Bonnietheboss man hes a liar which makes him a dick! for years we've been told the earth was round, now this dick wants us to believe its pear shaped (google it or youtube). science folk expect us to just accept this shit without question haha bLAAAAAAAAAAAA
I think it would be even cooler if the lake (her landing site) was actually in North Korea, so she would get arrested right after the lucky landing and put into some kind of work camp. 😁 I’d love to see such a funny fuckup in the end.
There's a Russian movie called The Spacewalker, which is based on the real story of cosmonaut Alexei Leonov, the first man to do a spacewalk. After landing off course on Earth he found himself in a dark forest in Siberia full of wolves and bears. He barely escaped with his life. You can read about the real life story here: www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/2014/newsspec_9035/index.html
At the end of the movie, the scene where she crawls up onto the bank of that lake, I was seriously hoping there was a lion or crocodile that she had to fight off...
Lol at the end of the movie all I was thinking is that she's stranded in the middle of a jungle, the movie is far from over. The escape from the jungle would be almost as impressive as the escape from space.
+That One Hero I would have loved that, would have been WAY more satisfying. "Oh my god, I... I survived! I did it! Hah! I'm alive! Aaaah I'm alive, it's wonderf-" *lion jumps at her and mauls her to death* The end.
You missed the part when Ryan cries and her tears float. In real life her tears should've pooled under her eyes. But I guess they did that for the 3d effect.
I have to disagree with calling landing in the water "the luckiest thing in the world" because most of the earth is water, so you're actually more likely to land in water over land.
Luke Han And it was probably unlucky instead, since the Soyuz lands on land and she was informed that it lands just like a Soyuz. Though, if I'm wrong I blame Clooney's incorrect lines!
69 sins? As in 1969? The year man first landed on the moon? And what rhymes with moon? June, the month BEFORE Sandra Bullock's birthday, and the month AFTER George Clooney's birthday. Sandra Bullock and George Clooney both have 13 letters in their names. 1969 divided by 13, rounding down equals 151, the number of Pokemon in the first generation. And what move can be learned by many of those Pokemon in the current games? GRAVITY.
You skipped the part that goes something like "and who does she play in this movie? Ryan. The name of a TH-camr that makes abstract connections like this."
On the man made objects part shouldn't the craft itself produce gravity? if so does that mean that if we create a space craft a few miles long could it have small objects orbit it? That would be pretty neat as a gravitational tether to the craft
matthew david jarvis so if we found a way to push a black hole around we could use it as a fairly strong gravitational tether say the mass of earth id say it would be around the size of a apple maybe? That would provide a good gravitational well for things to orbit it and probably a nice way for making a craft have earth like gravity one problem I would see is that it would tear someone to sheds if you think about it because earth’s crust is as close as we can get to the gravitational center so it would give WAY more room to get close and at those forces it would tear the ship apart and eat it so maybe the size of the moon that would be around the size of ball with an inch worth of diameter that would make a great basis for a deep space craft it could be built into the shape of a ball then excuse my nonsense but I find gravity a very interesting topic to talk about and I wonder if we will ever find a way to produce matter with anti gravity properties
I'm going to "well, actually" here and note that 1) The Chinese pod is a copy of the Russian Soyuz she flew to the station, so she wasn't pushing buttons completely at random, just doing it by memory; and 2) the Soyuz is in fact _designed_ to land on solid ground (in Kazakhistan, specifically.) It fires retro-rockets just before landing to cushion the impact, and in fact we see those rockets fire a moment before it hits the water.
Also,the fact that we enjoy sci-for people in sci-if space more than real people in real space is actually either a sin on the viewers or complimenting the movie for being more interesting than reality. Then again,why do we enjoy sci-fi stories on sci-fi Earth more than the stories our friends tell us?
Oh, sure. The Soyuz was designed to make emergency water landings if necessary. I was responding to the "sin" about the luck of hitting a lake for a safe landing vs. a deadly crash on land.
To be honest, the one part that REALLY got me mad was the part where Kowalski is telling Ryan to let go, as if some invisible force were pulling him. When I was watching the movie, even I was screaming "DUDE, ALL RYAN HAS TO DO IT TUG ON THE ROPE AND YOU'LL GO FLYING BACK TO HER!!!" For me, that was the biggest plothole. And I agree, she could've landed anywhere on Earth! Heck, she could've landed in the middle of the Pacific ocean.
@@toomanysandwiches8665 but astronauts hating space is a different thing because unlike somebody working as a cashier because they have to make money and nobody takes them hating there Job makes sense but you don't become a astronaut because you have too and make money normally astronaut become astronauts because they like space
YOU FORGOT A SIN! At the very end, when you see Ryan Stone floating up to the surface of the ocean, she is in at least 50 feet of water. But when she surfaces, the water is quite shallow. Also, Niel deGrasse, people enjoy this movie better than actual NASA footage because you can feel the suspense and the cinematography makes it as if you were in space yourself! Despite that, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR FINALLY DOING THIS MOVIE!!!
The Action Brick You obviously haven't seen, or even searched for high resolution images of images taken in outer space. Plus, as said before, no matter what, nothing beat the real footage.
LloydieLynn Videos and images of actual space are awesome. But, it's much easier to present space in a relateable way with digital photography. Like in the shot where we see an astronaut, a space station, the sunlit side of earth, the dark side, the stars AND the aurora borealis. no camera yet exists that can capture all of those entirely different things simultaneously. Different light settings on the camera to get a clear image of an astronaut would make the stars behind invisible. CGI is better suited to show us what really is there, and give us a proper sense of the emotional impact of being there, than actual cameras. in many ways (not absolutely always, of course)
The only blatantly unrealistic scene I had a problem with was Clooney saying she had to "let go" so they don't both get dragged away. Huh? She had already grabbed and stopped him. There wasn't any force pulling him away anymore. They could have done the same scene but made it realistic by not grabbing Clooney in the first place. He's hurling towards her, sees her foot is barely caught in the cable and that the slightest jolt would send her flying into space, and purposely retracts his hand so that she doesn't grab him as he flies by, knowing that he would doom them both if he grabbed her.
@@jenniferreyes2865 she reentered in a Chinese Shenzhu She had to abandon the Soyuz as she got to the Chinese station Granted, the Shenzhu is a cheap Soyuz knockoff, and they look very similar (besides the mad lack of handrails on the Shenzhu) But having to abandon the Soyuz to get to the Shenzhu is a big deal in terms of the plot George Clooney comes back from the dead to suggest it and everything
@@347Jimmy it's not a knockoff, more like technology transfer. USSR helps China a lot in their early space program. Since most of the world aligns with the US, and China is a communist country, USSR have a lot of incentive to help.
What about that thing at the end, where she just stands up and starts walking without any kind of trouble? Don't astronauts have to adjust to gravity after being in zero-G for so long? Or did I get my facts wrong?
That's true. Astronauts who lived on the ISS definetly have to reajust to a normal life on earth after half a year in zero-G. But these issues only emerge after such a long time in space. I guess she was just a few days tops up there and the first problems with walking ect. only appear after about 1-2 weeks. So I wouldn't consider this tiny fact an unrealistc fact. The rest of the film however is sadly rediculous, which is a shame since it is so well done in its pictures.
wow, I did not know that you actually grow in space. Now that i think of it, that would make sence, with lack of gravity... Or is it for a different reason? i'll have research it:)
Will Smith Fights Off Alien Apocalypse = No Oscar Leonardo DiCaprio Jumps Through Dreamscapes = No Oscar Harrison Ford Aids In The Overthrow Of Galactic Empire In One Of Hollywood's Most Famous And Successful Franchises Of All Time = No Oscar Sandra Bullock Floats Through Space = OSCAR OSCAR OSCAR ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This. This right here. This is bullsh*t.
Thomas Jiang Not my point. Even if the movies recieved oscars, the actors did not. Harrison Ford recieved no Oscars for star wars, Leonardo DiCaprio recieved none for Inception, and Will Smith has never recieved any to my knowledge either. Meanwhile,Sandra Bullock grabs one for Gravity, a fictional movie about falling through space. I'm just a little miffed that three great actors in three separate movies with creative takes on different subjects didn't get squat, while an actor i'm not particularly fond of gets one in a movie where the screenwriters took probably 5 seconds to come up with a plot. It just seems kinda lazy
samuelbrowning88 The thing is, Oscars look for performances or roles that show great emotional range or ones that are very commanding. The performances that you listed are great no doubt, but don't show much emotional range and that's mostly because their roles don't allow for it. They're just not really typical Oscar roles.
Thomas Jiang That makes sense, but only enrages me further, because it means that an actor doesn't necessarily receive the Oscar as a recognition of skill, but rather for being in the right role at the right time. Which, I may add, is a factor they have no control over because they get selected by the producers to fill whatever role, which they can then accept or decline. In other words, they may as well give the Oscar for best actor/actress to the damn writers for creating the emotionally complex character that the actor portrays.
samuelbrowning88 True, but at the same time, some roles just simply do not require as much skill to pull off as others. Like your Han Solo example, he's an iconic character for sure, but performance wise just doesn't take as much skill or emotional range to pull off than say Heath Ledger's Joker. It's just an easier role to play. While it is unfortunate that the Oscars are very selective, but they aren't necessarily without good reason either.
