The 392 Rubicon.. BEST Jeep EVER! But here's the Problem!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2022
  • I give you my thoughts on just how amazing the Jeep Rubicon 392 is and why I feel like it's the best Jeep every made; however, it might be too good. I give you my thoughts on price, availability, and if there's really a market for it. Would you pay over 90k for a Rubicon?
    Special Thanks to:
    Hopper Motorplex
    900 N. Central Expy
    McKinney, TX 75070
    (214)544-0102
    hoppermotorplex.com/
    Interested in donating to the channel? Here's where you can do that!
    cash.me/$RacerXOfficial
    Instagram - #RacerXOfficial
    / racerxofficial
    Don't forget to Like, Subscribe, and Share - RacerX
    Shot on the IPhone XR
    Thank you for your support on the channel
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 310

  • @mini2nut67
    @mini2nut67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    A fairly loaded 3.6L V6 Wrangler stickers for around $65k. Another $13k gets you the 392 engine, Fox suspension, larger brakes, steel knuckles, CV joints, beefed up transmission, 392 exclusive leather seats, all of the safety groups, re-engineered ladder frame, etc. What owners are REALLY paying for is the exclusively, resale value and the satisfying V8 rumble that puts a smile on every owners face when pushing on the fun pedal.

    • @doloressalgado3427
      @doloressalgado3427 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Finally a smart person everything is expensive doesn't matter what car you have but most people online talk crap can't afford them still live with mom and dad

    • @doloressalgado3427
      @doloressalgado3427 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What happened to your wife she could drive and had a great smile

    • @rideintothesun8106
      @rideintothesun8106 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You can get a decently optioned Jeep Sahara with turbo 4 for low 40s. Swap that out for 5.7 hemi and your under 50, 000. The 5.7 is more than enough power for a Jeep.

    • @joshreynolds729
      @joshreynolds729 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@doloressalgado3427 65k for anything that’s heavy and comes with 285 hp and no update in power since 2012 when it came out is not worth the money. And I payed way more for my hellcat than that and support myself in my own house happily married. When these should have never even been made with the 3.6 to begin with.

    • @ChrisH421
      @ChrisH421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@rideintothesun8106 what are you talking about a base Sahara starts at $43.5k once you add a couple of options your in the high 40s. When you do your hemi swap you're going to have to replace the transmission to since niethier the manual or auto was designed to handle a v8,and then you'd still be missing all the axle, brake, suspension, and more upgrades.

  • @ENCAGED79
    @ENCAGED79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Just seeing the 392 Rubicon puts a huge smile on my face.I love the concept. Kudos to Mopar for pulling this off. To be honest, I would rather buy an older Jeep and drop a 392 crate motor in it.

  • @redtitan29
    @redtitan29 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I have bought one and Im currently waiting for another to be built. Keep in mind that many Jeep owners add lifts, 37"-40" tires, heavy armor, bumpers, and winches. The power of the 392 laughs at the added weight while the V6 becomes even more of a dog that it already is, even with deeper gears. Jeep was also smart by making the Rubicon 392 full time 4WD which helps to efficiently put all the power to the ground. The Hellcat Rubicon you drove was 2WD which allowed the power to over power the chassis.

    • @RacerX9
      @RacerX9  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Definitely an interesting perspective.. if you added all those things then I could definitely justify the 6.4..

    • @DefinitelyNotYouThankGod
      @DefinitelyNotYouThankGod 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I have a 2021 with the 3.6 and it has plenty of power! I was very impressed to be truthful. I know the older ones were Royal turds 💩!!

    • @joshreynolds729
      @joshreynolds729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DefinitelyNotYouThankGod they been using the 3.6 since 2012 with the same pentistar output 285crank hp and 260 tq as the 2021. I’m pretty sure the only thing changed was gearing and trans therefore it’s always been a slow 💩 and slow in comparison to any v8. Also over priced. Never understood the following. Only one I like is the track hawk for apparent reason. 392 is s the way they needed to come the whole time as a base for cheaper.

