FULL INTERVIEW Juror speaks following Sanderson v. Paltrow ski collision trial
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ค. 2024
- Paltrow juror speaks about case, says testimony of biomedical expert made difference for her in Gwyneth Paltrow trial.
Sam Imrie, juror number 11, claimed the jury's other members were "on the same page" when it came time to decide in the Terry Sanderson v. Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial.
“I think we were sympathetic to both of them, we’re humans,” she said. “But we can’t let that affect us in our decision-making.”
FULL STORY: kutv.com/news/local/testimony...
_______________
Stay up to date with our social media:
KUTV Now on Facebook: KUTV2News?re...
KUTV Now on Twitter: / kutv2news
Subscribe to KUTV Now on TH-cam: / @kutv2news
Daily News Digest: • KUTV Daily News Digest
For more information, visit kutv.com/
Have a news tip? Send it directly to us: newsdesk@kutv2.com
Email us: newsdesk@kutv2.com
Call the Newsroom: 801.839.1234
KUTV is a UT based station and a CBS Television affiliate owned and operated by Sinclair Broadcast Group. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. is one of the largest and most diversified television broadcasting companies in the country today.Sinclair owns and operates, programs or provides sales services to 163 television stations in 77 markets, after pending transactions. Sinclair's television group reaches approximately 38.7% of US television households and includes FOX, ABC, MyTV, CW, CBS, NBC, Univision and Azteca affiliates.
#kutv #saltlakecity #news #utah
I’m glad this jury is talking to the press, I love following trials and it’s very interesting in the aftermath to hear the perspectives of those who had the burden of deciding the case.
Not if you’re guilty lol
I am glad they are speaking too. The perspectives of each juror are invaluable. Knowing that this juror also thought Mr Roman was not credible…very nice to know my opinion was the same.
All it tells me is that the jury was biased against Terry and that Gwynnie's experts were better.
@@ania5038 Biased why? Because they didn't believe Terry? You haven't met the jurors, yet you question their integrity? Every single juror must have been biased because?
smart juror... I said exactly what she said after terri's accident. Multiple conditions.
What an intelligent,thoughtful and even-keeled juror. She’s the kind of person you’d want on a jury.
She literally said that because GP is a celebrity she must always be honest lol that doesn't sound even-keeled to me and contradicts her claim that her celebrity played no part in the verdict. Her legal team was simply much better (and more expensive).
Except for her voice.
Exactly she had already won befor the trial started!! Shes a celebrity.. so she can’t lie! I hope she sees this and realizes she won this because of who she is! It’s obvious she crashed into him!
@@ania5038 I agree with you 100%! 🎉 I'm surprised most people are not commenting about these things. Oh well.
In any trial involving a celeb vs a non-celeb, star-struck people like you must be banned from serving as juror for the sake of justice.
She's the kind of Juror we want to have in our trials. Straightforward and honest, observant and impartial.
Biased as hell. And stupid enough to think celebrities can't or don't lie all the time. Majority of celebs are criminals. Just look at Jeffrey Epstein's friends list. Dum AF.
I can only hope to be lucky enough to have a level headed and rational young lady as this, if I ever find myself on trial. Good job to the entire jury, well done.
Just make sure you stay away from today’s court system which works hand in hand with today’s political atmosphere .
@@user-ke8st8jc1v That is so true.
Great comment - our system does best when rational people are on Juries.
She wasn't on trial.
Well done because they made a decision that you liked? A jury also found OJ innocent lol
Every time I see a juror after a case I’m impressed with how level headed and critical thinker they are! Thank you
Well - the stupid jurors are smart enough not to make a fool of themselves on national television.
You mean like grand juror Emily Kohrs in GA who was a complete embarrassment to the jury system??? Were you also "impressed" by that???
Except Casey Anthony’s
@@robertwheatley9153 exactly...that didn't work well for dear Emily did it?
She was really good explaining the decision. I’m so happy the truth came out.
What a lovely diplomatic lady. All jurors should be like her.
Perfect juror... Intelligent, knowledgeable on skiing, paid 100% attention and came to the correct verdict. Well done!
