Can Big Ten Remove Underperforming Conference Football Schools?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 มี.ค. 2024
  • Would the Big Ten ever cast aside its underperforming football schools? Everything regarding college sports has been about expansion. Could the Big 10 kick out schools like Indiana, Purdue, or Rutgers? Would the SEC kick out a school like Vanderbilt? The lower performing schools are not in a position to win championships and they don't bring in as much revenue or garner big TV ratings like some of their more popular counterparts. Yet, they still collect $75-100 million dollars a year from their respective conference media deals. It's something to ponder in the future but we will look at it today.
    CAITLIN CLARK
    Caitlin Clark and the Iowa Hawkeyes are like rock stars everywhere they go and they are battle tested and ready for just about anything they face in the NCAA Tournament. ALMOST, anything. Tune in to find out more.
    QUARTERBACK QUESTIONS
    Spring football is under way and power houses Ohio State and Michigan have big questions at quarterback. In fact, both schools have new coordinators and a slew of young signal-callers to choose from. So we will take a look at each situation.
    Plus, Craig Shemon's Locked on Big 10 will look at the final weekend of the men's basketball regular season and make our picks!
    Connect on Twitter: / talkbig10
    Website & Merch: talkbig10.com
    Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms…
    🎧 link.chtbl.com/LOBig10
    Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More
    🎧 linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege
    📢 Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!
    Amazon Fire TV
    Fire TV recently created Fire TV Channels to deliver a constant supply of the latest videos from your favorite sports brands, all for free. That includes all of us at Locked On and most of the big pro leagues and college conferences as well. To Learn More, visit www.amazon.com/LockedOnFireTV
    Nissan
    Our friends at Nissan have a lineup of SUV’s with the capabilities to take your adventure to the next level. Take the Nissan Rogue, Nissan Pathfinder, or Nissan Armada and go find your next big adventure. Shop NissanUSA.com.
    LinkedIn
    These days every new potential hire can feel like a high stakes wager for your small business. That’s why LinkedIn Jobs helps find the right people for your team, faster and for free. Post your job for free at LinkedIn.com/lockedoncollege. Terms and conditions apply.
    Gametime
    Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDON for $20 off your first purchase.
    FanDuel
    New customers, join today and you’ll get ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS in BONUS BETS if your first bet of FIVE DOLLARS or more wins. Visit FanDuel.com/LOCKEDON to get started.
    eBay Motors
    With all the parts you need at the prices you want, it’s easy to turn your car into the MVP and bring home that win. Keep your ride-or-die alive at EbayMotors.com. Eligible items only. Exclusions apply. eBay Guaranteed Fit only available to US customers.
    FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN)
    #Collegefootball #collegefootballbusiness #expansion #Tvrevenue #ConferenceRealignment #NIL #Big10 #Bigten #SEC #CaitlinClark #Iowa #MichiganFootball #OhioStateFootball
  • กีฬา

ความคิดเห็น • 147

  • @JeffreyW67
    @JeffreyW67 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    To quote "The Incredibles": "If everyone is super, then no one is super."
    If you have a conference full of Michigan's, then odds are all your teams will be around .500. The powerful schools do need some other teams to rack up those wins against. And sometimes, you'll get an upset or two. And every now and then, you'll get one of the "lesser" schools on a run for the championship or a high-end bowl game. That is what makes college football fun.

    • @hypnosemblem8829
      @hypnosemblem8829 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Big12 has that problem currently, though they aren't at the level of michigans, they all are at practically the same level with the exception of like 1 or 2 teams.

  • @user-wp3cy3fl2j
    @user-wp3cy3fl2j 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Those weaker schools give the Big Ten a presence in their area and that helps with the conferences recruiting reach.

  • @richardoneal1055
    @richardoneal1055 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Do it. The B10 will be the best two-team conference in FBS.
    Always been a two team conference since I've been following college football in the early 1960s.

