I remember clearly the day I was reading the event of the wedding at Cana ( John 2:1-11 ) I had read this story many times over the years but this time the Holy Spirit asked me a question: "How long did it take the Creator of all things to make wine for a wedding?" This was the turning point for me in my full acceptance of the historicity of the creation account of Genesis. (I was still trying to reason out as thousand year days) Of course the follow up questions include "How long did it take Him to create full grown ready to eat fish and baked bread to feed thousands with leftovers?" This new grounding in God's Truth was/is one of the most freeing of Truths. If we can't believe what God says about the past, which has happened, how can we believe what He says about the future, which has not yet happened? And how can you believe what He has said of His salvation? I'll leave you with this word from Jesus; John 3:12 "If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?"
@@speciesspeciate6429 the first chapter states that living organisms were created to produce after their own kind. That's exactly what we observe every moment of every day. That has not and cannot be disproven. Please don't deny legitimate history. Accept Christ as Lord and Savior.
@@speciesspeciate6429 no way, man! The ark has been found.. again and again and again and again.. what, you don't trust Ron Wyatt and people like that? :-)
The Writings of Tanach were the only “scriptures” that Shaul/Paul had. Mark Zook went to PNG to share the good message of God with the Mouk tribe, but when he started teaching the “New Testament” [sic], he kept running into problems. References were continually made to historical events and people in Tanach, and he had to keep backtracking to explain who these people were. He finally realized that he needed to start at the beginning, to lay the foundation, which he did. His story is told in the video Ee Taow, available free on TH-cam. “True liberty is the freedom to do what is right, not the right to do what is wrong.” (Deanne R. Sanville) This was an excellent interview. I expect to see Brian next weekend in New Hampshire. :)
If a person rejects Jesus Christ, they will also reject TRUTH because Jesus said He is the way, the TRUTH and the Life! In Him is literal life because He is the creator of life!
@@Forgivenmuchlovingmuch "If a person rejects Jesus Christ, they will also reject TRUTH because Jesus said He is the TRUTH" is circular reasoning. It's logically fallacious.
@@speciesspeciate6429 Allow me to expound the emphasis to my statement. When we reject Jesus Christ (His person), we simultaneously reject the truth claims He made, specifically to creation and Him being the one by whom all things were created and by whom all things exist. The video is about Genesis. I’m not saying a person who rejects Jesus will also not believe “any” truth out there, like speeding over the limit could get you a traffic fine. It’s about The Truth of creation , why the world exists and how the world the made. This is the Truth that is found in Jesus.
If you haven't seen any videos from the TruthisChrist channel on TH-cam you absolutely need to!!! Prepare to be amazed further than you could ever imagine at the awesome power and glory of Jesus through his Word! Amen!
Genesis is crucial because it gives us the beginning of everything. The overriding theme of Genesis is God’s eternal existence and His creation of the world. There is no effort on the part of the author to defend the existence of God; he simply states that God is, always was, and always will be, almighty over all. In the same way, we have confidence in the truths of Genesis, despite the claims of those who would deny them. All people, regardless of culture, nationality or language, are accountable to the Creator. But because of sin, introduced into the world at the Fall, we are separated from Him. But through one small nation, Israel, God’s redemptive plan for mankind was revealed and made available to all through Jesus Christ.
Colossians 1:16-20 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. 19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; 20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
When you read the books of the New Testament you have probably asked yourself many times: "Why is it that for 2000 years we have not seen the miracles that accompanied the Church of Christ in the first century as the New Testament describes them? Why is it that so-called preachers of Christ have to prove that Jesus really existed, while atheists have the audacity to deny the historicity or divine origin of Christ? Maybe because the Church of Christ ceased to exist after the first century. There is no Church as it is described in the books of the New Testament, but there are Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and other Christian sects, claiming to be the Church, but not having that one thing that distinguishes the divine from the human and is characteristic only for the Church of Christ - the backing of the word with signs, that is, miracles (Mk 16:15-20). That is why part of the researchers doubt the historicity of Christ, and part of them do not mind to declare Him a real person, but an ordinary philosopher, a teacher. But even if Jesus was an ordinary philosopher, His disciples would have been ordinary followers of Jesus. And they would not have dared to write about the miracles that not only Jesus but also His disciples could perform. If in our time there were a Church as described by the authors of the New Testament books, where miracles are performed - healing the sick, prophesying, raising the dead - no one would doubt the historicity of Christ. Then all over the world there would be the same disputes as in the first century - Jesus is the Son of God or a false prophet who seduces the world with miracles. Find on youtube the message *"The Mystery of the Church of Christ"* . It reveals the prophecy of the disappearance and reappearance of the Church of Christ before the End of the World, giving hope to all who are sincerely seeking God and who are not lazy to think freely.
