Stephen Meyer Shatters the Myth of the Multiverse (Science Uprising EP4)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
- Is our universe just an accident? Or does it display exquisite evidence of fine-tuning and intelligent design? This episode of Science Uprising investigates claims by scientific atheists like Lawrence Krauss and Bill Nye that our universe is nothing special and that the fine-tuning scientists observe can be explained away by the existence of multiple universes.
In his latest book, Stephen Meyer demonstrates how discoveries in cosmology and physics coupled with those in biology help to establish the identity of the designing intelligence behind life and the universe. Be sure to visit scienceuprising.com/ to find more videos and explore related articles and books.
Featured experts include Bijan Nemati, Principal Research Scientist, University of Alabama, Huntsville, and former long-time researcher at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab; Frank Tipler, Professor of Mathematical Physics, Tulane University, and co-author of The Anthropic Cosmological Principle; and Stephen Meyer, PhD, Director, Center for Science and Culture, Discovery Institute and author, The Return of the God Hypothesis.
Check out our other videos:
Information Enigma: Where does information come from?
Information drives the development of life. But what is the source of that information? • Information Enigma: Wh...
Science Uprising Episode 1 - Reality: Real vs. Material
Has science proven we are all just matter? Or does reality extend beyond what we can see and touch? • Michael Egnor Demolish...
Unbelievable Myths Neil deGrasse Tyson and Co. Love to Tell
• Unbelievable Myths Nei...
Check out other videos from this playlist:
• See more of Science Up...
Subscribe to our channel: / discoverysciencenews
============================
Science Uprising
Well-known scientists have been preaching a materialistic worldview rather than presenting the public with all the evidence. We are here to change that. The objective scientific evidence does not prove our universe is blind and purposeless. It does not show we are simply meat machines. It does not prove that evolutionary mechanisms can completely account for the diversity of life on earth. This is what THEY want you to think. Think for yourself and make an informed decision.
Are you ready? The uprising has begun.
Visit the Science Uprising website at scienceuprising.com/ to find more videos and explore related articles and books. You can also find out more information about the people interviewed in this episode. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Stephen Meyer is right on the money. Very smart man.
Stephen Meyer's remarkable study has essentially demolished the multiverse myth.
The most scientifically accurate statement Bill Nye ever said is in this video: "I suck." Amen, Mr. Nye. Amen.
😂
Interesting, although the lack of any evidence of intelligent life anywhere else in the universe somewhat counters the argument that this universe is perfectly suited for life if there’s virtually no life in it.
Also, suggesting Earth has perfect conditions for life seems to have it backwards to me as surely life evolved to cope with the conditions it found. Until we find more life in the universe we can’t really know if life needs such a narrow window of atmosphere and minerals to exist. If those conditions are as rare as it currently seems, that would argue against the universe being built for us.
The presence of the moon is an interesting one though. Its distance from Earth is so ideal that it allows us perfect views of the sun’s corona during an eclipse which is quite an amazing coincidence. Of course, the moon is slowly moving away from the Earth each year so sadly even that won’t last forever...
life didn't "evolve" in the sense of bottom-up macroevolution common ancestry, that is both logically and biologically impossible as there is clearly a huge difference between the various families, and between humans, animals and plants and everything is a top-down proccess of dna from what we observe today
If I purchased all the material I needed to build a house and put it on a block of land, how long would I have to wait before it put it self together!!!
I can’t wait that long.....I’m getting a builder.
Lol
That is literally the perfect example
This deserves more views
Multiverses sounds like an "argument from desperation", if there is such a thing.
It's a favorite ESCAPE HATCH for people who want to avoid the Theistic implications of our fine-tuned universe.
Tommy Applecore The idea of the Multi-verse provides a psychological safe space for those for whom fine-tuning is an uncomfortable reality.
It sounds like faith: "Faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.
