Hey Q8Pilot - thanks for showing our product and your suggested configuration. As the dev of the FSLTL injector I'd like to just point out a couple of things that were not quite right. The 'Max Radius to inject Ground Aircraft' - this only affects the IFR injected traffic distance not the additional aircraft distance. This will mean with 150km set in busy airspace you will be injecting IFR traffic at all the surrounding airports. So with your KLAX example that could see a significant number of extra aircraft on the ground at other airports like KBUR, KSNA etc. In addition the 'Absolute Max Airline Parked' setting only impacts the static parked aircraft, not the IFR aircraft - so won't limit those aircraft on the ground that are true IFR aircraft. I suspect that is why you see a bigger drop at KLAX. With respect to Additional Parked Airline aircraft, a setting of 10 is equal to 50% (as opposed to 100% as noted in the video) of the overall suitable parking spaces with radius greater than 10m. The in air radius definitely won't have a direct impact on performance, other than potentially reducing the number of aircraft in the air if airspace isn't that busy. In KLAX region 100km or 150km air radius will often have the same performance impact as you will still hit your overall IFR limit if its prime flying time. (You would be able to see that from the IFR counter displayed in the console window) Personally I fly with 150km air and 30km ground radius - which for me gives the better experience. Final note is with respect to VFR traffic - VFR in FSLTL is an aircraft that has not origin or destination in FR24, or just one of them - i.e. we don't know the start and end point. In KLAX region you will see plenty of these flying if you monitor them on little nav map. We would definitely advise anyone to also review the user guide so they can read what each setting does in detail... www.fslivetrafficliveries.com/user-guide/
I'm not sure I agree that the performance you were experiencing was "good". In my mind, good performance in a simulator means smooth performance which equates to consistent frametimes across all loading scenarios (FL 350 or on the ground at a busy airport). Dropping from 64 fps to 44 fps during takeoff roll necessitates changes in frametimes which the eye experiences as stutters. Instead a better approach is to aim for a consistent frametime through frame rate limitation. Just my 2 cents.
The issue isn’t the CPU or GPU… it is the standard cache settings. Nvidia makes the cache 1 gig standard. I bumped min to 100 gig and deleted all current cache files… fixed stutter in all my VR games including MSFS.
Good video! I wish I could get the frame rates that you do. I have an I-9 processor with 32 gigs of RAM and the RTX 3080 card. I run either dx11 or dx12 and I have everything at Ultra. I'm lucky to get 35 to 40 frames per second and with FS LTL at the larger airports I will get some stuttering and a definite big-hitting framerate. But I do love fsltl. Thanks for explaining the settings a little bit more detailed. I will play around with them.
I feel your pain. Same setup as yours except 64GB RAM. I abandoned 4K in favor of VR, and have to tune it a lot, based on complexity/density of the airports and local terrain (objects). Vexing. Almost enough to make me go crazy.
You have everything on ultra with a 3080?? I have a 3070ti with 32g and i can barely get 30fps at mid-sized airports with low to ultra grapics... Sliders are only at 1/5th. I update my motherboard, graphics card and windows regularly. What am i doing wrong?
Over 60 fps at New York is a dream, i just got the 14900k ,64 gb ram @ 6400 Mhz, and 4 Tb Crucial T700. Currently with rtx 3090 ftw3 Ultra, waiting for new gpu other than 4090.
Hi Q8Pilot - a great video again thanks. Not sure why FSLTL has become such an FPS killer very recently. I have an i9 32GB Ram and RTX 2080 Super. At the freeware EGKK using FS Traffic with a setting of 20 flights per hour (so fairly full) I get an average FPS of 41. When I switch to FSLTL using a similar traffic load and using FS Traffic models as priority my FPS drops down to about 25 and stutters. I note that with FS Traffic I get a good balance between GPU and CPU however now with FSLTL I get constant red and solid limited by mainthread. Any ideas if something has changed with FSLTL?
You need to understand what a guide means. I am not suggesting you follow the settings here. This guide tells you what affects the FPS the most and how much it would tax your system. Please understand what a guide means. I
@@Q8Pilot I know but at 80+ FPS to start with you have plenty of room to play with. What about people with 30 or less FPS to start with? They cant even use this guide am i right?
Frame generation is on, but this has no relevance here. The relevance is how much FSLTL taxes your FPS and what settings will reduce the resource consumption.
