Christian Biologist Releases GROUNDBREAKING Discovery on Human Origins! | Traced: Episode 14
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- Creation science research, based upon genealogies in Genesis 10, demonstrates young earth timelines in groundbreaking DNA discoveries.
It’s groundbreaking scientific research that provides revolutionary discoveries about “race,” ethnicity, and even human history. And it’s only possible because the researcher, Harvard-trained Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, starts with the history and the timeline God has given us in his Word.
See the full playlist of Traced episodes here: • Traced: DNA's Big Surp...
Order the book now:
answersingenes...
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world:
AnswersinGenes...
I am a 59 year old man from Louisiana. I has seen first hand evidence that the Great flood happened. When i was only 16 years old i began working on oil drillings rigs in Adams County Mississippi. One night we were drilling 300 or 400 feet deep when our return from our circulation of drilling mud.(this kept our drill bit cool and also moved out trash up and out of the hole) when our trash screens plugged up. We fought this problem all night. Amazingly what was plugging up our pump? it was Cypress wood. Now how did this tree get so deep under ground (this is out in the woods)? no other explanation is possible.
This is a beautiful testimony. My father has one similar.
@@rahowherox1177 Petroleum originated from minerals at extreme temperatures and pressures.
Actually, there are dozens of possible explanations. First, the coastline in the Gulf is changing constantly. The woods where this was found, may have, thousands of years ago, been swamp land. Perhaps a hurricane uprooted a tree and dropped it into the swamp, which today is woodland. Learn to think critically.
Nobody doubts about the existence of the great flood. It is related to the end of the last glaciation. Giant floods are recorded by many cultures around the world. Genesis in the bible is a copy form a Sumerian tablet. And the flood which is described is probably the filling of the Black sea from the Mediterranean sea.
@@efandmk3382
@EFANDMK
A swamp that was 300 to 400 feet deep? A log sunk 300 to 400 feet deep into swamp land? I believe Martin has thought it through far more critically than you have. To clarify, as you mentioned elsewhere that you're catholic, do you not believe in the Biblical flood?
As a Christian who is a historian and genealogist, this fascinates me immensely. If God had wired me with a science brain, this is what I would study. But I'm thankful He gave us all different gifts that we can use for His glory. Thank you for all your hard work and research!
Yeah I wish I was more scientifically minded as well. Then it wouldn't take so long for me to learn stuff. I want to learn more to better at apologetics but it takes my brain a while to download information.
I'm an ex-atheist and believed Darwinian evolution until 1993 when I converted to Biblical Theism and the historical nature of Genesis. I find it bizarre that quite a few of my brethren have a difficult time believing that Genesis is just straight history and try and blend in different theories to stretch out a time span beyond that which is written.
yeah I'm of the same opinion
It's because the first three chapters of Genesis aren't written from a Newtonian-scientific paradigm. They were written using ancient cosmological symbolism. Not to cast any doubt on the truth of Genesis, or the origins of the world and man; but a science textbook the Bible does not make, brother/sister.
@@deathtomediocrity111 ...that's right, as Genesis is a historical book. 'This happened'.
Why were you an atheist?
@@deathtomediocrity111 No, Genesis 1 isn't ancient cosmological symbolism. It's historical narrative. That's the genre of literature it belongs to.
We are told in scripture that alone of all the prophets God spoke to Moses face to face. And Moses wrote what God commanded him. Even Christians, such as yourself, lose sight of this, that the scriptures are given by God, not man. This being the case, God has told us what He did at the beginning, and that account is not cultural as it doesn't come from man. And that account is true as written.
As Basil of Caesarea once said, ‘It is this which those seem to me not to have understood, who, giving themselves up to the distorted meaning of allegory, have undertaken to give a majesty of their own invention to Scripture. It is to believe themselves wiser than the Holy Spirit, and to bring forth their own ideas under a pretext of exegesis. Let us hear Scripture as it has been written.’ (Homily IX:1)
Yes, let us hear the scriptures as God has communicated them. Stop investing into them a majesty of our own invention, and we will believe the truth.
As a Christian, while I don't require it for my own faith, it is great to know that actual science continues to confirm the timeline of the Bible.
Unless you are Chinese with a recorded history about as long as Ken Ham thinks the world has existed.
***scientists do not confirm anything specially stupidity like this. You call yourselves christians? so read the New Testament and learn what Jesus teaches, that is what being a Christian is all about.***
What actual science confirms the bible? explain
@@Gary-fq8cx Psychopathology explains its popularity
@@oakfat5178 😂 I like that. You made my day with that...
As a believing Christian, I love when I listen to greater men than myself when they explain the bible scriptures scientifically.
@Ted Livingston what
Same here.
@Ted Livingston What are you talking about?
@Ted Livingston that's terrible advice.
pseudoscientifically
I have owned a small strip of land along a creek for about 30 years. I believed Genesis before I got my place, and watching what heavy rain can cause solidified my faith in the Old Testament account of the Great Flood. I have seen marine fossils at high elevations also. God said that He would never again destroy the earth with a flood. That means that no flood since the Noah Flood has been as significant in its expanse or affect. However, if people are honest, they should be able to see that large amounts of water can cause incredible change in a landscape. I totally believe Genesis and the rest of the Old Testament, and all of the New Testament. I am glad that Jesus Christ is the Ark, and the Lamb of God, that we need to save us from what we deserve.
The Bible is 100% true and accurate. It's taken me a life time to come to this conclusion. God Bless.
all your life you were right now you jumped to a wrong conclusion...sorry buddy but your bible isnt no where near true and accurate...you got scared not to believe since you got older and the threats made you jump to conclusions
Evolution never happened, but The Bible is far from true and accurate. Corrupted by a satanist who burned thousands of innocent people at the stake.
Kaneh Bos, Prime ingredient in God's holy oil, is cannab1s. Calamus is a king james lie.
In 1980 the Hebrew University in Israel confirmed Benet's identification of Kaneh-Bosm as hemp, and the respected anthropologist Weston La Barre(1980) referred to the Biblical references in an essay on cannabis. In that same year respected British Journal New Scientist also ran a story that referred to the Hebrew Old Testament references, (Malyon & Henman 1980). A modern counterpart of the word is even listed in Ben Yehudas Pocket Dictionary and other Hebrew source books
***you are absolutely right 100% accurate, mythologically and theologically accurate.***
My husband did a timeline from the bible account alone, in excel which calculates time in Anno Mundi and AD and BC parallel years which brings us into the 6,000 years today exactly. He has all the biblical references marked. This took him 40 plus years to do. We printed it. It was 76 ft long as connected pages on the wall.