You missed a big one. When. She gets in the tangled up escape pod, you see her using the RCS positional thrusters to move the spacecraft. Once she is free and lines up the pod to go to the Chinese station, she flips out because the main fuel is empty, but she glazes over the fact that the escape pod RCS thruster controls can be put into docking mode, which allows forward and backward movement. So the whole hopping out with the fire extinguisher move was completely pointless
Darth Revan Internet troll wastes his life watching videos he hates only to tell successful creators of said videos to get a life... ... That's racist. Sin Count: 2
@@arfansthename RE: "All of the Apollo re-entries (11-17) splashdowns in the middle of the Atlantic." Most of the splashdowns of the Apollo missions were in the Pacific Ocean. Only two, Apollo 7 (location: 27°32′N 64°04′W) and Apollo 9 (location: 23°15′N 67°56′W), were in the Atlantic Ocean. Reference: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splashdown#Locations
I have to correct you on 7:38. The chance of landing into water is actually larger than on land, because you know, 70.8% of Earth surface area is water.
+Stormfox But I think Russian/Chinese Earth landers are meant to land on a surface. That being said I think it's more of a sin her landing in water so she can almost die for a fortieth time.
+Stormfox Yeah but what if she landed in the middle of the ocean? He said shes lucky to land in a lake because i lake would be closer to land. There is a 97 percent chance she would have landed, stranded out in the middle of the ocean.
7:45 Regarding landing in a lake bring "lucky" : considering the Chinese escape pod is obviously modelled based on Soyuz spacecraft and Soyus is intended to land on ground and thus not good at floating in water (unlike US space capsules that have big-ass inflatable rafts to help them float correct side up)
I actually have astronaut syndrome. In a nutshell, it's a fun name for muscle deconditioning. Effects depend on how much muscle is "lost." Astronauts do do some exercise. She should have felt something if in space for a few months, but it wouldn't be too bad. I have it a bit more than astronauts would and I mainly feel it when using stairs. It actually takes quite a long time to be significantly deconditioned. I spent about a year not doing much besides going to school. It wasn't great, but was in way better shape than you'd think
I think it was a good choice naming the film Gravity. Because it's the ultimate antagonist and antihero. It saves the protagonist. Gravity is the reason satellites orbit. It's why Doctor Stone wasn't flung into outer space when she was ejected (she was much slower than escape velocity). It's why she re-entered. Finally, when she dragged herself onto the beach and struggled to get up, collapsing after a push up, it's because she had weight again. Must have been an amazing feeling, hence why she giggled.
Another sin: when astronauts in space cry, the teardrops do not fall off their faces. Because they are in microgravity, the tears just stick to their faces. Look for a video and you'll see what I mean. I also enjoyed Gravity very much.
I thought I was the only one who noticed that. Every scene included at least half a minute of heavy breathing, towards the end I began rooting for her to die.
While I agree with you on the thermal suit and space diapers, I kinda liked that Sandra Bullock wasn't wearing them. I would deduct at least 3 sins for the gratuitous near nudity.
Idk how long the plot had them in space, but haven't we all seen astronauts walk out of the Space Shuttle when they land? She got a lot of exercise up there, too. She would be fine, movement wise. However, she'd still drown before she got that cumbersome suit off.
She landed right next to shore, that's what was unlikely to me. And a 30% chance is a decent chance considering, the point is weighed up with all the other variables it is unlikely.
@@sploofmcsterra4786 When I watched the movie a second time, I'm pretty sure during the end they show a map and crosshairs where the expected landing zone is. If I'm recalling correctly, the crosshairs are off the coast of Washington state.
@@Exkhaniber RE: "If I'm recalling correctly, the crosshairs are off the coast of Washington state." Why would a Chinese spacecraft be programmed to land off the coast of Washington state?
@@spaceman081447 Because no matter what, Astronauts are civilians and are not subject to the political whims and/or fallout of their respective countries? Like, in the real world, if a Chinese astronaut had to emergency ditch from space and landed close to the American coast, you can bet the Coast Guard would be picking him up, making sure he was safe, fed, and gotten to a hospital if he needs it. Astronauts are highly respected civilians, not military. If anyone has to emergency ditch, they would treated as a respected guest of that country until transport can be arranged elsewhere. Also this has to be said - this was an emergency maneuver. It could have been programmed to prefer a given place, but *it's an emergency. You don't get to choose where that emergency happens or how much time you have to get over a preferred target area*. If the only re-entry angles at that moment in time took her to the middle of the Pacific Ocean, then that's what you have to deal with. If the only viable re-entry path takes her over Italy, so be it. China is big, but it isn't "no matter where in orbit you are, you can get to China" big. Besides, you're asking about the logic of a movie. Errors happen. I saw this twice in theaters, and as I said, I paid close attention to that brief moment where the map was displayed because I was curious about this as well. It looked like she landed just off Washington State, but that map is flashed up on screen only briefly. I didn't have the luxury of watching it on DVD or Netflix and pausing it to view it, which I invite you to do actually. I'm not 100% positive of what I saw for only a fleeting moment, but I did look out for it as best I could during the experience. If you want to watch it on Netflix, pause it, screenshot it, and let us know what you find, I'd be interested to see.
2:48 is what genuinely pissed me off so much wen watching the movie i almost left. I mean REALLY? I thought Neil would have been more pissed at that. he died because physics decided not to physics any more
eh, I think thats wrong because Clooney already had a lot of momentum on him without any resistance on a path away from the station, whilst Bullock was barely stationary with the cables stuck on her feet. So he has 3 options, hold on, tug or let go. If he held on, they both would just get stuck there and die. If he tugs, he pulls her along with him, granted at a slower velocity but still away from station. So he did the last option, he resigned to his fate and let go.
At 3:01 From ND Tyson: "In zero-G, a single tug brings them together" *A SINGLE TUG!* Meaning, there was NO reason for Clooney's character to die. He'd have bounced back and they'd both continue to be in the movie... So glad I didn't see this in theaters, or I'd have been kicked out for yelling. That moment was the last straw. UGH!
Dude, Clooney lost all his momentum the moment she caught his tether. He's stationary w.r.t Bullock which means his velocity vector is same as that of Bullock. So "a single tug should've brought them together" is the right thing to say. He would be pulling her only if the there's something pulling him and not her which is only possible if there is a miniature black hole nearby with the right amount of gravity differential.
This film was good but thats it, it didn't deserve so many Oscars and is still receiving way too much hype about how Amazing it is. Best film of 2013-No Most Overrated film of 2013-Yes
D3ADLYTHRUST52 I understand it and all, but most of the time it is just her hyperventilating or crashing into satellites. A book you can in vision it for yourself, but watching it is boring. Trust me I am a fan of movies but sitting for all that time just gets to me.
While I do not argue it having won awards for the special effects, I felt like slapping the scriptwriters face in with that shitty script, and that is my only argument for having disliked the movie. I felt it treated its audience like a bunch of dumb half wit children (perhaps worse) who would be dazzled by sparkly effects and disregard anything else.
I enjoyed it as a good disaster film, like Deep Impact or The Day After Tomorrow, where dialogue is less relevant. Fun popcorn flick, lots of fun in 3D
You realize that all of the Oscars it won were the technical ones, plus best direction, right? You can argue about whether 'best direction' was rightfully awarded, but I think it rightfully deserved all of the technical awards.
I agree, if she landed in the ocean then it wouldn't really be convenient, but because she manged to land in the lake surrounded by a ton of land, as you said; is mighty convenient.
Khrayfish Actually, from what I've read, the Chinese capsules (which are basically the same as the Russian ones) are designed to land over ground, and not water. So the lake landing was really just another strike of bad luck on her part.
Olle Rönn But this was a Hollywood capsule, designed to land someplace to give you that OMG!?!?!, is she going to make it, place. Personally, I was hoping for a volcano or downtown Detroit.
TheDeadlyAvenger I get what you're saying but that sounds like it boils down to "It had really, REALLY good greenscreen!" well, aside from George Lucas, no one else thinks that's a good thing.
TheDeadlyAvenger The writers forgot one thing: When you make a movie filled with tension -- constantly placing the protagonist in danger -- make sure you make that protagonist relate to the audience. If the protagonist is trite or otherwise unlikable, then no one cares how much danger she gets in. I was bored and looked at my watch several times wondering when the movie would be over.
I breathed a huge sigh of relief when Neil said he really liked the movie, because I love the movie and if he hated it then I'd be doing something wrong.
You'd be "doing something wrong" just because you have a different opinion from Neil DeGrasse Tyson? That's ridiculous. Peer pressure is horrible, do not succumb to it. Follow-the-leader is not a fun game.
