BEST Film for Night Photography? Cinestill 800T vs Portra 800

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @gackal1982
    @gackal1982 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    foe those going all out home developing, i strongly suggest buying bulk vision 3 and load it yourself, you can wash off the remjet with a baking soda solution then process as c41, much cheaper as of aug 2023 when a roll of cinestill is 15+ dlls then 20+ for develop and scan this hobby is expensive

  • @Vilmos60
    @Vilmos60 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Tungsten is the metal what the glowing filament in incandescent lamps is made of. So T-films have the best color balance under the yellowish light of traditional incandescent light bulbs. Similarly Kelvin-rated LEDs may cause weird things as their light is mixed of various wavelengths, while tungsten has a clean spectrum.
    Great video and was fun to watch... 😊 Thank you!

  • @BenjoC8632
    @BenjoC8632 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My favorite film for night photography is actually Portra 400. It still produces a beautiful, more subtle light halation, along with slightly reduced contrast, I’ve had great success with it at night

  • @finn4240
    @finn4240 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    0:10 woah woah dont forget my baby girl lomography 800

  • @xtiandank
    @xtiandank ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Star Wars sequel trilogy joke killed me. This was a great vid. I plan to try out both of these soon.

    • @Overexposed1
      @Overexposed1  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Christian! Love me some Star Wars. Happy shooting!

  • @gregpantelides1355
    @gregpantelides1355 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for your excellent review. Keep shooting and stay inspired!

  • @imitdiu
    @imitdiu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love how you say Hey-lation

    • @Overexposed1
      @Overexposed1  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait til you hear me talk about oil changes.

  • @pancakelens75
    @pancakelens75 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Lomo 800 is an equally brilliant film for night photography

  • @Pysees868
    @Pysees868 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Your video was fun to watch, good feedback on each film. I agree with your assessment, Portra looks more realistic, but Cinestill looks more creative.

    • @Overexposed1
      @Overexposed1  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you April! Glad you liked it!!!

  • @qwikflame
    @qwikflame ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good review of the two! i'm still trying to figure out the best way to use 800T with the pro-mist filter.

  • @TimothyMathews
    @TimothyMathews 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Daylight is 5600K. As some says "At least outside the Kodak headquarters in Rochester." I've shot Vision 2 motion picture film as a film student and would love to try some Vision 3. I used 50D in daylight and 500T inside with hot tungsten halogen Mole Richardson lights.

  • @HolyFamilyHermit
    @HolyFamilyHermit 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which is best for a wedding reception at night indoors?

    • @cap2redstudio
      @cap2redstudio 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'd say because you will want natural skin tones go with Portra 800

  • @s0972821
    @s0972821 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like LOMOGRAPHY 800.

  • @azielperez4400
    @azielperez4400 ปีที่แล้ว

    When using cinestill, would you use flash during the night to get that red look or would you just shoot it without flash?

  • @oliviabonnamour3311
    @oliviabonnamour3311 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about shooting indoor during daytime, portraits for instance? Which film would your recommend?

    • @Overexposed1
      @Overexposed1  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Portra 800 - with the caveat that if the indoor lights are tungsten balanced, Cinestill could still work.

  • @markmdn6307
    @markmdn6307 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A lot of information. You are doing great!

  • @areallyrealisticguyd4333
    @areallyrealisticguyd4333 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    personally I find 800t colors to be a bit bland unless you're shooting only neon. The better contenders would probably be Portra 800 and Lomo 800 for more general low light use. Occasionally you can still find Fuji 800 when disposables are in stock

  • @Fauxbourg
    @Fauxbourg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Silbersalz also makes tungsten balanced 35mm film. :)

    • @Overexposed1
      @Overexposed1  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s the same thing. Just vision 3 500T. There are several people doing the Cinestill thing now and repackaging Vision 3 film. Doomo made makes one as well, Reflex 800T, but it’s all the same stuff.

    • @Fauxbourg
      @Fauxbourg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Overexposed1 Not quite, Silbersalz still has the remjet layer and has to be developed in ECN-2. But yes, it is essentially Vision 3 of course.

  • @TarrelScot
    @TarrelScot ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice comparison. In your experience, should Cinestill be shot at 800 or 500 for better results?

    • @Overexposed1
      @Overexposed1  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I almost always shoot it at box speed. I’m usually shooting the stuff at night though and need the speed!

  • @jonny141
    @jonny141 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like slide film for night-photos.

  • @allenthecreative
    @allenthecreative ปีที่แล้ว

    I seen you’re from Eastern Kentucky and you had some shots in Louisville by my studio. I own Hype Studios Production here. You should come by sometime. I shoot 99% film and got a lot of toys as well.

  • @BboyGraphicx
    @BboyGraphicx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brilliant

  • @pierrecrampagne6826
    @pierrecrampagne6826 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Avec la pellicule du petit amateur, on arrive a faire beaucoup, mais avec la pellicule du professionnel, on arrive à avoir les couleurs et les ambiances et aussi une certaine qualité. Que ce soit du négatif ou de la diapositive. A partir du moment où on reste avec le couplage vitesse diaphragme, sans aller aux limites du couplage, on aura de très bons résultats. Avec une très bonne pellicule, voir que les couleurs avec le temps ne virent pas dans le papier ou le film, et avoir toujours de bonnes couleurs, pareil pour la diapositive. Pour le film type
    lumière artificielle, sans aucun filtre, on aura aussi de l'ambiance sans aucune dominante pour l'incandescence. Si pour une raison vous devez faire des photos en lumière du jour, mettre un filtre lumière du jour, et le laisser le temps de faire le reste ou la pellicule entière, sans cela forte dominante bleue. Si vous revenez à l'incandescence sans le filtre, à côté d'une fenêtre, vous comprendrez ce que je veux dire.

  • @BenGibsSr
    @BenGibsSr ปีที่แล้ว

    Win-Win for Kodak...

  • @tompoynton
    @tompoynton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lol it’s not even a contest