Truly perfect juror
How is this a Perfect juror! When she says celebrities can’t like or don’t lie! 😂😂😂😂
Not too smart if you ask me. She said she truly believed that he thought she was at fault. Never mentioned the GO Pro Video. Terry was really devious and his "so called witness" was trying to help him out. I'd like to see Terry's credit card statements now. Bet they"re higher than hell. He did that lavish travel because he was expecting a big payday! Terry was joking about the fame and chance at being able to get this money from Gwenth. He got what he deserved!
I’m sorry but who wouldn’t joke around about being crushed by GP! I think his so called witnesses was exactly that! A witness! We all know sanderson is a jerk! Self centered. Always wants tobe the center of attention! That doesn’t make him less credible! I’m sure his CC statements are jus as high before the accident! GP was giving the benefit of the doubt! Again why not have her husband testify? Because his story contradicts her testimony!
This was a great interview by Brian Mullahy with channel 2 news here in Salt Lake City, hats off to the juror she did such a wonderful job along with all the others involved.
excellent juror. I appreciate her saying that the jury was excited when they finally got to talk about the case, that's honest. I appreciate her being so forthcoming and she clearly stated her reasons for what happened. Thank you juror #11 for doing your duty and making the justice system work.
This jury member is amazing. So glad she was willing to do interviews.
To me, the best part about this is the beginning, where she explains she that all the other jurors are great people and that can't wait to be together them again. That means that friendships were made, this is priceless.
It also proves that the jurors were not independent minded enough and all persuaded and influenced each other and they caused a miscarriage of justice. Another jury wouldd have reached the right verdict with more systematic and thorough analysis of the evidence.
@@dianamincher6479 No it doesn't. That's one hell of an assumption. It's really sad that some people find it so easy to question the integrity of strangers they have never met.
@@dianamincher6479 so a jury that can't come to a unanimous decision , would be considered "independent minded" by you?
They are instructed by the judge to come to a decision.
This juror is legitimately real. If I ever had to be on trial for anything (God please never!) I would hope to have such a juror. She is so honest and true.
@Glennie Luckow sounds like Terry's daughter. Lol he is a con man and grifter who thought he had a easy case
God I LOVE juror interviews. SO insightful. I would 100% give all interviews. There are so many more questions I would have asked
I wished they asked about Terrys daughters. What they thought of them and their relationship. What did she think about Terry being obsessed with the case? Did she think Craig Ramone influenced Terry? Did you jurors discuss giving Gp more than $1??
@@jzpat In some jurisdictions, the jury can’t award more than the suit requests. I’m not sure about Utah. Also, because no damages beyond $1 were sought, it would have been hard to award more anyway, as no effort was made to prove the amount of any additional damages, beyond stating the cost of the lessons.
@@matthewhouse2528 I thought she asked for attorney’s fees (I didn’t watch the trial just read that somewhere). I imagine that her fees would be six figures at least. Does the dude have to pay that.
@@nottellingyou14 I hope so. I believe it’s been said that in Utah, a party seeking reimbursement of attorney fees must establish to the court that the suit was brought in bad faith. I believe there’s ample evidence that it was. I hope GP prevails in her motion for fees and costs.
Like this citizen right off the bat. All about the law. Great juror.
Very articulate and direct in how she answered the questions. Bravo
Umm, like x 100, creaky voice, extreme voice inflections. "Clearly."
@@January. I've seen your comments on other videos. Perhaps look at yourself before being critical of others.
@@ksc743 Thanks for sharing. Your pithy comment means everything to me.
@January huh? This woman is an educated nurse and comes across as such ..perhaps you don't really pay attention to the other people out there!
@@January.I agree. Her voice, especially at the end of each sentence, it gets extremely raspy. People need to stop talking that way. It’s intentional, and they think it sounds good. It does not. It detracts from what they’re saying.
This young woman did a wonderful job being interviewed. And gave such an important view of our system of justice. Her perspective is a reminder of how crucial it is that we serve our fellow members of society. ❤
She's an airhead more concerned about pleasing everyone and making friends NOT about justice
Thank you for agreeing to an interview
Terry was blind in one eye with a cataract in the other eye, and he was deaf in both ears and had to lip read. He should never have been on the slopes.
Not all true. You should watch the entire trial before coming to conclusions. Such as the fact that Gwyneth could not have. "Skied sideways in front of TS", as you said earlier. They had engineers take the stand prove how it would not have been physically possible.