Can you share the Excel Document?
WOW what a total waste of time..... and paper.
We are in Hebrew year 5783
We are in Hebrew year 5783
Please share the excel when you can or send a link of how to view 😊
Praise God for all you are doing AIG! May the Lord continue to bless you in all things.
Fantastic work. We need more people to shed light in a world that is going completely crazy. Keep it up and God bless.
My guess is : this thing called humanity , came and went about 3 or 4 times ... It's just a guess on my part . I like to stare into the sky and think of stuff .
@SimonMeade Great last name, Couz! 😁✝️🙏
I, even as a born again Christian, I have doubted that the Genesis story to be actually realistic, but a story passed down for hundreds of years as mere Jewish literature. And at the same time I believed totally that the New Testament was God inspired. That was my honest contradiction. Thank you for this information that is so educational about the concept of DNA. Wow.
I used to also equate the Old Testament as on a level with a fairytale, until I once lived nextdoor to an Orthodox Jewish family. They were doing everything as the Torah instructed them to do, keep the Sabbath, circumcise their sons, eat kosher, observe festivals and Holy Days, etc. It blew my mind that what they were following was written down by Moses 3500 years ago. Imagine if you gave you children a set of commands to follow and you came back 3500 years later to find their descendants still following your commands to the letter. Only something that was God inspired would have lasted and been followed for so long.
The old he Hebrew scribes were scrupulous. And would have never allowed Jewish fables to get past them
@@broz1488 Yet, unless they embrace Jesus as Messiah...they will be eternally separated from God...no matter what works they do ...written down my Moses or anyone else.
I only have a very vague and pedestrian understanding of these things, but the fact that it is intended to prove the biblical narrative makes it worth the watch time.
" ...... every knee shall bow, and every tongue shall confess that Jesus is Lord to the Glory of God the Father."
So you don’t care if it’s accurate, as long as it aligns with what you believe? Smh
@@monteclark1115
Nice way to twist what I said, pagan. I never said that I have *no* understanding, but I'm not trained in this discipline, so I have to trust that what he is saying is true. Just like you trust the engineers who have built anything that you use daily, even though you most likely have little to no idea how those things work or why they are trustworthy in their capacities.
Where did I state that I didn't care if it is accurate?? Nothing in my statement even remotely reflects that. Read in much??
Your accusation is more accurately applied to Evolutionism and Evolutionists.
@@steadfastneasy26 I don’t just put my trust in one person, I look at other sources and compare them to make sure their conclusions align with each other. This guy doesn’t even site any peer reviews or any other evidence. It’s just him basically saying believe what I said because I said so. I tried to look him up on Wikipedia but it just redirects to the AIG Wikipedia article, which I find to be very informative. By the way, evolution is science, it’s not a religion, so there’s no such thing as evolutionism. And I’m not a pagan, that’s a religion as well.
@@monteclark1115 Your belief in "science", which is actually just a process, and academia's scientists, as your spotless, high priests, is your religion, pagan..
@@jimtomczak7374 I don’t have a religion, I believe that scientific evidence is correct, but I don’t worship it, I don’t prey to it, I don’t observe a special holiday for it, I don’t worry about making it mad at me, I don’t have to please it or watch what I think because it might strike me dead because of the random thoughts that are going through my mind. It’s not a living or supernatural thing. Creationists can’t comprehend that because they are indoctrinated and wired to think on a binary basis. On or off, black or white, all or nothing. They can’t comprehend medium, colors in between, glass half full. They believe if a person is not dedicated 100% to god, then by default they are a full blown Satan worshiper. I don’t follow ether one.
As a life-long Christian, I'm happy to see a Ph.D. expose Darwinian evolution as a secular attempt to discredit the Gospel. I hope that Dr. Jeanson submits article to peer-reviewed journals to force atheist journal editors to consider the Truth, the Light, and the Way.
Darwinian evolutionary theory DOES NOT attempt to discredit the Bible. It is a very credible theory of the natural world. Don't take sides.
@@482jpsquared There is only one side, and the is the side of God and His kingdom. I will pray for you.
John Pelletier said "Go ahead if it makes you feel better."
Yes, it makes me feel better to know that I'm helping you find Jesus.
@@paulthompson9668 So you have no comment on following evidence vs faith? Did you watch the Sam Harris video I sent you?
I have been saying this about the origin of mankind for years and Genesis chapters 1-3 is the key to understanding all that God has created.
@Preston Swan What's the truth about the origin of the universe and life, according to your fairy tale?
@Preston Swan Keep sidestepping the question, you must be shy about your own little fairy tale of origins. Let's see who has childish imaginations lol
@Preston Swan
You don't have an answer, do you?
You know full well every possible answer to the origin of existence requires faith in something that cannot be proved or disproved.
Your heart rejects God because in your conscience you know you have offended Him and deserve punishment.
The only punishment is eternity in Hell, a place designed for the punishment of demons, which are far more powerful than us.
Fortunately, Jesus is God.
He took the punishment of death, substituting His perfect blood for ours.
He resurrected Himself, in order to demonstrate forgiveness for what we have done to Him.
We can keep out of Hell, but only if we recognize Jesus is God, recognize our sin and the resulting peril, and ask Jesus to forgive us.
@Preston Swan The tell me this fairy tale of yours... what's the origin of the universe and life? Don't be shy🙄
@Preston SwanIt seems that your reasoning power has gone down a blind alley.
What part do you not get about if God exists, His power, intellect and being is of absolute brilliance. The one who created billions of trillions of stars, life with its amazing intricacies and put everything together is in charge of His own creation, and is able to do ANYTHING with it, at any time He pleases. This includes all the things you perceive as fantastic and impossible.
You may not believe He exists, and He does, but to reason that He doesn't exist from the reasoning place of Him not existing, goes beyond circular reasoning, to blind "reasoning".
If God exists, and He does, He can and does do anything He wants. The laws of His creation, He created. He has the power to suspend them and do anything He chooses, according to His own purposes.
Stop reasoning that the idea that He sometimes intervenes in His own creation, doing things that fall outside of its laws, which He created, for purposes of His own, means He cannot exist. It rather means that He does.
That there was a garden of Eden, where man lived before he fell through disobedience, you cannot know, except through God's record He has kept for us, giving it to Moses. The knowledge of eternity and the desire to live forever certainly lives within every heart, because it's the way it's meant to be.
You are coming from a place of complete darkness, so you are not comprehending the light.
This series is always over my head in terms of research, but I appreciate the biblical viewpoint.
