precious!!!
Hello
Djokovic is a TIE-BREAK KING when it comes to playing Federer!!
Great match on Djokovic's end. Federer was visibly worn from his 2 five-setters against Sandgren and Millman that really went the distance...Either way, we are fortunate to still see Federer and Djokovic dominate tennis as they have done over the past 2 decades (with Nadal) - truly incredible!
Really miss Roger on tour. His style was a pure beauty. Most talented player ever
definitely the most attractive tennis ever played.
But the most talented? I doubt it
Increible ver los Mejores de Open Australia. 2020 Con experiencia ganadora Campeon 2009. /2023.
I think this scoreboard is counting wrongly. In this highlight I counted that Federer had 36 points and Djokovic had 28 so it must have been that Federer won this match. Propaganda can change your perspective of seeing things. Highlight should be short represent of the event. Shame on you journalist
Are you seriously trying to say that Federer won this match?? Millions of people have seen this match, but somehow you think you caught them cheating Federer? Lmao, Federer fans will literally make any excuse when he loses. This is a highlight reel you idiot, there’s a chance that they put in more of Federer’s shots.
@@endistherenown776 He's saying that they put more of Federer's winners in the highlight video than Djokovic so it seems like Federer won even though he didn't
Plenty of unforced errors by Federer. Quality of Novak’s points very poor. You got the reason.
In this case people are not dumb, highlights are exactly like the name implies, the best moments from the match.
Cry all you want but Fed simply plays more beautifully and in turn makes better points, thats why he will always shows up a lot in the HIGHlights even when he loses.
@@quiver99 Try to argue logic with novak fanboys, its impossible lol
In slams Federer is 4-10 vs Nadal and 6-11 vs Djokovic, his 2 biggest rivals. 😬 But yeah he did very well against Roddick, Hewitt and whoever... so impressive.👏😏
What a shame that neither Djokovic nor Nadal have another all-time great player 4-5 years younger to keep at bay. A stain on their greatness, I say.
@Kevin Weng You lot are so obsessed with your Weak Era theory that you say the stupidest things without realising. Additionally, your comment is totally unrelated to mine, but you lot basically have Weak Era Tourette's at this point.
@Kevin Weng Yes, because getting older in competitive sports is merely a theory, obviously. You are welcome to think I'm audacious; your comment is still stupid and, more importantly, irrelevant.
@Kevin Weng Well, you see, I'm neither a teenager nor a Serb living vicariously through a tennis player I support, so I really don't see it necessary to "save" anyone from anything. Again, your "needing time to grow and mature" remark is not relevant to what I said, nor did I imply that it was not relevant in competitive sports, but have fun projecting. I find it honestly bizarre that so many of you think so little of Federer and his achievements and yet are completely obessed with him and his achievements. But I know y'all only started watching tennis ten years ago, so...
@Kevin Weng This is getting really boring and you can't possibly be this thick. You know full well that I am not sincerely making that statement, so why the disingenous argument? Simply to argue? As for your desperation for Federer fans to "just accept" whatever it is you feel needs just accepting, it is curious that you, along with many other fans, don't feel confident that the stats speak for themselves.
Dude the match is unsensible
Federer's last match against his rivals
Rafael Nadal : Wimbledon 2019
Andy Murray : Cincinnati 2015
Novak Djokovic : Australian Open 2020
40 year old Roger is 3rd in the World and still gives a hell of a fight to a god tier Novak. Novak's mind is just to strong and can comeback from anything. Nowadays no one can break Djokovic even twice a match but grandpa Roger did it more times in a set
King Of Tennis. Novak Djokovic
He is no king. He is a champion with 8 titles alone in Melbourne, a great player whom I look up to.
He is no king as Melbourne does not regard him as the king here. The people choose their king, not the other way around. ATP announcers call him the king of Melbourne but I say again, we don’t see him as our king, and he never will be.
His attitude on and off the court is shit. He is a fake person with zero class. He may sound charitable but ultimately it is to make himself look good.
He should not be the king anywhere, even with 100 grand slams.
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c He's the king of double-handed tennis. It's actually bad for the game. Make it a game of skill again. Geez. With single handed tennis, you may get Theim vs Federer! Surely that is huge!!!
Alan Chong I agree with you, he can hold the title of king of double backhand.
However, single and double have their pros and cons. So that requires more discussion
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c We will discuss this later then.
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c what exactly does he do to call him fake?
After seeing the highlights, thought Federer was the winner... Well done Aus Open TV ....
Federer have zero win against djokovic in grand slam opens after 2012. Six consecutive lost...poor man.
Djokovic+nadal+ Federer= GOATs 🐐🐐🐐 of tennis 🎾 ok
8:21 - Commentators trying to hide their bias
lol how could you not one guy is an asshole on court with his faces and shit its just unlikable nothing complex. one guy gloats like a wacko and one guy is just happy like a normal person; is one better than the other? nah they both sick af djoko better now but like lets be honest his yelling and wack shit is sooo cringe
@@seankeegan4468 nope; not at all, for me; in opposite
@@ivancevicaleksandar55 ah you like the obnoxious yelling, you must be american xDD
(it's a joke cuz I'm american I just hate in your face sports people)
@@seankeegan4468 You can't be normal when everybody in the crowd is sabotaging you in a way. Would you be calm if people cheered on your double faults, and pretending to cough when you prepare to serve? No! Novak isn't doing 10% of what he should do in those situations. He is not pointing anything against Federer when cheering, he is pointing to the crowd.
