You also said all life came from an amoeba with 0 evidence whatsoever. Either way, you can't have fossilzed tracks millions of years before the actual fossilized animals. Millions of years never happened. "We conclude that these data are most easily explained by the global flood model." Stratigraphic Distribution of Vertebrate Fossil Footprints Compared with Body Fossils-by Leonard R. Brand, James Florence
That's funny though. Speaking of funny, here's a joke: Kent walks into a debate and says something truthful without also implying something false or manipulative or following it up with something stupid and false. Convinced by the evidence that something good can come from bad people Kent becomes an atheist and apologizes for his decades of childish behaviour.
@@stylis666 666 lol. You're a joke buddy. Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Next time Kent says " even a 5 year old will say x is related to y" you should ask him how likely he thinks it will be for a 5 year old to correctly guess the animals that are related to a platypus.
I Google fossilized mosquito. It said 80 million years old. Funny how after "80 million years" a mosquito is still a mosquito LOL. Oops. (As if millions of years were a real thing)
6:35 is when I checked out. Kent is rehashing literally the exact same points he has been corrected on in every single debate. AronRa and GutsickGibbon both broke it down in such a way that he had to deliberately choose to ignore what they were saying, and I can already tell it's going to happen again. Perhaps it's time to simply let Kent fade into obscurity and stop giving him the attention he craves. He got plenty of that from the courts already.
The debate channels love Kent, love or hate him, he brings in the views. I've watched him that many times, I could probably say his stupid script word for word. Every time he annoys me, but he is like a car wreck. you'll always look!
@@ashwayn Yes, he was and found guilty in court for assaulting his ex wife. There's an audio of him being abusive. There's a whole documentary on him, he's a proven narcissist. 🤷🏼♂️ Something to do with tax evasion too, but I don't understand American tax laws, so I don't get that part.
As they say everyone has an opinion like they have an a hole. Well thought out comment dumbazz. Typicall thinking of childlike mind. Keep up the good work.
Nobody youtuber or 3x phd organic chemist? Oops. According to our experimental experience only an intelligent source is capable of meeting these requirements, instructions, codes, languages, and code conventions. The fact that only one single genetic language exists indicates that one single intelligent source must have been responsible for the single genetic code of all polyphylogenetic biology. There is no other solution." -A.E. Wilder-Smith 3x phd organic chemist
@@JimmyTony-uu2xsAnd this Wilder-Smith's word is as valuable as toilet paper. He needs to bring evidence to show that it's designed. Pointing out complexity and just deciding _"Hmmm, this must be designed by someone!"_ is *not. enough.*
It doesn't matter if h is math doesn't add up. Kent doesn't have any money. Everything in his possession belongs to God. He stated that under oath in a court of law.
he has no formal education but he does have a list of criminal offenses. Borat did make fun of him once for a floater in the toilet which was hilarious.
Despite having no scientific credentials or even an accredited degree, Hovind presents himself as someone who understands the science of evolution better than people with advanced science degrees who research in labs and publish peer-reviewed papers. During his presentations, he sounds like a stand-up comedian when he attacks evolution, or a used car salesman when he is attempting to make a point by getting his audience to buy a video or book from him. Many of his slideshows read like a top 10 list of commonly seen (and refuted) arguments for creationism that contain little to no actual data or proof. These arguments are interjected with painfully unfunny "jokes" and anecdotes, which are topped off with a healthy serving of mined quotes.
So why is Hovind conflating biological evolution with abiogenesis, cosmic evolution , geological evolution et al which have nothing to do with biological evolution ? He’s either ignorant or dishonest . He’s been schooled on this so many times which means that he’s being wilfully dishonest.
Evolution (man evolving from apes) is pure fantasy. Give me just one observable evidence for evolution that doesn’t require faith? Every living thing produces after their kind, humans produce humans and dogs produce dogs, etc. There are different variations within a kind (which is biblical) but living things remain within their own. The theory of evolution and the big bang is anti-science because it's not observable or testable. There are so many problems with those theories. Like, where did all the complex elements that supposedly made us come from? Evolutionary scholars believe that the creation of life involved waters but here's the big problem with that. Sunlight and water destroy DNA, the very thing that destroys DNA somehow assembled it? So how did the DNA code originate? What came first-DNA or the repair enzymes that are necessary to maintain DNA? You need both at the same time, the information for the repair enzymes is encoded into the DNA itself. This all has to be true simultaneously or living things don’t exist. Just so many problems these theories can't answer because it's nothing more than political propaganda and yet we wonder why our society is the way it is. Who determines what good and evil are? 👉Society does not determine morality.👈 I'm only saying these things because your life matter to God, he created you with a purpose. He has been misrepresented by people who don't know him, Christianity is not church attendance and religion is dead but having a personal relationship with God is everything.
@@purefoldnz3070 Taxpayers pay to brainwash little kids into believing there is no God, only made possible by peddling the "milliins of years" fraud. Can't have fossilized tracks millions of years before the animal showed up. "We conclude that these data are most easily explained by the global flood model." Stratigraphic Distribution of Vertebrate Fossil Footprints Compared with Body Fossils-by Leonard R. Brand, James Florence
@@jacobsr51 um.. well you better tell Kent that because thats all he does. If he cant take then he shouldnt dish it out. Even more so for convicted felons.
@@nzifb7409 Except Kent doesn't have a 1. He starts with an off topic straw man about the origins of life. Has been explained for about 30 years by dozens of people that the origins of life are irrelevant to evolution. And then he deliberately misunderstands what evolution teaches by saying it teaches we came from a rock, which again is about the origins of life and have nothing to do with evolution. And then he wants an example of something that would disprove evolution: an animal producing offspring of a different species. He has been explained that evolution predicts that the next generation of any organism will be the same species for thousands of times over about 30 years as well. Kent has 0 correct information and 0+0 will always be 0. All he does is deliberately misunderstand like a child. He has done this since his first debate and he hasn't changed his tactic. That isn't because anything he says is true but because it successfully frustrates anyone who has two or more functional braincells. Something that his followers evidently do not have. But if they did they wouldn't be theists. Let's be honest, his arguments aren't even worse than that of any other theist; they're all arrogant liars who assume they're right. The only difference is that Kent knows better and just keeps pretending to not understand what evolution teaches. That's what makes him so frustrating.
@stylis666 you don't have the 1, how did abiogenesis happen?? "OH we dont want to talk about that" LOL stumped straight away. Just wanna jump straight to life already here. And the rest is just garbage , a fairytale, you IMAGINE haha like SpongeBob.
@@abaker4692iether with actual evidence provided by the society community at large. Or the statements he make no sense ,are begging the question, are asserted without any evidence. Or based on horrible understanding or purposely misrepresentation of the actual facts.
"Dogs will always bring forth dogs." Hovind continues to deny how macroevolution takes place over long periods of time. It is important to recall that we use the word “species” to classify animals and it does not pose any limit to the varieties and development of animals. Species change their gene material generation by generation. 10 000 years into the future the dogs will not be equal to the dogs we have today. Should we still call them dogs? This shows how a static language does not keep up with the dynamics of animal changes. Another example of this is two birds that are classified as the same species today, but many generations into the future their descendants have become so different that they can no longer interbreed, and they ought to be classified as different species.
I had the same thought. I remember one debate where Hovind gave an example of dogs coming in different sizes and appearances. While remaining in the same category, they are to be classified as being dogs. My question is, "Will chihuahuas and Labradors stay in that same category 10,000 years in the future, or are there going to be more breakthroughs in science that will allow us to generate more sub categories?" "If my dog were to suddenly evolve like a Pokémon and grow hooves, a massive horn and a Texas sized dong. Will it still be a dog?"
His Bible doesn’t say anything about plants living longer or getting bigger so a fossil being larger than its present counterparts isn’t evidence for the Bible. At all.
@@edgein8632 no, it made kent look like a dishonest fool. The mosquitoes that evolved were still because of the fact of evolution you don’t out grow your ancestry. Just like they’ll still be insects and eukaryotes. Denying the fact AJ pointed out exposes your dishonesty.
@@stevencorey7623 You are as clueless as AJ. The mosquitoes, Darwin’s finches, polar bears turning white…etc, all happens by a loss of information. That’s why the mosquitoes always stay mosquitoes….they never build new parts. Micro evolution or adaptive change never changes a mosquito into anything other than a mosquito. Evolution from a common first cell would require the creation of hundreds of thousands of new proteins from scratch which would change a mosquito into something not a mosquito….that cannot happen because there is no biological process to make new proteins by random chance.
@@davidluciano9478 He has been given plenty of scientific answers. Those answers are bad for his business of grifting lies though so he cannot acknowledge them.
Allow me to correct you, is not "evlution", but "evolutionists" who have failed to explain the origen. Some people here argue that Hovind always repeat the same arguments, but if they're true, why change? On the other hand why do evolutionists need to change?
@@JulianH-co7qg What you're looking for is the study of abiogenesis. Evolution just covers the study of the process by which life changes over time and adapts to different environmental niches.
He didn’t say it like the words in your quotes but he was only classifying it as it’s taken in faith there is s no factual basis ithere for it’s faith not factual as science. Then it he says it’s criminal because it’s total baloney progamdizimg kids so they can be ripe for the criminal and dangerous political system of communism and much more. A society that has no reason for morality always in time becomes dangerous murderous and oppressive society as evolution is based on survival of those that can dominate and there is zero reason or authority for any morality whatsoever in a atheistic evolution based belief and will lead to things like the elites killing off your class of people and there’s be zero wrong with that under evolutionary atheist beliefs your quality life will be zero, that’s why it’s criminal . Just admit you have a short sighted small mind
@@nathanameru7654 not really. one talks about how life changes, one about the origins of life and one about the expansion of the universe and possibly its origin, depending on who you ask. any of the three could be proven wrong and it wouldn't effect the nature or validity of the others
It’s that way for a lot of conspiracy theorists. Everything they don’t understand or are skeptical of they have to lump it all together into some kind of “great lie”. It’s how they make sense of it in their head, they are the heroes versus the deceivers in their mind. If they had critical thinking skills they wouldn’t be in these positions to begin with.