"
Absolutely. Multiverse is an ad hoc theorem, not even a theory, which requires numerous supporting ad hoc notions and which is concieved as a perverse response to visible evidense.
Ptolemy's epicycles got nothin' on multiverse.
@@LoveYourNeighbour. it permits astronomy professors the excuse to Rodger their female students.
It's no longer cool or edgy to be an atheist.
I like the more aggressive theme of asserting the evidence rather than defending against every vapid accusation.
Me too. Strong evidence deserves to be firmly asserted.
The accusations & empty objections are endless... 'God of the gaps' 'dishonest creationists' 'who made God?' etc, etc. Sometimes it's better to "not answer a fool according to his folly" (Proverbs 26:4).
I love how the man at the beginning uses purposeful language to convey meaningful statements about a universe that lacks purpose and meaning.
Top production skill, unassailable arguments, and a heart for God . . what more could you ask?
Meyer's study is a robust critique of the multiverse concept as well as a compelling case for the universe's finite existence.
I just look at all the beauty in nature and I know that it was created with love
@@PLASKETT7 next time you see a Jehovahs witness, ask for the Book "What does the Bible really teach? They have the only accurate Biblical answer as to why God allows natural disasters in this age. (Greek aeon).
God created a perfect world with no sickness, pain, or death.
But mankind's sin messed up the very ecology of this planet.
See Romans 8:20-22, Jeremiah 12:4 and 11, as well as Matthew 24:7-8.
Beauty is beautifull.
God is not to be known verbally. Rationalization is to weak and small.
Only a small God would fït in ideas and words.
The world is big. Reality is bigger. It is sizeless.
I love to watch such kinds of videos and especially this channel is coming up with some great content
Okay I'm hooked on this channel now I'm a new sub x
"Far from exposing human beings as incidental products of blind physical forces, science suggests that the existence of conscious organisms is a fundamental feature of the Universe. We have been written into the laws of nature in a deep and, I believe, meaningful way...I cannot believe that our existence in this Universe is a mere quirk of fate, an accident of history, an incidental blip in the great cosmic drama. Our involvement is too intimate...*We are truly meant to be here*" - Paul Davies; a physicist, cosmologist, and astrobiologist.
its not about proving religions right its about knowing the truth ....if universe signifies any possible creator than so be it..its not about filling your books and novels with hundreds baseless theories ..it about the truth ..and if God is the truth then so be it.........many people think religions are vague anceint primitive stuffs...despite seeing themselves standing on ancestral shoulders
We adapted to earth not other way around
Perfect. Now that the earth is filling up can you now go and adapt to the moon please?
wow, these new Discovery Institute videos are next-level fierce. Well done, DI!
Having not been trained in natural sciences, I and all other laymen on this field have to rely on scientists who know what they are talking about. I am somewhat uncertain what to think about ID because it really is a label that has received a lot of negative attention and I am not so sure if that is only due to defamation but maybe also due to using ID as a category by ID-supporters themselves (kind of like "either you are ID or you are a Darwinist"). I know about some other scientists who have no affiliation with ID as a scientific movement, some of them even being Darwinists, but having no problem with naturalistic explanations where they are reasonably applies (e.g. Theodosius Dobzhansky, George Ellis, Henry Stapp, Stephen Barr, etc.). But anyways, no matter whether some arguments are not so robust as they may appear at a later point in time, I am thankful for those kinds of information and debates because they nevertheless clearly show that there are a lot of open questions that have become doctrines for materialists and that their information, which they sell as fact, are nothing more but interpretations of scientific findings rather than facts that prove or disprove anything in the metaphysical realm. I am also thankful because, no matter who is in the end right with regard to scientific explanations, the information clearly exposes that materialist scientists hijacked science and deceive the public by pretending that the philosophy of materialism is necessary in order to do science (and to be honest: would I have not found scientists who expose the flaws of this enterprise, it would have left me with nothing more than with despair, those people are thugs). I guess that this will sooner or later backfire at them and discredit their philosophy. Ironically, the materialist hijacking of science is most similar to the banditry and the deception that some churches used in the middle ages in order to control people and to violate their area of competence.
