Totally agreed, Ford nailed it with the 2013-2014 styling. To me the 2015 and up look way worse although the 2019 Bullit and 2020 GT500 are growing on me
I bought my 14 new in 2013, in 2016 I put a roush supercharger on it. I drive it every day and now have 100k miles on the clock. I’ll probably drive it another 10 years then restore it and keep it.
The only thing wrong with it is the electronic steering brought to the Mustang in 2011. I use to own a V6 14, it was good enough to outrun the cops...but not the cameras. I have since gone more oldschool with my 96 Camaro Z28....6 speed of course.
I love my 14 GT premium in black. Even thought the new 2018 it’s a more sophisticated car. These late 13-14 still look awesome. I’m planning on keeping this one in the family, since it’s not my daily driver and after 4 years I just hit 10,000 miles.
I’m a GM/LS guy but the 5.0 Coyote is one heck of a great engine. High tech and sounds great. I have 250,000 plus miles on my 5.3 Silverado but my dad’s 2013 F150 5.0 is at 180,000 mostly trouble free miles. Actually the engine has been 100% perfect so it seems long term reliability is pretty good with these. I was so happy in 2011 when they brought the 5 liter back. A mustang just ain’t right without a 5.0 badge on the side. It’s amazing they double the horsepower of the old Foxbodys
Idk, but I personally really like the 3v 4.6 motors too tho. They have pretty good power and punch above their weight. Honestly, any v8 in a mustang is a good thing tho lol
I really love the look of the '10-'14 GTs with 13-14 being my favorite. Despite the newer tech and suspension from 2015 on, there just hasn't been a Mustang that I would ever really want to buy after this generation. I still really notice these on the road while anything newer just blends in with everything else.
Mod for mod the automatic 5.0s beat the manuals 9/10. The automatic 6r80 transmission is bulletproof and the mt82 manual is the mustang's Achilles heel.
I have a 2014 gt with leather recaros and the track pack in the same color. Absolutely love it. Comfortable for the street but still handles well. Only mod is a flowmaster exhaust. This is basically my car except I have a 6 speed manual. With 96,000 on the clock, it has been incredibly reliable. Highly recommended ! My only complaint is fuel economy. I’m lucky to get 13 mpg city 🤷🏼♂️
From the factory through track aps I have hit 60 in 4.4 seconds consistently when it was 80 outside, even in 40 degree weather I'm hitting 60 in the sub 5 second range. I know the car is a 12.7 capable car from the showroom floor
I love mine as well. She’s almost 6 years old and it never get old taking her out for a spin. I’m glad I was able to get it back then new and keep her as a toy!!!
Agreed. Like some other folks are commenting, this may be at some altitude. The 5.0 is actually closer to 4 flat to 60 properly driven with an MT82 and of course, 12s all day. I know the auto is on par with the stick in this car except out of the hole: I've really never seen anything much below 5 out of these stock with an automatic.
As the owner of '14 Track Pack Car those 1/4 mile and 0-60 times don't surprise me too much even if they are well bellow potential. This car is TOUGH to launch until you've had some serious seat time in it. Wheel Spin and wheel hop on the too small 255/40/19 Perrelli tire is a major problem. It took new Control arms and some practice to get the mid 4 second 0-60 times the car can do on street tires with CONSISTENCY. As for the 4.3 second 0-60 advertised by Ford....... perfect launches are required to get it and on the street it's near impossible without better tires. Make no mistake both the engine and car have the power to get you a mid to low 12 second 1/4 mile at the track........but very few people are going to get that out of it on day one at the track.
***** That's both true and yet not really a "fix" for the problem. The S197 was designed for the 2005 model year and Ford did very little to improve the rear suspension over the 10 year run. This Car was originally designed to handle it's 4.6 liter 3 valve motor that made a far weaker 300HP. The problems of Wheel Hop and a too skinny tire were far less obvious than it is in this car with it's 40% power increase over 2005. Luckily the "fix" is easy. New Trailing arms (inexpensive bolt ins) fix the "hop" and fatter stickier rubber does a better job of containing the wheel spin. The advertised 0-60 and 1/4 mile times can only be achieved with real consistency after you get all this sorted out. Before doing it......getting those faster times is a CRAP SHOOT requiring a practiced "launch" and crossed fingers for luck...this is.true for both standard and automatic shift cars.
+Dogboy1960 A replacement UCA will do more than the LCA's will. Doing both is the best option though. You will still be spinning, but at least your rear will live.
I just bought a 13 gt grabber blue with black stripes black wheels. It has a cold air intake and Borla ATAK exhaust already on it. So it’s around 440 hp with the upgrades and it sounds mean as hell
LOL at all of you that think the auto 5.0 is as slow as Motorweek's times suggest! I took my bone stock auto 14' GT and ran a 12.9 @111 with a 2.0 60 ft.