Lag and stutter… if you don’t get it when you begin… but it shows up later in your flight, or when landing… Delete your rolling cache files in the general options, data... Frame rates go down because there is a bottle neck holding up the processor. Almost always… cache files. Also check your video card. They are saved in there. Change settings in the video card card settings for larger cache file to prevent overflow. Standard is 1 gig. Make it at least 10 gig. Mine is 100. No more stutters at maximum settings.if frame rates are good when you start up the sim… should be good the entire flight.
Do you mean delete rolling cache and turn it off or delete rolling cache and allow it to re-generate ? If the latter, how much rolling cache size do you set ?
This advice has always confused me, as I considered timing cache to be a theoretical speed enhancer. If it can bottleneck, then what's the point at all? Just saving data? Why not turn it off then?
Hello i see there is ai in the grund but very little when flying ,so how to maintain more ai traffic when flying ah ,i see usa is more but asia is very less
for me, the two worst thinks about msfs are the ai traffic and atc. i’m really keen to find good ways to improve both. GA is very important to me though, so i’m not sure this helps.
Thank you for demonstrating the product because I always use it now! It definitely was worth getting and is surprisingly very good as it's freeware and is even better than some other pay ware A.I Traffic addons.
I finally figured out what was really causing stutter and crashing my system after flying a little while. Check your Catche… delete it. In the sim, and and in the video card settings.
Hello sir, i've heard that it possible to set textures in fsltl in 2K, how to do that ? Apprently, the textures files in fsltl traffic base in community decrease from 40go to 9 go ! do you know how to set that ?
Hello, thanks for the video. I also installed it, however, I have noticed there are basically no 747 models at the (big) airports, just saw one from a parcel carrier at OMDB but none at other big airports. Is there a problem with or what am I doing wrong? I noticed I also did not see any in your video of JFK. Thanks for your help!
My game hardly gets 25 fps with no planes on the ground what so ever and i have a relatively decent pc nothing i do in graphics setting make a different i can turn everything low as possible and still lag and idk what to do and it’s frustrating
Hello, I have a good computer and antilising and anisitropic am maximum, but the airport buildings flicker and it has a strange effect, does this happen to you? how can i solve? It also happens with objects.
I still do not understand why I am, sitting at Teterboro regional airport, am seeing many more plane movements than Flightradar 24 shows, and I see Frontier and Delta Embraer Jets which are typical. Why does FSLTL not only show the really operating aircraft? AND - small planes are always moving about a plane lenght backwards before taxiing away.
@@Q8Pilot But why planes that do not use Teterboro? This airport is mainly for GA and Bizjet traffic that cannot use Newark or the two NYC megaports. Why should I see two Airbusses together? If this is so, FSTL is not that good, IMHO.
What happens if you speed simulation time in air?? does it affect other airplanes? How do they behave if they're direct mirror of Flightradar24? thanks!
Hello Q8 sir, i know this is a 2 month old video. But i was wondering if you can advise me if i should buy FS Traffic? Or FSLTL does a great AI traffic job already? What make FS traffic better that it'd cost 30$, sir?
Hi, Why does your GPU doesn't go full 100% load for max frames. I have the same problem on busy airports and scenery my GPU will backtrottling. Less processingpower of the GPU for more scenery will result in massive framedrops, just at the paces you need it the most. My CPU only uses around 40% Temps, Power internet speed and 32GB Ram and all on SSD wouldn't been a problem.
That's because your CPU does not have enough single thread performance. CPU itself also have a FPS counter, the optimal situation is CPU fps matches GPU fps. If one of these has less power, the other one will throttle down just as you said. Even though your CPU utilization shows only 40%, it is bottlenecked. The usage only tell you the capacity of CPU power in use, not its actual processing speed.
@@ati4280 in my case the CPU is more powerfull than the GPU. In the way off during FL2020 He uses like 30% of the CPU and why wouldn't he use then 100% op GPU. There is enough power left for the CPU to ramp up.
@ati4280 I am not that technically about how everything works. However my CPU With 32GB Ram has so much overcapacity that it only uses about 30% of the totall capacity of the chip. So when I play flightsimulator. Why if your GPU can go to 100%. Why does it happen called "GPU Throttling" that when you go to land and there is more to render that instead the GPU still uses about 100% what it normally does to give as much frames as possible. So if you are cruising the gpu us standard always about 90-100% But when de scenery gets heavy. Even with Rolling Cache and here in NL Glassfiber internet. Why if the CPU isn't doing that much that still the GPU is Throttling back to maybe 50%. So due to heavy scenery you always lose frames and especially if your card is working half you losing almost your whole experience. So far I can understand is your CPU has many Cores & Threads. And is FL2020 not optimalized to use as much cores as it can. I have 10 Cores. But do you mean it can maybe use only 6 of them so those are at 100% the rest only few per cent background so your gaming Threads are fully utilized however because the other Cores don't help the game you see that the complete utilization is less than 100 so you see maybe 40%. If this is the case. Why don't FL2020 don't use more Cores because there are far more expensive CPU's that have a lot more Cores and Threads. Am I right what I am writing here?