Μάριος Παππάς
”We fight not against flesh and blood....but against powers and principalities”!
I commented on your post under the name of Tim Wright Family above. BTW Christendom today , all 33,000 divisions are money driven deceivers. Jehovahs witnesses alone have been entrusted with the truth. Visit JW.org and click on Bible Questions, then Bible Questions answered
I like your name in greek letters. By the way, what is your metaphysical position about our universe?
Ralph Goreham no they arent
What a great message. I love god and science when the science is about understaning how we all play this role of ourselfs in this giant biological machine. What a great message for people
I'm a cosmological insomniac...it propells the mind into a warp drive that is incomprehensible to most people.my conscious awareness is continually expanding into arenas that were previously completely closed to me...
nice
I love how wholesome this content is!
Thanks for the video👍🏻 helped me out in faith in God
This has to be one of the most wholesome videos I have ever seen
Keep up the excellent work. This was an exceptional video from you
Thanks....there is more than that which meets the naturalistic eye.
Yes the cells of life are like a universe in itself, a marvel of super complexity
@@ralphgoreham3516 Yes. Intelligent Design is getting obvious now!! God bless brother.
These videos are really amazing
Your in the great games now, and the great games are terrifying!
I am so happy that I did not miss out on it
Thanks so much for making and posting this Discovery.
Thank you guys. Keep it up
Great graphics, sounds and clips; no need for the mask though, eh? A voice over is good: you have many credible quotes and facts... no need for gimmicks. This is serious stuff; it means life!
I am starting to really dig this channel.
It's absolutely Divine!
Alfred Russel Wallace has been written out of history by the materialists because he came to believe in intelligent design. Evolution started out as the “Darwin/Wallace” theory. I was taught that back in the 60s. Now Wallace, a much better scientist than Darwin, has been sent to the memory hole.
@Bastad Kock I saw that movie. It caused a paradox and all existence blinked out. Sorry.
Greetings,
Time travel?
It takes 20 minutes to walk a mile, 2 minutes by car.
Yeah 18 minutes shortened.
Too much tv makes time lost.
Certainly time travel is more a fable.
Thanks
Thanks for the comment. I never heard of him! Another evidence to your premise that he was written out if history. I'll look him up now though!
If we’re so special, why are we willfully destroying the very planet that sustains us?
Bcuz mankind is greedy and will put forth their desires before their necessity
UltrafiAV greed
Marxists and Communists did MORE damage to the environment than the West. (Chernobyl)
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
Universe means everything. The concept of multiverses is elementary school level silliness for adults.
Perhaps the lack of evidence "anywhere else in the universe" for life, could be for the simple reason that the "intelligent Designer" has something in mind other than creating life for the sole purpose of an arbitrary saltation of organisms throughout the universe en masse. In contrast, by creating "you/us" alone, it becomes an abundance of evidence to infer just how special by comparison we are. Seems like Genesis 1... As for the assumption that "life evolved to cope with the conditions it found" as one noted, life doesn't merely find a way. First, life must exist, before it can "find" anything. Second, a "way"(materialistic) must be feasible, and given the odds, it isn't. Search youtube: (Origin: Probability of a Single Protein Forming by Chance) and (James Tour: The Mystery of the Origin of Life) why it is not feasible. Third, to "find" is a goal directed word and intent laden with purpose, teleology as to assume that existence(of life/differential reproduction) matters. Fourth, if life is the consequence of any condition as assumed in the mantra "life finds a way" then given the abundance of variety of conditions in space, where are all supposed life forms everywhere else in the universe if the plasticity of "life finds a way" is meritable?
