CITIZENS OF HISTORY! Decorate your walls with a Simple History Premium Print today: electrify.art/collections/simple-history and don't miss out-grab a 25% discount now!
@@xvoidfight1889 I live in the US, most people assume when they talk about their grandpas in the war they were on the allied side, so when they say My grandpa downed 10 German fighters they think the persons grandpa as an allied fighter pilot. The joke ends up being one of those unexpected twist endings.
Not really an idiot, but more of an arogant fool, was Augustus Adolphus of Sweden, who was killed because he refused to wear glasses. During a battle he lost sight of his own troops and rode on his horse towards what he assumed were friendly soldiers. They were not.
To be fair, glasses with corrective lenses were just appearing at the time meaning he probably wouldn't have access to them and glasses before that were just not worth the risk of loosing your eyes if they broke during battle.
Camp followers were common practice in pre-industrial wars. They took care of logistics - foraging/preparing food, repairing clothes/weapons/shoes, medical care, etc. The Romans also had relatively good relations with the Germanic tribes in the area at the time, they thought they were still in friendly territory.
All major nations did that back then. Look up the Briton’s revolt. They did the same thing when facing the Romans. Modern logistics did not exist back then. So having servants and families along allowed for maintenance and support for the Soldiers.
Well if the threat to your life is that a torpedo might be hitting the ship you are on, up on deck is probably safer than inside. Going overboard and treading water until rescued is probably a better strategy for him than being stuck inside a room he can't get out of. He did a lot of swimming after his legs stopped working as a means of getting at least some type of exercise in.
To put things in perspective, I cannot think of any dreadnought that was sunk by a single torpedo hit. I mean, had the torpedo hit, it was not funny business and probably many men could have died. But it would have been very unlikely that the ship would have been sunk. And even in that case it was probably safe to assume that FDR could have been safely evacuated in a raft.
@@Manco65 All torpedo ordnance during WWII was designed by the Naval Undersea Warfare Center and manufactured at government ordnance plants. The Mark 14 torpedo had some design flaws, but it was not because it was 'built by the lowest bidder', it was because of the technology at the time.
Stalin did that in 1937, Hitler invaded in 1941. 4 years is not exactly what i would call "right before". And those generals were plotting treason against Stalin so in that context it was a good decision. Besides..did Russia ever really had good generals? Zhukov is bassicaly the only Russian general that anyone can think of and even he won his battles by throwing waves and waves of cannonfodder against the Germans.
Fun fact: Brazil and Argentina went to war multiple times over Uruguay before Paraguay decided to piss both of them. After that both countries never fought angain. Solano should at least have waited until the next war before atacking one of the larger countries.
I kinda expected Konrad von Hötzendorf to be on this list, but when I saw Cadorna being there I remembered "Oh yeah, there was that one guy that made him look almost competent" XD
Yeah, or Santa Ana. Even Crassus, who just defeated Spartacus but met his end with the Parthian Empire. He was a very wealthy man it is like the owners of Tesla, Facebook, and Microsoft were given an army to do due battle.
Francisco Solano Lopez doesn’t belong on this list! He had a smaller, more elite force than Argentina and Brazil and his plan, on paper, was sound. Also, he suffered regular casualties for the time period but is seen as a butcher because Paraguay already had a small population!
Tbf 2 years is a reasonable amount of time to judge someone's ruling. Considering, you probably wouldn't want to deal with putting down rebellions in a middle of war.
Cadorna was a General made by political friends in Rome, so he was first and foremost a Roman politician. A lot of people wanted him to stay in command just a bit longer in the hopes to prove that they were not incompetent for putting him in the position, much less about proving Cadorna's competency. The series of Isonzo was THE prime example of what not to do as a commander, he kept pressing his men into the same area that was getting increasingly difficult to push due to the ever-strengthening defenses. Also because Cadorna believed Trench warfare was cowardice he very rarely ever allowed the construction or entrenchments of proper defenses. It wasn't until Diaz came into command that the Italian front was finally stabilized and the Italians actually managed to preform so much more efficiently being able to use elastic defensive tactics and proper fortifications. Diaz basically put the life of an Italian soldier to hold more worth than Cadorna ever could.
The Italian political class was clueless about war. The general they sent to conquer Abyssinia in 1896, Oreste Baratieri, did a good job wearing down the numerically superior Abyssinian forces through a Fabian strategy, but the politicans demanded he fight and win a glorious victory so they would look good to the voters. Instead, he waged the most disastrous battle ever for a European army in Africa, the Battle of Adwa, losing 11,000 out of 17,000 men. Abyssinia would remain free from European colonialism until 1936 as a result. And if you think a Fascist would do better than these inept democrats, let's talk about Mussolini's shitshow during WW2.
Not stupidity, but: * You do not want to fire generals just because of lost battles. Sometimes battles cannot just be won. And sometimes even mediocre generals win battles through numbers and luck. Certainly a defeat should cause some concern and research, but then the people at the top would have been given information from Cadorna and his entourage. * It is not that other countries'offensives in the war were doing great, either. It was assumed that the defendant would have massive advantages. * And, even after you have realized the man is stupid, firing him reflects poorly on those who chose it. So they may try just to "wait a little more" to see if something changes and there is a victory that validates the choice, or even provides for an opportunity for replacing him without linking to his incompetence ("due to health reasons the General has asked to be granted leave.")
What they kinda forget to include is the reason WHY Varus trusted Armenius he might have grown up as a hostage but he had through LONG serviced shown him self as a loyal soldier of Rome through many campaigns so when warned by a stranger whom would you trust? The man whom have fought at your side for years and even saved your life a number of times. OR the stranger whom come in and tell you that he is a traitor?
11:13 I love the fact that even when the Mongols were bloodthirty, they weren't shy to use a pen. Which makes the dumbass emperor killing their messenger even dumber
Brazil did not exactly invade Uruguay, Emperor Pedro II supported the Colorados in the civil war and Solano Lopez supported the Blancos. The Colorados won and joined the Triple Alliance due to a debt with Brazil.
Uruguay was having a civil war, brazil intervened after rumours of brazillians being targeted by one of the sides, they didnt invade uruguay Then Solano invaded brazil and tried to send his troops to uruguay via argentina to help his allied side of the uruguayan civil war
Uruguay was NOT having a civil war. Brazil provided support to a uruguayan general to start one, due to Uruguay trying to leave Brazil's sphere of influence. The rest is correct.
@Vinlaand how so? What about the blancos vs colorados? It was a political unrest that then turned into a civil war. In wich Brazil supported the colorados... While Solano the blancos. He invaded Brazil becaused he feared that if the colorados won, uruguay would stop giving paraguay access to the sea by the plata river
It is I think. Not to mention that all the advances in science, medicine and philosophy was lost. They put them back in the Stone Age. And the Middle East never really recovered.
