Great video I’m in the market for an ultra wide monitor I only need it for productivity I won’t be going w the dell only for one reason customer support is a nightmare ‼️‼️‼️‼️ Anything but a Dell 😖😫 What are your thoughts on lg ultrawide 49”? Thanks for the review
Thank you for this video, you just made my decision easier. I also hope they (1) both have loudspeakers, (2) device/remote to quickly switch between connected inputs and/or (3) ability to display two systems side by side
i recently purchased the Samsung CHG90 and I'm not yet impressed with it. I returned to Best Buy today to order a better CPU (which wont arrive until 10 days from now) but after viewing your video, I think I'll shop around for Dell.
Wow...this is old, but I ended up buying both the Dell and the Samsung. I got the dell which cost around $1100.00 and it worked well for work, but when it came to gaming...no can do. I already have 2 Alienware 25" gaming monitors and one went bad. The AW's are 1080 and 240hz refresh 1ms response time. I returned the Dell and bought the Samsung for $899. I must say, the Samsung needed some tweaking for productivity, but gaming it works flawless. Its not as good as my AW but way better than the dell.
The question is how well does the Dell or other upcoming QuadHD 32:9 monitors display the 1080p based res of the older models. Some users may enjoy the full res desktop experience but for gaming seek to go with the lower res (if the monitor scales well)?
what would you recommend for a side monitor for running and viewing multiple windows at once. For instance I game on a 27" monitor which i find to be the perfect size for me when it comes to gaming. a 49 inch monitor would be the monitor i use to have open my stream software, chat windows, and web browsing. I'm currently using a 27 inch monitor as my production monitor and have to switch between tabs to view different windows during a stream which is a pain. Being able to have 2-3 windows up and running in view at the same time is the utmost importance. Also would be using it for work in video editing and photoshop creation
HI. Tanks for this video in the first place!. I was debating on these two brands. I am more inclined towards the Dell bcse I need it for productivity ( excel and business apps) but maybe my bf will be more inclined to the Samsung for the gaming and the price too. I wonder which one is better for eye strain? I spend 8-10 hrs daily in front of the computer and my eyesight is not very good. I appreciate your answer.Thanks
Looking forward to anyone answer to your question as I'm actually also debating between the curve of the Samsung CRG9 or Philips on one side and the LG and Dell on other side.
What is the minimum required GPU to use these monitors please, without hurting your eyes, nor experiencing tearing nor stuttering? Let's just say use case is for everyday office work use, not gaming... will it need the 12GB RAM of Titan GPUs?
If you'r not gaming you won't need a expensive GPU, but if you do then go for a GTX 1070 or a RTX 2060, that's the bare minimum for a smooth experience imo. Also for tearing and stuttering i bet at that price these screen have freesync or gsync so no problem here.
Also VA has contrast is around 3000, and IPS is below 1000. The above Dell has less than 700. Colors, specially gradients, looks (much) better on high contrast monitors.
The viewing angle is nearly identical at the most extremes which is a pointless experiment to begin with because who the fuck sits at those angles. Also the panel doesn't guarantee colour accuracy vs another, its a general guidline but in this case im not sure which is better but the Samsung has crazy good accuracy with well above average in each Gamma category and I believe true 10 bit colour not 8 bit frc which is crazy good on top of HDR content from console games and films that have a lot of support even if it is the lower tier HDR, its still really good on this size of a monitor with the rest of the specs. Also IPS gets backlight bleeding which is likely over time if used for gaming which for 150% of Samsungs price is not something you want to really be purchasing. The Dell has 1 strength over the Samsung, and its for top end editing for picture detail so long as your only using the half screen resolution at which point you should ask yourself...... "Why not just buy a 4k, 5k or 8k 29 inch monitor if its truly that important like a job or something. Samsungs is the better all around and better gaming that also offers that immersion that a smaller monitor doesn't provide. It has a place in the market unlike the dell tbh.
nice review, Thanks for that! i´m still not shure wich i gonna buy. I like gaming but also seeking for a Monitor for my Homeoffice... Also as an Musician i like the new format because it give me more Space for my DAW (e.g. Steinberg Cubase) Greetings from Germany and keep going Aleks
What laptop are you powering this with? I'm considering purchasing one of these for use with a Dell XPS 15, but I'm unsure as to whether the laptop can drive the Dell UltraSharp 49" at the full 60hz
For anyone looking to do this. I did it and it worked just fine. Turns out the total number of pixels in this 49" behemoth is actually less than a standard size 4k monitor, which the XPS can also drive just fine.