@@LennardA320 I totally understand your confusion, and I was confused years before. The bottleneck is rather complicated, cannot be explain clearly within one or two words. The CPU is used for scenery pre-rendering. It prepares all necessary stuffs before GPU kicks in. So, when heavy scenery in coming, or you start at large airport like Helsinki in your country, this makes CPU pretty hard to prepare all sceneries to match up the speed your GPU has. Speaking of speed, let's make it simple. You said you have 10 cores, I don't know what exactly model it is. I have a 6 core AMD CPU instead. More cores is something like more horsepower, but it doesn't mean you can go faster. E.g. M1A2 tank has more than 1000hp, but it cannot running at a speed of 300kph like a 400hp Porsche. You have more cores, but if your CPU is several years old and with a lower clock speed, that the possible reason you only see 40% usage. The reason for over 90% GPU loading while cruising is that when your altitude is high, there's less scenery processing demands unless you have high TLOD setting over like 200 TLOD. Yes, MSFS is not fully optimized for multi core, but it does use as many cores as possible to process sceneries and other stuffs. Keep this in mind, your FPS only bundle with the slowest hardware.
i’m struggling as when I land at a fairly busy single runway airport using fsltl I have to go around like 3-4 times before I can land due to everytime i’m on final a new plane enters the runway
Hello Q8Pilot. Thanks for the video. I'm having an issue with getting aircraft to show up. When I hit start the box comes up, I put N as I don't want to make any changes to the above settings, it connects to MSFS, but the only line I get is KJFK using max 40 additional parked aircraft, nothing else. When I go to the sim, I may get a few vehicles but no aircraft. My settings are as follows, 90, 0, 3, 0, 100, 150, 180, yes,yes,yes,no, no, FS traffic will be prioritized. Any suggestions, Thanks Robert
Well. I installed the FBW installer, installed the, A320-251N A32NX model, then the base models and then the FTLTL injector, all three items have a check mark on them.
Hey, did you happen to change or move where your common drive was. That's what happened to mine. I moved the common drive to another drive for space and forgot to change the location in the settings section in the FlyBywire installer. That fixed it for me.@@vkobi8208
Hi Q8! Maybe the question is a bit off topic, does Fs traffic have the same new features that FSLTL? GA, Dynamic sid etc etc? And Fs traffic have the model matching in Vatsim like FSLTL? Thanks!
To the best of my knowledge, you can use the FS Traffic models for VATSIM. The last time I tried out FS Traffic, it didn't have GA aircraft or dynamic SIDS and STARS. I haven't seen the latest version so I am 100% sure about the later part.
Ihave some kind of problem with this addon: I realized that during the flight, when I see the dashboard of the FSLTL, there is the message: " REMOVED AS OUT OF RANGE" or " REMOVED AS OUT OF RANGE BEHIND"... I do not know what I can do...
Thank you very much for your video and your experience. I appreciate this a lot. I have the same power pc like you, but on Kennedy Airport I get just 35 fps (with FSLTL and same settings like you). No idea why you get so much smoother frames. 🤔 I already delete Nvidia shaders and things like that. I thought this Airport is really a fps-Killer, even you have a power pc, but now I see your amazing fps. Any idea what I still could do or change ? Your Chanel is great 👍 happy flighing
I run a 4080 in DX12 with frame generation in 2k. Noticing you get great fps (I do as well) at the departing airport. When I get to the arrival airport the FPS plummets. Load back in and fps is back to normal. Does this happen to you?
Thanks for watching. No I don't have this issue. FPS remains solid. Just one thing to look for. There could be more aircraft within your range than departure area. Look at the CMD window and see how many are loaded.
I was going to say the same thing as Q8. Also, for me, I crank my FSLTL settings waaaay down as part of part of landing procedures and usually clear and reinject and that really helps.
