The idea of tracing Y-chromosome genetics back to a bottleneck through Noah and the biblical flood involves a combination of theology and genetics. From a scientific perspective, the genetics of the Y-chromosome, passed down from father to son, allows researchers to trace paternal lineages over many thousands of years. However, the notion of a global bottleneck event as described in the story of Noah's flood does not align with current genetic evidence. Y-chromosome genetics shows clear markers of population bottlenecks, but these are associated with various points in human evolutionary history. For example, genetic studies indicate that human populations experienced a bottleneck around 70,000 years ago, likely linked to the Toba super volcanic eruption, which reduced human numbers dramatically. Other smaller bottlenecks can be tied to migrations out of Africa and regional population collapses. The concept of all modern males descending from a single man (as would be implied by Noah) is not supported by genetic data. While Y-chromosome Adam-the most recent common ancestor of all living male humans through the Y-chromosome-did exist, estimates place his existence around 200,000 to 300,000 years ago, far earlier than any timeline proposed for Noah's flood (usually around 4,000-5,000 years ago in biblical chronology). Furthermore, if a bottleneck as severe as the one described in the Noah narrative had occurred within the last few thousand years, we would expect to see clear genetic evidence across both paternal and maternal lines in human populations today, including reduced genetic diversity. However, the genetic diversity in modern humans suggests no such recent bottleneck. In short, while the Y-chromosome can provide a fascinating window into human ancestry and history, the evidence does not support a genetic bottleneck through Noah and the flood. Instead, human genetics points to much older and broader population dynamics.
@@francesmunro9560 Meaning that he already has his conclusions before his “research,” and he will try to make his research fit those conclusions rather than the other way around. Fairly typical of young-earth creationist types to ignore the mountains of evidence against their position in favor of a few, and often incorrectly interpreted, things that pass through their confirmation-bias filters.
@@francesmunro9560Hell, in the very first line of the video, the person said that “evolutionists” haven’t come up with anything new since Darwin. This is massively misinformed.
I have rarely heard so many unsupported and vague claims in one sitting. Let's just have one claim and look at the evidence for and against. There are also some attempts to sweep whole tranches of counter evidence under the carpet.
I read his book Traced and very good book, I would recommend to anyone who interested in the origin of the major people Group of the world he genetically traced the origins of 300 volunteers and there are links in the book to all the research for technically minded to explore.
@@merrym72veetee12 I think the actual answer is TH-cam doesn’t recommend longer content. It seems to me that the shows with the longer conversations are most popular.
@@katiek.8808 maybe. I know I tend to go for shorter, to the point talks, and get irritated by shows with a lot of “waffling” and distracting chit-chat😁
Genetically tracing dna and mapping geo-temporal distributions of different peoples are nothing new. If parts of the geo-temporal mapping align with some descriptions in the bible, that just means that the bible captured these parts of human history. That doesn't confirm the biblical descriptions of supernatural narratives. But sounds like he is having fun with his research. Good for him. As a researcher (though not a biologist), I feel excited for him.
I find it very telling when things are deliberately cast aside and not explored and I think we're in a time now that people will be more understanding to this sort of thing thanks to the various global events. They can't plug this despite how they will surely invent a new narrative and push from media etc. The game's up
Ok, I have something for you. This is something that everyone who thinks evolution is real, HATES! If you present an answer on a math test without showing the work, the answer is automatically wrong, but not so with evolution. 'They' can not actually show evolution work - at any level. There is a protocol, "ask a professor", that I have been using for years. When I ask this question, the only answer I get is that evolution has been proven for many years. Q: Please show where one species mutates to another, AND can no longer mate with it's previous type, AND produces a viable offspring. - No one seems to have an answer to this. The only thing I get is an emotionally over-reaction type, defensive answer, without knowledge (what I call "Emotional Override"). Try that, and see what goofy answers you get.
@@captaingaza2389 A straight line of descent showing the offspring having a birth defect, that offspring having it's own offspring with that birth defect in place, and then their offspring being another species. A random fossil with no direct bloodline is simply a birth defect that proves absolutely nothing. Who is the parents and offspring of your fossil? If you don't have them, then you cannot claim that a species changed into another species. All you have is an unscientific made-up guess.
@@captaingaza2389 Ring species are speciation. They may answer this guy's challenge, but they do nothing to show how all life evolved from a microbe. The notion that all life evolved from a microbe is 19th century mythology that can 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 be believed by faith with no support from modern molecular biology.
@@captaingaza2389I think ring species are an argument for why our classification system sucks and going by kind is better. This is just adhoc explanation to continue the evolution theory which is the entire history of evolution as an origin.
If you think Adam and Eve were the first and only parents of all Humanity, how did they get to be grandparents ? It’s called inbreeding and you can’t build an entire species like that without doing major damage to the genetic pool. What’s the answer to that written in the Bible ?
"Helping you stand for truth in a world that falls for lies." The fact that this is coming from a bunch of a creationists trying to debunk science is HILARIOUS! 😆
i have watched quite a few of dr jeanson's videos and the "actual" research he is doing is extraordinary and exciting, instead of the continuing bogus narrative pushed by the scientific community.
Editing out the gaps and pauses makes this impossible to watch. You seem to do this on your other videos as well and I struggle to digest what's being said. I would love to learn more however this is too frustrating to watch.
i love you family. also, i like the name. its just that family... we fight for all goodness and everyone when we fight for Yahushua HaMashiach, our Adon. thank you for what you do. expose what is not. we are already without excuse but it is good to take away what is not
It looks like something went wrong with editing? It's really an awesome research, but too difficult to follow when edited like this. Please don't be afraid to lose viewers by have a more slowed down conversation.
If evolution is true, then God (if she exists) is a big awesome marvelous intelligent elegant God. If creation ( as it is told in the bible) is true, then God is a simple, small God.
Great show guys, a better background would help though 😄👍😉 maybe a more "Conservative Biblical Scientific Background"... so you can appeal more the unsaved 😉
"And now, now that we have the bible to say, 'What are the right answers? . . . " As opposed to creation science before, when we didn't have the bible? What are you saying here?
I'd like to share an elemental concept needed for understanding creation in my video 'Sound reason ' , consistent with Scripture and electrical processies God bless you and your work
Il est écrit : le monde gît sous la puissance du malin, satan le serpent ancien. DIEU CRÉA LE CIEL LA TERRE. IL CREA L'HOMME A SON IMAGE. IL CREA ADAM ET EVE. IL CREA LES ANIMAUX. IL EST ÉCRIT : ON NE SE MOQUE PAS DE DIEU. BEAUCOUP SE SONT MOQUES DE LUI, ILS ONT EU LEUR RÉCOMPENSE.
@@wardraven8755 prouver quoi ? Je n'ai pas besoin de justifier quoique ce soit. Hors de Jésus-Christ, point de salut. Il Est la lumière du monde, des nations . Toutes choses Lui sont soumises. Ce que j'ai écrit, est écrit. Celui qui croira et qui sera baptisé sera sauvé, celui qui ne croira pas sera condamné. Vous ne pourrez pas dire, quand vous le verrez face à face que vous n'avez jamais entendu parler de Lui, Dieu, l'Éternel des armées, Maître et Créateur de toutes choses.