    • @FATmenDRIVEtrucks
      @FATmenDRIVEtrucks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gravity is still real no matter what engine you drop in

    • @jeepchronicles5644
      @jeepchronicles5644 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshreynolds729 the 8-spd made the biggest to the feel of 3.6l. My 6spd manual still sucks lol

  • @sheaallen7839
    @sheaallen7839 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I absolutely LOVE my Rubicon 392. But definitely a niche vehicle. I thought about the TRX, but in the end kept my Denali HD diesel and purchased the 392 for play. I smile every time I get in it and floor it!

  • @The_Draque
    @The_Draque 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The price is too goddamn high for these

    • @corradoparris9679
      @corradoparris9679 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There going to price themselves out of business.

    • @1titans
      @1titans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@corradoparris9679 but they aren’t. People are ordering them all the time

    • @scottleggejr
      @scottleggejr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@1titansno they aren't. The demand is limited production not demand. They don't make enough of these to keep the price high

  • @beehive141
    @beehive141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I bought one and I'll tell anybody to get it also. The jeep is the best vehicle right now it's amazing !!

  • @KEN-du2iz
    @KEN-du2iz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Agree 5.7 should be a option. Biggest down side for me is the fact you have to buy the best version to get that engine. 2nd down side is 90k is hellcat engine level. So it would be a hard no at that price point.
    Would love to see a 5.7 at least in the Gladiator. When lifting these vehicles it's such a drag to see how much effort the engine has go through with the V6 even with gears. Honestly need all the help they can get.

    • @scottleggejr
      @scottleggejr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never made any sense 🙄

  • @WoolfJ35
    @WoolfJ35 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I'm usually all for the Heminsanity but a 5.7 would have been perfect and if that's where Jeep is going to go with it cool but a 6.4 in a Wrangler isn't going to make much sense for anyone largely due to the price, because after markups you could just get a TRX or Jailbreak.

    • @ryanarchibald2907
      @ryanarchibald2907 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wrangler is so much more practical than either of those.
      You can’t drive the jailbreak around me year round. The trx is just too damn big

    • @fitfogey
      @fitfogey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah but the TRX also has a truck bed. The Rubicon obviously does not. That’s huge for a lot of people.

    • @SangermanSwag
      @SangermanSwag 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You’re gonna pay a mark up on both the TRX and the Jail Break

    • @MrRjezonie
      @MrRjezonie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got mine at MSRP no markup. Hell I’m ready for more power so getting a tune soon. 4.88s tomorrow! On 37s now. Would hate it in a weak 5.7.

    • @WoolfJ35
      @WoolfJ35 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrRjezonie hey if you got at MSRP than props to you, and for your setup the 6.4 makes total sense lol. That setup sounds like it's going to be sick

  • @knarfluna
    @knarfluna 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great Jeep. Great options …what gets me is that you always say would you spend this cash for this Jeep if you’re not in a mountainous region. Or in the sticks.
    But what I say is….born and raised in Chicago …with hot summers, which the roof is perfect for…and tough tough winters..which the 4x4 is perfect for…why wouldn’t it be right for the upper Midwest in the burbs?
    This area has the worst streets…with pavement buckles, potholes, uneven surfaces. I gave up owning a car in Chicago…the suspension gets torn to shreds…you need a vehicle like this to handle these ‘off-road’ like conditions even though you’re not in the woods.
    I feel you guys miss the connection and should stress that more…I don’t need to off-road…but if you’re in Chicago, Jersey,New York, Boston. These have got to be the best option to handle the urban terrain…which can be just as deadly as the trails…believe it or not…great stuff X

  • @j.r.777
    @j.r.777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I ordered my first Jeep ever at the end of November in 2020. I ordered a 2021 JL Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon. I ordered mine with the 3.6 liter V-6 w/ eTorque. About 2 weeks after I ordered my Jeep the 392 was announced. I was so freaking bummed. And then the Extreme Recon package was also announced too. Had I known those things I would have waited a few months and ordered a 392 with an Extreme Recon package. But oh well. Other than the eTorque, I love almost everything about my Jeep. It is definitely the most capable off road vehicle that I have ever owned. I do need to buy another truck though after I pay off my Jeep because I used the heck out of my trucks in the past. But that’s still another 2 to 3 years away.