I hate how everyone's claiming that this is stupid, it cinema SINs this is what the channels about , finding stupid and often valid problems with movies. Just because you enjoyed the film doesn't mean it's perfect
Sin #52 is the best sin. It's a disgraces what has become of our space exploration. The space race began in 1955, 14 years later in 1969, humans landed on the moon, it's been 45 years since that great moment, yet we are pretty much stuck in that same position we were in 1969. Sure we sent tons of satellites and unnamed craft since, but human exploration has been stuck in 1969. Kennedy announced the man would walk on the moon in 1961 they did it in less then 10 years, what have we done since? We have pretty much all the technology and knowledge to send people to mars, yet we are much happier to wage war with each other. The human mind needs expanding, you know what will give us the next computer or internet, space exploration. Space exploration makes people think, they can think of things we can't even imagine yet, feeding our minds helps every single other aspect of our lives and planet.
What? We're less than a decade from sending people to Mars and we now know about dark energy and are a good way to knowing what dark matter is. We've made plenty of progress in the space department.
Mastikator We knew how to send them them to mars 10 years ago. Also while there have been great discoveries since the moon landing very few of them are actually discoveries that help us get to mars.
Why the everlasting fuck do you think they're developing the Orion Spacecraft, the SLS, and the asteroid capture initiative thingy? Not to mention SpaceX's Red Dragon mission, or all the other stuff that's being developed by various countries?
New sin,if they orbit earth every 90 minutes, the debris would be orbiting every 90 minutes the other way, then they would be meeting the debris every 45 minutes, stuff In space doesn't stay still,
More accurately, the stuff in space was clearly traveling at a different velocity to every object she was at, so why did they always intersect? Anybody who knows anything about physics should know better than that.
+Wesley D. Well, then it would have a relative velocity of roughly 15 kilometers per second. You wouldn't even see the debris go by. Also, how is there that much retrograde junk in the same orbit, in the same plane, same orbital period, and an intersection with three different locations with people or a person on-site in less than 72 hours? Retrograde satellites aren't very common because you fight the rotation of the earth.
Plus, when she cries, tears fly away from her face. Liquids tend to "stick" to solid objects. In fact, an astronaut, almost drowned because of this... www.space.com/22485-italian-astronaut-spacesuit-leak-video.html
I'd like to point out that I'm happy Neil deGrasse Tyson liked the movie despite the factual errors. This comment at the end is something that people seem to forget when watching Cinema Sins (at least people unfamiliar with the series). Just because there are errors in a movie, doesn't mean you can't enjoy it. Every movie has errors; both factual and production errors. No movie is without sins. Just because you point out errors in a movie doesn't mean you don't enjoy it. I'm sure the guy who runs this channel likes quite a few movies he's gone through, but as with deGrasse Tyson, he's not stating his opinion. He's stating errors.
"Why we enjoy a Sci-Fi film in make believe space more than we enjoy actual people in actual space"...completely agree with NDT on this. If you want to see some cool shit, watch the ISS live stream on the NASA channel.
> Why we enjoy a Sci-Fi film in make believe space more than we enjoy actual people in actual space Well, maybe because this film, while set in space, is about people and not about space?
Tyson is one of my heroes- was totally awesome to have him in your video. His Star Talk radio show is great too. Great video, as usually. Keep them coming!
as far as that comment about the astronaut telling a medical doctor what is happening to her when she is breathing CO2, you'd be surprised what you can't remember in a panic situation, especially when the panic situation includes oxygen deprivation
I've seen several critics comment on the implausibility of Stone's daughter's death. Life is unfortunately like that - humans are at the same time incredibly durable (e.g.: a woman testifying against her attacker with a .357 slug still lodged in her brain) yet incredibly fragile (e.g.: landing badly from a running fall).
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra I know it is an old one, but I still go into a mini nerd rage every time I think about the ice sinking because it got blown up....
Jake Heuft ok do you see what this comment is posted on? are you just following me around so you can find some way to tell me i am wrong? I posted a suggestion on a video about tearing apart the mistakes in movies. This is not sherlock level stuff here.
Who says they're mistakes? MOVIES AREN'T REAL LIFE... Do I have to explain that to you?! Apparently I do! You're comparing the movie like it HAS to match up to real life... Like fantasy is somehow directly influencing reality because it must match up to it... Did you ever watch the actual original GI-Joe? I did all the time! I never once ever equated it with anything involving reality. It's early crude storytelling to young children. It's written ALL over the screenplay for the movie, apparently you did miss it even in the modernization. I agree with Tyson, he points out the mistakes PERFECTLY... He destroys the layers the film makers create to tell a story in the process.. Science can not tell beautiful stories. Go ahead, show me a visualization of a modern scientific process that doesn't have the tag line "Artist impression" bellow it... You're conflating reality and fantasy out of context.
I watched this movie with a Russian girl. She was pissed from the very beginning where it was Russia's fault satellites were crashing into each other. I did not get laid that night.
Ro Jasen The screwed up a lot of things (not that all other sci-fi movies get it right). But other movies you can forgive for great story or characters. None of them in this movie. I'd rather watch IMAX's 3D movie about real Hubble telescope.
You forgot a few crucial things: She only has seconds, yet decides to count down before pushing a button. She lands in water. Her suit should protect her from it and Grant her oxygen, and she could walk to the shore, yet she decides to take off the helmet so her heavy suit sucks in heavy water, so she unnecessarily almost drowned while fiddling with the suit. 71 total
This movie kept hitting you over the head so much with more and more dangers just as she had escaped the last one, I was genuinely expecting there to be a lion or a cannibalistic tribe waiting for her on the shore when she got out her spacecraft..
3:00 I'm so glad someone pointed this out. The first time I watched this movie, it bugged the hell out of me why she didn't just pull Clooney towards her.
"That's called having your cake and inhaling it too." - Going out on a limb here, is that the single best one-liner in the entire history of Cinema Sins? I think it is!
I don't care if she's hallucinating, the fact that a medical doctor really believe Clooney's character can come back from the dead after being without propulsion and oxygen in the middle of space and open her pod without a sass and doesn't kill her in the process is a mind blowing sin...
You do know that doctors are humans to, therefore things that happen like a hallucination to normal people ALSO happens to people who have a degree in medicine. A degree doesn't make you a computer.
Not just that, but the Soyuz spacecraft doesn't even have a hatch there. An obviously dead astronaut entering through a nonexistent hatch and Bullock's character being OK after just being exposed to vacuum? Dead obvious it's a hallucination.
Because it only takes eight seconds to remove a spacesuit, you won't be killed by 700 mp\h space debris, and you can totally survive everything portrayed in this movie. 10\10 would not watch again
PLEASE DO INTERSTELLAR PLEASE! ALTHOUGH THE MOVIE WAS ENJOYABLE AND MADE ME FEEL WAVES OF EMOTIONS, THERE WERE SOME ROOKIE MISTAKES THAT I COULDNT HELP BUT NOTICE.
Bret Vines It's absolutely worth seeing. I'm not the biggest fan of matthew McConaughey either, but damn it was just so good. It's an absolute mindfuck lol.
My only criticism on this video is that there was no mention of how often she took her helmet off despite hull breaches being imminent. As if having the helmet off helped her do anything except add to panic scenes
I don't understand all the love Gravity got, sure it's a nice movie and it looks great, but it's not the best movie ever made. It's very boring, not because it's about space and science, space and science are amazing subjects and far from boring, but the movie is just talking for 2 hours, with many aspects that just don't make sense or are terribly wrong. Gravity is a nice movie, but please don't think that it correctly represents space, astronauts and science.
TopFilm5s Sure it was shit to me, but I don't really think people are stupid for liking it, I do think it's stupid for loving it and thinking it's the best movie this year/ever. There are people that can make a movie where it's just them alone for the majority of the movie, like Tom Hanks in Castaway, but Sandra Bullock in Gravity is not one of them.
I saw the movie before I went and watched this video, and I was already sinning the hell out of it while watching it. If I were watching alone, instead of with my friends, I would've grabbed an actual bell, and ding it everytime I noticed an inaccuracy or a plain sin.
NOOOOO not the Canadarm! But there seriously should have been. In Space Cowboys, when Ethan tries to do Dr. Corvin's job, I wasn't mad at him for destroying a multi-billion dollar satellite or basically getting Hawk killed. I was mad because he broke the Canadarm.
7:37 Described landing in water instead of ground as being the "one of the luckiest escapes in movie history" - not really, the Shenzhou, like the Soyuz it's based on, unlike American space capsules, is designed to land on dry land, which is why it has those retro-rockets. It can land in water safely, but land is preferable. What's really lucky though is that this water landing was near the edge of a lake rather than in the middle of a huge ocean. Also, a "what's the damage" for this movie would be hilarious. Probably the most expensive other than those that involve entire cities or the whole Earth being destroyed. Possibly among the highest damage per death of any movie.
Somehow the ISS and Chinese station were in tact and didn’t get hit by debris until she got there.