Mine with only one bank got to 60 In 6.4 seconds in a 2.5 inline 4 camry 😂 List of mods 1- open element breather 2- half tank E85 half 87 regular auto tuning to compensate for e15 capability for all cars 2009+ 3- 0-60 5.5 seconds + ¼ high 13s 270 hp with tune by gear
This car is about perfect. Love the looks, love that it’s still very much a pony car. I watched a review of a 2018 GT and it seems to be at a another level. More in the realm of a Vette of the era. I have a 96 Z28 and love it for its simplicity but if I were ever to replace it, it would be with an 11-14 mustang GT.
blackonefifty they should be. But they won't bring doing it without A LOT stickier tire and a tune. Like slick type grip. Because there is noway in hell they are doing it without. When a 660hp gt500 can barely do 11s and 99% of the time it's high 11s on a good day. The thing I find funny is people say "tune" you know how much a tune can give? 10-15 HP on a bad day. People act like that a tune is nothing.
Ryan C I mean, I give most cars a mulligan on tires. Only one manufacturer out there puts their beasts on decent rubber and that’s Dodge and even then the Hellcat and Demon are iffy. As for going on whatever this show produces for numbers, LOL. 13.5 out of any Coyote S197 is a laugher.
blackonefifty the tires on the hellcat aren't that great. The demon needs to be because of the HP and setup. In my opinion the best tires are the on Vette. They were the best you could get and for years there were gm exclusive. What kills a lot of these cars are the width. The hellcat has 275s. For a car with 707hp that's nothing. Christ the gm f-bodys had 275s in the 90s to 2002.
Adam Minges haha I know right I bought a 2012. For 19k with only 11k on the odometer. For 8 less horsepower and a few cosemtic details I'm not bitchin. it's literally the same fucking car lol
Jake Smith yes actually it will, idiot. The DA can easily slow a car down 1/2 a second to a second. For example, the Demon ran a 9.65 when the DA was negative 1500 ft. At high DA’s, Demon’s run low 10’s.
These guys have a pretty accurate test. MT consistently gets higher times cuz they do their runs over and over and posts their lowest fastest times. And they beat the vehicle. Launch hard again and again. Turn off all the traction controls and beat on it to get the fastest times. The regular joe shmoe driving will get closer to these times but the stang is capable under the right conditions of running 4.8- 13.0 flat. 12.7 in the auto in sport mode. Even 12.5 if you catch it right.
I like to think that the 2013 and 14 mustangs will be looked at in the same way as the R34 Nissan Skyline GTR How you ask?????????? The 13 to 14 mustang is basically the last true red white and blue American muscle car from Ford before they made the mustang a global product In 2015 It’s a similar story with the R34 only Japanese The 2015 mustang looks more European in its design and more like a sports car then a red blooded muscle car I feel there are folks out there in other parts of the world that secretly want a 13 to 14 mustang Just like how us Americans are begging for the R34 Though I could be wrong idk
I'm sure they tested the times with regular instead of premium. He says the fuel they were running at the end. Makes a huge horsepower difference in the 5.0. Love this car tho. Of course I'm biased!
The Camaro hasn't really changed since its reintroduction, The Stang just keeps getting better. Can't wait to test drive the 15. Keep up the great work Ford.
My dad has this exact same car, in the exact same color. Best damn mustang you could buy. Only problem is the heat had welded an exhaust bolt, so we couldn't get it off. A lot of cars have that problem, so great car still!
LMAO i ran 12.90 @110 bone stock in my 14 5.0 with 3.15's and automatic. Shiit I even ran 13.7 stock in my 3.7 Mustang. Get somebody that can drive if your going to do popular reviews about a cars performance...
3SevenStangVids You have to keep environmental factors in mind. Who knows what temperature, humidity, and effective altitude they tested at. That 420hp rating is on a dyno with various correction factors. Where I live the drag strip at ~2500ft and in the spring and fall we sometimes get near sea-level air and I've seen these cars, stock on street tires, run low 13's. Occasionally one will break into the high 12's. They do have 12's in them stock, but pretty much only under quite favorable conditions.
Can't get a track apps car unless its a premium, same for the 4.2 LCD in the instrument panel. And automatic trans comes with 3.15 gears in the track package, not 3.73's. Only 3.55's or 3.73's are aviail on sticks only.
When they changed the BODY style IT hurt MUSTANG at first. BECAUSE it's 69 STYLING. BUT trying hard to bring IT back. Good luck MUSTANG YOUR GOING TO NEED IT.
motorweek did 13.8 and 5.5 with the mustang gt 2005, they're something wrong with these number according to me... 13.5 ? i've seen 12.7 stock, you even look motortrend and they did 12.9 with a convertible...