  • @boldrbangr9834
    @boldrbangr9834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It makes sense to me. A similarly equipped V6 Rubicon is over $60,000. Those who calculated the cost of a used (not new) 392 & trans + needed parts at $4-5000 are way underestimating all the costs needed to make the swap. I think you'd be way closer to $10,000 if you do all of the work yourself & end up with a used drive train. Maybe you could recoup a little by selling the old drive train. Having professionals do the new 392 swap will add $35,000 - $40,000, so you're right where the factory 392 cost (or more) with no factory warranty, etc. To me, buying a new factory 392 is a no brainer.

  • @ca7889
    @ca7889 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I appreciate your content-I like to hear the different views on the 392, brings me to reality that I don't even want it-the cabin is the same as all other wranglers, despise leather so wouldn't have that either and I'm really a speednut but I can get that in my challenger. I know this is for some folks, have yet to really see one on a trail or even someone that really likes it other than you tube. But anyone that happens to be Speed Racers brother I'm listening.

  • @rockyp544
    @rockyp544 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Agreed on a specific type of person. I find myself putting seat covers on after the gym lol. I have a work truck so it’s my weekend vehicle. Hell I don’t even eat in it. I’d say maybe as I see some wear & tear, then I’ll gradually lay off the OCD mindset. But I’d your a hard working person that you know this is what you deserve and it makes you feel good, the price isn’t bad. Especially these days. I love it. ✌️

  • @toddwatkins9666
    @toddwatkins9666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I LOVE that vehicle!!! When I first saw they were making that and video I said I wanted one!!! But me living in the Northeast I STILL can’t fathom paying like 90 racks for something that doesn’t have a Hellcat on the side of it… I think I may wait and get a pre-owned one at the end of next year as my retirement gift for myself 😂😂

  • @LamontBoucherville
    @LamontBoucherville 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The 392 wrangler is the best Dodge Product in my opinion. Power of a muscle car and utility of an suv

    • @gmobb4773
      @gmobb4773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Hardly an suv.

    • @WoolfJ35
      @WoolfJ35 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      SRT Durango ,Grand Cherokee, and the Hellcat Durango and Trackhawk all existed for awhile now lol

    • @mini2nut67
      @mini2nut67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The 6.4L engine in a small Wrangler was Jeeps way of giving the middle finger to the world. It makes no practical sense but I’m glad they made it. Jeep leadership still has a sense of humor, every other legacy manufacturer leader would have laughed this idea out of the office.

    • @joshreynolds729
      @joshreynolds729 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah I disagree when the hellcat motor comes in other platforms. Jeeps to me have always been overrated and to damn expensive even if it comes with a v6 and they still want 60k when it’s worth 20-40. Then they put the 392 in it that’s being phased out for a reason for way more when a scat can be had for less with less weight. If your going to spend the money I would just get the Durango hellcat, track hawk, or trx. Not saying it’s not nice just to expensive and hard to find for what it is to be middle of the tracks in the upper segment of payments. And dodge always acts like they are lambos when you try to look at them or they just don’t help you. I wanted an suv for my wife but all the Big 3 dealers don’t want to help you and if they do then no deals are given at all or they don’t want to let you test drive them. Shit I’ve even driven up in a hellcat and barely got help. I now understand why people buy Hondas. they actually help you and they are cheaper on fuel, lighter, plus last unlike dodge products. And with gas prices the way they are and all dodge products being heavy sales will go down.

    • @gmobb4773
      @gmobb4773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshreynolds729 you just a karen

  • @KC27386
    @KC27386 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Not sure what this guy is talking about. I bought mine a week ago and drove it 300 miles home through the Smokey mountains and it handled like a dream. The paddle shifters are awesome and I didn’t have any issues.
    I pretty sure this was the same guy that said the TRX was sketchy to drive, that’s my daily driver…so to each his own.

  • @nickkostakis9600
    @nickkostakis9600 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great show mate and a good job explaining everything about the car good on you

  • @mikecarter9080
    @mikecarter9080 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've owned my 2006 Jeep TJ Wrangler Rubicon since new. I've ordered my 2024 Jeep 392 Rubicon and can't wait for it to arrive!