He didn't seem to have any problems hearing the questions in court, so I don't think he's deaf.
FINALLY A FACT THAT NEEDED TO BE SAID, B I N G O!!!
Agree
I watched this ENTIRE trial unedited, and I came to the same conclusions as this juror. Although I wished this reporter asked about the jury’s reaction to Terry Sanders on the witness stand - especially his 2nd time on the stand when it was revealed he climbed Machu Picchu, rode bikes around 6 countries in Europe, visited markets in Morocco Africa twice - all in the years after the ski accident which he claims made him disabled!
IMO The plaintiff was a con artist looking for money and I’m glad the jury saw through it!
I climbed Machu Pichu and isn’t a joke
He just wanted a free money , I guess he feels sorry now 🤷♀️
Agree!
4/2/23
And now he is planning on an Appeal.
This guy is lucky he only had to pay one dollar. I think he loved the attention and won’t let it go.
And- he obviously raised enablers in his daughters. It’s generational much of the time.
If you hit your head and are unconscious, you're not really going to be in a position to say what happened, because reality gets knocked out of your head, even if only the few seconds leading up to being knocked out, sometimes a minute or two, if not an entire day depending on the extent of the injury.
Exactly!!!
I agree with what she said about GP that she might have assumed that someone like a paparazzi might have recorded her, and she still chose to fight it, and even if those recordings came out, she knew she would be right.
It also explains why she didn't settle. She was so sure in what had occurred. A few Lawyers/litigators on Tweeter were mocking her for not settling, but imagine the injustice you would feel for paying someone so much money, and THEY caused the accident. Like being rear ended and you having to cover the cost
@@sarad2659 yes, if you’re rear ended, you do have to cover the costs, unfortunately.
This is probably one of the best Juror interviews I have seen. She was honest and genuine. She even said she had tried to get out of it. Anyone who says they haven’t tried can’t be believed. That’s just my opinion. But she could have answered differently but she came right out and said it. She also has a positive demeanor. I think she did a good job of answering the questions.
Agree except the issue of trying to get out of jury duty. I have been called numerous times and have been selected once to be a juror. I never try to get out of it because it is the only thing my country asks of me. I don’t have to do military service. It is my civic duty to serve and people who avoid serving have no right to complain about jurors when they hear news stories about jury decisions.
What an incredibly intelligent, well spoken young lady, who based on this interview, certainly performed her civic duty as juror, with distinction. Not to make mention of her warm, beautiful smile, would be an injustice!!
Umm, like x 1000, creaky voice, extreme voice inflections. "Clearly."
@January Pointless, irrelevant, and rude to make a personal remark. You might want to stick to the subject.
@@latterrain09 Thanks for sharing. Your pithy comment means everything to me.
So very kind of you. Since when is being rude a good thing and something to be proud of? People will catch on to rudeness and you pay for being rude. People don’t like those people.
@Wesley, you read my mind! Her beautiful, warm smile is literally like a ray of sunshine beaming from her smile that lights her entire face up. I bet you could see it on the other side of the room every time she smiled lol.
The one part that convince me that GP was telling the truth apart from the expert was her anger. Her anger at being hit and its genuine to me. Sanderson was too calm.
Well Sanderson broke down, in tears over the relationship he ended with Caroline I think her name is, only to find out he started another relationship, broke up with her because his condition was so bad, BROKE UP WITH HER, based on the skiing accident, only to re-emerge later with a new woman! 😄, that’s what you call milking an incident for all it’s worth. My Lord!!!
Sanderson was to calm?! He broke 4 ribs and concussed! What did you want him todo?!..So he crashed into GP broke 4 ribs and a concussion! Notice they didn’t introduce her husband depo! It’s because he contracted GP story! Oh and she can not lie because she’s a celebrity! What a joke!
@@alexanderalexander6134 too calm in his testimony on the day of the incident. Paltrow said she was angry and the kids heard her say things that made her sound angry and pissed off. Sanderson didnt sound like a guy pissed off that he was hit.
@@DZ-eu4pj I don’t understand! What did you want Sanderson todo! He was out! It could have been 30 seconds! Nobody really knows! But we do know he was concussed! And 4 broken ribs! He was disoriented! Confused! So he didn’t drop and couple F bombs! Discounts his testimony! If he acted the way GP did he would have been this crazy dude yelling and screaming at the actress GP!