@@russellg9622you should apply that logic to yourself but in reference to religion. You just don’t understand and lack critical thinking so that is why you are not religious. lol. If you want people to understand evolution then you should produce objective evidence for it, so it can be observed and repeated. If you can’t you believe in magic and use time of the gaps to fill in the unknowns. Then mock others who don’t adopt your religion (evolution) as a reality. lol
Im so sick of this content. Only so many times i can hear kent say the same thing and never move from his position even after being proven wrong i think its just beating a dumb horse at this point.
@@kennytendo7255 Chances are he wouldn't believe it was god cause god is telling him something he doesn't want to hear. reminds me of an old harry's game skit.
Funny thing is that it never was. An ideology based on how special your group is, and how are the only ones knowing the hidden truth and how ignorant everyone else because they brake theor asses off by actually being humble and studying is the perfect pool for the likes of Hovind or Qanon to rise from.
I know right, like the fact millions of years never happened Evolution is slow and gradual except when it is fast. It is dynamic and creates huge changes over time, except when it keeps everything the same for millions of years. It explains both extreme complexity and elegant simplicity. It tells us how birds learned to fly and yet also lost that ability. Evolution made cheetahs fast and turtles slow. Some creatures it made big and others small; some gloriously beautiful and others boringly grey. It forced fish to walk and walking animals to return to the sea. It diverges except when it converges; it produces exquisitely fine-tuned designs except when it produces junk. Evolution is random and without direction except when it moves toward a target. Life under evolution is a cruel battlefield except when it displays altruism. Evolution explains virtues and vice, love and hate, religion and atheism. And it does all this with a growing number of ancillary hypotheses. Modern evolutionary theory is the Rube Goldberg of theoretical constructs. And what is the result of all this speculative ingenuity? Like the defunct theory of phlogiston, it explains everything while
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs Your not too bright are you ! Evolution does not have a direction Its FAST with organisms that live a day or 2 its not hard to understand except to those who are backed into iron age ignorance
You have 0 evidence because millions of years never happened. Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Scientists define evolution as variation? What a LIE! Kent nails it again and again you evolutionists play footloose and fancy free with your definitions of evolution.
Lmao AJ was projecting the exact same can be said about AJ and you atheists in general. The lack of self awareness about your atheist bias makes debated with most of you futile.
You are a fool and your reply is childish. Your precious book is chock full of nothing but confirmation bias, contradictions, complete fantasy and plageriasms. You theists always love to say we are just ignoring the god you claim exists as if I wasn't successfully brainwashed for the first half of my life, as if I didn't give many years in a sincere search to find him in reality. Only when I decided to read that book in its entirety did I realize it does absolutely nothing to explain how or why this reality is here. Believe whatever you like just stop trying to force your beliefs on others and it's fine. Go beyond your bible, go to school and learn some actual history.
@@fletcher373the problem is that there are plenty of theists that accept evolution, Catholic Church being one example but you will pretty much never find an atheist that believes in young earth.
Straw manning and deliberate misrepresentation will work as well. He just keeps repeating the same lies he has been corrected on for decades. I would sum Kent up with the word _frustrating._
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs You absolutely can fuse past iron. The problem is that it consumes, rather than produces, energy. Therefore it can usually be achieved naturally in things like supernovae. There are some weird processes that can happen where they are produced in stars, but those are rare and inefficient.
@@stylis666 Nuclear fusion. Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
i dont know what it is but these 2 moderators make me nervous, but they seemed great for this one, and you did awesome not letting him play games with your words AJ! keep up the good work, you are underappreciated for what you do
@@MrShigura thats what i thought, didnt want to toss around anything i couldnt remember for certain though, plus he seemed to fawn over "the 'science' gent" near the end a bit much lmao
@@lawrence1318 🤣How idiotic. What you are saying is that unless you know what started an avalanche, you can't figure out that snow coming down the mountain. There is NOTHING in evolution that depends on abiogenesis. All evolution is saying is that the distribution of the heritable traits are changing in a population over time. When evolution was proposed, people didn't know about DNA or RNA. And even after DNA was discovered, they didn't know about epigenetic factors. Now, tell me. WHAT aspect of evolution do you think would change if abiogenesis had a different cause. Instead of making asinine, ignorant pronouncements that has NO evidence behind it, why don't you make a little effort to learn the science in good-faith so that you CAN make an intelligent comment? Don't be a dumb sheep just spouting whatever you hear on whatever creationist site you frequent.
Where's the evolution? "According to our experimental experience only an intelligent source is capable of meeting these requirements, instructions, codes, languages, and code conventions. The fact that only one single genetic language exists indicates that one single intelligent source must have been responsible for the single genetic code of all polyphylogenetic biology. There is no other solution." -A.E. Wilder-Smith 3x phd organic chemist
50:00 we finally find out where Kent gets his "there is no geologic column" assertion. I am completely unsurprised that he gets it from deliberately misrepresenting a children's textbook.
Millions of years never happened. Can't have fossilized tracks preceding the actual animals by millions of years. They were trying to escape a flood. A worldwide flood. How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed.
I have a question, maybe you can answer it. Is there a difference in age of the dirt on the earth ast he geo column represents. I am really confused on this. Layers don't represent different ages of dirt. So i want to know what that means!
@@adriansoto239The question is slightly malformed. The stratigraphic column is not composed of dirt. (the age of dirt, as well as most rock, can't be measured.) What the stratigraphic column describes the order of the layers, both in a given place and more globally. Because of the way that layers form, it is a certainty that the layers first formed are at the bottom. Hence, we can certainly say that, in a given location, the layers are arranged by age from youngest at the top to oldest at the bottom. This can only establish relative ages, of course. Now, as to establishing the absolute ages, we need to use things like radiometric dating to do that, which we can get to if you want to.
@@adriansoto239 @adriansoto239 Not exactly. The traditional radiometric dating method has base assumptions 1) The speed of radiometric decay is constant. 2) The starting condition of all parent and no 'daughter' elements. 3) That no parent or daughter element enters or leaves the material. For the first, there are no known conditions that scientists have managed to create that changes the rate, so this seems reasonable until proven wrong. For the second, those are accounted by selecting the right material. For example, Uranium-lead dating is generally done on zircon crystals. Thanks to the chemical composition, Uranium cn integrate into zircon crystal, while the daughter products of the decay can't. Hence, a pure crystal satisfies assumption 2. Third, as the crystal is solid, daughter material can only leave the sample if it was heated up after forming. This generally leaves other marks on the material, and thus assumption 3 is also safe. It is also possible to use multiple dating methods on the same sample to confirm the age and check for potential errors. There's also the limitations of ages too young to be dated, which varies by the isotopes used. There needs to be enough time for daughter material to build up in the sample. (I think Uranium-lead gets us to the oldest ages, or just about. It can be used in very select materials, and so can only be used to date layers where such materials are present.)
Where is the proof for evolution? There is none, therefore, evolution is a hard core religion also because it requires faith to believe in something you can't prove.
@@edsalaz7090 You seem confused. Science isn't intended to PROVE anything. Science is just a methodology for obtaining the most accurate understanding of our world. However, science DOES provide a vast wealth of supporting evidence for evolutionary theories. Far more than any theological fairy tale that I've read.
you are so smart, 99.99% of all scientists in the world believe in something that apparently has nothing to back it up. You are misusing the word proof which shows you are not qualified to speak on the subject@@edsalaz7090
@@6UAXINIM9 On Einstein, for evolution to happen there must be a biological process to create new proteins to make new body parts…..what is that process? Hint, this is what Hovind is saying does not exist and why evolution is impossible…..find it. When you cannot you need to apologize.
@@davidinsf2680ugh I had teachers like that in southern WV public schools. Not many; but a few. If you're familiar with Owen Morgan (telltale unfiltered, etc.) & his story about his daughter's health teacher in WV preaching in class, & his lawsuit....I basically experienced the same thing, minus the lawsuit
I think the best of him stumbling was when he was in the big love debate with aron ra and a few other (names escape me at the moment) and he just kept repeating ( I wasn't prepared for that) show just how little he actually knows and less so when dealing with people in the actual scientific field of any study.
What lies? The only liars I see are the ones who peddle ape men fairy tales to little kids. Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
@@woutermortier2771 Answer the question. How do you get fossilized tracks in strata, millions of years before the strata in which the actual animals appeared LOL? A gobal flood is how. Millions of years never happened. “Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains: “This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.” Dr. Marcus Ross Phd paleontologist
I know right. Hard to believe people believe rocks came to life, on their own, out of nowhere, from nothing, complete with 4 digit, 4 dimensional genetic code with gigabytes in the simplest cell on Earth, a protozoa.
@@lawrence1318 Your're right, we were created by a Magic man, who lives in the Sky, who was his own Father, and sacrificed himself to himself...makes perfect sense
@@duckarse11 No I'm wrong. You're right. We all got here from nothing. It's obvious and makes perfect sense. Makes even more sense to talk about it. (You know, the result of nothing, talking about itself.)
I'd like to thank Kent. Without him ignorance, obstinance and misinformation would not have specific definitions. Also, thank you for helping to reaffirm that the understanding of science through the proper education of it, support clear thought! Now, go enjoy a banana with Ray Comfort.