  • @av8orAH64
    @av8orAH64 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought the 392 XR and absolutely love this thing. If this is a niche vehicle then I must be the target demographic. It has all the chops found on the standard Rubicon but bonus...it screams. What other vehicle can you go anywhere and enjoy front and rear locking diffs, swaybar disconnect, nice appointments, lifted from the OEM with 35s, bead-lock capable bronze wheels, a beefed up chassis, and a 6.4 Hemi that takes you from 0-60 in 4.2 with 4.56 gears. WOW! So whether you roll on the streets, or in the bush this is one capable and insanely fun vehicle. I hear that it has a stereo. I would not know because I keep the One-Touch top open to listen to the Glorius exhaust notes coming from the back. Thanks, Jeep!

  • @Unc0mmonSense
    @Unc0mmonSense 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am picking up my 392XR on Friday. It is like Jeeps version of a G Wagon imho. I always liked Jeeps but never bought one because they lacked power and some other features I wanted in a daily driver. Now I can get a great utilitarian vehicle with off road styling AND power. It has just enough luxury, like heated seats/steering wheel and ACC, but still bare bones enough so i can hose it out. Everything I want in an SUV.
    Yeah, it is a little pricey but I think it is worth it. You can barely find one under $100k on a lot. They haven't made a lot of them and you can no longer even order one for '22. '23 will likely be last year of the 392 (replaced by the HO Hurricaine).
    It is a special car.

  • @mickeywilson7998
    @mickeywilson7998 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    .As always another great review RacerX

  • @gingerthetrailpup7223
    @gingerthetrailpup7223 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Honestly, I have always been a Trailhawk fan … but wanting to upgrade to a V8 / hemp and as of 2023, they are going electric 😳 on the Trailhawk … so here I am checking out the Rubicon … and not disappointed.

  • @michaeldawson4087
    @michaeldawson4087 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Buying a 392 is a no-brainer choice. The resale value on used 392's are going higher than the markup on new ones. Jeep has cut off all 392 orders atm no one knows if they will open for MY23. Prices for existing new and used are going through the roof. Mine sits in my garage, it's going to be kept stock and low miles and no offroading. I have other jeeps to wheel and drive...the 392 is special and will be one of rare jeeps and why I bought it.

    • @1titans
      @1titans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Funny you say that. I have on order with no markup but, the dealer had one on the lot somebody returned with 400 miles on it. Those are the ones being marked up, which they did. And they will resale very high because of the rarity factor. Unfortunately, I don’t have the discipline and will drive it into the ground.

  • @ixibladeixi2639
    @ixibladeixi2639 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video . No thanks for 5.7. Finally pulled the trigger. I just ordered 2023 392XR. Can't wait. We gotta pay to play.

  • @nathansummerville3972
    @nathansummerville3972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love that Jeep built it! I hate that they priced it so high. What I really want is a mini TRX with the 392 for about $60k.

    • @princesstee3818
      @princesstee3818 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anything Mopar is going to be double priced sadly

    • @tallballer09
      @tallballer09 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Beggars can’t be choosers.

  • @chadpittman7826
    @chadpittman7826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome content buddy 👍💪

  • @adventurelifewithbob2960
    @adventurelifewithbob2960 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved the video. Off-roading and Jeeps are the best!

  • @nazarethperez9760
    @nazarethperez9760 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That thing rips. It rumbles perfectly. Fast too

  • @platec4798
    @platec4798 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just wish the interior was more bare bones and utilitarian. I don't drive a Jeep because I want it to be like a Cadillac Escalade. I drive a Jeep because I like the utilitarianism aspect.
    Plate C

  • @rayrussell6064
    @rayrussell6064 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't own any jeep product or have the wants for one but I think they would have been better off if they stuffed a 5.7 in it due to gas prices fuel mileage and insurance purposes I agree they needed a v8 but at almost 100k I could justify one if I was to buy at a 100k it would be a trx just makes more sense to me I don't rock crawl and the use of a pick up I do have. Awesome content RACER-X and as always be safe 👍

  • @budzlightyear2212
    @budzlightyear2212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With 4doors and epic Jeep capabilities matched w/a 392.
    This has got to be the best Jeep ever made.
    Would love to hear this beast on a hill climb or rock 🪨 crawling...