I keep my fps capped to 62 with my 4090 and 7800x3d. Unforutatly getting a bit worse performance then you as my fps does dip with the 737 at kjfk with the same fsltl settings as you around 50-60 fps instead of 70-80 fps like you
Yes same settings, not sure why my pc has quite degraded performance as my pc is brand new. Tried so many ways to improve performance, but not really getting anywhere. Unsure what I should try to fix the issues. I have all drivers installed, all cpu cores enabled, hags and game mode is on, have nvidia control panel settings all set up, and I have the latest stable bios from Asus. I also tried cinebench and I’m having a score that’s lower the average for the 7800x3d. I even tried reinstalling windows and still no luck.
No you don't have to link anything. It fetches the data automatically. For better in-route traffic though, it is recommended that you get the flight database API. It is free. Link in the description.
I recommend setting parked aircraft to 0 and reduce the radiuses to 90 for both settings. It should help quite a bit and still let you have a large number of IFR flights.
Neither does my 5800X3D which is one of the fastest CPU for msfs. It's even quicker than the 13900k in this game. I think the key difference is he's running a 4090 with fake frames.
Hey Q8Pilot - thanks for showing our product and your suggested configuration.
As the dev of the FSLTL injector I'd like to just point out a couple of things that were not quite right.
The 'Max Radius to inject Ground Aircraft' - this only affects the IFR injected traffic distance not the additional aircraft distance. This will mean with 150km set in busy airspace you will be injecting IFR traffic at all the surrounding airports. So with your KLAX example that could see a significant number of extra aircraft on the ground at other airports like KBUR, KSNA etc. In addition the 'Absolute Max Airline Parked' setting only impacts the static parked aircraft, not the IFR aircraft - so won't limit those aircraft on the ground that are true IFR aircraft. I suspect that is why you see a bigger drop at KLAX.
With respect to Additional Parked Airline aircraft, a setting of 10 is equal to 50% (as opposed to 100% as noted in the video) of the overall suitable parking spaces with radius greater than 10m.
The in air radius definitely won't have a direct impact on performance, other than potentially reducing the number of aircraft in the air if airspace isn't that busy. In KLAX region 100km or 150km air radius will often have the same performance impact as you will still hit your overall IFR limit if its prime flying time. (You would be able to see that from the IFR counter displayed in the console window)
Personally I fly with 150km air and 30km ground radius - which for me gives the better experience.
Final note is with respect to VFR traffic - VFR in FSLTL is an aircraft that has not origin or destination in FR24, or just one of them - i.e. we don't know the start and end point. In KLAX region you will see plenty of these flying if you monitor them on little nav map.
We would definitely advise anyone to also review the user guide so they can read what each setting does in detail... www.fslivetrafficliveries.com/user-guide/
Thank you for pointing this out and correcting me. I appreciate it very much and sure the community does too.
Thank you FSLTL. Your product has been a game changer for me.
Thank you for this amazing software, this is top of the line, and there is no better one. But it would be great if is was less heavy
I agree somewhat, however, if you use this instead of the in-game "live air traffic" you should get much better FPS. @@guillelite7385
Another amazing guide. Super helpful my dude. You're a star
Glad this is helpful, thanks for watching!
I'm not sure I agree that the performance you were experiencing was "good". In my mind, good performance in a simulator means smooth performance which equates to consistent frametimes across all loading scenarios (FL 350 or on the ground at a busy airport). Dropping from 64 fps to 44 fps during takeoff roll necessitates changes in frametimes which the eye experiences as stutters. Instead a better approach is to aim for a consistent frametime through frame rate limitation. Just my 2 cents.
The old intro! I like this the most.
Agreed!
Unbeliavable how even the strongest cpu+gpu combo can’t push 30 fps stable without frame generation/dlss at 4k at max settings
i7 13700K and 4080, and I get 50 fps before frame generation on Ultra at 3440x1440 (ultrawide 1440p)
i get 60 at 4k
The issue isn’t the CPU or GPU… it is the standard cache settings. Nvidia makes the cache 1 gig standard. I bumped min to 100 gig and deleted all current cache files… fixed stutter in all my VR games including MSFS.
Good looks like you have seen my tutorial on shader cache.
@@thatguy7085 how do you do that?
What are you using to display the data in the top left for frames etc?
Very useful ! Thank you Q8 !!
Glad you found it useful. Thanks for watching and your support.
Good video! I wish I could get the frame rates that you do. I have an I-9 processor with 32 gigs of RAM and the RTX 3080 card. I run either dx11 or dx12 and I have everything at Ultra. I'm lucky to get 35 to 40 frames per second and with FS LTL at the larger airports I will get some stuttering and a definite big-hitting framerate. But I do love fsltl. Thanks for explaining the settings a little bit more detailed. I will play around with them.