@tripp maloney capybara 😎 👍
Research? You mean using* only the 'data' that fits their agenda?
*manipulating, making up, misusing, etc
Don’f feel bad. I’m not above water most of the time and I posses above average comprehension skills. I can only follow the general narrative and I am terrible at dates and unfamiliar with the timeline.😅.
I do have the book though, and I need to sit down and go through it slowly, and while referencing all the diagrams. I will say that it makes a lot of sense. I can definitely believe the mainstream scientists are filtering out data to fit the narrative.
@@madddog7 I have no idea. I don't understand the sceince.
@@Mahhkz _" can definitely believe the mainstream scientists are filtering out data to fit the narrative."_
you have that backward. AiG fits the data to their conclusion: 'god did it'. That's not science
I read the book carefully and it is well balanced, honest (with other scientific studies I have read) and thought provoking. DNA, tRNA, mRNA, the Epigenome codes and nano machines inside the cell such as motor proteins could not possibly have evolved by Darwinian theory. Information shows intelligence.
@@globalcoupledances I can't find it in google, do you have an article name / link?
@@globalcoupledancesYou are assuming that God is within the bounds of the physical universe. His word clearly says he is not. Your belief in random chance and chaos becoming ordered requires greater faith!
I totally agreed with you there yeah there's no millions and billions of dead people and animals have not been found and therefore it doesn't exist million years billions of years of evolution that didn't exist , there's no proof and can't really see it ‼️
@@mayowankenobi His word? What person who doesn't have a serious mental disorder hear any mythical gods speak?
@@mayowankenobi The verifiable Scientific evidence shows otherwise
I've never believed in the millions and billions of years claims about the age of the earth. Even as a young man, I felt the numbers seemed ridiculous and conjured out of thin air. I love the fact that the life of Jesus is so close in time to mine. I could travel to Jerusalem and touch the stones on the streets and steps on which he walked. That is amazing to me, and makes him feel even closer than he is.
Your personal feelings are irrelevant to science. The numbers aren't conjured out of thin air but based on scientific evidence.
All we have on Jesus on the other hand are stories from men who never even met him...
Stories that often were written decades after he supposed to have lived.
@@Jewonastick What's your point? Denying Christ and his eyewitnesses? People that died by execution because they saw him rise from the dead and ascend to heaven? Idk about you but I wouldn't die for a lie. Jesus is as real as you and me and I can prove it because we speak and He answers my prayers. Explain how that works. Only fools deny God exists. But it is your choice not to believe. You will see him one day. We all will.
@@senpaimami2496 Name one eye witness of Jesus his resurrection that wrote about it himself.....
Who died because they saw him rise to heaven and how do you know them?
Other than what the bible says you have nothing it. Zero
@@senpaimami2496
You don't have eyewitness testimony, you have hearsay.
There is a gigantic difference.
Also, someone dying for what they believe to be true, tells you absolutely nothing at all about the truth of what they believe.
@@Jewonastick And the stars are indifferent to astronomy, but we choose to give them a name. Is that just based on feelings?
It's quite typical of an atheist to label my faith as a feeling. That's from page 1 of The Narcissist's Handbook. Dismiss all claims as fantasy. What are the scientific processes that determine matter to be millions or billions of years in age?
This is such a brilliant series. Praise to the Triune God for his love and truth.
We were created in his image, Triune beings, all of us. Mind, body, Spirit. Jesus said that he and the father are one. What made them one? Kindred spirit. In their case, spirit of truth. God is truth.
The trinity is false, Jesus Christ is the Father Isaiah 9:6, and He's one with the Father John 10:30, For all the fulness of the Godhead dwells in Him Colossians 2:9, Fo He is the Almighty God revelation 1:8
Praise Father, Son and Holy Spirit! Amen
@@RobertA-oi6hw Yes! Jesus is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit! Praise Him forever and ever! Amen.
Never saw a triune God being three different beings in all the bible :) God always been one and never three. Jesus is GOD MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 1Tim.3:16
This reminds me of the late nineteenth and early 20th century archeological discoveries that forced researchers to once again take geographic references in the OT seriously. This was an epoch when, after a period of complete rejection and mythological supposition, Nineveh, Babylon, Ur, Jericho etc. were discovered and excavated.
One of the keys to knowing the truth, is believing what God said about creation.
Amen.
Starting with your conclusions is bad reasoning.
But how do you know what God said? All you know is what men said God said, and these men are inconsistent with each other.
@@kevinkingmaker7395 where are the inconsistencies? Read the Bible from cover to cover and tell me of an inconsistency.
@@broz1488 Lots of people have told us what God says (in court this is called 'hearsay' and is notoriously unreliable): Joseph Smith, The Prophet, David Koresh, etc,. Not all are Christian, not all accept The Bible. And no, I am not going to read The Bible cover to cover, but there are inconsistencies. Like the differing Gospel accounts of who discovered Jesus' body missing from the tomb. But the real inconsistencies I am referring to are the inconsistencies among religions. So my point remains: How do you know what God says?
All very fine and good though I am far more interested in where I'm going than where/when I came from. "Even so come Lord Jesus."
I am not a Christian, but I do believe the universe has a Creator. I'm also a high IQ individual. Ok, I've bought the book, am fascinated and believe it. BUT AIG needs to find someone who can explain this material in an understandable way. Watching this video, I feel like somebody has shoved a 3" wide tube down my esophagus and then, in one push, tried to pump a week's worth of food into my stomach. I will watch multiple times until I get it, but I'm not sure the material can't be presented better. Yet I am still very grateful to Dr. Jeanson for sharing his brilliance.
In John 14:6 it states that Jesus said: I am the way, the truth and the life and that no man can come to the Father but by me. Personal repentance and accepting Jesus as the risen savior is the only way by which men may be saved. Accept Jesus today.
Once again wonderful work and clear information…, Thanks 🙏
Love this, thank you for dedicating your time to this study. We are so close to Jesus returning. Keep looking up!
Daniel 12:4
But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
Yes and Amen 🙏
What is he going to do when he returns? I’m curious I don’t follow religion much. Just asking, no disrespect.
How will you know it's Jesus?
Because God is not a liar. I only pray that people will realize it was him.
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 KJV
[16] For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: [17] Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
@@tomvela77
Are you trying to say that you'll know it's Jesus because dead people will rise from the grave?
Do you remember the film Man of steel? The Khryptonians had the partial scull of their “Adam” in a safe place. This unified them with the confidence that they could rebuild their society, any place, anytime through this genetic building block. -spoiler alert- When it was destroyed, we find out that Superman was the living embodiment of that unifying genetic code. Hopefully Jesus ,our perfect Adam will return soon and unify us.