What if the requirements are both (Professional/business oriented & gaming as well), which one to go for without keeping the price as a factor ? And which ultrawide or immersive gaming monitor do you suggest according to you ? (Obviously keeping price not as an deciding factor)
Probably the Dell? I really like refresh rate and HDR are the Samsung but if you're going to be seriously doing work, the Samsung's low (for its size) pixel count might get to you. And it's not like the Dell looks bad in games. 60Hz V-Sync isn't the end of the world.
I have the samsung personally but thats because i enjoy gaming as a past time more than anything, if you're serieus about getting better productivity out of it with 60hz gaming on the side go for the dell. If you, however, don't really care about text sharpness and know your way around the sharpness control (build into the samsing monitor ui at the very least) you can turn up the sharpness all the way and slightly make the windows and other program ui smaller through the windows interface to mimic what you would see on the dell with perphaps some jaggy lines here and there if we are talking about text. Spending less money helps as well.
I'd much prefer something in the 34-36 inch range for Ultra wide....after that it doesn't make any sense or even look reasonable strictly outside of Video or audio production.
Very good review! Thanks took most of all the guess work out of making the decision. Problem is I want the res. of the Dell but the price and refresh rate of the Samsung. Think I like the curve too of the Samsung but that alone wouldn't be a deal breaker. So, which one would I buy? Still undecided, Monitor would mainly be used for work. Just think the 33% increase in price for the DELL is a deal killer, I actually want two stacked, no now we are talking huge cost differences! Thanks again for a great review!
i currently own the samsung super ultra wide and ill tell you this, coming from a 1440p monitor, the 1080p resolution really really bothers me. I dont care what anyone says, HDR, refresh rate, etc doesnt matter if you can physically see the pixels on the screen, even when viewing from a distance. I thought it wouldn't be noticeable while gaming but if i had the choice i would go back to my 3440 x 1440 monitor and just play at 60hz. 1080 on a 49 inch monitor just isnt enough!! only get this monitor if you need the 144hz
No reason to get freesync when amd cards are so far behind. And i would never get a 1080p res, after gaming on higher. I would wait for a least 1440p with gsync or the new line of amd cards. I would also wait for true hdr of at least 1000 nits. Shame that monitors are so far behind tv's right now.
I do agree FreeSync is just kind of ok...Nvidia cards are definitely what most people buy. But if it had G-Sync they'd probably start at $1,500. Still have to make compromises, I guess.
@@SmidgenPC having had both a gtx1080 and a vega 64 I would disagree. In most games the 1080 has no more than 5 maybe 10 frames on the vega 64 at best. In others the vega has higher FPS. The Vega is especially good at 1440p gaming. There fairly well matched. Through in the savings you get on a freesync monitor vs gsync and price to performance goes to AMD.
AMD are not really that far behind. They're better value, they have open source drivers for Linux (if you're into that), and I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they overtake NVidia. Regardless, nothing wrong with AMD.
Lol and monitors being behind TV's too when talking about Nvidia so from a gamers perspective what a mong. TV's have size and highlighted colour on slower images oh and they are harder to nick because of the weight, thats about it.
Same decision here ... Amazon Offer on Monday do the rest for me: bought the Samsung CHG90 for 779€ ... the LG is fine, but I have to replace my 34“ UltraWide LG34UM95 AND my 144Hz Gaming Monitor (FullHD, 27“ Curved) with one Monitor.
"Widescreen" is the 16:9 ratio. "Ultrawide" is the 21:9 ratio. "Super Ultrawide" or sometimes "Super-wide" is the 32:9 ratio. If you can't even get the basic terminology correct for the title of your video, why would anybody listen to anything else you have to say? Honestly ...
Wait little while and Samsung: Content truly comes alive on the CRG9, with dual QHD resolution (5120×1440) and HDR10 with a peak brightness of 1,000 nits, providing superfine detail in the brightest and the darkest parts of an image. HDR10 delivers outstanding local dimming, and high-contrast HDR offers advanced spectacular highlights not available in non-HDR monitors.
I mean, just looking at the two monitors behind the guy side by side, without the knowledge of the resolution the DELL screen looks really bad by comparison. The Samsung is so much brighter with better contrast. The DELL screen looks washed out. Looks like I would never actually see a true black.