This man talks a lot without actually saying anything. The point is supposed to be what exactly? That he can "prove" history / historical events through DNA markers?
Do you know about the Y chromosome? Only men have one. Every man gets an exact copy of his father's Y chromosome, except that mutations occasionally creep in and accumulate. By comparing Y chromosomes from men around the world, he can figure out who descended from whom. He built a tree of "common descent" (which very inconveniently points back to one man at about the time of Noah). By examining the data he can see where peoples migrated, who descended from whom and he's verifying oral histories that had been dismissed.
@@KenJackson_US and i can say with confidence that he will never find a Y chromosome from god as a being of energy can’t make a person with dna nor can he have sex with a person that has dna to create a baby.
I really appreciate all you've done. It may be 90 years late based on hi jacking what was initially creationism to begin with as textualism methodology Christian objectivism proper tuned weights and measure guided issac newton and everything we've done that matters in science and of course reading rocks that cried out archeology Is rooted in it. How the courts work under activism is just as antithetical to its own origin English law influenced by Moses commandments and not physical lawisms or stochastic platonic approach like republic or congress would. Its like flipping intellectualism for intelligence under umbrella terms mythological notions of time that's not found on evolution. Just like climate change it has no directives no prediction power . The bible has & still does daily
I’m sorry I couldn’t continue listening to this very interesting conversation because you are all talking SO fast that I couldn’t follow what you’re saying. I’m someone well versed in creation science topics but still struggled to follow you as a Brit, where we talk much slower and deliberately. Our American cousins talk so fast it’s like drinking from a fire hose. Sorry to have missed it. 😢
it would be a awesome presentation if the speaker would talk a little slower, he runs all his statements together, very little value if you can not absorb the information.!
@@appaloosa42 without rewatching, did you retain anything at all they said? the whole comments section is saying the same thing Just trying to grasp what's being talked about
@@WS-nj7nq Jeanson explains details of his statistical studies of male DNA mutations that lead back to 3 progenitors. Difficult to comprehend if you’ve not previously encountered his work, if one has it’s like cliffs notes… you can Ace a test but remember no details.
So you are trying to prove that everything boils down to Noah because there were 8 people? If i got that correctly. Does it ever occur to you that we come from the same species naturally?
Certainly there are Christians who do real science. Creation scientists have a different problem than Christian scientists, in that they often try to lead the evidence rather than follow the evidence. This is not to say that real science can't come form creation scientists but they have to show their work and put it up for peer review. There is nothing wrong with believing the bible is completely true and attempting to make an intellectual case for that belief in order to claim actual knowledge rather than belief. As a skeptic, I would certainly welcome such an intellectual case were it doesn't even have to be 100% but rather a case for the most important bits of the bible and it doesn't even have to be all of the important bits, just one single, crucial bit that should it be true would cause many to flock to Christianity.
When you admit to throwing out demonstrable evidence which doesn't comport with your anecdotal stories in a 1000's year old book, that's not science, that's cognitive dissonance!
@@CelticSpiritsCoven Cognitive dissonance is a psychological state of discomfort that occurs when a person's beliefs, values, or actions are contradictory or inconsistent. Please provide an example of a belief, value, or action of atheism are contradictory or inconsistent.
@@JayBandersnatch Nothing for no reason doesn't create everything out of nothing. Atheists in their cult bubble don't want to admit that the tenets of their cult dogma flies in the face of reality. Just like all other extreme cult groups. Brainwashed. Cognitive dissonance on full display. Chaos doesn't create order. Natural Selection, Time, and Chance (non-physical things) seem to have the magical powers of God. So God can't be real, but those non-physical things can do his magic? Maybe someday you will realize that the reason you allowed yourself to be brainwashed into your cult is because you simply don't want to have a God that limits what sins you can do. So you deny reality and go deeper into the dogma.
@@JayBandersnatch Nothing doesn't, for no reason, create everything so precise from nothing. Cognitive dissonance denying reality is what your c*lt does.
@@JayBandersnatch "I don't want a God that limits what sins I can do, therefore I claim he doesn't exist". Cognitive dissonance. Wishing something out of existence.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. OK I could live with that if 'heavens' means everything apart from the earth. v3. God created light, separated it from darkness and thus made the first day. This is poetic but surely the heavens include the sun? Ah well maybe it'll be clear later. v14. God made two great lights... He also made the stars. Hang on, what are the heavens then if not the universe filled with stars? How on earth was there day and night (or any light) without the sun? And the day before this vegetation grew presumably without sunlight - or was it the mysterious daylight created before the sun? This account must need heavy interpretation to make any sense at all. Why?
The light of God was the first light - you know, before he created the stars and the sun. Many plants are buried in soil when planted (no exposure to light) but start growing. There are other plants that grow without any exposure to light.
@@CelticSpiritsCoven Thank you for your reply. When I hear an interpretation like yours I think, "Then why not say, 'The light of God illuminated the earth on the first day. Thus the earth was able to bring forth vegetation of all kinds by this glorious light even before the sun and moon existed.'" God needs to give us thickies a fighting chance!
@@johnpritchard8946 Another way to interpret is to look more closely at the time-line. There was light (which God called "day"). The darkness he called "night". The text does not state that light illuminated the earth. "Evening" and "Morning" is simply the transition from one way or the other.
V14 is descriptive, not chronological. That's the way each section is structured: first the active creation event which characterises the epoch, then adding details and describing the purpose. In this case, the heavenly bodies already exist, according to verse 1. What does verse 2 say? It describes that at the surface of the earth it was dark (and that it had no "form" from outside perspective) and shifts the perspective of the observer (God's Spirit) from the broader universe to the surface. Job 38 provides more details when God answers Job out of the storm and describes the sea during creation as having clouds its garment and it being "swaddled" in thick darkness... The thick and dark atmosphere didn't allow the light of the sun, moon and stars to reach the surface and made the shape of the planet hard to discern. You then see the gradual clearing described in further passages: V3, enough light penetrates to determine day from night. V6, the clouds are separated from the surface (and "clear" atmosphere exists between them) and the water cycle begins V9, dry land and vegetation appears, which accelerate the clearing / filtering of the atmosphere V14, finally the sun, moon and stars become visible and can function in their purpose, giving light on the earth and marking signs and seasons. Note that the the phrase "And there was evening, and there was morning" mark the ending of one epoch and the beginning of another... And the seventh "day" doesn't have an end marked. Because it is still ongoing. That's what I see the passage saying when examined in light of the whole of scripture and comparing the book of nature to the book of God.
@@stephenkeen6044 Thank you for your reply. I understand how you interpret these verses but I still find them odd. For example the vault of the sky created in v6 between the waters above and the waters below is referred to again in v14 when God created lights in the vault of the sky. But the sun and moon aren't between waters. I guess you could say its only their light that's in the sky or they only appear that way from the surface. But why not say so, "Now the sun was a great distance from the earth so it appeared in the sky the same size as the moon and neither were below the waters above though their light was everywhere even to the waters below and the surface of the earth." Culturally I like most of Christianity especially as it is in the NT but I keep finding problems in the bible that need interpreting. I'm glad I'm not in a Muslim country though.