@scorp10fl53 Just because someone takes a position that you disagree with doesn't make them stupid. And as we see here with you, definitely doesn't make you smarter. Or maybe you think that because you can't understand anything they are talking about. Your free to say and think what you want but you look like a complete idiot.
Anyone with a sane mind would not be paying taxes, your ancestors started revolutions and civil wars over 2% TAX. Meanwhile today you have over 40% taxation... are you one of those masochists that says to government that doesn't have your best interest in mind because they're controled by i+r+e+ : "TAX ME HARDER DADDY" ??? :DDD
Do you believe you came from a rock? That’s dumb. Also it says here god took the dust and made man. But that’s true? This is neither an argument for or against either evolution nor creation but if you’re trying to disprove something by saying it is dumb, and then later saying it’s true… it’s not really a good argument is it?
@carnajom8831 that's what I'm saying. Whether a rock or dust it's the same thing . What is dust if not crushed rock ? And I guess u can pose that question stupid enough . Like do u believe u came from rock? But I don't think anyone believes they came from a rock. We arnt Neanderthals. Lol
@@knic7 yeah exactly. Sorry maybe worded badly but was just supporting your point and also how that regardless which side of the debate someone is on taking a complete hyperbole and saying “that’s dumb” doesn’t refute the claim. Man his arguments make me so angry. “Observation”… have you observed it? The same arguments that were used to promote miasma theory and spontaneous generation in the face of germ theory and well… that maggots came from flies. despite the various observations of evidence and effects.
Wait a minute... If the earth turning caused water to move in the way Kent suggested, then how did ancient civilizations use water to make level foundations for their buildings? Why are water levels accurate? Something ain't right here...
@@AtheistJr It’s only interesting to someone low IQ. The moon’s gravity only works on large bodies of water not something used for a tool. You have to do better AJ
AJ you did phenomenal! In my opinion, I think this is the best you’ve debated against the convicted hovind. Sharp shooter and yet you made sure you let him rant about how much he opposes science while claims hes scientific. Lol
@@edgein8632 I really don’t care what a person looks like. It’s about pointing out how hilariously wrong hovind is. As I said I pointed out key questions with him and let’s him rant.
@@stevencorey7623 Ok Stephen, here is what Hovind is saying so prove it wrong. It is impossible for an organism to randomly create new proteins from scratch to build new multi part systems to make new body parts to create the tree of life. Now, to prove him wrong you must provide the mechanism that makes new proteins that work together by chance. Hint, there is none. You need to apologize for being so clueless.
Kent’s spiel about “we can’t prove it had a living baby” is so funny. Mr. Dino sir, how do you think these previous generations survived if non of them were producing offspring? Due to the fact that producing offspring is necessary to survive, we can expect that many of these specimens had children. We can’t prove that one *specific* fossil had a child, but we know that the type of animal that the fossil was, definitely did have children
@@AtheistJr You're a joke buddy. Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
@@stylis666 Besides peddling Godless apeman fairytales to little kids? Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Kent is so far outside his depth at this point, its embarrassing. Since he hasn't updated or researched anything since 1979, his script is woefully inadequate & even the most basic questions are impossible for him.
@@abaker4692 but the point is that kent kept saying "you believe this and that." If AJ said no, I don't believe it, I know it, then Kent might shut up.
"Why are fossils not being formed today when so many organisms continue to die? Rapid burial must take place. Quickly covered by sediment. Today most dead organisms are consumed by scavengers or decay." Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
You can always count on Kent to Gish Gallup, and strawman. I hate Kent Hovin. Why do you waste your time AJ. Kent: "I want to see a mosquito turn in to a banana. "
My favorite is when Kent said he doesn't want his taxes to fund evolution being taught in school, as if he paid taxes. Didn't you go to prison for not paying taxes Kent?
Kent clearly doesn’t know all of the information that can be discovered from a fossilized organism. He can deny it for the rest of his life but that won’t make him correct for saying all we know about a fossil is that it died.
“Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains: “This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.” Dr. Marcus Ross Phd paleontologist
Kent is quote mining which is bad enough. But even worse he is quote mining "magazines". Does he think actual scientists and biologists and paleontologists and archaeologists and geologists and geneticists etc. etc. get their data from magazines?
@@StandingForTruthMinistriesI’ve never seen Kent actually debate anything. I’ve seen him repeat his sad little misinformed sermons whilst educated people try to correct him.
@@StandingForTruthMinistriesthere is no evolution debate challenge. You can take the smartest con of a creationist debate a typical average person that took a few biology courses in high school and wins. It still wouldn’t debunk evolutionary theory.
@@stevencorey7623 Millions of years never happened to support your apeman fairytale. Stop grooming kids, groomer. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
I love how you called out Donny and Kent in your first rebuttal statement about how could you possibly stick to one topic when Kent is always the one who throws out all kinds of various topics and statements. They funnily never call him out on that. 😅
If kent talks for long enough he starts making a case for evolution then eventually realises gets clearly uncomfortable and desperatly wants to move onto a new point 😂
Thats because he knows evolution is real. He is a charlatan. He uses the creation narrative because his sheep followers keep throwing money in his direction
Example of making a case for the fairytale apeman religion?? Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Doesn't Kent get tired from his "Clams produce clams" ? He's been doing that in literally every single video for years. Also, every single child is different from their parents. And funny he would say "corn produces corn and carrots produce carrots" maybe he should look up where those two things came from.
Yet you cannot form a cogent argument, shame on you hypocrite. This atheist is the fairly typical uneducated evolutionist which are ubiquitous on this site. One definition, as a Latin noun, used in the phrase in specie: In kind In order for speciation to be considered a different kind of specie , this miracle must be at the family level or higher in biological taxonomy. The evolutionist will always disallow abiogenesis as a precursor to biological evolution as it destroys their belief system. Please answer the following. Characterize the chemical and electrical processes which created the first self-replicating cell.
Please characterize the chemical, electrical and biological processes which started biological evolution. Please characterize the biological and chemical and electric properties which created the human mind. Time is the enemy of biology any undergraduate in biology could verify that from one hour to two weeks destroy biological experiments. This following is a chemical characterization to alter a cell wall which contains 40.000 different type of lipids. This is an excerpt from a 175 page characterization. Episulfide 37. To an oven dried three-neck round bottom flask charged with hydrazone 33(.099g, 4.7 mmol) and MgSO4 0.49 g. 50% w/w was added dichloromethane (25mL). To this suspension was added quickly MnO2 (1.26 g. 18 mmol, Sigma-Aldrich>90%) bath ranging from at ca. -5 °C to -10 °C for 1.5h. After this period, the reaction mixture was cooled to -50 °C and then transferred to a Schlenk filtration tube connect to an oven dried three-neck round bottom flask . The deep-purple filtrate that contained intermediate 36 was collected, and the Schlenk tube was rinsed with pre-cooled dicholoromethane (20 ml, -50 °C). To the flask containing the combined filtrate, thione 35 (0.97 g, 2.5 mmol) was added portionwise until no more N2 evolved. The mixture was stirred for an additional 0.5 h at ambient temperature. The mixture was poured into methonal (80 mL) with vigorous stirring and white precipitate formed. The solid was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with methanol (30 mL) under vacuum to afford the desired 37 (1.19 g, 84%). Use any source in the universe to reply. If you conclude that the answer to the above questions is "these are not possible" then you would be correct.
so..... let me get this straight ... the "flood" sorted the layers so that the gravel is at the bottom then silt then clay ... so how comes he says that where he lives it goes "Gravel sand clay gravel sand clay......" etc... how many "floods" were there?
@@bernardlongwe7330 Kent Strawmans the claims of evolution persistently. Strawmanning is misrepresenting an opponent's position. Kent has been corrected on his strawmanning over and over and over. Hence, if he misrepresents the claim after being corrected he's knowingly lying. That's one of DOZENS of examples. Even if one were to be charitable and say he's not lying, his default position is one vof intellectual dishonesty, given he ignores any information that counters his c arguments. He's weaseley, dodgey, and dishonest, and that's blatant.
I hope all is well for you and I can’t wait for us to talk again! You’ve been kinder to my friends than anyone and I just wanted to lift you up and say hi! Anyways rock n roll!
Huh? Millions of years never happened. Can't have fossilized tracks preceding the actual animals by millions of years. They were trying to escape a flood. A worldwide flood. How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed.
@@tyrannotherium7873 Actually, millions of years never happened. Can't have fossilized tracks in strata millions of years before strata in which the actual animals appeared. Oops. “Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains: “This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.” Dr. Marcus Ross Phd paleontologist
Where is the evolution? What a lying fraud you. Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
@@woutermortier2771 How do you get fossilized tracks in strata, millions of years before the strata in which the actual animals appeared LOL? “Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains: “This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.” Dr. Marcus Ross Phd paleontologist
@@edgein8632 it works for general kinds like birds but doesn't do well when we get to specific species. like duck, eagle, or ostrich. all are birds but cant mix breed and are drink enough physically and genetically to be their own thing.
@@edgein8632 nope. again people use it for general things but it is false apart when you get into specifics. less so since the bible and kent never properly define the word and science is all about being precise and clear as possible.
Kent agrees the mosquitos are different kinds at 15:25ish when he says "if they are capable of bringing forth, aka having babies, they're the same kind" Edit: still watching, AJ points this out though
Life from clay by intelligent design or life from rocks out of nowhere from nothing, with 0 evidence, complete with gigabytes of 4 digit, 4 dimensional genetic code?
Quit brainwashing little kids into believing there is no God with your half-breed apemen millions of years fairy tale garbage. Millions of years never happened. "It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried." "It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals." "How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Someone should ask Kent to which kind tadpoles belong - fish or frog? And at which stage of metamorphosis they switch from one kind to another? When they lose gills, or when they grow legs and lungs?