@@alexanderalexander6134
I listened to a few body language experts who followed the trial and they all agreed. They believed that Paltrow was being honest because her testimony was direct, succinct, and never deviated. They took into consideration that she was an actor but said that there are certain things that all people unconsciously do no matter who they are. As for Sanderson, many of these experts said that he probably truly believed that she hit him, but, because of his concussion, many of his memories were jumbled and influenced by what others said. It was obvious when he testified and contradicted himself and the expert testimony as to how the accident happened. I feel sorry for him, but he should never have brought this suit.
A very intelligent and lovely lady.Very grounded and I,m glad they came to the right and lawful decision.
lawful? WHere did you get that nonsense. If it was deliverable with calculation why even have humans on the jury?
@@buckgoldberg8106 what ?where did you get that from
*I'm
@@January. oops glad we have the grammer police on here.lol
@@debbiemaclean4232 The prevalence of illiteracy in the world is astounding.
Enjoyed this juror taking us through the decision on verdict!
She is so smart and aware. She is a juror I would want if I ever need one!
I hear quite a few people taking shots at this girl, and I don’t think she seemed to be looking for attention or money. She seems like she is just like anyone else who gets selected and may not really want to and did the job expected of her. And why not do interviews, people are interested. I found her to competent and straightforward, great job.
Great interview. Thanks to all the jurors for their service. Glad you made new friends through this trial.
The main thing that did it for me was all the pictures of everything he did after the crash.
Great juror. Smart, thoughtful, articulate.
She is great !! Love her. She saw the exact same thing we all did and read these people
She seems kind of slow.
Thank you for your service!
Thank you for this video.
Thank you for serving!
Sanderson should've stayed off of Facebook. His 80+ posts of him living an active and happy life said it all.
I’m really surprised Sanderson didn’t have the brains to remove those posts.
Social media is fake, you never know the full story behind a picture. He had nothing to hide, he could only travel with the assistance of his daughter after the accident.
should have posted hospital photos and keep the vacation ones to himself
Thank you. You came into this with an open mind. Enjoy spring skiing. And best wishes.
I can't believe they didn't ask her about whether Terry going on all those trips and excursions impacted his credibility
They did ask and she commented about it toward the end.
Same!
She seems like a real delight to be on any jury
Seems like a thoughtful juror. Well done to the jury. I think they got it right
Gwyneth Paltrow testified that Terry Sanderson's ski's went between her ski's/legs and she fell on top of him. I find it hard to believe that Gwyneth Paltrow was skiing with her legs in a wide position. When a person is skiing, their legs are not spread wide enough for another skier's ski's to go between their legs? She admitted during her testimony that she fell on top of Terry Sanderson. Gwyneth Paltrow weighs approximately 130 to 140 lbs. The weight of Gwyneth Paltrow falling on top of Terry Sanderson could definitely have caused 4 broken ribs on a 70 plus year old man. Terry Sanderson should have been awarded damages for his medical bills, as well as, for pain and suffering resulting from 4 broken ribs. Gwyneth Paltrow should have been responsible for Terry Sanderson's attorney fees. Poor eye contact when juror #11 was asked, "How much was CELEBRITY a factor...? Juror #11 responded, "I can honestly say that CELEBRITY wasn't a factor." 🤔 Gwyneth Paltrow recklessly pulled out in front of a school bus on a scooter with her daughter Apple riding on the back of the scooter. What would have happened if the video of Gwyneth Paltrow recklessly pulling out in front of the school bus was never recorded, and the bus driver had hit Gwyneth Paltrow causing serious bodily injury or death? I can tell you that the bus driver would not have had a leg to stand on, even though she would have been the cause of the accident. Skiers should be required to carry insurance and be licensed before flying down a mountain going as fast, if not faster than a vehicle.
Gwyneth was slow skiing looking at her kids not up the slope - the one of above has the responsibility to keep the one in front and the less skilled skiers.
The jurors are responsible to deliberate only on the testimony and evidence presented in the courtroom, not some past anecdote from a gossip rag.
Transparency is important. Corruption in the justice system needs to end.
Very credible and well spoken juror account of her experience.