Colossians 1:16-20 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. 19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; 20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
So I'm quite interested in the ideas behind a young earth and supporting genesis. However i found this video to be very lacking, the ideas put forward weren't really explained or supported. Arguments that the bible exists and that god exists therefor are bootstrapping and won't really work for people who don't already subscribe to that worldview. Compatibilism is also a potential option, old earth but Jesus is still god. Ultimately you say that the evolutionists can't go back in time to see things, but then neither can you. There are problems with the speed of light and how we can see stars so far away if there is a young universe. I also have problems with evolutionary points of view. Logical arguments are interesting, i.e. the cosmological argument and the argument from design but they support gods existence not necessarily a young earth. I would have thought you would have some really good ideas for why the earth is young, some of these were fleetingly mentioned i.e. that Jupiter is hot but i don't think that the point of view was really explained properly and its probably a straw man argument. I would prefer better details. I am a believer myself, but your arguments of oh well its written in genesis therefor we should just accept it.... If its really the truth is should stand up to scrutiny, there should be no fear in actually examining the details. Also if that part of the bible is myth, it still does not take away from the symbolism and the larger ideas of the bible and of course the central character of Jesus.
ICR is primarily concerned with observational science and has many videos and articles on the science of creation that you obviously have not watched or read because they give many obvious truths that support the Earth's and the universe's young age. This is more of a testimonial video. when you realize the theory of evolution is just another atheist-enforced anti-biblical replacement narrative for the creation, things will start to make sense. bottom line is, that science can not prove the age of the earth directly. there is no direct measurement. if you like logical arguments read the RATE literature (Radiometric dating and the Age of the Earth). Light travel problem again! The horizon problem for secularists is as much a light travel problem for them. There hasn't been enough evolutionary time for heat to travel from one end of the universe to the other (it's too uniform) if the creation is as young as they say (What is it now 13.4 Billion years). Not enough time for that either! we creationists don't have all the answers but the observations we do have, better fit the biblical narrative. Do you think there was a worldwide flood? there are plenty of observations that support the biblical narrative for Noahs flood. We don't see landforms like the ones we see, forming today. something very different happened in the past. that's obvious! good luck with your studies.
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours) Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
@@rm2h That is only half the story. YEC, Young Earth Christians, claim days 1 to 6 in Gen are only 24 hours. YEC are WRONG on both counts. 1) The genealogies are adequate but not complete. No matter how you read the genealogies, you must concede that there are gaps. Also Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English. Thus genealogical terms like “son” and “father” have much broader meanings than their corresponding English words. Thus “son” (ben, 1121) means son, grandson, great grandson, and descendent. Similarly, “father” (ab, 1) means father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and ancestor. 2) Day in Gen is not 24 hours. Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours) Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” referring to the whole time of the six days, The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
Does an automobile or aircraft prove an engineer? Yes! Scientifically you cannot prove there is not a God because God exists outside our dimension and is the cause, of the effect (the creation). Looking at the effect of a 747 you would never say, "Wow! How did the parts come about and how did that thing assemble itself on its own"? Science is simply a methodology for investigating the existing creation. You can not scientifically prove the Big Bang or abiogenesis either but I'm sure you believe that. be honest already! The engineering in living things, the precise parameters of the universe, and the information in life, (DNA) all cannot create itself piecemeal. The existence of a designer is a far more rational point of view. the results of the James Webb telescope surprised secularists. They didn't surprise us creationists. Dr. Jason Lisle accurately predicted what they would find.
Would you mind referencing anybody demonstrating the prebiotic chemistry required for a single protein or gene to form? Verifying our "mother" could actually be a perfectly sterile, barren, virgin, dumb as rock, warm little pond, primordial soup or whatever? Please, so I can be an intellectually satisfied atheist like you? I'm not convinced the 200 different types of the 37 trillion cells arranged in my body are evidence of a mindless process of trial and error.