@@edgein8632but if you find the fossil of a tadpole, how could you prove it would change into something else? It's just "bones in the dirt", bones in the dirt don't change.
Metamorphosis variation within existing genetic code. Show me a tuna which is growing legs LOL. Where's the "considerable developmental repattering" to fill the "large morphological gap" between fins and feet? Oops. “There remains a large morphological gap between them and digits as seen in, for example, Acanthostega: if the digits evolved from these distal bones, the process must have involved considerable developmental repatterning..” (Clack & Ahlberg, Nature 440:748
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs Tunas don't grow legs. But there are fish who seem to be evolving their fins into appendages functioning like legs. It's an example of convergent evolution.
54:18 Said Pregnancy test here. Meant to say Paternity test.
You also said all life came from an amoeba with 0 evidence whatsoever.
Either way, you can't have fossilzed tracks millions of years before the actual fossilized animals. Millions of years never happened.
"We conclude that these data are most easily explained by the global flood model."
Stratigraphic Distribution of Vertebrate Fossil Footprints Compared with Body Fossils-by Leonard R. Brand, James Florence
That's funny though. Speaking of funny, here's a joke:
Kent walks into a debate and says something truthful without also implying something false or manipulative or following it up with something stupid and false.
Convinced by the evidence that something good can come from bad people Kent becomes an atheist and apologizes for his decades of childish behaviour.
@@stylis666
666 lol. You're a joke buddy.
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Next time Kent says " even a 5 year old will say x is related to y" you should ask him how likely he thinks it will be for a 5 year old to correctly guess the animals that are related to a platypus.
I Google fossilized mosquito. It said 80 million years old. Funny how after "80 million years" a mosquito is still a mosquito LOL. Oops.
(As if millions of years were a real thing)
6:35 is when I checked out. Kent is rehashing literally the exact same points he has been corrected on in every single debate. AronRa and GutsickGibbon both broke it down in such a way that he had to deliberately choose to ignore what they were saying, and I can already tell it's going to happen again. Perhaps it's time to simply let Kent fade into obscurity and stop giving him the attention he craves. He got plenty of that from the courts already.
The debate channels love Kent, love or hate him, he brings in the views. I've watched him that many times, I could probably say his stupid script word for word.
Every time he annoys me, but he is like a car wreck. you'll always look!
Yeah I’m starting to agree. I mean Kent will never change especially since it’s his income.
Don't forget he's a wife beater and hangs out with paedos.
Proven narcissist.
Hovind is boring also was he not locked up?
@@ashwayn
Yes, he was and found guilty in court for assaulting his ex wife.
There's an audio of him being abusive.
There's a whole documentary on him, he's a proven narcissist. 🤷🏼♂️
Something to do with tax evasion too, but I don't understand American tax laws, so I don't get that part.
If a mosquito can fly because it's really small, does that mean Kunt's brain can fly, because that makes a mosquito look large and ungainly.
As they say everyone has an opinion like they have an a hole. Well thought out comment dumbazz. Typicall thinking of childlike mind. Keep up the good work.
@@brucesmith8285 why thank you.
Just because it's small doesn't mean it can fly, after decades of disuse, I'm sure it's completely atrophied.
A debate with a guy like Kent is a waste of energy and time.
He is a scammer, you know it, he knows it and the rest should have been warned by now.
Nobody youtuber or 3x phd organic chemist? Oops.
According to our experimental experience only an intelligent source is capable of meeting these requirements, instructions, codes, languages, and code conventions. The fact that only one single genetic language exists indicates that one single intelligent source must have been responsible for the single genetic code of all polyphylogenetic biology. There is no other solution."
-A.E. Wilder-Smith
3x phd organic chemist
@@JimmyTony-uu2xsAnd this Wilder-Smith's word is as valuable as toilet paper. He needs to bring evidence to show that it's designed. Pointing out complexity and just deciding _"Hmmm, this must be designed by someone!"_ is *not. enough.*
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs a chemist saying god exists doesnt make god exist.
"I only have 4 dollars"
"Someone loan me 5 dollars to make it 10"
This man says he taught math to children....
It doesn't matter if h is math doesn't add up. Kent doesn't have any money. Everything in his possession belongs to God. He stated that under oath in a court of law.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed lol
"I only have 4 dollars on me" is kind of a flex for the pick yourself up by your bootstraps, nose to the grind stone types.
he has no formal education but he does have a list of criminal offenses. Borat did make fun of him once for a floater in the toilet which was hilarious.
@@purefoldnz3070it was Ali G but it was hilarious.
Despite having no scientific credentials or even an accredited degree, Hovind presents himself as someone who understands the science of evolution better than people with advanced science degrees who research in labs and publish peer-reviewed papers. During his presentations, he sounds like a stand-up comedian when he attacks evolution, or a used car salesman when he is attempting to make a point by getting his audience to buy a video or book from him. Many of his slideshows read like a top 10 list of commonly seen (and refuted) arguments for creationism that contain little to no actual data or proof. These arguments are interjected with painfully unfunny "jokes" and anecdotes, which are topped off with a healthy serving of mined quotes.
From RationalWiki? 😂😂
So why is Hovind conflating biological evolution with abiogenesis, cosmic evolution , geological evolution et al which have nothing to do with biological evolution ? He’s either ignorant or dishonest . He’s been schooled on this so many times which means that he’s being wilfully dishonest.
Nothing Hovind says about evolution can be proven wrong….not a single thing. If you were educated you would know this.
Notice that Kent always says the flood sorted the animals by density but AJ got Kent to admit that they should all be mixed together. Very scholarly.
Evolution (man evolving from apes) is pure fantasy. Give me just one observable evidence for evolution that doesn’t require faith?
Every living thing produces after their kind, humans produce humans and dogs produce dogs, etc.
There are different variations within a kind (which is biblical) but living things remain within their own.
The theory of evolution and the big bang is anti-science because it's not observable or testable.
There are so many problems with those theories.
Like, where did all the complex elements that supposedly made us come from?
Evolutionary scholars believe that the creation of life involved waters but here's the big problem with that. Sunlight and water destroy DNA, the very thing that destroys DNA somehow assembled it?
So how did the DNA code originate?
What came first-DNA or the repair enzymes that are necessary to maintain DNA? You need both at the same time, the information for the repair enzymes is encoded into the DNA itself. This all has to be true simultaneously or living things don’t exist.
Just so many problems these theories can't answer because it's nothing more than political propaganda and yet we wonder why our society is the way it is.
Who determines what good and evil are?
👉Society does not determine morality.👈
I'm only saying these things because your life matter to God, he created you with a purpose. He has been misrepresented by people who don't know him, Christianity is not church attendance and religion is dead but having a personal relationship with God is everything.
It's a pretty safe bet that none of Kent's tax dollars fund public schools or anything for that matter
His stay in prison probably costed the tax payer more than he is ever contributed.
the tax payer paid for his time in jail.
@@purefoldnz3070
Taxpayers pay to brainwash little kids into believing there is no God, only made possible by peddling the "milliins of years" fraud. Can't have fossilized tracks millions of years before the animal showed up.
"We conclude that these data are most easily explained by the global flood model."
Stratigraphic Distribution of Vertebrate Fossil Footprints Compared with Body Fossils-by Leonard R. Brand, James Florence
personal attacks is not what people come here for.
@@jacobsr51 um.. well you better tell Kent that because thats all he does. If he cant take then he shouldnt dish it out. Even more so for convicted felons.
The more people's arguments against Kent change, the more his script stays the same.
1+1 will always equal 2. Lol
@@nzifb7409 Except Kent doesn't have a 1. He starts with an off topic straw man about the origins of life. Has been explained for about 30 years by dozens of people that the origins of life are irrelevant to evolution. And then he deliberately misunderstands what evolution teaches by saying it teaches we came from a rock, which again is about the origins of life and have nothing to do with evolution.
And then he wants an example of something that would disprove evolution: an animal producing offspring of a different species.
He has been explained that evolution predicts that the next generation of any organism will be the same species for thousands of times over about 30 years as well.
Kent has 0 correct information and 0+0 will always be 0. All he does is deliberately misunderstand like a child. He has done this since his first debate and he hasn't changed his tactic. That isn't because anything he says is true but because it successfully frustrates anyone who has two or more functional braincells. Something that his followers evidently do not have. But if they did they wouldn't be theists. Let's be honest, his arguments aren't even worse than that of any other theist; they're all arrogant liars who assume they're right. The only difference is that Kent knows better and just keeps pretending to not understand what evolution teaches. That's what makes him so frustrating.
@stylis666 you don't have the 1, how did abiogenesis happen?? "OH we dont want to talk about that" LOL stumped straight away. Just wanna jump straight to life already here. And the rest is just garbage , a fairytale, you IMAGINE haha like SpongeBob.
@@nzifb7409Lmao no proof for God. Believe in your omnipotent devil god
@vicarameila1418 shut up walking meatsack, that evolved from same ancestor as ape.
Kent's script hasn't changed for years. His arguments have been debunked countless times and yet he continues to use them.
Debunked how?
@@abaker4692iether with actual evidence provided by the society community at large. Or the statements he make no sense ,are begging the question, are asserted without any evidence. Or based on horrible understanding or purposely misrepresentation of the actual facts.
Kent's arguments don't have to change because he is arguing against the same strawman since he started his ministry.
@@abaker4692 Which issue? Look up the global flood and see for yourself.