I feel your pain. Same setup as yours except 64GB RAM. I abandoned 4K in favor of VR, and have to tune it a lot, based on complexity/density of the airports and local terrain (objects). Vexing. Almost enough to make me go crazy.
You have everything on ultra with a 3080?? I have a 3070ti with 32g and i can barely get 30fps at mid-sized airports with low to ultra grapics... Sliders are only at 1/5th. I update my motherboard, graphics card and windows regularly. What am i doing wrong?
@@AG-xq9qg Yep. Ultra. I get 45-50 fps. But I lock it to 30 fps. I use a 4K 40" Vizo gaming TV as my main monitor. Half my TVs refresh rate.
@@AG-xq9qg what cpu are you running?
Over 60 fps at New York is a dream, i just got the 14900k ,64 gb ram @ 6400 Mhz, and 4 Tb Crucial T700. Currently with rtx 3090 ftw3 Ultra, waiting for new gpu other than 4090.
Thanks for the guide!
Hi Q8Pilot - a great video again thanks. Not sure why FSLTL has become such an FPS killer very recently. I have an i9 32GB Ram and RTX 2080 Super. At the freeware EGKK using FS Traffic with a setting of 20 flights per hour (so fairly full) I get an average FPS of 41. When I switch to FSLTL using a similar traffic load and using FS Traffic models as priority my FPS drops down to about 25 and stutters. I note that with FS Traffic I get a good balance between GPU and CPU however now with FSLTL I get constant red and solid limited by mainthread. Any ideas if something has changed with FSLTL?
It would be crazy to follow your setting as you are using a RTX 4090. I guess this video is for the rich simmers with the very top end PC setup
You need to understand what a guide means. I am not suggesting you follow the settings here. This guide tells you what affects the FPS the most and how much it would tax your system. Please understand what a guide means. I
@@Q8Pilot I know but at 80+ FPS to start with you have plenty of room to play with. What about people with 30 or less FPS to start with? They cant even use this guide am i right?
@@Q8Pilot actually @Rie M.S. is right
@@tapneo623 I suppose you also need to understand what a guide is =)
@@Q8Pilot alright stick with ur opinion
By the way, was frame generation enabled here? It may be relevant for performance
Frame generation is on, but this has no relevance here. The relevance is how much FSLTL taxes your FPS and what settings will reduce the resource consumption.
Lag and stutter… if you don’t get it when you begin… but it shows up later in your flight, or when landing…
Delete your rolling cache files in the general options, data... Frame rates go down because there is a bottle neck holding up the processor.
Almost always… cache files. Also check your video card. They are saved in there. Change settings in the video card card settings for larger cache file to prevent overflow. Standard is 1 gig. Make it at least 10 gig. Mine is 100.
No more stutters at maximum settings.if frame rates are good when you start up the sim… should be good the entire flight.
Do you mean delete rolling cache and turn it off or delete rolling cache and allow it to re-generate ? If the latter, how much rolling cache size do you set ?
This advice has always confused me, as I considered timing cache to be a theoretical speed enhancer. If it can bottleneck, then what's the point at all? Just saving data? Why not turn it off then?
@@GarrisIiari All stutter stopped for me. Did the sim cache and Nvidia cache… no stutter regardless of settings.
@@GarrisIiari Note… I also bumped the cache level to 100 gig. And delete it every so often.
@@speedbird8326 delete the rolling cache and keep it rolling.
that's 20 fps impact in LAX considering you are starting your flight at the runway and not at the gate like most people
Correct
Hello i see there is ai in the grund but very little when flying ,so how to maintain more ai traffic when flying ah ,i see usa is more but asia is very less
Thank you very much for the video sir
for me, the two worst thinks about msfs are the ai traffic and atc. i’m really keen to find good ways to improve both. GA is very important to me though, so i’m not sure this helps.
I think vatsim is what you’re looking for tbh
@@captainelliot8767 you’re probably right. it just doesn’t quite meet my needs at the moment.
Thanks a lot for the video!
Thanks for watching!
hey man sick vid first of all secound of all i would love to ask are you using dlss 3 or fram gen and thanks for the vid
Thank you for demonstrating the product because I always use it now! It definitely was worth getting and is surprisingly very good as it's freeware and is even better than some other pay ware A.I Traffic addons.
Thanks for the video Q8. Could you please give me suggestion about the ATC addon you are using? Are you using default ATC of MSFS or another addon?
I finally figured out what was really causing stutter and crashing my system after flying a little while.
Check your Catche… delete it. In the sim, and and in the video card settings.