18:30 The battle of Caporetto was so terrible that even today, "una Caporetto" is used as an idiom for an unmitigated, terrible disaster in Italian language. Interestingly, Hungarians also have a similar, yet less common idiom, "a Doberdo" to a terrible mess or chaos, referring to another WW1 battle with Italy.
It was a crunching defeat, but if you was in Varus situation, why wouldn't you trust a senior Roman-Germanic auxiliary pathfinder/scout leader, and his men, that served Rome faithful during 15 years time, with a excellent track record. Shall you carry out a campaign, without pathfinders/scouts with local knowledge?
@@Tripact_of_fire Rome have loots of auxiliary Cohorts, even the Emperor have a Germanic bodyguard. So your plane is to carry out the campaign, without pathfinders/scouts with local knowledge?
The Dawnson I think can be excused due to it being an acident and atempting to fix his mistake, but hes still an idiot. Everyone else on this list? Absolutly pathetic and infuriating, to the point they activly dont seem to think on the posisble consequences.
Well, the William D. Porter is often referred to as one of the most incompetent ships in US Navy history for a reason as the torpedo incident wasn't the only one the crew was responsible for. When the Porter first left port to join in the Iowa's escort, the crew failed to raise anchor properly and ended up causing severe damage to the ship next to them. Later on, an unsecured depthcharge rolled off the deck and exploded, scaring the other three ships into taking evasive action before the Porter broke radio silence (this was before the torpedo) in order to tell the rest of the fleet what happened. The William D. Porter would eventually be partially responsible for its own demise. During the Battle of Okinawa, the Porter shot down a Japanese Kamikaze plane and ended up sailing right over the wreck, which then exploded. The damage would cause the Porter to sink around 3 hours later.
Even if some people say the estimate of Paraguayan loss is too much to believe,the minimum estimates of population lost ( in general, not only male) was around 30% , with most of it being male. To put into perspective, is a percentage bigger than the population loss of Germany and the Soviet Union combined in the Second World War. And remember, it was a xix century war. No machine guns, no air strikes. Just muskets, cannons and good old cholera and malaria casualties.
Dude, you did Varus dirty 😂. Varus was a reasonable competent administrator and general. The terrible reality is that there were many commanders it could have happened to.
I mean to be fair, he did order to make the simulation that eventually lead to the accidental firing of a live torpedo so i guess he felt somewhat responsible xD
The way history and animation are combined is brilliant, and the storytelling keeps you hooked until the very end. Thank you for making history this exciting! 🏛🔥good job man
In truth Custer was one the Union army most skilled commanders winning lots of battles. In the war against the Indians, Custer pushed for diplomacy and integration than outright hostility, but was overruled by the War office. In Little Big Horn, Col. Custer was leading the initial patrol group when he got surrounded by Sitting Bulls forces. He was expecting the main US Union forces down the hill to come and releave his trapped forces, as was planned, but the commanding General opt to stay put and sent a smaller group to try to rescue Custer, obviously it failed. Custer then ordered his remaining troops to try to break through from the encirclment and reach the main Army group. Only one survived.
Have you noticed some of the worst idiots placed in command are "daddy's boys". They never develop strategies nor are trained under harsh conditions. Their synonymous to the coach's son being the quarterback of the team. Lose every time.
It’s interesting that in Italy, many squares and streets are still named after Luigi Cadorna. Historians have mixed opinions on his contributions during the war.
How did a guy who just missed the arming device on one of three torpedoes (and maybe a few other things) end up on a list with these far greater disaster makers? I'm not sure which side is to be insulted by the combination, but somebody is being snubbed!
Correction: Longbows did NOT exist during the Roman Empire. It was a Medieval era invention (about 1,200 years after Publius was even born). The best bow during the Roman Empire was the composite bow... considerably shorter range than the medieval longbow. In fact, Roman Legions rarely used bows at all and Publius would not have had many at all in his ranks, if any. The pilum and javelin were the preferred ranged weapon of Roman Legions in his time.
If you are talking about Welsh Longbow, maybe yes. But bows have existed thousands of years. See Holmegaard Bow for example. You are correct that bow was not standard weapon in legions, yet.
@@Taistelukalkkuna I referred specifically to the "Longbow". Historically they don't exist until around 633AD (Welsh) and not become more wide spread across some parts of Europe until 1,200 AD. Bows prior to that were short bows, composite bows, self bows, etc - all of which were substantially shorter in range than the earliest Welsh longbow and had drastically less armor penetration due to draw strength. Rome had NO longbows as this video stated. They had composite bows at best and archers comprised less than 5% of a typical Legion (Rome was still mostly using Pilums and Javelins for ranged combat as it was built into their tactics and formations. Archers were usually not legion soldiers themselves but mercenaries / peasants etc and were exceedingly uncommon at this point in history for Rome. It would be another 110 years before Rome began utilizing bowmen as a larger part of their army than they do here). It's important to differentiate because the Longbow is closer in time to history to Muskets (separated by only 500 to 600 years) vs 2,000+ years for Rome's composite, recurve and self bows at this time in history. The longbow to a Roman would've been almost as far fetched as the musket would've been, considering even their "artillery" mangonels would've struggled to match the range of a longbow.
The US Navy is very well known for placing blame on lowly seaman to cover for institutional idiocy, I wouldn’t be so sure the story is entirely accurate.
Here are some couple of fun facts. Firstly, I'll say about Mongols two things. In Europe, Mongol Empire reached the Southern - East Europe, almost to the Danube (taking the Pannonian Plain in Balkan peninsula). Second thing is that Mongol Empire have defeated the Ottoman Empire in 15th century. Secondly, I'll say about French Empire (about the Napoleon here two things). First thing is, when he was invading Europe, he took the Dalmatia (also in Balkan peninsula). Second thing is that when the Napoleon tried to invade Russia, he firstly helped Turks with weapons, so the Turks could start to recapture territories from Serbs in 1813. Well also during the WWII when Germany was preparing to invade Yugoslavia in 1941, the Yugoslavian fighter planes and bombers had white cross with red an blue insignia. When the planes were moving Germans thought that those are their planes, no matter how does this color scheme of Yugoslavian planes was different. 18:07 Nicola Tesla (awesome). Next time in Simple History print, put also following people. Those are: Michelle Pupin, Michelle Petrović, and Milutin Milanković.
In world war one the British stoped using the union jack as the marking on their planes because it looked to similar to the german black and white iron cross. These symbols look nothing alike if you get even a halfway decent look at them... but on a moving aircraft you frequently don't. All you have time to recognize is a vague cross shape then your brain fills in the details.