    • @A1Googler
      @A1Googler 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Big Ten hasnt always been a 2 team conference. Ohio State isntba founding member. WTF are you talking about

    • @Gregcarver-yy9ts
      @Gregcarver-yy9ts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@A1Googler He never said OSU was a founding school, learn to read before you hate. Dolt

  • @VorlonAngel
    @VorlonAngel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Can Big Ten Remove Underperforming Conference Football Schools?" Seriously? Based on recent performance, they would eliminate Illinois, Nebraska, Indiana, Purdue, Rutgers, etc. Pretty much most of the entire BIG-west and all but three of the BIG-east (MI, OSU, Penn St.).

    • @catfeline1530
      @catfeline1530 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When you think about it, that's probably why all these schools were put in the B10 West (llinois, Nebraska, Indiana, Purdue, Rutgers)? It's basically a list of schools that are going to be jettisoned off as B10 brings in more successful teams from the West coast. The B10 west will have to either join other minor conferences or form their own conference, minus all the lucrative TV contracts.

    • @larrychannell7056
      @larrychannell7056 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are are full of poop @vorlonAngel

  • @telloboi
    @telloboi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why does everyone come for Rutgers? They actually put football first and what to be a power. Indiana, Purdue, Maryland, Illinois and NW been getting B10 checks for decades. Rutgers just got there .

    • @mauallison7755
      @mauallison7755 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maryland just got there also, remember when they entered with them, and mostly beats Rutgers.

    • @fecat93
      @fecat93 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      NU has 2 division titles and 5 bowl wins since Rutgers arrived

    • @Carlucci4380
      @Carlucci4380 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fecat93wouldn’t have happened in the East division bro. Pound ur chest elsewhere

    • @mic1240
      @mic1240 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Purdue, the founding school of the BIG, has a solid program, increased attendance, many bowl seasons, most NFL QBs as any school in US. Rutgers is no where near Purdue in football. Indiana has the worst record in all NCAA history.

    • @fecat93
      @fecat93 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mic1240 Northwestern only has a winning football record against a single early member -- Indiana, although we are almost even with Illinois.
      It used to be the Big 2 and the little 8. I think the "little 8" will consider any attack on one of them is an attack on all of them.

  • @charleskahl1586
    @charleskahl1586 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    There have to be some bottom feeders and having resources to fund better facilities will help these schools to rise. Northwestern is doing a major rebuild of their stadium and they are challenged by their academic admissions standards. No one can refute the prestige of a degree from Northwestern University. No one conference should have all powerhouse teams. The problem is that the NCAA allowed too many teams to advance to the top division.

    • @fecat93
      @fecat93 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No one would be forced out however I could imagine my school Northwestern leaving if football became too professional and the athletes weren't students any longer.

    • @gabeswitala2292
      @gabeswitala2292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@fecat93It's NW, not Stanford or UC Berkeley.

    • @fecat93
      @fecat93 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gabeswitala2292 By your usage of NW you clearly know nothing about Northwestern. Beyond that what are you implying?
      Berkeley is more of a bad football Michigan as they are politically/academically similar - public, leftist, and good academics.
      Stanford, Duke, Northwestern, Vanderbilt are very similar as the alumni, faculty, and administration have mixed feelings towards big $ athletics. I'm sure all considered following U of Chicago's lead at one time or another.

    • @gabeswitala2292
      @gabeswitala2292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @fecat93 My point is that Stanford hates FB and UC Berkeley hates all sports in general. But because of the revenue they generate they will forever hypocritically suckle on the teat of sports and FB revenue. NW doesn't hate their FB team.
      I wish the ACC would have left the two to their own athletic demise. It would have suited them right and gave them a healthy dose of justice.

    • @Patrick-sg7cm
      @Patrick-sg7cm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@gabeswitala2292the irony is, Cal and Stanford might still get left to their own demise if the ACC falls apart.

  • @user-dq7vd1mf3j
    @user-dq7vd1mf3j 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Look, yes, some of them suck. But, Ohio State has to have someone’s ass to kick. They can’t all be Alabama and Ohio State. The real beauty is this, Big10 schools get loads of credit for their reciting ratings. So the results on the field don’t really matter so much as long as they get the win. Getting the win requires some Purdue’s and North Westerns, along with some once great Nebraska’s and Penn States. Stack those wins and boom, respect. Put Alabama, Texas, OU, Georgia, OSU, Michigan, USC, PennState, Oregon, LSU in the same conference and that really is the big10. But… like I said, you have to have someone’s ass to kick.

