3 New Rules You Should Know... About The 2022-24 Code
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- #gymnastics #masterclass #sports
The International Gymnastics Federation has officially released the 2022-2024 Code of Points, which will be the rulebook for Artistic Gymnastics for the next 3 years, applicable from January 1st 2022 to December 31th 2024.
In this video, we'll take a look at 3 major changes that will be introduced in the new Code.
Patreon: / sporteverywhere
Instagram: / sporteverywheregym
Twitter: / sporteveryw
Facebook: / sporteverywheregym
D-Score
Fails
Falls
Sticks
Spotters
Sporteverywhere
Gymnastics
Simone Biles
2020
Tokyo 2021
Jade Carey
Sunisa Lee
Rebeca Andrade
Gold
Silver
USA
MyKayla Skinner
Olympics
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The first rule applies only to wolf turns, not other roots. It is desribed in section 7.2.1d of the Code published on May, 12th 2021: "Only one turn (pirouette) in tuck stand on one leg (BB & FX) will receive DV, in chronological order".
Excited for the rolls and flares on beam!
Same.
Yaa. Maybe beem routines will stop being obvious
Agree that will be interesting
Flares aren’t gonna become anymore common🤣 u basically have to train pommels for 3 years mimimum to get them
In all honestly, no smart coach is gonna just give up doing a full turn for the .5 requirement. It’s just not worth it.
I'm SO happy about the last rule, I love flairs and back extension rolls on beam
Same here! I love an opportunity for more imaginative elements.
I don't like the first move, it's used in mens gymnastics. I don't think it should be in womens
@@lovekuraii lots of moves are used in both mens and womens though
I think the rules are fine but the one touch before event finals needs to happen, and not just as a preference, it's a safety issue
After many complaints they will add one touch to event finals! I saw a statement published on twitter.
@@carlosvalentin9670 ok good!
What’s one touch?
@@TheGeographyWatch it's like before the gymnasts goes in the event finals, they get a one touch warmup on the apparatus, they do it for the all around, but not for individual event finals
I think allowing rolls etc. is ok but they should also be made to have 1 full turn at minnium on beam as people will relie on those as replacement thus eliminating dance element from beam.
What are the roots for the turns ?
Very well done video thank you !
The root is the shape you turn in. The most common roots are:
- Turn with foot to knee (with knee at horizontal)
- Turn with leg at horizontal
- Turn with leg at Vertical
- Wolf Turn
-Illusion Turn
- Needle turn
I really like all of these changes. I think it will being some much needed uniqueness and variation to many routines.
Thank you for posting this data
Here's the thing: I wonder whether the option of rolls, flairs and circles will actually bring them back, because I imagine gymnasts have trained for years for a different style of gymnastics? (In a similar sense to how really powerful gymnasts might struggle to have the kind of lines/extensions of what people call the more "elegant" gymnasts - not sure if I'm making sense here)
I’m excited for these rules. I’m sick to death of wolf turns, so I’m glad we’ll be seeing less of them. Also excited for the diversity we might be seeing in beam routines - they’ve gotten pretty boring in recent years. Glad that the code is encouraging creativity and diversity of skills.
Looks exciting! Can’t wait to see what the gymnasts do for routines.
I think it's a good thing. The uneven bars and beam used to be so much more creative and interesting so hopefully this will bring back the flair and other moves!
Can they add the Mukina flip on uneven bars back I miss it
Hate double wolf turns as they are so overused. I like the addition of the first rule.
I like the rules! The beam will be more entertaining!
question from a non-gymnast: if they do completely different turns either back to back or elsewhere in the routine, will the second still not be counted even if it's different?
As long as they’re not both wolf turns, they will be counted
I like Gymnastics skills because it will continue training skill bonus points. 👉👈👇😉👌👍
Can’t wait to stop seeing a triple double wolf turn. Sick of it lol
So on floor a gymnast can not perform the memmel & Mustafina turn 😞
fasinating
For me, no more ugly wolf turn
Maybe change that thumbnail
Do we thank Simone for this awesome changes?
Simone is just a gymnast, she doesn't have any bearing on the changes of the code...
@@cathy997 she definitely is pushing the sport to its maximum
@@austinxa2339 I agree she's exceptional. However, she is still not responsible for the changes in the code.
Just ban those wolf turns please, take forever to set up and they are plain ugly! Hehe!
This would not be considering the enjoyment and preparedness of the gymnasts. They shouldn't be banned just because some fans prefer other turns. The leg description has been changed so next quad they can only have a straight leg. Maybe you'll see turns more to your standard. Or if you watch compulsory comps where execution bears more value?