  • @mattskillman
    @mattskillman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One thing you didn't touch on was the fuel demands of the Rubicon 392. Obviously with the lower MPG because of the 6.4L, you're going to burn through a lot of what that 392 requires, and that's Premium grade fuel. As much as I wanted a 392 when they came out, I had a feeling that fuel prices were going to increase eventually, and being that you have to put Premium fuel in the tank, that was the deal breaker for me. Had they gone with a 5.7 like in my Ram Rebel, that would have been easier on MPG and fuel costs. When they start dropped the I6 Hurricane in these, that'll be a game changer.

  • @stevedolan5065
    @stevedolan5065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    My Dad had a CJ-5 back in the 60’s…indeed we cleaned it out with a hose. If I recall correctly it had a 4 banger. Not much power, but it was geared so low we could go up and down really steep grades easily. It just kinda slowly pulled you up those steep hills. It was reliable and built to withstand just about anything. But driving on the street was very much like torture. This thing you just tested looks like it would be a real hoot to drive both on and off road, but I don’t think you could really put that much power to use off road unless you were in some kind of desert race. I like Rubicons and I love Hemis…but unless I hit the lotto I don’t think this would be great investment. Just my $.02. I enjoyed the video and your insight.

  • @jonluchessi1643
    @jonluchessi1643 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes I would spend 97,000 on a Rubicon 392, I’m jeep guy and I think it’s the perfect Jeep and within about a week I’m just deciding on which color to get I’m ordering one,, thanks for the video buddy👍

  • @MrLew1965
    @MrLew1965 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ok!! I seen one at a dealership up here in Toronto, Canada for $138K + %13 Tax...COME ON !! $150K over the curb ?? Are we on earth here ?/

  • @justpray365
    @justpray365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Jeep would have sold a bazillion 5.7l Jeeps.

    • @RacerX9
      @RacerX9  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Probably so 👍

    • @Chief_5
      @Chief_5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And then we could’ve supercharged them!

    • @bobforpples
      @bobforpples 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not the way they’re pricing other jeeps

  • @adam_gonzz
    @adam_gonzz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still want one. I’ll have to trade my Rubicon 21 for the 392. Hearing the power on it will be awesome.

  • @ZACKSONFIRE
    @ZACKSONFIRE 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the barebones look of my JK; less to be ruined. It has AC, power windows, and only 200 or so horsepowers haha (and half of that with the AC on). 0-60 in about a minute but my steel bumper helps manage traffic flow just fine.

  • @Alteris85
    @Alteris85 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of these 392 Jeeps came to the shop I work at yesterday. I didn't believe it had a 392 in it because there's a fake one riding around with the 3.6 just with 392 badges and the hood on it.

  • @a.common.American
    @a.common.American 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Freaking zero regrets I absolutely LOVE my 24 392. OffRoad+ turns it into a whole different street beast with pops and burbles

  • @williamserver4332
    @williamserver4332 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not a truck/jeep guy but this one is cool. Just because of the engine

  • @Mustang69GTR
    @Mustang69GTR 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want one!🔥🔥🔥🔥 that’s why I didn’t get a wrangler cuz they didn’t have a v8 version and ended up getting a 2008 Jeep srt8

  • @leemen
    @leemen ปีที่แล้ว

    The 392 is the most bang for the buck rubicon you can order. 392 package comes with so much more then just the engine. And on 40 inch tires and Dana 60s with a 4.88 gear I average 15.5 mpg. Worth ever penny!!

  • @jeepin123
    @jeepin123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I looked for months and went into the dealership in person to negotiate. Being pre approved and on the lot in person adds to that negotiation power. The msrp on mine was 85,600 i paid 82,000 for a new 2022 with the recon package.

    • @ixT0PSH0TZxi
      @ixT0PSH0TZxi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gotta throw some content on that bad boy. You paid a pretty penny for it, why not show some cool content for it?