You have to take into consideration air temp track temperature and altitude from sea level. Stock car with just a change of tires also makes a huge difference. But you also right it could be the driver as well.
My bothers 3,850 LB 2001 Lincoln Continental with a 4.6L 32v V8 that's rated @ 17/25 back then, which under the post 2008 ratings would be 15/23 gets really good mpg's. He actually averages 26-27 mpg @ 60-65 mph & averages 20 mpg overall. That 17/26 rating of the 5.0 would have been 19/28 prior to 2008. That's absolutely amazing for a V8, hell that's even good for a V6. How can this 200 pound lighter car with 2 extra gears & all this technology get 2-3 mpg less than my brother car @ 60 mph?
What’s crazy about this car is that it made 420hp and 390 ftlbs with a naturally aspirated 5.0 for $31,000 starting price, when 10 years earlier in 2003 the cobra had 390 hp and 390 ftlbs, with a supercharged 4.6 engine and a base price of $33,000. The terminator is still cooler in my opinion though lol
@ShermanMR2 That's exactly I thought about. If they give the Mustang with a fast automatic, can't they at least have paddle shifters instead of that poor-excuse-for-shifting-manually button on the shifter?
Nice Try just bought a 2013 with 3.73 and all season tires which are junk. Cold temps bad traction I going 0-60 in 4.8 the only way I do worse is if you let it spin. Cant wait for spring warm temps and summer tires.
troy Stebens Yeah man definitely get some tires on it! All weather tires will REALLY make this car suffer. With more super sticky tires and a nice burnout, this car will definitely hit the mid 4's!
Their times seem very slow. My 93 with a 340hp ford crate motor and 3:73s ran a 13.4 I cant keep up with a 2011 stock mustang. If you noticed when they first ran the 1/4 mile with the 2013 they spun the tires excessively.
Depends on the auto...but the ones today are indeed batter than the ones from yesteryear. The point is that even they admit that the car is slower than the previous car they tested and even what they expected. Could be the track or atmospheric conditions...or a soft car. The driver doesn't 'suck'...
lol i own a 2013 gt500..only has 450miles on it. I havnt taken it to the track yet and pushed it that hard yet. I also own a Boss 302 with 5000 miles on it. My best times for that are 0-60 4.2 and 1/4 mile in about 12.4. All stock and the numbers are according to track apps.
I am running very consistently 4.8 sec, 0-60 and 12.9 sec, 1/4 mile with street tires at 5800 ft. elevation. These guys are smoking Crack with the times. But then again MT has always been very pro GM.
2:43 Launches from a burnout and spins tires for 60ft... Runs 13.5... i wonder why? lol and it looked like traction control was on and it cut power to stop the spinning.
Also, the era is not even close to over man. The Mustang, Camaro & Challenger are selling like mad. Especially the Mustang & the Camaro. I see these cars all over the place. Ever since 2005 when the S197 came out, the muscle car has been a hot ticket again. Now that the Camaro SS, Challenger R/T & SRT-8 are out there has been a huge battle between them which is great! Most people who buy $30k-$40K+ cars don't have to worry about mpg's, which are improving every year anyway.
12.7-13.0 is the norm in the 1/4 for the 13 mustang. I believe they left traction control on and used the slow performing tap shift. If it was a manual I wouldnt need to comment.
At 60mph in my 2013 GT Manual with 3.55 gear I get about 28 mpg. 24-25mpg at 75-80 mph with fairly flat road. 22mpg mixed driving. Never done all city driving. But im sure its better than 13.9. Because mine didnt even go that low after a few hours at the drag strip. You just dont know how to squeeze out the mpg's if thats all your getting.
Stangs are cool and they are fun to drive but that era is over. Just like in the 70s brought on the death, high gas prices are forcing people to get rid of their gas guzzling muscle car. In the manual expect 13.9 mpg city and 23.9 mpg hwy at 60 mph. The auto gets 1-2 mpg better. It's a great car always has been and ford has not rested on their laurels. The 2015 mustang should kick ass. Power is not an issue, they have that nailed down. V6 is pretty damn good also. There is no reason for high gas
most of the time not, depends....lots of power and consistent shifts with auto can achieve quicker times..for example the new Camaro ZL1, cadillac etc. Check out drag racing near you. Best to install high performance ''shift kit'' or better yet custom build auto tranny.