Jesus however is the Superman and Super God who humbled himself to save a sinful mankind.
I probably shouldn't have started with Part 14.
He did a series in 2020 too.
That would give you a solid foundation for these current videos.
Brilliant, sublime, insightful-and true! Wow, and I am NOT easily impressed. Congratulations to Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson et al.
"Wow, and I am NOT easily impressed. "
Yes you are, all you need is a charlatan posing as a scientist and you're impressed just because he confirms all the crap you were already taught by your parents, priests and surroundings.
Maybe you could do some reading for your own.
Maybe you could think "hmm, I'm gonna check what other scientists have to say about what Jeanson claims" ...
Maybe then you'll find out he's a liar and an imposter, funded by creationist foundations.
Glory to God for raising up men like this and calling them to Himself, Jesus Christ. And calling them to these types of scientific ministries, to share and leave the scoffers with "no excuse" to deny His truth.
I love these!! Thank you Dr. Jeanson for all you have done to share evidence of biblical truth!!!
Jeanson has sold his soul to the devil and is working alongside Islamist fundemantalists, then send him donations and he hasnt declared any of this to the public!
what evidence? none what so ever>>>>no such thing as biblical truth since the bible hardly ever gets anything right
The triune or trinity is a man made concept. It is not in the Bible. When it says that God and Jesus (Archangel Michael at the time), are "one", it was not meaning that they are the same person, it means that they are in agreement in all things. Just as a very powerful man and his son could be "one" in that they are in total agreement in their outlook and objectives. The power that God has, or in the case of this illustration, the man has, is lent to his son to use in their stated common goals, which the son does willingly with his father's approval and direction. There is no "trinity as in "God the father, God the son and God the holy ghost", (God's power). First of all when the Bible says that Michael was a god and also later refers to the apostles as gods, you have to know what the word GOD means. It means "mighty one". There is no denying that within their own places and spheres of operation, Michael/Jesus, and the apostles were mighty ones acting in concordance with Almighty God's design and wishes. This does not mean that they were the same as Almighty God and were deserving of worship. God is called Almighty because he is the most powerful entity to ever exist and all things were created through his power, which he allowed his first creation, the one referred to as his "only begotten son" (Michael the Archangel), to use, to create further things under his direction. We know part of God's nature as we are created in his image, (creativity, all the emotions, facets of our personalities, reasoning et al). What God's actual substance is we do not know beyond the vague description of "spirit creature", and that no one can see him and live. Which attests to his incredible power. Incidentally, although the Catholic church has given names to a number angels, that is also a man made up terminology. There are only three angel's named given in the Bible. Michael the Archangel who was sent to Earth as Jesus give us all the opportunity for salvation. The next is Gabriel who operated as God's chief heavenly messenger and of course, Lucifer, who made himself into Satan thorough jealousy and acted against God directly. Another thing that is a man made bit of dogma is the "immortality of the soul". There were a number of ancient civilizations that believed in a similar concept, but as far as Christianity goes it was introduced by Aristotle and Plato, the Greek philosophers. The Church philosophers at the time though this was a great idea to use to bring in more converts, and of course making some $$$ on the side by selling indulgences. Christendom lost it's way almost entirely in 325 AD at the first council of Nicaea when they allowed Constantine to dictate their beliefs to them...
Biblical truth is god condones slavery throughout the bible. Does Dr Jeanson deny that fact?
@@Gary-fq8cx That was before the Christian era. The reasons for things like that happening in the old testament, which is basically a history of the Jews under God's directorship. Much of what happened then, is a foreshadowing for our day. In ancient times God allowed his people to own slaves. (Genesis 14:14, 15) Even in the days of the apostles, some Christians were slave owners and some were slaves. (Philemon 15, 16) Does this mean that the Bible condones oppressive slavery? By the time the Bible began to be written, humans had already established social structures and economic systems that conflicted with godly principles. While some of the practices involved were condemned in his written Law, God chose to tolerate others, such as slavery. God’s Law regulated slavery so that, if practiced, slaves would be treated in a humane and loving manner. Kidnapping a man and then selling him was punishable by death. (Exodus 21:16)
However, if despite all the provisions made to prevent poverty, an Israelite found himself deeply in debt, perhaps as a result of poor management, he could sell himself as a slave.
In some cases he might even be able to earn a surplus by which he could redeem himself.-Leviticus 25:47-52. A person found guilty of stealing who was unable to make full restitution according to the Law could be sold as a slave and in this way pay off his debt. (Exodus 22:3) When he had worked off the debt, he could go free.
Cruel and abusive slavery was not allowed under God’s Law to Israel. While masters were allowed to discipline their slaves, excesses were forbidden. A slave killed by his master was to be avenged. (Exodus 21:20) If the slave was maimed, losing a tooth or an eye, he was set free.-Exodus 21:26, 27.
The maximum time that any Israelite would have to serve as a slave was six years. (Exodus 21:2) Hebrew slaves were set free in the seventh year of their service. The Law demanded that every 50 years all Israelite slaves were to be set free nationwide, regardless of how long the individual had been a slave.-Leviticus 25:40, 41.
When a slave was released, the master was required to be generous toward him. Deuteronomy 15:13, 14 says: “In case you should send him out from you as one set free, you must not send him out empty-handed. You should surely equip him with something from your flock and your threshing floor and your oil and winepress.”
Later, in the days of Jesus and his apostles, slavery was an entrenched practice in the Roman Empire. As Christianity spread, it was inevitable that individuals who were slaves and others who were slave owners would come in contact with the good news and become Christians.
Neither Jesus Christ himself nor his apostles preached a gospel of social liberation, as if trying to reform the existing system. Rather, both slaves and slave owners were admonished to love one another as spiritual brothers.-Colossians 4:1; 1 Timothy 6:2.
This is also over my head and understanding but it also blesses me that it confirms Acts 17:26 from one man He made every nation living on the surface of the earth and He fixed the limits of their territories and the periods when they would flourish. GOD did this, so that people would look for Him, and perhaps reach out and find Him although, in fact, He is not far from each one of us, for in Him we live and move and exist…
Yeshua HaMashiach is LORD!
❤️🔥❤️🔥🕊️🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
@Preston Swan That's a common charge Preston you are not alone. Even Christians wish God would reveal himself (physically) right now. I wish that too. But, you must remember that God *did* make himself known way back when he created us. He walked with Adam and Eve. And they knew him face to face. Tragically, Adam and Eve sinned against God. And so he removed himself from our presence (physically), in a face to face sort of way. That's a direct result of sin. And that's how terrible sinning against God is. And that's why we have a sin nature, even now.
