This Is NASA's New Space Station...And it just exploded

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2024
  • NASA's ISS won't be around for much longer so they are partnering with companies like Sierra Space for the next generation of Space Station and it's going to be inflatable!
    Last Video: How SpaceX Reinvented The Launch Pad!
    • How SpaceX Reinvented ...
    ►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
    ►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
    ► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
    ► Patreon: / theteslaspace
    ► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
    Mars Colonization News and Updates
    • Mars Colonization News...
    SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
    The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
    ► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
    Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
    #Spacex #Space #Mars
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 552

  • @TheSpaceRaceYT
    @TheSpaceRaceYT  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    If you enjoy the content and would like to support the team here at The Space Race:
    ►Become a member today: th-cam.com/channels/eMc.html...
    ►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
    ► Join Our Discord Server: discord.gg/zfMNSnuRQN
    ► Patreon: www.patreon.com/theteslaspace

    • @DeltaNovum
      @DeltaNovum 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm guessing a very long hose to supply air and water would be less of a engineering problem than an actual space lift? If we had an easy supply of those, paired with these kinds of modules, space fairing would become exponentially easier. Especially if we get a moon base and a moon mine running.

    • @batcollins3714
      @batcollins3714 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Living in a low gravity of zero gravity environment caused huge damage to the human body as we have evolved over millions of years to survive under Earth conditions. Zero or low gravity causes brittle bones and weak muscles. Living in space is a no brainer.

  • @anteros__
    @anteros__ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +606

    I think the concept is very promising and I'm glad that these tests are proving that. I do think that they should do a test launch and have the habitat sit dormant for at least 3-5 months in space just to observe what could happen in that short period of time with the outer structure.

    • @nmjgd4083
      @nmjgd4083 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      I think it should be even longer. But it shouldn't be simply for testing. No one should live for a year or year and half. And every 3-4 months they should add new capsule. This is long enough time period and good enough indicator to see the amount of damage. Which it would take in space. Afterwards, if result are bad simply redo. Or let's hope it is success and directly start using space station which now only needs to interior stuff to fill it.

    • @WhiskeyAfterHours
      @WhiskeyAfterHours 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its a good thought but no company has the funding to do what you just described. Sierra does plan on an intital pathfinder mission for their LIFE technology in 2026@@nmjgd4083

    • @unincognito3689
      @unincognito3689 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      There has already been an earlier design on the ISS for 8 years. That long enough for ya?

    • @simonallan9941
      @simonallan9941 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes and thats where a pressure test should be tried.

    • @Planet-Anime
      @Planet-Anime 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They always de test launches you don't need to worry

  • @allanturmaine5496
    @allanturmaine5496 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

    Basketweaving in space. It's weird to see the "tech tree" coming full circle.

    • @Guardrailkid
      @Guardrailkid 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      they just need a few science points to unlock it "inflatables", it's a hustle accepting "Save Graemy from mun's low orbit" contracts though 🤣

    • @SewTubular
      @SewTubular หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What happens if aliens launch a giant sewing needle at the inflatable space station ?

    • @allanturmaine5496
      @allanturmaine5496 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SewTubular Men In Black? This post right here. He's working for the aliums.

  • @XAirForce
    @XAirForce 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +344

    OK, but when the giant space cat comes along and starts playing with your ball of yarn, don’t come complaining to me😂. It actually looks like something you would use to crochet with

    • @ralph3728
      @ralph3728 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      How do you know about the giant space cat?

    • @SkellyMcBones
      @SkellyMcBones 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@ralph3728 connections obviously

    • @circle4602
      @circle4602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      what if we pointed a laser at a nearby asteroid to distract the giant space cat

    • @user-iy9cy4tl2h
      @user-iy9cy4tl2h 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😅😊👍👍😸

    • @nickv1212
      @nickv1212 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Damn. Don't be surprised if you find lasers being pointed at your head, but instead of getting a bullet you're gonna get a giant space paw smacking you.