It's apparent that you have NEVER READ ( nor understood / Daniel 10:21; 12:10; Prov. 28:4-7; I Cor. 15:33-34 / King James Bible ONLY! ) ... I Cor. 2:1-16; Rom. 8:5-13; Prov. 13:13; Amos 9:10; John 9:31; Heb. 7:26!! ... I'm not surprised. ... Revelation 17:1-18:24!! ... also: Ezekiel 2:1-3:27; 13:1-23; 18:1-32; 20:1-22:31; and 33:1-3311 ... I Tim. 6:3-10; Luke 6:24-26; II Cor. 11:3-4, 13-15; II Peter 2:1-22; Rom. 16:17-18; Phil. 3:2, 18-19; II John 9-11 ... Even so, Amen.
it seems THE RAPTURE is near and while I have to ask for help with patience - we know that THE RAPTURE to salvation is sure. - as is salvation for those who miss THE RAPTURE as long as they DO NOT TAKE THE MARK! you must find and follow JESUS
Science is not about finding evidence to fit your preconceived notions. Science is about making a hypothesis, objectively testing your hypothesis, and making an objective conclusion. It is important to take your wants, desires, wishes, etc. and set them aside so you can make an objective determination of truth. One should be trying to prove the hypothesis incorrect instead of proving the hypothesis correct. Attempting to prove a hypothesis correct leads to the insertion of personal biases which can affect observations and interpretations of results. Mainstream science itself fails at this and is just as guilty as the gentleman speaking about his conclusions. From what he stated, it is quite obvious that he is not actually using the scientific method and is basically making the information fit his personal beliefs instead of simply testing hypotheses to determine if they fit or do not fit observations. I wonder what he has to say about the aborigines of Australia whom claim their culture is over 60,000 years old. Is he going to claim that they are wrong because their oral tradition does not fit into the bible narrative?
If you apply the scientific method to determine credibility of the testimonies of the biblical writers, and then compare to something like the Aboriginies, then the Australian version simply doesn't stand the test. There are many stories in the bible that almost no on questions regarding the history, because they don't contain any supernatural, divine intervention. When it comes to the bible or any similar source, it's a cumulative case for determining each book based on credibility, archaeology, textual criticism, etc., but many beliefs around the world fairly easily fail in some ways. For example, Islam has many internal conflicts when it comes to comparing it to the Jewish and Christian books of references. Similarly, it's why as stated here the Native American history, cultural beliefs, and archaeology lead to a much more recent spread into the Americas than secular anthropologists push.
@@litigioussociety4249 First off, there are no testimonies made by biblical writers. They are all anonymously written. A testimony requires a person to identify themselves and provide a date, or to make a public statement in a public location, such as a court, which will document the event, and the person must make a statenent identifying themselves and take an oath that their statement is correct and true to the best of their knowledge. An anonymous writer writing a story is not a testimony. With that said, the vast majority of claims made in the bible are not scientifically testable claims. Notice how the speaker never gets into how he tested the bible claims or the data from the test? He just concludes that the biblical timeline is correct without going into any detail at all about which native american populations he interviewed, what was spoken about in the interviews, and how that could possibly even constitute a scientific test. The aborigines do not correlate with the biblical timeline, so they are just considered wrong and are left out of the study due to confirmation bias. This is not a "scientific study."
@@wesbaumguardner8829 I'm not even bothering making sense of all that, because you defined testimony by some weird legal definition, that is some arbitrary definition used by a coercive agency that engages in arbitration, rather than its descriptive, linguistic definition. A testimony is just a statement of experience; for example, "the car that hit the guy was a black Toyota being driven by a white woman."
What is the point of God making such a large universe if life is just going to be on Earth? The Bible doesn't mention anything about other planets with aliens on it. Also it says God created the "Sun, moon, and stars". The sun is a star so why say the Sun and stars? How does plant life exist without the Sun because plants were created before the Sun.
Nathaniel et. al. I have one VERY VERY strong criticism to your presentation. WOULD YOU PLEASE SLOW DOWN THE SPEECH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What are you guys doing, auditioning for one of these blurbs at the end of a commercial where they speed talk through disclaimers? Nathaniel if necessary take a course in public speaking and learn how to COMMUNICATE. You don't communicate by rushing through your topic at 100 mph. This channel's name is Zero Compromise. Well you compromised communication by slurring and speed talking. Consider that your audience is partially comprised of non-English speakers. You need to articulate. All four of you people need help in learning public speaking. You basically just ticked me off so much that I gave up after 4 minutes.
99% of real biologist have never and will never hear Jeanson’s name or work because he doesn’t even try to publish in real journals. Zero influence in the real scientific community.
5:20 - "see echoes of migration stamped on DNA" - what on earth does that mean? That people migrate around is well known in history; that is not an amazing insight from the bible -and the bible only deals with a tiny geographic region. And since humans are fairly recent, what about all the information about all the non-human species? He never mentions any predictions at any point, or how they are related to the bible.
If you look for videos on answers in genesis for dr. Jameson and his hour+ long videos go into much greater detail that were mentioned around 16:40. In those he has specific tribes in North America and their likely movement paths based on following shared genetics. He is getting data from current tribe members and comparing them with older genetic sources like in Mongolia for example.
@@jasonkeith5112 thats great but I am missing the connection to the bible, as the title says. That knowledge that peoples have migrated long distences is not particularly novel, and that asiatic people migrated, possible across the Bering strait has also been discussed for a long time. I don't see what the novel information is.
@@billjohnson9472 My guess would be that the migrations happened in thousands of years not tens of thousands of years. Creation scientists are open to researching something that would point to a young earth but the a typical scientist would self censor such evidence as it doesn't fit the evolutionary model. The claim on the subject heading seems to be overselling since there are plenty of other sources for confirmation of the Bible.
@@jasonkeith5112 It still doesn't seem to be connected to anything in bibles since the bible only deals with a limited geographic area. the authors of those stories had no idea of what was happening outside of that limited region. and genetics is great but we also have evidence of peoples being in north america for a very long time via artifacts they left behind.
Hard stopped the video halfway through, I'm not an idiot whose going to believe you cause you talk fast, the man has said nothing and explained nothing for the evidence of God. This was click bait
So where is the proof the Bible is right about creationism ? He just spilled tons of known studies but disputes the time line with no evidence. It’s pathetic.
How does using the DNA to trace the history of people through time by confirming their oral history with the DNA. They always told their history but they were mocked by those who noticed that it lined up with Biblical historical account of the world. People who do not want the global flood to be real, but facts can't be suppressed forever.
If Creationists could do good science they wouldn't be hanging out solely on social media, they'd be publishing actual research for peer review so that the world's experts in biology, geology, paleontology and genetics could review their work and attempt to falsify them. They'd go to universities, they'd go for Nobel prizes, they'd attend science conferences and so forth, but instead they just do podcasts, typically with no one present to offer counter viewpoints on the claims they make. Of course their natural response to this observation will be to accuse the rest of the entire scientific community with intellectual dishonesty while THEY are supposedly completely honest. Their starting agenda: the bible must be confirmed to be accurate no matter what - and that is precisely why they are relegated - and will continue to be relegated - to the .1%
Don't be so. gullible McFly. Those doing real scientific research in the creation sciences have been blackballed by the scientific community which has a monopoly on scientific funding and closely control the direction in which research is allowed to venture. This is no secret...many good scientists have lost their jobs because they went where the scientific evidence took them... a place challenging current paradigm and orthodoxy. This has happened time and time again....scientific discovery and advance is now held hostage to the secular worldview...not the evidence.