I got 2x Dell U4919DW for stocks trading. I also tried Samsung in the past. Dell and Samsung target different users based resolution vs refresh rate. For the business, I would say Dell is the best.
You do realize that color adjusting is a thing? Both Windows and the monitors themselves support for changing the contrast, hue etc. to your likings. There is no reason to leave it on the standard settings if they dont fit you.
OLED in computer monitor does not make sense. Graphics may looks greate but not the rests. And who is going to set infront of OLED hrs and hrs facing heat reflection.
No you can´t, at least at native resolution. If you change resolution it allows to switch to full screen but if you are on 5120x1440p the video will be shown just in the middle of the screen as 27". I do not know why and how to fix it, but it is this way.
LOL...Samsung had some major skipping and tearing from what I saw maybe they didn't have a decent GPU....which being Digital Trends doesn't make sense ...but oh well
@@MarketAndChurch its extremely important for him to list it as 3840 because people new to 49 inch ultrawides may believe it has the same horizontal resolution as a 34 inch ultrawide
FPS gaming should not be had on anything over 27” IMO. For myself I built and $8,000 work station that I make money off of but it just so happens that the thing can game and stream like a boss. I have an ASUS ROG PG279Q for gaming and then the Dell U4919DW for workstation tasks. The entire setup allows me to pretty much run the entire adobe suite at the same time and render quickly while keeping my desk space not cramped or cluttered with a nice office aesthetic.
Simon Drysdale lol if career tools are a flex. I don’t spend large amounts of money unless I’m making a profit back. Which is why I drive an average car, where average clothes, and live an average life style. I’m not “up” financially enough for me to feel comfortable spending money on luxury items just because
Give me a Gsync wariant and ill buy it imidietly , Freesync montiors run on AMD , and nobody who plays high end gaming system, uses AMD, cose AMDs best cards are not up to the task of running a monitor with resoluution same as having 2x 1440p monitors
Great video
I’m in the market for an ultra wide monitor
I only need it for productivity
I won’t be going w the dell only for one reason
customer support is a nightmare ‼️‼️‼️‼️
Anything but a Dell 😖😫
What are your thoughts on lg ultrawide 49”?
Thanks for the review
What‘s about the Philips 499P9H in comparison to these two 49’‘ monitors?
Have you ever compared the Samsung CHG90 to the Asus XG49VQ?
Thank you for this video, you just made my decision easier. I also hope they (1) both have loudspeakers, (2) device/remote to quickly switch between connected inputs and/or (3) ability to display two systems side by side
I got Samsung for $800 on Cyber Monday. It's still $880 on 12/12/2019
i recently purchased the Samsung CHG90 and I'm not yet impressed with it. I returned to Best Buy today to order a better CPU (which wont arrive until 10 days from now) but after viewing your video, I think I'll shop around for Dell.
U'd better consider CRG9 new samsung monitor
Wow...this is old, but I ended up buying both the Dell and the Samsung. I got the dell which cost around $1100.00 and it worked well for work, but when it came to gaming...no can do. I already have 2 Alienware 25" gaming monitors and one went bad. The AW's are 1080 and 240hz refresh 1ms response time. I returned the Dell and bought the Samsung for $899. I must say, the Samsung needed some tweaking for productivity, but gaming it works flawless. Its not as good as my AW but way better than the dell.
The question is how well does the Dell or other upcoming QuadHD 32:9 monitors display the 1080p based res of the older models.
Some users may enjoy the full res desktop experience but for gaming seek to go with the lower res (if the monitor scales well)?
Thank you for the review. I`m Not a gamer. Really want one for productivity, stock trading etc. Dell U4919 vs Samsung crg9? Advice please........
Great video. Thanks for the comparison!
I would go for the Dell Ultrasharp 49. But if it would be a model that is as wide but at least 30% higher that would be even better
Then the aspeect ratio will not be 32:9, it would be 32:12 lets say.
what would you recommend for a side monitor for running and viewing multiple windows at once. For instance I game on a 27" monitor which i find to be the perfect size for me when it comes to gaming. a 49 inch monitor would be the monitor i use to have open my stream software, chat windows, and web browsing. I'm currently using a 27 inch monitor as my production monitor and have to switch between tabs to view different windows during a stream which is a pain. Being able to have 2-3 windows up and running in view at the same time is the utmost importance. Also would be using it for work in video editing and photoshop creation
Thanks for the video. Well done.
