@@alexlosy5 I'm aware. It's still awful, just like some of the throwback uniforms worn in professional sports. Just because it's old doesn't make it good!
@@AlexdeLarge6655321 Oh, thats what it is! Homage or not, it looks horrendous, but its a moot point, as i will never be in a position to spoil such a beautiful car with such a poor choice of paint🤣
Maybe I am a little biased the much more expensive 296 GTB is optioned with the Assetto Fiorano pack and it's being compared to a bone stock version of the Artura on a race track, doesn't feel like a fair comparison. Saying all that, it is insightful to hear how the Artura feels on a track. It does sound like McLaren has purposely held back the powertrain and gearbox so that the LT variant will a much bigger leap.
@@MissMiaFit Ferrari is a much bigger company... McLaren punching way above its weight, competiting with the best and often show the way forward. The supercar world has since pulled its socks up since McLaren hit the scene.
I am one of very few Artura owners around, it's taken a 1000 miles to get familiar with its behavior, it's fantastic on road and even better on the track. I have not found a moment that I felt I could use another 150hp, perhaps I need a longer track to go to..
Congrats! I was offered an allocation for one. I'm still undecided if I should jump the gun or not. While I love McLaren as in their design and ufo technology, numorous reviews from owners tend to be negative when it comes to the reliability. Hmmm Which car do you come from? What's your opinion on the Artura? i know the performance needs no question but what about other things when it comes to an ownership experience?
You get the blue nose pain as part of the Fiorano handling pack. In other words suspension so hard it's impossible to drive down a rough or should I say a typical UK road. Have a look at harrysgatage on TH-cam for a test of the csr
Thank you for this! The camera work, the editing, the music, all are top notch. Incisive yet charitable commentary gives us clear views of both cars. Excellent job all round. 🙂
Would be nice if you also had a MC20 on the track… The latest Ferrari’s have a design what I like, the 296 GTS, Roma and the Testa rossa J (also like the MC20)
Thanks for your comment misme2000. We have driven the MC20 on road and track Road: th-cam.com/video/12xxpy7M9NA/w-d-xo.html Track: th-cam.com/video/YWY5zWR5HrY/w-d-xo.html @ 10.35 Also, keep your eyes peeled for future upcoming content 😉
I absolutely disagree, Roma looks like an Aston Martin knock off, SF90 has a nice rear but a generic soulless front end, 296 gtb could also be the next Ford GT, Purosongue represents a walruss on wheels... On the other hand the McLaren isn't really Innovative in terms of Design, it just looks like the previous models...🤷♂️ I really like the 812, great looking car... especially the competizione version...
Great detailed review James, thank you. The Artura sounds like a very good car with a lot of the typical McLaren strengths, but also their slight weaknesses. The 296 is Ferrari at the top of their game, and still doing it with no steering feel and an old fashioned chassis construction. It sounds like if the 296 had decent steering feel, it would be perfection on wheels. Well done Ferrari.
I like the McLaren Artura more overall, the Ferrari’s power seems less usable in spirited city and canyon driving. Thanks for the comparison video, it was interesting, although they are not a proper comparison, I still wanted to see them compared.
People need to start quoting weight figures properly. Ferrari always quote their dry weight, which is1470kg so that's gna be nearly 1600kg on the road, the McLaren artura can be specced go be 1498kg on the road according to McLaren.
Whoever came up with the marketing "piccolo V12" deserves a raise. It does not sound like a V12, is not a V12, is not intricate or special. Its an alfa romeo engine out of a rental car sedan.
I think you'll find it's more about the different approaches to the tech from either company rather than an out n out financial comparison. Not to mention the Ferrari will be worth more on the open market.
Mclaren a far better all rounder and better value for the money. It's better looking and doesn't have the tacky american muscle car paint job which ruins the look of the Ferrari. However I do love the Ferrari as well, they are both masterfull peices of design and superb engineering.
Lack of lap timing seems excusable in this context given this comparison is much more concerned with the driving experience than it is with absolute performance. The track they've selected does a good job of emulating a winding backroad and there's clearly no question as to which machine brings more pace.
It makes me think of some rich idiot that isn't happy with the amount of attention you get when you own a Ferrari, they have to bastardize it with garish colors in an effort to get even more attention. Like when they wrap a car with gold vinyl but only slightly less disgusting looking.
The Artura is more of a 570 Sports series hybrid replacement than a 720S super series replacement. It's a different price and performance range. Whereas Ferrari are putting the 296GTB in a whole other category of V6. The 296GTB is clearly meant to replace the F8 with a V6. Let's see when Mclaren will bring out a V6 super series car to replace the 720S and then it will be a fairer comparison.