Christ came to die on the cross for our sins. To repair that broken relationship for us. And to try to keep it brief, I'll just leave you with one verse that speaks to your concern. I know it's kind of harsh, but it's true!
"For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." Romans 1:20
When we stand before God, we will have no excuse.
@Preston Swan I think you are extremely underestimating the "nature" of God then. Especially his holiness. God is not one of us. He's not like us at all. He is God. The "I am". The beginning and the end. When he speaks, his will is done. If you really grasped God's nature, then you would be able to understand that it's not about a heavenly grudge. It's about justice -- for a perfect and holy God, against whom us puny, weak, unworthy creatures sinned (against a perfect God). He didn't have to spare us at all. But he chose to. His will.
There's much more to it than that, but I don't want to write you a book. Why God chooses to do some of the things he does, I as a human being with limited knowledge cannot tell you. And many things I do not understand as well. Because I am not God. This is where faith comes in.
I know where you are at, I was like that once too. The only thing that you need to do is to submit to God. Otherwise you will be fighting him your whole life. Do you want to fight God your whole life, and perhaps for eternity? Don't reject him. I pray that you don't.
@Preston Swan So if God creates you, and tells you not to do "x". And you do "x". You don't think it's just for God to punish you?
As for the "punishing everyone" argument. I am very sympathetic to that argument, it doesn't seem fair on the surface. But then again it was God's curse on Adam's seed (all of mankind). That curse was the punishment for Adam's sin.
Again, it goes back to what we were talking about before -- that's how terrible sinning against a holy and perfect God really is. Yes, it's a terrible punishment. I agree with you there. But that's the point.
@@HasanUnknown Nope, Jesus was the Son of God, He referred to himself as "I AM" which is a claim to diety. Anything claiming He is less is from the spirit of the anti Christ
I was watching your videos with Ken Ham. I know it’s tedious data research, but this is one of the most profoundly effective lines of reason backed by bullet proof data in support for the Biblical timeline. I would love to add a punchy video like this to my website
I fear the information in the video leaves out too much to try to support the worship of man and belittle the greatness of God's creation. If the universe was as new as they were. Saying we wouldn't have ever seen a supernova since at the speed of light the nova's light would not have had time to reach earth.
Too often we want to belittle God by making God in our image and claim God only created the universe for us.
@@billydavis4252 The speed of light is not actually a constant, as it was once taught. Not to mention we have proven Einstein’s theory of relativity a couple different ways since it’s conception.
If you visit my website and go to the first creation page, there is a space section that goes over how we can see light so far away.
In a nutshell, time is directly related to the presence of gravity, where there is little to no gravity, there is little to no time. This greatly changes previously “known” biases.
@@ithasbeenwritten222 Your assertion regarding time without gravity doesn't align to verifiable evidence.
We still are stuck with the effort to bend facts to fit God into limits that support human centric ideas. There is no reason to assume the Bible is flawless since a completely flawed human perception of God doesn't discount God. I understand the need to make ourselves innately special; but it still seems extremely odd for God to create a whole universe and only have one tiny planet or one lifeform that God is interested in.
@@billydavis4252 Well it’s not my assertion it’s Einstein’s theory of general relativity that has been proven with the LIGO test lab as well as the clocks on atomic satellites.
You can go learn or not, it is entirely up to you.
@@Bomtombadi1 bullet proof so that anyone who doesn't believe it will have an impossible task proving it wrong.
God bless AIG ❤️ Much love in Christ
Such a well run vlog! Thanks for your deep research and the smooth show.
I wish the best for all who take the time and effort to clarify others on such important matters as those related to human genetics.
Thank you for all of your hard work. I have to watch these videos two or three times but I understand where you're going with it.
I think I need to watch a couple more times too.
I got interrupted and had to go back, I picked it up better second time as I had a couple of hours break.
Science in this study is testable.
"Millions of years ago" is absolutely untestable, making it fit the definition of a religion.
Yes, I will have to watch it several times too!
As a person very involved with the Special Needs community, I meet a lot of people with 'A Genetic Defect' which will create learning delay, speech problems, muscles either to rigid or too soft, vision etc in the child , Their parents think evolution (DNA improving through mutation) is laughable
New book: Relegating Darwinism to the Garbage Heap...
I have watched all of Dr. Jeanson's videos that I have found. I love his work. I understand very little of it, but find it very interesting, and love seeing science continue to prove God's word true!
Great, if Dr. Jeanson is right then geneticists will know the truth soon, and all scientists will be clamoring for Nobel prize for Dr. Jeanson.
And, of course all science classs will be teaching creation. But Dr. Jeanson will have to provide bit larger data sets than less than half dozen incidents out of many billion people.
It's really not.
Also... "Creation science research, based upon genealogies in Genesis 10, demonstrates young earth timelines in groundbreaking DNA discoveries. " should be rewritten as
Our internal spin doctors, based on a backstory in a book of fiction, talks of a fictional world in misrepresented DNA discoveries.
thanks again for your hard work Dr. Jeason!
The one question that has always made me curious is. Why didn't Noah swat the mosquitos? I really love this series of videos. I am going to buy both of your books. Thank you for all the hard work you've put into this project.
The birds need the mosquitos for food.
***those book are crap, save your money.***
Great video!
Also, just ignore the desperate trolls in the comments.
God left fingerprints on every one of us.. Haplotype I-M170.
I wish all schools had this book. Every single school and library on earth.
There’s one simple observation that shows young earth creationism is seriously flawed. I’ve been following this topic for almost 3 decades. In that time I have seen those on the young earth side in constant retreat. That is, they espouse an argument for a time until it becomes untenable, then they retreat to a more obscure topic and hold their ground until that one becomes untenable, and so on. All the while science slowly trods forward breaking new ground and reinforcing old ground. It’s clear who’s going to win this…actually it’s already been won, the creationists just don’t know it yet.
I don't know how someone making an honest assessment can reach this conclusion. So called "junk DNA" itself disproves your premise. How many years of progress was halted because atheists assumed there was an abundance of useless DNA in our genome. Whoops
@@davissalaki8703. There *is* DNA in our genome that has no utility to us. And your comment actually says nothing about my premise - which is a fact obvious to anyone whose followed this topic for decades.
That is not even close to being science.
Thank you, Brother Nate, for doing the work it is amazing!
Because of the 100-200 new mutations that are alleged to being added into our bodies every generation (on average), I find it hard for humans to still exist, if humans really began 3-4 millions yrs ago (i.e. "the Dawn of Mankind"), as evolutionists say.
