Life Inside An Inflatable Space Station!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มี.ค. 2024
  • Claim your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here:
    sponsr.is/magellantv_spacerace and start your free trial TODAY so you can watch "Are There Other Earths" about finding other habitable planets in the universe: www.magellantv.com/video/are-...
    Life Inside An Inflatable Space Station!
    Last Video: NASA’s Giant Inflatable Balls!
    • NASA’s Giant Inflatabl...
    ►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
    ►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
    ► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
    ► Patreon: / theteslaspace
    ► Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: / theteslaspace
    Mars Colonization News and Updates
    • Mars Colonization News...
    SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
    The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
    ► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
    Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
    #Spacex #Space #Mars
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 207

  • @TheSpaceRaceYT
    @TheSpaceRaceYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Claim your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here:
    sponsr.is/magellantv_spacerace and start your free trial TODAY so you can watch Are There Other Earths about finding other habitable planets in the universe: www.magellantv.com/video/are-there-other-earths

  • @Pisti846
    @Pisti846 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    This sounds like the type of structure that could make a trip to Mars less claustrophobic and less psychologicaly harsh.

    • @withlessAsbestos
      @withlessAsbestos หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Especially if they could get a few of them on a rotor, they’re light enough that the inertia would be much less than a starship, and they don’t have to worry about air resistance.

    • @Enchantedgamedev
      @Enchantedgamedev หลายเดือนก่อน

      The novelty would where off fast and your turn Omni man faster than you’d expect

    • @michaelpettersson4919
      @michaelpettersson4919 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Especially if a lengthy stay on a space station are mandatory. Those that goes nuts can just be dropped into a pod and sent back to Earth.

    • @RaymanW
      @RaymanW 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@withlessAsbestos that would make the trip really great and much more bearable with artificial gravity!

  • @Crazy_Worlds
    @Crazy_Worlds หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    All space stations are in effect inflatable. A few millimetres of aluminium skin pressurised in the vacuum of space is to all intents and purposes a metal balloon. Using layers of fabric such as Vectron, which is much stronger than aluminium, is actually logical and a better solution in many ways, not least that you can pack a large module into a relatively small delivery vehicle. As to it bursting like a balloon if punctured, that is a fallacy, it just wouldn’t happen with a woven structure.

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      no they have a rigid structure. you have to understand, the role of the containment, is not only have air, but also to transfer the momentum to the rest of the vehicle. this is why the inflated hab are always design to be at the end of the station and not as a connecting body where it cannot impact the stationkeeping. space station do not just freely float in space, they have to orientate to face the sun or away from it to protect critical component or point the radiator away from the sun, as well as maintain their altitude. try pulling a net around a bunch of balloon and try to balance it, you will have to stuggle, it not that u can't do it, but that mean burning more fuel. the more rigid, the less fuel u have to waste fighting the balancing of the station.

    • @willaxesawian9242
      @willaxesawian9242 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      his off the cuff remark at the end that they're more dangerous really didn't seem to be based on anything - I think the creator for a science channel should know better than to make unsubstantiated remarks like that

    • @davidconner-shover51
      @davidconner-shover51 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@lagrangewei rigid supports within the core section between docking modules. Once pressurized to 250-500mb the rest will become quite rigid in it's own right. we're talking about being in a tire, not a blow up balloon.
      As to micrometeorite damage, a, some bounce might actually help prevent much of it from occurring in the first place, an engineered viscous liquid seal could be set permanently in the fabric layers. multiple layers with a gas gap layer between would go a long way to deal with thermal issues.
      Radiation? well we could go the route of "Avenue 5" and fill in just below the outer skin with water and, er, waste.
      If something is big enough to blow out an inflatable, it will likely do more damage to a rigid hull, with less means to fix it.

    • @LaSombraa
      @LaSombraa หลายเดือนก่อน

      No.

    • @patrashdigger
      @patrashdigger หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely a punch in the gut remark, doesn't make sense to throw that in there at the end ​@@willaxesawian9242

  • @Lilmiket1000
    @Lilmiket1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Damn I was praying that Bigelow really work out! I have been rooting for him from the very beginning!

  • @DocWolph
    @DocWolph หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    If nothing else, Inflatable stations would be a way to QUICKLY get infrastructure up there.