    • @ixT0PSH0TZxi
      @ixT0PSH0TZxi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @That V8 Life I’d hope there’s a video. Kickass cars you got btw 👍🏼 The SS caught my eye the most, badass Bronco you got tho 🤝

  • @peterspakosky9647
    @peterspakosky9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am a Jeep lover and rock crawler and I would definitely rock crawl this monster.

  • @MBailey1977
    @MBailey1977 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think more would sell with a 5.7 which is plenty of power. Also never understood why people complain about the interior of a Jeep? It's meant to go off road and have fun. Cars are made for nice interiors!

    • @hubriswonk
      @hubriswonk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right! My jeep has 4.5 lift with 35, cloth top no windows and I cannot even recall the last time I checked to see if the AC works!

  • @rickmulcahy6279
    @rickmulcahy6279 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You never got around to what you said you were going to do... which was talking about the things that jeep Finally corrected on this on this Jeep

  • @asdf51501
    @asdf51501 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I absolutely love it, but don't think it's quite worth the price. Do I want one? Yep! Will I buy one? Probably not.

  • @roymorgan5498
    @roymorgan5498 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wouldn't buy one but I love the 393 in my skat pack killerBee. Nice video there Racer X.

    • @RacerX9
      @RacerX9  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks buddy 👍

  • @chadhanson4369
    @chadhanson4369 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Got my order on a 392 it will be the most fun car ever made

  • @danramirez4290
    @danramirez4290 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am debating between the 392 Jeep and a pickup- tough decision in that neither are cheap.

  • @308loneeagle7
    @308loneeagle7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems nowadays it’s hard to even find a 5.7 Grand Cherokee. In ‘13 the dealer had both the 3.6 and 5.7 lined up for a test drive. Did the 5.7 first and had no interest in even trying the V6 after that. I think a 5.7 in a Wrangler would have been just perfect (but not for me @ 6’7” and 280lbs I wouldn’t know how to fold me into the driver seat). Currently drive a RAM… would have loved the 392 option without having to go straight to TRX. That said, considering the money I’ve thrown at it so far and I’m not even done, I could and should have had a TRX (got my ‘19 Laramie dec ‘18).

  • @sstevocamaro
    @sstevocamaro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    A 5.7 Hemi would have been cheaper and more practical imo.

    • @R3vokenDallout1on
      @R3vokenDallout1on 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      i been sayin this since the 392 dropped

    • @mini2nut67
      @mini2nut67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jeep leadership wanted the V8 Wrangler to go out with a bang, hence the 6.4L engine. 2023 will most likely be the last year it is offered before it goes the way of the Do Do bird.

    • @MrDutch1e
      @MrDutch1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The price difference would be minimal. Look at the cost difference between a base rt and a base scatpack for charger or challenger.

    • @jtc1964x
      @jtc1964x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      5.7 is a weak motor, no thanks

    • @mudshotit
      @mudshotit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jtc1964x actually… thats backwards lol

  • @samkloster3416
    @samkloster3416 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have a 392 on order.....Would be nice to see the 5.7 Gladiator.

  • @remywonderland7507
    @remywonderland7507 ปีที่แล้ว

    here in Hawaii, regular rubicons are stickered at over 80k. Heck, RT 5.7 challengers are 50k LOL Even if I'm not gonna get a 392 rubicon, I'm afraid to see how much it's marked up over here😬

  • @ricksomething
    @ricksomething 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the new intro better than the old one.

  • @arlandoamb6754
    @arlandoamb6754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree with everything that you said literally 👍🏿💯

  • @sheliacrowe5123
    @sheliacrowe5123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My type of vehicle period

  • @MegaPusheen23
    @MegaPusheen23 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish they’d at least put twin turbos on it or give it a motor like the one in the trackhawk

  • @SimOne-ky8ki
    @SimOne-ky8ki 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I LOVE my 392XR! I even traded my beloved built JKU for it. I was hoping it would be closer to 60k…
    However, I think its worth the cost if you look at the price of other new cars. This is a special edition vehicle, so of course the price is “special”.
    It’s a smooth riding go anywhere sleeper! Plus the MPG is basically the same as my JKU was.
    It’s definitely a niche vehicle, but it checked all my boxes (e.g. V8, small SUV, AWD, 4WD, rugged, fast, mod-able, Wrangler)
    Also, where are these low priced TRXs at???