That fact is that mutations since Adam was created genetically perfect have resulted in the human genome "devolving" if I may use the term ...genetically. Humans today are much less genetically fit than were our ancestors. That being the complete opposite of what science denier evolutionists state.
@@globalcoupledances No, creationists believe the most mutations expressed are bad and cause the information in the genome to decrease...which is true....yet mutations cannot cause new species to form within an existing genome because DNA coding limits an organism's variation to within the species but does not allow the creation of a new species. This has been scientifically proven.
@@globalcoupledances You don't seem to understand, the human genome is getting genetically weaker no matter what we as a species do...because information is being lost and new information is not being added. It certainly is not getting stronger. This has been repeatedly verified. It puts the lie to evolution from the start. Micro-evolution aka genetic variation just means that different genetic traits can be expressed within the limits of the DNA coding for that species. No new DNA information is being formed to create a new species aka Macro Evolution...it is a myth.
Jesus Christ is coming SOON BE READY MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS!!!#Jesus.is.the.WAY
Finally! What I've felt and suspected for a long time.
I bet this Dr. would destroy anyone who debated him (Bill Nye)
He's done a few debates, and yes I thought he handled them quite well. One was with Herman Mayz, which was a waste of time because it became evident Mayz didn't actually read the book (Replacing Darwin) and never had any intention of seriously debating him, just ridiculing. There was also an impromptu debate with the CreationMyths guy on an episode of "Apologetics Live" with Rappaport. Check it out.
It would be no competition between Dr. Jeanson, scientist, and Mr. Bill Nye, layman.
@@joshuakarr-BibleMan I'd be more interested in another debate with the CreationMyths guy. He's an evolutionary biologist and even though he also has resorted to ridiculous strawman arguments and ridicule, at least he has been actively responding to Jeansons work unlike most of the rest of the evolutionist community which largely ignores him or just ridicules him without bothering to actually read or understand what Jeanson is saying.
Bill Nye is a mechanic by training, he has above a trade school knowledge, but he is not a scientist
I would like to see him debate AronRa or Forrest Valkai. They both have TH-cam channels.
Praying for truth and justice and victory in JESUS HOLY NAME 💖✝️🕊🇺🇸💙🙏🙏🙏
Amen brothers!!!
I truly enjoy this research, wonderful to be able to prove God's existence in His creation...Thank you for sharing your God given gifts with the world to honor God's Glory in all of it. Amen! God Bless!
There is no proof of God, and if you believe there is you do not base your belief on faith/
Jeanson's idea's is easily dismissed due to research on populations on Tristan da cuna and Canaries.
What Jeanson suggest is not in line with what we observe in the real world.
Yes and research on Aboriginal Australians just blows his crap right out of the water!
I can see how this took a long time. Watching more again.
The idea that God, in all his omniscience, would have bothered to wait for millions or billions of years for the universe to evolve when He holds the key to time amongst all things, is hysterical! In fact, I do believe God would consider it a sin to waste so much time!
When do you believe "the flood" occurred?
I am a practicing Catholic and love all your videos. God bless.
I too am a practicing Catholic. Did you know that it was our church that invented scientific method and theory? Science was born in Catholic Monasteries where monks had a lot of time on their hands. Our Church accepts the scientific theories about creation and evolution. They say that science tells us HOW IT HAPPENED. The Church tells us WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
@@efandmk3382 Science on ly came free when the thinkers left the Pope Cult and were free to study nature without the threat of execution for heresy and blasphemy.
Wow I wish more catholics were this biblical minded enough to watch this stuff like you. Im happy you are here!
Catholicism is not Christianity.
Your pope wants to join Catholicism, Mormonism, Islam and Judaism into one religion. Do you approve of that? Because, I don't.
Always happy to see more from Dr. Jeanson 👍
Yes is better to reason from effect to cause and then we can make predictions, when I see smoke it's reasonable to expect fire now and in the future. I'm a physician and biology is familiar to me.
I really appreciated this presentation already for the second or third time. I find the conclusions of this study solid and believe they will be repeatedly confirmed in the future.
i do not.
The fact that 295,800 year old human footprints exist in Spain should tell you something about the claims that humanity is only 6,000 years old, but I suspect it won't. The phrase "scientific creationism" is an oxymoron, i.e., a contradiction in terms. It is simply religion masquerading as science.
Recently I came across the history of the Masorectic text which said the Jewish rabbis adapted the timeline by dropping off 100 years in the birth of many first sons in order to argue that Shem was actually Melchizedek as he was still living if these gaps are reduced from 130 at the birth to 30 years old. This seems to be supported by the earlier LXX and the dead Sea Scrolls source making the Masorectic timeframes
off by some 750 years or more.
I tend to accept this as the older date for the Exodus seems to confirm with the finding of the Joshua curse enevoples (tiny tables
and iron pencils on mt. Ebal.
Surely the Masorectic text is less reliable having been written in the Common Era.
Thanks for your courage. Interesting how the opening chart looks like a city skyline...
God Bless you Dr Nathaniel.
Excited to see the completed DNA tree matched up with the development of language. Got an Idea that the branch of Linguistics might have a few surprises. And would also add further proofs. Especially in the development of proto languages. God is the mastermind muhahaha!!!
When God created Adam, he was a man. He was not a baby that God had to raise to adulthood. Why do we not connect that with the creation of the earth. Secular scientists think the earth is billions of years old. God created an earth that was already "established" it was billions of years old from creation!
How does this relate to the oldest Homo sapiens DNA being pushed back over a hundred thousand years to over 315,000 years ago? You both can’t be right
This is very exciting. Thank you Lord. For this evidence, for this research, and for Nathaniel!
His research hasn’t been reviewed by anyone because it’s produced by a religious institution and doesn’t adhere to the standards of research. This is BS science presented to an uneducated audience to push their narrative.
Awesome, thank you !👆👍
Intriguing.
Fantastic exposition of genetic detective work. As with all things, God leaves clues in His creation to "trace" his Glory.
At least 10 years ago I commented somewhere online that the creation account would eventually be proven by genetics. Of course, some know-it-all jumped in to say genetics proves Darwinism. So now the methods that will eventually prove creationism are being worked out. It remains to be seen how scientists who have been weaned on Darwinism will be able to grasp the truth when it is presented to them.
As long as this is assured blessing for believers (and our children)
then we have done our jobs I think.
Dont forget to beat your slaves per the holy bible. You have to beat them the right way that god says or he might take it out on the masters.
