Yes. It is hard to produce a large number of videos on this subject, because how much can one really say? But the Accelerating Rate of Change Documentary (which is not complete yet) is also related. Thanks for staying subscribed despite the infrequent visits to this topic.
I would like to hear you explore this topic further. Perhaps you could share your personal thoughts on it-what it all might mean, why it happens, the odds, and how it connects to theories like simulation theory, the multiverse, or any other related hypothesis.
I have a few of objections, at least notes. We see more recent events because of the selection bias. Some estimates put the brain size of T Rex to be about a dog, or even chimp. Birds have much more efficient brains than mammals pound for pound, rather, Gram for Gramm. Neanderthals used to have somehow bigger brains than sapiens, the diagram suggests otherwise. In the last few thousand years the human brains are shrinking. In theory human brains still can grow bigger if our skulls keep growing through childhood, this would require big morphological changes, though. One counter example to my statement is that many women have c sections, which somehow decouples the size of a newborn baby head from the pelvis..
Yes, you have been discussing the fusion of human and artificial intelligence for quite some time, and in more practical terms and not just in a fictional way. Indeed, it is a profound subject. True technological interface systems may incorporate the human senses (bio systems) or bypass them all-together. When I learned to operate nuclear reactors, it was necessary to learn to think differently and precisely about key indicators, the status and operation of mechanical and electrical systems with a high degree of focus and discipline. When we have new interfaces with AI, we will have the opportunity to learn to think differently. For example, learning to operate a reactor safely required a frequent assessment of parameters and rates of change in temperature, pressure, coolant flow, steam demand, neutron flux (reactor power) and dozens of other less important factors. When that is done for you by AI, or with you because you still need to know what’s going on if something fails, the mind will be free to focus on other, more important activities. This can improve speed (response time), safety, shorter learning curves, efficiency, and numerous other aspects. What an amazing time to be involved in this technological revolution.
What's more interesting is that there are subspecies of humans, but one cannot talk about this for obvious reasons these days (it's already proven genetically). Primitive characteristics (size or strength) or always inversely proportional to IQ advances (which is why Kartik points out that smarter humans used tech and thus the tradeoff). Kartik, what do you consider "superintelligence" that is "outside" the human? I presume the "singularity" but philosophically we can already know this isn't really true.
I think he's playing into the hands of transhumanism here, which is both bizarre and questioanble. What goes along with that is depopulation, by the way, and/or eugenics. One can see it if you have real wisdom, not necessarily intelligence in some processing speed capacity (what he is getting at).
This is the content I've subscribed to-great stuff!
Yes. It is hard to produce a large number of videos on this subject, because how much can one really say? But the Accelerating Rate of Change Documentary (which is not complete yet) is also related.
Thanks for staying subscribed despite the infrequent visits to this topic.
I would like to hear you explore this topic further. Perhaps you could share your personal thoughts on it-what it all might mean, why it happens, the odds, and how it connects to theories like simulation theory, the multiverse, or any other related hypothesis.
I have a few of objections, at least notes. We see more recent events because of the selection bias. Some estimates put the brain size of T Rex to be about a dog, or even chimp. Birds have much more efficient brains than mammals pound for pound, rather, Gram for Gramm. Neanderthals used to have somehow bigger brains than sapiens, the diagram suggests otherwise. In the last few thousand years the human brains are shrinking. In theory human brains still can grow bigger if our skulls keep growing through childhood, this would require big morphological changes, though. One counter example to my statement is that many women have c sections, which somehow decouples the size of a newborn baby head from the pelvis..
I wonder when I’ll finally evolve some intelligence. I’ve been waiting for millions of years!
Are you pulling the distribution down?
Yes, you have been discussing the fusion of human and artificial intelligence for quite some time, and in more practical terms and not just in a fictional way. Indeed, it is a profound subject. True technological interface systems may incorporate the human senses (bio systems) or bypass them all-together. When I learned to operate nuclear reactors, it was necessary to learn to think differently and precisely about key indicators, the status and operation of mechanical and electrical systems with a high degree of focus and discipline. When we have new interfaces with AI, we will have the opportunity to learn to think differently. For example, learning to operate a reactor safely required a frequent assessment of parameters and rates of change in temperature, pressure, coolant flow, steam demand, neutron flux (reactor power) and dozens of other less important factors. When that is done for you by AI, or with you because you still need to know what’s going on if something fails, the mind will be free to focus on other, more important activities. This can improve speed (response time), safety, shorter learning curves, efficiency, and numerous other aspects. What an amazing time to be involved in this technological revolution.
What's more interesting is that there are subspecies of humans, but one cannot talk about this for obvious reasons these days (it's already proven genetically). Primitive characteristics (size or strength) or always inversely proportional to IQ advances (which is why Kartik points out that smarter humans used tech and thus the tradeoff).
Kartik, what do you consider "superintelligence" that is "outside" the human? I presume the "singularity" but philosophically we can already know this isn't really true.
The Evolutionary Trendline of Intelligence......then we introduce OF
Human brain size will shrink once we outsource the work of the cortex to the machine.
I think he's playing into the hands of transhumanism here, which is both bizarre and questioanble. What goes along with that is depopulation, by the way, and/or eugenics. One can see it if you have real wisdom, not necessarily intelligence in some processing speed capacity (what he is getting at).