Overpriced wingers destroyed fullbacks, no small team will bother to bring the kids up for the position when it is easier to halfass a winger and get more money, it is the business people, not the evolution of the sport
The problem is also the lack of number 9 header masters, that's why a lot of teams stopped crossing and opted for inverted full back or wings. Back in the day you had Drogba or Van Nisterooy for example, now those kind of players disappeared, only exception being Haaland who doesn't receive cross either. A.C. Milan is still playing with the full back with Theo Hernandez who has great speed and attacking ability. The only way to get full backs is adapting wingers in that are by working on their defensive abilities... Zinchenko wasn't even a fullback to begin with.
I dont think a old school target man would effect the role of the Fullback all that much. As previously teams used Fullbacks/Wingbacks to keep the width in the team when in possesion. Now they opt more often to use their Wingers to keep the width instead of centralizing them too much.
@@lir4e even so it's just a lower probability. The ball takes longer to get in so defenders have time to get into position. The same way that shots from outside the box have reduced significantly.
I think it has to do with multiple factors that were mentioned: 1.Takes longer to track back. 2. Teams aren't built around crossing, so having 2 wide players attacking the byline is not needed. 3. Wingers today are expected to somehow both invert and cross from wide depending on circumstance. Not quite realistic, but "two footed" gets thrown around for forwards like it's a norm. 4. The 4-3-3 hasn't completely went out of fashion. If the winger decides to come inside, the midfielder is much closer to overlap him than the fullback who has to either be dangerously high, or read 10 seconds into the future. 5. Underlapping runs and attacking the half spaces is considered much more valuable. A winger and a midfielder don't necessarily need the fullback to pull that off. I think the way modern football focuses on crowding the midfield both for offense and defense, the need for wingers and fullbacks that both go high and wide will comeback. More teams will find themselves unable to stop wide play when outnumbered wide with their packed midfield getting played around and forced to run diagonally side to side as it becomes impossible to stay both centrally compact and make it in time to the other side consistently.
The reduction on wide high crosses are a factor. By the time the full back advanced to the wing defenders are in position. And high long crosses are far easier to defend. Using the winger for width the ball is likely to get to the winger quicker giving more opportunity. Andy Robertson in Klopps first team got to the by-line successfully had high assists. But that system used a workhorse midfield to cover. But theyd Firmino and Trent who are expectational playmakers to compensate.
Kompanys tactics are ridiculously great. He’s playing a 2-3-4-1 on offense. If Bayern can get TAA, that would make them insanely great. And then they are looking to add Wirtz. OMG
This is what ten hag meant when he said he wants utd to be the best transition team in the world but people misunderstood it to be just gang hoo counter attacking, but he meant defensive transition when we loose the ball and attacking transition when we have it
Weren’t full back (originally called half backs) formed because of the 235 system the two wider midfielders dropping into the full back areas we know now, the to onside forwards became cm creating the 433
The initial half backs became the modern center backs. The full backs were always fully back, and were the de facto original center backs. But by dropping the half backs in the center back roles, the full backs were pushed to the wide areas.
In my non professional career (Sunday league mate) I have played LB RB CB and CDM 😰 I played striker once, and although I was rubbish (still am) i managed to scored
I guess the true origin of the term fullback in English has to do with shirt numbers. When they were introduced there were usually two defenders assigned numbers 2 and 3 known as full backs. Then when formations developed as you presented those numbers moved outwards in England (and the number 5 moved down to the defensive line). But in English they kept referring to those shirt numbers as full backs, and to the no 5 as centre half. The interesting thing is why fullback and centre half stuck as terms in English and why they followed the shirt number rather than the position. In many other languages new terms was invented for the new kinds of positions and roles. Like 'laterais' in Brazil. In my old Pro Evolution Soccer I think the position was labeled SB or side back, which is much better, but I don't make the rules for your language 😄
Overpriced wingers destroyed fullbacks, no small team will bother to bring the kids up for the position when it is easier to halfass a winger and get more money, it is the business people, not the evolution of the sport
Recently, Pep makes Lewis as metronom-hybrid full back in 3-1-5-1, more fluid & could cover single pivot (Kovacic/Rodri).🔥🔥🔥
The problem is also the lack of number 9 header masters, that's why a lot of teams stopped crossing and opted for inverted full back or wings. Back in the day you had Drogba or Van Nisterooy for example, now those kind of players disappeared, only exception being Haaland who doesn't receive cross either.
A.C. Milan is still playing with the full back with Theo Hernandez who has great speed and attacking ability.
The only way to get full backs is adapting wingers in that are by working on their defensive abilities... Zinchenko wasn't even a fullback to begin with.