Hello Sir, just a question..have you ever been to or flown in the sim to the island of Socotra?
Hi Omari, no I haven't. What is the ICAO code please?
@@Q8Pilot OYSQ is the code..nice little island just off Yemen
Hello sir, i've heard that it possible to set textures in fsltl in 2K, how to do that ? Apprently, the textures files in fsltl traffic base in community decrease from 40go to 9 go ! do you know how to set that ?
Capitán, podrías actualizar el video, ya que hay nuevas versiones del inyector que trae nuevas líneas para configurar ?
Hello, thanks for the video. I also installed it, however, I have noticed there are basically no 747 models at the (big) airports, just saw one from a parcel carrier at OMDB but none at other big airports. Is there a problem with or what am I doing wrong? I noticed I also did not see any in your video of JFK. Thanks for your help!
My game hardly gets 25 fps with no planes on the ground what so ever and i have a relatively decent pc nothing i do in graphics setting make a different i can turn everything low as possible and still lag and idk what to do and it’s frustrating
I noticed you were not using Frame Generation. Any reason for that?
Great video as always..
By the way, what's the name of the app on your screen showing the fps and the cpu usage?
FPSMonitor
Hello, I have a good computer and antilising and anisitropic am maximum, but the airport buildings flicker and it has a strange effect, does this happen to you? how can i solve? It also happens with objects.
Some aircrafts just dont take off, they freeze on the runway and disappear after the time we set, is there a way to fix it ?
I still do not understand why I am, sitting at Teterboro regional airport, am seeing many more plane movements than Flightradar 24 shows, and I see Frontier and Delta Embraer Jets which are typical. Why does FSLTL not only show the really operating aircraft? AND - small planes are always moving about a plane lenght backwards before taxiing away.
Planes on the ground are historical from flight radar not real time.
@@Q8Pilot But why planes that do not use Teterboro? This airport is mainly for GA and Bizjet traffic that cannot use Newark or the two NYC megaports. Why should I see two Airbusses together? If this is so, FSTL is not that good, IMHO.
thanks for the update and video.........
Thanks for watching!
Does FSLTL traffic have a touchdown effect when landing?
What happens if you speed simulation time in air?? does it affect other airplanes? How do they behave if they're direct mirror of Flightradar24? thanks!
The already loaded aircraft would run as fast as the sim rate.
Hi Q8. Where is that FPS counter you have in the upper left corner of the screen? It doesn't come with FSLL?
MSI After Burner with Riva
Hello Q8 sir, i know this is a 2 month old video. But i was wondering if you can advise me if i should buy FS Traffic? Or FSLTL does a great AI traffic job already? What make FS traffic better that it'd cost 30$, sir?
FS Traffic has slightly better performance. Other than that FSLTL wins. Save your money and use FSLTL.
I am having problems with AI Sounds in external view. It constanly sounds like I am getting blasted by 1000 jet engines. How can I solve this
Hi, Why does your GPU doesn't go full 100% load for max frames. I have the same problem on busy airports and scenery my GPU will backtrottling. Less processingpower of the GPU for more scenery will result in massive framedrops, just at the paces you need it the most. My CPU only uses around 40% Temps, Power internet speed and 32GB Ram and all on SSD wouldn't been a problem.
That's because your CPU does not have enough single thread performance. CPU itself also have a FPS counter, the optimal situation is CPU fps matches GPU fps. If one of these has less power, the other one will throttle down just as you said. Even though your CPU utilization shows only 40%, it is bottlenecked. The usage only tell you the capacity of CPU power in use, not its actual processing speed.
@@ati4280 in my case the CPU is more powerfull than the GPU. In the way off during FL2020 He uses like 30% of the CPU and why wouldn't he use then 100% op GPU. There is enough power left for the CPU to ramp up.
@@LennardA320 There're many videos explain what is a CPU bottleneck. You may watch videos from Gamer's nexus or hardware unboxed.
@ati4280 I am not that technically about how everything works. However my CPU With 32GB Ram has so much overcapacity that it only uses about 30% of the totall capacity of the chip. So when I play flightsimulator. Why if your GPU can go to 100%. Why does it happen called "GPU Throttling" that when you go to land and there is more to render that instead the GPU still uses about 100% what it normally does to give as much frames as possible. So if you are cruising the gpu us standard always about 90-100% But when de scenery gets heavy. Even with Rolling Cache and here in NL Glassfiber internet. Why if the CPU isn't doing that much that still the GPU is Throttling back to maybe 50%. So due to heavy scenery you always lose frames and especially if your card is working half you losing almost your whole experience.