  • @jormungandrtheworldserpent8382
    @jormungandrtheworldserpent8382 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +235

    the biggest hurdle this tech has to get over is peoples perception of what makes a strong station even with things like Kevlar to prove otherwise people mostly still think something cant be both flexible and strong

    • @shanent5793
      @shanent5793 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      They'll get over it if it's cheap enough

    • @nmjgd4083
      @nmjgd4083 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      I don't think that is a big problem. The first ones will be for scientists either way. (We will have humanities bravest and smartest as test subjects LOL)
      After people see the result, thats it.

    • @N04hrk
      @N04hrk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      humans intrusive thoughts are gonna trash this idea. like: "i wonder if it will brake if i poke it with a pencil." xD

    • @shanent5793
      @shanent5793 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@dansmith16 sewing is women's work anyways so it's not a problem

    • @billykorando6820
      @billykorando6820 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nmjgd4083yea agreed, the mass public isn’t going up into space anytime soon. These technologies would have many years, of being proven out before any general public steps… or I guess floats aboard.

  • @DrVelvetPHD
    @DrVelvetPHD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    I used to work as a janitor at the SNC building in Louisville, CO. I got to watch the dream chaser being built. Such a cool experience!

    • @OurSpaceshipEarth
      @OurSpaceshipEarth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Spy! *pointing!*

    • @DrVelvetPHD
      @DrVelvetPHD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@OurSpaceshipEarth lol, that's what they seemed to be worried about. Absolute no pictures! There was even papers (that I probably shouldn't have read) where our government was warning about the likelihood of Chinese and Russian interference.

  • @Tinman_56
    @Tinman_56 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    Perhaps this life module should be advertised as an expanding habitat and not an inflatable one unless, of course, if it requires the air pressure to remain "inflated." The interior design and the equipment installed would be interesting to see. ISS is a nightmare with wires and equipment and such.

    • @Tinman_56
      @Tinman_56 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @piisfun if air pressure is required to keep the module inflated, then it won't be safe for astronauts to live and work inside it for long durations. Even though there's been one on the ISS for a couple of years, it has yet to be seen in any NASA videos as being used in ISS activities. These modules would be best utilized as lifeboats more than anything else.

    • @ShiftyMcGoggles
      @ShiftyMcGoggles 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I can definitely see the module having a solid trunking core for cable/pipe management that goes down the length of it, to each of the modules' ends, with the idea of building divider fins outward from there to create separate rooms where needed. Deployment in space would be interesting, but possible.

    • @Tinman_56
      @Tinman_56 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@piisfun that's the part that is concerning. If we need to keep it pressurized, other than for breathing purposes, then it's not very structurally sound to support electronics, electrical, and scientific equipment and living quarters. 😎

  • @BaBa-rs2pg
    @BaBa-rs2pg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    I love your videos, but the clickbaiting titles are unnecessary in my opinion

    • @nadca2
      @nadca2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Not NASA and this burst test happened two weeks ago!

    • @echelonrank3927
      @echelonrank3927 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nadca2 obsolete

    • @lebronjamesharden3958
      @lebronjamesharden3958 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      this channel is better than most space clickbaiter channels tbh

    • @SentinalhMC
      @SentinalhMC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      They're absolutely necessary to appear in the algorithm

    • @xFKNTOOLx
      @xFKNTOOLx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@SentinalhMC nah. There must be some level of integrity.

  • @Rkwlgjender
    @Rkwlgjender 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    4:17 I could see a potentially cool use of thermal imaging for inspecting the integrity of the station as mmod strikes occur. When looking from the inside, any spots with temperature differences could indicate a puncture in the thermal layer, and the scale of that temperature difference would show how many layers were impacted

  • @pleasureincontempt3645
    @pleasureincontempt3645 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    In Futurama, the spaceship was going invlountarily into an ocean to experience several atmospheres of pressure.
    When asked how deep the ship could go, the captain (Leela) could only assert that the ship was rated for only 0 Atmosheres.
    Brilliant writers!