  • @markwicke9291
    @markwicke9291 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would love a Wrangler Sport with a 5.7. It would probably be a little more practical. The 392 is just way out of my price range!!

  • @1smokan
    @1smokan ปีที่แล้ว

    There are plenty of folks with built jeeps costing well over 100K, I am one of them. The Wrangler 392 gives me what I want and that is power, the V6 is gutless with big tires and I don't like diesels or the turbo lagging 4 banger. Yes I would spend the money on a 392 Wrangler, also looking at future collectability and the fact that these will keep there value well over any hellcat which I also own.

  • @sid5156
    @sid5156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I gotta agree racerx for the money I'd definitely take a trx over that Rubicon, but thats just me.

  • @putz173
    @putz173 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    in Canada the jump from a 2.0t loaded Rubicon to the 392 is ~30000$ lol

  • @jacobgreen1301
    @jacobgreen1301 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the first of your videos I’ve seen and no homo or anything but your eyes are just PIERCING!!

  • @mritorresli6523
    @mritorresli6523 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thought I found one for 75k online only to find out the dealership threw a 30k markup on it and ruined my dreams of owning one. So I'll keep my widebody 392 Charger and eventually just get a regular Jeep Sahara, and throw a Ripp Supercharger in it

    • @joshreynolds729
      @joshreynolds729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it’s bull how these dodge dealers act. Same story in ford and Chevy. Just buy from a private seller and cut those ass hats out they don’t deserve to screw america anymore. You got a dream make it happen.

    • @1titans
      @1titans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don’t buy off the lot. Have the dealer order it

  • @SovereignKnight74
    @SovereignKnight74 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6.4 Jeep FTW!

  • @jimmycagle9142
    @jimmycagle9142 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love these Jeeps! Out of my price range. 😩 But, I've been happy with the performance of my 2013 3.6 v6 Wrangler Sport 2 Dr. I kept mine stock BUT did give it the Magna-Flow duel exhaust and the K&N cold air. Made a world of difference in the driving experience. Plus...I give it gas...it goes!

  • @reginamanzanares6726
    @reginamanzanares6726 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would and did! I love mine! ❤

  • @Skidz75
    @Skidz75 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 5.7 has been out now for like 100 years. Why Chrysler/Jeep/MOPAR/FCA/Daimler/Noww Stella….have they NEVER slapped a 5.7 in the wrangler??
    The 6 cyl for YEAAAAARRSS!! Why I never even contemplated buying one. Then when they do put a v8 in it, they go 80k and 6.4? And wait until gas is climbing and V8’s are on the way out. It’s madness I tel you! 😉

  • @dragvan1937
    @dragvan1937 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Like the 392 but would rather see a 5.7 version for the cost alone. Same exact vehicle only with the 5.7. And with the cost of gas 5.7 the 3.6 just doesn't get out of it's own way.

    • @MrDutch1e
      @MrDutch1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The base cost of vehicles like the challenger or charger on 5.7 vs 6.4 is only a couple thousand. It's just harder to find the 6.4 version without a ton of extras nowadays because there just aren't a lot of vehicle being made.

    • @joshgonzalez2112
      @joshgonzalez2112 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly! The 5.7 even sounds better.

  • @jcfc8197
    @jcfc8197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice looking Jeep, but I’ll stick to my 1990 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Classic is where it’s at.

  • @DavidRodriguez-tj9tf
    @DavidRodriguez-tj9tf ปีที่แล้ว

    Great one of the best

  • @marlow769
    @marlow769 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don’t forget that the Eco Diesel is a rocket ship too.

  • @Rickbee
    @Rickbee 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just want indigo blue or ocean blue back so I can order one now

  • @user-jt8xw6fd1v
    @user-jt8xw6fd1v 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does anyone know if it's possible to import the 392 Hemi version to Europe?