Thank you for sharing your precious video with us
this video deserves much more success, I wonder what is due to the perversion of many individuals in wanting to reduce this miracle to a simple zero probability, even if our universe were one in a billion, as would however explain the perfection with which every mechanism of life is it perfectly set? Sometimes I think that many scientists just want to totally eliminate the possibility of the idea of a "higher intelligence" and that therefore they are directing their blind studies all in a direction that does not exist and that they would like to make sense of.
Which does Occam’s razor suggest, an infinite number of accidental universes or one universe and one Creator?
Ouch! cut by Occam's razor!
ALLAH
either of them require God anyway, multiverse is an even more complex material thing which even more requires inevitably an eternal imaterial creator, it cant come by itself
This is amazing! Thanks for posting. 🙂
This was indeed a much-appreciated video
Ok i never thought moon was so necessary 😱😱😱
Father of the H-Bomb Edward Teller wanted to blow it up in the 1950s to intimidate the Soviets. I kid you not!
There are no *accidents*
Great video!
Why would i think im insignificant and suck if theres not a designer?? Being so absolutely rare in this vast universe makes me feel amazing!! Far from insignificant. Considering how unimaginably huge the universe is its not really too surprising that theres one(or more!) goldilocks planets in it.
The Amateurs I mean the chances of even one completely perfect planets is literally so low it could only happen through intelligent design
@@zainkhan5692 You're confusing the fact that our species evolved on this planet, with the myth that this planet was created for us to live on.
Zain Khan I hate arguments that are entirely based on: “well, I don’t think this is right, therefore this must be right”
Zain Khan a die with one million sides is almost guaranteed to roll a 1 if you roll it 7 trillion times
The universe is so large it ends up being nearly impossible the right conditions don’t exist somewhere
Amazing video ! Subscribed!
If you put logic and math into this, then there is a reason for everything. It’s kinda hard to explain on text, but here:
If the multiverse is real and the theory of the “dead/alive cell” is true, then the universe would be splitting up into two universes every infinite fraction of a second so there are infinite universes infinitely splitting. This is also due to the choices you make. In this universe, let’s say you decide to watch a movie and in another one, you don’t. That right there is logically impossible. There are so many factors to the decisions you make that makes it impossible for any other decision to be made. In this universe, you watch a movie due to the fact that it’s Friday, you just got off work, the new movie came out that day and many more factors that play in the role of you making your decision. If in another you universe you just decide not to watch a movie, that universe can not and will never exist because it’s impossible. You watch the movie that day BECAUSE of these reasons.
My point is, there’s a reason for everything and a logical explanation to every decision you make. The factors are physical features like “what you ate that day, or what time it is” and mental features like “are mad or sad, are a sociopath or a gentle person”
I'm especially tickled by their way of stating the anthropic principle: "You don't suck." Clever, sound, and current.
I'm surprised the photon/electron particle experiment wasn't mentioned as it pretty much answers the question.
Joseph King which question?
Photons/electrons?
maybe... maybe not.
Probably not.
He cites the example of people supposing there are more planets than there are because they perceive things in space.
Materialistic Worldview comes down to.. I believe in Magic Pixie Dust..
Excellent 👍
Another great video. I also love the lengthier interviews you guys release later.
These are awesome. Wish I had these in college!
Me too. Bio Chemistry is killing the evos but schools, the Lab coat brigade, the entertainment industy and NASA ensure mouths are kept shut. Then there is pride and reputations. But neo Darwinism (not adaption) will be swept away with the coming judgment on this world. The second greatest lie (after the immortal soul or spirit) gone with this satanic controlled world.
This is actually pretty good!
Damn I actually never considered it that way 🤔
Very good!
Thanks for speaking the long, silent truth. 🧐👍
Michelle said "the universe is expanding", if it's fine tuned how is it possible that it is expanding?
Man, after watching this one, I am eager to know what's coming next
Wauw mantep betul sangat menyenangkan
The one thumbs down is proof of the multi-verse because that's where it came from!!!!