HI. Tanks for this video in the first place!. I was debating on these two brands. I am more inclined towards the Dell bcse I need it for productivity ( excel and business apps) but maybe my bf will be more inclined to the Samsung for the gaming and the price too. I wonder which one is better for eye strain? I spend 8-10 hrs daily in front of the computer and my eyesight is not very good. I appreciate your answer.Thanks
Looking forward to anyone answer to your question as I'm actually also debating between the curve of the Samsung CRG9 or Philips on one side and the LG and Dell on other side.
What is the minimum required GPU to use these monitors please, without hurting your eyes, nor experiencing tearing nor stuttering?
Let's just say use case is for everyday office work use, not gaming... will it need the 12GB RAM of Titan GPUs?
If you'r not gaming you won't need a expensive GPU, but if you do then go for a GTX 1070 or a RTX 2060, that's the bare minimum for a smooth experience imo. Also for tearing and stuttering i bet at that price these screen have freesync or gsync so no problem here.
Very important to note, Dell has IPS compared to Samsung has VA panel.
Oh rly ? And by that u are implying what ?
IPS has better accuracy, color, viewing angle than VA panel. Unfortunately, VA has higher refresh rates than IPS.
Also VA has contrast is around 3000, and IPS is below 1000. The above Dell has less than 700. Colors, specially gradients, looks (much) better on high contrast monitors.
The viewing angle is nearly identical at the most extremes which is a pointless experiment to begin with because who the fuck sits at those angles.
Also the panel doesn't guarantee colour accuracy vs another, its a general guidline but in this case im not sure which is better but the Samsung has crazy good accuracy with well above average in each Gamma category and I believe true 10 bit colour not 8 bit frc which is crazy good on top of HDR content from console games and films that have a lot of support even if it is the lower tier HDR, its still really good on this size of a monitor with the rest of the specs.
Also IPS gets backlight bleeding which is likely over time if used for gaming which for 150% of Samsungs price is not something you want to really be purchasing.
The Dell has 1 strength over the Samsung, and its for top end editing for picture detail so long as your only using the half screen resolution at which point you should ask yourself...... "Why not just buy a 4k, 5k or 8k 29 inch monitor if its truly that important like a job or something.
Samsungs is the better all around and better gaming that also offers that immersion that a smaller monitor doesn't provide. It has a place in the market unlike the dell tbh.
nice review, Thanks for that! i´m still not shure wich i gonna buy. I like gaming but also seeking for a Monitor for my Homeoffice... Also as an Musician i like the new format because it give me more Space for my DAW (e.g. Steinberg Cubase)
Greetings from Germany and keep going
Aleks
What laptop are you powering this with? I'm considering purchasing one of these for use with a Dell XPS 15, but I'm unsure as to whether the laptop can drive the Dell UltraSharp 49" at the full 60hz
For anyone looking to do this. I did it and it worked just fine. Turns out the total number of pixels in this 49" behemoth is actually less than a standard size 4k monitor, which the XPS can also drive just fine.
I just picked up the Samsung at Best Buy at for 825
Would a 1070ti advance binned be able to run these monitors for video editing?
What if the requirements are both (Professional/business oriented & gaming as well), which one to go for without keeping the price as a factor ?
And which ultrawide or immersive gaming monitor do you suggest according to you ? (Obviously keeping price not as an deciding factor)
Probably the Dell? I really like refresh rate and HDR are the Samsung but if you're going to be seriously doing work, the Samsung's low (for its size) pixel count might get to you. And it's not like the Dell looks bad in games. 60Hz V-Sync isn't the end of the world.
I have the samsung personally but thats because i enjoy gaming as a past time more than anything, if you're serieus about getting better productivity out of it with 60hz gaming on the side go for the dell. If you, however, don't really care about text sharpness and know your way around the sharpness control (build into the samsing monitor ui at the very least) you can turn up the sharpness all the way and slightly make the windows and other program ui smaller through the windows interface to mimic what you would see on the dell with perphaps some jaggy lines here and there if we are talking about text. Spending less money helps as well.
Can someone compare the Phillips and the LG 49" with the 2 Dell and Samsung for video and photo work thank you
I'd much prefer something in the 34-36 inch range for Ultra wide....after that it doesn't make any sense or even look reasonable strictly outside of Video or audio production.