    • @michaelpettersson4919
      @michaelpettersson4919 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes and if that isn't deemed sturdy enough for permanent use it could be a start.

  • @TheTeslaSpace
    @TheTeslaSpace หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    My favourite channel on TH-cam.. No.. I am not biased 😅

  • @patrickkelly737
    @patrickkelly737 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Wait wait what? We have actually put inflatable modules in space and they are still there?? That is so cool
    Ad Astra

  • @Lumynex8335
    @Lumynex8335 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Could you please add meters as a measurement in the future? Really like the videos but can’t understand the measurements

    • @ChristianGonzalez-gv6yg
      @ChristianGonzalez-gv6yg หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      like the difference between feets and meters?

    • @jimmyjango5213
      @jimmyjango5213 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      This. Can just be text on the screen

    • @davidconner-shover51
      @davidconner-shover51 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ChristianGonzalez-gv6yg just a rough number for ya, 3m is roughly 10 feets, so, 78 feet is about 23 meters

    • @MozeyNJ
      @MozeyNJ หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@davidconner-shover51True

    • @dokols
      @dokols หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can understand them but why use nonsense murica units when anyone sane and the space industry prefers metric?

  • @MD.ImNoScientician
    @MD.ImNoScientician หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Once again you're doing a deeper dive on a topic we have only seen superficial coverage of elsewhere.
    Thank You !
    I've always thought this is a brilliant idea. I never knew about Genesis I and II.

    • @steveadams7550
      @steveadams7550 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a deeper dive. It is pretty superficial. A overview at best.

  • @vernepavreal7296
    @vernepavreal7296 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    at the time of Bigelow's demise I remember Bigelow not being selected for a contract by Nessa which seemed unfair since the module is good enough to be used and to still be there I suspect the notorious corruption of big aerospace may have been involved Bigelow himself and his company and employees certainly have my sympathies
    Cheers

  • @IIlIIllII
    @IIlIIllII หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If deployment was a 2 stage process, where it was inflated and then materials like a resin can coat the inside and cure(or between 2 layers/walls, like airtight insulation behind drywall). Smaller payload benfit, but stronger/more rigid final station.

  • @magellantv
    @magellantv หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This was absolutely fascinating! Thank you for such an incredible video.

  • @paulperano9236
    @paulperano9236 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Are inflatables really any more dangerous that a metal shelled habitation ? It's not as it the metal skin is 15mm armoured plate steel. Sure inflatables will go 'BANG' and completely rupture, but that takes a lot of internal pressure. I'm sure they can include bleeder valves to avoid over-pressurisation - not rocket science. Yes they can be punctured by micro-meteors, so can metal shells.

  • @viperswhip
    @viperswhip หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Biegelow was so close to getting where they wanted and failed, it's like tripping in the last 10 meters of a race.

    • @lostinthedesert-hp4bw
      @lostinthedesert-hp4bw 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I agree. It’s a shame to see a company’s product come so far as to meet (or exceed) the harshness of space, only to see the company fold and vanish. What a waste 🥺.

  • @danielle78730
    @danielle78730 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i still find it soooo incredibly inscrutible that your channel doesn't already have 1M+ subscribers…!! great work, as always!

  • @PaulADAigle
    @PaulADAigle หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Seems so odd to have such a great idea not used much at all.

    • @TheSpaceRaceYT
      @TheSpaceRaceYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I expect we'll start to see these more commonly used in the coming years

    • @PaulADAigle
      @PaulADAigle หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheSpaceRaceYT I sure hope so!

    • @genericasianperson6405
      @genericasianperson6405 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Unfortunately a single accident can set back space travel by years if not decades simply due to bad pr so they have to play it safe with stuff like this

    • @PaulADAigle
      @PaulADAigle หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@genericasianperson6405 Understood, by there are decades of development on this sort of thing.

    • @aboucard93
      @aboucard93 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most of these projects just want free money from the government. Other countries penalize companies for not delivering on their projects. They either get sued or go to jail. Singapore gave Ubisoft money for skull and bones which force the company you have to finish the project but America is to corrupt for that.