Both Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro has that hump on the hood leaving Dodge Challenger the best of the retro design among the three, just because of that hump. Now, if the design is retro, not everyone prefers the look of a bumped up exaggerated looks of the old design. Some like the plain simple and elegant looks of an old car even is it is a pony car. Just look at the 1964 Mustang, the original, it is still the best design with the elegant lines and no exaggerated hump on the hood.
Wow I guess that track sucks, it's hard to blame the driver with an auto, I was at the track with 1 last week and he went 12.9 stock auto car. And I'm at 14.3 with a 6 speed 3.7 base model all stock short shifting. I think I can even see 14.1 with a better 60' and 7k shifts.
I just bought a 2014 GT with the track pack. Only has 10,250 miles on the clock. And I'm biased, but the 2014 was the last decent looking Mustang built.
His voice is an icon for any real car enthusiast
Anthony Blake ..YES HE IS!! ICON..LEGENDARY..MY 1ST STOP FOR ANY CAR REVIEW.
Anthony Blake mario?
The 2013 and 2014 nailed it; beautiful styling with a TON of muscle.
Sweetest Mustang ever...
Totally agreed, Ford nailed it with the 2013-2014 styling. To me the 2015 and up look way worse although the 2019 Bullit and 2020 GT500 are growing on me
This guy knows
I bought my 14 new in 2013, in 2016 I put a roush supercharger on it. I drive it every day and now have 100k miles on the clock. I’ll probably drive it another 10 years then restore it and keep it.
The only thing wrong with it is the electronic steering brought to the Mustang in 2011. I use to own a V6 14, it was good enough to outrun the cops...but not the cameras. I have since gone more oldschool with my 96 Camaro Z28....6 speed of course.
I love my 14 GT premium in black. Even thought the new 2018 it’s a more sophisticated car. These late 13-14 still look awesome. I’m planning on keeping this one in the family, since it’s not my daily driver and after 4 years I just hit 10,000 miles.
I’m a GM/LS guy but the 5.0 Coyote is one heck of a great engine. High tech and sounds great. I have 250,000 plus miles on my 5.3 Silverado but my dad’s 2013 F150 5.0 is at 180,000 mostly trouble free miles. Actually the engine has been 100% perfect so it seems long term reliability is pretty good with these. I was so happy in 2011 when they brought the 5 liter back. A mustang just ain’t right without a 5.0 badge on the side. It’s amazing they double the horsepower of the old Foxbodys
It's absolutely NOTHING like the old 5.0 so the only thing they brought "back" was the size in liters and a revised badge.
The fox body 5.0 was actually a 4.9 lol
@@dr.lyleevans6915 so funny 😐
Idk, but I personally really like the 3v 4.6 motors too tho. They have pretty good power and punch above their weight. Honestly, any v8 in a mustang is a good thing tho lol
I really love the look of the '10-'14 GTs with 13-14 being my favorite. Despite the newer tech and suspension from 2015 on, there just hasn't been a Mustang that I would ever really want to buy after this generation. I still really notice these on the road while anything newer just blends in with everything else.
Mod for mod the automatic 5.0s beat the manuals 9/10. The automatic 6r80 transmission is bulletproof and the mt82 manual is the mustang's Achilles heel.
My 13 auto stock was quick . With converter 410 gears , tune full exhaust, throttle body etc bolt on made it a killer driver mod needed
I have a 2014 gt with leather recaros and the track pack in the same color. Absolutely love it. Comfortable for the street but still handles well. Only mod is a flowmaster exhaust. This is basically my car except I have a 6 speed manual. With 96,000 on the clock, it has been incredibly reliable. Highly recommended !
My only complaint is fuel economy. I’m lucky to get 13 mpg city 🤷🏼♂️
From the factory through track aps I have hit 60 in 4.4 seconds consistently when it was 80 outside, even in 40 degree weather I'm hitting 60 in the sub 5 second range. I know the car is a 12.7 capable car from the showroom floor
I love owning this car!
Me too! 2014 GT/CS, all the goodies!
I love mine as well. She’s almost 6 years old and it never get old taking her out for a spin. I’m glad I was able to get it back then new and keep her as a toy!!!
HOLLLLY crap bad times.
Well it was an automatic
@@goldenretriever6440then it should be even better
@@sapperstangno ti shouldn't he said right in the video the manual was faster smh not to mention back than the manual was quicker
Agreed. Like some other folks are commenting, this may be at some altitude. The 5.0 is actually closer to 4 flat to 60 properly driven with an MT82 and of course, 12s all day. I know the auto is on par with the stick in this car except out of the hole: I've really never seen anything much below 5 out of these stock with an automatic.
i have a 2014 gt, i can just watch these videos about the cars over and over :)
As the owner of '14 Track Pack Car those 1/4 mile and 0-60 times don't surprise me too much even if they are well bellow potential. This car is TOUGH to launch until you've had some serious seat time in it. Wheel Spin and wheel hop on the too small 255/40/19 Perrelli tire is a major problem. It took new Control arms and some practice to get the mid 4 second 0-60 times the car can do on street tires with CONSISTENCY. As for the 4.3 second 0-60 advertised by Ford....... perfect launches are required to get it and on the street it's near impossible without better tires. Make no mistake both the engine and car have the power to get you a mid to low 12 second 1/4 mile at the track........but very few people are going to get that out of it on day one at the track.