A young universe??? no. Genesis 1 is about the creation of the surface of the earth. God's creative acts in Genesis 1 are when He speaks. He speaks light on Day 1. All else was created earlier. Dat 4, has an aside, "He made the stars also". This makes a possible understanding that He is claiming creatorship for the Universe, but He didn't speak it into existence on Day 4. So, it is logical, acceptable and consistent with true science to have a young earth (around 6000 years ago), surface created in 6 days, and an old Universe, so old we can not fathom the past ages! I have no problem with Scriptural truth and observable, good scientific understanding with global catastrophism with the Genesis flood.
Well they have evidence that says otherwise. And not to mention the law of biogenesis life can only come from life. Which disproves the nonliving chemicals could give rise to life. Christian scientist disprove spontaneous generation. His name was Lewis Pastor I think.
I remember clearly the day I was reading the event of the wedding at Cana ( John 2:1-11 ) I had read this story many times over the years but this time the Holy Spirit asked me a question: "How long did it take the Creator of all things to make wine for a wedding?" This was the turning point for me in my full acceptance of the historicity of the creation account of Genesis. (I was still trying to reason out as thousand year days) Of course the follow up questions include "How long did it take Him to create full grown ready to eat fish and baked bread to feed thousands with leftovers?"
This new grounding in God's Truth was/is one of the most freeing of Truths.
If we can't believe what God says about the past, which has happened, how can we believe what He says about the future, which has not yet happened? And how can you believe what He has said of His salvation?
I'll leave you with this word from Jesus; John 3:12 "If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?"
Well said and Holy Spirit led!
There is NO Gospel without Genesis. Yeshua validated it; the TANAKH is what He used exclusively to explain His presence and actions. See Luke 24.
Genesis is legitimate history. Rejecting scripture is illegitimate denial of history.
Real Noah’s ark has been rediscovered
YT Noah’s Ark data
@@Rom3_29 Lol. That has been proven to be rock and mud in the vague shape of a boat.
@@poliincredible770 It's not even remotely close to legitimate history. The book of Genesis has been repeatedly and conclusively disproved.
@@speciesspeciate6429 the first chapter states that living organisms were created to produce after their own kind. That's exactly what we observe every moment of every day. That has not and cannot be disproven. Please don't deny legitimate history. Accept Christ as Lord and Savior.
@@speciesspeciate6429 no way, man! The ark has been found.. again and again and again and again.. what, you don't trust Ron Wyatt and people like that? :-)
The Writings of Tanach were the only “scriptures” that Shaul/Paul had.
Mark Zook went to PNG to share the good message of God with the Mouk tribe, but when he started teaching the “New Testament” [sic], he kept running into problems. References were continually made to historical events and people in Tanach, and he had to keep backtracking to explain who these people were. He finally realized that he needed to start at the beginning, to lay the foundation, which he did. His story is told in the video Ee Taow, available free on TH-cam.
“True liberty is the freedom to do what is right,
not the right to do what is wrong.”
(Deanne R. Sanville)
This was an excellent interview. I expect to see Brian next weekend in New Hampshire. :)
Loved the book! A must read.
Very cool ❤thanks for sharing 😊
If a person rejects Jesus Christ, they will also reject TRUTH because Jesus said He is the way, the TRUTH and the Life! In Him is literal life because He is the creator of life!
@@Forgivenmuchlovingmuch Do you understand that you committed a logical fallacy?
@@speciesspeciate6429 I understand that I have the right to appeal to the Judge of the earth and He alone is my defense and justifier.
@@Forgivenmuchlovingmuch "If a person rejects Jesus Christ, they will also reject TRUTH because Jesus said He is the TRUTH" is circular reasoning. It's logically fallacious.
@@speciesspeciate6429 Allow me to expound the emphasis to my statement. When we reject Jesus Christ (His person), we simultaneously reject the truth claims He made, specifically to creation and Him being the one by whom all things were created and by whom all things exist. The video is about Genesis. I’m not saying a person who rejects Jesus will also not believe “any” truth out there, like speeding over the limit could get you a traffic fine. It’s about The Truth of creation , why the world exists and how the world the made. This is the Truth that is found in Jesus.