  • @voyuericu
    @voyuericu หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    “It may be dangerous but it’s cool” 😬

  • @chinmaychandraunshuh
    @chinmaychandraunshuh หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    10:28 wow! Hat's Off 🙏

  • @karstenschuhmann8334
    @karstenschuhmann8334 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The biggest problem of these units is probably that like any other tent they are empty.
    Rigit habitats are not necessarily heavier, but they can be fully equipped before the start. It only needs a larger payload fairing.

  • @SliceofLife7777
    @SliceofLife7777 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a good idea. I've seen vids on inflatable space habs before. I'll bet that balloon hab on the ISS will last as long as the station. Seems to me a good lightweight solution to future habitat in space. So much of a space module's cost is getting it into orbit and perhaps beyond. Light weight, and compact before deployment are both excellent features. Space craft that don't interact with an atmosphere could be at least partially constructed this way. I'm sure the lab nerds have already done puncture repair experiments on the various composite hab walls. These inflatable habs may prove more collision resistant than a ridgid structure, in regards to lower speed collision, such as a resupply mishap.
    Can a radiation shelter be made out of this stuff. Perhaps some hard structures will always be required.
    This might be the way. Even if current prototypes don't have the right stuff yet.

  • @texrifleman
    @texrifleman หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The moon base grow house has star trek dudes in it, 13:42. Funny little inclusion, you gotta love nerdy engineers.

  • @IAmTheAce5
    @IAmTheAce5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I'm imagining that 'nested' layers of inflatable bladders or envelopes would work well for a Whipple Shield, and I'd like to think a great big translucent inflatable sphere would be great for Ender's Game style flying and gaming

  • @TheChoyamoya
    @TheChoyamoya หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great topics on this channel. Thank you!

  • @andreyignatiev1686
    @andreyignatiev1686 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Love your videos

  • @i-love-space390
    @i-love-space390 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The original Von Braun idea was to use an inflatable torus as a structure on which to connect metal plates to complete the station. If he intended to use the inflatable as the station itself, it must have come much later. Watch the Disney movie.

  • @nathansutton5413
    @nathansutton5413 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Much was gained from what was lost is a good line.

  • @benjialexander5850
    @benjialexander5850 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Imagin a future interplanitary ship like star ship that can have an augmented amount of interior volume while in space , and could mean more dedicated area to payload if the living space dosn't have to be a major part of the intirior of starship or any other future crafts. aka INFLATABLE CRAFTS ARE SUPER COOL!

  • @michaelpeslow2839
    @michaelpeslow2839 หลายเดือนก่อน

    another great one. keep it up.

  • @Papio103
    @Papio103 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Truly Awesome ... And Scary

  • @User_hrh4d6-ysi
    @User_hrh4d6-ysi หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Amazing video!!

  • @iEvoke
    @iEvoke หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    go metric or burst

  • @fredburley9512
    @fredburley9512 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant idea.

  • @Unleashed75
    @Unleashed75 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "They are cool, and that's what space exploration is all about."

  • @garyliu6589
    @garyliu6589 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    May be should adopt a hybrid solution by making use of strutural element and shell for mataining shape instead of by pressurization, such it will be much safer.

  • @bbt305
    @bbt305 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “Los Angeles” blimps? Lol their main airport is in fort lauderdale Florida.

  • @Kelnx
    @Kelnx หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'd argue that these inflatable designs are safer than what is currently used with respect to micro meteoroid impacts and even radiation hazards. Many would be surprised at how thin typical spacecraft and even ISS hulls are. Fabrics also can have better armor properties as well as self-sealing abilities built in whereas aluminum or even steel sheets aren't nearly as tough. And in the cold vacuum of space, toughness is more important than hardness.

  • @dcavanau1021
    @dcavanau1021 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With its multi-layer construction, How big a micrometeorite can Sierra Space’s habitat withstand? How does that compare with other metal vehicles, like the ISS or any of the Apollo spacecraft. I thought those were relatively thin b/c there was no air resistance in space.

  • @DeanStephen
    @DeanStephen หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m curious what you mean by “Los Angeles” blimps? To the best of my knowledge, Goodyear doesn’t house any of their blimps in Los Angeles and I think there is only one in California.