So far I can understand is your CPU has many Cores & Threads. And is FL2020 not optimalized to use as much cores as it can. I have 10 Cores. But do you mean it can maybe use only 6 of them so those are at 100% the rest only few per cent background so your gaming Threads are fully utilized however because the other Cores don't help the game you see that the complete utilization is less than 100 so you see maybe 40%. If this is the case. Why don't FL2020 don't use more Cores because there are far more expensive CPU's that have a lot more Cores and Threads. Am I right what I am writing here?
@@LennardA320 I totally understand your confusion, and I was confused years before. The bottleneck is rather complicated, cannot be explain clearly within one or two words. The CPU is used for scenery pre-rendering. It prepares all necessary stuffs before GPU kicks in. So, when heavy scenery in coming, or you start at large airport like Helsinki in your country, this makes CPU pretty hard to prepare all sceneries to match up the speed your GPU has. Speaking of speed, let's make it simple. You said you have 10 cores, I don't know what exactly model it is. I have a 6 core AMD CPU instead. More cores is something like more horsepower, but it doesn't mean you can go faster. E.g. M1A2 tank has more than 1000hp, but it cannot running at a speed of 300kph like a 400hp Porsche. You have more cores, but if your CPU is several years old and with a lower clock speed, that the possible reason you only see 40% usage. The reason for over 90% GPU loading while cruising is that when your altitude is high, there's less scenery processing demands unless you have high TLOD setting over like 200 TLOD. Yes, MSFS is not fully optimized for multi core, but it does use as many cores as possible to process sceneries and other stuffs. Keep this in mind, your FPS only bundle with the slowest hardware.
I have the airplanes showing but no liveries on them, there just with basic msfs colors,
You need to disable MSFS default traffic. Please consult my tutorial here th-cam.com/video/fLX3q-Rpc-o/w-d-xo.html
What tool do you use for the FPS/GPU overlay?
MSI Afterburner with Riva
i’m struggling as when I land at a fairly busy single runway airport using fsltl I have to go around like 3-4 times before I can land due to everytime i’m on final a new plane enters the runway
Use reset traffic from FSLTL menu about 10nm from landing.
@@Q8Pilot thankyou! appreciate that
As recommended I created an API key. Do I only have to do this once or every time I start the injector?
Just once.
Hi Q8 can I ask why I don’t have the real liveries on traffics?
I am not I understand your question.
hi Q8 Pilot how do you get this small tool in upper left corner to meassure the FPS is is extra tool ?
That's the MSI Afterburner Overlay
@@manic_miner @Q8Pilot but how to use it i have instelled it but it does not show anywhere in sim
thx for info
Hello Q8Pilot. Thanks for the video. I'm having an issue with getting aircraft to show up. When I hit start the box comes up, I put N as I don't want to make any changes to the above settings, it connects to MSFS, but the only line I get is KJFK using max 40 additional parked aircraft, nothing else. When I go to the sim, I may get a few vehicles but no aircraft. My settings are as follows, 90, 0, 3, 0, 100, 150, 180, yes,yes,yes,no, no, FS traffic will be prioritized. Any suggestions, Thanks Robert
Do you have FS Traffic models installed? Also did you install the models for FSLTL?
Well. I installed the FBW installer, installed the, A320-251N A32NX model, then the base models and then the FTLTL injector, all three items have a check mark on them.
yeah i am having the same problem
Hey, did you happen to change or move where your common drive was. That's what happened to mine. I moved the common drive to another drive for space and forgot to change the location in the settings section in the FlyBywire installer. That fixed it for me.@@vkobi8208
Hi Q8! Maybe the question is a bit off topic, does Fs traffic have the same new features that FSLTL? GA, Dynamic sid etc etc? And Fs traffic have the model matching in Vatsim like FSLTL? Thanks!
To the best of my knowledge, you can use the FS Traffic models for VATSIM. The last time I tried out FS Traffic, it didn't have GA aircraft or dynamic SIDS and STARS. I haven't seen the latest version so I am 100% sure about the later part.
@The Occasional PilotOk thank you! The airac or the full subscription?
Ihave some kind of problem with this addon: I realized that during the flight, when I see the dashboard of the FSLTL, there is the message: " REMOVED AS OUT OF RANGE" or " REMOVED AS OUT OF RANGE BEHIND"... I do not know what I can do...
Increase the removal time to 240 seconds and increase your range a little bit.
Thank you very much!
THANK YOU!
