Gwyneth Paltrow Ski Crash Case Juror Speaks to Court TV
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 เม.ย. 2023
- Juror #19, Don, the foreperson of the jury spoke to Court TV's Julia Jenaé. He said the experience humanized celebrities for him when #GwynethPaltrow spoke about going skiing with her dad. He said he believed Paltrow's recollection of the crash.
#CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖️👇
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/trending/gwyn...
COURT TV IS BACK! 24/7 LIVE gavel-to-gavel coverage, in-depth legal reporting, and expert analysis of the nation’s most important and compelling trials.
WATCH COURT TV LIVE:
www.courttv.com/title/court-t...
WATCH TRIALS ON DEMAND:
www.courttv.com/programming/t...
WHERE TO WATCH:
www.courttv.com/where-to-watc...
#CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖👇
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/trending/gwyneth-paltrow-ski-crash-case/?
So we've got a bunch of completely different jurors, paying attention to different things, but they had 1 thing in common: they were all convinced that Terry was 100% at fault.
Yes, that's exactly why we have a jury of 6-12 people. And those "different things" all pointed to Terry being 100% at fault. Which he was, if you watched the trial
@@soleknight3212 People like Terry can destroy your entire live.. Just because they want to get attention.. Those are the kind of neighbors who make your life a living hell..
@@TheRealJohnHooper Agree. It's classic narcissism. But they can only make your life 'hell' if you allow it. God bless
And they got it right!
She was credible. He was not. Not even plaintiff's lawyers were credible. Wow.
Totally normal and intelligent guy with normal thoughts. Sanity exists. A breath of fresh air.
I love to see the face of Jurors. That helps to humanize them for the viewers of Court TV! Yes the jury did a fabulous job! Bravo.
The two jurors we’ve heard from seem lovely!
And they're going to meet again, according to the first one.
I'm very impressed by this juror. He explained everything so well. It helps a lot that he has experience on the slopes.
The look on his face when the verdict was read was like “I had plans for that money“.
🥲🥲🥲
And Ramone probably headed straight to a bar!
He had travel expenses to pay off lol
@@kathysawyer548 my exact thought lol, he was pissed cause he already spent it 😅
😂
man this guy just gets it lol, love his personality.
Just been watching the press conference from 2019 and you can see SO clearly how they made so much up. Ramon was talking about the incident and said Terry was FACE DOWN THE ENTIRE TIME (until he was eventually helped up after Paltrow had apparently left). So how did Terry manage to say "I'm sorry" towards anyone, as he said in his own testimony, plus all the other 10 events he recalls while being 'unconscious' the entire time?
What! Where did u find the press conference?! I’ve looked but can’t find it!
@@Sassyglbeauty Just Google "press conference Terry ..." and it will automatically come up before you even put his surname in
@@Kate-ds5db thanks! I finally found it. Looks like it wasn’t uploaded when I originally was looking for it. I mean, the story didn’t even make sense back then! It’s also very telling that he had many attorneys turn him down.
@@Sassyglbeauty I provided the link above. The smoking guns for me are 1) Ramon clearly states in that presser segment, that Paltrow and co had all left, apart from Deer Valley guy, while Terry was STILL face down in the snow. 2) Ramon is the one who says the same guy was "yelling" at Terry while he was face down in the snow. Fast forward to the trial and Terry suddenly announces in his testimony, in great detail, how the Deer Valley guy was "yelling" at him and Terry was saying "I'm sorry, I'm sorry". But, remember, he's *face down* in the snow :)
@@soleknight3212 I wonder if Terry and Ramone had some kind of financial agreement.
Hope you’ll release the full interview.. this juror is great, speaks what he thinks, very honest!
You can speak what you think, and be completely wrong. You know that right? Just because someone talks the way you like, doesn't mean they are correct. Gawd you people daft.
@@Dunning.Kruger of course! we can differ in opinions on the facts presented in this case.. I could also be a horrible person and call you daft too just cuz our opinions differ 🤷🏻♀️
@@MellowWell0w There's no difference of opinion on this case if one watched the trial. Paltrow was telling the truth 100% and Terry was at fault 100%.