Bullock carries the Curse of Oberth!
The ISS had taken some superficial damage to its larger areas, but the critical components and pressure hulls were intact enough to still function.
She is badluck lol
They were in a different orbit, at a different height, so the chances of them being hit are 0, unless the debris has some orbit-adjusting mechanism.
sjonnie playfull well they both got hit in the movie so I don’t know what drugs ur on
How did you get such a famous boxer like Neil deGrasse Tyson?
+luigikiller1000 heh
+luigikiller1000 XD
+Paul Curran Neil deGrasse Tyson is not a "dick". That's just being an asshole dude, not cool.
Paul Curran no were not related but he doesnt act like an asshole at all
Bonnietheboss man hes a liar which makes him a dick! for years we've been told the earth was round, now this dick wants us to believe its pear shaped (google it or youtube). science folk expect us to just accept this shit without question haha
bLAAAAAAAAAAAA
Movie Sin Tally: *69*
Sentence: *Nice*
I will give them 1 sin for nothing that
Nice
Simultaneous oral sex nice 👌
I guess you just sinned CinemaSins
JUST GIVE IT 1 MORE SIN I CANT HANDLE 69
The only sin in this movie is that she wasn’t attacked by a large animal when she landed
I was expecting that
Was exactly thinking the same thing
I think it would be even cooler if the lake (her landing site) was actually in North Korea, so she would get arrested right after the lucky landing and put into some kind of work camp. 😁 I’d love to see such a funny fuckup in the end.
There's a Russian movie called The Spacewalker, which is based on the real story of cosmonaut Alexei Leonov, the first man to do a spacewalk. After landing off course on Earth he found himself in a dark forest in Siberia full of wolves and bears. He barely escaped with his life. You can read about the real life story here: www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/2014/newsspec_9035/index.html
@@Ozymandias1 Wow. Will do, thanks!
At the end of the movie, the scene where she crawls up onto the bank of that lake, I was seriously hoping there was a lion or crocodile that she had to fight off...
then she would die and the credits would roll in.that would be hilarous
Lol at the end of the movie all I was thinking is that she's stranded in the middle of a jungle, the movie is far from over. The escape from the jungle would be almost as impressive as the escape from space.
+That One Hero I would have loved that, would have been WAY more satisfying. "Oh my god, I... I survived! I did it! Hah! I'm alive! Aaaah I'm alive, it's wonderf-" *lion jumps at her and mauls her to death* The end.
+Dr Famine *clap* *clap* *clap*
What would happen when she realizes"ok what now?"
You missed the part when Ryan cries and her tears float. In real life her tears should've pooled under her eyes. But I guess they did that for the 3d effect.
Hey bro
EVERYTHING WRONG WITH GRAVITY
-It prevents you from flying
+Grose Zero well said sir well said
+Grose Zero actually its the only thing that allows FLIGHT
+Chad W Dont forget about the Air.
+Chad W is that true? wouldn't we all be flying without gravity?
+Rumi Russey well the universe would fall apart as well
I love how Neil sounds so wise and serious when he's throwing off his sarcastic dialogues
Cinema Sins is the only sin
She landed safely,
in north Korea! :D
gravity 2: calamity
*cue screaming guitar and explosions around edge of screen*
gravity 2: the birth of Kim Jong deux
I actually thought that when I just finished the movie about 20 minutes ago.
Looks more like Norway or Finland
just as bad tbh
I have to disagree with calling landing in the water "the luckiest thing in the world" because most of the earth is water, so you're actually more likely to land in water over land.
Luke Han Maybe he meant falling in a lake near earth?
Yeah, that's what I thought too.
Luke Han He meant falling near the earth.
Luke Han Salt water, perhaps, but not the fresh water lake she landed in.
Luke Han And it was probably unlucky instead, since the Soyuz lands on land and she was informed that it lands just like a Soyuz. Though, if I'm wrong I blame Clooney's incorrect lines!
69 sins? As in 1969? The year man first landed on the moon? And what rhymes with moon? June, the month BEFORE Sandra Bullock's birthday, and the month AFTER George Clooney's birthday. Sandra Bullock and George Clooney both have 13 letters in their names. 1969 divided by 13, rounding down equals 151, the number of Pokemon in the first generation. And what move can be learned by many of those Pokemon in the current games? GRAVITY.
Wow...just wow. I applaud your strange way of thinking...is gravity even in the first generation of pokemon though?
That was almost like nigahiga's logic lol xD
CerberusKnox In before someone says "half life 3 confirmed".
P.S. Wtf man?
giphy.com/gifs/37Ez5CZ8P0jSM
You skipped the part that goes something like "and who does she play in this movie? Ryan. The name of a TH-camr that makes abstract connections like this."
"The film 'Gravity' should be renamed 'Zero Gravity'."
In Japan, the title IS "Zero Gravity."
matthew david jarvis the two forces counteract each other creating essentially 0g or microgravity as more of a scientific term
On the man made objects part shouldn't the craft itself produce gravity? if so does that mean that if we create a space craft a few miles long could it have small objects orbit it? That would be pretty neat as a gravitational tether to the craft
matthew david jarvis so if we found a way to push a black hole around we could use it as a fairly strong gravitational tether say the mass of earth id say it would be around the size of a apple maybe? That would provide a good gravitational well for things to orbit it and probably a nice way for making a craft have earth like gravity one problem I would see is that it would tear someone to sheds if you think about it because earth’s crust is as close as we can get to the gravitational center so it would give WAY more room to get close and at those forces it would tear the ship apart and eat it so maybe the size of the moon that would be around the size of ball with an inch worth of diameter that would make a great basis for a deep space craft it could be built into the shape of a ball then excuse my nonsense but I find gravity a very interesting topic to talk about and I wonder if we will ever find a way to produce matter with anti gravity properties
matthew david jarvis thx newton youre about 300 years late tho, gravity has kinda evolved since then
@@hdunn8589 No, that's wrong. You feel pretty close to the normal level of gravity in orbit.
I'm going to "well, actually" here and note that 1) The Chinese pod is a copy of the Russian Soyuz she flew to the station, so she wasn't pushing buttons completely at random, just doing it by memory; and 2) the Soyuz is in fact _designed_ to land on solid ground (in Kazakhistan, specifically.) It fires retro-rockets just before landing to cushion the impact, and in fact we see those rockets fire a moment before it hits the water.
Also,the fact that we enjoy sci-for people in sci-if space more than real people in real space is actually either a sin on the viewers or complimenting the movie for being more interesting than reality.
Then again,why do we enjoy sci-fi stories on sci-fi Earth more than the stories our friends tell us?
Don't they even float as long as one doesn't open them?!
Oh, sure. The Soyuz was designed to make emergency water landings if necessary. I was responding to the "sin" about the luck of hitting a lake for a safe landing vs. a deadly crash on land.
AubriGryphon
I think you need to take another look at the movie's plot.
That's no more luck than she deserved.
AubriGryphon Ah ok. Yeah I wouldn't consider it a sin either. After all, what, like 2/3 of the earth's surface is covered in water?!
To be honest, the one part that REALLY got me mad was the part where Kowalski is telling Ryan to let go, as if some invisible force were pulling him. When I was watching the movie, even I was screaming "DUDE, ALL RYAN HAS TO DO IT TUG ON THE ROPE AND YOU'LL GO FLYING BACK TO HER!!!" For me, that was the biggest plothole.
And I agree, she could've landed anywhere on Earth! Heck, she could've landed in the middle of the Pacific ocean.
***** Oh. I didn't know that! Thank you!
***** There's no such thing as centrifugal force
DIM0RI ...wow.
This movie was an absolute piece of shit to anyone that watched even a single documentary about space. Couldn't watch past about 1 hour in.
TheStealthWarrior Well Neil deGrasse Tyson liked it and I think he's done more than just watched a documentary about space.
"i hate space"
then why tf did you become an astronaut?
Asian parents
Opinions change with time...
the same reason why people go to work because they have too. fucking moron
@@toomanysandwiches8665 but astronauts hating space is a different thing because unlike somebody working as a cashier because they have to make money and nobody takes them hating there Job makes sense but you don't become a astronaut because you have too and make money normally astronaut become astronauts because they like space
shes not a f astronaut shes a doctor she came up just to fix smthg
They forgot to mention when the pod landed in the water it was far from any land, but when she resurfaces, the beach is literally a few yards away.
It's pronounced data.
No, it's pronounced data.
You're both wrong, although those are listed as optional pronunciations. The correct pronunciation is "DAY? DUH! DAMN!"
Tregeta no man it's pronounced data
Adiga MAXIMUS what language do you speak.....what country do you think they pronounce it right in? In england its "day-ta"
Zoo-Wee-Mama it was a joke
YOU FORGOT A SIN! At the very end, when you see Ryan Stone floating up to the surface of the ocean, she is in at least 50 feet of water. But when she surfaces, the water is quite shallow.