  • @undertow2142
    @undertow2142 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How about a nuclear powered space tug and a large rotating ring of inflatable space habitats. Year long cruises out to Jupiter or Saturn would be super sweet.

  • @SlyNation
    @SlyNation หลายเดือนก่อน

    Might be dangerous? I am definitely not a material scientist but some of the tests I have seen, and the accompanying reports that have been published, are quite impressive. At least in space simulating vacuum chambers, micrometeorite/debris strike results on inflatables/soft shell sections have been surprising. They not only hold up better than rigid shell designs, the multi-layer design makes them harder to puncture, and the recent window test broke expectations on strength as well. So far all I have seen are lots of pros and little cons.

  • @bBersZ
    @bBersZ หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ayo! mister Canada guy, it's just "Goodyear Blimps"

  • @oisinmarshall
    @oisinmarshall หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Can you please put in metric system conversions, love the channel but Its annoying trying to figure out the conversions in my head when trying to picture what your talking about
    Keep up the good work thanks👍

    • @ClassicalvsTactical
      @ClassicalvsTactical หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      How about you learn imperial? America is leading the way into space.

    • @yanis905
      @yanis905 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ClassicalvsTacticalThe entire world uses metric. What a joke.

    • @oisinmarshall
      @oisinmarshall หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @ClassicalvsTactical you sould watch real engineering's video on why the imperial system is shite its very educational

    • @ghost307
      @ghost307 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yanis905 Agreed. The metric system is a joke.

    • @ShadeDraws
      @ShadeDraws หลายเดือนก่อน

      Learn Imperial.

  • @alanwhiplington5504
    @alanwhiplington5504 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A velcro-like system could prevent deflation in the event of puncture.

  • @PrabhatKumar-fn4vy
    @PrabhatKumar-fn4vy หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love your channel

  • @AC-cg6mf
    @AC-cg6mf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great videos, though as a viewer from Europe, whenever the imperial system is used, it becomes difficult to understand the scale. Perhaps mention the metric conversion in the video?

    • @bBersZ
      @bBersZ หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not that fkn difficult..

    • @AC-cg6mf
      @AC-cg6mf หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bBersZ Thanks for info.

  • @DampEarth
    @DampEarth หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi. Enjoy your content, but could you please include metrics in your videos? I know a couple of countries in the world use imperial, but most of us have no idea what you're talking about when saying feet and inches. Thank you.

  • @viperswhip
    @viperswhip หลายเดือนก่อน

    If it rotates it could be good, and if there is water in the outershell to stop radiation.

  • @mpdunner3698
    @mpdunner3698 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've always like the inflatable idea. But there is always nothing on the life support system that would be required to make this man-rated for how many months/years?

  • @WJSpies
    @WJSpies หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I guess COVID stuck a pin in this project, huh?

  • @PlanXV
    @PlanXV หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Better than the pay by tron channels 😊

  • @ClassicalvsTactical
    @ClassicalvsTactical หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There is no way BO and SS are getting a station in orbit by 2027.

  • @AnJoniDroidbony
    @AnJoniDroidbony หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please use the metric System!

  • @josepheriah5977
    @josepheriah5977 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good

  • @aaronfimbres8953
    @aaronfimbres8953 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Inflated cars, homes, you name it. New materials make just about anything possible.

  • @SamIIs
    @SamIIs หลายเดือนก่อน

    It could start as an inflatable and end up as a solid structure later.

  • @DeanStephen
    @DeanStephen หลายเดือนก่อน

    Space exploration is all about “being really cool”? Oh my.

  • @mordechai8008
    @mordechai8008 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice idea. But space is not empty. International space station astronauts report small clicks sound from debris particles colliding with the station

  • @silverhurst7241
    @silverhurst7241 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's a real shame you didn't include Sierra Space's overinflation test information, only a picture of it exploding at extremely high pressure, much higher than a traditional station section could sustain. In addition, there are self-healing membranes embedded to seal micro-puncture breaches.
    These are not balloons waiting to pop. Showing the video of it blowing up without context and some of your other comments is misleading and sensationalist.
    The biggest downside to inflatables is the necessity to launch and install interior components separately, another thing not mentioned in your video. This isn't a deal breaker, and may actually end up becoming an advantage, but must be considered.