    • @kevinchandler179
      @kevinchandler179 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Once great????? My Nittany Lions 🦁 in the same breath as Nebraska, you should get your comment card revoked!!!!! WE ARE 👍

  • @l.carlossimental6096
    @l.carlossimental6096 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Big Ten is not dumping any university. There are more considerations in play such as the conference as a whole being worth more than the individual universities in terms of athletic dollars. Also, football dollars is chump change compared to academic dollars. UCLA and Washington generates around $2 billion per year and USC over $1 billion per year in academic dollars. The Big Ten faculty and university presidents love this and it dramatically increases the heft of the Big Ten Academic Alliance. If anything, the Big Ten is holding two seats open; one for Norte Dame and another university (Stanford?) to preserve rivalries and increase academic prestige and football dollars. In short, football isn’t everything.

  • @jamesbond-fb9fp
    @jamesbond-fb9fp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    northwestern should go. add FSU. don't drop Purdue or Indiana unless we add Notre dame. Rutgers was never a good add.

  • @richardbarber462
    @richardbarber462 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Athletics revenue totals roughly $1 billion per year. That's a lot. Research revenue totals nearly $1 billion per year PER SCHOOL. Big Ten is tops and it isn't even close. Football guys won't have a say here, guaranteed.

    • @kevinchandler179
      @kevinchandler179 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your exactly right, and I guarantee you that my Nittany Lions 🦁, Ohio State, Michigan, Texas, Georgia, Bama, and LSU
      percentage wise are the big bad dogs that bring in the big bucks!!!! WE ARE

  • @rjhall6055
    @rjhall6055 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Now way bro. There’s no possible way you can regulate the non money makers to Peacock, BTN+, BTN…. It absolutely blows my mind to do that.
    Can you imagine OSU/USC on Peacock because the same presidents that voted on this deal, voted to kick out the teams that can take those time slots so everyone can $100 million…..

  • @Angrygumballl
    @Angrygumballl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Not this crap again. 😂

  • @swoesteban5570
    @swoesteban5570 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some schools are in the Big 10 because of reasons other than football.
    It has just recently reached to the west coast.
    All conferences have "bottom feeders".

  • @mrme8521
    @mrme8521 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This sounds nuts. Somebody has to loose for the other schools to make money.

  • @todddoyle2248
    @todddoyle2248 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Big10 will continue to expand, but will not get rid of any of their current members. At the end of the current contract i do believe they will have eliminate equal revenue shares, but the Indiana's and Rutgers of the league will still get way more than they would out of the other conferences.

  • @tomrippey5231
    @tomrippey5231 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t think they’ll ever get to 30. 24 max. However, they should put pressure on the teams to have a minimum recruiting budget or top 20 finishes across a number of sports.

  • @logsdon36
    @logsdon36 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They shouldn’t even consider it. This conference needs door mats

  • @TenaciousStudent
    @TenaciousStudent 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This narrative needs to end. No, B1G will not cur underperforming football schools. Reason being, those "underperforming" schools have been member institutions longer than Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State etc. Teams like Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota will side with those lower schools for multiple reasons. One being, if they get chopped, it increases the change they do. The other is, all of the top tier teams need those lower games to bolster their egos.

  • @user-wp3cy3fl2j
    @user-wp3cy3fl2j 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The conferences are already to big. At 18 schools the teams will barely see each other excepted for protected games. No real chance to build new rivalries and those games are the most exciting.

    • @fecat93
      @fecat93 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm hoping a sub conference forms with the original big ten. Put all the western schools in a pac division and the eastern schools in an eastern division.

  • @josephross7936
    @josephross7936 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reglation like Britsh soccer. A league & B league.

  • @fecat93
    @fecat93 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Only 5 continuous 1896 members UW NU IL PU MN. MI left and rejoined in 1917

  • @lindencamelback2305
    @lindencamelback2305 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No, as no team must be bad forever, and coaches and administrations both change and/or are replaced. Plus there is a history and familiarity in conferences.

  • @eskymo-sb3nq
    @eskymo-sb3nq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The founding members have their place in the big ten guaranteed, was part of the original agreement to expand. So basically your topic can't happen at least to the original 10 teams.