I think I would go with the Ferrari, of course I would have it repainted before delivery. Maybe I am old-fashioned but that blue is terrible. But my reason for the Ferrari is not that it is faster, I have no realistic ability to use the small difference between the two. But the regenerative braking gives me the ability to support my environmental views but sometimes when the mood strikes go like a bat out of hell with a huge engine howling behind me. Soon as McLaren adds regenerative braking that will be my choice. The jet plane controls on the Ferrari are not big on my list and I think that the tires on the McLaren are better matched to its output than the Ferrari (but not totally sure of that)
Just to be clear this not a contest, the Ferrari 296 is at a different league than the Artura. Let alone McLaren has a well deserved bad reputation that something always goes wrong with them and it will cost you a lot.
Considering the price difference I think Mclaren would be very flattered that the Artura would be compared to the 296. What Mclaren have made for a relatively low sum is remarkable.
To me, both of these sound (a bit) and look (a lot) better than their turbo V8 predecessors, criminal paintjob on the Ferrari aside. All that power must be pretty frustrating on the road though
This comparison feels more like the 488 vs the 570s. If McLaren is building a hybrid replacement for the 720s, I would expect it'll be closer to the SF90.
I would rather the driving position in the McLaren as not a lot on the steering wheel. Obviously the Ferrari's faster but how many are going to race it. Plus the McLaren spider's has had a power increase now and does look quite Nice. Better than the Ferrari convertible. I would choose the McLaren Artura Spider. But living in England i would perhaps go for the Ferrari 296 GTB but needs the right colour and spec. If i was worrying a bit about the money i would buy the McLaren.
I wanted to hate the McLaren but it looks much,much better than I expected. Especially in brighter/lary colours. I love the nose, butresses/rear window, dihedral doors, interior, simple controls (lack of haptics), hydraulic steering, more than adequate performance and slightly more accessible price tag. Ferrari is prettier (w/o the Fiorano strped nonsense), sounds better, is faster (but would that matter in the real world?) but it's £100K more expensive. It would be easier to re-enact the Persuaders, has more 'heritage' etc. Heart says Ferrari. Head says McLaren. If you could afford either it would be a nice problem to have! 🤘🏻
Ferrari 296 GTB is my clear favorite. It has the better interior, the better engines and also more prestige than the british opponent. However, I love the exterior design of the Mclaren, that's where the Ferrari disappoints me a bit. Pricewise the Mclaren is much more attractive than the Ferrari, especially in my country Austria where there is no tax despite VAT on the McLaren, but 28% on the Ferrari. So here in Austria I would go for the McLaren despite preferring the Ferrari (we actually have an SF90 Spider being delivered this month).
@@CITRUS-- I used to work with Ferrari cars...and Lamborghinis, Porsche, Range Rover and Bentley...we bought/sold many many models for hi-end rentals across Europe. The Porsche and the Bentley were the most reliable, Ferrari close second, NEVER had any problems, over different models. The least reliable to dam' right AWFUL were the Range Rover and the Lambos!
i very balanced review showing benefits of both. BUT the Ferrari is the masterpiece. Good on you Mc:Laren for making such an outstanding car. Grazie Mille Ferrari for delivering what the Tifosi need to continue the tradition!
The Artura is like a test for McLaren to see if can compete with Ferrari and others in this segment of hybrid!! Cause seriously V6 hybrid? Why not 765lt hybrid? Or one with P1 power unit making 907 HP now that's Challenge!!
I believe that at this price range, brand loyalty likely wins over price advantage. It does for anyways! Give me the Ferrari, but minus the Assetto Fiorano package. I don't have the driving skill to really take advantage of the higher capability and I can also avoid that livery. I have yet to see a color combination that I like.
They mention a price difference but don't say... The Ferrari is 65k more expensive. Of course it's going to be quicker. I'm looking forward to whatever LT version McLaren come out with, that can compete with the Ferrari.
Not surprised the Ferrari is more capable as it is US$100k more expensive. Artura matches up against 911 turbo/GT (and dominates), 720 goes against 296.
Unfair comparison. The Arturo is the new Sports Series car; essentially a 570S replacement. Wait for the 720S replacement and then have a fair match up. Super Series V Super Series.
296 GTB is currently the entry level model in Ferrari's sports car lineup, below the 812 and SF90. Ferrari stopped taking order for the F8 months ago and production is stopping soon.