Also, Niel deGrasse, people enjoy this movie better than actual NASA footage because you can feel the suspense and the cinematography makes it as if you were in space yourself!
Despite that, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR FINALLY DOING THIS MOVIE!!!
... why would you feel like you're "in space yourself" by watching greenscreen CGI and NOT feel like it when you're watching videos of ACTUAL SPACE?
The quality is not as good. But I still respect the astronauts who go into space. :D
So the quality of fake space is better than actual FUCKING SPACE!? What? So you'd rather see green screen scuba diving than real footage?
The Action Brick You obviously haven't seen, or even searched for high resolution images of images taken in outer space. Plus, as said before, no matter what, nothing beat the real footage.
LloydieLynn Videos and images of actual space are awesome.
But, it's much easier to present space in a relateable way with digital photography. Like in the shot where we see an astronaut, a space station, the sunlit side of earth, the dark side, the stars AND the aurora borealis.
no camera yet exists that can capture all of those entirely different things simultaneously. Different light settings on the camera to get a clear image of an astronaut would make the stars behind invisible.
CGI is better suited to show us what really is there, and give us a proper sense of the emotional impact of being there, than actual cameras. in many ways (not absolutely always, of course)
The only blatantly unrealistic scene I had a problem with was Clooney saying she had to "let go" so they don't both get dragged away. Huh? She had already grabbed and stopped him. There wasn't any force pulling him away anymore.
They could have done the same scene but made it realistic by not grabbing Clooney in the first place. He's hurling towards her, sees her foot is barely caught in the cable and that the slightest jolt would send her flying into space, and purposely retracts his hand so that she doesn't grab him as he flies by, knowing that he would doom them both if he grabbed her.
You should remove the last sin, since all Chinese space craft are designed to touch down on land, water landing is only a backup option.
And Russian spacecraft. Basically same design.
@@kevinzheng7373 especially because she re entered in a soyuz
@@jenniferreyes2865 she reentered in a Chinese Shenzhu
She had to abandon the Soyuz as she got to the Chinese station
Granted, the Shenzhu is a cheap Soyuz knockoff, and they look very similar (besides the mad lack of handrails on the Shenzhu)
But having to abandon the Soyuz to get to the Shenzhu is a big deal in terms of the plot
George Clooney comes back from the dead to suggest it and everything
@@347Jimmy it's not a knockoff, more like technology transfer. USSR helps China a lot in their early space program. Since most of the world aligns with the US, and China is a communist country, USSR have a lot of incentive to help.
@@bltzcstrnx not since the Sino-Soviet split. Mao's China and the USSR stopped being friends during the Krushev years
What about that thing at the end, where she just stands up and starts walking without any kind of trouble? Don't astronauts have to adjust to gravity after being in zero-G for so long? Or did I get my facts wrong?
I think you are correct with this
Most astronauts have health problems over time because of the amount of time they've had being in zero gravity.(Not correcting, just adding)
That's true. Astronauts who lived on the ISS definetly have to reajust to a normal life on earth after half a year in zero-G.
But these issues only emerge after such a long time in space. I guess she was just a few days tops up there and the first problems with walking ect. only appear after about 1-2 weeks.
So I wouldn't consider this tiny fact an unrealistc fact. The rest of the film however is sadly rediculous, which is a shame since it is so well done in its pictures.
Stone explicitly says in the movie that she'd only been up there a week
wow, I did not know that you actually grow in space. Now that i think of it, that would make sence, with lack of gravity... Or is it for a different reason? i'll have research it:)
Will Smith Fights Off Alien Apocalypse = No Oscar
Leonardo DiCaprio Jumps Through Dreamscapes = No Oscar
Harrison Ford Aids In The Overthrow Of Galactic Empire In One Of Hollywood's Most Famous And Successful Franchises Of All Time = No Oscar
Sandra Bullock Floats Through Space = OSCAR OSCAR OSCAR
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This. This right here. This is bullsh*t.
What are you talking about? Inception and Star Wars won many Oscars.
Thomas Jiang Not my point. Even if the movies recieved oscars, the actors did not. Harrison Ford recieved no Oscars for star wars, Leonardo DiCaprio recieved none for Inception, and Will Smith has never recieved any to my knowledge either. Meanwhile,Sandra Bullock grabs one for Gravity, a fictional movie about falling through space.
I'm just a little miffed that three great actors in three separate movies with creative takes on different subjects didn't get squat, while an actor i'm not particularly fond of gets one in a movie where the screenwriters took probably 5 seconds to come up with a plot. It just seems kinda lazy
samuelbrowning88 The thing is, Oscars look for performances or roles that show great emotional range or ones that are very commanding. The performances that you listed are great no doubt, but don't show much emotional range and that's mostly because their roles don't allow for it. They're just not really typical Oscar roles.
Thomas Jiang That makes sense, but only enrages me further, because it means that an actor doesn't necessarily receive the Oscar as a recognition of skill, but rather for being in the right role at the right time. Which, I may add, is a factor they have no control over because they get selected by the producers to fill whatever role, which they can then accept or decline.
In other words, they may as well give the Oscar for best actor/actress to the damn writers for creating the emotionally complex character that the actor portrays.
samuelbrowning88 True, but at the same time, some roles just simply do not require as much skill to pull off as others. Like your Han Solo example, he's an iconic character for sure, but performance wise just doesn't take as much skill or emotional range to pull off than say Heath Ledger's Joker. It's just an easier role to play. While it is unfortunate that the Oscars are very selective, but they aren't necessarily without good reason either.
You missed a big one. When. She gets in the tangled up escape pod, you see her using the RCS positional thrusters to move the spacecraft. Once she is free and lines up the pod to go to the Chinese station, she flips out because the main fuel is empty, but she glazes over the fact that the escape pod RCS thruster controls can be put into docking mode, which allows forward and backward movement. So the whole hopping out with the fire extinguisher move was completely pointless
Can you use rcs in the final stage of the rocket? I mean it was literally just a landing pod. that may not have RCS thrusters?
@@Entreprenoob It definitely would, for stability assist during reentry. Pods are designed to fly back-end first, but RCS also helps.
Lol. Yeah. Well. It's cause she's a medical Dr and shouldn't be up there to drill on that asteroid with those roughnecks.....
Noooo it’s 70 Now
@@Entreprenoob Yes you can, you need them for docking in the final approach to a space station.
A movie scene: Is interesting
Sin counter: *plus 1*
Neil deGrasse Tyson helping you with you sins... you guys are having your cake, and inhaling it too!
I see what you did there.
Darth Revan there's an interesting answer to this coment in "EWW Cinema Sins"
Darth Revan Internet troll wastes his life watching videos he hates only to tell successful creators of said videos to get a life...
... That's racist.
Sin Count: 2
whisperienced Sentence: Go Away
Joe Kuzemsky
That she landed in water is actually the statistical likelihood of a blind re-entry, since most of Earth is water.
That she landed ten metres from the shore, however, isn't.
All of the Apollo re-entries (11-17) splashdowns in the middle of the Atlantic. If you see the footage, there is not a single hint of ground.
@@arfansthename apollo had clear and planned re-entry maneuvers. Except for 13 I think who got into serious technical issues
@@arfansthename
RE: "All of the Apollo re-entries (11-17) splashdowns in the middle of the Atlantic."
Most of the splashdowns of the Apollo missions were in the Pacific Ocean. Only two, Apollo 7 (location: 27°32′N 64°04′W) and Apollo 9 (location: 23°15′N 67°56′W), were in the Atlantic Ocean.
Reference: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splashdown#Locations
I have to correct you on 7:38. The chance of landing into water is actually larger than on land, because you know, 70.8% of Earth surface area is water.
+Stormfox But I think Russian/Chinese Earth landers are meant to land on a surface.
That being said I think it's more of a sin her landing in water so she can almost die for a fortieth time.
+War thunder Warhead isn't that system mandatory on all the pods? even spacex uses that booster on landing doesn't it?
But they use floating platforms right? Not literally in the water if I mot wrong.
+Stormfox It was only because she landed in a small lake, surrounded entirely by land.
+Stormfox Yeah but what if she landed in the middle of the ocean? He said shes lucky to land in a lake because i lake would be closer to land. There is a 97 percent chance she would have landed, stranded out in the middle of the ocean.
7:45
Regarding landing in a lake bring "lucky" : considering the Chinese escape pod is obviously modelled based on Soyuz spacecraft and Soyus is intended to land on ground and thus not good at floating in water (unlike US space capsules that have big-ass inflatable rafts to help them float correct side up)
Well, she wasn't that lucky, the capsule started to sink because she landed in a lake.
Omg Neil deGrasse Tyson's voice is like fucking gold
Cory Cashatt lol
1 year late but have you heard about Morgan Freeman?
The last sin was funny because it's true. When I was watching this movie I couldn't stop thinking "man, she cannot catch a break!"
you forgot how she was in zero-gravity for however long and meraciloisly is able to move and walk on earth
She was weak though.
yeah idek what I was trying to say
from context I would guess "miraculously"
Which for some reason is hard to type! I almost typo'd myself there haha.