  • @angelobregon4564
    @angelobregon4564 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Craig, college conferences are going away soon. NFL and NBA regional conferences will emerge cuz it's about $$$$$$$$$$! So, you're not far off, but still missing the real model! Look for a blend with soccer, if you can't compete you're dropped and replaced by hot school. Ratings! That's the game! Angel USC'78

  • @JosephMelendrez007
    @JosephMelendrez007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rutgers deserves 50 million period.

  • @LogoTimeClark
    @LogoTimeClark 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    History and Tradition Matter. Did the Conference need to expand?, Yes. The additions made were all done to expand its reach. It is a true national Conference now. However, you don't relegate a historic member because of football history. The Conference probably needs Arizona and to add a Mountain time zone program. It probably needs a southern member for an even twenty.

  • @Patrick-sg7cm
    @Patrick-sg7cm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Big 12 would immediately swoop up the B1G rejects if the B1G kicks out any members.

  • @mikefredd3390
    @mikefredd3390 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Conference realignment feels like 1980’s cable bundling of something that should be about college sports not excellence based on business acumen.

  • @Ryan-vq5ur
    @Ryan-vq5ur 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rutgers is a decent QB away from being a pretty good football program. They would have finished 10-3 with a huge upset win over Ohio State if they had one last season.

  • @StevenClark-ss4fq
    @StevenClark-ss4fq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a reason a conference that has been around for more than 120 years has only one former member. The B1G will not kick anyone out!!!!!

  • @pnwadventurer802
    @pnwadventurer802 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's impossible for all teams to have winning records. There will always need to be the floormats so the good teams staying winning 😊

  • @gbrew839
    @gbrew839 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you kick out the patsies you’re left with about 6 teams

  • @morrissimmons
    @morrissimmons 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tier 1 college football is coming. Mega money is there. Rivalry, regions as well as marketing does not matter.

  • @rodharris3606
    @rodharris3606 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't forget that football brings in money but the money that the research money makes the football look like you live in the poor side of town, Northwestern and the rest bring in money too.

  • @jit6275
    @jit6275 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    None are getting kicked out. The top schools will leave to form a new conference. The Leaders or Legends or whatever and leave the Perdues or the world in the BIG. No litigation this way.

  • @JuanHernandez-rm5dm
    @JuanHernandez-rm5dm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Big Ten needs to dump Rutgers. Rutgers would probably get turned away from Conference USA.

  • @chucks1673
    @chucks1673 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Presidents make these decisions at the end of the day ..... how good is your med school matters more than your teams ...... research dollars ...... plus tradition .....however, if we had a worldwide depression? Ya never know ......... money and Title IX would rule the day.

  • @hutchings003
    @hutchings003 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NBC and espn will ultimately decide if the weak schools are removed. I’ve never watched a Rutgers game, no matter who they play, and I never will. Not entertaining in the least.

    • @gabeswitala2292
      @gabeswitala2292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This comment feels like a black person telling me what it's like to be white after they just tell me I have no idea what its like to be black.

  • @DuckRon626
    @DuckRon626 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So, to all those who poo-poo the idea of jettisoning lower level teams, answer me this. How often have you watched an Indiana-Purdue football game? Or, Northwestern-Illinois game? Or, any combination of those teams?

    • @joshgibson2318
      @joshgibson2318 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this comment indicates you didn’t attend a Big Ten school, or never attended one of those “bottom feeder” games. Well, if you had, you would understand what Big Ten culture and Big Ten schools are actually like. It is about tradition, and those rivalries do matter. Having witnessed Purdue beat MSU and OSU in person, multiple times, it’s awesome for students who go there. This guy is an idiot.

  • @georgeforbes4875
    @georgeforbes4875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the college presidents are putting it out there, you can take is seriously.
    More likely, a team would ask for unequal distribution first.