Rolls, flairs and circles are exciting additions. I like any rule that incentivises creativity and hopefully allows the gymnast more choices!
I hope gymnasts bring back the more creative mounts from the past.
Yesss
Agreed, the new ones aren't very interesting
I hope so too
I wish beam demanded a handstand element instead of that stupid " hips must touch beam " nonsense.
Both would be good
Particularly from a skill standpoint…I, who have not been on a balance beam since I was 9, could jump on it, lay down, and fulfil the “hips must touch the beam” requirement. Not for my life could I do a handstand on the beam, however, so any skill requirement that shows a mastery of something else would greatly benefit the routine
is that why everyone seems to have the exact same lie down on the beam pose?
@@itisdevonly Yup 100%
I wish leg hold turns would replace wolf turns. They are so much more beautiful and graceful!
Although there are a handful who do wolf turns beautifully, so maybe not replace. But I totally agree. Most look awful, especially on floor
i think it's the deduction of keeping your leg above horizontal that gets the gymnasts. Lots struggle to keep their leg above 90°
wolf turns are not exciting to watch at all. Their not elegant at all, just so messy looking and wobbly :/
@@emilyk3256 Yes. Love Simone but they always praise her speed on wolf turns but her arms flail around to keep balance.
I like that gymnasts are going to cut back on the turns. It's even so monotonous seeing EVERY gymnast do multiple turns. I just wish they'd completely devalue those awful wolf turns on floor
Wolf turns are awful to watch and in almost every routine. I agree 👍
Agreed too! I hate seeing the same things with every gymnast.
The dismount bonus change doesn’t make sense to me. Losing the requirement was a boon to gymnasts who wanted higher execution or to avoid injury, and now they have lost that benefit.
A mount bonus (+.2 for a C or higher?) would be way cooler IMO.
Agreed. Or increase the difficulty. .2 for an E or higher dismount is the direction I think they should have gone.
if F.I.G ad and handstand requirement, beam routines can be more diversy too.
Yes! I totally agree! Hand stand, planche, upper body strength elements would help diversify beam. Floor and vault are the leg events. If more handstand were required on beam, it would be less of a leg event.
I am actually good with these rules right now...which feels weird. Good job FIG.
...God that leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
I hate that they downgraded vault but I’m fine with everything else
@@Matthew-jh6oh Oh I don't like the vault thing. These 3 specifically, I don't have a problem with.
@@matthewhines9787 what do you think they should have done about vault?
@@Matthew-jh6oh I'm fine with downgrading vault, because it makes that one event more equitable in scoring with the other events. This way a gymnast who is super strong on vault doesn't have such an advantage in the all-around.
@@candacebordelonph.d.8890 I think Bars is the one that is the most uneven, not vault. Plus I don’t think a gymnast should medal in the AA if they can’t compete at least a DTY
I’m so excited to see more creativity on beam! I miss the older style.
I love the new flairs rule, but no one will be able to replicate pengs flairs.
I wholeheartedly agree. No woman does the flairs like Peng did them.
I secretly also hope that no one ever will too :)
Excited about the new code!!! Wolf turns (while extremely impressive to pull off) look terrible, plus it will hopefully encourage changes so that all routines don't appear very similar 😀.
During the Olympics I've watched a lot of gymnastics videos from the 80s and I thought those rolls, flairs and circles were quite fun! I was disappointed to see they were completely gone from the more recent performances (I know nothing about gymnastics, can't even do a cartwheel) let alone last Olympics
So glad they brought them back!
Does the no back to back turns rule apply to every type of turn? I like the fact we wont be seeing 5 wolf turns in every routine but i dont want it to penalize another creative turn connections like the ones from Sanne :(
The triple wolf turn should have been downgraded to D tho, it is not as hard as a Mustafina or a Gomez.
@@lauraa. Really???
@@lauraa. I guess they changed it as the provisional COP only disallowed back to back wolf turn
You can still have a turn series, just not back to back turns like the wolf-wolf
It’s to prevent wolf turn double dribbling basically
Anything that encourages creativity is a positive influence. If the new codes spawn new elements on the apparatus, then they are positive steps forward.
I’m excited to see some 90’s inspired balance beam routines.
I like most of the changes, but I’d personally prefer to see more easier but well executed dismounts, not less.
Imagine people pushing horrible cowboyed unmastered double tucks... G... I'd rather watch double twists all day. Hated that new rule. 0.2 is too much. A 0.1 I would be fine with.