LOL Your as biased as is the so-called "experts" out there and this is why they don't do that. It is like going into a world of convinced mimicking apes.... Try telling an "expert" he has been wrong all along. Good luck with that. Even you have an emotional issue with it by your own words. By the way , they must conform to the people that is supplying their paycheck. Peer pressure is an added issue. "If Creationists could do good science they wouldn't be hanging out solely on social media, they'd be publishing actual research for peer review so that the world's experts in biology, geology, paleontology and genetics could review their work and attempt to falsify them". falsify them".??? Why not stopping at "an attempt to review their work? Atheism is religion not science.
There would be no science without The Bible....furthermore, Darwin was doing the same thing when he and his "peers of reason" set out to disprove The Bible. Would is surprise you that Newton and all his work came from biblical questions?
I can hear and comprehend fine at this speed. That said, there are some folks who speak quickly and I can just click the gear icon and choose a slower speed for the video and it helps a lot. 0.75 is usually slow enough for speedy speakers. 😊
Guess what.......the only thing we are panicking about is if a convicted felon/moron and his MAGA supporters come anywhere close to winning an election !! This group of nodding heads and "guest" is nothing to worry about.
If your god could have been proven to exist, all this pointless activity you are engaged in would have ceased a long time ago, because god himself would have stopped you making fools of yourselves and of him.
@@johnglad5 Do you know the game of telephone? because you are playing it right now. How do you know your claims are true? How do you prove that your claims are true? "My book says a thing" is neither proof nor evidence. Is your god omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient or not?
@@johnglad5 Your claim debunked by demonstrating how silly it is: Your comment is dumb. Superman came to earth, proved himself to be Superman thru miracles. He (Superman) then rose from the dead (was resurrected) with numerous witnesses.
@@Loading....99.99 For example Contradiction #1 Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel? (a) God did (2 Samuel 24:1) (b) Satan did (1 Chronicles 21:1). Contradiction #2 In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel? (a) Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9). (b) One million, one hundred thousand (1 Chronicles 21:5). Contradiction #3 How many fighting men were found in Judah? (a) Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9). (b) Four hundred and seventy thousand (1 Chronicles 21:5). Contradiction #4 God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine? (a) Seven (2 Samuel 24:13). (b) Three (1 Chronicles 21:12).
Yes, there are a few apparent discrepancies in the Bible but, I think, we need to balance that against the 63,779 cross references (verses that link and back up other verses) and the fact that archeological evidence proves the historical accuracy of the Bible time and time again. In light of this, I believe the Bible to be trustworthy and those questions you have do have answers if you're prepared to look for them with an open mind.
Wauw ... "a research biologist at AIG"
Image applying for a tenure at a university and you'd show up and present such credentials ... :)
I love Dr. Jeanson! I think he is absolutely genius. And your cable management is horrible! 😂
Excellent. Thank you. And thank you for talking so fast. You cover a lot more territory in one segment.
What a valuable work tracing back Native American people history!
The idea of tracing Y-chromosome genetics back to a bottleneck through Noah and the biblical flood involves a combination of theology and genetics. From a scientific perspective, the genetics of the Y-chromosome, passed down from father to son, allows researchers to trace paternal lineages over many thousands of years. However, the notion of a global bottleneck event as described in the story of Noah's flood does not align with current genetic evidence. Y-chromosome genetics shows clear markers of population bottlenecks, but these are associated with various points in human evolutionary history. For example, genetic studies indicate that human populations experienced a bottleneck around 70,000 years ago, likely linked to the Toba super volcanic eruption, which reduced human numbers dramatically. Other smaller bottlenecks can be tied to migrations out of Africa and regional population collapses. The concept of all modern males descending from a single man (as would be implied by Noah) is not supported by genetic data. While Y-chromosome Adam-the most recent common ancestor of all living male humans through the Y-chromosome-did exist, estimates place his existence around 200,000 to 300,000 years ago, far earlier than any timeline proposed for Noah's flood (usually around 4,000-5,000 years ago in biblical chronology). Furthermore, if a bottleneck as severe as the one described in the Noah narrative had occurred within the last few thousand years, we would expect to see clear genetic evidence across both paternal and maternal lines in human populations today, including reduced genetic diversity. However, the genetic diversity in modern humans suggests no such recent bottleneck. In short, while the Y-chromosome can provide a fascinating window into human ancestry and history, the evidence does not support a genetic bottleneck through Noah and the flood. Instead, human genetics points to much older and broader population dynamics.
4,000 yrs ago?
If you combine theology and genetics all you have is theology.
Don't confuse these folks with the facts. It just causes their heads to explode and then someone has to clean up the mess.
Always good to hear what Dr. Jeanson has to say
This was soooo much mor enjoyable when listened at .75 video speed because of all the jump cut editing.
Everyone set video speed to 0.75x 😅
The “researcher” is from Ken Hamm’s Answers in Genesis. That tells you all you need to know before even watching the video.
@@jimurban5367 meaning what?
@@francesmunro9560 Meaning that he already has his conclusions before his “research,” and he will try to make his research fit those conclusions rather than the other way around. Fairly typical of young-earth creationist types to ignore the mountains of evidence against their position in favor of a few, and often incorrectly interpreted, things that pass through their confirmation-bias filters.
@@francesmunro9560Hell, in the very first line of the video, the person said that “evolutionists” haven’t come up with anything new since Darwin. This is massively misinformed.
I have rarely heard so many unsupported and vague claims in one sitting. Let's just have one claim and look at the evidence for and against. There are also some attempts to sweep whole tranches of counter evidence under the carpet.
Dr Jeanson always has way tio much bang for the buck. I am always challenged to think about something new. And sometimes it ain't comfortable
Listen at .75 speed and the conversation is at a normal speed.
Actually muting it was better.
i had mine set at 1.25 when it started and about fell out of my chair.
This has to be automatically edited. Like based on a gate function.
Dr Nathaniel Jeanson is AWESOME.
I read his book Traced and very good book, I would recommend to anyone who interested in the origin of the major people
Group of the world he genetically traced the origins of 300 volunteers and there are links in the book to all the research for technically minded to explore.
Why was this segment so heavily edited and skipping?
They do that to cut video time. It adds up at the end.
They also have it playing faster. Sounds like 1.25 speed.
Because people aren’t patient enough to listen to longer talks.
@@merrym72veetee12 I think the actual answer is TH-cam doesn’t recommend longer content. It seems to me that the shows with the longer conversations are most popular.
@@katiek.8808 maybe. I know I tend to go for shorter, to the point talks, and get irritated by shows with a lot of “waffling” and distracting chit-chat😁
Genetically tracing dna and mapping geo-temporal distributions of different peoples are nothing new. If parts of the geo-temporal mapping align with some descriptions in the bible, that just means that the bible captured these parts of human history. That doesn't confirm the biblical descriptions of supernatural narratives. But sounds like he is having fun with his research. Good for him. As a researcher (though not a biologist), I feel excited for him.