@@seankeegan4468 wawrinka yells too and ppl love it
Look at the score @ 3:54 …. 1-4 0-40 against Federer, from the jaws of defeat Nole has it in him to make an unreal comeback.. Nerves of steel, guts, and greatness 🙌🏾🙌🏾
12:48 Nole vs crowd XD
It's the accumulation of the years. Federer always has the crowd by his side. Some people see it disrespectful.. What do you think?
Piss off the crowd wasn't even bias this time !
@Amanda Cerny Well, my friend, I'd put my two hands together if you were a man with the same ability as Djokovic.
I'll tell you a secret, though it doesn't require a big iq.
They love Federer because tennis is a sport for the rich and snob ...
Therefore, the rich snob audience is in the majority ...
@@mrglance1
I know it's because of it. I think the crowd tried to achieve that in every federal and djoko match. Because they fear that they will defeat their pet ...
@Amanda Cerny I like how you all just say "he is not a likeable person"
1) Who are you to say that he is not likeable? Are you guys in a Federer cult or something? Not everyone think the same as you or handful of tennis fans that get the chance to be in audiences and openly cheer AGAINST Novak.
2) Let me tell you why he is not likeable: he keeps fucking Fedal all day long, and you can't accept that fact.
Djokovic is the best
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂good joke
@@sriramsrikanthan3218 Stats don't lie , he has been officially ATP's numero uno for the last decade. Please accept the reality, it will hurt less.
🤣
I think u have been starting to see the long tennis for two years otherwise u don't say as it
ruchi singh maybe you watched tennis 2003-2008 and stopped and suddenly started again in 2017 and stopped after AO 2018.
3:41 he intentionally stood more to the right to bait djcovick into hitting it left. They playing on a whole another level.
Fortune changed at 4:11 to 4.30 in favor of Djoker. Fed missed easy forehand at 4.30, it would have given him to serve out on 5 is to 1 score.
Theres no fortune there. Federer missed in crucial moments and collapsed in the remaining of that set. Got into the tiebreaks but thats not his territory agaisnt Nole. Nothing new tbh
Here after watching AO2023…boy nole is so intimidated by roger. He is not even trying to go for rogers’ drop shots. What a magician roger is…RF❤️
Federer one the best players who played in Djoković era of tennis
Idk he definitely got to the one that ended the second set 😉
Jus one year ago, in his 38/39, he has been in unbelievable form.. Federer is dangerous because during unpredictable times, he beats the prime opponent. Anytime now top 10, the storm is coming!
Rafa , Federer, djokovic and Del potro . The day these guys stop playing, my interest in tennis will drop by 98%.
Lets not compare these 3. All are legends in their own good way. Lets enjoy the rivalry while tuy are still active
Federer absolutely exhausted here after his very tough matches in previous rounds. He only really got the lead in the first set because Djokovic seemed to have really bad nerves and played very tight at times. Djokovic switched his game on exactly when he needed it. Once Djokovic got his game going, Federer didn't have the energy left to keep up.
Blah blah blah you are blah blah blah
I seriously think that Novak gave Roger a head start to make it interesting😂
Facts
Still couldn’t believe how Roggier lost 1st set after that...
ElVitico he was injured
Yeah, everything could be changed if he had won the 1st set
Anh Tran nothing would have changed
I just say "if, bro
@@toihoibinet1675 Dude needed an injection shot just to get through Sandgren. You think he was in any condition to face Novak?
After the last point, Djokovic showed his respect for Roger, and that he learned a lot from him, especially the finger stroke performed by Roger after 2011 RG SF.
6 grand slam losses in a row to Djokovic. That's tough.
Also at least 6-13 years past his prime in every meeting!
@@GoDawgs18 13 years?! So Federer´s prime ended in 2007 at age 25. lol okay mate.
@@Romans8-9 he is drunk bro
Federer is thé Goat, thats why his points are so wonderful to watch. Those knees must be slowing him down, not even moving close to 60% and still put on a show. Novak being in his usual Tom & Jerry self 🥱
Jejeje Djokovic humilde como siempre y expresivo le dio una lección como esperado bueno deporte es deporte a seguir disfrutándo
federer has in his absolute best time against murray, djokovic, nadal a 12-10 (4-3 by grandslams) H2H from 2004-2007
Djokovic has in his absolute best time against murray, federer, nadal a 29-10(11-0 by grandslams) H2H from 2015-2020
THIS IS THE REAL DIFFERENT, who the REAL GOAT IS
Djokovic!
2020 French Open final happened though in the era you said when Novak was at his best, Rafa trashed him in that final even with bagel.
@@ashleythomas4112 Yeah and before that the 2019 AO Final happened where Rafa got destroyed by Nole.
If you just notice that even Djocovic win the title but most of the video is about how Fedrar win the points, and also the crowd in the Court.
literal icons.
What a big choke in the first set! No surprises!!