@@soleknight3212 💯 👍
@@soleknight3212 Yeap I agree with you.. but @Dunning Kruger don’t seem to think so
It makes me nuts when the person announces the verdict stumbles their words. You have ONE job!
Yes. I cringe every time I hear it.
Agree, happens everytime! From OJ to Alex Murdaugh.
SERIOUSLY!!!!!!!!!
Agree. One isn't that bad but three is too much.
Omg! “we’re not here for Habitat for Humanity”. Love this.
so far all of the jurors interviewed intelligent, articulate, accurate, spot on. Appreciate seeing/hearing their opinions. I have served on 5 juries including a 9 week trial----people have no idea how difficult and a responsibility it is unless through the process!
What a great juror. Glad to hear his story.
She could have counter sued for multi-millions instead of $1 and would win and take everything he owns. The Terry guy should actually be relieved she didn't do that.
Someone laughed at GP could have hired these million dollar attorneys. It's expensive, but less than it could have been. Sanderson is lucky she didn't.
And he didn't appreciate that. Said she won because she is an actress and a celebrity. Very narcisstic
Nope, that would be bad and not worth it for her.
She would have to show for damage and the subsequent potential lost income from the "damage", this is big hurdle and she would really have hard time to prove it.
Second, public opinion wouldn't be as favourable if she countersued for financial damage.
@@dalfifran7572 Uh, nope. She asked for $1 and got it, the full amount she ask for. Had she been asking for more, she would have gotten whatever the full amount was, the jury decided that.
@@phototristan That's not how it works. Yeah, she got $1 because it's negligeble amount. But not if (as you suggested) she asked for multi-million instead.
If she... infact ask for multi-million compensation, then Gwyneth would have to show her potential lost income and financial damage to justify the number she asked, just like Terry, and Gwyneth would look dumb to ask for multi million dollar when she didn't suffer any significant injury and neither she suffer lost income.
She would have to disclose all the financial she got over the coming years, and after the incident to show the number. It's not worth it. it would only make her look like greedy bastard and absolute a-hole celebrity.
It's already PR nightmare in the first place before it even goes to trial if she did that.
What a wonderful soul, a good guy
This juror was definitely a good people reader
At :36 when they're reading the verdict you can hear someone say "Nice!" Lol
Its called common sense, this man makes up his own mind with facts and gut feeling .
I knew it was just a money grab when damage amount went from 3 mil to 300,000.
And he sued the ski resort ... Definitely just reaching for deep pockets.
Read how that transpired.
Good job juror!!!!👏👏
I believe the verdict was correct. However, I do feel sorry for TS as he clearly is convinced of his version of events. Memory can be malleable, and if your memory doesn’t line up with your end goal (compensation) you may be even more likely to bend the recollection. His biggest downfall was pursuing this lawsuit while blissfully traveling the world. Nothing wrong with that except it shows you aren’t as permanently injured as you would like people to believe.
It was not a mistake to have traveled though, because 1) it would not have changed the outcome of the trial, he was going to lose anyway with the rest of the evidence, and 2) he cannot waste time anymore, he needed to enjoy the rest of his life right now, not 7 years later, so that was a wise decision. To him, time is way more precious than money.
You feel sorry for him even after trying to extort her for $30,000,000?
what a genuine sounding dude
Would love to watch his entire interview. They did a great job
We absolutely need fair minded jurors who will stand up for what’s right to be chosen as jurors.
The plaintiffs lawyer is a complete joke and has a well known reputation for suing police officers and insurance companies. The only reason Sykes took this case was because he thought Paltrow would settle and he would get a huge payout. I think he was taken back when she declined to settle and he had to throw together a case that had no merit or truth. I'm glad the jury saw this case for what it was, a huge money grab. Bob Sykes needs to go!! It's lawyers like him that leave a bad taste in your mouth.
Am I the only one who heard the camera man in the beginning saying “sweet” and “nice” after the verdict is read 😂😂😂
That was Owens the defendants lawyer who said that.