That makes a lot of sense. Well put.
***** That's both true and yet not really a "fix" for the problem. The S197 was designed for the 2005 model year and Ford did very little to improve the rear suspension over the 10 year run. This Car was originally designed to handle it's 4.6 liter 3 valve motor that made a far weaker 300HP. The problems of Wheel Hop and a too skinny tire were far less obvious than it is in this car with it's 40% power increase over 2005. Luckily the "fix" is easy. New Trailing arms (inexpensive bolt ins) fix the "hop" and fatter stickier rubber does a better job of containing the wheel spin. The advertised 0-60 and 1/4 mile times can only be achieved with real consistency after you get all this sorted out. Before doing it......getting those faster times is a CRAP SHOOT requiring a practiced "launch" and crossed fingers for luck...this is.true for both standard and automatic shift cars.
Dogboy1960 I got a 4.7 second time with 3 people in the car, and all season tires, and a 3.31 gear ratio, i don't know what you're saying.
+semiautoriflelover1 A good tune and the proper converter and it is a high 11 second car with an auto.
+Dogboy1960 A replacement UCA will do more than the LCA's will. Doing both is the best option though. You will still be spinning, but at least your rear will live.
I just bought a 13 gt grabber blue with black stripes black wheels. It has a cold air intake and Borla ATAK exhaust already on it. So it’s around 440 hp with the upgrades and it sounds mean as hell
LOL at all of you that think the auto 5.0 is as slow as Motorweek's times suggest!
I took my bone stock auto 14' GT and ran a 12.9 @111 with a 2.0 60 ft.
Ben Jake they're still no fun lol
And now you have a scat pack so it speaks for its self
My auto 2015 GT (stock) did a 12.6 @113mph with a 1.9 60 ft on 265 summer tires
Why did you buy the auto is the bigger question smh
Mine with only one bank got to 60 In 6.4 seconds in a 2.5 inline 4 camry 😂
List of mods
1- open element breather
2- half tank E85 half 87 regular auto tuning to compensate for e15 capability for all cars 2009+
3- 0-60 5.5 seconds + ¼ high 13s
270 hp with tune by gear
This car is about perfect. Love the looks, love that it’s still very much a pony car. I watched a review of a 2018 GT and it seems to be at a another level. More in the realm of a Vette of the era. I have a 96 Z28 and love it for its simplicity but if I were ever to replace it, it would be with an 11-14 mustang GT.
My 2014 GT all stock on street tires 6 speed I ran 13.0 @ 110 lost traction. Yeah they can do 12s.
zz5s10blazer lol ok. Next thing they will do 11s.
Ryan C as a matter of fact the new 2018’s are running 11’s nothing more than a stickier tire and a conservative tune 🤷♂️
blackonefifty they should be. But they won't bring doing it without A LOT stickier tire and a tune. Like slick type grip. Because there is noway in hell they are doing it without. When a 660hp gt500 can barely do 11s and 99% of the time it's high 11s on a good day.
The thing I find funny is people say "tune" you know how much a tune can give? 10-15 HP on a bad day. People act like that a tune is nothing.
Ryan C I mean, I give most cars a mulligan on tires. Only one manufacturer out there puts their beasts on decent rubber and that’s Dodge and even then the Hellcat and Demon are iffy. As for going on whatever this show produces for numbers, LOL. 13.5 out of any Coyote S197 is a laugher.
blackonefifty the tires on the hellcat aren't that great. The demon needs to be because of the HP and setup. In my opinion the best tires are the on Vette. They were the best you could get and for years there were gm exclusive. What kills a lot of these cars are the width. The hellcat has 275s. For a car with 707hp that's nothing. Christ the gm f-bodys had 275s in the 90s to 2002.
He literarily shits on 2012 owners lol 0:52
Lol dosent matter its still the same balance just a couple of horsepower but id rather get a 2011 used one much cheaper than 2014
Adam Minges haha I know right I bought a 2012. For 19k with only 11k on the odometer. For 8 less horsepower and a few cosemtic details I'm not bitchin. it's literally the same fucking car lol
While the 13-14 looks nice, I honestly think the 10-12 look is much better looking, though Ford did screw up 2010 owners with the 4.6 lol
3 years later and I bet people are still laughing at "literarily".
aidoist Yea 2010 owners were probably mad when the 2011 came out with 97 extra horsepower and an extra gear.