Movie said she was only in space for a single week.
I actually have astronaut syndrome. In a nutshell, it's a fun name for muscle deconditioning.
Effects depend on how much muscle is "lost." Astronauts do do some exercise. She should have felt something if in space for a few months, but it wouldn't be too bad. I have it a bit more than astronauts would and I mainly feel it when using stairs.
It actually takes quite a long time to be significantly deconditioned. I spent about a year not doing much besides going to school. It wasn't great, but was in way better shape than you'd think
I think it was a good choice naming the film Gravity. Because it's the ultimate antagonist and antihero. It saves the protagonist. Gravity is the reason satellites orbit. It's why Doctor Stone wasn't flung into outer space when she was ejected (she was much slower than escape velocity). It's why she re-entered. Finally, when she dragged herself onto the beach and struggled to get up, collapsing after a push up, it's because she had weight again. Must have been an amazing feeling, hence why she giggled.
6:45 the door opening would break her god damn back
Moment of silence for Holeface Guy
Oof we watched this in class and I felt like throwing up.
@@audreyh.8284 me too we just finished it today
F
DLC resident evil type
Another sin: when astronauts in space cry, the teardrops do not fall off their faces. Because they are in microgravity, the tears just stick to their faces. Look for a video and you'll see what I mean.
I also enjoyed Gravity very much.
And it was so obvious, so obvious I noticed it right there in the cinema. :P
the whole film is about her moving on after her child died, they used space to portray the idea
They need to call this movie Breathing.
I thought I was the only one who noticed that. Every scene included at least half a minute of heavy breathing, towards the end I began rooting for her to die.
I told my whole family about the breathing, they didn't believe me. Then they rented it and finally caved in.
Greg Luke When I was watching the movie, I was screaming in my head: WILL YOU STOP BREATHING SO HARD, WOMAN?!!!
I'd rather call this movie Snoring (based on my reaction).
Astronauts not only wear socks, but a water circulating thermal suit and space diapers! Where are those when she takes off her suit?
I could see her doffing the socks to let her feet air out, but yeah...a thermal suit would be a bit much.
They always do that in movies. I still remember the leading actress in the "Planet of the Apes" reboot with her perfectly trimmed eyebrows.
While I agree with you on the thermal suit and space diapers, I kinda liked that Sandra Bullock wasn't wearing them. I would deduct at least 3 sins for the gratuitous near nudity.
Not me! Every scientific inaccuracy makes my brain hurt!
I don't watch science fiction dramas for an underwear shot. Honestly, if they put her in realistic gear, I would have been impressed.
And nope, she 100% drowned at the end there, no way she would be able to move properly after being exposed to earths gravity
YES! The most important sin in the movie and he didn't include it in the video.
Idk how long the plot had them in space, but haven't we all seen astronauts walk out of the Space Shuttle when they land? She got a lot of exercise up there, too. She would be fine, movement wise. However, she'd still drown before she got that cumbersome suit off.
No astronaut has never walked out of a space shuttle like you described...
cody6052 Sir you know nothing about Space
well actually astronauts train in water
The earth is like 65% water the likelyhood of her landing in water is actually really high lol.
71%*
She landed right next to shore, that's what was unlikely to me.
And a 30% chance is a decent chance considering, the point is weighed up with all the other variables it is unlikely.
@@sploofmcsterra4786 When I watched the movie a second time, I'm pretty sure during the end they show a map and crosshairs where the expected landing zone is. If I'm recalling correctly, the crosshairs are off the coast of Washington state.
@@Exkhaniber
RE: "If I'm recalling correctly, the crosshairs are off the coast of Washington state."
Why would a Chinese spacecraft be programmed to land off the coast of Washington state?
@@spaceman081447 Because no matter what, Astronauts are civilians and are not subject to the political whims and/or fallout of their respective countries? Like, in the real world, if a Chinese astronaut had to emergency ditch from space and landed close to the American coast, you can bet the Coast Guard would be picking him up, making sure he was safe, fed, and gotten to a hospital if he needs it. Astronauts are highly respected civilians, not military. If anyone has to emergency ditch, they would treated as a respected guest of that country until transport can be arranged elsewhere.
Also this has to be said - this was an emergency maneuver. It could have been programmed to prefer a given place, but *it's an emergency. You don't get to choose where that emergency happens or how much time you have to get over a preferred target area*. If the only re-entry angles at that moment in time took her to the middle of the Pacific Ocean, then that's what you have to deal with. If the only viable re-entry path takes her over Italy, so be it. China is big, but it isn't "no matter where in orbit you are, you can get to China" big.
Besides, you're asking about the logic of a movie. Errors happen. I saw this twice in theaters, and as I said, I paid close attention to that brief moment where the map was displayed because I was curious about this as well. It looked like she landed just off Washington State, but that map is flashed up on screen only briefly. I didn't have the luxury of watching it on DVD or Netflix and pausing it to view it, which I invite you to do actually. I'm not 100% positive of what I saw for only a fleeting moment, but I did look out for it as best I could during the experience. If you want to watch it on Netflix, pause it, screenshot it, and let us know what you find, I'd be interested to see.
2:48 is what genuinely pissed me off so much wen watching the movie i almost left. I mean REALLY? I thought Neil would have been more pissed at that. he died because physics decided not to physics any more
eh, I think thats wrong because Clooney already had a lot of momentum on him without any resistance on a path away from the station, whilst Bullock was barely stationary with the cables stuck on her feet. So he has 3 options, hold on, tug or let go. If he held on, they both would just get stuck there and die. If he tugs, he pulls her along with him, granted at a slower velocity but still away from station. So he did the last option, he resigned to his fate and let go.
At 3:01 From ND Tyson: "In zero-G, a single tug brings them together" *A SINGLE TUG!* Meaning, there was NO reason for Clooney's character to die. He'd have bounced back and they'd both continue to be in the movie...
So glad I didn't see this in theaters, or I'd have been kicked out for yelling. That moment was the last straw. UGH!
Dude, Clooney lost all his momentum the moment she caught his tether. He's stationary w.r.t Bullock which means his velocity vector is same as that of Bullock. So "a single tug should've brought them together" is the right thing to say. He would be pulling her only if the there's something pulling him and not her which is only possible if there is a miniature black hole nearby with the right amount of gravity differential.
yeah no one liked the scene stop being a little bitch
A black hole small enough to only pull on one of them would radiate away almost instantly.
This film was good but thats it, it didn't deserve so many Oscars and is still receiving way too much hype about how Amazing it is.
Best film of 2013-No
Most Overrated film of 2013-Yes
More like underrated. If 12 Years a Slave wasn't about what it was, then Gravity for sure would've won.
I know. I don't think it was good enough to make a movie out of it. A book would have been good but the movie is pretty boring to me.
Most Overrated= Frozen imo,
D3ADLYTHRUST52 Frozen is retarded.
D3ADLYTHRUST52
I understand it and all, but most of the time it is just her hyperventilating or crashing into satellites. A book you can in vision it for yourself, but watching it is boring. Trust me I am a fan of movies but sitting for all that time just gets to me.
The Biggest sin of all...Not making Neil deGrasse Tyson say, "This Scene did not contain a lapdance."
Would've been hilariously EPIC!!!
We didn't want to overstep our bounds on that one.
CinemaSins You say Thursday is "the most requested sins video of all time" but I thought "Iron Man 3" was the most requested.
PissedOffGhost Oh no. That was in the top 3 but not the most requested.
So we're just gonna ignore the insane work by the cameraman
A proverbial tip of the hat to you guys for getting Neil deGrasse Tyson to guest narrate for this.
LEVEL UP!!!
Holy shit how did no one see you here
For all the awards this movie won, this movie was really mediocre
While I do not argue it having won awards for the special effects, I felt like slapping the scriptwriters face in with that shitty script, and that is my only argument for having disliked the movie. I felt it treated its audience like a bunch of dumb half wit children (perhaps worse) who would be dazzled by sparkly effects and disregard anything else.
The annoying breathing of that actress made me hate the whole movie.
I enjoyed it as a good disaster film, like Deep Impact or The Day After Tomorrow, where dialogue is less relevant. Fun popcorn flick, lots of fun in 3D
You forgot a sin: It won 7 Oscars
That's not on the filmmakers. That's on the Academy.
It is still wrong
You realize that all of the Oscars it won were the technical ones, plus best direction, right? You can argue about whether 'best direction' was rightfully awarded, but I think it rightfully deserved all of the technical awards.
I'm not that bothered. It was mainly for visual effects, sound, etc. and Gravity deserved awards in those areas.
Daniel Abel Jacob Farrar But do its special effects were that good to won 7 oscars and a lot of nominies?
My science teacher literally is having us find scientific inaccuracies in this movie for an assignment XD
while the earth is 75% water, the lake landing is mighty convenient.
I agree, if she landed in the ocean then it wouldn't really be convenient, but because she manged to land in the lake surrounded by a ton of land, as you said; is mighty convenient.