@@zoso4269*using* the same strawmen
"Dogs will always bring forth dogs." Hovind continues to deny how macroevolution takes place over long periods of time. It is important to recall that we use the word “species” to classify animals and it does not pose any limit to the varieties and development of animals. Species change their gene material generation by generation. 10 000 years into the future the dogs will not be equal to the dogs we have today. Should we still call them dogs? This shows how a static language does not keep up with the dynamics of animal changes. Another example of this is two birds that are classified as the same species today, but many generations into the future their descendants have become so different that they can no longer interbreed, and they ought to be classified as different species.
I had the same thought. I remember one debate where Hovind gave an example of dogs coming in different sizes and appearances. While remaining in the same category, they are to be classified as being dogs. My question is, "Will chihuahuas and Labradors stay in that same category 10,000 years in the future, or are there going to be more breakthroughs in science that will allow us to generate more sub categories?" "If my dog were to suddenly evolve like a Pokémon and grow hooves, a massive horn and a Texas sized dong. Will it still be a dog?"
Has anyone seen a mutt give birth to a pure bred Saint Bernard?
Youve seen micro evolution?
@@davidluciano9478 At what point does Micro Evolution become Macro Evolution?
Cite anything other than a dog which gave birth to a dog. Oops.
His Bible doesn’t say anything about plants living longer or getting bigger so a fossil being larger than its present counterparts isn’t evidence for the Bible. At all.
Giants aren't plants but same thought process.
@@abaker4692 i know giants aren’t plants but the Jackson was talking about horsetails that were 40ft tall.
Kent kept misrepresenting your mosquito argument even though you corrected him half a dozen times. Ponderous. Good Job AJ!
The mosquito argument made AJ look like a fool…..the mosquitoes will always stay mosquitoes…..nobody disputes that can adapt.
@@edgein8632 no, it made kent look like a dishonest fool. The mosquitoes that evolved were still because of the fact of evolution you don’t out grow your ancestry. Just like they’ll still be insects and eukaryotes. Denying the fact AJ pointed out exposes your dishonesty.
@@stevencorey7623 You are as clueless as AJ. The mosquitoes, Darwin’s finches, polar bears turning white…etc, all happens by a loss of information. That’s why the mosquitoes always stay mosquitoes….they never build new parts.
Micro evolution or adaptive change never changes a mosquito into anything other than a mosquito.
Evolution from a common first cell would require the creation of hundreds of thousands of new proteins from scratch which would change a mosquito into something not a mosquito….that cannot happen because there is no biological process to make new proteins by random chance.
@@edgein8632mosquitos are eukaryotes like humans. Or this part will be evaded in your argument?
@@edgein8632 Just because you are uneducated and did not understand it does not mean that it made AJ look like a fool
Ugh....a debate moderated by Sitting For Lies and Redefine Lying....this'll be fair and totally unbiased...for sure...
But it actually was! 👀
@@AtheistJr I’ll accept that it could have been worse
The only liars I see are the ones who peddle half-breed ape men to little kids.
Don't be late now for your drag Queen story hour for little kids.
Wouldn't it be easier to have kent on a broken record? He just repeats the same crap everytime.
for the last what, 40 years or so.
Probably because no one can give him a scientific answer....
speaking of records Kent does have a long list of criminal records.
You gotta buy the DVDs for that.
@@davidluciano9478 He has been given plenty of scientific answers. Those answers are bad for his business of grifting lies though so he cannot acknowledge them.
Evolution is not explaining the origin of life.
And your point being?
@@woutermortier2771 This is in response to what Kent said about evolution does not answer the question, how did life begin?
@jamescorletta
What is a species if not multicellular organisms? Evolution should explain how the first one formed.
Allow me to correct you, is not "evlution", but "evolutionists" who have failed to explain the origen. Some people here argue that Hovind always repeat the same arguments, but if they're true, why change? On the other hand why do evolutionists need to change?
@@JulianH-co7qg What you're looking for is the study of abiogenesis. Evolution just covers the study of the process by which life changes over time and adapts to different environmental niches.
All the ones that agree with me are right.
Wow how humble you are kent.
All those different scientific fields supposedly agreeing was one of the bottom right guys first points.
"Teaching a religion is criminal" - damn, Kent Hovind...I actually agree with you
Wonder how that 'we should teach all religions' will bite him in the azz in the future lol
He didn’t say it like the words in your quotes but he was only classifying it as it’s taken in faith there is s no factual basis ithere for it’s faith not factual as science. Then it he says it’s criminal because it’s total baloney progamdizimg kids so they can be ripe for the criminal and dangerous political system of communism and much more. A society that has no reason for morality always in time becomes dangerous murderous and oppressive society as evolution is based on survival of those that can dominate and there is zero reason or authority for any morality whatsoever in a atheistic evolution based belief and will lead to things like the elites killing off your class of people and there’s be zero wrong with that under evolutionary atheist beliefs your quality life will be zero, that’s why it’s criminal . Just admit you have a short sighted small mind
Its frustrating that kent keeps conflating evolution, abiogenis, and the big bang theory as one thing
Because it's part of it...
@@nathanameru7654 not really. one talks about how life changes, one about the origins of life and one about the expansion of the universe and possibly its origin, depending on who you ask. any of the three could be proven wrong and it wouldn't effect the nature or validity of the others
And Atheism lol
It’s that way for a lot of conspiracy theorists. Everything they don’t understand or are skeptical of they have to lump it all together into some kind of “great lie”. It’s how they make sense of it in their head, they are the heroes versus the deceivers in their mind. If they had critical thinking skills they wouldn’t be in these positions to begin with.
@@russellg9622you should apply that logic to yourself but in reference to religion. You just don’t understand and lack critical thinking so that is why you are not religious. lol. If you want people to understand evolution then you should produce objective evidence for it, so it can be observed and repeated. If you can’t you believe in magic and use time of the gaps to fill in the unknowns. Then mock others who don’t adopt your religion (evolution) as a reality. lol
Im so sick of this content. Only so many times i can hear kent say the same thing and never move from his position even after being proven wrong i think its just beating a dumb horse at this point.
It's like that one Peter in family guy got when he bought a horse. You know the mentally defective one that kept banging its head against the wall.
Kent keeps sucking people in so it’s important that people like AJ keep refuting him.
I like that AJ covers Kent Hovind. I'm looking forward to the news Kent Hovind is finally behind bars.
Even God could explain the existence of Evolution to him, and he still wouldn't get it.
@@kennytendo7255 Chances are he wouldn't believe it was god cause god is telling him something he doesn't want to hear. reminds me of an old harry's game skit.
It's funny how humility is supposed to be a christian virtue, but the godless athiest calls himself junior, and the christian pretends to be a doctor
Funny thing is that it never was.
An ideology based on how special your group is, and how are the only ones knowing the hidden truth and how ignorant everyone else because they brake theor asses off by actually being humble and studying is the perfect pool for the likes of Hovind or Qanon to rise from.
@@definitivamenteno-malo7919
Don't you have a drag Queen story hour for little kids to get to, groomer?
I love how ppl try so hard to deny evidence . But then base their beliefs on even worse evidence .
you mean _"non-evidence"_ because, the bible is littered with claims (or miracles/magic) that not a single person on this earth has proved to be true.
I know right, like the fact millions of years never happened
Evolution is slow and gradual except when it is fast. It is dynamic and creates huge changes over time, except when it keeps everything the same for millions of years. It explains both extreme complexity and elegant simplicity. It tells us how birds learned to fly and yet also lost that ability. Evolution made cheetahs fast and turtles slow. Some creatures it made big and others small; some gloriously beautiful and others boringly grey. It forced fish to walk and walking animals to return to the sea. It diverges except when it converges; it produces exquisitely fine-tuned designs except when it produces junk. Evolution is random and without direction except when it moves toward a target. Life under evolution is a cruel battlefield except when it displays altruism. Evolution explains virtues and vice, love and hate, religion and atheism. And it does all this with a growing number of ancillary hypotheses. Modern evolutionary theory is the Rube Goldberg of theoretical constructs. And what is the result of all this speculative ingenuity? Like the defunct theory of phlogiston, it explains everything while
@JimmyTony-uu2xs sounds more believable than an invisible man in the sky chose it to happen like that.
@@knic7yup
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs Your not too bright are you ! Evolution does not have a direction
Its FAST with organisms that live a day or 2 its not hard to understand except to those who are backed into iron age ignorance
Kent sees that dogs always produce dogs and that’s enough to convince him that a snake and donkey talked so….
Kent does believe in miracles.
U really know the Bible...
I just saw a talking snake in this video named aj.
And I saw a talking donkey when I watched an Aaron Ra video.
Did Hovid just said he would close down public schools if he could? 😂😂😂😂😂 what a tyrant!
It seems to be the conservative goal these years
Really. Her in PR they closed it and sold some to nepotism for $1.
AJ nailed it when he said Kent would not accept anything as evidence because it will conflict with his confirmation bias.
You have 0 evidence because millions of years never happened.
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Scientists define evolution as variation? What a LIE! Kent nails it again and again you evolutionists play footloose and fancy free with your definitions of evolution.
Lmao AJ was projecting the exact same can be said about AJ and you atheists in general. The lack of self awareness about your atheist bias makes debated with most of you futile.
You are a fool and your reply is childish. Your precious book is chock full of nothing but confirmation bias, contradictions, complete fantasy and plageriasms. You theists always love to say we are just ignoring the god you claim exists as if I wasn't successfully brainwashed for the first half of my life, as if I didn't give many years in a sincere search to find him in reality. Only when I decided to read that book in its entirety did I realize it does absolutely nothing to explain how or why this reality is here. Believe whatever you like just stop trying to force your beliefs on others and it's fine. Go beyond your bible, go to school and learn some actual history.
@@fletcher373the problem is that there are plenty of theists that accept evolution, Catholic Church being one example but you will pretty much never find an atheist that believes in young earth.