I still think some gymnasts will stick with the C-level dismount because the risk at that point is not worth the reward. I think combined with the new 2nd rule having the extra bonus at the end isn't going to push most to a D or higher dismount. I know the announcers don't like the easier dismounts, but I like them, they are cool looking and tend to be cleaner.
@@elizalagonia1049 Gymnasts are always going for the reward. I don't have that much faith like you.
@@elizalagonia1049 Me too. I love to watch the chinese beam routines that have super difficult skills on the beam and end with a pretty clean dismount.
@@eimardgomes1128 Lame! Double twists belong in College! Lame! This aint the 80's.... You like meals with no dessert. Its because of the lame dismounts that the rule was changed! Please you must a newbie. The Chinese girls had steller form on their double backs off beam. Do yo beamsearch.
I'm so so happy they're trying to encourage rolls flairs and circles again, will bring back so much variety in routines, I just hope they're scored appropriately to incentivise them.
very excited about the dismount changes. it makes no sense to see olympic gymnast going from hitting full ins, triple full beam dismounts to double twists almost every routine
I wish holds on beam had value.
What will the Chinese gymnasts do for a dismount if they can no longer get away with a double twist and double tuck off beam?
I thought a double tuck was a D dismount. Is it only C?
@@pyotrrossetti you are correct! Thank you for the observation. So I'll just snark on their double twist!
They used to do double pike or two and half twist off the beam in previous code so they will most likely go back to that, and double tuck is a D skill
they do more double pikes than double tucks.
I'm thinking that the Code is just being changed to gratify the viewing audience, not for legitimate athletic reasons. In fact, the emphasis on harder dismounts increases the risk of injuries, which is *against* the athletes' best interests. I'm beginning to feel guilty about following gymnastics, because I feel my interest is propping up an ultimately exploitative system, with no concern for the long term health effects of constantly pushing gymnasts to attempt more spectacular elements, which increases the risk of overuse injuries as devastating falls.
In my opinion, I just don't see a clear goal or direction in which this sport is moving. I've noticed a pattern in the last couple of quads: one Code will introduce a new rule, then it creates a "problem" and in the next Code they try to "fix it".
Just like I mentioned in the video:
- new rule: eliminating the D+ dismount requirement.
- problem created: gymnasts doing C-dismounts.
- how to "fix it": give +0.2 bonus if you perform a D-dismount.
To me, it just feels like taking 2 steps forward and 1 step backward but you're still standing in the same spot...
I know the fans like the , Rolls, flairs and circles but it's just a matter of time before it's over used like the Candle mount and everyone starts complaining.
i like the wolf turn rule and the flares and rolls, but making a D dismount an F just seems weird to me
Great video as always! Not a fan of the dismount bonus but love the changes regarding the turns.
On a side note you spelled rolls wrong in the video.
So let me get this straight. They are now encouraging more difficult dismounts but still won’t give Simon’s skills what they worth because they’re too dangerous. When they are encouraging a higher DOD on more dangerous dismounts. FIG is a joke.
I want to see the FIG award a 0.2 bonus for C+ or D+ mounts for bars and beam. Bring back the interesting mounts!!
I love it! I really miss the uniqueness of the beam mounts. Definitely makes it more artistic & interesting.
❤️xoxo❤️
So... they didn't want to award Biles good difficulty on her dismount, and now they make a rule to force people to upgrade their dismounts... #facepalm
I think that they put that bonus to make easier dismount be worth like more difficult ones.. If there's that bonus, nobody needs to do simone's dismount or something similar.. A double front for example is an F, +0,2 becomes like an H dismount.. I think they did this even for that reasons.
@@myran7765 F+ dismounts already gave 0.2 bonus in the previous code..
I like that we will see variety not just triple double wolf turn cause you get higher difficulty which is so boring I would like to see more different turn series
i love that flairs and rolls are coming back but i personally ally think the arm switch really interrupts the flow of a beam routine
i’m excited that the flairs and circles will incentivize some creativity on beam, but i can’t logically figure out why those would qualify as a turn
I agree. They're not testing the same kind if ability/fitness
Why don't they give the same bonus for difficult mounts too?
Looks like they’re trying to reintroduce some of the artistry that’s been lost for the past handful of years!!! I’m happy about it 😊
Ugh I wish the 0.2 bonus was for E+ dismounts because there are a lot fewer of those so we’d get to see more. It would stop literally everyone from doing the same full twisting double tuck or double layout off bars and double pike off floor, because those have gotten soooo boring over the years and a bonus for E+ would lead to a lot more variety in routines, which is a big part of what makes this sport so fun to watch!
This 3 years under this new rule will be something... I hate it already.