The Mclaren Artura is £50k cheaper than the Ferrari 296. Mclaren 720s is almost same price. So should have used that model instead. Not a fair comparison financially at least using A
Good luck being able to walk into a Ferrari dealership and just buying a GTB though. About as easy as buying a new Porsche GT3 unless you’ve bought half a dozen cars from them before. At least Mac will sell you one if you just walk in off the street.
Not even a comparison. Asseto Fiorano vs a bone stock artura. The only reason why they being compared to eacah other is because both manufacturers released a v6 hybrid around the same time. The Ferrari costs more so it must perform better. The McLaren on the other haand is performing at its price point. To put them side by side is not fair to both of sides.
Two cars that will never be driven this way by anyone who actually buys it. Rather both will be garage queens lucky to see more than 2k miles in their lifetime.
Chi is right. I already have a McLaren (and Artura will probably be the next one) and I don't let it in the garage, nor my other cars. I ride them as often as I can, on road and/or on track. 😉
That 296gtb has to be best looking Ferrari since the 599. I love how it harks back to the 250 LM. Its amazing to think that Mclaren have only been making road cars for 10 years.
These cars are not competitors, the price and power contrast between the two are far too different for them to be competitors. The GTB is more a 720s competitor and the Artura is more a Huracan competitor.
@@sssssss8946 Use your head… you’re comparing an entry level McLaren with 671 horses to a Ferrari that costs more than a 720s and has 819 horses. They simply don’t compare. And yes the 5 year old ICE McLaren 720s is more of a competitor. Just like how the hybrid SF90’s biggest competitor is the ICE 765LT. And you know I’m not talking about an 8 year old Huracan🤦🏽♂️… I’m talking about the EVO and the Technica. When McLaren makes the Artura LT it will be a proper 296 competitor.
I hate the toy car paint job on that Ferrari. I don't dislike the pattern, it's the color. It makes it hard to properly take in the lines of the design.
The title of the video says "Track Battle", it is not. It's a nice track review, indeed... but no lap times. IMHO it's not a fair comparison, since the price difference of both cars is almost $100K.
@@ENGBriseB man I rate Mclaren above my all times favourites racing technical wizard Porsche ! I'm disappointed to see a Mclaren over shadowed by my most hated manufacturer Ferrari 😳
720S successor will be the real competitor of the 296! I agree with other comment saying that the V6s sound better than the previous V8s. The 296 looks really beautiful (not in this two tone paint 😅)! It absolutely kills the slightly weird looking F8...
In real life their DIN weight is over a 400 lb difference. Primarily from a carbon tub but McLaren has always been about lightness. Ferrari is not so concerned about it as they get away with lying easily.
Good, fair review. Both cars have good points but both are still too fat and fast. Just what is the point of either ? I would buy an Alpine and put the money in the bank!
O yes an alpine sounds great. If you drive the 296 it’s actually nuts , def the most technologically advanced car I’ve ever driven . It will def be worth the 350k price tag…
Not much of a battle here - I can walk into a McLaren dealership and order an Artura, but I can't order a 296 GTB (I tried, they're sold out, completely). And if you want to talk about pre-owned, then the prices will undoubtedly be higher than MSRP, in which case I'm looking at the next tier of supercar, where the 296 just isn't as appealing (think: 720S, F8 Tributo, etc.) Well done Ferrari, such a shame I can't own one.
Neither sounds that great. If you think you can't make a V6 sound great, check out some of the Jaguar F-Type V6 sound tracks here on TH-cam. I may be biased tho ;-)
@@CP-vg4vy even in person still not as good as a much cheaper Jag V6. Just compare the sounds here on TH-cam. My point is, a V6 can be made to sound fantastic, they should able to do it for a few hundred thousand dollar car. th-cam.com/video/0u5CvD8a3fI/w-d-xo.html
296 GTB has a better V6 tone than an F Type V6: th-cam.com/users/shortsC7tKDDhLFao?feature=share sounds a bit like a baby V12. Just needs a good exhaust.
@@jortepap So after spending $350,000 on the 296 then you have to spend another what, $20-30,000 on an aftermarket exhaust> And IMO the example you gave sounds better than stock but not better than the Jag. 2 different sounds.
buonasera. confronto impari perchè la nuova ferrari 296 è la regina della categoria ridefinendo performance e stile. grandissimo investimento. la artura è davvero poco aggraziata nelle linee e meno performante. ovviamente costa anche un po' meno.
