Sennheiser mke 2 lav, sanken cos11d, countryman b6, dpa 6060 for lavs, Sennheiser G4 or Lecteosonics for wireless transmitters with a mixpre II series will change your mind. 😊
@@DeeTravaughn Depends on how you look at the 10-20%. If you just think of it as capturing usable audio, then yea it’s not worth it. If you look at it as time savings then that’s big. Remember, 32bit float has nothing to do with audio quality, picking up excessive bg noise and etc. It seems that you do run and guns so you won’t need to send a mix to the producer, director or client. But here’s where you will really see the difference, in post production. If you do it yourself and want to get the great mids and lows that has the client sounding natural, this system doesn’t deliver that well unless you spend a lot of time cleaning up and EQing. Even then, it still won’t come close to other systems. The other equipment I suggested is better at capturing more natural sounding audio which will minimize the time in post. The most valuable thing is time. Butttt! If your client is happy with the Rode quality, disregard everything I say. But there are some clients that will require way more because they have their own editors and they themselves don’t want to spend too much time on one project fixing it in post.
I currently have a rode video mic pro plus, and have been looking at this mic. I was wondering if the video mic pro plus still has a place in my camera if I was to get the rode wireless? Just wanted to get your thoughts
Thanks for the video sir
Sennheiser mke 2 lav, sanken cos11d, countryman b6, dpa 6060 for lavs, Sennheiser G4 or Lecteosonics for wireless transmitters with a mixpre II series will change your mind. 😊
Sounds like a lot of moving parts for maybe a 10-20% improvement.
@@DeeTravaughn Depends on how you look at the 10-20%. If you just think of it as capturing usable audio, then yea it’s not worth it. If you look at it as time savings then that’s big. Remember, 32bit float has nothing to do with audio quality, picking up excessive bg noise and etc.
It seems that you do run and guns so you won’t need to send a mix to the producer, director or client.
But here’s where you will really see the difference, in post production. If you do it yourself and want to get the great mids and lows that has the client sounding natural, this system doesn’t deliver that well unless you spend a lot of time cleaning up and EQing. Even then, it still won’t come close to other systems. The other equipment I suggested is better at capturing more natural sounding audio which will minimize the time in post. The most valuable thing is time.
Butttt! If your client is happy with the Rode quality, disregard everything I say. But there are some clients that will require way more because they have their own editors and they themselves don’t want to spend too much time on one project fixing it in post.
Solid review bro, might have to upgrade my lab mics
Thank you bro. Solid decision
Thanks for the review bro 🔥🔥🔥
No doubt 🤝
I currently have a rode video mic pro plus, and have been looking at this mic. I was wondering if the video mic pro plus still has a place in my camera if I was to get the rode wireless? Just wanted to get your thoughts
I think it still has a place. It would be similar to what I do with booming the microphone overhead for interviews or run and gun on the gimbal.