I often feel jurors speaking after hi profile trials are doing it for the attention. Not so with this woman juror. I found this a great summation and very interesting to watch. Also loved she was trying to get out of being a juror and ultimately hopes this is her one and done but enjoyed the experience overall. Great job on interviewer’s part as well. ❤❤❤
I was on a federal court jury years ago for a credit union robbery. The first thing we did in the jury room was take a vote. Everyone voted guilty. In 20 minutes we were back in the courtroom with the verdict.
The Jury got it Right! Thank your Service ..
Aside from all of Plaintiff's witnesses (including the experts) being NOT credible...I thought Plaintiff's attorneys were very poorly prepared and did a sub-par job. And yes...I'm a litigation attorney. Also, I'm very familiar with both the Montage and Deer Valley (and its World Class staff) as I go there 2-3 times a year.
Paul K , if your on linked in ,look up Minh Cox , her husband was involved in the Magician David Copperfeild Trial in Las Vegas , you might find it enlightening as a litigation attorney what happens when a trial is totally ruled by celebrity money , and Las Vegas being totally run by the Casinos . The truth will come out it’s current being reviewed by the California Barr as two of the attorneys are from California.
Im just a law student and i agree. I also wondered why they focused so much on his injuries. I know they have to prove his injuries, but isnt their case killed if they can't prove (or convince the jury) that GP CAUSED the accident ? He can be injured and still be at fault. And if he is at fault, she is not legally responsible for paying him for his injuries. So, didnt his victory dépend soley on HER being the cause?
And then, if you noticed last monday when defense got access to thr gopro link, the plaintiff lawyer Sykes, actually said: "we will stipulate no one is at fault for thr accident." Which i gathered, because he never brought it up again, that THAT was something hisbside cannot stipulate too (without, really, completely giving up their case entirely).
Just HOW could TS be entitled to any money if GP wasnt at fault for thr collision? And why wouldnt the plaintiff's attorney's spend atleast as much time in proving fault as they did with proving injury. I just don't get it. Is there a legal scenario where GP would have to pay TS for injuries she didnt cause? Make it make sense for me. Lol i beg you. Its been driving me nuts since the first day of trial after hearing plaintiff's friend/"eyewitness" testimony. And then hearing Sykes make that offer of stipulation just made me lose it. HOW could plaintiff's side possibly give up that argument, that GP was at fault for the collision and their case still survive? What were they thinking/doing? Honestly, even with TS as a client, i think I, me, still à student, could have put on a better case than his lawyers did. (I also would have felt ethically obligated to inform him that he didnt have a good or strong case, and let him now just what HE could be on the hook for if he lost, and honestly advise against a suit like this.)
@@alyssaheller7860 You are 100% correct in your points. TS should have been "counseled" from the start that he has little to zero chance by his lawyers (ethically and as a practical matter). I'm sure your law professors are teaching you now...when the "facts" are NOT favorable to your client THEN argue the "law" and vice versa. But in this case, neither the law nor the facts supported TS's case and so his "counsel" FOCUSED SOLELY on the "injured ribs" UNDER-estimating the jury's intellect hoping the severity of the ribs would take center stage and impute fault/liability on GP. This case was a NON-case from the start. IMHO TS's attorneys KNEW they would not make a dime...but did it for notoriety...lastly if there was any IOTA of merit in this case it would have SETTLED QUIETLY behind closed doors LONG AGO.
@Alyssa Heller & @Paul K. I think Terry & his lawyers were greedy. Terry went through SEVERAL lawyers until he found someone who gave him a figure he was excited about. If you watch the 2019 press conference Bob Sykes headed they said the other side offered a settlement but they felt it was “paltry “. I am glad the truth prevailed. It was a cash grab. Didn’t believe Ramon especially after watching his footage aired in the press conference in 2019 compared to his testimony. Also his lawyers lied several times in opening & throughout the trial regarding Carrie Oaks deposition. No one was saying watch me ski during the run. It was said at the top of the hill. Gwyneth was skiing opposite them and enjoying a slow run keeping pace with her young beginner skier level children.