I dont think a old school target man would effect the role of the Fullback all that much. As previously teams used Fullbacks/Wingbacks to keep the width in the team when in possesion. Now they opt more often to use their Wingers to keep the width instead of centralizing them too much.
Haaland is not really at header when compared with traditional 9.
@@lir4e even so it's just a lower probability. The ball takes longer to get in so defenders have time to get into position. The same way that shots from outside the box have reduced significantly.
I think it has to do with multiple factors that were mentioned:
1.Takes longer to track back.
2. Teams aren't built around crossing, so having 2 wide players attacking the byline is not needed.
3. Wingers today are expected to somehow both invert and cross from wide depending on circumstance. Not quite realistic, but "two footed" gets thrown around for forwards like it's a norm.
4. The 4-3-3 hasn't completely went out of fashion. If the winger decides to come inside, the midfielder is much closer to overlap him than the fullback who has to either be dangerously high, or read 10 seconds into the future.
5. Underlapping runs and attacking the half spaces is considered much more valuable. A winger and a midfielder don't necessarily need the fullback to pull that off.
I think the way modern football focuses on crowding the midfield both for offense and defense, the need for wingers and fullbacks that both go high and wide will comeback. More teams will find themselves unable to stop wide play when outnumbered wide with their packed midfield getting played around and forced to run diagonally side to side as it becomes impossible to stay both centrally compact and make it in time to the other side consistently.
The reduction on wide high crosses are a factor. By the time the full back advanced to the wing defenders are in position. And high long crosses are far easier to defend. Using the winger for width the ball is likely to get to the winger quicker giving more opportunity.
Andy Robertson in Klopps first team got to the by-line successfully had high assists. But that system used a workhorse midfield to cover. But theyd Firmino and Trent who are expectational playmakers to compensate.
Bro you help me alot in football understanding.
Thanks
Kompanys tactics are ridiculously great. He’s playing a 2-3-4-1 on offense. If Bayern can get TAA, that would make them insanely great. And then they are looking to add Wirtz. OMG
I hope I can apply this to my tactics in Football Manager
Of course you can.
This is what ten hag meant when he said he wants utd to be the best transition team in the world but people misunderstood it to be just gang hoo counter attacking, but he meant defensive transition when we loose the ball and attacking transition when we have it
Trying to explain tactics to English fans and journalists are a waste of time😅
Weren’t full back (originally called half backs) formed because of the 235 system the two wider midfielders dropping into the full back areas we know now, the to onside forwards became cm creating the 433
The initial half backs became the modern center backs. The full backs were always fully back, and were the de facto original center backs. But by dropping the half backs in the center back roles, the full backs were pushed to the wide areas.
Which Programm you use?? Plss
I use canva.com
@@ThinkingAboutFootball thank you so much
I must say for a 10 minutes video I learned nothing new ☹️
😂
Learm science, or history then
Please do a video about kompany at bayern - because he does that also
4 - 3 - 2 - 1
Offensive Keeper
Complete Wing Back - Libero - Libero - Complete Wing Back
Roaming Playmaker - Roaming Playmaker - Roaming Playmaker
Shadow Striker - Shadow Striker
Complete Forward
4 - 2 - 3 - 1
Outside Keeper
Complete Wing Back - Libero - Libero - Complete Wing Back
Roaming Playmaker - Box-To-Box
Mezzala - Shadow Striker - Mezzala
Complete Forward
Use F9 for more chaos.
Are the liberos attack or defence?
@@nzubeokafor6692Attack
@@nzubeokafor6692ATTACK
Brian clough used inverted fullback with Stuart pearce 1990 to 1993
In my non professional career (Sunday league mate) I have played LB RB CB and CDM 😰 I played striker once, and although I was rubbish (still am) i managed to scored
dude how is this related to the video
I guess the true origin of the term fullback in English has to do with shirt numbers. When they were introduced there were usually two defenders assigned numbers 2 and 3 known as full backs. Then when formations developed as you presented those numbers moved outwards in England (and the number 5 moved down to the defensive line). But in English they kept referring to those shirt numbers as full backs, and to the no 5 as centre half.
The interesting thing is why fullback and centre half stuck as terms in English and why they followed the shirt number rather than the position. In many other languages new terms was invented for the new kinds of positions and roles. Like 'laterais' in Brazil.
In my old Pro Evolution Soccer I think the position was labeled SB or side back, which is much better, but I don't make the rules for your language 😄
By defensive balance you mean “Rest Defence”
Correct, my friend.
If teams used wingers theyd need full-backs.
Who the hell is Sag-na? San-ia is the pronunciation
It smells chatgpt in this video
This channel copies several videos from Centro do jogo
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