I find it very telling when things are deliberately cast aside and not explored and I think we're in a time now that people will be more understanding to this sort of thing thanks to the various global events. They can't plug this despite how they will surely invent a new narrative and push from media etc. The game's up
Like they do with evolution, you mean?
Ok, I have something for you. This is something that everyone who thinks evolution is real, HATES! If you present an answer on a math test without showing the work, the answer is automatically wrong, but not so with evolution. 'They' can not actually show evolution work - at any level. There is a protocol, "ask a professor", that I have been using for years. When I ask this question, the only answer I get is that evolution has been proven for many years.
Q: Please show where one species mutates to another, AND can no longer mate with it's previous type, AND produces a viable offspring.
- No one seems to have an answer to this. The only thing I get is an emotionally over-reaction type, defensive answer, without knowledge (what I call "Emotional Override").
Try that, and see what goofy answers you get.
Ring species answers your challenge
😂
Maybe you should have paid more attention in class
😂
@@captaingaza2389 A straight line of descent showing the offspring having a birth defect, that offspring having it's own offspring with that birth defect in place, and then their offspring being another species. A random fossil with no direct bloodline is simply a birth defect that proves absolutely nothing. Who is the parents and offspring of your fossil? If you don't have them, then you cannot claim that a species changed into another species. All you have is an unscientific made-up guess.
@@captaingaza2389 Ring species are speciation. They may answer this guy's challenge, but they do nothing to show how all life evolved from a microbe. The notion that all life evolved from a microbe is 19th century mythology that can 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 be believed by faith with no support from modern molecular biology.
@@captaingaza2389I think ring species are an argument for why our classification system sucks and going by kind is better. This is just adhoc explanation to continue the evolution theory which is the entire history of evolution as an origin.
If you think Adam and Eve were the first and only parents of all Humanity, how did they get to be grandparents ? It’s called inbreeding and you can’t build an entire species like that without doing major damage to the genetic pool.
What’s the answer to that written in the Bible ?
"Helping you stand for truth in a world that falls for lies."
The fact that this is coming from a bunch of a creationists trying to debunk science is HILARIOUS! 😆
I know I’m getting old when everyone on the internet talks WAY too fast lol but this is exciting news
you can play the video at a lower speed, it helps...
Use your settings and slow it down!
Now children.........does anyone ever wonder why these YECs never get in an open debate/discussion with mainstream science or at the very least OECs ?
Stop using CLICK BAIT titles!! Thru all that verbiage no reference to the title subject. Just allusions!! Very disingenuous.
Yeah the world out there is sooo big ,here I am an Armenian listening to you(land of Ararat)
Great info!!! His many shots of espresso did everyone have before the show or did you all eat a pound of coffee beans? 😁
😂
Ooh, another genealogy book! Woo hoo, looking forward to it!
Great content but the editing made it kind of distracting.
Just subbed!
Mary Baker Eddie should be proud of you.
it looks like this program has been cut up
i have watched quite a few of dr jeanson's videos and the "actual" research he is doing is extraordinary and exciting, instead of the continuing bogus narrative pushed by the scientific community.
Editing out the gaps and pauses makes this impossible to watch. You seem to do this on your other videos as well and I struggle to digest what's being said.
I would love to learn more however this is too frustrating to watch.
@@SteigerPercMan they have to cut out the scenes where they are laughing about the creationist audience.
i love you family. also, i like the name. its just that family... we fight for all goodness and everyone when we fight for Yahushua HaMashiach, our Adon. thank you for what you do. expose what is not. we are already without excuse but it is good to take away what is not
It looks like something went wrong with editing? It's really an awesome research, but too difficult to follow when edited like this. Please don't be afraid to lose viewers by have a more slowed down conversation.
You can select a slower or faster playback speed by clicking the lower right gear icon.
If evolution is true, then God (if she exists) is a big awesome marvelous intelligent elegant God.
If creation ( as it is told in the bible) is true, then God is a simple, small God.
Creation science is a contradiction in terms
Biology is no science either 😂
Nice! I hope you feel better now!
Did you hear anything ?
Yep, they kept using the word prediction, when I'm fact they are cherry picking and distorting evidence and working backwards.
@@watchman2001 Of course it is - but you obviously have no idea what the term "science" even means. You sound like a climate hysteric.
LoL couple of years ago, I found out I'm Bantou.
Read Bill Coopers After the Flood, he studied the human race as far back as Noah and his family for 40 years and can trace it all as well.
Yes! Incredibly well well done research, and validation of biblical genealogy.
Great show guys, a better background would help though 😄👍😉 maybe a more "Conservative Biblical Scientific Background"... so you can appeal more the unsaved 😉
This is such a pathetically dishonest presentation.
No one is panicking.
Evolutionists are stupid.
"And now, now that we have the bible to say, 'What are the right answers? . . . "
As opposed to creation science before, when we didn't have the bible? What are you saying here?
***God creates as the bible says and science complements telling us HOW.***
Great books
I'd like to share an elemental concept needed for understanding creation in my video 'Sound reason ' , consistent with Scripture and electrical processies
God bless you and your work
Slow down team, you talk too fast.
Down speed the video 😂
I usually listen to podcasts at 1.25 speed so this is just right for me. You can always slow it down though.
Like Ben Shipiro!
@@Bruiser48 yes, he’s so fast I can’t keep up, he has a very squeaky voice to.
Listen at .75 speed and he speaks at normal speed.
Il est écrit : le monde gît sous la puissance du malin, satan le serpent ancien. DIEU CRÉA LE CIEL LA TERRE. IL CREA L'HOMME A SON IMAGE. IL CREA ADAM ET EVE. IL CREA LES ANIMAUX. IL EST ÉCRIT : ON NE SE MOQUE PAS DE DIEU. BEAUCOUP SE SONT MOQUES DE LUI, ILS ONT EU LEUR RÉCOMPENSE.
God did not create anything if he did then prove it.
***oui tres poetic e tres interessant, mais pas cientific. ***
Satan, le dieu de ce monde a aveuglé beaucoup.
@@wardraven8755 prouver quoi ? Je n'ai pas besoin de justifier quoique ce soit. Hors de Jésus-Christ, point de salut. Il Est la lumière du monde, des nations . Toutes choses Lui sont soumises. Ce que j'ai écrit, est écrit. Celui qui croira et qui sera baptisé sera sauvé, celui qui ne croira pas sera condamné. Vous ne pourrez pas dire, quand vous le verrez face à face que vous n'avez jamais entendu parler de Lui, Dieu, l'Éternel des armées, Maître et Créateur de toutes choses.
@@wardraven8755 Qui êtes vous, vous qui jugez ? Chercher Le, et vous Le trouverez.
Eish, guys, this is so speedy we can't comprehend what you're saying!
Listen faster.
We're not panicking, we're laughing at this drivel.
This man talks a lot without actually saying anything. The point is supposed to be what exactly? That he can "prove" history / historical events through DNA markers?
Do you know about the Y chromosome? Only men have one. Every man gets an exact copy of his father's Y chromosome, except that mutations occasionally creep in and accumulate. By comparing Y chromosomes from men around the world, he can figure out who descended from whom. He built a tree of "common descent" (which very inconveniently points back to one man at about the time of Noah). By examining the data he can see where peoples migrated, who descended from whom and he's verifying oral histories that had been dismissed.