Dude you need to learn how media and audio-visual sound system works, buddy. That was clearly Gwyneth Paltrow's lawyer..🤦🏻♀️
Great juror!!
Hardly.
@@Dunning.Kruger did you watch the trial? Probably not. You’re probably a troll without any knowledge about the case. Go sit down.
Good interview 👍
blind in one eye , can't see out the other , i know , let's go skiing , what could go wrong ? .
The cray GENE is very strong and his family you can tell his daughters both inherited it
@@deadmanswife3625is this guy a full blown narcissist or a male gold digger? or both ? .
@@robertwoods3750 honestly I can't figure him out because I don't know all those psychological terms but he seems deep within his own little reality like he has never really connected with anyone genuinely in his whole entire life. Otherwise you would think he would be embarrassed in the same for the simple country lawyer who claims he does know how to read but could not read the writing on the wall before he agreed to this ridiculous trial. I mean when I saw him putting his arm around Terry and then again as they were leaving I just couldn't make sense of the guy
"If something goes wrong, I'll just sue the organization, that will finance my future trips abroad."
@@deadmanswife3625 the lawyer had nothing to lose and everything to gain in bringing this suit , he wins =big money , he loses , he'll still get a lot of publicity and possible future clients , I'm not Jordan Peterson but from what I've gathered , a narcissist is someone who thinks only in terms of themselves and how to keep the spotlight on them . I've never met a full blown narcissist but i've met people who have a lot of narcissistic traits .
This juror is awesome. Seems totally fair and was present for that entire trial. I believe the right verdict was delivered, no brainer, after watching the whole trial myself… I only wish and hope for all jurors in cases to be as cool and focused as this one was!
I would speak too and get my bag! I love hearing from jurors
Awesome smart juror. Genuine guy. Good job.
So he didn't pay particular attention to the evidence, but just the vibe that he got and how he read people? 😮
Yep. Ugh. 🙄
Uh... that's not what he said. He knew the details of the case
When I was a juror we were not allowed to take notes. You could write down your thoughts during breaks. I believe that’s how it was also in the Murdaugh trial.
Exactly!
The real question is why Sanderson was skiing that run, where children are learning ow to ski. If he's such a good skier was, he showing off?
My opinion... he was stalking Paltrow
It's gratifying to see how competent the jurors apparently were. Same with the Alec Murdough case. It bodes well for our jury system.
My immediate reaction upon first seeing this juror was omg, is he homeless? Lol, turns out he's very intelligent and articulate. However, he seemed very sure of himself. Judging people by body language might be a thing but it is too often pseudo-science and should not be a reason for determining guilt or innocence.
OMG and yet you judged him by how he looks to start with, but fold his judgment on him, reading the body, language of others! WOW can you say hypocrite much??
@@ZenDreaming60 join right in judging the original poster I'll join you. Let's all judge one another why not judge not lest you be judged so you judge me and then I'll judge you fair enough? I love it
totally agree with you
@@deadmanswife3625 The only judge round these here parts is Judge Holmberg.
🙄 oh please … thanks for nothing Inezz… this foreman had unbelievable insight and knowledge from using plain old common sense. Terry Sanderson was/ is a self serving nut job from the get go and I’m sure the people who know him in real life aren’t surprised that he jumped Gwyneth on the slopes for a money grab. Sit down, please… and stop judging people from how they look on the outside. You’re old enough to know better !
OMG the clerk sounds SO nervous... totally flubs the reading of a very simple jury form
She had one job
How long was the jury deliberating? Anybody? They did a great job!
I believe it was 2 hours and 40 minutes, if I remember correctly
Actually, they came to their decision in 20 minutes but are required to ‘deliberate’ - at least take - two hours.
@@NoExperienceRequired that included, lunch
@@charrielyn1231 Yes - it took them less than 20 minutes to say Gwyneth was not at fault, but it took additional time to discuss damages to be awarded, as some were more sympathetic to Sanderson than others.
I like this jurer he thinks for himself and that's what you have t do.
All you americans "think for yourself" despite being completely wrong lmao... my gawd.