Very good review! Thanks took most of all the guess work out of making the decision. Problem is I want the res. of the Dell but the price and refresh rate of the Samsung. Think I like the curve too of the Samsung but that alone wouldn't be a deal breaker. So, which one would I buy? Still undecided, Monitor would mainly be used for work. Just think the 33% increase in price for the DELL is a deal killer, I actually want two stacked, no now we are talking huge cost differences! Thanks again for a great review!
Which one did you go with, I’m debating now
Check out Samsung C49RG90 - basically the same as this one but with 5120x1440 resolution, "5k"
i currently own the samsung super ultra wide and ill tell you this, coming from a 1440p monitor, the 1080p resolution really really bothers me. I dont care what anyone says, HDR, refresh rate, etc doesnt matter if you can physically see the pixels on the screen, even when viewing from a distance. I thought it wouldn't be noticeable while gaming but if i had the choice i would go back to my 3440 x 1440 monitor and just play at 60hz. 1080 on a 49 inch monitor just isnt enough!! only get this monitor if you need the 144hz
I'm using Logic Pro X, Cubase and SketchUp so which monitor would I choose?
Roz Don dell，because video or music studio use dell usually，it is like you choose audio monitor，Yamaha n 10，噢人genelic，not choose LG OR SAMSUNG
you didnt event mention there is no speaker or audio jack!!!! how do you do a review without mentioning that!
I ended up going for the Dell since it's only 1175 on Amazon right now.
You did a mistake then, since Samsung CRG9 came out! Sorry
No reason to get freesync when amd cards are so far behind. And i would never get a 1080p res, after gaming on higher. I would wait for a least 1440p with gsync or the new line of amd cards. I would also wait for true hdr of at least 1000 nits. Shame that monitors are so far behind tv's right now.
I do agree FreeSync is just kind of ok...Nvidia cards are definitely what most people buy. But if it had G-Sync they'd probably start at $1,500. Still have to make compromises, I guess.
@@SmidgenPC having had both a gtx1080 and a vega 64 I would disagree. In most games the 1080 has no more than 5 maybe 10 frames on the vega 64 at best. In others the vega has higher FPS. The Vega is especially good at 1440p gaming. There fairly well matched. Through in the savings you get on a freesync monitor vs gsync and price to performance goes to AMD.
AMD are not really that far behind. They're better value, they have open source drivers for Linux (if you're into that), and I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they overtake NVidia. Regardless, nothing wrong with AMD.
Your face right now when Nvidia announced they will start supporting Freesync, starting with the 2060.
Lol and monitors being behind TV's too when talking about Nvidia so from a gamers perspective what a mong. TV's have size and highlighted colour on slower images oh and they are harder to nick because of the weight, thats about it.
One of these or LG 43UD79 what would you choose?
Same decision here ... Amazon Offer on Monday do the rest for me: bought the Samsung CHG90 for 779€ ... the LG is fine, but I have to replace my 34“ UltraWide LG34UM95 AND my 144Hz Gaming Monitor (FullHD, 27“ Curved) with one Monitor.
"Widescreen" is the 16:9 ratio. "Ultrawide" is the 21:9 ratio. "Super Ultrawide" or sometimes "Super-wide" is the 32:9 ratio.
If you can't even get the basic terminology correct for the title of your video, why would anybody listen to anything else you have to say? Honestly ...
What about ps4 pro 32:9 screen ratio support ???
The real question is: why are Dell and ViewSonic monitors kept out of Best Buy by Asian companies to limit competition?
Wait little while and Samsung:
Content truly comes alive on the CRG9, with dual QHD resolution (5120×1440) and HDR10 with a peak brightness of 1,000 nits, providing superfine detail in the brightest and the darkest parts of an image. HDR10 delivers outstanding local dimming, and high-contrast HDR offers advanced spectacular highlights not available in non-HDR monitors.
When is the release date?
What if i have a 55* 1080p TV?, is it worth to switch to ultrawide?.
For gaming, yes. Monitors are better, regular tv's is handicapping yourself in terms of gaming.
I mean, just looking at the two monitors behind the guy side by side, without the knowledge of the resolution the DELL screen looks really bad by comparison. The Samsung is so much brighter with better contrast. The DELL screen looks washed out. Looks like I would never actually see a true black.
I got 2x Dell U4919DW for stocks trading. I also tried Samsung in the past. Dell and Samsung target different users based resolution vs refresh rate. For the business, I would say Dell is the best.
You wouldn't see a true black on either as they're not OLED.