Im a regular Joe and I got 4.6 to 60mph according to the track apps.
WOW you guys need a better driver. 13.5 1/4? 5.1 0 to 60??? thats terrible
agreed!!!
they are like 1000ft above sea lvl. If you know what that means u don't need me too tell you!
Dristo Martin
What is sad is that MIR and Capitol are really close to them.
Dristo 800 1000 feet wont make that much of a difference idiot.
Jake Smith yes actually it will, idiot. The DA can easily slow a car down 1/2 a second to a second. For example, the Demon ran a 9.65 when the DA was negative 1500 ft. At high DA’s, Demon’s run low 10’s.
Best mustang ever 13-14
Even the V6 with 305HP with a 6speed is more of a mustang than most
These guys have a pretty accurate test. MT consistently gets higher times cuz they do their runs over and over and posts their lowest fastest times. And they beat the vehicle. Launch hard again and again. Turn off all the traction controls and beat on it to get the fastest times. The regular joe shmoe driving will get closer to these times but the stang is capable under the right conditions of running 4.8- 13.0 flat. 12.7 in the auto in sport mode. Even 12.5 if you catch it right.
I like to think that the 2013 and 14 mustangs will be looked at in the same way as the R34 Nissan Skyline GTR
How you ask??????????
The 13 to 14 mustang is basically the last true red white and blue American muscle car from Ford before they made the mustang a global product In 2015
It’s a similar story with the R34 only Japanese
The 2015 mustang looks more European in its design and more like a sports car then a red blooded muscle car
I feel there are folks out there in other parts of the world that secretly want a 13 to 14 mustang
Just like how us Americans are begging for the R34
Though I could be wrong idk
I've watched that car stock with the auto run 12.80 at our track arizona...weird!
I'm sure they tested the times with regular instead of premium. He says the fuel they were running at the end. Makes a huge horsepower difference in the 5.0. Love this car tho. Of course I'm biased!
@@matth7627 Yeah, your probably right
The Camaro hasn't really changed since its reintroduction, The Stang just keeps getting better. Can't wait to test drive the 15. Keep up the great work Ford.
I can't wait to test drive the new 2016 camaro ss , you should look up what they got in the new quarter mile times with the camaro online
My dad has this exact same car, in the exact same color. Best damn mustang you could buy. Only problem is the heat had welded an exhaust bolt, so we couldn't get it off. A lot of cars have that problem, so great car still!
That's part Motorweek's charm!
LMAO i ran 12.90 @110 bone stock in my 14 5.0 with 3.15's and automatic. Shiit I even ran 13.7 stock in my 3.7 Mustang. Get somebody that can drive if your going to do popular reviews about a cars performance...
I found you again!! Lol
3SevenStangVids
You have to keep environmental factors in mind. Who knows what temperature, humidity, and effective altitude they tested at. That 420hp rating is on a dyno with various correction factors. Where I live the drag strip at ~2500ft and in the spring and fall we sometimes get near sea-level air and I've seen these cars, stock on street tires, run low 13's. Occasionally one will break into the high 12's. They do have 12's in them stock, but pretty much only under quite favorable conditions.
Anyone else notice he ran regular gas? Pretty obvious what caused the slow QM time.
I owned a 2012 rs camaro and now have a 13 mustang. The mustang is far more nimble and fun to drive.
Can't get a track apps car unless its a premium, same for the 4.2 LCD in the instrument panel. And automatic trans comes with 3.15 gears in the track package, not 3.73's. Only 3.55's or 3.73's are aviail on sticks only.
@challengerguy22. Only mods I have are suspension and brakes. Neither of those really affect a freeway race with no turns
The 10-12 body will always be my favorite but this looks nice
Great car with the Coyote engine ! I still prefer my 2006 Legend Lime GT. Sometimes style is more important than speed.
My dream car
2:12 white zombie - more human than human THEE perfect song to enjoy while riding in your ‘13 GT
2013 or 2014 much better than the current Mustang GT 5.0 2015 and 2016
well they are lighter........
ill trade the 200 poubds heavier for thr independant rear suspension any day! ride like a sport car now not like a truck and works great at thr traxk.
When they changed the BODY style IT hurt MUSTANG at first. BECAUSE it's 69 STYLING. BUT trying hard to bring IT back. Good luck MUSTANG YOUR GOING TO NEED IT.
mustang is as good as it gets guys stop trippin, sells show it and performance show it. now if it could stop getting so damn expensive.