  • @wranglerlife4ever42
    @wranglerlife4ever42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those are not 33” tires (you said wheels but you meant tires)….this has the XR package which has 17x8 beadlock capable wheels with 315/70 tires (about a 35” tire) vs the 285/70 tires (about a 33” tire)

  • @extspence
    @extspence 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would I buy one? Yep, should arrive in July 🙂

  • @martinforde8605
    @martinforde8605 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gladiator 345/5.7l would be great👌

  • @geneevans7885
    @geneevans7885 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The new jeeps are clean. The V6 they put out a few years ago is mean.

  • @keonlinyear6678
    @keonlinyear6678 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I Like the 392 Wrangler but it’s way too expensive to not be able to get full use of it, I driven I base model jeep & couldn’t much use out of it where I live. If I stayed in Arizona I wouldn’t mind but i always thought they should have made 5.7 one first

  • @mblake0420
    @mblake0420 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want a gladiator with 392 but could never afford it

  • @aurorayoru5333
    @aurorayoru5333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s almost like FCA had plans to put v8s in their SUVs

  • @whatroads4x4
    @whatroads4x4 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im driving a 2013 wrangler. 3.6ltr with 305,000 miles. Got my moneys worth.
    As for the 392...its cool and all. But i dont think there are alot of jeepers willing to "offroad" such an expensive vehicle. Maybe some overlanding...but nothing hardcore

  • @peterspakosky9647
    @peterspakosky9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hell yeah I would

  • @kennymiller8217
    @kennymiller8217 ปีที่แล้ว

    So alot of Sahara owners argue their suspension is the same as a Rubicon , that true .
    I always thought a Rubicon was made with heavier parts ?

  • @CwGriff
    @CwGriff 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    would you trade a loaded 2020 Grand Cherokee SRT for it? considering but torn

  • @DefinitelyNotYouThankGod
    @DefinitelyNotYouThankGod 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I ordered a 392 Rubi last year… once it came in and let the $83,000 out the door sink in i ended up passing… its just way to much loot for a Jeep in my book. Another AWESOME upload X!

  • @VMAFIA
    @VMAFIA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The interior is pretty much identical too any other similar speced jl don't really know what you meant by that?

  • @whalerlife53
    @whalerlife53 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Straight pipe it and add a cam, then you’ll have a jeep that sounds correctly.

  • @toddhall3720
    @toddhall3720 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the 392, can you ever justify the cost? Depends on what the budget and heart says.

  • @TM-qn3qj
    @TM-qn3qj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would be my dream vehicle if it was available in a Manual Transmission, and no the crappy flappy paddle shifters don't count. Driving a performance vehicle with an automatic is like driving with a condom on. That's fine if that's what your use to, but I drive with all the feel I can get, the way driving was intended!

    • @jimpaine7455
      @jimpaine7455 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then by new 5.0/mustang. It will scare you. Traded my 2022 mach1 w/HP for my new Rubi.

  • @GhostRiderUSA
    @GhostRiderUSA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That would be on my wish list if I could afford it. My Cherokee Trailhawk has a 271hp 3.2L that gets around good for a Jeep.

  • @larrybushard3011
    @larrybushard3011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ordered one in January. Still no word

    • @RacerX9
      @RacerX9  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unreal ☹️

  • @Ih8chew
    @Ih8chew 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is everyone saying it should have a 5.7? That engine is ridiculously underpowered for its size by today’s standards and the gas mileage isn’t that far off from the 392. It makes complete sense for Stellantis to use the 392 as the last hurrah for 8 cylinder Wranglers. What doesn’t make sense is how expensive this thing is.

  • @anthonyspencerjr1369
    @anthonyspencerjr1369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everything is fine but the price and now fuel economy

  • @markremy4946
    @markremy4946 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why didn't they put the Boss 429 in it???

  • @the_metalist2221
    @the_metalist2221 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's sad this never came in a manual

  • @Fedup63
    @Fedup63 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    $90,000 is insane. Real jeep enthusiast will put the 392 in a jk or wrecked jl since all you need is the chassis and frame and interior everything else gets changed , motor transmission axles suspension

    • @1titans
      @1titans 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many are getting this with the Xtreme Recon package

  • @Mursedave
    @Mursedave 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think what led me to not buying the 392 was that it has cylinder deactivation. I ended up picking a TRX instead.

    • @mini2nut67
      @mini2nut67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They had to install it for CAFE reasons