![MV วิถีชีวิตใต้ - ผา อัยย๊ะ [Official MV HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nODlkOUu9B0/mqdefault.jpg)
Which is your favourite - McLaren or Ferrari?
Let us know in the comments below...
Ferrari for sure!
Ferrari easy!
Porsche ! 😄
The Artura's Carbon Ceramic brake fade is surprising🤔
🐴
That color combo on the Ferrari is absolutely ghastly
As is the rear.
Totally. Looks 10x better in just one colour.
Predictable comments are predictable.
It’s a heritage combo.
@@alexlosy5 I'm aware. It's still awful, just like some of the throwback uniforms worn in professional sports. Just because it's old doesn't make it good!
Who on earth specced the paint on that Ferrari and, mores to the point, why have Ferrari given that as an option?!
Harry Metcalfe gives the replies you are looking for.
First check your bank account...
It's in homage to the 250lm.
@@AlexdeLarge6655321 Oh, thats what it is!
Homage or not, it looks horrendous, but its a moot point, as i will never be in a position to spoil such a beautiful car with such a poor choice of paint🤣
@@Andrew-vx2ls I can well imagine the astronomical costs involved, to ruin such a fine car!
@@kristofevo If recall correctly, it’s something like £25k. And it looks shit.
Maybe I am a little biased the much more expensive 296 GTB is optioned with the Assetto Fiorano pack and it's being compared to a bone stock version of the Artura on a race track, doesn't feel like a fair comparison. Saying all that, it is insightful to hear how the Artura feels on a track. It does sound like McLaren has purposely held back the powertrain and gearbox so that the LT variant will a much bigger leap.
But Ferrari will build a "sport" version of the 296
@@wildlifezillertal indeed and McLaren will come out with an LT.
@@larssonk22 and the McLaren will break down ten times more often than the Ferrari, LT or not.
@@MissMiaFit not sure what that has to do with the current discussion but thank you for your input.
@@MissMiaFit Ferrari is a much bigger company... McLaren punching way above its weight, competiting with the best and often show the way forward. The supercar world has since pulled its socks up since McLaren hit the scene.
A $100k price difference maked the GTB a 720s competator, you basically have a Golf and a Fiesta out there because they both have 4 doors.
Only item can say get used to such. When new 720S model is released, SF90 will be used because both have similar drive trains.
don't forget this 296 GTB is optioned with the Assetto Fiorano pack so it's slightly lighter and has better dampners.
Yeah that’s what I was thinking- this is like taking a Roma vs a 720S and wondering which car is gonna be better
@@larssonk22 you seem upset lol
@@austensmith3330 little biased yes 😉
I am one of very few Artura owners around, it's taken a 1000 miles to get familiar with its behavior, it's fantastic on road and even better on the track. I have not found a moment that I felt I could use another 150hp, perhaps I need a longer track to go to..
Congrats! I was offered an allocation for one. I'm still undecided if I should jump the gun or not. While I love McLaren as in their design and ufo technology, numorous reviews from owners tend to be negative when it comes to the reliability. Hmmm Which car do you come from? What's your opinion on the Artura? i know the performance needs no question but what about other things when it comes to an ownership experience?
@@christmasisawesome9348 need a better Mclaren
@@austensmith3330 What did you mean by that?
Ferrari gets my vote as its the more attractive of the two in my personal opinion although Id prefer just red paint and not the blue nose etc.
You get the blue nose pain as part of the Fiorano handling pack. In other words suspension so hard it's impossible to drive down a rough or should I say a typical UK road. Have a look at harrysgatage on TH-cam for a test of the csr
It’s not that bad, we’ve had the AF pack on UK roads and it’s fine. Adaptive dampers definitely more forgiving, however.
Yeap. Just red, simple color. Regular 5 spoke rims.
Classic 👍
@@teifion-m9r and also if like the SF90 it doesn't have the lift system then that package is a real waste.
Thank you for this! The camera work, the editing, the music, all are top notch. Incisive yet charitable commentary gives us clear views of both cars. Excellent job all round. 🙂
The Ferrari looks lovely, but that blue paint work on the bonnet looks like a 'stop oil' protester splashed some paint on the car!
I’m pretty sure people said the same thing when the first car with orange rims showed up.