You hit the nail on the head. Kent will whine about "one topic at a time" but he will jump between multiple topics at will.
Everytime Kent pulls out a prop, my eyes almost roll out of my head. On the upside, I learn a lot from the people who debate him!
I feel like I am moving 9000 miles an hour when I listen to Kent’s nonsense
Holy shit, "projection" is the only way to describe Kent's opening.
Straw manning and deliberate misrepresentation will work as well. He just keeps repeating the same lies he has been corrected on for decades. I would sum Kent up with the word _frustrating._
OMG in his introduction Kent actually denied that nuclear fusion happens
it was hillarious
Can't fuse past iron so where does the gold come from? Oops
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs You absolutely can fuse past iron. The problem is that it consumes, rather than produces, energy. Therefore it can usually be achieved naturally in things like supernovae. There are some weird processes that can happen where they are produced in stars, but those are rare and inefficient.
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs What can't fuse past iron?
@@stylis666
Nuclear fusion.
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
i dont know what it is but these 2 moderators make me nervous, but they seemed great for this one, and you did awesome not letting him play games with your words AJ! keep up the good work, you are underappreciated for what you do
You should be nervous. SFT has been a TERRIBLE moderator in the past.
@@MrShigura thats what i thought, didnt want to toss around anything i couldnt remember for certain though, plus he seemed to fawn over "the 'science' gent" near the end a bit much lmao
1 looks like the ken and barbie killer paul bernardo and the other has the look of someone attempting to scrub away indescribable sin in their mind.
SFT usually joins in on Kent’s side. When things get tough, Kent tells the moderator what to do.
this is my favorite of my own comments, some of the best replies and i got a like from the creator! lol but fr you guys you're all awesome
Kent doesn't even understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution. Or stellar nucleosynthesis and evolution. Or big bang and evolution.
But he sure does understand how to get $$ out of people.
Rather, you don't understand that a process without a valid starting point is undefined and therefore of no scientific merit.
@@lawrence1318 🤣How idiotic. What you are saying is that unless you know what started an avalanche, you can't figure out that snow coming down the mountain.
There is NOTHING in evolution that depends on abiogenesis. All evolution is saying is that the distribution of the heritable traits are changing in a population over time. When evolution was proposed, people didn't know about DNA or RNA. And even after DNA was discovered, they didn't know about epigenetic factors.
Now, tell me. WHAT aspect of evolution do you think would change if abiogenesis had a different cause. Instead of making asinine, ignorant pronouncements that has NO evidence behind it, why don't you make a little effort to learn the science in good-faith so that you CAN make an intelligent comment?
Don't be a dumb sheep just spouting whatever you hear on whatever creationist site you frequent.
Sorry AJ I think you need to up your game. Kent clearly dominated this discussion
Kent’s go to line. (Insert object here) is more complicated than the space shuttle.
Is DNA more complicated than an Xbox?
It's one of many go-tos. Also, "You think a (insert animal here) came from a pine tree?"
Where's the evolution?
"According to our experimental experience only an intelligent source is capable of meeting these requirements, instructions, codes, languages, and code conventions. The fact that only one single genetic language exists indicates that one single intelligent source must have been responsible for the single genetic code of all polyphylogenetic biology. There is no other solution."
-A.E. Wilder-Smith
3x phd organic chemist
@@zoso4269 A little bit...
50:00 we finally find out where Kent gets his "there is no geologic column" assertion. I am completely unsurprised that he gets it from deliberately misrepresenting a children's textbook.
Millions of years never happened. Can't have fossilized tracks preceding the actual animals by millions of years. They were trying to escape a flood. A worldwide flood.
How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed.
I have a question, maybe you can answer it. Is there a difference in age of the dirt on the earth ast he geo column represents. I am really confused on this. Layers don't represent different ages of dirt. So i want to know what that means!
@@adriansoto239The question is slightly malformed. The stratigraphic column is not composed of dirt.
(the age of dirt, as well as most rock, can't be measured.)
What the stratigraphic column describes the order of the layers, both in a given place and more globally. Because of the way that layers form, it is a certainty that the layers first formed are at the bottom. Hence, we can certainly say that, in a given location, the layers are arranged by age from youngest at the top to oldest at the bottom. This can only establish relative ages, of course.
Now, as to establishing the absolute ages, we need to use things like radiometric dating to do that, which we can get to if you want to.
@@lasseaukio626 i sort of understand radio metric dating. If im correct, doesnt it pressupose an age if the parent element?
@@adriansoto239 @adriansoto239 Not exactly.
The traditional radiometric dating method has base assumptions
1) The speed of radiometric decay is constant.
2) The starting condition of all parent and no 'daughter' elements.
3) That no parent or daughter element enters or leaves the material.
For the first, there are no known conditions that scientists have managed to create that changes the rate, so this seems reasonable until proven wrong.
For the second, those are accounted by selecting the right material.
For example, Uranium-lead dating is generally done on zircon crystals.
Thanks to the chemical composition, Uranium cn integrate into zircon crystal, while the daughter products of the decay can't. Hence, a pure crystal satisfies assumption 2.
Third, as the crystal is solid, daughter material can only leave the sample if it was heated up after forming. This generally leaves other marks on the material, and thus assumption 3 is also safe.
It is also possible to use multiple dating methods on the same sample to confirm the age and check for potential errors.
There's also the limitations of ages too young to be dated, which varies by the isotopes used. There needs to be enough time for daughter material to build up in the sample.
(I think Uranium-lead gets us to the oldest ages, or just about. It can be used in very select materials, and so can only be used to date layers where such materials are present.)
1:04:37
Science is wrong, but his religion is correct on the basis of science. Brilliant
Where is the proof for evolution? There is none, therefore, evolution is a hard core religion also because it requires faith to believe in something you can't prove.
@@edsalaz7090 You seem confused. Science isn't intended to PROVE anything. Science is just a methodology for obtaining the most accurate understanding of our world. However, science DOES provide a vast wealth of supporting evidence for evolutionary theories. Far more than any theological fairy tale that I've read.
you are so smart, 99.99% of all scientists in the world believe in something that apparently has nothing to back it up. You are misusing the word proof which shows you are not qualified to speak on the subject@@edsalaz7090
@markcontini5396 you think people who understand kent would understand you ? 😂😂
Well done AJ. It was good seeing Hovind squirm as he tried to dodge your questions. How can you debate someone that doesn't know anything?
Hovind made AJ look like a fool. What are you talking about?
@@edgein8632 when I hear hovind speak I feel like an Einstein, when I heard AJ I felt like a hovind...
@@6UAXINIM9 On Einstein, for evolution to happen there must be a biological process to create new proteins to make new body parts…..what is that process? Hint, this is what Hovind is saying does not exist and why evolution is impossible…..find it. When you cannot you need to apologize.
@@edgein8632 The only fools are i) Hovind and ii) You, for listening to him.
@@edgein8632 logic and honesty isn’t your strong hold?
AJ killed it on this one! He finally stopped being polite and started calling him out on the BS!
Can you imagine having Hovind as a science teacher? 😂😂
I can. I was THAT kid (the skeptical "and how do we know?" kid), during my brief tenure in religious school
No, I think I would have walked out before he got very far into his schtick.
@@davidinsf2680ugh I had teachers like that in southern WV public schools. Not many; but a few.
If you're familiar with Owen Morgan (telltale unfiltered, etc.) & his story about his daughter's health teacher in WV preaching in class, & his lawsuit....I basically experienced the same thing, minus the lawsuit
Yes, I can and he would make a thousand times more sense than you.
@@syverexion He's a fool. If what he says makes sense to you, you're suffering from a lack of education. I'm sorry.
Good job AJ. I can’t remember hearing Kent stutter so much trying squirm his way out of his stupid lies.
I think the best of him stumbling was when he was in the big love debate with aron ra and a few other (names escape me at the moment) and he just kept repeating ( I wasn't prepared for that) show just how little he actually knows and less so when dealing with people in the actual scientific field of any study.
What lies? The only liars I see are the ones who peddle ape men fairy tales to little kids.
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
@@JimmyTony-uu2xsHow many time are you going to post the same comment in stead of thinking and learning a thing or 2?
@@woutermortier2771
Answer the question. How do you get fossilized tracks in strata, millions of years before the strata in which the actual animals appeared LOL? A gobal flood is how. Millions of years never happened.
“Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains:
“This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.”
Dr. Marcus Ross
Phd paleontologist
I can't see how you can have a serious debate with people who believe in magic and fairies.
I know right. Hard to believe people believe rocks came to life, on their own, out of nowhere, from nothing, complete with 4 digit, 4 dimensional genetic code with gigabytes in the simplest cell on Earth, a protozoa.
Look who's talking. Someone who believes we all got here from nothing.
@@lawrence1318 Your're right, we were created by a Magic man, who lives in the Sky, who was his own Father, and sacrificed himself to himself...makes perfect sense
@@duckarse11 No I'm wrong. You're right. We all got here from nothing. It's obvious and makes perfect sense. Makes even more sense to talk about it. (You know, the result of nothing, talking about itself.)
@@lawrence1318 I never said we come from nothing,Saying we come from nothing is dumb arse Theist bullshit.
This guy and his definitions.
I'd like to thank Kent.
Without him ignorance, obstinance and misinformation would not have specific definitions.
Also, thank you for helping to reaffirm that the understanding of science through the proper education of it, support clear thought!
Now, go enjoy a banana with Ray Comfort.
Character attacks are always the last defense of the weak
@@stephentucker2714 Fool. It's not a defense. It's a statement of appreciation based on observation.
@scorp10fl53 Just because someone takes a position that you disagree with doesn't make them stupid. And as we see here with you, definitely doesn't make you smarter. Or maybe you think that because you can't understand anything they are talking about. Your free to say and think what you want but you look like a complete idiot.