Mongol empire had already collapsed by 15th century, no way they can defeat the ottomans It’s the timurids who are a Turkic empire who defeated the ottomans
@@mattislindehag3065 Here is one fun fact also. Believe it or not, ever reported shooting down of an airplane from ground to air, occurred in Serbia during the WWI. Radoje Raka Ljutovac was the first soldier who shot down the enemy plane. It all occurred on 30th of September 1915, when Austria-Hungary empire sent 3 planes to bomb Kragujevac. Army used pistols, machine guns, and rifles to shoot down airplane. Then Radoje Raka Ljutovac decided to use the old Turkish cannon that was in storage, since it was there. He aimed a cannon towards the plane, an fired at it. Then the cannonball or shell hit the plane, and the plane crashed. After that Radoje Raka Ljutovac went to the crash site, and he saw 3 dead pilots there. When he saw them, he saluted to them. After that people were gathering to see what's going on. Then Serbian army told the citizens these things: Noting to see; Show's over; Go back to your daily life activities. Also Serbian air force did also bombed the Austria-Hungary in 1915, so they can stop their advance.
Paraguay had lost 90% male population. Maybe Hxmas 2023 should be a mention, though the good news is the population of Gaza had actually INCREASED by 2% since 10-7 !
Just few word in defence of Cadorna: 1) The Isonzo is 1 of the 2 passages throug the Alps, the second one were too tight for an army passage 2) On that front were the strongest, so make sense to attack the enemy in the only place just that large to support a campaign battle 3) Cadorna use the same strategy that every WW1 general uses (frontal attack with artillery), what other strategy he can use. With that im not defending Cadorna, but i want to show to you that, yes is cruel, very cruel, but is not entirely his fault.
Lawton Dawson: Too forgetful and careless Luigi Cadorna: Too stubborn and hot-headed Publius Quinctilius Varus: Too overconfident Muhammad II of Khwarazm: Too spoiled and self-important Francisco Sorana Lopez: Too reckless and over his head
Should do a video about the most intelligent soldiers. I pretty sure that Canadian soldier Arthur Currie would be there since he studied the battlefields to limit the losses
6:07: Is it any wonder why anyone would quote Vaas? He's one of the most iconic video game villains ever, up there with the likes of Senator Armstrong and Handsome Jack.
@ yes. That nearly ended his career and he ended up as an officer on the frontline because of that. Other blunders in WW2 were Norway, Greece, Italy. He was too inept and too drunk to make any good big decisions.
In my opinion Paraguay’s war against Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay was 100 percent fruitless because of Paraguay’s size compared to Argentina and Brazil.
"History may have its fair share of heroes, but it has twice as many fools" feels like a line from Oscar Wilde or Mark Twain. Something witty and cutting and more painfully accurate than we want it to be.
Okay so story 1 is waaaay more wild than anyone would believe. Seriously it was one screw up after another. Almost as comical as the Russian fleet in WW1 that turned into a zoo, that came "under attack" from torpedoes from numerous fisherman....
I thought the first story was that they had only prepared 2 torpedos for the exercise, so when the captain ordered a third shot it was live because it had never been intended for the exercise. Oh, but then the same ship fired on a meeting of commanding officers in Alaska, right before it was supposed to be shipped out. Not surprisingly, they decided to say nothing and let it go for the sake of their own safety.
The whole career of the William D. Porter is hilarious, I highly recommend watching the many videos people have made about it. It was simultaneously the unluckiest and luckiest ship in the Navy.
Honorable mention: Manuel Silvestre. Following the loss of their empire to the USA in the Spanish American War, Spain tried to colonize the Rif region of northern Morocco in an effort to regain prestige. The native Moroccans rebelled under Abd el-Krim, who successfully drove the Spanish back to the Mediterranean coast. The Spanish government responded by sending the magnificently mustachioed Silvestre with a sizeable force to crush the rebels. Silvestre was a man with a swaggering ego who owed his command to his lifelong friend, Spanish King Alfonso XIII. This episode in cronyism saddled the poorly fed and led Spanish troops with a monstrously arrogant commander. Silvestre dismissed his enemy as mere savages, underestimating the abilities of Moroccan soldiers and Krim. His Army consisted mainly of poorly paid and provisioned conscripts, led by officers that preferred partying, gambling, and whoring to actual fighting, and were subjected to draconian discipline and poor living conditions that sapped morale. Silvestre refused to study his enemy and his tactics and rejected the advice of soldiers who had fought previously the rebels and went out of his way to alienate the Muslim population through boorish behavior. In his pursuit of the Moorish rebels, Silvestre failed to build a stable logistical system to supply his troops, and what aupplies had reached his army were usually stolen and sold on the black market by the corrupt Spanish officer corps. He compounded all of his problems by stationing his troops in blockhouses that lacked adequate water supplies and were scattered and isolated from each other, which permitted them to be easily surrounded and captured by the rebels. On 22 July 1921, following several minor victories over the demoralized Spanish, Abd el-Krim and his army attacked the main Spanish military camp at Annual. After several hours of fighting and with supplies becoming critically low, Silvestre decided to retreat. Spanish Moroccan troops deserted and defected during the early stages of the retreat, and the poorly led Spanish troops routed into an undisciplined mob, and they were cut down like wheat by Moorish riflemen and horsemen. Silvestre suffered a mental breakdown, screaming to his men, "Run, run, the bogeyman is coming," as other officers were attempting to regroup and rally their forces. Of the 5000 Spanish soldiers at Annual proper, only 570 men aurvived, of whom 326 were taken prisoner by the Moroccans. Another 8000 soldiers would die during the long retreat of the entire army to the coast after the battle. Silvestre reportedly committed suicide by a gunshot to the head, but there is no definitive proof as his body was never recovered after the battle. King Alfonso XIII, whose love of swashbuckling men led to his patronage of Silvestre, was playing golf in Monaco when he received word of the disaster. His alleged reply was "chicken is cheap" in response to the heavy losses, a callous quote that would set in motion events leading to his overthrow almost ten years later.
I always joked on these guys, but I understand now the urge to comment first😂 you just dont have any material to base a joke on but want to seize the opportunity.
The story of the USS William D. Porter is amazing. The complete idiot is not only the torpedo man, but the whole crew during all the war. Beside the POTUS incident, it ramed another ship the first time it sailed, it accidently fired an artillery shell into the commander of a naval base garden in Alaska, shot down few US plane alongside japanese kamikazes and damaged another US waship by firing too low. It ended up destroyed by a kamikaze, but with no casualties. No US warship is allowed to be named William D. Porter ever again.