@@KenJackson_US and i can say with confidence that he will never find a Y chromosome from god as a being of energy can’t make a person with dna nor can he have sex with a person that has dna to create a baby.
You do realize that he's written a book and done an ENTIRE series online that is free to watch anytime, right?
@KenJackson_US And therefore the logical conclusion from That is Out of Africa theory.... Noah's Flood.
@@johnglad5 The out of Africa theory is a desperate attempt to avoid the overwhelming evidence of the flood.
I really appreciate all you've done. It may be 90 years late based on hi jacking what was initially creationism to begin with as textualism methodology Christian objectivism proper tuned weights and measure guided issac newton and everything we've done that matters in science and of course reading rocks that cried out archeology Is rooted in it.
How the courts work under activism is just as antithetical to its own origin English law influenced by Moses commandments and not physical lawisms or stochastic platonic approach like republic or congress would.
Its like flipping intellectualism for intelligence under umbrella terms mythological notions of time that's not found on evolution.
Just like climate change it has no directives no prediction power .
The bible has & still does daily
I’m sorry I couldn’t continue listening to this very interesting conversation because you are all talking SO fast that I couldn’t follow what you’re saying. I’m someone well versed in creation science topics but still struggled to follow you as a Brit, where we talk much slower and deliberately. Our American cousins talk so fast it’s like drinking from a fire hose. Sorry to have missed it. 😢
Select the settings “Gear” icon and adjust the Playback speed to your liking
He's talking really fast even for Americans.
Look for the Transcripts
Slow the setting to .75 👌
They clipped the empty space out it seems like so it appears faster than it was in real life.
it would be a awesome presentation if the speaker would talk a little slower, he runs all his statements together, very little value if you can not absorb the information.!
This is so cut up and edited, it is annoying.
I got anxiety listening to this
and it's weird cause I listen to things at 2x speed sometimes
It’s at 1.25 for me and perfect!
@@appaloosa42 without rewatching, did you retain anything at all they said?
the whole comments section is saying the same thing
Just trying to grasp what's being talked about
@@WS-nj7nq Jeanson explains details of his statistical studies of male DNA mutations that lead back to 3 progenitors. Difficult to comprehend if you’ve not previously encountered his work, if one has it’s like cliffs notes… you can Ace a test but remember no details.
@@WS-nj7nq BTW I did need a prompt (1/2 second of the video) to remember what post you refer to.
So you are trying to prove that everything boils down to Noah because there were 8 people? If i got that correctly. Does it ever occur to you that we come from the same species naturally?
I’m so hoping
I’m yours
I have so many crazy facts meet JESUS
ONLY A BABY IN FAITH
1 year
Caves on mountains are earth harps
Vocal cords in medicine
안녕하세요 여러분 모두.
Hello mate.
Certainly there are Christians who do real science. Creation scientists have a different problem than Christian scientists, in that they often try to lead the evidence rather than follow the evidence. This is not to say that real science can't come form creation scientists but they have to show their work and put it up for peer review. There is nothing wrong with believing the bible is completely true and attempting to make an intellectual case for that belief in order to claim actual knowledge rather than belief. As a skeptic, I would certainly welcome such an intellectual case were it doesn't even have to be 100% but rather a case for the most important bits of the bible and it doesn't even have to be all of the important bits, just one single, crucial bit that should it be true would cause many to flock to Christianity.
Sounds like you have led your conclusions before you listened!
@@appaloosa42 Perhaps.
When you admit to throwing out demonstrable evidence which doesn't comport with your anecdotal stories in a 1000's year old book, that's not science, that's cognitive dissonance!
Cognitive dissonance is what causes Atheism.
@@CelticSpiritsCoven Cognitive dissonance is a psychological state of discomfort that occurs when a person's beliefs, values, or actions are contradictory or inconsistent.
Please provide an example of a belief, value, or action of atheism are contradictory or inconsistent.
@@JayBandersnatch Nothing for no reason doesn't create everything out of nothing. Atheists in their cult bubble don't want to admit that the tenets of their cult dogma flies in the face of reality. Just like all other extreme cult groups. Brainwashed. Cognitive dissonance on full display. Chaos doesn't create order. Natural Selection, Time, and Chance (non-physical things) seem to have the magical powers of God. So God can't be real, but those non-physical things can do his magic? Maybe someday you will realize that the reason you allowed yourself to be brainwashed into your cult is because you simply don't want to have a God that limits what sins you can do. So you deny reality and go deeper into the dogma.
@@JayBandersnatch Nothing doesn't, for no reason, create everything so precise from nothing. Cognitive dissonance denying reality is what your c*lt does.
@@JayBandersnatch "I don't want a God that limits what sins I can do, therefore I claim he doesn't exist". Cognitive dissonance. Wishing something out of existence.
Over halfway through at this point, and he has said a lot without saying anything at all. WHAT is the evidence that dismantles evolution?
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. OK I could live with that if 'heavens' means everything apart from the earth. v3. God created light, separated it from darkness and thus made the first day. This is poetic but surely the heavens include the sun? Ah well maybe it'll be clear later. v14. God made two great lights... He also made the stars. Hang on, what are the heavens then if not the universe filled with stars? How on earth was there day and night (or any light) without the sun? And the day before this vegetation grew presumably without sunlight - or was it the mysterious daylight created before the sun? This account must need heavy interpretation to make any sense at all. Why?
The light of God was the first light - you know, before he created the stars and the sun. Many plants are buried in soil when planted (no exposure to light) but start growing. There are other plants that grow without any exposure to light.
@@CelticSpiritsCoven Thank you for your reply. When I hear an interpretation like yours I think, "Then why not say, 'The light of God illuminated the earth on the first day. Thus the earth was able to bring forth vegetation of all kinds by this glorious light even before the sun and moon existed.'" God needs to give us thickies a fighting chance!
@@johnpritchard8946 Another way to interpret is to look more closely at the time-line. There was light (which God called "day"). The darkness he called "night". The text does not state that light illuminated the earth. "Evening" and "Morning" is simply the transition from one way or the other.
V14 is descriptive, not chronological. That's the way each section is structured: first the active creation event which characterises the epoch, then adding details and describing the purpose.
In this case, the heavenly bodies already exist, according to verse 1. What does verse 2 say? It describes that at the surface of the earth it was dark (and that it had no "form" from outside perspective) and shifts the perspective of the observer (God's Spirit) from the broader universe to the surface. Job 38 provides more details when God answers Job out of the storm and describes the sea during creation as having clouds its garment and it being "swaddled" in thick darkness... The thick and dark atmosphere didn't allow the light of the sun, moon and stars to reach the surface and made the shape of the planet hard to discern. You then see the gradual clearing described in further passages:
V3, enough light penetrates to determine day from night.
V6, the clouds are separated from the surface (and "clear" atmosphere exists between them) and the water cycle begins
V9, dry land and vegetation appears, which accelerate the clearing / filtering of the atmosphere
V14, finally the sun, moon and stars become visible and can function in their purpose, giving light on the earth and marking signs and seasons.
