What If Pokemon's Type Chart Was REVERSED?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
- Pokemon X and Y introduced inverse battles to the series, where every type interaction is flipped. Resistances and immunities become weaknesses, and weaknesses become resistances. Unfortunately they're only available in gen 6, so today let's explore what inverse battles would look like in more recent games.
Challenge command for Pokemon Showdown:
/challenge gen8ou@@@inversemod
Replace gen8ou with any other format you want to play
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @meplaysgames
Nidoran Tier - $2.99/month - Shoutout each video, exclusive emotes for comments/stream chat
Nidorino Tier - $4.99/month - Vote on upcoming videos, watch videos a day early + Nidoran Tier perks
Nidoking Tier - $9.99/month - Exclusive let's plays + all previous perks
Join our Discord server: / discord
MEPlaysGames on Twitter: / meplaysgamesyt
Instagram: / meplaysgames_yt
Check out my other channels:
My Prize Garage: / @myprizegarage
Musical Pile of Garbage: / @matt-no7gg
Miles Per Game: / @milespergame2526
Matt's Trash Can: / @mattstrashcan-yr6mj
![เขามัทรี - เอ็กซ์ ศุภกฤต - จอนนี่มิวสิค [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AS9ufKuQIVs/mqdefault.jpg)
We have Trick Room, Wonder Room and Magic Room, so why can’t we have an Inverse Room as well?
Mind if I steal that idea?
Hold up, you are onto something
While it may seem disappointing at first glance that Inverse Battles are exclusive to Gen 6, after looking at the type chart and realizing how unbalanced it is when inverted, it almost immediately becomes clear and understandable why it hasn't left Gen 6.
Wait so if a Pokemon with every type were to exist in this inverse scenario, would its only resistance be rock?
Yeah and it'd have like a billion weaknesses cuz of all the immunities it would have in a regular battle
I feel like Immunities should be just flipped instead of being turned into super effective.
Dragon now is immune to Fairy, etc.
Agreed
Maybe immune could be double effective? Like dragon could be 4x against Fairy? Better than flipping an offence into a defence I would be sure.
@@anthonybenci9035 Just Immune is fine.
@@rockowlgamer631 one interaction is one move. You do not need to take into account the defence from the perspective of the attacker.
Steel automatically becoming the worst type after locking everyone up for 8 generations is hilarious
Gamefreak could always bring it back as a room type move like wonder, trick,or magic.
very true
Or even an Ability that inverts type effectiveness upon entry, this can be a really cool gimmick Pokémon.
@jesuisunstroopwafel it would probably have to be a legendary.
Now imagine the inverted type chart with terastalization
Bug types would be eating good, my beloved Slither Wing would go so hard in Inverse Battles
We need Inverse Battles back
Levitate on rotom gan actually being good?1?1?1???!!1!1?!1!1!11
7:38 Elias: _"Matt, did you just try to use the big voice on me?"_
Matt: _"Uh... who are we talking about?"_
If you get the referece, you deserve a cookie.
"In a world where the Normal type is good..."
coming to a theater near you
Normal type is good tho
In the world of RBY
Ice type enjoyers eating good (I'm dying I need gen 9 inverse battles)
Imagine how bulky avalug would be with alolan ninetales snow AND aurora veil
Frosmoth special tank meta confirm⁉️
If the Pikachu had a lagging tail I could beat the Pikachu
9:47 isn't "firepower" moltres's thing?
While Steel is dominant in regular battles, they get an overkill beating in Inverse battles.
If fire/steel is the worst type combination in inverse battles, then does that mean that fire/steel is the best type in regular battles?
No, because 4x weaknesses are more detrimental than 4x resistances are beneficial
@@MEPlaysGames When is the detriment of a 4x weakness balanced by the benefit of 4x resistances? Every 4x weakness needs two 4x resistances to be a balanced type?
It is actually considered the best Type mathematically, with Fairy/Steel being close behind it. Just search Best Type Combination on TH-cam.
I think I’ve seen the video you’re talking about, and I don’t think a purely mathematical methodology is the best way to go about it. Like I said in my previous comment, double resistances aren’t as helpful as double weaknesses are debilitating, but they both count the same according to the methodology in the video. Plus as he points out, there are some factors he just doesn’t take into account, like how strong the Pokemon with each type are and what moves each type has access to. That kind of method is fine if you’re looking for the best type combination in a vacuum, but the answer is going to be different in practice.
Fire/steel might be the best in theory, but depending on how you crunch the numbers you could wind up with a different answer. Fairy/steel also tends to be better in practice, because Zacian for example is 2x weak to ground instead of 4x like Heatran. Fire/steel is also weak to fighting and water, which are both good offensive types. Meanwhile fairy/steel’s only other weakness is fire. The best type combination doesn’t have an objective answer. You can use numbers to get a rough idea of which type combinations are good, but that won’t tell you the whole story.
@@MEPlaysGames I don't know what video you are talking about. I created my own model independently.
I weigh offense and defense equally because I had no reason to pick a specific weight.
I don't know what best pokemon type would mean in practice. Pokemon has multiple aspects to it and typing is only one part of the game. So maybe there is no objective answer, but if there isn't an objective answer, then how could one claim that fairy/steel is better in practice?