3:48 yes Cadorna was a huge Baffoon. He literally tried to attack Austria in the worst places. Now if he attacked Tyrol that does bring up harder challenges due to the very poor terrain but Italy was not prepared to attack such a position on the isonzo. Cadorna could’ve possibly just waited for proper siege artillery then do anything but a frontal assault. One of his generals Armando Diaz and his army was the only one to make progress in the isonzo river battles but Diaz was able to bring victory
Gods, can you imagine the waiting room these five would be in? TRPMN Dawson: "Well, hey. Look like as though I wasn't the worst after all." Varrus: "Er, you DID nearly kill your head of state. An accident, granted, but-" Muhammed II: "Pot, kettle. I heard Teutorborg went so badly, Varrus, that no Roman Legion bore the numerals 17, 18 or 19 again!" F.S. Lopez: *going on his latest Napoleonic diatribe to the neighbouring Cardona* GEN. Cardona: "Oh ..." *draws his sidearm* "SHUT!! UUUUP!!"
There's also Colonel Johann Rahl, commander of the Hessian troops at the Battle of Trenton, NJ, on December 26th, 1776. Prior to the battle, a Loyalist sent Rahl a note informing him of Washington's impending attack on the Hessians at Trenton. However, Rahl couldn't read it since it was in english, and Rahl REFUSED TO INTERRUPT HIS CARD GAME to find somebody to read it to him. After Colonel Rahl died from mortal wounds relieved in the battle, the note was found still in his pocket.
“Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Sounds vaguely familiar to the incoming administration and the USA’s inevitable downfall.
In this video, we'll be talking about egomaniacal dictators and generals who destroyed entire generations or entire countries. Now let's start things off with Feeble-Minded Seaman Schmuckatelli, who made a mistake that could've killed somebody, but didn't, but could've, but didn't. Yup, definitely belongs on the list.
CITIZENS OF HISTORY! Decorate your walls with a Simple History Premium Print today: electrify.art/collections/simple-history and don't miss out-grab a 25% discount now!
i’m broke 😭😭😭
Those dumb bastards
Like video
starting with the willy d
😊
This reminds me of the old joke, During WWII my grandpa downed 10 German fighters, worst mechanic they ever had.
I don't get it
@@xvoidfight1889 He was a German mechanic.
That's hilarious! Love it!
@@xvoidfight1889 I live in the US, most people assume when they talk about their grandpas in the war they were on the allied side, so when they say My grandpa downed 10 German fighters they think the persons grandpa as an allied fighter pilot. The joke ends up being one of those unexpected twist endings.
@kevindavidson8802 Oh, now it sense 🤣
Luigi Cadorna would be an excellent lesson for aspiring officers so that they can learn everything NOT to do.
If you can't be a good example, try to be AN example?
in the same way as aspiring tank designers are shown the british Valiant tank ( in Bovington museum ?) to try and find all of the many flaws.
He is in fact studied in Italian military academies with a big red lettering of "Do NOT do this, it is dumb, and if you do it you are even dumber"
Haig is worse than cadorna
Okay but imagine going down in history as the man who saved the president who ended WW2, by shooting a moving torpedo with a pistol
wait what??
@@liamhashmi7750 Didn't watch the video and went straight to the comments, huh?
Some guy tracked the torpedo with his pistol but didn't shoot
@@cartoonraccoon2078 yea pretty much lol
@@pfiction2453Technically he didn't, Truman did 🤓
*_"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."_*
- Napoleon Bonaparte
i feel like he learned that from experience.
@@linuxsuperuser Most likely from Russia 🇷🇺
Goes still Hard 🔥🔥🔥
@@PaintingWithLindy Unlikely as Napoleon allegedly said it or something very similar in 1805 at Austerlitz.
I think Sun Tzu said that.
And Napoleon you want to talk about mistakes? Let's have a war with Russia. How did that turn out?
Luigi Cardona was the best Austro-Hungarian general ever.
Best joke by far 😂 he helped Austria Hungary way more than his country italy
They should made him a national hero lol.
CadoRna, not CaRdona...
Mama mia
We must thank cadorna on failing 12 times on a insignificant river😊😊
Not really an idiot, but more of an arogant fool, was Augustus Adolphus of Sweden, who was killed because he refused to wear glasses. During a battle he lost sight of his own troops and rode on his horse towards what he assumed were friendly soldiers. They were not.
100% he was a very good leader that just made a fatal mistake that cost of him his life and more.
To be fair, glasses with corrective lenses were just appearing at the time meaning he probably wouldn't have access to them and glasses before that were just not worth the risk of loosing your eyes if they broke during battle.
He also did not wear his armor during that battle.
I was taught that it was because of a thick fog that rolled in that made him get lost and accidentally ride into enemy lines.
Guy sounds near sighted
Letting soldiers take their families with them on a large-scale suicide mission is just peak idiocracy.
1863 Civil War watchouts in a nutshell.
Camp followers were common practice in pre-industrial wars. They took care of logistics - foraging/preparing food, repairing clothes/weapons/shoes, medical care, etc.
The Romans also had relatively good relations with the Germanic tribes in the area at the time, they thought they were still in friendly territory.
Idiocy***
All major nations did that back then.
Look up the Briton’s revolt. They did the same thing when facing the Romans.
Modern logistics did not exist back then. So having servants and families along allowed for maintenance and support for the Soldiers.
Boudica did that and Lost 200,000 to 10,000 Romans trapped in a Ravine, in a Battle that would have made Nero Withdraw from Britannia if she Won.
“Wheel him to the deck for a better view”, man they don’t make em like FDR anymore.
Well if the threat to your life is that a torpedo might be hitting the ship you are on, up on deck is probably safer than inside. Going overboard and treading water until rescued is probably a better strategy for him than being stuck inside a room he can't get out of. He did a lot of swimming after his legs stopped working as a means of getting at least some type of exercise in.
To put things in perspective, I cannot think of any dreadnought that was sunk by a single torpedo hit.
I mean, had the torpedo hit, it was not funny business and probably many men could have died. But it would have been very unlikely that the ship would have been sunk. And even in that case it was probably safe to assume that FDR could have been safely evacuated in a raft.
If it was like most of the torpedoes we had at that time built by the lowest bidder it probably wouldn't have went off anyway.
@@Manco65 All torpedo ordnance during WWII was designed by the Naval Undersea Warfare Center and manufactured at government ordnance plants. The Mark 14 torpedo had some design flaws, but it was not because it was 'built by the lowest bidder', it was because of the technology at the time.
I mean getting shot in the ear and standing up and yelling, "Fight Fight Fight"! is pretty Bravo Alpha.
For the military: Luigi Cadorna and Conrad Von Hötzendorf
In general: The Politicians
Muhammad II of Kwarazm AND Francisco Solano Lopez are in
BOTH categories!!!
Hotzendorf is largely to blame for WW1
Like Churchill, Roosvelt and Stalin?
@@hernanuliana9111 that would be ww2...
Stalin firing all his best generals right before Hitler invaded Russia deserves a mention.
"firing"... that's one way to put it...
he had 90% of his military leadership killed...
How could he know Germany will invade him?