@Forgivenmuchlovingmuch It's the same as saying that Lord of the Rings is proof that Frodo went to Mordor because it says so in the book.
If you haven't seen any videos from the TruthisChrist channel on TH-cam you absolutely need to!!! Prepare to be amazed further than you could ever imagine at the awesome power and glory of Jesus through his Word! Amen!
Genesis is crucial because it gives us the beginning of everything.
The overriding theme of Genesis is God’s eternal existence and His creation of the world. There is no effort on the part of the author to defend the existence of God; he simply states that God is, always was, and always will be, almighty over all. In the same way, we have confidence in the truths of Genesis, despite the claims of those who would deny them. All people, regardless of culture, nationality or language, are accountable to the Creator. But because of sin, introduced into the world at the Fall, we are separated from Him. But through one small nation, Israel, God’s redemptive plan for mankind was revealed and made available to all through Jesus Christ.
Didn't the channel "Testify" just post the same video a few weeks ago?
Colossians 1:16-20
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
scientific data fit with Genesis
What data?
@@georg7120 scientific data
@@georg7120 scientific data fit with Genesis
@@HS-zk5nn What data? You don't know examples?
@@georg7120 all the scientific data.
When you read the books of the New Testament you have probably asked yourself many times: "Why is it that for 2000 years we have not seen the miracles that accompanied the Church of Christ in the first century as the New Testament describes them? Why is it that so-called preachers of Christ have to prove that Jesus really existed, while atheists have the audacity to deny the historicity or divine origin of Christ? Maybe because the Church of Christ ceased to exist after the first century. There is no Church as it is described in the books of the New Testament, but there are Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and other Christian sects, claiming to be the Church, but not having that one thing that distinguishes the divine from the human and is characteristic only for the Church of Christ - the backing of the word with signs, that is, miracles (Mk 16:15-20). That is why part of the researchers doubt the historicity of Christ, and part of them do not mind to declare Him a real person, but an ordinary philosopher, a teacher. But even if Jesus was an ordinary philosopher, His disciples would have been ordinary followers of Jesus. And they would not have dared to write about the miracles that not only Jesus but also His disciples could perform. If in our time there were a Church as described by the authors of the New Testament books, where miracles are performed - healing the sick, prophesying, raising the dead - no one would doubt the historicity of Christ. Then all over the world there would be the same disputes as in the first century - Jesus is the Son of God or a false prophet who seduces the world with miracles.
Find on youtube the message *"The Mystery of the Church of Christ"* . It reveals the prophecy of the disappearance and reappearance of the Church of Christ before the End of the World, giving hope to all who are sincerely seeking God and who are not lazy to think freely.
It doesn't matter when you believe in Jesus.
Colossians 1:16-20
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
Was your reference to "Buckwheat" understood by anyone under 50 years old?
So I'm quite interested in the ideas behind a young earth and supporting genesis. However i found this video to be very lacking, the ideas put forward weren't really explained or supported. Arguments that the bible exists and that god exists therefor are bootstrapping and won't really work for people who don't already subscribe to that worldview. Compatibilism is also a potential option, old earth but Jesus is still god. Ultimately you say that the evolutionists can't go back in time to see things, but then neither can you. There are problems with the speed of light and how we can see stars so far away if there is a young universe. I also have problems with evolutionary points of view. Logical arguments are interesting, i.e. the cosmological argument and the argument from design but they support gods existence not necessarily a young earth. I would have thought you would have some really good ideas for why the earth is young, some of these were fleetingly mentioned i.e. that Jupiter is hot but i don't think that the point of view was really explained properly and its probably a straw man argument. I would prefer better details. I am a believer myself, but your arguments of oh well its written in genesis therefor we should just accept it.... If its really the truth is should stand up to scrutiny, there should be no fear in actually examining the details. Also if that part of the bible is myth, it still does not take away from the symbolism and the larger ideas of the bible and of course the central character of Jesus.
@poggon Young earth was disproved over a century ago by Lord Kelvin.
My suggestion would be to start with episode 1. (Natural Selection Part 1)
ICR is primarily concerned with observational science and has many videos and articles on the science of creation that you obviously have not watched or read because they give many obvious truths that support the Earth's and the universe's young age. This is more of a testimonial video. when you realize the theory of evolution is just another atheist-enforced anti-biblical replacement narrative for the creation, things will start to make sense. bottom line is, that science can not prove the age of the earth directly. there is no direct measurement. if you like logical arguments read the RATE literature (Radiometric dating and the Age of the Earth).