  • @rogermartinez8606
    @rogermartinez8606 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nebraska also

  • @jeffsbenningtonelkhornvall2207
    @jeffsbenningtonelkhornvall2207 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about ditching bottom feeder basketball programs while we're at it then. 🤣

  • @sumdude4281
    @sumdude4281 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Short answer NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. NW and ILL are the Chicago market. Illinois has one of the largest alum associations in the country and Chicago is full of alum. Ill has one of the best NIL programs in the country right now. Indiana and Purdue Indi TV market. MN Minneapolis. Not to mention the AAU research dollars and collaboration from an academic standpoint. Now let me flip it, some of these "bad football" schools lead the conference in basketball. The only legit drop might be Nebraska b/c what is their T.V. market and they aren't AAU?

    • @LockedOnBIG10
      @LockedOnBIG10  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching. Appreciate your take.

  • @ericblomquist1975
    @ericblomquist1975 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Easier just to cut their share of the revenue. That is DEFINATELY gonna happen.

    • @zplapplap
      @zplapplap 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I doubt it will ever happen. At the conference level, there will never be the votes. Destabilizing the conference in this way would be nothing short of idiotic.

  • @Preston_Prosper
    @Preston_Prosper 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Northwestern and Rutgers are the bottom no one would reject

  • @HankDavis
    @HankDavis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I get what you're saying, but every sport MUST have jobbers to beat up on. Why do you think big brand teams play the directional schools each year? Jobbers are worth having in the conference.

  • @maxheidlage8040
    @maxheidlage8040 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So does that mean that Nebraska would gwt the boot for theyre football performance? Ya i didnt think so.

    • @LockedOnBIG10
      @LockedOnBIG10  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody said that.

  • @heartbreak25
    @heartbreak25 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No. I'm a PSU fan who visits Northwestern once a month. If you don't know the value that Northwestern brings to the B1G then I don't know what to say.

    • @kevinchandler179
      @kevinchandler179 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I am a die hard Nittany Lions 🦁 fan, and I see what you are saying buddy, and agree 👍!!@ WE ARE

    • @tylerbrown2700
      @tylerbrown2700 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Big Ten Schools are flagship institutions. I really don't see the hate against smaller football schools. I think the conference is more about shared vision in athletes and research than purely money. They make huge amounts of money, but they aren't going to kick out Northwestern for a college with poor research and a solely football based culture.

  • @claytongardinier5179
    @claytongardinier5179 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Indiana is number thirteen in athletic revenue nationally and USC and UCLA don't even make the top 25.

    • @Preston_Prosper
      @Preston_Prosper 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indiana basketball is legendary

    • @cacogenicist
      @cacogenicist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USC doesn't report. It's a private school

  • @georgeforbes4875
    @georgeforbes4875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    How would the top schools beat their chest, before falling short in a playoff against an evenly-matched opponent?
    And good luck kicking a school out without plenty of litigation.

  • @MrEddiethedog
    @MrEddiethedog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Go Ducks!!!

  • @bishopmontel2
    @bishopmontel2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I knew this was coming

  • @wally8787
    @wally8787 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Do your homework. Northwestern and Purdue, as B1G charter members, are protected.
    Why replace schools? If the B1G voted Indiana and Rutgers off the island, the payout for the remaining schools would go up.

    • @dimitri1515
      @dimitri1515 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Plus it helps to have a handful of "easy" in-conference games for the top schools to play.

    • @dantesinfernopurgatory7826
      @dantesinfernopurgatory7826 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Rutgers is trending upward under Greg Schiano. As well as many sports across the board. A far cry from the dumpster fire of 10 years ago. It's also located in a prime recruiting area. I see Rutgers becoming a mid-tier to upper half of the mid-tier school.

    • @wally8787
      @wally8787 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dantesinfernopurgatory7826 It isn't about trends or wins. It is all about TV eyeballs aka $$$$.

    • @zplapplap
      @zplapplap 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What rights do charter members hold that Indiana and Iowa, for example, do not have (both of whom joined in 1899)?

    • @TenaciousStudent
      @TenaciousStudent 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Voting schools out just makes it possible for the next team up to be cut. It is all a stupid idea to begin with.

  • @eskymo-sb3nq
    @eskymo-sb3nq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maybe do some big ten research before going on TH-cam and wasting everyone's time

  • @justicefreedom4947
    @justicefreedom4947 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    😂😂 this guy has no clue about the foundation of the big ten. IU and Michigan are the pillars of the Big ten. Good luck with this ridiculous premise.