I like the 2013 gt s beter than 19 gt. S sorry for my coment
I Bought a 2014 6 speed manual mustang gt its 2022 i daily her to work its a great car
I love this car.
I didn't know the 13 had 420 hp. That's lit. The 93 had nearly 200 hp less from the same size engine.
I couldn't find a video for the 2005 Bullitt Mustang. The color is even called, Steve Mcqeen green.
The S197 Bullitt was offered in 2008 and early 2009 and they are highland Green and a few are Black. Get the black one if you want collectability.
motorweek did 13.8 and 5.5 with the mustang gt 2005, they're something wrong with these number according to me... 13.5 ? i've seen 12.7 stock, you even look motortrend and they did 12.9 with a convertible...
at Fayetteville motorsports park 2-9-13 I ran 12.6990 at 112.95 mph. in my bone stock 13 GT
Like the 69 GT , the S197 is the most beautiful of the new breed!! In my humble opinion ‼️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
I love the 13 stang
its all about the driver. people have ran 12.7 and done 0-60 in 4.3 sec.
Pedro Estrada that's exactly what I did!!! MotorWeek need new drivers
These guys are supposedly Pros at this. There shouldn't have been any "driver" errors?
You have to take into consideration air temp track temperature and altitude from sea level. Stock car with just a change of tires also makes a huge difference. But you also right it could be the driver as well.
I love my 2012 mustang gt
My bothers 3,850 LB 2001 Lincoln Continental with a 4.6L 32v V8 that's rated @ 17/25 back then, which under the post 2008 ratings would be 15/23 gets really good mpg's. He actually averages 26-27 mpg @ 60-65 mph & averages 20 mpg overall. That 17/26 rating of the 5.0 would have been 19/28 prior to 2008. That's absolutely amazing for a V8, hell that's even good for a V6. How can this 200 pound lighter car with 2 extra gears & all this technology get 2-3 mpg less than my brother car @ 60 mph?
My dream car is an 05 to 09 Mustang GT
But if i can't find any in good condition the 2013 would be the car I'd go with
Proof is right there ! enough said !
John Davis just answered that question for me at 3:10.
What’s crazy about this car is that it made 420hp and 390 ftlbs with a naturally aspirated 5.0 for $31,000 starting price, when 10 years earlier in 2003 the cobra had 390 hp and 390 ftlbs, with a supercharged 4.6 engine and a base price of $33,000. The terminator is still cooler in my opinion though lol
The terminator was also underrated big time. It was not putting 390hp flywheel as they claimed, lol.
3:38 that nose dive though XD
Sweet !
That’s awesome, my 71 formula 400 firebird auto runs the same time as the GT but 104mph not 108 or whatever the GT did
@ShermanMR2 That's exactly I thought about. If they give the Mustang with a fast automatic, can't they at least have paddle shifters instead of that poor-excuse-for-shifting-manually button on the shifter?
That is funny this cars make stock 0-60 in 4.4 or less lol
Maybe in perfect conditions with premium sticky tires yes. But on the street, this car is in the low to high 5 range all day.
Nice Try just bought a 2013 with 3.73 and all season tires which are junk. Cold temps bad traction I going 0-60 in 4.8 the only way I do worse is if you let it spin. Cant wait for spring warm temps and summer tires.
troy Stebens Yeah man definitely get some tires on it! All weather tires will REALLY make this car suffer. With more super sticky tires and a nice burnout, this car will definitely hit the mid 4's!
alberto acosta its because they are testing the auto. Boooo, manual or nothing.
Nice Try your high its a low 4 second car lol my 265hp foxbody is a solid 5.9 0 to 60 this would blow me away
Damn does this guy ever get too old to do this show. Good to see he's alive and happy lol.
Wow 13.5 at the strip, originally most testers did it in 12 sec range.
Easily make 500rwhp with full bolt ons. I can't wait to get one. Having the underpowered version of the Coyote in my F150, its a great engine.
Which bolt ons? Headers, exhaust and intake? Or also with a high flow cat and cams?
Nice car 👊😍😍😍
My favorite generation.
Did you see all that break dive? Wow you need after market shocks springs and roll bars
Whoa!! Those times are way off..2013-2014 Mustang GT's can hit the 1/4 anywhere from 12.6 - 12.9.
Why are they showing a SHelbyGT500 in the beginning ?
Daaamn ! I want this car *_*
Their times seem very slow. My 93 with a 340hp ford crate motor and 3:73s ran a 13.4 I cant keep up with a 2011 stock mustang. If you noticed when they first ran the 1/4 mile with the 2013 they spun the tires excessively.
motorwek have the worst times on vehicles dont know why though
still doubt it, there are many cars which when reviewed show good times but at a real track show up very different..