@@scorp10fl53 HONK!!🤡
@@scorp10fl53 WHat?????????????? what debate you watched???????? I can't find any facts for AJ statements about evolution, please watch again.
Jabs are safe and effective. I am science.
'Are you a tax payer kent?'
Lmao
To be fair, he's been saying he's sick of paying for this through taxes, for 20 years.
@@dylans482
Kinda like I'm sick of following speed limits
... I don't drive
yeah he has also done time for tax fraud@@dylans482
Anyone with a sane mind would not be paying taxes, your ancestors started revolutions and civil wars over 2% TAX. Meanwhile today you have over 40% taxation... are you one of those masochists that says to government that doesn't have your best interest in mind because they're controled by i+r+e+ : "TAX ME HARDER DADDY" ??? :DDD
He also has abused his several wives and allowed paedophilia to happen in front of him.
"Are you a tax payer, Kent?" 🤣🤣
He could have murdered his own mother and you still wouldn't have any evidence for your ape fairy religion.
On god I choked mid bong hit when he said that
@@SeedsnStems63
Prime ingredient in God's holy oil, exodus 30:23 --> Kaneh bos
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs you’re a true G for pointing that out, cheers 🥂💨
@@SeedsnStems63
Calamus is a king james lie
The hebrew is kaneh bos.
You're welcome.
Where kent here thinks an invisible man ( which there's no proof of) snapped his fingers and creatures just starting appearing out of thin air .
IKR?!
Kent: There is no evidence of evolution...
Also Kent: Our supernatural dad made everything.
Do you believe you came from a rock? That’s dumb. Also it says here god took the dust and made man. But that’s true? This is neither an argument for or against either evolution nor creation but if you’re trying to disprove something by saying it is dumb, and then later saying it’s true… it’s not really a good argument is it?
@carnajom8831 that's what I'm saying. Whether a rock or dust it's the same thing . What is dust if not crushed rock ? And I guess u can pose that question stupid enough . Like do u believe u came from rock? But I don't think anyone believes they came from a rock. We arnt Neanderthals. Lol
@@knic7 yeah exactly. Sorry maybe worded badly but was just supporting your point and also how that regardless which side of the debate someone is on taking a complete hyperbole and saying “that’s dumb” doesn’t refute the claim. Man his arguments make me so angry. “Observation”… have you observed it? The same arguments that were used to promote miasma theory and spontaneous generation in the face of germ theory and well… that maggots came from flies. despite the various observations of evidence and effects.
AJ: How does limestone form?
kent: From lime.
Wow such incredible intelligence!
A former science teacher. Just an endless source of information, just not very useful information. Funny information though XD Science Clown Kent.
You put the lime in the coconut…
I love it when Kent gets an opponent that treats him how he treats others.
Kent’s throat clearing needs to be considered a crime against humanity.
That is Kent’s “tell” of when he is shaken
He only clears his throat when telling a lie
@@diplomamilldoc8562 exactly
Wait a minute... If the earth turning caused water to move in the way Kent suggested, then how did ancient civilizations use water to make level foundations for their buildings? Why are water levels accurate? Something ain't right here...
Did you really ask that?
Interesting!
@@AtheistJr It’s only interesting to someone low IQ. The moon’s gravity only works on large bodies of water not something used for a tool. You have to do better AJ
@@edgein8632he did, so answer
@@twilightparanormalresearch186 The body of water must be large like an ocean for the moon’s gravity to affect it. That’s basic shit
1:04:20 you made his brain shut down for a minute with that one 🤣🤣🤣
Kent is a strawman cannon. But after all these years of him spewing his same old debunked arguments it is getting "kind" of boring... pun intended.
AJ you did phenomenal! In my opinion, I think this is the best you’ve debated against the convicted hovind. Sharp shooter and yet you made sure you let him rant about how much he opposes science while claims hes scientific. Lol
Really? AJ looked lost and had no clue
@@edgein8632 I really don’t care what a person looks like. It’s about pointing out how hilariously wrong hovind is. As I said I pointed out key questions with him and let’s him rant.
@@stevencorey7623 Ok Stephen, here is what Hovind is saying so prove it wrong. It is impossible for an organism to randomly create new proteins from scratch to build new multi part systems to make new body parts to create the tree of life.
Now, to prove him wrong you must provide the mechanism that makes new proteins that work together by chance.
Hint, there is none. You need to apologize for being so clueless.
@@edgein8632 You’ve no got a clue, eejit.
@@edgein8632 lost and no clue was the appearance hovind had when he was asked to explain how limestone was created. AJ knocked it out of the park
Kent’s spiel about “we can’t prove it had a living baby” is so funny. Mr. Dino sir, how do you think these previous generations survived if non of them were producing offspring? Due to the fact that producing offspring is necessary to survive, we can expect that many of these specimens had children. We can’t prove that one *specific* fossil had a child, but we know that the type of animal that the fossil was, definitely did have children
That's what I said!
@@AtheistJr
You're a joke buddy.
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
@@AtheistJr
Cat got your lying tongue?
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs What lie did AJ tell?
@@stylis666
Besides peddling Godless apeman fairytales to little kids?
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Kent is so painful to listen to.
Kent is so far outside his depth at this point, its embarrassing. Since he hasn't updated or researched anything since 1979, his script is woefully inadequate & even the most basic questions are impossible for him.
AJ you should say I don't believe it..I KNOW it.
Kent would say the same.
@@abaker4692 but the point is that kent kept saying "you believe this and that." If AJ said no, I don't believe it, I know it, then Kent might shut up.
@@perfectblindguy
Aj: All life came from amoeba
Also aj: an amoeba didn't change into anything other than it's kind
The part when hovind got lost when asked when the fossilization process had stopped working, was GOLD!
"Why are fossils not being formed today when so many organisms continue to die? Rapid burial must take place. Quickly covered by sediment. Today most dead organisms are consumed by scavengers or decay."
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
You can always count on Kent to Gish Gallup, and strawman. I hate Kent Hovin. Why do you waste your time AJ. Kent: "I want to see a mosquito turn in to a banana. "
Cite anything other than a mosquito which gave birth to a mosquito
My favorite is when Kent said he doesn't want his taxes to fund evolution being taught in school, as if he paid taxes. Didn't you go to prison for not paying taxes Kent?
Kent refuses to debate on "Proofs for Young Earth Creationism"
Kent clearly doesn’t know all of the information that can be discovered from a fossilized organism. He can deny it for the rest of his life but that won’t make him correct for saying all we know about a fossil is that it died.
“Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains:
“This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.”
Dr. Marcus Ross
Phd paleontologist
Dr kent?
That must be a lie.....what is he a doctor of?
He bought his doctorates from diploma mills. They’re worthless.
No real phd
What THEY don't want you to know:
AJ's eyes are CGI.
His glasses have greenscreen lenses.
Almost fooled me too.
I'm loving the green screen lenses! 🤣
Wait are they?
Lol. It’s a reflective coating.
Where would all the 7/11’s be found 😂😂😂😂😂😂 this is so dumb I can’t take Kent seriously. This is comedy gold
Kent is quote mining which is bad enough. But even worse he is quote mining "magazines". Does he think actual scientists and biologists and paleontologists and archaeologists and geologists and geneticists etc. etc. get their data from magazines?
Science sucks unless the scientists agree with me.
I wish Forest Valkai was here to straighten out this whole thing for Kents victims.
Forest is more than welcome to take our ongoing evolution debate challenge. I've never seen him engage in a formal or informal debate on the topic.
@@StandingForTruthMinistries
Knowing him he's probably deep in a research project about some critter.
@@StandingForTruthMinistriesI’ve never seen Kent actually debate anything. I’ve seen him repeat his sad little misinformed sermons whilst educated people try to correct him.
@@StandingForTruthMinistriesthere is no evolution debate challenge. You can take the smartest con of a creationist debate a typical average person that took a few biology courses in high school and wins. It still wouldn’t debunk evolutionary theory.
@@stevencorey7623
Millions of years never happened to support your apeman fairytale. Stop grooming kids, groomer.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
I love how you called out Donny and Kent in your first rebuttal statement about how could you possibly stick to one topic when Kent is always the one who throws out all kinds of various topics and statements. They funnily never call him out on that. 😅
Kent absolutely destroyed AJ as he has done in every debate
@@M7ReaperKent is a trash. He has been exposed as a fraud.🤣🤣🤡🤡
@@M7Reaper so funny .. so many undereducated
Mark Reid inspired that rebuttal.
Donny will even step in when he sees kent is trapped and help him out
This was the best take down of Hovid I've ever seen.
Thanks so much!
That is only because you are ill-educated and cannot form an cogent argument. You also lack any knowledge of biology.
The "Christian love" thing is disgusting. They just use it as a cover for bullying and hatred at this point.
Kents opening statement is the most backwards, hypocritical and unintelligent statement i have EVER heard in my life.
Google fossilized mosquito. It will say 80 million years.
Funny how after 80 million years a mosquito is still a mosquito.
Redefine Living is only here to mentally check out as soon as any discussion begins
And to blow smoke up Kent’s ass like Donny
No kidding. Religious jackass had his eyes closed for the majority of AJ's debate.
Great debate. AJ brought no evidence to prove his claim. Kent adds another win to his count.
Empty drivel.
You're delusional.😆
Do you genuinely think the entire earth flooded🤡
If kent talks for long enough he starts making a case for evolution then eventually realises gets clearly uncomfortable and desperatly wants to move onto a new point 😂
Thats because he knows evolution is real. He is a charlatan. He uses the creation narrative because his sheep followers keep throwing money in his direction
Example of making a case for the fairytale apeman religion??