Denying the undeniable. Multiverse!!!!???
Yes. It's about finding the truth...
Really interesting video, thank you for sharing. Truly something to ponder about.
I had no idea about this until I watched this video
The arguments for intelligent design are convincing enough without the massive sound effects and cheer leading on offer here. These actually detract from the points being made by making them seem emotive, when they are purely rational. Emotion rarely wins an argument with anyone except the gullible, particularly in an age when it is unthinkingly accepted that the only way to prove anything is true is to have clear evidence or a tight chain of logic.
More important, the most powerful argument for intelligent design was left out. James Crick, one of the three (yes, there were three) discoverers of DNA, on which all known life depends, published a further paper in the mid 1950s in which he pointed out that DNA is code, just like the code used to program a computer. It happens to be a very sophisticated and truly massive code in fact.
Not one single instance had ever been discovered of any code whatsoever having been generated by anything but an intelligent agent.
No other natural codes other than DNA? I don't think that's correct.
You need a designer and engineer to build a house, but you get 2 rocks hitting each other and create the highly complex earth and its life.
Por favor agreguen subtitulos al español!
I agree. The multiverse theory is a desperate attempt to explain away this unique fine tuned universe. If this fine tuned universe happened by mere-chance, that in itself would be a bigger miracle then if it happened by intelligent design. It would be like a massive puzzle 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 randomly but purposefully putting it self together.
The Heavens declare the glory of God!
The universe is ever expanding yet our atmosphere is not ,that is design in motion .
The universe is so large that these coincidences like Jupiter protecting us from asteroids and a moon for a stable climate would happen eventually.
Wouldn’t these physicists have considered that? I mean they didn’t want to make this video 1 hour + long so they obviously can’t include a counter to every single argument. Idk tho
Great video! thank you🙏🏼
AMEN!
The argument is that if there are an endless number of worlds, one of them must be appropriate for life.
Here's the thing I've noticed. Our Materialist friends never say those 5 little words...But...I...Could...Be...Wrong. No matter what you put in front of them, they are convinced they are right, and you are wrong...oh and stupid....How could I have forgotten Stupid.
Very true indeed! This is the difference between the skeptic and the cynic. The skeptic might be resistant to the truth due to their specific world view, but when faced with solid evidence against that belief, they will alter their position to accept the truth where it leads - regardless. The cynic, on the other hand, continues to grip their beliefs with a stronghold never weakened, no matter what the evidence presented to them reveals. This ideology is also referred to as delusional thinking. Time and time again, the materialist/naturalist position is shown to be inescapably weak, if not totally false. Yet, because of certain atheistic presuppositions, people will continue to hold onto such ideology because they have no other choice, unless they so choose to change their thinking. I am quite proud of those who have been confronted with the scientific reasoning of intelligent design and an intelligent mind, and those who have come to terms with their false thinking, and have exchanged their fallacies for a position that not only makes sense, but follows the evidence where it leads - to the best explanation.
When they say "atheism is a lack of belief", don't trust them. They want to have that lack of belief because of their pride
@@richardbutler9692 Wow! Such a good and adequate comment! Well done!
Makes sense...materialism is a faith, not science.
you don't know what you are talking about. every good scientists know that they could be wrong.
I bet that there is nothing that could change youur mind about god, you don't even think you could be wrong
I like this video, but the problem with the "building on a planet" analogy is that the atheists will say that we evolved on this planet because those things were here. So of course they help us, it's how we evolved. Just be aware they'll throw that argument at you.
Yes. There is some circularity in the argument.
But it doesn't matter unless your main interest is to deny. Or enhance the deniability aspect of God's existance too much.
He even does not exist. (i.e. is somehow also Out of the realm of things existing).
Love the video, but could you also touch on Sean Carroll's argument that not only can there be a multiverse but that something can literally spontaneously come into existence out of nothing? He seems to believe a universe can create itself....