  • @rgberry69
    @rgberry69 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Are you trying to get/keep subscribers from outside north America? If so, state measurements in both feet and meters. Most of the world uses meters.

  • @AvyScottandFlower
    @AvyScottandFlower 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I was always under the impression Bigelow had just been done wrong by NASA
    With this video it makes sense that the CEO decided to move on, esp during the beginning of the flu thing
    Lots of investing and no return in sight.. time to move on
    Good on the man for his attempt, still.

  • @AkthamAbulHusn
    @AkthamAbulHusn หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    @TheSpaceRaceYT how hard it is to mention the dimensions in metric system along the imperial?? One is fully enjoying your videos until you suddenly mention information that needs one to stop the video (multiple times) and use a calculator or google!! Would you ? please be kind to your international audience? Thanks in advance

  • @rickystarduster
    @rickystarduster หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    inflatable space station astronaut: its chilly out side but its warm inside my nice puffy ballon
    errant meteorite hits station pop. astronaut dies in space.

    • @jonathontinkey3004
      @jonathontinkey3004 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video did not dive deep into the material used but it is not just a balloon that you are thinking of. It did show one brief illustration of the layers involved in the technology. It has several layers of a variety of materials that perform several functions including meteor resistant material, think bullet proof vest, as well as being able to store water in the walls to help address radiation issues. I've been tracking this technology since the "Trans Hab" days and there were test done simulating high velocity impact from micro meteors and the Trans Hab material performed much better than the materials currently making up the ISS. Similar sized objects being fired into comparable materials resulted in objects being pulverized when shot into the Trans Hab material vs. large punctures in materials used in the current ISS makeup. Sadly, I think that only a catastrophic event will force the industry to take a more serious look at this technology.

    • @michaelpettersson4919
      @michaelpettersson4919 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope. The meteorite will create a hole s we get a leak that can and will rapidly be plugged. A minimum of air will escape but not enough to be dangerous. Anyone hurt has been hit by the meteorite or by a panicking colleague. We are talking space here. If the station got a normal pressure atmosphere the pressure difference to the outside is minimal. It is going down, especially in submarines, that quickly rake up dangerous pressure differences. Things for not pop in space without a bomb making it pop.

  • @randywise5241
    @randywise5241 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Space will always be dangerous. No matter the habitat. That is why training and redundant systems will be needed.

  • @user-mz1su7nu5n
    @user-mz1su7nu5n หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah, one tiny weeny micro asteroid or human space junk fly right through, best take a roll of Gaffer tape with you.... lol

  • @jimmywrangles
    @jimmywrangles 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The bubble of Damocles.

  • @tomkenis861
    @tomkenis861 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hasn't there been enough inflation?

  • @vanwaestel
    @vanwaestel หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you make a video about how much donation every one gets from governments compared to private sector eg. Space X

  • @stumpysolo
    @stumpysolo หลายเดือนก่อน

    i thought Orbital Reef is dead as BlueOrigin droped it

  • @desertvoyeur
    @desertvoyeur หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My worry - radiation exposure.

  • @cesaravegah3787
    @cesaravegah3787 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    With so much space junk around earth I would feel naked on one of those

  • @user-er5qu6wq5f
    @user-er5qu6wq5f หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They always show the inflatable habitats with hardly any windows!😢

  • @walterrussell7584
    @walterrussell7584 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Gotta get out there and look around first

  • @damienspectre4231
    @damienspectre4231 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what will it be like inside a Deflatable Space Station?

  • @RyanBlockb5
    @RyanBlockb5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yo bad NASA didn't support Bigelow earlier.

  • @tridentii1903
    @tridentii1903 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it safe, Laurence? ..!.

  • @patrashdigger
    @patrashdigger หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any structure that would support human life in space would be pressurized/, what is really the difference...you would think this would be a good place for NASA to throw big money at

  • @clydecox2108
    @clydecox2108 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Other planets are for suckers it’s hard enough getting off this rock. Give me a few hundred bubbles in space and turn it into a space civilization.

  • @user-er5qu6wq5f
    @user-er5qu6wq5f หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its pretty obvious there was never any type of life on Mars - no fossils, not even of plant life. Not only that but any type of ocean would have no tides...😢

    • @catprog
      @catprog หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why would their be no tides? Mars has the moon and sun.