Would be nice if you also had a MC20 on the track…
The latest Ferrari’s have a design what I like, the 296 GTS, Roma and the Testa rossa J (also like the MC20)
Thanks for your comment misme2000. We have driven the MC20 on road and track
Road: th-cam.com/video/12xxpy7M9NA/w-d-xo.html
Track: th-cam.com/video/YWY5zWR5HrY/w-d-xo.html @ 10.35
Also, keep your eyes peeled for future upcoming content 😉
I absolutely disagree, Roma looks like an Aston Martin knock off, SF90 has a nice rear but a generic soulless front end, 296 gtb could also be the next Ford GT, Purosongue represents a walruss on wheels...
On the other hand the McLaren isn't really Innovative in terms of Design, it just looks like the previous models...🤷♂️
I really like the 812, great looking car... especially the competizione version...
@@-Ehrenbruder-Sam- I don’t think the Roma looks like a Ford Mondeo, like an Aston Martin does…
@@misme2000 in case you forgot look at a picture of the DB10 form Spectre
Great detailed review James, thank you. The Artura sounds like a very good car with a lot of the typical McLaren strengths, but also their slight weaknesses. The 296 is Ferrari at the top of their game, and still doing it with no steering feel and an old fashioned chassis construction. It sounds like if the 296 had decent steering feel, it would be perfection on wheels. Well done Ferrari.
Thanks!
So the Ferrari hits 120mph in about the same amount of time a 308 used to take to get to 60mph. Amazing.
Ferrari 296 GTB Is The Best
I saw this particular ferarri a little while ago in the flesh,absolutely stunning! It didnt have this awful ferano colour scheme though
Got to say the Artura looks better in a subdued paint than it does in the usual McLaren look at me paint schemes.
296 looks like a handful. I would be happy with that.
The Artura looks way better than the 296GTB
Yes, the Artura does look way better than the Ferrari, I agree.
I like the McLaren Artura more overall, the Ferrari’s power seems less usable in spirited city and canyon driving. Thanks for the comparison video, it was interesting, although they are not a proper comparison, I still wanted to see them compared.
McLaren. The Ferrari hurts my eyes.
People need to start quoting weight figures properly. Ferrari always quote their dry weight, which is1470kg so that's gna be nearly 1600kg on the road, the McLaren artura can be specced go be 1498kg on the road according to McLaren.
Whoever came up with the marketing "piccolo V12" deserves a raise. It does not sound like a V12, is not a V12, is not intricate or special. Its an alfa romeo engine out of a rental car sedan.
Many people have said it does sound like a mini V12 and it's not an alfa romeo engine!
It is rather annoying that the car magazines are comparing these as directed competitors when they're miles apart in cost and performance
Macca £185k, Fezza £242k. £57k difference. That's not a like by like comparison.
I think you'll find it's more about the different approaches to the tech from either company rather than an out n out financial comparison. Not to mention the Ferrari will be worth more on the open market.
@@pauln0371 yeah £57,000 extra would do that.
@@sajid6027 it'll be way more than the £57k difference in RRP.
Don't cry
@@mariobotti1952 why on earth would I do that? Grow TF up!
What's the difference in price?
Mclaren a far better all rounder and better value for the money. It's better looking and doesn't have the tacky american muscle car paint job which ruins the look of the Ferrari. However I do love the Ferrari as well, they are both masterfull peices of design and superb engineering.
Even with no lap times (what a shame), that is the best track review from Car Magazine in a long time!
Thank you! Hopefully some lap times next time.
@@CARmagazineTV Any GT3 racer on slicks will destroy any road legal car so other than for fun, lap times are not really significant.
The Ferrari looks like it was modified by one of the 2fast and 2furious crew .
Outstandingly well articulated and nuanced explanation of the differences between the two. Thank you!
Glad you enjoyed 👌👌
I'm sorry but doing a 'track battle' video but not doing lap times feels like going to KFC and them telling you "we've run out of chicken".
Lack of lap timing seems excusable in this context given this comparison is much more concerned with the driving experience than it is with absolute performance. The track they've selected does a good job of emulating a winding backroad and there's clearly no question as to which machine brings more pace.
Probably not quick lap times on account of not being smooth enough so losing traction on every corner.
@@RearWheelZeal But they said they didn't have a stopwatch lol! They had their phones that had a stopwatch.
LOL Gotdamn, they couldn't pick a better color for the Ferrari?
It makes me think of some rich idiot that isn't happy with the amount of attention you get when you own a Ferrari, they have to bastardize it with garish colors in an effort to get even more attention. Like when they wrap a car with gold vinyl but only slightly less disgusting looking.
What a competent, clear and entertaining video!