I can hardly wait to watch the rolls, flairs, and circles! Love to see them add more art in artistic! ❤️❤️
omg the kyla clip at the beginning, miss her competing
I'm all for CoP adjustments that enable these ladies to show some creativity and originality!
Rip wolf turn
Glad to see the rolls flairs and circles change. Beam and bars need to incentivize harder mounts, too.
idk kinda seems like theyre just trying to bring old gymnastics back
I am so glad to see that gymnasts will be rewarded for more difficult dismounts. All those simpler dismounts were getting boring after a while, I can see why some gymnasts opt to do a C dismount under the current rules but it makes it boring for the spectator and the gymnastics fan who would love to see a more spectacular, difficult dismount.
Essas mudanças são limitantes!
É diferente quando ,por motivo de SEGURANÇA, um movimento é banido. Agora vai ficar tudo padronizado e a criatividade será punida. Estão tentando favorecer alguém?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Just to clairify: the first rule refers to the root to the turn, so can do 2 turns in a row so long as the legs are in a different position. For example if somone does a Wolf turn then stands and does a turn with leg at hip level that's okay?
Thank goodness we’ve seen the end of back-to-back wolf turns! I think it’s a hideously ugly move.
Does this mean Sanne Wevers beam routine composition with her turn series would be heavily down graded this Triennium??
Thanks FIG for getting rid of the horrendous back to back wolf turns
Yea the back to back turns was way overused. Are they deducted for the arm waving on the wolf turns?
I'm thinking that it is making gymnastics competition to tuff
and it's makin9[ my brain is just go together sorry hope you can understand what I was trying to say
B+F, B+G... dismounts still have a 0.2 connection value? Because if they do, a round off triple full, for example, will give an extra 0.4 alone!
@Justin Tavares good to know! Thanks
Can the wolf turn just be banned outright? Looking forward to seeing some more interesting turns and spins.
I wish the 0.2 bonus for D+ dismounts also applied to mounts...
Is this a rules? I like rules, if i play rules i am ruled by ruler. My own rules rule for the rules of rule rulling rule
I like the rule that treat wolf turn 1080 and 720 as same root and only one can be counted.
Os giros comuns foram nerfados também?
Ginastas holandesas usam vários giros iguais em suas rotinas e nunca vi ninguém reclamar
Thank goodness wolf turns will go by the wayside. 🤮
Just bring back the best code: 2009-2012.
The beam changes ( along with the footage in this video) are rather exciting
Good, I hate the wolf turn. Everyone does it so it gets boring.
i hope we see more flares, peng pengs were always stunning!
Her flairs were to die for. I'm so glad she stuck with it in college too.
Still need the E cap lifted on uneven bars transitions...
Excited for the flares and circles coming back!
i really miss those elements on beam so it will be nice if they come back
Really excited to see flares being admitted as turns
Oh No. Sanne's turn series will be useless. Sad
Ugh...I can’t stand the rolls on beam
I think circles on beam are hideous.
isnt this code till dec 2025?
👍 bringing back creativity!!!
I think that the gymnast should wear a different kind of leotard now I know one of the countries had a leotard that had like I don't know like shorts or little bit of a length and somebody said that Simone biles was jealous when she saw the saw the other team war just with all the crazy things going on up there in this day and age I just really think they should change there I don't know two more appropriate leotard to just Hi how are you okay
Especially with the Larry Nassir Scandal
If you could re-post with a little punctuation (and proof-reading), we would find it easier to understand what you were writing about. Thank you.
@@eileencollins8799 same I couldn’t understand at all
@@rosefritchman7829 Do You think that a unitard could stop a sexual depredator from their beheavior? The problem is in the perverts mind not in the clothes.
@@rosefritchman7829 Predators are predators. It has NOTHING to do with what someone wears. He abused athletes in other college sports as well. He even abused girls with their parents in the room. Swimmers and divers wear tiny suits, track athletes wear small shorts and tops... what a woman wears doesn't invite abuse. That said, I'm happy to see they can wear leos or unitards or whatever makes them comfortable.
This channel has given me such a huge appreciation for vintage gymnastics.
"No more back-to-back turns"
*Sanne Wevers has left the chat*
I think they are cool 😎
So the Biles on beam score finally got upgraded 🙄
And cut the jazz hands!
I like all the rule changes, especially the roll, flairs, requirement. It adds a dimension. I think they need to encourage this diversity. I think forward tumbling on beam is the most interesting new things. Walk over front, aerial walkover to front. I would love to see and actually handspring front,
no more sitspins, please do more bielmanns on balance beam, that should be worth a super high amount of points!!!!