I don't understand why the jurors who are speaking out are not clearly stating anything about how obvious the lies were getting exposed throughout the case. Are they not allowed to state the elephant in the room? It's like they are tiptoeing around stating this. I think it would be refreshing to hear someone say what we're all thinking.
Outstanding juror! He didn't get caught up in all the noise this case had and thought logically.. Fact is, you can't sue someone for old age...
*If Terry had collided with the average person, would he have sued..? I highly doubt it.. He sued for money & fame..
Gwyneth did a good job with her reaction. To me, she looked relieved, but not smug.
Love this guy!
I hope the jurors will say nothing. Sanderson has already been talking about filing an appeal, and it's better not to give Sanderson any encouragement by giving him something to seize on in his own deranged mind.
That won’t effect it. All an appeal does is look for errors in judicial rulings. Not the jurors decisions.
Only if they can ~convincingly~ argue jurors made findings of fact not based on evidence, but sympathy and such. Good luck with that.
I'm gonna say it now. It will never ever go to appeal.
Don you are so rad.
It would’ve been a good idea to have the woman who read the jury’s verdict practice first.
Awesome juror!
At 0:55 was that an EVP?? or someone actually speaking? When she said “one dollar” you can hear a man whisper “NICE!”
I appreciate his realness, and I trust the decision made by this jury. The 2 jurors who spoke up so far really are impressive people. He is awesome. 👏 👏 👏 I was fooled by Mr Sanderson based on my own personal experience, but mine was authentic. 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅 Mr Sanderson was not being honest.
Better juror interview that the other girl. I wish they would’ve asked him more questions.
She was great as well.
Terry had some terrible lawyers.. I do feel for him. I think he sued the wrong person. He should have sued the ski😢 employee and employer for how the incident was handled.
They needed to have someone else read the results. The person that read them did a terrible job!
She should sue him for damages..
This man is 🥇🏆
Awesome dude
I wanna go and meditate over a beer with this guy 😊
Knew there would have to be some skiers on jury and it would count against Terry.
"Then you just get expert opinions." Yeah, you don't want your evaluation of the evidence to get bogged down in anything factual.
Expert witnesses aren't necessarily factual. They are hired guns to say/ create a version that helps the side that is paying them.
@@jenrich2404 True. Expert witnesses are offering an opinion based on other facts presented to them. That's whu two experts can take the same set of facts and come to clearly opposite opinions.
Yes, he was a great juror.
Justice served.
Unlucky Terry.
No more jet-setting around the world a week or 2 after it happened and spent a year doing extreme sports etc.
Nice attempt at a grift there, had it not been Paltrow, he wouldn't have attempted to take her to trial.
So I hope he enjoys camping in his backyard.
Because 6 years of Paltrow's legal fees and experts is going to run into the millions, and he's got to pay all of that. 😂
Plus 1 dollar. 😂
the juror shamelessly admits he didn't pay any attention to the evidence, but just went on his "feel" of the parties. luckily, he got the right answer, even if for the wrong reasons.
What’s wrong with the person doing verdict?
“We’re not here for habitat for humanity.” 😂
Great outcome
He said...She said.
Crazy case!
Terry's world-wide travel really messed with his credibility!
A person traveling that much and engaging in so many demanding if not risky sports is not somebody who have been permanently injured.
I want to see all the jurors
He was trying to be a money grabber
“Not dissing on anyone’s law degrees or anything” hahahahaha
My God, who was that fruit basket reading questions to the juror? She could not read one sentence correctly.
There are more sane, rational, thinking people in the world than many believe there are. These televised trials prove that. It is so interesting hearing the reasons why jurors reach their conclusions, whether we agree with them or not. Sometimes hearing their rationales can change a non-juror's mind.
I completely agree.
4:50 Talk about trying to get inside someone's head. Mission accomplished as this juror definitely misspoke at 04:50 when he says: "He seems to really enjoy when people say positive things about me." He says "me", but meant 'him' (Sanderson).