    • @eskymo-sb3nq
      @eskymo-sb3nq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Actually written in the bylaws that the original members cannot be expelled

    • @rjhall6055
      @rjhall6055 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      IU isn’t a founder, Purdue is though

    • @justicefreedom4947
      @justicefreedom4947 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rjhall6055 I said Pillars not founders. Very different.

    • @Sean180morris
      @Sean180morris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Iu should be in the sun belt

    • @ericmcdurmon8000
      @ericmcdurmon8000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It has nothing to do with wins and losses. It has to do with viewership. IU has a viewership which is greater than many of the other members. Also not everyone can have a winning record in a conference. There has to be teams that lose. If everyone is great then half the great teams lose each week. You don’t want your big brands losing half the time. You want competitive games, but still want the Big Brands to win. Indiana and Purdue fill that niche.

  • @scottlaux6934
    @scottlaux6934 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Inevitable.

  • @rogermartinez8606
    @rogermartinez8606 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No

  • @alta58043
    @alta58043 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haha you just knew this was next.

  • @carlosnuckols8470
    @carlosnuckols8470 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And The PAC-12 had better teams

  • @briggsofdisaster
    @briggsofdisaster 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Won't happen. Let's stop entertaining this.

  • @d.martin7692
    @d.martin7692 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All the monkeying around has caused me to lose interest.

  • @stevekelly9509
    @stevekelly9509 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Idiocy at its best

  • @A1Googler
    @A1Googler 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No, we are NOT kicking teams out of the Big Ten. Anyone suggesting such is a new fanboy far removed from what made this conference great.
    And this poster's comment on "pulling your own weight" is the height of ignorance. SOMEONE HAS TO LOSE. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. The reason this conference formed and has been as stable over 100+ years with revenue sharing is because these teams want to play each other.

  • @grobble8954
    @grobble8954 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol...

  • @johntarman3234
    @johntarman3234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Purdue should be the first to go.

    • @TenaciousStudent
      @TenaciousStudent 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They competed in the conference championship game two seasons ago. Their basketball program is the best in the conference. They have been a member institution longer than every top tier football school in the B1G. Don't be stupid.

  • @Chicagocity1717
    @Chicagocity1717 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kick rutgers and northwestern out…seriously they blow

  • @greghodgson7917
    @greghodgson7917 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly, dump Ohio state, can't beat an sec school if their life depended on it, look at the record, biggest disappointment in the big ten. For their place in the big ten hierarchy, truly the biggest disappointment. It's all relevant!

    • @gabeswitala2292
      @gabeswitala2292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lloyd Carr beat the sec as many times as Osuck has all-time

  • @jima5143
    @jima5143 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Get rid of the Fraud known as James Franklin and the Penn State pretenders...........

  • @lordrayden3045
    @lordrayden3045 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Big 10 used to pride itself on academics
    Then They pissed that away adding worthless Oregon

    • @tallfir2520
      @tallfir2520 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oregon is an AAU school with top-ranked faculty including Noble and Pullitzer Prize winners. Their research is top-notch: They are #1 among AAU schools in licensing/research dollars spent which is one good metric used to measure the importance of research generated. They just opened the first half of a new billion dollar research institute in Eugene and a half billion branch campus in Portland which will house law, architecture, and education students among others while generating additional research. The new research institute at Oregon has helped to generate 32 start-up companies with direct ties to the U of O, helping the state to a #3 ranking in innovation economy and business competitiveness. Oregon generates a 2.6 billion yearly return to the state of Oregon. You may be an osu beaver, your school left behind. For your own mental health, you need to stop obsessively disparaging Oregon on every site mentioning the Big-10 and Oregon. Oregon is moving onward and upward. You need to do likewise.

    • @lordrayden3045
      @lordrayden3045 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tallfir2520
      Yes it’s true, somehow Oregon hasn’t been tossed from the AAU
      They should be
      Any school thst spends more on athletics than research isn’t a serious school.
      Oregon is worthless to the big 10 and brings them down
      Spin it how you want, Oregon state has a better research profile than Oregon