Note that the the phrase "And there was evening, and there was morning" mark the ending of one epoch and the beginning of another... And the seventh "day" doesn't have an end marked. Because it is still ongoing.
That's what I see the passage saying when examined in light of the whole of scripture and comparing the book of nature to the book of God.
@@stephenkeen6044 Thank you for your reply. I understand how you interpret these verses but I still find them odd. For example the vault of the sky created in v6 between the waters above and the waters below is referred to again in v14 when God created lights in the vault of the sky. But the sun and moon aren't between waters. I guess you could say its only their light that's in the sky or they only appear that way from the surface. But why not say so, "Now the sun was a great distance from the earth so it appeared in the sky the same size as the moon and neither were below the waters above though their light was everywhere even to the waters below and the surface of the earth." Culturally I like most of Christianity especially as it is in the NT but I keep finding problems in the bible that need interpreting. I'm glad I'm not in a Muslim country though.
We have a mountain of fossils discovered since Darwin. Science expands to include new information. Creationists cling to their book of mythology.
He should try to telax instead of rushing through his talk
It's apparent that you have NEVER READ ( nor understood / Daniel 10:21; 12:10; Prov. 28:4-7; I Cor. 15:33-34 / King James Bible ONLY! ) ... I Cor. 2:1-16; Rom. 8:5-13; Prov. 13:13; Amos 9:10; John 9:31; Heb. 7:26!! ... I'm not surprised. ... Revelation 17:1-18:24!! ... also: Ezekiel 2:1-3:27; 13:1-23; 18:1-32; 20:1-22:31; and 33:1-3311 ... I Tim. 6:3-10; Luke 6:24-26; II Cor. 11:3-4, 13-15; II Peter 2:1-22; Rom. 16:17-18; Phil. 3:2, 18-19; II John 9-11 ... Even so, Amen.
it seems THE RAPTURE is near and while I have to ask for help with patience -
we know that THE RAPTURE to salvation is sure. - as is salvation for those who miss THE RAPTURE as long as they DO NOT TAKE THE MARK!
you must find and follow JESUS
sad
Gab, eh? Figures.
Science is not about finding evidence to fit your preconceived notions. Science is about making a hypothesis, objectively testing your hypothesis, and making an objective conclusion. It is important to take your wants, desires, wishes, etc. and set them aside so you can make an objective determination of truth. One should be trying to prove the hypothesis incorrect instead of proving the hypothesis correct. Attempting to prove a hypothesis correct leads to the insertion of personal biases which can affect observations and interpretations of results. Mainstream science itself fails at this and is just as guilty as the gentleman speaking about his conclusions. From what he stated, it is quite obvious that he is not actually using the scientific method and is basically making the information fit his personal beliefs instead of simply testing hypotheses to determine if they fit or do not fit observations. I wonder what he has to say about the aborigines of Australia whom claim their culture is over 60,000 years old. Is he going to claim that they are wrong because their oral tradition does not fit into the bible narrative?
YOU JUST CONTRADICTED YOURSELF.
@@timkhan3238 Oh really? How so? Please explain in great detail. I cannot wait.
If you apply the scientific method to determine credibility of the testimonies of the biblical writers, and then compare to something like the Aboriginies, then the Australian version simply doesn't stand the test. There are many stories in the bible that almost no on questions regarding the history, because they don't contain any supernatural, divine intervention. When it comes to the bible or any similar source, it's a cumulative case for determining each book based on credibility, archaeology, textual criticism, etc., but many beliefs around the world fairly easily fail in some ways. For example, Islam has many internal conflicts when it comes to comparing it to the Jewish and Christian books of references.
Similarly, it's why as stated here the Native American history, cultural beliefs, and archaeology lead to a much more recent spread into the Americas than secular anthropologists push.
@@litigioussociety4249 First off, there are no testimonies made by biblical writers. They are all anonymously written. A testimony requires a person to identify themselves and provide a date, or to make a public statement in a public location, such as a court, which will document the event, and the person must make a statenent identifying themselves and take an oath that their statement is correct and true to the best of their knowledge. An anonymous writer writing a story is not a testimony. With that said, the vast majority of claims made in the bible are not scientifically testable claims. Notice how the speaker never gets into how he tested the bible claims or the data from the test? He just concludes that the biblical timeline is correct without going into any detail at all about which native american populations he interviewed, what was spoken about in the interviews, and how that could possibly even constitute a scientific test.
The aborigines do not correlate with the biblical timeline, so they are just considered wrong and are left out of the study due to confirmation bias. This is not a "scientific study."
@@wesbaumguardner8829 I'm not even bothering making sense of all that, because you defined testimony by some weird legal definition, that is some arbitrary definition used by a coercive agency that engages in arbitration, rather than its descriptive, linguistic definition.
A testimony is just a statement of experience; for example, "the car that hit the guy was a black Toyota being driven by a white woman."
Try to relax and pronounce his words more slowly
***the bible does not need any confirmation, it is only to help your believe.***
Just started panicking.😂
DNA gave hints and pointed toward God. Fine tuning of the Universe proved it without any shadow of a doubt
What is the point of God making such a large universe if life is just going to be on Earth? The Bible doesn't mention anything about other planets with aliens on it. Also it says God created the "Sun, moon, and stars". The sun is a star so why say the Sun and stars? How does plant life exist without the Sun because plants were created before the Sun.
Kewel stuff here :) Have y'all seen any of the Rick Renner videos on visiting Noah's Ark ? Very kewel bible history stuff too !
So many cuts, i wonder what the original footage looks like
Oh sure. This atheist is shaking in his fairy boots.
He doesnt enunciate his words.
Nathaniel et. al. I have one VERY VERY strong criticism to your presentation. WOULD YOU PLEASE SLOW DOWN THE SPEECH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What are you guys doing, auditioning for one of these blurbs at the end of a commercial where they speed talk through disclaimers? Nathaniel if necessary take a course in public speaking and learn how to COMMUNICATE. You don't communicate by rushing through your topic at 100 mph.
This channel's name is Zero Compromise. Well you compromised communication by slurring and speed talking. Consider that your audience is partially comprised of non-English speakers. You need to articulate. All four of you people need help in learning public speaking. You basically just ticked me off so much that I gave up after 4 minutes.
99% of real biologist have never and will never hear Jeanson’s name or work because he doesn’t even try to publish in real journals. Zero influence in the real scientific community.
What has creating to do with the bible? I don't see a logical connection.
The living Lord God created the good earth and all that's in it, including us. He created us. Is that the _"logical connection"_ you're missing?
@@KenJackson_US yes, it would be of it made sense.
This guy spoke an awful lot to reveal he has nothing
I'm not so sure: read his books...
5:20 - "see echoes of migration stamped on DNA" - what on earth does that mean?
That people migrate around is well known in history; that is not an amazing insight from the bible -and the bible only deals with a tiny geographic region.
And since humans are fairly recent, what about all the information about all the non-human species?
He never mentions any predictions at any point, or how they are related to the bible.
He plainly is on a YOUNG EARTH program. Sure they migrated, DNA can point out those much better.😢
If you look for videos on answers in genesis for dr. Jameson and his hour+ long videos go into much greater detail that were mentioned around 16:40. In those he has specific tribes in North America and their likely movement paths based on following shared genetics. He is getting data from current tribe members and comparing them with older genetic sources like in Mongolia for example.