@@paulk.4261 I read that originally GP offered to pay for his medical bills, but since he went to the VA, his bills were covered and he wanted a payout. He refused to settle, so it had to go to court. I also don't understand why his lawyers were allowed to keep saying Ramone was an eyewitness who saw the collision. Ramone testified that he heard a scream, then he looked and they were already on the ground. So he did not see the collision, but the plaintiff attorneys kept falsely claiming this. The ski instructor actually also did not see the collision, but he saw more than Ramone, that Sanderson was skiing fast across the entire run, edge to edge, and GP was skiiing slower (to keep pace with her kids more or less) only on the right side. And Sanderson was blind in his right eye. The ski instructor was a far more credible witness. It didn't help that Ramone's story changed so much and was so implausible. He left his friend face down in the snow. He didn't call the ski patrol. He skied away afterwards. All things he condemned others for doing. And Sanderson admitted in his depositions he exaggerated his symptoms to doctors to get their attention, at one point telling one that he was unconscious for ten minutes. He basically said that's what one does to get attention. Well this trial was a big attention getter, and his story changed so much from deposition to trial and even at trial. I am glad the jury came to the right decision. No GP fan myself, but that guy seemed like a grifter to me.
I love hearing from jurors hopefully more come forward these interviews are super interesting
When you go skiing, you accept a certain inherent RISK: There is a chance of getting hurt, or even worse. You can be hit by the chair lift; someone can run into you; ypo can be overtaken by an avalanche, you can catch an edge and hit a tree, and a dozen more things. These are all ACCIDENTS; and don't expect to become a millionaire.
So are car accidents.
@@danny1682 Yes and when you drive a car and you're blind on one eye and have brain damage and other body issues, there's an even greater risk that YOU would cause the accident yourself. Same thing happened here, this guy was an accident waiting to happen.
I had no idea the skis didn’t release. I must have missed that part and it explains a lot! Thankfully, a great jury got it right!
As someone who doesn’t ski, that nuance would have been lost on me. I appreciated that Sam explained it.
I love that we get to hear a juror speak out! I'm still holding onto hope for a Depp v Heard juror to speak too.
She’s a very sharp and delightful young lady 😊
I bame the ambulance chasing lawyers also. This guy AND the lawyers are shady af.
The lawyers might’ve originally believed their client.
I see your point, but also, the lawyers probably took his case on a contingency basis, so they wouldn’t get paid unless he won. To take on a defendant such as GP, who has virtually limitless financial means to hire the best lawyers and experts, they had to believe there was a very credible claim. Ultimately, the facts proved otherwise, but I don’t believe they would have sunk this much time into a case that they didn’t believe they’d be paid for.
Agree “shady AF!” I
Terry & his lawyers were greedy. Terry went through SEVERAL lawyers until he found someone who gave him a figure he was excited about. If you watch the 2019 press conference Bob Sykes headed they said the other side offered a settlement but they felt it was “paltry “. I am glad the truth prevailed. It was a cash grab. Didn’t believe Ramon especially after watching his footage aired in the press conference in 2019 compared to his testimony. Also his lawyers lied several times in opening & throughout the trial regarding Carrie Oaks deposition. No one was saying watch me ski during the run. It was said at the top of the hill. Gwyneth was skiing opposite them and enjoying a slow run keeping pace with her young beginner skier level children. Also the guy is & was “ blind “ in that right eye which he tried to minimize & had a cataract in the left. Many people realize that older bones fracture more easily. Even without a collision those ribs could have fractured from a fall and Gwyneth’s version of them ending up spooning made complete sense regarding his fractures. You can fracture ribs with hard sneezing. His lawyers repulsed me specifically Sykes “country lawyer “ 13:39 act but he grew up & still lives in the city.
@@matthewhouse2528 they thought she'd settle to make it go away.
Kudos to ALL the JURORS… A very smart young lady ❤️Thank you for your great service 😊
I would like to know what they thought of the list of travel destinations and activities he's participated in since the accident.
He was still able to travel with the assistance of his daughter. He tried and is still trying to get better.
He was injured in a fall in 2009 (which didnt involve a celebrity). Even his medical experts could not say whether his brain since 2009 until now was affected by the fall in 2016. After 2016 he continued to enjoy life - drinking, skiing, zip-lining, scuba diving, kayaking, cycling and hiking all over the world.
She said in another interview (or was it another young juror who looked like her ?) That all the traveling he did was probably the biggest, or 2nd biggest factor in their decision to see him at fault !