Tuchachevsky's conspiracy. Google it idk
Yeah, 'firing'; that's kinda accurate he had them shot. 900 officers in total.
Stalin did that in 1937, Hitler invaded in 1941. 4 years is not exactly what i would call "right before". And those generals were plotting treason against Stalin so in that context it was a good decision. Besides..did Russia ever really had good generals? Zhukov is bassicaly the only Russian general that anyone can think of and even he won his battles by throwing waves and waves of cannonfodder against the Germans.
"I'm surrounded by idiots"-Scar The Lion King
"I've got morons on my team!"
- Megatron, Transformers Generation 1
"I'm surrounded by assholes!"
-Dark Helmet, Spaceballs
@@TheOneManWhoBeatYou
“Keep firing, Assholes!”
I thought you were surrounded by gumdrops and ice cream!
@@Scrapyard24c Actually, I thought that was Strother Martin in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.
Fun fact: Brazil and Argentina went to war multiple times over Uruguay before Paraguay decided to piss both of them. After that both countries never fought angain. Solano should at least have waited until the next war before atacking one of the larger countries.
90% is crazy but at least he died in battle and not hiding inside a bunker.
That kinda feels like put how good he is from 1 to 1.01
@@fiyahquacker2835 truuuu lulllll
Then again bunkers didn't really exist at the time
@@PohEnYuDariusBssstrue but caves did and fortresses kinda do the same idea
@@SymphonyZach fair point
I kinda expected Konrad von Hötzendorf to be on this list, but when I saw Cadorna being there I remembered "Oh yeah, there was that one guy that made him look almost competent" XD
I'm surprised you didn't include U.S. General George A. Custer, considering the fact that he was a glory seeking egotist.
Yeah, or Santa Ana. Even Crassus, who just defeated Spartacus but met his end with the Parthian Empire. He was a very wealthy man it is like the owners of Tesla, Facebook, and Microsoft were given an army to do due battle.
Well, at least Custer was never president and did some good work in the American Civil War before.... That
Yeah you're clearly no history major lol pipe down
Francisco Solano Lopez doesn’t belong on this list! He had a smaller, more elite force than Argentina and Brazil and his plan, on paper, was sound. Also, he suffered regular casualties for the time period but is seen as a butcher because Paraguay already had a small population!
@@thomassabino13 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Who was more stupid though, Cadorna or the people who took two whole years to relieve him 🤔
Tbf 2 years is a reasonable amount of time to judge someone's ruling. Considering, you probably wouldn't want to deal with putting down rebellions in a middle of war.
Cadorna was a General made by political friends in Rome, so he was first and foremost a Roman politician.
A lot of people wanted him to stay in command just a bit longer in the hopes to prove that they were not incompetent for putting him in the position, much less about proving Cadorna's competency.
The series of Isonzo was THE prime example of what not to do as a commander, he kept pressing his men into the same area that was getting increasingly difficult to push due to the ever-strengthening defenses.
Also because Cadorna believed Trench warfare was cowardice he very rarely ever allowed the construction or entrenchments of proper defenses.
It wasn't until Diaz came into command that the Italian front was finally stabilized and the Italians actually managed to preform so much more efficiently being able to use elastic defensive tactics and proper fortifications. Diaz basically put the life of an Italian soldier to hold more worth than Cadorna ever could.
The Italian political class was clueless about war. The general they sent to conquer Abyssinia in 1896, Oreste Baratieri, did a good job wearing down the numerically superior Abyssinian forces through a Fabian strategy, but the politicans demanded he fight and win a glorious victory so they would look good to the voters. Instead, he waged the most disastrous battle ever for a European army in Africa, the Battle of Adwa, losing 11,000 out of 17,000 men. Abyssinia would remain free from European colonialism until 1936 as a result.
And if you think a Fascist would do better than these inept democrats, let's talk about Mussolini's shitshow during WW2.
Not stupidity, but:
* You do not want to fire generals just because of lost battles. Sometimes battles cannot just be won. And sometimes even mediocre generals win battles through numbers and luck. Certainly a defeat should cause some concern and research, but then the people at the top would have been given information from Cadorna and his entourage.
* It is not that other countries'offensives in the war were doing great, either. It was assumed that the defendant would have massive advantages.
* And, even after you have realized the man is stupid, firing him reflects poorly on those who chose it. So they may try just to "wait a little more" to see if something changes and there is a victory that validates the choice, or even provides for an opportunity for replacing him without linking to his incompetence ("due to health reasons the General has asked to be granted leave.")
What's your problem??!! That was a decision of the king, it was not democratic or something
Varus! Oh Quinctilius Varus! Give me back my legions!
Damn varus
"Armenius? A traitor? I think not"
What they kinda forget to include is the reason WHY Varus trusted Armenius he might have grown up as a hostage but he had through LONG serviced shown him self as a loyal soldier of Rome through many campaigns so when warned by a stranger whom would you trust? The man whom have fought at your side for years and even saved your life a number of times. OR the stranger whom come in and tell you that he is a traitor?
Atleast they didnt comitted martial law at 3am
Oh give it time the day is still young
South korea moment
I agreed!
At least they knew how to use language properly...
Theodore Roosevelt: You should be ashamed of your military honor!
👏
I won't find a better comment today this is it for sure....has never rolling ima go back and rewatch it
"Everyone know you were back home saying Thank God for Pearl Hahbar!"
You comment this on every video, and on this one it fits perfectly. I admire the perseverance.
Did he really say that?
11:13 I love the fact that even when the Mongols were bloodthirty, they weren't shy to use a pen. Which makes the dumbass emperor killing their messenger even dumber
Well, if there ever was a real-life case for 'Never kill the messenger' ...
They needed to have excuse to invade. Shah provided it.
“Don’t shoot we’re republicans!”
Other ships in the Pacific fleet to the “Willie D”
To this day, Varus still hasn't given back his 3 Legions.
Honorable mention-Sir William Elphinstone
Brazil did not exactly invade Uruguay, Emperor Pedro II supported the Colorados in the civil war and Solano Lopez supported the Blancos. The Colorados won and joined the Triple Alliance due to a debt with Brazil.
Genghis khan when his trade offerers get massacred:
Come on let's try again
King: kills the diplomat
Genshin khan: so you have chosen death
Which is fair enough. The king was just being an A-hole at that point. They could have negotiated something 💀
Uruguay was having a civil war, brazil intervened after rumours of brazillians being targeted by one of the sides, they didnt invade uruguay
Then Solano invaded brazil and tried to send his troops to uruguay via argentina to help his allied side of the uruguayan civil war
Uruguay was NOT having a civil war. Brazil provided support to a uruguayan general to start one, due to Uruguay trying to leave Brazil's sphere of influence. The rest is correct.
@Vinlaand how so?
What about the blancos vs colorados?