I've been trying to buy Nathaniel's book "Replacing Darwin" for months now on Amazon and it's been "delayed". Now they've given me a refund and they're not giving me the book! I can't find it in the bookstore either. Why can't I get this book???
@@lambythelamb97 They sent me Traced 🤷♀️
Book printing in general is still recovering from pandemic supply chain issues. I would suggest buying directly from aig (they're usually cheaper than Amazon anyway). Plus you might be able to get a digital version to read while you wait for the hardcopy. Good luck.
@@FiREfaiRY1441 please don't buy into this nonsense, evolution has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt
@@SergyMilitaryRankings Troll. You do realize we can see your replies in this channel, right?
Buy directly from Answers in Genesis.
Great Stuff!
Fantastic video.At 65 yrs male,I have learnt so much scientific proof that collates what the bible says.I can now put up correcting evolutionists which have no answer.EG:-most people believe there is a devil so there must be GOD.😎👍😇Australia
This is a fantastic analysis, and a tremendous contribution to the understanding of our origins, but it must be peer reviewed and argued before it can be considered a Theory. Therefore I would like to hear debates.
Yeah, I'd love to see this peer reviewed as well! What would be hilarious
@@globalcoupledances a review is not yo the standard of peer reviewed work. If you want your ideas accepted it is a path that must be taken. That is if you believe your work is relevant
All glory to God ❤ ❤❤
This may go over my head, but I think this is a book for my personal library. Great work. I look forward to finding Adam.
You will always find reasons to believe what you are motivated to believe. There are serious consequences to believing what you want to believe.
Indeed there are.
God Bless you All...
God condones slavery in the bible over and over. Do you believe it?
@@Gary-fq8cx
Is slavery wrong ?
@@sparkyy0007 I dont know if your serious or just trolling. As if you dont know the answer to that question.
@@Gary-fq8cx
Not about me or what I presume to know, YOU brought it up.
You think slavery is wrong...why ?
Great work; compelling science!
Hallelujah [Yshua ha Moshiach]
Jah Bless
So how does this method explain the burial discovery of 3 modern humans dated to 23,000 years ago in Czechoslavacia .
Curious...
He said that the mutations would be so many that the species could not survive. That made me wonder...can we extrapolate the data to see how long man could survive physically based on this DNA mutation?
That sounds like a fair question.
Along a similar line, what makes him think any given change would be detrimental?
After the Flood, lifespans decreased precipitously, and in about five generations they reached about what they are today, 4000 years later.
I don't even know whether calling a change between generations a mistake or a mutation is spiritually accurate.
God has so many different colors and girths and heights of people, it becomes obvious He delights in variation on a theme.
Is a son's difference to his father really a mistake?
To be fair though, I can understand there is a burden of jargon in his field, and my layman's objection is irrelevant to the meaning of the total statement he makes.
@@joshuakarr-BibleMan The way I see it, the word mistake is the problem here. It generally indicates something going wrong. Well, in the case of our cursed world, something did go wrong, and entropy was the result.
DNA is supposed to replicate itself exactly. When it does not, that is being called a mistake. The fact is, it was not replicated perfectly.
The mixing of two parents' DNA is how God expresses His creativity in all the differences, which I enjoy. What is going on here is not that. It is a piece of evidence that we live in a world cursed by sin.
So, is it a "mistake?" Well, yes and no. LOL In light of perfection in creation, they are mistakes. But, God designed us such that sin would cause us to start making these "mistakes" for the purpose of reminding us we were not created for this world in the first place.
We are not being restored to Eden. We are moving on to better things.
Hey, thanks for the reply! And, the wonderful use of whitespace to make it easier to read!
Amen, brother.
The strange thing is that evolutionists talk about mutations as faults, also. From what?
If they were correct, then there isn't any starting ground of non corrupted information from which mistakes take off from. Every bit of information in the DNA is nothing but mutations.
Where do they think they get the place from that marks between what is a mutation, and is the base from which it came? I'd like to know.
@@jimtomczak7374 Oh, well, if you are going to bring logic and reason into it! LOL
Yeah, that does sort of get to the point of the matter (matter...no pun intended...but I did chuckle at it) is that an evolutionist cannot say that anything at all is either good or bad. They step on our ground to do so. Love it!
Hi Nathaniel, have you found any DNA genomes for the Nephilim amongst your data, it is known that they had children by humans so their DNA should be somewhere in the data. I'd be interested to know the answer.
There is a theory out there that Noah's family was the only family that hadn't been tainted by the Nephilim over time and one of the main reasons God sent the flood.
Neanderthals. Also called the "jotunn" in northern European myths. You can also look up David Paulides of Missing 411 to find a strong link between "sasquatch" and the Nephilim. As a former police detective who retired to become a private investigator, Paulides and his team professionally gathered hair and DNA samples. They passed it to Dr. Melba Ketchum, who had it tested her lab, and it's currently being tested in other labs for corroboration. The "sasquatch" DNA shows that their female ancestry is human, but their male ancestry is "unknown." Their hair is also completely unlike any known human hair or animal hair.
Judging by the amount of flak Paulides and Dr. Ketchum are catching from all sides (both the Bigfoot crowd and the anti-Bigfoot crowd), I'd say they're right over the target. It's also important to know that two Native American sheriffs spoke at a law enforcement conference four or five years ago, and presented all their evidence that sasquatch is real, but supernatural, and capable of leaving a half footprint as it vanishes into thin air ("like it jumped to the moon"). The video of their presentation was on TH-cam, but I can no longer find it. Occasionally I find other people who saw the video, but they can't find it either.
the nephilim were sterile because they were hybrids.Similar to breeding a horse to a donkey.The result is a mule that is sterile.The nephilim all perished during the flood.
@@wuffa4503 Not all hybrids are sterile. Some mules can breed. It's rare, but can be selected for. My mother's family were "muleskinners" (breeders, trainers, and leatherworkers for mules). Now imagine how advanced and flexible hybrids would be if made with the assistance of fallen angels.
Is there any access to the family trees or timelines on a PDF or something?
In the book itself I believe
All knowledge is bulletproof until it is tested and refined.
There are debates online featuring Answers in Genesis, Biola University, Reasons to Believe and atheists.