@@aniello4633 aren't you late for a trump rally?
@@elinorlee1539 Not a fan of Trump, never have been. What does this have to do with politics? You need help.
We need more jurors like her. Intelligent and articulate. Usually people like her are summarily dismissed from a jury pool for being too logical. It's one of many reasons I believe in professional jurys.
There is actually good reason they dont want professionals on juries. Look it up.
@@alyssaheller7860 I have and I've read it all. I still believe in professional jurys.
I think Paltrow's witnesses that were experts in brain injury had a lot to do with a decision. Also, all the Facebook posts of Terry when the picture he painted was that he couldn't do anything. He said he never skied again, yet he was on Facebook after the accident in skis.
Great job! 👍
Many years ago I was hit on my head, drove home, said good night to my parents and went to bed, the next morning I woke up in the hospital. To this day I do not remember what led to the incident, other than some details given to me through my father’s investigations, I learned from the hospital that I had been struck and had suffered head trauma which caused me to loose segments of my memory that night. That said, I do not believe the plaintiff had clear recollections of the actual collision and that he shamefully tried to capitalize on his false narrative, his behaviour leaves me to question wether this was an intentional accident on his part. Finally it’s good to see the jury made the right judgment.
Good job!
Next I’m curious to see the fate of America’s X President. Good luck and stay civil regardless the outcome.
God Bless you all.
Great interview! And so interesting about the new signs.
It’s good to see so many positive comments. It’s not an easy ask for the general public but she seems to be very switched on - well done :-)
Mr Christiansen’s testimony of the manner in which people were skiing was also pivotal.
Good job!!!
She acts star struck.
Urs, she's star struck
amazing juror. i wish she was one of the lawyers that were in this trial. she's way more easier to follow and can explain things much more articulately. thank you for patience and judgement in the trial.
They never tell you who or any details until after you’re selected. I served on a jury and I was forewoman. It’s a lot of pressure and responsibility.
Very sharp juror/jury.
Well spoken young lady
Her vocal cords were fried.
Very interesting and she of course saw what the rest of us saw. Very pleasant and good to hear the thought process behind the decision.
Gweneth wouldn’t have screamed out being the one to hit a person! But for women, having someone come up from behind, and making sounds is very scary event! Most women have been assaulted in some form or fashion. And I believe she came forward around a #metoo incident previously recorded. The facedown for minutes got me to being a retired health professional. He can’t breathe face down, and no body helps the guy, especially for his friend? Most sane ppl would call for help and 911 !
I think she could've screamed if she saw she was about to hit someone. There were multiple ppl who heard a scream, her daughter said she heard a female scream. But yet GP never said she screamed & that TS only made grunting sounds. Also, in this instance imo, it doesn't seem like it would be a good idea to move someone who's just been slammed like that as you don't know what injuries they might have. If he wasn't totally unconscious, he could've been stunned so he wasn't moving. The ski patrol was there also, so the friend prob defaulted to them at first for action. And if memory serves, it was Ramone who actually helped him up
I believe he is an eye doctor not a medical doctor. I thought when they said doctor I assume a medical doctor too till someone corrected me
@@LizzieCATs38 he was an optometrist, not a medical doctor, but there are medical doctors also known as eye doctors (opthalmologists), who can do everything an optometrist does, but also perform surgery to treat eye conditions.
Weinstein grabbed and fondled her breasts. She was dating brad pitt at the time (and he was at the height of his career at this time) and she told him. And he was furious and confronted weistein. GP only publicly spoke of this once after it came out during meetoo, (others knew of it at the time. Apparenrly BP made a huge scene because he was so angry), she just confirmé it happened and confirmed BP did what was being said he did. And she has never spoken of it again. And BP has said NOTHING about it. Which i think is very noble of him because it isnt his story to tell. Even though he stood up for and defended her.
@@kumuluskld ramone never said he helped him up, or checked on him while unconscious.
"Celebrity was not a part of it at all". I'm not convinced. First red flag, "She didn't have any reason to lie".
She's talking about some jurors being sympathetic to the plaintiff then when asked if sympathetic towards G.P. she says OH DEFINITELY so fast with her vocal fry then immediately back tracks herself. She is starstruck herself. So many comments in here praising her like she did Jesus' work... I've been seeing more and more of that on the internet towards people who either did what they were supposed to be doing anyway, or those who did nothing of substance at all..