It was a political unrest that then turned into a civil war.
In wich Brazil supported the colorados...
While Solano the blancos.
He invaded Brazil becaused he feared that if the colorados won, uruguay would stop giving paraguay access to the sea by the plata river
13:10 low end estimate indeed, I’ve heard the population of modern day Iran is still lower than it was before Ghengis Khan invaded
Good.
It is I think. Not to mention that all the advances in science, medicine and philosophy was lost. They put them back in the Stone Age. And the Middle East never really recovered.
18:30 The battle of Caporetto was so terrible that even today, "una Caporetto" is used as an idiom for an unmitigated, terrible disaster in Italian language. Interestingly, Hungarians also have a similar, yet less common idiom, "a Doberdo" to a terrible mess or chaos, referring to another WW1 battle with Italy.
Immediately when i saw the name of Varus i said oh no. "Quinctilius Varus give me back my legions"
It was a crunching defeat, but if you was in Varus situation, why wouldn't you trust a senior Roman-Germanic auxiliary pathfinder/scout leader, and his men, that served Rome faithful during 15 years time, with a excellent track record.
Shall you carry out a campaign, without pathfinders/scouts with local knowledge?
@kirgan1000 one word "Germanic"
@@Tripact_of_fire Rome have loots of auxiliary Cohorts, even the Emperor have a Germanic bodyguard.
So your plane is to carry out the campaign, without pathfinders/scouts with local knowledge?
@@kirgan1000 i know but i think it was a mistake to do so
I agree Simple History, in war there are heroes and fools and these guys fit the the latter category.
From what I remember from the Sam O'Nella video about the USS Porter, the entire ship's crew was utterly incompetent.
That whole ship was a comedy of errors
that ship was just straight cursed.
0:30 ”peabrained prat” 😂
That tickled me to 😂😂😂😂
The Dawnson I think can be excused due to it being an acident and atempting to fix his mistake, but hes still an idiot.
Everyone else on this list? Absolutly pathetic and infuriating, to the point they activly dont seem to think on the posisble consequences.
Well, the William D. Porter is often referred to as one of the most incompetent ships in US Navy history for a reason as the torpedo incident wasn't the only one the crew was responsible for.
When the Porter first left port to join in the Iowa's escort, the crew failed to raise anchor properly and ended up causing severe damage to the ship next to them.
Later on, an unsecured depthcharge rolled off the deck and exploded, scaring the other three ships into taking evasive action before the Porter broke radio silence (this was before the torpedo) in order to tell the rest of the fleet what happened.
The William D. Porter would eventually be partially responsible for its own demise.
During the Battle of Okinawa, the Porter shot down a Japanese Kamikaze plane and ended up sailing right over the wreck, which then exploded.
The damage would cause the Porter to sink around 3 hours later.
@@Scrapyard24c Actually, only the torpedo incident and her sinking actually happened; the rest are 1990s fabrications.
Even if some people say the estimate of Paraguayan loss is too much to believe,the minimum estimates of population lost ( in general, not only male) was around 30% , with most of it being male. To put into perspective, is a percentage bigger than the population loss of Germany and the Soviet Union combined in the Second World War. And remember, it was a xix century war. No machine guns, no air strikes. Just muskets, cannons and good old cholera and malaria casualties.
Dude, you did Varus dirty 😂. Varus was a reasonable competent administrator and general. The terrible reality is that there were many commanders it could have happened to.
This is just a poorly researched clickbait piece.
3:41 bro stood up for the torpedo man dawson
I mean to be fair, he did order to make the simulation that eventually lead to the accidental firing of a live torpedo so i guess he felt somewhat responsible xD
3:46
A man unimaginative martinet who was ruthless with his troops and dismissive of his country's political authorities.
"Fool of a took"-Gadalf the white
Thought he was grey at that point.
@@TrevDri ... well, everyone's hair changes as they get older.
Guys give Gadalfs hair a break.
@@littleblackcat2273 yea but your name usually doesn't thats pretty unique.
The way history and animation are combined is brilliant, and the storytelling keeps you hooked until the very end. Thank you for making history this exciting! 🏛🔥good job man
Bedankt
The thumbnail is truly amazing
Ngl, surprised Custer didn't make it on this list for his idiocy at Little Big Horn 😅
In truth Custer was one the Union army most skilled commanders winning lots of battles. In the war against the Indians, Custer pushed for diplomacy and integration than outright hostility, but was overruled by the War office. In Little Big Horn, Col. Custer was leading the initial patrol group when he got surrounded by Sitting Bulls forces. He was expecting the main US Union forces down the hill to come and releave his trapped forces, as was planned, but the commanding General opt to stay put and sent a smaller group to try to rescue Custer, obviously it failed. Custer then ordered his remaining troops to try to break through from the encirclment and reach the main Army group. Only one survived.
"There's a torpedo coming!"
FDR: "My time has come."
Have you noticed some of the worst idiots placed in command are "daddy's boys". They never develop strategies nor are trained under harsh conditions. Their synonymous to the coach's son being the quarterback of the team. Lose every time.
I would add British general William George Keith Elphinstone and his adventure to Kabul during 19th century to this list.
I have a feeling we can soon add Putin to this list.
It’s interesting that in Italy, many squares and streets are still named after Luigi Cadorna. Historians have mixed opinions on his contributions during the war.
Italians are terrible at war so it makes sense they still honor a idiot
The ONE thing I will say about Lopez is that at least he fought to the end and died with his men.
How did a guy who just missed the arming device on one of three torpedoes (and maybe a few other things) end up on a list with these far greater disaster makers? I'm not sure which side is to be insulted by the combination, but somebody is being snubbed!
Correction: Longbows did NOT exist during the Roman Empire. It was a Medieval era invention (about 1,200 years after Publius was even born). The best bow during the Roman Empire was the composite bow... considerably shorter range than the medieval longbow. In fact, Roman Legions rarely used bows at all and Publius would not have had many at all in his ranks, if any. The pilum and javelin were the preferred ranged weapon of Roman Legions in his time.
Slings outranged bows anyways.
The Romans had auxiliaries (non-citizen soldiers) who served as archers.
If you are talking about Welsh Longbow, maybe yes. But bows have existed thousands of years. See Holmegaard Bow for example. You are correct that bow was not standard weapon in legions, yet.
@@Taistelukalkkuna I referred specifically to the "Longbow". Historically they don't exist until around 633AD (Welsh) and not become more wide spread across some parts of Europe until 1,200 AD. Bows prior to that were short bows, composite bows, self bows, etc - all of which were substantially shorter in range than the earliest Welsh longbow and had drastically less armor penetration due to draw strength.