    • @user-er5qu6wq5f
      @user-er5qu6wq5f หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@catprog Mars doesn't have a large enough moon 🌕

  • @user-gw1rd7uc7s
    @user-gw1rd7uc7s หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah do that

  • @keithmcknight7646
    @keithmcknight7646 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NASA didn’t REALLY want to work with Bigalow.

  • @sirbonobo3907
    @sirbonobo3907 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wernherr ❤️

  • @happyhunter
    @happyhunter หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    NICE POP BALLOON for micro meteors and rocks

    • @bluesteel8376
      @bluesteel8376 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No. They are built with micro meteorites in mind. The layers are very strong.

  • @johnaberm6177
    @johnaberm6177 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just from what he said at the very beginning I'm thinking of the Titanic accident submarine the rich guys down there blowing themselves up or imploding yeah have fun you rich people😂😂😂

  • @walterrussell7584
    @walterrussell7584 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They might have their heart set on Mars but find something else better maybe

  • @777dragonborn
    @777dragonborn หลายเดือนก่อน

    Space balloon? Why just send it up as a balloon like they do satellites and Zeppelins

  • @oobihdahboobeeboppah
    @oobihdahboobeeboppah หลายเดือนก่อน

    Micro meteors?

    • @Wurtoz9643
      @Wurtoz9643 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Accounted for.

  • @juliancrooks3031
    @juliancrooks3031 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If space debris can poke holes in Russian spacecraft wouldn't an inflatable space station pop like a balloon?

  • @theenchiladakid1866
    @theenchiladakid1866 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At last you won't know if you get hit by space junk

  • @splinter2121
    @splinter2121 หลายเดือนก่อน

    some one is nerfing human research....its starts to be obvius

  • @NicholasNerios
    @NicholasNerios หลายเดือนก่อน

    To bad Bigelow was ahead of its time.

  • @AnuwktootLee-yf9ff
    @AnuwktootLee-yf9ff หลายเดือนก่อน

    Universe se cute tango toh minerals se cure

  • @aboucard93
    @aboucard93 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Elon and SpaceX are the only ones serious about space.

  • @steveadams7550
    @steveadams7550 หลายเดือนก่อน

    OK. SNC proved that if you overinflate to an absurd value a LIFE module it will blow up. What happens if you inflate to the operational value and shoot holes in it. Does it fall apart or is it stable so you can patch the holes.

    • @jimgoplayoutsideable
      @jimgoplayoutsideable หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Of course it's stable. That's a basic design requirement. If it wasn't they wouldn't even consider further testing. Also, you dont need to actually poke a hole in a complete structure just to find out. And if they did, it really isn't very exciting to watch... That big pop was pretty cool to watch. But they did it to find out the failure pressure so they can calculate safety margins. It's a requirement by the regulatory body (faa?)

    • @steveadams7550
      @steveadams7550 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jimgoplayoutsideable I'm guessing that it is a nasa requirement.

  • @SeptemberMeadows
    @SeptemberMeadows หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B330 mockup would be more impressive if they deployed it in a giant vacuum chamber and it only could be entered using actual space suits.

  • @ingridhohmann3523
    @ingridhohmann3523 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hope we dont end with tourism 😪

  • @tekno03
    @tekno03 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    why not using metric system? :)

    • @ShadeDraws
      @ShadeDraws หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why not using Imperial system?

    • @bluesteel8376
      @bluesteel8376 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ShadeDraws Science and Space are generally done in metric.

  • @lopasspace
    @lopasspace หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Space race only deserves 4M subs

  • @pedromartinsesouza9935
    @pedromartinsesouza9935 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please use meters! Only the US uses feet and inches. 😑

  • @AnuwktootLee-yf9ff
    @AnuwktootLee-yf9ff หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hai toh damin hi

  • @dmr6640
    @dmr6640 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If plants are grown in the inflatable modules, might the plant shoots or roots grow through the inflatable material and create a puncture resulting in a catastrophic failure?

    • @kevingee4294
      @kevingee4294 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just cactus....

    • @dmr6640
      @dmr6640 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kevingee4294 lol