Depends on the auto...but the ones today are indeed batter than the ones from yesteryear. The point is that even they admit that the car is slower than the previous car they tested and even what they expected. Could be the track or atmospheric conditions...or a soft car. The driver doesn't 'suck'...
lol i own a 2013 gt500..only has 450miles on it. I havnt taken it to the track yet and pushed it that hard yet. I also own a Boss 302 with 5000 miles on it. My best times for that are 0-60 4.2 and 1/4 mile in about 12.4. All stock and the numbers are according to track apps.
I am running very consistently 4.8 sec, 0-60 and 12.9 sec, 1/4 mile with street tires at 5800 ft. elevation. These guys are smoking Crack with the times. But then again MT has always been very pro GM.
2:43 Launches from a burnout and spins tires for 60ft... Runs 13.5... i wonder why? lol and it looked like traction control was on and it cut power to stop the spinning.
Have to give Ford props, they put a lot of effort into keeping the Mustang an appealing car. Still, I look forward to the more refined next gen.
Also, the era is not even close to over man. The Mustang, Camaro & Challenger are selling like mad. Especially the Mustang & the Camaro. I see these cars all over the place. Ever since 2005 when the S197 came out, the muscle car has been a hot ticket again. Now that the Camaro SS, Challenger R/T & SRT-8 are out there has been a huge battle between them which is great! Most people who buy $30k-$40K+ cars don't have to worry about mpg's, which are improving every year anyway.
End of a Era now
12.7-13.0 is the norm in the 1/4 for the 13 mustang. I believe they left traction control on and used the slow performing tap shift. If it was a manual I wouldnt need to comment.
At 60mph in my 2013 GT Manual with 3.55 gear I get about 28 mpg. 24-25mpg at 75-80 mph with fairly flat road. 22mpg mixed driving. Never done all city driving. But im sure its better than 13.9. Because mine didnt even go that low after a few hours at the drag strip. You just dont know how to squeeze out the mpg's if thats all your getting.
I’d be interested in letting you guys film my 2013 Roush stage 2 s197 bone stock. 30kmiles
Did you get it was the slower auto trans?
i like my 2012!
Wonder who that guy could have been? Both are fantastic cars!
Have they replaced the Chinese made Getrag trans yet?
Mustang⚡⚡⚡
The auto does around 4.5-4.7 0-60 and 12.9-13.0 1/4 mile.
it was an auto trans to start with im guessing you have a manual and they were probably around 2,000
exactly
Just bought mine today. It comes on the 18th. 7 days when writing this. lol
Beautiful, beautiful car. Looks mean, sounds mean, and has enough juice to chase down much expensive sport cars out there.
Stangs are cool and they are fun to drive but that era is over. Just like in the 70s brought on the death, high gas prices are forcing people to get rid of their gas guzzling muscle car. In the manual expect 13.9 mpg city and 23.9 mpg hwy at 60 mph. The auto gets 1-2 mpg better. It's a great car always has been and ford has not rested on their laurels. The 2015 mustang should kick ass. Power is not an issue, they have that nailed down. V6 is pretty damn good also. There is no reason for high gas
Yeah at Fayetteville in January I ran a 12.72 at 111.88 in my auto 13 GT.
most of the time not, depends....lots of power and consistent shifts with auto can achieve quicker times..for example the new Camaro ZL1, cadillac etc. Check out drag racing near you. Best to install high performance ''shift kit'' or better yet custom build auto tranny.
all true.
ya there numbers are off
4:28 why would they test a high performance car on "regular" fuel, given it's optimum performance amps up with Premium?!?
I totally agree! 5.0's high compression run best horsepower on premium!
Both Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro has that hump on the hood leaving Dodge Challenger the best of the retro design among the three, just because of that hump. Now, if the design is retro, not everyone prefers the look of a bumped up exaggerated looks of the old design. Some like the plain simple and elegant looks of an old car even is it is a pony car. Just look at the 1964 Mustang, the original, it is still the best design with the elegant lines and no exaggerated hump on the hood.
This guy has a cool ass voice!
Wow I guess that track sucks, it's hard to blame the driver with an auto, I was at the track with 1 last week and he went 12.9 stock auto car. And I'm at 14.3 with a 6 speed 3.7 base model all stock short shifting. I think I can even see 14.1 with a better 60' and 7k shifts.
Did Motorweek test the new 660HP Shelby GT500?
Wow... I got a 5.1 the first time I ever recorded my 0-60... Now im in the mid to low 4s...
I just bought a 2014 GT with the track pack. Only has 10,250 miles on the clock. And I'm biased, but the 2014 was the last decent looking Mustang built.