The skis not coming off was a huge question for me as well.
Excellent juror!
Gosh just a great selection for a juror. A skier, A nice person and unprejudiced..... I'm relieved with the verdict....
Community is everything! Today is my 13th year anniversary of living in PC, UT.
Smart jury. Thank you.
Terry "I think I just got Paltrowed" Sanderson
He had minor strokes in the past, I think he had the he, was out of it and ran into GP. This juror is very bright and knew her stuff about skiing, I am so glad she was willing to come forward. Great interview!
I thought that was a possibility too. A TIA/mini stroke affecting his balance or eye again. Either way his field of view was limited & I am certain he didn’t see her.
More commercials than KUTV if that’s possible ❤
Snow skiing is dangerous and difficult for even the most fit. I hope people who go skiing will keep that in mind and carry their own insurance, which I am sure Sanderson had and has. The risk is real. Great job jury!! You made the right call. Thank you for your service.
If you happen to be on trial against a celeb someday, just forget about it. Save yourself lawyer fees and just quit and suck it up.
This was an honest disagreement (7:15 time stamp) - Hell NO!! One person was lying! Plan and simple. You can not run into someone and honestly believe they ran into you. Stop making excuses. People need to be held accountable including lying under oath.
Good job
Quite impressive interview. She is very articulate.
Looks like Dr Scher was a good and credible pick.
She's very thoughtful and intelligent.
It was a ridiculous case and I’m Guessing Terry is going to be massively out of pocket paying his - and maybe also her legal fees.
I reckon his finances will curtail his activities far more than his alleged TBI going forwards!
I think he's going to have to declare bankruptcy and will say it's Gwyneth's fault to garner sympathy.
As I understand it, his lawyers took his case on contingency. *He doesn’t owe them anything they lost money on this case* he will however, I have to pay something to Paltrow’s attorney that’s being put together now.
@@nealskrenes2612 pay "something". Lawyers cost a fortune and this case has been going on since 2016. Also, who pays for all the expert witnesses?
@@ksc743 I’m not a lawyer but _I’m given to understand if your lawyers takes a case on contingency they foot the bill for all of their witnesses. This is why they receive a large portion of any settlement._ They’ve invested time and money the court says they can recoup.
As to Paltrow’s lawyers and witnesses, they’ll submit a total expense to the court in a judgment will be made against Sanderson.
@@nealskrenes2612 I'm not either. When you say in the case of Terry's lawyers they receive a large portion of ANY settlement, I'm not sure what you mean. They don't get ANYTHING if they lose the case, right?
And Terry has to pay Gwyneth's lawyers - and her expert witnesses? I think he spent all his money on travel the past few years! Optometrists are not known to be mega-wealthy.
This is super interesting to hear what jurors thought. The sound quality on this is horrible however eek
He became fixated. court date so far out on calendar. Bless You Sir.
We love you Sarah! Also I'd love to know what watch you are using for your kids.
she says: "I think its important for the public to know..." So she doesn't think of herself as a lowly member of the public, at least, not while she's being interviewed like a stage star. And she was excited to be in the jury room, finally getting the chance to have her own say after having had to keep quiet for a whole fortnight. I wonder if the doorway will be big enough to get her inflated head through it?
Great juror. I am glad her and probably some other jurors had skiing experience.
After that first question , I paused and im not watching
It made me laugh day 1 when everyone was blaming GP.
Before they'd heard any testimony. Or evidence.
I'm very surprised nobody had a GoPro on.
This juror is awesome!
"The lawyers were the entertainment." Loved this!
She is very cute and honestly answers questions for us so we may know the rest of the story.
I’m so glad they found the bindings evidence to be the lynchpin. That is what made me pretty sure he ran into her or at least they ran into each other. Glad she (the juror) can get back to her life.
One of the things that I noticed in the trial was that Mr. Sanderson, or at least someone on his side, stated that there were hardly any people on the slope, then said there were a lot of people on the slope. 🤷🏼♀️
The reporter interviewing the juror asked a lot of stupid questions.
She must have been one of the juniors that Gwynith smiled at.