Around two years ago in a tomb in Jerusalem written in ancient Hebrew the name of God (YWHW) was found written on a couple of silver scrolls. Proving the possession of the land by the Israeli's in antiquity Instead of quieting criticisms about God or Jews ever having possession of Jerusalem in a kingdom they owned and ruled the evidence has been kept from the general public of the world. Thankfully God has been faithful in fighting for his namesake and providing foundation stones for his people to stand on if they will just believe. Thank you for presenting this information to help us overcome the confusion of misguided "science" that is assaulting the world today. Those grafted into the true vine must prepare as "the prophecies of the end of the age" are ever nearer and are bearing fruit. Many false doctrines have infiltrated "sound doctrine" since the time of Christ's time on earth just like they did about and before his first coming. Yisrael is about to be expelled from the lands of their exile by the call of YWHW to the land of promise and the Lord's second coming and the trials and judgment of the nations from which there is no escape. Pray the lord of the harvest to send in laborers.
Thanks 🙏 for your hard work!
Exactly. More to go!!
Doctrine would instate outcomes over a period of evil rule of any country becomes damned. In the end it is as you read in the great book. I'm sure we all know now it's hard to protest conversations anywhere. Lol. Yes lol. They don't like truth to the Date it was a proverb. Actually our enemy who wants to be the accused in all proverbs biblically in our eyes would be ANTICHRIST. there. " No escape but fighting would be as Jesus threw out gamblers from his own temple" to be killed later! This seems to me as a promise of spiritual WAR not personal conflict. In the old days teachers would be burnt at the stake for trans anything. But we say every single person gets to make their own minds up. How I believe as a MAN you all do not ""DO NOT NEED TO KNOW MY PERSONAL FIGHTS""". So, maybe we are socialites
Um. Without Jesus 🙏
Like who doesn't realize Jesus disappeared from home for those 40 days and nights. He was good travel company regardless of our savior. Obviously I've misplaced one or two Great people in his name before just like an atheist friend I had.
I would not want to be the ONLY ADAM left
Is the rh negative blood type a mutation? What time period does it show up in?
Yes, blood types could help the study of migrations which is like a third family tree lineage.
You should be questioning the blood type of the vaxxed
13 February, 1970 Black Sabbath releases their self titled album and give birth to the known universe.
Awesome sir! My only concern from your initial few episodes was a scientific correlation between the changes you are charting and some different model. These graphics portray, in my opinion, an excellent contrast of your theory's correlation versus Darwinian evolution.
They want to say we evolved over billions of years but they have no way to prove the accuracy of their carbon dating. As a math major, I learned about differential equations, which is what they use to calculate exponential growth and decay, and basically, they use a half-life method and extrapolate what they have to calculate how old it is, but it seems very facile. A dead animal left in nature can decompose very quickly if mold gets it and over time there's literally nothing left. What's to say the preserved fossil didn't just decompose completely in the substances containing it? The math only assumes that the rate of change is exponentially constant. How much of the specific carbon do we have and how do we know how much was originally there? There's just so many missed variables and I don't think the veracity of the method is tenable.
Take a chemistry course and some physics. Educate yourself. ..
@@rahowherox1177 what a great argument you have
@@ignantxxxninja ? Beats the argument of personal incredulity every time.
@@ignantxxxninja also, if statistics and statistical analysis are part of your "maths", you can apply the "ideals" to the nonsen... er data presented on this vid.
@@rahowherox1177 it's not incredulity if it's not proven to be true beyond all doubt. You're not exactly making a point against the case that I'm making, and I'm not going to make an argument for what's presented in this video. You're attacking a strawman if you're not making a case against my argument.
Can you recommend any single video with all of this crammed into one punchy video for me to share at my site?
If what Dr Jeanson is saying is true, he should submit his findings for peer review and collect his Nobel prize. Better to sell books than get shot down by peer review.🙄
These videos are all extremely useful but we need to be mainly preaching the gospel, not mainly providing the scientific age of creation
No matter what negative comments are posted about this video, Notice how the Biblical view can't be refuted by you.
ok. next, refute dinosaur timelines.
Trey Smith does.
That is simple.... Radio dating methods are inaccurate.
The daughter isotopes at rock solidification is automatically assumed to be 0 when every modern sample proves otherwise.
As igneous rock (lava rock) cools the amount of daughter isotope left in the rock varies because the time it takes to cool and solidify varies. ( atmospheric temperature and pressure, was it on land, under water, was it raining, all of these things could alter daughter isotope levels by the time of solidification.
Without knowing the exact starting ratio no math can find the date. It could give you the oldest possible date but not the actual date.
@Dark Yellow Pages, your name is hilarious.
Also, God loves you and wants for you to be saved from Hell.
Recognize your sins (we all have them) and ask Jesus to forgive you, so the Father doesn't have to destroy your soul in Hell.
Yes, it's amazing how many denominations just focus on Jesus Christ and allegorize away Genesis and end times prophecy/Revelation. Most churches are really missing out on an opportunity to pull communities closer together and unite under young earth ministries like Answers in Genisis. I've found a few pastors that teach a verse by verse literal interpretation of our Bible and it's brought me so much peace and understanding. Since I was a child I've struggled with the theory of evolution and our Bible. The question "which is true?" was always in my thoughts and heart. Then the gap theory became known to me. But once I looked into that, I realized it was just a Dawinian attempt to cram liberal nonsense down peoples throats. After I came across these young earth ministries that focused on a literal interpretation of the Bible and so much suppressed evidence that supports it, did I realize that we are being duped by our media, government, and secular school systems. They have been infiltrated by Satan. And they are successfully brainwashing many. But NOT this guy! And I hope that many others see the light SOON before the door shuts on them.
We are not all of biblical record, this man is quite lost in generalised globalism. Adam means ruddy, which group is considered ruddy, showing blood in the face?
So you want a literal interpretation? The bible condones slavery. Are we to take that literally or will you ignore it and make excuses? 😒
Wait, can you explain the neanderthal DNA exclusion again? I think I understood it as "including the DNA doesn't match known human history"?
theres no neanderthal they are just pre flood man
From a creationist perspective, neanderthal DNA would be some of the oldest possible to exist, whereas evolutionists see it as old, but much closer to us relatively speaking with many many generations preceding it. That matters because we creationists would say ancient DNA isn't going to be very useful helping us look backwards because it's pretty much at the starting point. I reserve the right to be incorrect, but I think Dr. Jeansen is just saying that plugging in ancient DNA in an evolutionary timeframe doesn't match the population trends like looking back with modern data does.
The time clock didn't start until Adam left Eden. Before that his age didn't matter, because he was eating from the tree of life. Nobody knows how long Adam lived before that.
You actually believe that God created a man named Adam first and he wandered the Earth alone for an undefined time?
@@482jpsquared you need to read Genesis. Adam was in the Garden and so was Eve. They didn't wander the Earth. They lived in the Garden. The Bible makes that pretty clear.
For those of who have read and believe God's Word, this comes as no surprise