You do realize that color adjusting is a thing? Both Windows and the monitors themselves support for changing the contrast, hue etc. to your likings. There is no reason to leave it on the standard settings if they dont fit you.
OLED in computer monitor does not make sense. Graphics may looks greate but not the rests. And who is going to set infront of OLED hrs and hrs facing heat reflection.
You are right.. and the color looks more beautiful in Samsung than Dell
I think samsung is more for gamers and the dell for stock traders
will youtube movies come out right on that 49" screen?
That's up to the uploader.
Wish there was a 1440 144 hz ultrawide. Maybe in a few years with better hardware. Fingers crossed
There's an ASUS ROG 49 1080 144Hz. I'm waiting for the same thing. I'm rocking the ASUS ROG 34" ultrawide right now.
This isnt "Ultrawide", this is "Super Ultrawide". Ultrawide is 21:9, often 35 inches. Super Ultrawide is 32:9.
I want the samsung with the resolution of the dell and with g-sync
One day, padawan.
@@xpusostomos That day has arrived, a couple days ago actually.
@@MarketAndChurch I haven't heard of any 49" with g-sync announced, albeit nvidia seems to be saying freesync is ok now.
@@xpusostomos that's what I meant. The new Samsung 49-inch comes with the Dell's 1440p, @144hz, and Nvidia cards will soon be able to use Freesync.
@@MarketAndChurch Thank you for the update. Crould you please provide the model number of this new samsung 1440p resolution monitor?
Samsung
같은 사진, 같은 동영상 재생시 화질차를 비교했으면 좋았을거같다더불어 가독성 비교도 하면 더 좋았을거같다
I stopped watching when you said 60hz thanks ❤
Dell for business use.
Explain please
@@HenryEIje because the text quality is a bit higher on the dell
0:47 3840 not 3440
can you watch youtube videos on Dell 49"?
No, the thought police come to your door if you try that.
@@xpusostomos aaahaaaaahahaah i hate you 😂
No you can´t, at least at native resolution. If you change resolution it allows to switch to full screen but if you are on 5120x1440p the video will be shown just in the middle of the screen as 27". I do not know why and how to fix it, but it is this way.
LOL...Samsung had some major skipping and tearing from what I saw maybe they didn't have a decent GPU....which being Digital Trends doesn't make sense ...but oh well
SAMSUNG CHG 90 IS 3840 X 1080 resolution , either the guy is not doing the homework or completely missed out
It's still a 1080p monitor. The Dell is 1440p.
@@MarketAndChurch its extremely important for him to list it as 3840 because people new to 49 inch ultrawides may believe it has the same horizontal resolution as a 34 inch ultrawide
The first major point is not fucking resolution its hdr. Do the video again!
this dude high af has to be
FPS gaming should not be had on anything over 27” IMO. For myself I built and $8,000 work station that I make money off of but it just so happens that the thing can game and stream like a boss. I have an ASUS ROG PG279Q for gaming and then the Dell U4919DW for workstation tasks. The entire setup allows me to pretty much run the entire adobe suite at the same time and render quickly while keeping my desk space not cramped or cluttered with a nice office aesthetic.
weird flex but ok
Simon Drysdale lol if career tools are a flex. I don’t spend large amounts of money unless I’m making a profit back. Which is why I drive an average car, where average clothes, and live an average life style. I’m not “up” financially enough for me to feel comfortable spending money on luxury items just because
Get a Dell 8K. It has more pixels than both of these suckers combined.
Dell 8K is only 32 inch. Graphics looks great but what about the fonts. Is 8K a business monitor?
Tell me what content supports 8k
I ended up getting two 49 inch dell. With total Realestate of 5120 x2880
99% of people don't have an 8K capable graphics card. Pointless comment.
Samsung would win. Price.....
Samsung looks a lot better!
Theres not any content for it waa wasas because of people like you!
The color reproduction of the samsung are jawdroping u need a slight tune and the QLED does the rest. Ips adios
Give me a Gsync wariant and ill buy it imidietly , Freesync montiors run on AMD , and nobody who plays high end gaming system, uses AMD, cose AMDs best cards are not up to the task of running a monitor with resoluution same as having 2x 1440p monitors
These monitors are stupid long. They need to be taller. So much wasted void beneath it
Actually you can simulate dual monitor on them.
For gaming, making it taller would change what you see (as in, you'd see less). That's just the way these games work.