Excellent interview. What stuck with me was his BIG RADIUS TURNS AND “HE SAID”….he was coming towards her and she was on his LEFT. That would make Paltrow in the front on the downhill and Sanderson coming up behind her! Simple! NO BODY BROUGHT THAT UP OR CHALLENGED Sanderson on that statement.
You are incorrect. GP’s lawyer brought it up on Wednesday at the end of Terry’s redirect owen’s read Terry’s deposition ON THE RECORD with regards to last 10 seconds before impact. Owens’s is smart. He did this so he could use it in his closing in conjunction with the animation video. What Terry said in his dep was that he was tentative of a woman skier (not GP) who had passed him earlier . Now he is making large turns down the hill and picking up some speed . He is now cutting across the slop from the left toward the right side when his becomes aware of that woman skiing down the middle of the run. He said he didn’t want to hit her so he was tentative of her. Again this is not GP. He said he needed to get passed her, so as he came close to her, he passed inches behind her.(she was able to go down the hill untouched). But as Terry was so focused on her toward his left and with vision only in left eye. He then, a second or so later hit GP in her back, on the right side of the run. He was going about 45 deg Angle across and GP just happen to be facing 45 deg towards the right at the time she was making her slow smaller turns on the right side run. This case was all about timing. Just like Terry, instead he COULD HAVE hit that woman skier instead of GP. If he had I don’t think he would have sued her, unless she was worth millions too. I know he wouldn’t take responsibility for it because as we all found out in this trial, he blame’s everyone else for all his problems. I’m glad GP won against this fraud!!!
I don’t understand why the jurors are speaking. During the Jonny deep trial they told jurors are forbidden to talk after the trial . Why this is different?
💯 agree that the little things matter. He clearly knows his way on a slope and so that knowledge was important. Body language can be misinterpreted though and it must be a little disheartening for both sides if expert testimony is given less importance - considering the costs involved.
If if there would not have been an email sent by the plaintiff with a link to a video that no longer exists he may have won
This guy will go viral…cool dude.
Prayer makes you glow.. like this cool guy
I like how the juror didn’t consider that beautiful women (& famous) are often approached in harassing ways. I’m sure that’s why they have security guards when they can.
The Jurors got it right this time!
Who reads verdicts? They always fumble with their words.
The jury foreman looks a lot like an actor I've seen in some TV shows/series. They were sitcoms but don't remember the name of the shows or actor's name, it was long ago.
Sanderson is a kook. Too bad Paltrow had to even go to court.
Shocking!!!! 😅😅😅
Glad it's over. Waste of time. She is a nice lady. Tries to stay healthy and they constantly criticize her. Why? She is real not like the Kardashians. Good actress and I am sure pleasant to be around.
Somebody hire this man as as a jury selection expert stat. _we’re not here for habitat for humanity_ 😂 this is going to be my go to statement from now on
Great Juror! Same here, listening to expert witness, focused, memorable are the little things & body language are important factors. Take key point notes, not descriptive notes. You may miss extremely important testimony when focused on “note taking”. Some Judges do not allow Jurors to take notes at all…
looks like Sanderson didn't maintain his legal skiing down the hill line when he collided with Paltrow.
PLEASE STOP beating a dead horse! I am so sick of hearing about this case. It is OVER.
good dude
I'm impressed by him
I really like this guy!!! He’s funny & smart!!!
What a nice guy!
Everyone likes being praised. So what
He said she skied down and went and got a massage
The Court TV’s commentator’s comment, “Great juror, I know WHY he was the foreperson” is embarrassing considering Court TV was the prime media organization approved to record the trial live!! Did he MISS their own LIVE COVERAGE of the foreperson being RANDOMLY selected from a DRAWING of all the the jurors by number??😂
That was a great juror, except for him saying he’d trust his instinct, not the law. He used both to decide this case, and that is good. But, you have to allow the law to make its case too. Or else don’t sit on juries. I actually thought Terry was at fault and caused his own injuries. None of his experts heard the other perspective, so they shouldn’t have judged, just offered their opinions. This is one case where the person at fault received the greater injury. That’s not usual. But clearly this guy was at a disadvantage before he got his skis on that day.
Cripes 7 minutes of my life wasted.