The Artura is more of a 570 Sports series hybrid replacement than a 720S super series replacement. It's a different price and performance range. Whereas Ferrari are putting the 296GTB in a whole other category of V6. The 296GTB is clearly meant to replace the F8 with a V6. Let's see when Mclaren will bring out a V6 super series car to replace the 720S and then it will be a fairer comparison.
I think I would go with the Ferrari, of course I would have it repainted before delivery. Maybe I am old-fashioned but that blue is terrible. But my reason for the Ferrari is not that it is faster, I have no realistic ability to use the small difference between the two. But the regenerative braking gives me the ability to support my environmental views but sometimes when the mood strikes go like a bat out of hell with a huge engine howling behind me. Soon as McLaren adds regenerative braking that will be my choice. The jet plane controls on the Ferrari are not big on my list and I think that the tires on the McLaren are better matched to its output than the Ferrari (but not totally sure of that)
You could have done a timed lap. Sounds like someone did not want you to play.
Both manufacturers were happy with us doing a timed lap, no issues there.
@@CARmagazineTV why not then?
Regardless of the history of Ferrari, but the one who chose the style and color for this Ferrari is color blind
Just to be clear this not a contest, the Ferrari 296 is at a different league than the Artura. Let alone McLaren has a well deserved bad reputation that something always goes wrong with them and it will cost you a lot.
Just this minute reading the same article in Car magazine
Considering the price difference I think Mclaren would be very flattered that the Artura would be compared to the 296.
What Mclaren have made for a relatively low sum is remarkable.
To me, both of these sound (a bit) and look (a lot) better than their turbo V8 predecessors, criminal paintjob on the Ferrari aside. All that power must be pretty frustrating on the road though
"818 in a road car" ... Car magazine clearly is still ignoring EV performance. Somewhat ignorant.
Isn't there a 150,000 pound difference in price ?
No. 57k.
This comparison feels more like the 488 vs the 570s. If McLaren is building a hybrid replacement for the 720s, I would expect it'll be closer to the SF90.
I would rather the driving position in the McLaren as not a lot on the steering wheel. Obviously the Ferrari's faster but how many are going to race it. Plus the McLaren spider's has had a power increase now and does look quite Nice. Better than the Ferrari convertible. I would choose the McLaren Artura Spider. But living in England i would perhaps go for the Ferrari 296 GTB but needs the right colour and spec. If i was worrying a bit about the money i would buy the McLaren.
I wanted to hate the McLaren but it looks much,much better than I expected. Especially in brighter/lary colours. I love the nose, butresses/rear window, dihedral doors, interior, simple controls (lack of haptics), hydraulic steering, more than adequate performance and slightly more accessible price tag.
Ferrari is prettier (w/o the Fiorano strped nonsense), sounds better, is faster (but would that matter in the real world?) but it's £100K more expensive. It would be easier to re-enact the Persuaders, has more 'heritage' etc.
Heart says Ferrari. Head says McLaren. If you could afford either it would be a nice problem to have! 🤘🏻
11:20 - In the background - very briefly was that the 30% more expensive Ferrari recovering back to track perchance?
Ferrari 296 GTB is my clear favorite. It has the better interior, the better engines and also more prestige than the british opponent. However, I love the exterior design of the Mclaren, that's where the Ferrari disappoints me a bit. Pricewise the Mclaren is much more attractive than the Ferrari, especially in my country Austria where there is no tax despite VAT on the McLaren, but 28% on the Ferrari. So here in Austria I would go for the McLaren despite preferring the Ferrari (we actually have an SF90 Spider being delivered this month).
Where's NSX type S? Same formula, v6 and 3 electric motors.. O.G super hybrid under $ 500k.
Absolutely superb video. Car obviously throwing some talent at these. 👏👏👏
Thank you!
Considering the Macca is stock and the Fez has 100k extra options to make it not much quicker....ill take the Macca please.
More importantly, the indifferent build quality and the dreadful reliability of McLarens are such that there's really only one option...the Ferrari...
Most people that go on about McLaren's reliability have never owned one. Look it up.
Actually getting hold of a ferrari is a bitch due to having to have already owned older ones first
Yet another moronic comment by somebody that obviously has no clue.
@@CITRUS--
I used to work with Ferrari cars...and Lamborghinis, Porsche, Range Rover and Bentley...we bought/sold many many models for hi-end rentals across Europe.
The Porsche and the Bentley were the most reliable, Ferrari close second, NEVER had any problems, over different models. The least reliable to dam' right AWFUL were the Range Rover and the Lambos!