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
I don't care about you enough to write the long response to this
@@Matt-gs9io
Translation --> you have jack sch1tt as evidenve for your apefairy fraud.
The atheist needs a lot of miracles to continue in their belief that God doesn't exist. We only need one.
Ever since a kid I could understand religions rely on a miracle. Like surviving a car crash or beating cancer
Doesn't Kent get tired from his "Clams produce clams" ? He's been doing that in literally every single video for years.
Also, every single child is different from their parents.
And funny he would say "corn produces corn and carrots produce carrots" maybe he should look up where those two things came from.
Kent’s kid was a mini Kunt
Cite anything other than corn which gave birth to corn. Oops.
Kent Hovind has a rock for a brain and still managed to learn how to talk and walk. Impressive!
Yet you cannot form a cogent argument, shame on you hypocrite. This atheist is the fairly typical uneducated evolutionist which are ubiquitous on this site.
One definition, as a Latin noun, used in the phrase in specie: In kind
In order for speciation to be considered a different kind of specie , this miracle must be at the family level or higher in biological taxonomy.
The evolutionist will always disallow abiogenesis as a precursor to biological evolution as it destroys their belief system.
Please answer the following. Characterize the chemical and electrical processes which created the first self-replicating cell.
Please characterize the chemical, electrical and biological processes which started biological evolution.
Please characterize the biological and chemical and electric properties which created the human mind.
Time is the enemy of biology any undergraduate in biology could verify that from one hour to two weeks destroy biological experiments.
This following is a chemical characterization to alter a cell wall which contains 40.000 different type of lipids. This is an excerpt from a 175 page characterization.
Episulfide 37. To an oven dried three-neck round bottom flask charged with hydrazone 33(.099g, 4.7 mmol) and MgSO4 0.49 g. 50% w/w was added dichloromethane (25mL). To this suspension was added quickly MnO2 (1.26 g. 18 mmol, Sigma-Aldrich>90%) bath ranging from at ca. -5 °C to -10 °C for 1.5h. After this period, the reaction mixture was cooled to -50 °C and then transferred to a Schlenk filtration tube connect to an oven dried three-neck round bottom flask . The deep-purple filtrate that contained intermediate 36 was collected, and the Schlenk tube was rinsed with pre-cooled dicholoromethane (20 ml, -50 °C). To the flask containing the combined filtrate, thione 35 (0.97 g, 2.5 mmol) was added portionwise until no more N2 evolved. The mixture was stirred for an additional 0.5 h at ambient temperature. The mixture was poured into methonal (80 mL) with vigorous stirring and white precipitate formed. The solid was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with methanol (30 mL) under vacuum to afford the desired 37 (1.19 g, 84%).
Use any source in the universe to reply. If you conclude that the answer to the above questions is "these are not possible" then you would be correct.
so..... let me get this straight ... the "flood" sorted the layers so that the gravel is at the bottom then silt then clay ... so how comes he says that where he lives it goes "Gravel sand clay gravel sand clay......" etc... how many "floods" were there?
Not only that, he also contradicts himself when he said the flood hydrologically sorts things but then turns around and says a flood mixes things up.
Hovind frequently cites Noah's Flood, yet provides NO scientific evidence that the Flood ever happened.
I’m disappointed that the debaters allowed Kent to keep repeating his pathetic mantra interminably
Every time Kent tells a lie he has to clear his throat. LOL
Kent is not telling anything, he is asking for proof for the claims aj making.
Kent is not telling anything, he is asking for proof for the claims aj making.
@@bernardlongwe7330 Kent Strawmans the claims of evolution persistently. Strawmanning is misrepresenting an opponent's position. Kent has been corrected on his strawmanning over and over and over. Hence, if he misrepresents the claim after being corrected he's knowingly lying. That's one of DOZENS of examples. Even if one were to be charitable and say he's not lying, his default position is one vof intellectual dishonesty, given he ignores any information that counters his c arguments. He's weaseley, dodgey, and dishonest, and that's blatant.
This is how you slam dunk an atheist😂
I’m KIDDING RELAXXXX 😂😂😂😂
I hope all is well for you and I can’t wait for us to talk again! You’ve been kinder to my friends than anyone and I just wanted to lift you up and say hi! Anyways rock n roll!
ah, but you guys made a mistake, he's not a doctor
So 4 bucks plus 5 bucks equals 10 bucks to Hovind! 😂
I like how do you pretty much destroyed kent and for the very first time I’m on standing for truth, and I appreciate AJ for helping me
Huh?
Millions of years never happened. Can't have fossilized tracks preceding the actual animals by millions of years. They were trying to escape a flood. A worldwide flood.
How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed.
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs There's not enough water on the planet for there to even be a worldwide flood. It literally cannot happen, and it never did.
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs actually, it did happen everything started out as a single bacteria, cell organism no matter if you like it or not
@@tyrannotherium7873
Actually, millions of years never happened.
Can't have fossilized tracks in strata millions of years before strata in which the actual animals appeared. Oops.
“Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains:
“This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.”
Dr. Marcus Ross
Phd paleontologist
@@tyrannotherium7873 then why can't they recreate it....
Has $4 and wants to bet $10 so needs to borrow $5 ????
Kent described the tides incorrectly! Science Gent? Plonker! 😂
Absolute respect AJ.
I do have degrees in Earth science and I couldn't face Kent's lying hypocrisy without losing it.
Where is the evolution? What a lying fraud you.
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
@@JimmyTony-uu2xsGo cry elsewhere or bring some proof for a change.
@@woutermortier2771
How do you get fossilized tracks in strata, millions of years before the strata in which the actual animals appeared LOL?
“Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains:
“This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.”
Dr. Marcus Ross
Phd paleontologist
Kent is the personification of Argument from Ignorance.
If the flood can mess up where all the species are found, why are humans only in the top layers?
"And the word kind has no definition." One for the home team.
What are you talking about? A KIND of animal that lays eggs, has feathers and a beak is a bird. KIND works just fine.
@@edgein8632 it works for general kinds like birds but doesn't do well when we get to specific species. like duck, eagle, or ostrich. all are birds but cant mix breed and are drink enough physically and genetically to be their own thing.
@@Orsonfoe A Porche is a kind of car, a Pine tree is a kind of tree, a finch is a kind of bird, a lion is a kind of cat. Kind works just fine.
@@edgein8632 nope. again people use it for general things but it is false apart when you get into specifics. less so since the bible and kent never properly define the word and science is all about being precise and clear as possible.
@@Orsonfoe The word was never meant to be scientific flunky, it’s a descriptive word used to simplify a sentence. Grow up.
I’m not sure I’ve ever seen Ken get destroyed this bad. Great job holding his feet to the fire AJ
Destroyed? Man, you must be a missing link.
@@davidluciano9478 Idk what debate you watched but AJ broke his brain more than the last mini stroke did.
After a long boring read I did, that mosquito is a huge nothing burger so ??/
Kent vs Conspiracy Cats was awesome. "I'm not prepared for that".
Erika vs Kent was also good
@@xforbiddenone “Housekeeping genes…? I’m not prepared for that”
Kent agrees the mosquitos are different kinds at 15:25ish when he says "if they are capable of bringing forth, aka having babies, they're the same kind"
Edit: still watching, AJ points this out though
I must be deaf, I’m missing the part where the atheist makes any point at all.
Has anyone ever directly called Kent out for believing we came from dust while laughing about the fake “we came from a rock” belief?
Life from clay by intelligent design or life from rocks out of nowhere from nothing, with 0 evidence, complete with gigabytes of 4 digit, 4 dimensional genetic code?
We are Jewish mud golems animated by Jewish mud magic apparently
ARE YOU KIDDING ME CHRISTIANS? NEXT THING CHRISTIANS WILL SAY " SNAKES AND DONKEYS CAN TALK!
They will deflect and say it was serpents 💁♂️ Both are sneaky little bastards
Our favorite atheist and our favorite swindler... this combo will never get old!
Quit brainwashing little kids into believing there is no God with your half-breed apemen millions of years fairy tale garbage.
Millions of years never happened.
"It’s a pattern in the fossil record that footprints are found in strata millions of years before foot bones, and evolutionists never explain how the critter survived millions of years after leaving its footprints until it finally got buried."
"It was first presented in detail in a paper by Adventist Leonard Brand and a co-author J. Florence in 1982. The evolutionists have never answered this challenge in the 38 years since. The pattern is the same for reptiles, amphibians, dinosaurs, birds, and mammals."
"How many years are we talking about? 10 million between trilobite tracks and trilobite fossils; 35 million between amphibian tracks and amphibian fossils; and 10 million between dinosaur tracks and dinosaur fossils. That is a curious pattern indeed."
Someone should ask Kent to which kind tadpoles belong - fish or frog? And at which stage of metamorphosis they switch from one kind to another? When they lose gills, or when they grow legs and lungs?
Easy. All that matters is the adult stage. Nice try
@@edgein8632but if you find the fossil of a tadpole, how could you prove it would change into something else? It's just "bones in the dirt", bones in the dirt don't change.
Metamorphosis variation within existing genetic code.
Show me a tuna which is growing legs LOL.
Where's the "considerable developmental repattering" to fill the "large morphological gap" between fins and feet? Oops.
“There remains a large morphological gap between them and digits as seen in, for example, Acanthostega: if the digits evolved from these distal bones, the process must have involved considerable developmental repatterning..” (Clack & Ahlberg, Nature 440:748
@@JimmyTony-uu2xs Tunas don't grow legs. But there are fish who seem to be evolving their fins into appendages functioning like legs. It's an example of convergent evolution.
@@FrikInCasualMode And yet they never actually change.