Khrayfish Actually, from what I've read, the Chinese capsules (which are basically the same as the Russian ones) are designed to land over ground, and not water. So the lake landing was really just another strike of bad luck on her part.
Olle Rönn
But this was a Hollywood capsule, designed to land someplace to give you that OMG!?!?!, is she going to make it, place. Personally, I was hoping for a volcano or downtown Detroit.
MrBadKitty hey! i live there and It's not...that......bad?
ItsThisGuy The volcano? *trollface*
Why was this movie so hyped up? Its an hour and a half of grabbing stuff flying away
TheDeadlyAvenger I get what you're saying but that sounds like it boils down to "It had really, REALLY good greenscreen!" well, aside from George Lucas, no one else thinks that's a good thing.
Bad movie
You don't know how mad I was at the oscars while great movies were snubbed
TheDeadlyAvenger
The writers forgot one thing: When you make a movie filled with tension -- constantly placing the protagonist in danger -- make sure you make that protagonist relate to the audience. If the protagonist is trite or otherwise unlikable, then no one cares how much danger she gets in.
I was bored and looked at my watch several times wondering when the movie would be over.
Jeff Lyons
James Cameron and Avatar.
Besides, like he said, suspense, atmosphere and cinematography are what made the film. Not just green screen.
I breathed a huge sigh of relief when Neil said he really liked the movie, because I love the movie and if he hated it then I'd be doing something wrong.
You'd be "doing something wrong" just because you have a different opinion from Neil DeGrasse Tyson? That's ridiculous. Peer pressure is horrible, do not succumb to it. Follow-the-leader is not a fun game.
LloydieLynn
Obvious sarcasm isn't obvious!!! *To some*
LloydieLynn Bullshit that was my favorite game. Especially the part where we followed uncle mike into the dark closet for secret tickle time.
LloydieLynn But...Neil deGrasse Tyson!
Jordan Jacobaon I fucking died
this movie, even with all of its flaws, was one of the most spectacular movie experiences I've had in an IMAX theater.
I hate how everyone's claiming that this is stupid, it cinema SINs this is what the channels about , finding stupid and often valid problems with movies. Just because you enjoyed the film doesn't mean it's perfect
Still think their overdoing it with how long these videos are now.
Damian Clark
That's the point.
I actually like the longer vids
Sin #52 is the best sin.
It's a disgraces what has become of our space exploration. The space race began in 1955, 14 years later in 1969, humans landed on the moon, it's been 45 years since that great moment, yet we are pretty much stuck in that same position we were in 1969. Sure we sent tons of satellites and unnamed craft since, but human exploration has been stuck in 1969.
Kennedy announced the man would walk on the moon in 1961 they did it in less then 10 years, what have we done since? We have pretty much all the technology and knowledge to send people to mars, yet we are much happier to wage war with each other. The human mind needs expanding, you know what will give us the next computer or internet, space exploration. Space exploration makes people think, they can think of things we can't even imagine yet, feeding our minds helps every single other aspect of our lives and planet.
What? We're less than a decade from sending people to Mars and we now know about dark energy and are a good way to knowing what dark matter is. We've made plenty of progress in the space department.
Mastikator
We knew how to send them them to mars 10 years ago. Also while there have been great discoveries since the moon landing very few of them are actually discoveries that help us get to mars.
rjh00 We are missing technology that enables us to withstand or block the radiation that we come in contact with while transporting to mars
Didn't they say we were sending people to mars?
Why the everlasting fuck do you think they're developing the Orion Spacecraft, the SLS, and the asteroid capture initiative thingy? Not to mention SpaceX's Red Dragon mission, or all the other stuff that's being developed by various countries?
New sin,if they orbit earth every 90 minutes, the debris would be orbiting every 90 minutes the other way, then they would be meeting the debris every 45 minutes, stuff In space doesn't stay still,
More accurately, the stuff in space was clearly traveling at a different velocity to every object she was at, so why did they always intersect? Anybody who knows anything about physics should know better than that.
+Yitzi Schweitzer True.. they would have different orbital periods and the number of actual interceptions would be low.
+Lillian Winter KSP?
Yitzi Schweitzer A bit.
+Wesley D. Well, then it would have a relative velocity of roughly 15 kilometers per second. You wouldn't even see the debris go by.
Also, how is there that much retrograde junk in the same orbit, in the same plane, same orbital period, and an intersection with three different locations with people or a person on-site in less than 72 hours? Retrograde satellites aren't very common because you fight the rotation of the earth.
“Half of North American just lost their Facebook.”
“This is not a bad thing!”
Best line of the video.
Plus, when she cries, tears fly away from her face.
Liquids tend to "stick" to solid objects. In fact, an astronaut, almost drowned because of this...
www.space.com/22485-italian-astronaut-spacesuit-leak-video.html
Yiannis Psomiadis Yes, there’s no crying in space, just like “there’s no crying in baseball!”
let’s see if you get that reference....
The mistake" Even with a population of 1 inside the escape pod, even now a man gets credit for the women's idea" made me laugh :)
Lol, me too, I can see some angry feminazis getting a bit touchy about that
***** Same but it isn't sexist at all it's just a joke :)
***** Agreed haha
I'd like to point out that I'm happy Neil deGrasse Tyson liked the movie despite the factual errors. This comment at the end is something that people seem to forget when watching Cinema Sins (at least people unfamiliar with the series). Just because there are errors in a movie, doesn't mean you can't enjoy it. Every movie has errors; both factual and production errors. No movie is without sins. Just because you point out errors in a movie doesn't mean you don't enjoy it. I'm sure the guy who runs this channel likes quite a few movies he's gone through, but as with deGrasse Tyson, he's not stating his opinion. He's stating errors.
"Why we enjoy a Sci-Fi film in make believe space more than we enjoy actual people in actual space"...completely agree with NDT on this. If you want to see some cool shit, watch the ISS live stream on the NASA channel.
> Why we enjoy a Sci-Fi film in make believe space more than we enjoy actual people in actual space
Well, maybe because this film, while set in space, is about people and not about space?
@@Ur_Quan yeah, such a dumb take. The thing is literally made for entertainment
It’s because the characters are just so captivating and heartwrenching…
(sarcasm)
@@Ur_Quan Plus we don't want to watch a 5 hour stream of Dragon approaching, lining up and docking with ISS.
Tyson is one of my heroes- was totally awesome to have him in your video. His Star Talk radio show is great too. Great video, as usually. Keep them coming!
as far as that comment about the astronaut telling a medical doctor what is happening to her when she is breathing CO2, you'd be surprised what you can't remember in a panic situation, especially when the panic situation includes oxygen deprivation
yeah. the chatter was just to keep the gears turning
@@chironthefloof2920 Also, she's not a medical doctor, she has a PhD in biomed engineering.
I've seen several critics comment on the implausibility of Stone's daughter's death. Life is unfortunately like that - humans are at the same time incredibly durable (e.g.: a woman testifying against her attacker with a .357 slug still lodged in her brain) yet incredibly fragile (e.g.: landing badly from a running fall).
Honestly just make a video of everything right, it will save us 9 minutes and 37 seconds.
Aaron Damn good roast dude
Its called cinema wins
@@FoxItUp1111 I don't think you got the joke.
racist in space? Spacist?
Race? 🙂
Spracist 😂
I read this in cinemasins voice
rk kwc 🤣🤣🤣
I think that Cinemasins should expand and create a video game sins channel, so then they are 1 step closer to world domination.
What about music sins xD
UberInfiniteGaming YESSSSSS!!!!!!! GOOD IDEA!
How about TV series sins ?
They've already had a conversation video about this you morons
They already have a gaming sins
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
I know it is an old one, but I still go into a mini nerd rage every time I think about the ice sinking because it got blown up....
Movies are to tell stories, not represent reality.
If you're going to movies for reality you're going for the wrong reason!
Jake Heuft ok do you see what this comment is posted on?
are you just following me around so you can find some way to tell me i am wrong?
I posted a suggestion on a video about tearing apart the mistakes in movies.
This is not sherlock level stuff here.
Who says they're mistakes? MOVIES AREN'T REAL LIFE... Do I have to explain that to you?! Apparently I do!
You're comparing the movie like it HAS to match up to real life... Like fantasy is somehow directly influencing reality because it must match up to it...
Did you ever watch the actual original GI-Joe? I did all the time! I never once ever equated it with anything involving reality. It's early crude storytelling to young children. It's written ALL over the screenplay for the movie, apparently you did miss it even in the modernization.
I agree with Tyson, he points out the mistakes PERFECTLY...
He destroys the layers the film makers create to tell a story in the process.. Science can not tell beautiful stories.
Go ahead, show me a visualization of a modern scientific process that doesn't have the tag line "Artist impression" bellow it...
You're conflating reality and fantasy out of context.
0:20 - Gravity depicts a dystopian future in which we're not only still using the Space Shuttle, but in fact built a 6th orbiter!