Not having regen and yet still having worse braking feel and strenght is an own goal for mclaren
i very balanced review showing benefits of both. BUT the Ferrari is the masterpiece. Good on you Mc:Laren for making such an outstanding car. Grazie Mille Ferrari for delivering what the Tifosi need to continue the tradition!
Ferrari seems to be a great car, but it sounds soo muted for a car like this.
sounds great tbf. Even tough comparing sounds through a video is a bit meaningful
If I had to opt for a "affordable" Ferrari it whould be a used 458 speciale...
@@-Ehrenbruder-Sam- you did the right thing using “” ahahah 🤣
@Ehrenbruder Sam speciale cost more than the 296
Really you guys do an intense track day comparison and you don’t set up times for lap times😂 how much more did McLaren pay not to post it?
Nothing but Ferrari paid a lot of money.
I’d rather have an Emira.
The Artura is like a test for McLaren to see if can compete with Ferrari and others in this segment of hybrid!! Cause seriously V6 hybrid? Why not 765lt hybrid? Or one with P1 power unit making 907 HP now that's Challenge!!
I believe that at this price range, brand loyalty likely wins over price advantage. It does for anyways! Give me the Ferrari, but minus the Assetto Fiorano package. I don't have the driving skill to really take advantage of the higher capability and I can also avoid that livery. I have yet to see a color combination that I like.
They mention a price difference but don't say... The Ferrari is 65k more expensive. Of course it's going to be quicker. I'm looking forward to whatever LT version McLaren come out with, that can compete with the Ferrari.
base price it's more like $100k where'd u get 65 from?
@@papa_pt Sorry mate, I was referring to UK prices so 65K in GBP.
Not surprised the Ferrari is more capable as it is US$100k more expensive. Artura matches up against 911 turbo/GT (and dominates), 720 goes against 296.
When an engine lacks tq and midrange it needs electric motors and anti lag . Why displacement is nice. Nice cars though !!
Unfair comparison. The Arturo is the new Sports Series car; essentially a 570S replacement. Wait for the 720S replacement and then have a fair match up. Super Series V Super Series.
That maybe true but most will try to claim 720S replacement is on par with SF90. CM has to put out content.
296 GTB is currently the entry level model in Ferrari's sports car lineup, below the 812 and SF90. Ferrari stopped taking order for the F8 months ago and production is stopping soon.
brake reGen’s natural mechanical advantage when slowing down
The Mclaren Artura is £50k cheaper than the Ferrari 296. Mclaren 720s is almost same price. So should have used that model instead. Not a fair comparison financially at least using A
The Ferrari costs double…
Neither one still looks and sounds as good as Lamborghini Huracan with NA V10
Murcielago LP670 SV...🤌
Good luck being able to walk into a Ferrari dealership and just buying a GTB though. About as easy as buying a new Porsche GT3 unless you’ve bought half a dozen cars from them before. At least Mac will sell you one if you just walk in off the street.
That ferrari colour scheme should be ILLEGAL. How's it called, Rosso Elfonso ? Or Asseto Elfiorano ?
Probably McLaren will bring a LT version of Artura for a rematch
Not even a comparison. Asseto Fiorano vs a bone stock artura. The only reason why they being compared to eacah other is because both manufacturers released a v6 hybrid around the same time. The Ferrari costs more so it must perform better. The McLaren on the other haand is performing at its price point. To put them side by side is not fair to both of sides.
Sad that the McLaren beats the Ferrari looks wise.
Artura is not a race track oriented vehicle, the McLaren 750s is.
Love the GTB.....a big win for Fezzalari. As for that helmet mic......a big fail. Time for an upgrade.
Two cars that will never be driven this way by anyone who actually buys it. Rather both will be garage queens lucky to see more than 2k miles in their lifetime.
False. People that buy these cars take them to the track. Ask me why I know this...
Chi is right. I already have a McLaren (and Artura will probably be the next one) and I don't let it in the garage, nor my other cars. I ride them as often as I can, on road and/or on track. 😉
@@crespolav1279 getting my Artura in a few days. It's still making it's way across the pond
A whole track test video at Cadwell park and not a single clip of either car jumping the mountain? How?!
Not enough speed to get them to take off sadly 😢
Times?
That 296gtb has to be best looking Ferrari since the 599. I love how it harks back to the 250 LM. Its amazing to think that Mclaren have only been making road cars for 10 years.
These cars are not competitors, the price and power contrast between the two are far too different for them to be competitors. The GTB is more a 720s competitor and the Artura is more a Huracan competitor.