Rome had NO longbows as this video stated. They had composite bows at best and archers comprised less than 5% of a typical Legion (Rome was still mostly using Pilums and Javelins for ranged combat as it was built into their tactics and formations. Archers were usually not legion soldiers themselves but mercenaries / peasants etc and were exceedingly uncommon at this point in history for Rome. It would be another 110 years before Rome began utilizing bowmen as a larger part of their army than they do here).
It's important to differentiate because the Longbow is closer in time to history to Muskets (separated by only 500 to 600 years) vs 2,000+ years for Rome's composite, recurve and self bows at this time in history. The longbow to a Roman would've been almost as far fetched as the musket would've been, considering even their "artillery" mangonels would've struggled to match the range of a longbow.
Composite bows outrange longbows
General Dentz, he surrendered Paris to the Germans in 1940, then he surrendered Syria and Lebanon to the Australians in 1941. He was a buffoon.
Respect to Segesties for trying to warn the Romans. A lot of Romans could've been saved and 3 Legions could've survived if not for Varros.
Just for the Record. The lance that hurted "El supremo" was The lance of a brazilian soldier called "Chico Diabo" (Chico the Devil).
LMAO .. The animation for the first "Idiot" ... hahahaha
You need to do a solo episode on "The Willie D"
Cracked already did it. Not a video hillarious.
Sam O'Nella did a video about it
The US Navy is very well known for placing blame on lowly seaman to cover for institutional idiocy, I wouldn’t be so sure the story is entirely accurate.
For real
Here are some couple of fun facts.
Firstly, I'll say about Mongols two things. In Europe, Mongol Empire reached the Southern - East Europe, almost to the Danube (taking the Pannonian Plain in Balkan peninsula).
Second thing is that Mongol Empire have defeated the Ottoman Empire in 15th century.
Secondly, I'll say about French Empire (about the Napoleon here two things). First thing is, when he was invading Europe, he took the Dalmatia (also in Balkan peninsula).
Second thing is that when the Napoleon tried to invade Russia, he firstly helped Turks with weapons, so the Turks could start to recapture territories from Serbs in 1813.
Well also during the WWII when Germany was preparing to invade Yugoslavia in 1941, the Yugoslavian fighter planes and bombers had white cross with red an blue insignia. When the planes were moving Germans thought that those are their planes, no matter how does this color scheme of Yugoslavian planes was different.
18:07 Nicola Tesla (awesome).
Next time in Simple History print, put also following people. Those are: Michelle Pupin, Michelle Petrović, and Milutin Milanković.
😊
In world war one the British stoped using the union jack as the marking on their planes because it looked to similar to the german black and white iron cross. These symbols look nothing alike if you get even a halfway decent look at them... but on a moving aircraft you frequently don't. All you have time to recognize is a vague cross shape then your brain fills in the details.
Mongol empire had already collapsed by 15th century, no way they can defeat the ottomans
It’s the timurids who are a Turkic empire who defeated the ottomans
@@mattislindehag3065 Here is one fun fact also. Believe it or not, ever reported shooting down of an airplane from ground to air, occurred in Serbia during the WWI. Radoje Raka Ljutovac was the first soldier who shot down the enemy plane.
It all occurred on 30th of September 1915, when Austria-Hungary empire sent 3 planes to bomb Kragujevac. Army used pistols, machine guns, and rifles to shoot down airplane. Then Radoje Raka Ljutovac decided to use the old Turkish cannon that was in storage, since it was there. He aimed a cannon towards the plane, an fired at it. Then the cannonball or shell hit the plane, and the plane crashed. After that Radoje Raka Ljutovac went to the crash site, and he saw 3 dead pilots there. When he saw them, he saluted to them. After that people were gathering to see what's going on. Then Serbian army told the citizens these things: Noting to see; Show's over; Go back to your daily life activities.
Also Serbian air force did also bombed the Austria-Hungary in 1915, so they can stop their advance.
@@selimcardak7799 The Mongols did defeat the Turks on Angora in year 1402. You can see the details about that on internet.
Paraguay had lost 90% male population. Maybe Hxmas 2023 should be a mention, though the good news is the population of Gaza had actually INCREASED by 2% since 10-7 !
Just few word in defence of Cadorna: 1) The Isonzo is 1 of the 2 passages throug the Alps, the second one were too tight for an army passage 2) On that front were the strongest, so make sense to attack the enemy in the only place just that large to support a campaign battle 3) Cadorna use the same strategy that every WW1 general uses (frontal attack with artillery), what other strategy he can use.
With that im not defending Cadorna, but i want to show to you that, yes is cruel, very cruel, but is not entirely his fault.
9:30 average german win
11:15 smartest Muhammed
"Pride goeth before disaster and a willful heart before a fall" -- Proverbs.
Left out Soviet generals in the early years of WWII.
Lawton Dawson: Too forgetful and careless
Luigi Cadorna: Too stubborn and hot-headed
Publius Quinctilius Varus: Too overconfident
Muhammad II of Khwarazm: Too spoiled and self-important
Francisco Sorana Lopez: Too reckless and over his head
Should do a video about the most intelligent soldiers. I pretty sure that Canadian soldier Arthur Currie would be there since he studied the battlefields to limit the losses
Pointing your pistol at a torpedo seems desperate but it's better than doing nothing. There is a microscopic chance you might achieve something.
6:08 Far Cry 3! Let's go!
When I saw "Biggest idiots in war" I expected it to be far longer than eighteen and a half minutes. History is replete with them.
6:07: Is it any wonder why anyone would quote Vaas? He's one of the most iconic video game villains ever, up there with the likes of Senator Armstrong and Handsome Jack.
Bro, the quote is way older than that game. It was even (most likely falsely) attributed to Einstein.
7:09 I'd like to imagine he actually ran away like that 😂
that luigi general is the perfect example of the sentence “so stupid even your enemy concerns”
You sure know how to title a video for us to click on
Never thought I'd hear the narrator say "Dude" in such a formal manner
What about Winston Churchill? His list of blunders is impressive
Especially, when he suggested Gallipoli operation.
@ yes. That nearly ended his career and he ended up as an officer on the frontline because of that. Other blunders in WW2 were Norway, Greece, Italy. He was too inept and too drunk to make any good big decisions.
In my opinion Paraguay’s war against Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay was 100 percent fruitless because of Paraguay’s size compared to Argentina and Brazil.
"History may have its fair share of heroes, but it has twice as many fools" feels like a line from Oscar Wilde or Mark Twain. Something witty and cutting and more painfully accurate than we want it to be.
I really hate that “definition” of insanity, is that what you do when you practice something??
Yes, but you don't expect different results.....
Okay so story 1 is waaaay more wild than anyone would believe. Seriously it was one screw up after another. Almost as comical as the Russian fleet in WW1 that turned into a zoo, that came "under attack" from torpedoes from numerous fisherman....