I watched this movie with a Russian girl. She was pissed from the very beginning where it was Russia's fault satellites were crashing into each other. I did not get laid that night.
What did she think of Red Dawn (the original) ?
Mark Heisenbadger Yeah, I want to know this too.
Kid Wallace
Dammit. I was expecting a humorous answer.
Mark Heisenbadger
Ugh, as was I.
LMAO...I feel bad for u xD
I totally want to see this movie now, just so i can comeback and watch this! Neil deGrasse Tyson FTW!
Believe me, it's worth it. The movie was spectacular. Excellent use of CGI unlike some movies. YOU HEAR ME, LUCAS?!
At least Lucas doesn't own them anymore...
On a note about cgi, if you thought 2004 Jabba the Hutt was bad, google the one from 1997...
StarRider88 If you see it on bootleg and use fast forward...It is cool...I watched the whole movie in like 20 minutes.
Dingle Barry No, it was an IMAX 3D experience. And just like Cinemasins, i f*cking hate 3D. The sin is on you.
You could stare at a wall. That'll be a lesser waste of time.
Clooney said the Chinese ship had the same plan as the Russian, So Bullock had an idea of what button to hit.
As Enigma would say, “The experience of survival is the key to the gravity of love.”
Sin on you, Cinema Sins, for not making more use of Neil DeGrasse Tyson's awesome voice.
the worst part for me is that Gravity won the best sound effects award in oscar when there IS NO SOUND IN SPACE!
Why wasn't there a bonus round for Dr. Stone saying: "NONONONONO!"?
idk why i came here thinking I’m going to watch neil tyson roast Newton’s laws of gravity
BEST POSSIBLE COMBINATION EVER
Fuck yeah, hitchens!
BadGamer Hell yeah, glad someone recognises Hitchens!
i used to have the same pic as my avatar, still do on facebook
BadGamer Sweet. Long live the legacy of Hitch.
"The film Gravity should be renamed Zero Gravity" haha Neil deGrasse Tyson got me on that one.
loved Gravity, despite all the inaccuracies
Ro Jasen
The screwed up a lot of things (not that all other sci-fi movies get it right). But other movies you can forgive for great story or characters. None of them in this movie.
I'd rather watch IMAX's 3D movie about real Hubble telescope.
Oh yeah, it's beautiful and intense, despite the mediocre acting and predictable story line. However, very cool and intense a lot.
Shane Benjamson
Umm, I didn't notice any storyline in there ...
***** Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson seems to disagree with you... and he's something of an authority on these things...
***** Riiiiiiight.... I'm sure you, ah, "im" very smart....
You forgot a few crucial things:
She only has seconds, yet decides to count down before pushing a button.
She lands in water. Her suit should protect her from it and Grant her oxygen, and she could walk to the shore, yet she decides to take off the helmet so her heavy suit sucks in heavy water, so she unnecessarily almost drowned while fiddling with the suit. 71 total
How Gravity SHOULD have ended: Bullock struggles to swim free of her sinking capsule, staggers ashore ...
.....and is trampled by a Hippo. ;-)
And then... an airplane crashes on top of the hippo.
msixthree ....or a burning chunk of satellite! LMAO X-D
msixthree sjzsnbs x ccfgdsrrv3 jki
KlunkerRider
Death by HBO.
Mark Heisenbadger I thought killing off characters was Fox's thing?
"Movie expects us to believe any woman would run off on George Clooney" I lost it
This movie kept hitting you over the head so much with more and more dangers just as she had escaped the last one, I was genuinely expecting there to be a lion or a cannibalistic tribe waiting for her on the shore when she got out her spacecraft..
1:32 "This happens for quite some time, so go ahead and get your refill of popcorn and soda here."
...but the movie just started.
Everyone finishes their food during the trailers
3:00 I'm so glad someone pointed this out. The first time I watched this movie, it bugged the hell out of me why she didn't just pull Clooney towards her.
thats cuz in zero g, momentum vectors doesnt go out the instant you grab something, rather ramp down over time
I assumed it was centrifugal force.
@@Seldomheardabout Angular momentum.
"That's called having your cake and inhaling it too." - Going out on a limb here, is that the single best one-liner in the entire history of Cinema Sins? I think it is!
I don't care if she's hallucinating, the fact that a medical doctor really believe Clooney's character can come back from the dead after being without propulsion and oxygen in the middle of space and open her pod without a sass and doesn't kill her in the process is a mind blowing sin...
She's hallucinating which means that she wasn't THINKING STRAIGHT
Remember right before that when she turned off the O2 in her pod? Her brain was frying. I'm surprised Clooney wasn't purple and sipping a mohito.
In a dream the weirdest stuff can happen but you will realize it first after you woke up.
You do know that doctors are humans to, therefore things that happen like a hallucination to normal people ALSO happens to people who have a degree in medicine. A degree doesn't make you a computer.
Not just that, but the Soyuz spacecraft doesn't even have a hatch there. An obviously dead astronaut entering through a nonexistent hatch and Bullock's character being OK after just being exposed to vacuum? Dead obvious it's a hallucination.
I love this channel so much. Dude. The joy the last few vids I watched gave is priceless.
Tons of sins in the movie, no doubt, but I honestly loved it anyway.
Because it only takes eight seconds to remove a spacesuit, you won't be killed by 700 mp\h space debris, and you can totally survive everything portrayed in this movie. 10\10 would not watch again
uhhh good science?
Thank you for the great advice GLaDoS! Now can we get back to testing?
Caleb Montgomery
GlaDos is how you spell it. learn to spell. or she will send the neroutoxin.
GLaDOS*
GLaDOS
GLaDOS wow, weird name.
PLEASE DO INTERSTELLAR PLEASE! ALTHOUGH THE MOVIE WAS ENJOYABLE AND MADE ME FEEL WAVES OF EMOTIONS, THERE WERE SOME ROOKIE MISTAKES THAT I COULDNT HELP BUT NOTICE.
Maxine Clifford there were a shit ton of sins in it
Maxine Clifford So is Interstellar Great, good, just ok? I'm not sure if I want to see it or not.
Amazing film
Bret Vines It's absolutely worth seeing. I'm not the biggest fan of matthew McConaughey either, but damn it was just so good. It's an absolute mindfuck lol.
Bret Vines Mediocre movie
My only criticism on this video is that there was no mention of how often she took her helmet off despite hull breaches being imminent. As if having the helmet off helped her do anything except add to panic scenes
3:23 m you missed one, Clooney asks "You see that white dot? Yeah, she exactly knows which dot you are talking about, IN SPACE.
I don't understand all the love Gravity got, sure it's a nice movie and it looks great, but it's not the best movie ever made.
It's very boring, not because it's about space and science, space and science are amazing subjects and far from boring, but the movie is just talking for 2 hours, with many aspects that just don't make sense or are terribly wrong. Gravity is a nice movie, but please don't think that it correctly represents space, astronauts and science.
In other words it was shit! 😊
TopFilm5s
Sure it was shit to me, but I don't really think people are stupid for liking it, I do think it's stupid for loving it and thinking it's the best movie this year/ever.
There are people that can make a movie where it's just them alone for the majority of the movie, like Tom Hanks in Castaway, but Sandra Bullock in Gravity is not one of them.
*****
Except she would have pretty much died way before she even got the the capsule.
***** 1. she should have. 2. it wasn't an actual plot. 3. if there was a plot, its the most ridiculous plot ever. :)
Apollo 13 shames Gravity.
LOL George Clooney looks like Buzz Lightyear
Live action Toy Story confirmed because of your comment.
StarRider88
Half-Life 3: A Toy Story confirmed
Dr. Flopper, PhD My god...
StarRider88 (takes glasses off)
Dr. Flopper, PhD Toy Life 1/2 confirmed.
I saw the movie before I went and watched this video, and I was already sinning the hell out of it while watching it. If I were watching alone, instead of with my friends, I would've grabbed an actual bell, and ding it everytime I noticed an inaccuracy or a plain sin.
No sin for the Canadarm getting destroyed?
NOOOOO not the Canadarm!
But there seriously should have been. In Space Cowboys, when Ethan tries to do Dr. Corvin's job, I wasn't mad at him for destroying a multi-billion dollar satellite or basically getting Hawk killed. I was mad because he broke the Canadarm.
NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON!!!
Interstellar > Gravity
No
Ethan Hendren Yes
+Ethan Hendren yes
Yes
+WANTZiN yes
7:37 Described landing in water instead of ground as being the "one of the luckiest escapes in movie history" - not really, the Shenzhou, like the Soyuz it's based on, unlike American space capsules, is designed to land on dry land, which is why it has those retro-rockets. It can land in water safely, but land is preferable. What's really lucky though is that this water landing was near the edge of a lake rather than in the middle of a huge ocean.
Also, a "what's the damage" for this movie would be hilarious. Probably the most expensive other than those that involve entire cities or the whole Earth being destroyed. Possibly among the highest damage per death of any movie.