So the newest Ferrari hybrid is a competitor to 5 yrs old ICE McLaren? Huracan is even older,like 8 years
@@sssssss8946 Use your head… you’re comparing an entry level McLaren with 671 horses to a Ferrari that costs more than a 720s and has 819 horses. They simply don’t compare. And yes the 5 year old ICE McLaren 720s is more of a competitor. Just like how the hybrid SF90’s biggest competitor is the ICE 765LT. And you know I’m not talking about an 8 year old Huracan🤦🏽♂️… I’m talking about the EVO and the Technica. When McLaren makes the Artura LT it will be a proper 296 competitor.
I hate the toy car paint job on that Ferrari. I don't dislike the pattern, it's the color. It makes it hard to properly take in the lines of the design.
The title of the video says "Track Battle", it is not. It's a nice track review, indeed... but no lap times. IMHO it's not a fair comparison, since the price difference of both cars is almost $100K.
Disappointed to see Mclaren 150 bhp down, since it is an entry level vs top spec perhaps 🤔
Also the price. Never underestimate a MacLaren.
@@ENGBriseB man I rate Mclaren above my all times favourites racing technical wizard Porsche ! I'm disappointed to see a Mclaren over shadowed by my most hated manufacturer Ferrari 😳
720S successor will be the real competitor of the 296!
I agree with other comment saying that the V6s sound better than the previous V8s.
The 296 looks really beautiful (not in this two tone paint 😅)! It absolutely kills the slightly weird looking F8...
Excellent presentation.
In real life their DIN weight is over a 400 lb difference. Primarily from a carbon tub but McLaren has always been about lightness. Ferrari is not so concerned about it as they get away with lying easily.
The Artura is just cleaner and a daily supercar
Good, fair review.
Both cars have good points but both are still too fat and fast. Just what is the point of either ?
I would buy an Alpine and put the money in the bank!
O yes an alpine sounds great. If you drive the 296 it’s actually nuts , def the most technologically advanced car I’ve ever driven . It will def be worth the 350k price tag…
Second gen MR2 whould be my pick...
Two amazing cars but I would pick the Ferrari no doubt
What an excellent presentation!. I so wish if i could have been his passenger
We wish we could have had passengers!
The 296 would have been perfectly fine in plain red or plain cyan. Who in the world came up with that color combo?
I'll wait for the artura, in about 2 to 3 years itll be 50% off
I seriosly doubt that. Countries with emission based car tax it will be very popular.
Not much of a battle here - I can walk into a McLaren dealership and order an Artura, but I can't order a 296 GTB (I tried, they're sold out, completely). And if you want to talk about pre-owned, then the prices will undoubtedly be higher than MSRP, in which case I'm looking at the next tier of supercar, where the 296 just isn't as appealing (think: 720S, F8 Tributo, etc.) Well done Ferrari, such a shame I can't own one.
Get the McLaren then. Life's too short
“To cite Enzo Ferrari, we will always sell one less Ferrari than the market wants, that’s a policy that will never change.”
- Sergio Marchionne
Neither sounds that great. If you think you can't make a V6 sound great, check out some of the Jaguar F-Type V6 sound tracks here on TH-cam. I may be biased tho ;-)
I’d say they sound better in person.
@@CP-vg4vy even in person still not as good as a much cheaper Jag V6. Just compare the sounds here on TH-cam. My point is, a V6 can be made to sound fantastic, they should able to do it for a few hundred thousand dollar car. th-cam.com/video/0u5CvD8a3fI/w-d-xo.html
296 GTB has a better V6 tone than an F Type V6: th-cam.com/users/shortsC7tKDDhLFao?feature=share sounds a bit like a baby V12. Just needs a good exhaust.
@@jortepap So after spending $350,000 on the 296 then you have to spend another what, $20-30,000 on an aftermarket exhaust> And IMO the example you gave sounds better than stock but not better than the Jag. 2 different sounds.
Just get yourself a used Ferrari 458...🤷♂️
buonasera. confronto impari perchè la nuova ferrari 296 è la regina della categoria ridefinendo performance e stile. grandissimo investimento. la artura è davvero poco aggraziata nelle linee e meno performante. ovviamente costa anche un po' meno.
Utterly ridiculous comparison considering the 286 GTB costs almost twice as much.
I would've thought that the McLaren to be more expensive.
That is hands down the most f***** color combination ever thought of!!
n/a v12 is still the best
I want offroad version of 296gts 🥶🥶
If you think the colors on that Ferrari look good, you're wrong.
All we wanted was a drag race
The Ferrari is another level!!