@@jasonkeith5112 thats great but I am missing the connection to the bible, as the title says. That knowledge that peoples have migrated long distences is not particularly novel, and that asiatic people migrated, possible across the Bering strait has also been discussed for a long time. I don't see what the novel information is.
@@billjohnson9472 My guess would be that the migrations happened in thousands of years not tens of thousands of years. Creation scientists are open to researching something that would point to a young earth but the a typical scientist would self censor such evidence as it doesn't fit the evolutionary model. The claim on the subject heading seems to be overselling since there are plenty of other sources for confirmation of the Bible.
@@jasonkeith5112 It still doesn't seem to be connected to anything in bibles since the bible only deals with a limited geographic area. the authors of those stories had no idea of what was happening outside of that limited region.
and genetics is great but we also have evidence of peoples being in north america for a very long time via artifacts they left behind.
Hard stopped the video halfway through, I'm not an idiot whose going to believe you cause you talk fast, the man has said nothing and explained nothing for the evidence of God. This was click bait
something contradicting evolution does not mean it confirms the bible
I'm not a believer and I'm not going to sit through the fluff, can I get a TL:DR? Alternately I can just dismiss it as all bullshit.
So where is the proof the Bible is right about creationism ? He just spilled tons of known studies but disputes the time line with no evidence.
It’s pathetic.
Waste of twenty minutes. Just trying to sell you a book. Click bait video title. Not how you witness for Christ. Never talked about the reseach.
So basically you are creating fake evidence to prove god.
How does using the DNA to trace the history of people through time by confirming their oral history with the DNA. They always told their history but they were mocked by those who noticed that it lined up with Biblical historical account of the world. People who do not want the global flood to be real, but facts can't be suppressed forever.
Answer me, how is it fake?
Yes, tracing ancestry using genetics is faking evidence. 🤦♂️
God might have used evolution, evolution is just a mechanism
Your “research” confirms nothing
If Creationists could do good science they wouldn't be hanging out solely on social media, they'd be publishing actual research for peer review so that the world's experts in biology, geology, paleontology and genetics could review their work and attempt to falsify them. They'd go to universities, they'd go for Nobel prizes, they'd attend science conferences and so forth, but instead they just do podcasts, typically with no one present to offer counter viewpoints on the claims they make. Of course their natural response to this observation will be to accuse the rest of the entire scientific community with intellectual dishonesty while THEY are supposedly completely honest. Their starting agenda: the bible must be confirmed to be accurate no matter what - and that is precisely why they are relegated - and will continue to be relegated - to the .1%
Don't be so. gullible McFly. Those doing real scientific research in the creation sciences have been blackballed by the scientific community which has a monopoly on scientific funding and closely control the direction in which research is allowed to venture. This is no secret...many good scientists have lost their jobs because they went where the scientific evidence took them... a place challenging current paradigm and orthodoxy. This has happened time and time again....scientific discovery and advance is now held hostage to the secular worldview...not the evidence.
LOL Your as biased as is the so-called "experts" out there and this is why they don't do that. It is like going into a world of convinced mimicking apes.... Try telling an "expert" he has been wrong all along. Good luck with that. Even you have an emotional issue with it by your own words. By the way , they must conform to the people that is supplying their paycheck. Peer pressure is an added issue.
"If Creationists could do good science they wouldn't be hanging out solely on social media, they'd be publishing actual research for peer review so that the world's experts in biology, geology, paleontology and genetics could review their work and attempt to falsify them".
falsify them".??? Why not stopping at "an attempt to review their work? Atheism is religion not science.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lay_Catholic_scientists
I think they have been pushing the limits for awhile.
There would be no science without The Bible....furthermore, Darwin was doing the same thing when he and his "peers of reason" set out to disprove The Bible. Would is surprise you that Newton and all his work came from biblical questions?
@@alantasman8273 LOL you couldn't provide evidence for creation if your life depended on it.
No points no evidence no arguments another liers tryng to make It Up just words
Please speak slower
I can hear and comprehend fine at this speed. That said, there are some folks who speak quickly and I can just click the gear icon and choose a slower speed for the video and it helps a lot. 0.75 is usually slow enough for speedy speakers. 😊
Slow down on your pot smoking and you will catch on to real speed
And real😮
Atheists are panicking because GOD❤ is REAL, truly REAL!!
Guess what.......the only thing we are panicking about is if a convicted felon/moron and his MAGA supporters come anywhere close to winning an election !!
This group of nodding heads and "guest" is nothing to worry about.
absolute garbage..
LOL if they found a 2000-year-old turd in the desert between Egypt and Israel they would be claiming it's proof of the bible .
Are there anything in archaeological history that aligns with anything that's written in the bible?
@@Loading....99.99pretty much everything
And you would claim it wasn't.
Sadly, your the ONLY one specializing in TURDOLOGY
Lol, finding a fossil with a birth defect doesn't prove that one species changed into another species.
If your god could have been proven to exist, all this pointless activity you are engaged in would have ceased a long time ago, because god himself would have stopped you making fools of yourselves and of him.
Your comment is funny. God came to earth, became human, proved himself to be God thru miracles. He then rose from the dead with numerous witnesses.
@@johnglad5 Do you know the game of telephone? because you are playing it right now. How do you know your claims are true? How do you prove that your claims are true? "My book says a thing" is neither proof nor evidence. Is your god omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient or not?
@@johnglad5 Your claim debunked by demonstrating how silly it is:
Your comment is dumb. Superman came to earth, proved himself to be Superman thru miracles. He (Superman) then rose from the dead (was resurrected) with numerous witnesses.
Have Ken H. train this guy on how to share information the more I watch the more I lose the message.
Jesus is lord
This is complete word salad, genisys disputes itself. Have these guys actual read the bible.
Have you? The Bible is fluid. Yet evolution is an insane meaa that answers no questions and is totally implausible, if not impossible.
Wrong
@@katlyn214 What is wrong?
@@criticalthinker8007 feral logic
Ok, you made a claim. An example from Genesis, please?
With all its contradictions the bible refutes itself.
Can you point to a contradiction in the bible you're referring to.
@@Loading....99.99 For example
Contradiction #1
Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel? (a) God did (2 Samuel 24:1) (b) Satan did (1 Chronicles 21:1).
Contradiction #2
In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel? (a) Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9). (b) One million, one hundred thousand (1 Chronicles 21:5).
Contradiction #3
How many fighting men were found in Judah? (a) Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9). (b) Four hundred and seventy thousand (1 Chronicles 21:5).
Contradiction #4
God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine? (a) Seven (2 Samuel 24:13). (b) Three (1 Chronicles 21:12).
Yes, there are a few apparent discrepancies in the Bible but, I think, we need to balance that against the 63,779 cross references (verses that link and back up other verses) and the fact that archeological evidence proves the historical accuracy of the Bible time and time again. In light of this, I believe the Bible to be trustworthy and those questions you have do have answers if you're prepared to look for them with an open mind.
@@garywatson6886 The bible is not a book about history and science.
@@georg7120it is also a historical book. Are you kidding? There are two books literally called Chronicles.
Great books