I genuinely laughed when this dude took hotshots at the generals
Timestamps: 4:28 5:42 6:03 (kinda) 6:29 7:31 11:20
Lopez: “If you can’t beat em, move on and try to beat someone else while you are also trying to beat the first guy. Throw a third in there, too.”
I thought the first story was that they had only prepared 2 torpedos for the exercise, so when the captain ordered a third shot it was live because it had never been intended for the exercise.
Oh, but then the same ship fired on a meeting of commanding officers in Alaska, right before it was supposed to be shipped out. Not surprisingly, they decided to say nothing and let it go for the sake of their own safety.
The whole career of the William D. Porter is hilarious, I highly recommend watching the many videos people have made about it. It was simultaneously the unluckiest and luckiest ship in the Navy.
9:45 I'm Glenn Quagmire
Perfect explanation
*giggity*
Giggity
The guy who enlisted after exiting the bar.
So most of the US military
@wesleasanchez8701 ai
That the Paraguayans followed Lopez despite such casualties does speak for his powers of persuasion, so calling him "idiot" may not be apropriate...
I'm not sure if anyone tells you this but man your thumbnails are getting better and better, Makes me laugh everytime a new vid comes out.
Honorable mention: Manuel Silvestre. Following the loss of their empire to the USA in the Spanish American War, Spain tried to colonize the Rif region of northern Morocco in an effort to regain prestige. The native Moroccans rebelled under Abd el-Krim, who successfully drove the Spanish back to the Mediterranean coast. The Spanish government responded by sending the magnificently mustachioed Silvestre with a sizeable force to crush the rebels.
Silvestre was a man with a swaggering ego who owed his command to his lifelong friend, Spanish King Alfonso XIII. This episode in cronyism saddled the poorly fed and led Spanish troops with a monstrously arrogant commander. Silvestre dismissed his enemy as mere savages, underestimating the abilities of Moroccan soldiers and Krim. His Army consisted mainly of poorly paid and provisioned conscripts, led by officers that preferred partying, gambling, and whoring to actual fighting, and were subjected to draconian discipline and poor living conditions that sapped morale. Silvestre refused to study his enemy and his tactics and rejected the advice of soldiers who had fought previously the rebels and went out of his way to alienate the Muslim population through boorish behavior.
In his pursuit of the Moorish rebels, Silvestre failed to build a stable logistical system to supply his troops, and what aupplies had reached his army were usually stolen and sold on the black market by the corrupt Spanish officer corps. He compounded all of his problems by stationing his troops in blockhouses that lacked adequate water supplies and were scattered and isolated from each other, which permitted them to be easily surrounded and captured by the rebels.
On 22 July 1921, following several minor victories over the demoralized Spanish, Abd el-Krim and his army attacked the main Spanish military camp at Annual. After several hours of fighting and with supplies becoming critically low, Silvestre decided to retreat. Spanish Moroccan troops deserted and defected during the early stages of the retreat, and the poorly led Spanish troops routed into an undisciplined mob, and they were cut down like wheat by Moorish riflemen and horsemen. Silvestre suffered a mental breakdown, screaming to his men, "Run, run, the bogeyman is coming," as other officers were attempting to regroup and rally their forces.
Of the 5000 Spanish soldiers at Annual proper, only 570 men aurvived, of whom 326 were taken prisoner by the Moroccans. Another 8000 soldiers would die during the long retreat of the entire army to the coast after the battle. Silvestre reportedly committed suicide by a gunshot to the head, but there is no definitive proof as his body was never recovered after the battle. King Alfonso XIII, whose love of swashbuckling men led to his patronage of Silvestre, was playing golf in Monaco when he received word of the disaster. His alleged reply was "chicken is cheap" in response to the heavy losses, a callous quote that would set in motion events leading to his overthrow almost ten years later.
I always joked on these guys, but I understand now the urge to comment first😂 you just dont have any material to base a joke on but want to seize the opportunity.
The story of the USS William D. Porter is amazing. The complete idiot is not only the torpedo man, but the whole crew during all the war. Beside the POTUS incident, it ramed another ship the first time it sailed, it accidently fired an artillery shell into the commander of a naval base garden in Alaska, shot down few US plane alongside japanese kamikazes and damaged another US waship by firing too low. It ended up destroyed by a kamikaze, but with no casualties.
No US warship is allowed to be named William D. Porter ever again.
3:48 yes Cadorna was a huge Baffoon. He literally tried to attack Austria in the worst places. Now if he attacked Tyrol that does bring up harder challenges due to the very poor terrain but Italy was not prepared to attack such a position on the isonzo. Cadorna could’ve possibly just waited for proper siege artillery then do anything but a frontal assault. One of his generals Armando Diaz and his army was the only one to make progress in the isonzo river battles but Diaz was able to bring victory
I'm pretty sure I played a similar battle in Battlefield 1. It was a tough fight... Damn you, Cadorna!
More like Italian idiot general
Roosevelt was a cool dude for not having that dude arrested, I know I would probably be that navy guy if I was born a few decades earlier lol
There is actually a story of a guy who blew up a torpedo with his rifle. It's a million to one chance, but not completely impossible.
Imagine being one of the 10% of men left in Paraguay.
Gods, can you imagine the waiting room these five would be in?
TRPMN Dawson: "Well, hey. Look like as though I wasn't the worst after all."
Varrus: "Er, you DID nearly kill your head of state. An accident, granted, but-"
Muhammed II: "Pot, kettle. I heard Teutorborg went so badly, Varrus, that no Roman Legion bore the numerals 17, 18 or 19 again!"
F.S. Lopez: *going on his latest Napoleonic diatribe to the neighbouring Cardona*
GEN. Cardona: "Oh ..." *draws his sidearm* "SHUT!! UUUUP!!"
There's also Colonel Johann Rahl, commander of the Hessian troops at the Battle of Trenton, NJ, on December 26th, 1776.
Prior to the battle, a Loyalist sent Rahl a note informing him of Washington's impending attack on the Hessians at Trenton. However, Rahl couldn't read it since it was in english, and Rahl REFUSED TO INTERRUPT HIS CARD GAME to find somebody to read it to him. After Colonel Rahl died from mortal wounds relieved in the battle, the note was found still in his pocket.
As a US Navy veteran, I’m not surprised the first guy was Navy. In my five years active, I met people dumber than I thought possible.
I like how the first one was a simple soldier and then all the others were either world leaders or politically connected people from history.
The first one is a prime example of why you should always be thorough with IQ tests.
“Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Sounds vaguely familiar to the incoming administration and the USA’s inevitable downfall.
In this video, we'll be talking about egomaniacal dictators and generals who destroyed entire generations or entire countries. Now let's start things off with Feeble-Minded Seaman Schmuckatelli, who made a mistake that could've killed somebody, but didn't, but could've, but didn't. Yup, definitely belongs on the list.