Light travel problem again! The horizon problem for secularists is as much a light travel problem for them. There hasn't been enough evolutionary time for heat to travel from one end of the universe to the other (it's too uniform) if the creation is as young as they say (What is it now 13.4 Billion years). Not enough time for that either! we creationists don't have all the answers but the observations we do have, better fit the biblical narrative. Do you think there was a worldwide flood? there are plenty of observations that support the biblical narrative for Noahs flood. We don't see landforms like the ones we see, forming today. something very different happened in the past. that's obvious! good luck with your studies.
@akmurf7429 ICR exist only to lie about science and try to promote Christianity.
@@akmurf7429 This channel is lying to you.
You say we are to take God's Word forbatum, what it says it means.
Yet so often, you do not.
@@brianjongeling8126 ^ verbatim.
Explain. For instance?
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours)
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
Have you added up the life spans of the men who were put in there by God? That is where 6,000 years comes from.
@@rm2h That is only half the story. YEC, Young Earth Christians, claim days 1 to 6 in Gen are only 24 hours.
YEC are WRONG on both counts.
1) The genealogies are adequate but not complete. No matter how you read the genealogies, you must concede that there are gaps. Also Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English. Thus genealogical terms like “son” and “father” have much broader meanings than their corresponding English words. Thus “son” (ben, 1121) means son, grandson, great grandson, and descendent. Similarly, “father” (ab, 1) means father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and ancestor.
2) Day in Gen is not 24 hours.
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours)
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” referring to the whole time of the six days,
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
LMAO!!!! Not understand science does NOT demonstrate the existence of any god!!!
Grow up, already!
Does an automobile or aircraft prove an engineer? Yes! Scientifically you cannot prove there is not a God because God exists outside our dimension and is the cause, of the effect (the creation). Looking at the effect of a 747 you would never say, "Wow! How did the parts come about and how did that thing assemble itself on its own"? Science is simply a methodology for investigating the existing creation. You can not scientifically prove the Big Bang or abiogenesis either but I'm sure you believe that. be honest already! The engineering in living things, the precise parameters of the universe, and the information in life, (DNA) all cannot create itself piecemeal. The existence of a designer is a far more rational point of view. the results of the James Webb telescope surprised secularists. They didn't surprise us creationists. Dr. Jason Lisle accurately predicted what they would find.
Real Noah’s ark has been rediscovered
YT Noah’s Ark data
Would you mind referencing anybody demonstrating the prebiotic chemistry required for a single protein or gene to form? Verifying our "mother" could actually be a perfectly sterile, barren, virgin, dumb as rock, warm little pond, primordial soup or whatever? Please, so I can be an intellectually satisfied atheist like you? I'm not convinced the 200 different types of the 37 trillion cells arranged in my body are evidence of a mindless process of trial and error.
A young universe??? no. Genesis 1 is about the creation of the surface of the earth. God's creative acts in Genesis 1 are when He speaks. He speaks light on Day 1. All else was created earlier. Dat 4, has an aside, "He made the stars also". This makes a possible understanding that He is claiming creatorship for the Universe, but He didn't speak it into existence on Day 4.
So, it is logical, acceptable and consistent with true science to have a young earth (around 6000 years ago), surface created in 6 days, and an old Universe, so old we can not fathom the past ages! I have no problem with Scriptural truth and observable, good scientific understanding with global catastrophism with the Genesis flood.
Real Noah’s ark has been rediscovered
YT Noah’s Ark data
God told Moses how he created everything
Real Noah’s ark has been rediscovered
YT Noah’s Ark data
@@Rom3_29 That has been proven to be rock and mud in the vague shape of a boat.
Genesis was disproved in the 1800s.
Well they have evidence that says otherwise. And not to mention the law of biogenesis life can only come from life. Which disproves the nonliving chemicals could give rise to life. Christian scientist disprove spontaneous generation. His name was Lewis Pastor I think.
the word of God cannot be disproved
@@HS-zk5nn It's not the word of God. It was written by over 20 different men.
@@speciesspeciate6429 God can direct men what to write
@@HS-zk5nn Then God is science illiterate.