Thanks for watching my friend!
@@Q8Pilot You're welcome. I have watched several "help" videos and yours is one of the best. Thanks for the simple terms.
I'm still getting Generic models, even though all settings are off?
Make sure AI traffic in msfs settings is set to 0
Thank you very much for your video and your experience. I appreciate this a lot. I have the same power pc like you, but on Kennedy Airport I get just 35 fps (with FSLTL and same settings like you). No idea why you get so much smoother frames. 🤔 I already delete Nvidia shaders and things like that. I thought this Airport is really a fps-Killer, even you have a power pc, but now I see your amazing fps. Any idea what I still could do or change ? Your Chanel is great 👍 happy flighing
Thank you for your kind words. Do you have frame generation enabled?
@@Q8Pilot you’re welcome :) Yes, I have frame generation enabled. which nvidia driver do you have ?
I run a 4080 in DX12 with frame generation in 2k. Noticing you get great fps (I do as well) at the departing airport. When I get to the arrival airport the FPS plummets. Load back in and fps is back to normal. Does this happen to you?
Thanks for watching. No I don't have this issue. FPS remains solid. Just one thing to look for. There could be more aircraft within your range than departure area. Look at the CMD window and see how many are loaded.
I was going to say the same thing as Q8. Also, for me, I crank my FSLTL settings waaaay down as part of part of landing procedures and usually clear and reinject and that really helps.
Great video!
Thanks for watching!
Do you like this better than the fly by wire one?
I am not sure I get you. Like what better than FlyByWire?
@@Q8Pilot apologies, this is from the fly by wire installer lol
So, do you personally prefer MS, or X Plane?
Both sims are great and enjoy both for different reasons.
What tool are you using for you FPS?
I use MSI Afterburner with Riva
I keep my fps capped to 62 with my 4090 and 7800x3d. Unforutatly getting a bit worse performance then you as my fps does dip with the 737 at kjfk with the same fsltl settings as you around 50-60 fps instead of 70-80 fps like you
Check my airport ground traffic settings towards the end of the video. Do you have the same settings?
Yes same settings, not sure why my pc has quite degraded performance as my pc is brand new. Tried so many ways to improve performance, but not really getting anywhere. Unsure what I should try to fix the issues. I have all drivers installed, all cpu cores enabled, hags and game mode is on, have nvidia control panel settings all set up, and I have the latest stable bios from Asus. I also tried cinebench and I’m having a score that’s lower the average for the 7800x3d. I even tried reinstalling windows and still no luck.
I hear that fstl uses flightradar24. Do you have to link that somewhere.
No you don't have to link anything. It fetches the data automatically. For better in-route traffic though, it is recommended that you get the flight database API. It is free. Link in the description.
@@Q8Pilot thank you for the reply!
What is flightplandatabase API ?
It provides better routes for flights enroute.
@@Q8Pilot If i already have simbrief/navigraph do i need to import my flyplans on it ?
my i9-9900K cant cope with these settings, have to lower it way way way down
I recommend setting parked aircraft to 0 and reduce the radiuses to 90 for both settings. It should help quite a bit and still let you have a large number of IFR flights.
Neither does my 5800X3D which is one of the fastest CPU for msfs. It's even quicker than the 13900k in this game.
I think the key difference is he's running a 4090 with fake frames.
@@caribbaviator7058 Man i still feel Asobo needs to do alot of optimizations on CPU side
But soon as i get the wheels off the ground the game plays perfect 🤷♂️
Do you live in Kuwait؟
Yes
SUMMARY:
Spend literally 3.000$ just in a 4090 + 64GB RAM + 13th gen i9 and you'll be able to get 60 fps in MSFS with FSLTL 🔥🔥🔥
What does FSLTL mean?
Flight Simulator Live Traffic Liveries
@@Q8Pilot Thanks. Boneheads like me don't always know what you're talking about.
RTX 4090 hardly a typical setup!
Nothing to do with the set up here. It is a guide, it tells you which items will tax your system the most.
Letitia Springs
Rhiannon Center
Edwina Manor
Samson Locks
Thora Road
Bernier Loop
احد عربي يشرح لي ياشباب ولا لازم اعيش في تكساس ههههه
شنو المشكله اللي تواجهك اخوي؟
@@Q8Pilot الله يسلمك ابي اعرف بعض الاعدادات الصحيحة لذا البرنامج بس ابشرك طبقت الشرح واشتغل معي تسلم ماقصرت
why you show so much garbage in front..
Sorry didn't quite understand your comment.