Can we please think for a second,
Let’s say you have a trillion-quadrillion whatever people and you have the same amount of boxes under one of these boxes is a chocolate. Each man is said to chose only one box.
Now the chances of finding chocolate are very low. But the one who finds it would feel as if it was purposefully there for him. While others would only know the reality. The reason why we think of the universe as purposeful is because we’re lucky and we’re EXTREMELY lucky. Our existence itself tells us how lucky we are. The people of the universes with imprecise gravity didn’t even exist incase we wanted to ask them. That’s exactly the problem. We can’t base our conclusion on only ourselves we need more examples but the problem is that we can’t know because the imprecise universes didn’t existed
The problem with your line of reasoning is that it implies having many tries to choose.
But in our universe case, the "chocolate picker" has only one try 😁
So, one try to choose from 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 boxes and get lucky is possible but not plausable ☺️
Can you tell me Please which program do you use to edit you video?
Yes, I am intrigued as well
The video is very telling of not only the failure of scientific atheism to explain the origins of the universe
thru their possibly perceived , but likely deceived postulation of it's poor design design. But it also
showcases their complete lack of recognition and/or acknowledgement of the millions of nonessential
things that make life interesting and enjoyable. So , if we lived in this imperfect atheistic planet within
this imperfect universe , then we should be limited to only basic essentials to sustain life. Why we should
have only a dozen or so trees , flowers , animals and fish in our imperfect planet to sustain us . This would be
an ideal eviroment for the Krausse's , Coynes and Dawkins of this world since they might be able to make
a limited argument for their lack of one today. It's amazing how this Evolutionary Ideology imprisons ones
ability to recognize or perceive the magnitude of the incredible amount of purposed information needed
to engineer and create the life we see on this planet that pales everything humans have, or will ever create?
So when all science and common sense alludes your main tenets , blame it on God , or sorry lack of one?
Well made. More of these please. 😁
So interesting video. Unfortunately doesn't get a lot visioning like other they get millions even not really important.
Good point
I love this channel. Subscribe, watch and enjoy before You Tube bans it.
رائع
If you find yourself in a creation, your existence confirms a creator. The question is: what is the nature of that creator? There are many answers. You're free to believe what you like.
8:00 we are the borg?
:P
We are living everything in reverse, that is why everything is already in the right place... it’s all just where we left it
Here's my argument: just like irrational numbers never repeat, even with a limited amount of symbols (aka 1-9), so too shall an entire array of cellular design be formed by blind mutation.
In actuality, the world is limited, and the multiverse notion is only a philosophical conjecture.
Was there a science uprising 05?? I saw a video but it said it was private =/
Episode 05 will be released next Monday (July 1st), so stay tuned!
@@DiscoveryScienceChannel I look forward to seeing these every week. I wish it was an every day thing but I'm grateful for you guys doing them weekly. Thank you very much. These videos confirm my faith greatly. GOD Bless.
@@DiscoveryScienceChannel thank you for replying! I guess I jumped the gun a little by automatically accusing youtube of censorship in my head. lol Oopsies
More importantly, great job with those videos!
There is one coming, it will be released next Monday morning.
Life would evolve in the universe regardless of the setting given enough time.
This is not true because changing the constants would cause us to have a universe consisting only of hydrogen so there is no potential possibility for any life.
This idea has been around since the 1950s, and it has been used to explain away the universe's fine-tuning.
Great videos - unfortunately degraded by the loud, distracting background music dominating the voice-overs throughout - difficult to concentrate on the message free of this unnecessary imposition. 'Background' music please, not 'foreground' ! That said, these valuable & timely Science Uprising presentations are very much appreciated and heartily applauded.
At first glance, I thought the red colored Guy Fawkes masks were images of Colonel Sanders. Maybe I'm hungry for some fried chicken. And, maybe I have a weird craving for another quintuple bypass surgery also!
Interesting advert I ever clicked on
Lol so true!