    • @NoNameAtAll2
      @NoNameAtAll2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      a) it was professor who answered
      b) it is a spaceship, so it's rated somewhere between 0 atmospheres and 1

    • @marsrocket
      @marsrocket หลายเดือนก่อน

      There’s an xkcd video about submarines in space that’s the same kind of thing

  • @youtubeisapublisher6407
    @youtubeisapublisher6407 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Just to be completely clear, even a soft rubber-composition space station would not "pop like a balloon" if pierced by a micrometeorite, or under basically any other circumstance unless it was demolished with explosives. The pressure at which tires for example explode is around 200psi, or about 14-15x atmospheric pressure, that is, the difference between the pressure inside of the tire and outside is something like +13-14 Bar. The maximum possible difference between the inside and outside of a space station in air pressure is, for obvious reasons, only +1 Bar. This also assumes that the station is actually pressurized to one full atmosphere, which is doesn't have to be at all, it could drop as low as 70% normal pressure and given a few hours of acclimation time the astronauts living aboard it would be none the worse for wear.
    The major issue of a soft rubber "balloon" station would be wear and tear from heat cycling, which is the same thing that's wearing the ISS down now. In direct sunlight the temperature in Earth Orbit can get as hot as the inside of a convection oven, while in shadow on the opposite side of the planet it can be more than -200F. These kinds of thermal stresses would in a matter of only a few cycles, rapidly demolish any manmade structure not specifically insulated by layers of para-aramid fiber and high-albedo metal (like the ISS is) away until they became brittle and simply fell apart. That's why nobody plans to use rubber for an expandable station, because it would dry out, crack, and basically disintegrate rapidly in the environment of space.

  • @ardma02
    @ardma02 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Once again, great video!!!! I know all of this information already and still watched every second of this video.

  • @DundG
    @DundG 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Music in the background? Love the ambience!
    And good gournalism on these projects. Keep them comin!

  • @tubepets8055
    @tubepets8055 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    On one of my other channels, I have a vid that mentions an idea I dreamed up about putting a scaffolding structure baround the balloon, and then placing high impact "shingles" say 3ft by 3ft on that structure. Results in an extra layer of protection , including from posible impacts of other space vehicles or their engines. The structure can also be used as a place to hold or store other things such as for spacewalks, etc.

  • @jasonl3445
    @jasonl3445 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video thanks for sharing :)

  • @TheZombieSaints
    @TheZombieSaints 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I've got a piece of Skylab in a block of acrylic. Just looks like a piece of burned fibreglass or maybe a kevlar type of material. Still pretty cool though I reckon. Great video BTW. I've been wondering how the inflatable pod things have been going

    • @bennichols1113
      @bennichols1113 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is very cool.

    • @petert3355
      @petert3355 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do know NASA got fined for Skylab right. To this day, they still have not paid up yet.

  • @stringercorrales6627
    @stringercorrales6627 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now that you mention it, I remember seeing old sketches of space stations that look inflatable but couldn’t guess why they looked a certain way until now.

  • @mrchapin94
    @mrchapin94 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Just imagine how many of those you could put in the starship.

    • @nadca2
      @nadca2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nasa is going to accomplish so much with their starship

    • @mrchapin94
      @mrchapin94 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @nadca2 I rather nasa focus perfecting. Now life supports for space stations and rockets. Instead of the making rockets, they're supposed to be the big R&D help. That's why they're letting private sectors take over the rocket making.

    • @ginglebret
      @ginglebret หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You haven't been paying enough attention to Starship apparently. The whole project is an ill-conceived and poorly executed mess.

    • @mrchapin94
      @mrchapin94 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ginglebret that's true but I want us to start building bigger space stations building them in space in a locked orbit

  • @malkeus6487
    @malkeus6487 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Tire rubber does terrible in intense sunlight, drys out and cracks in a matter of months. Combine that with vacuum doing whatever it would do... I'd hate to be in a space tire when it zippers..

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do remember a vacuum is less pressure than most tires have to maintain. But yeah sunlight would absolutely fuck it. And one thing the vacuum could do is have outgassing be worse and potentially could damage the rubber?

  • @jameswilson5165
    @jameswilson5165 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    SPMS Stay Puff Marshmellow Station. Let's get 'em up and Puffed!

  • @norliasmith
    @norliasmith 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Safety factor of 5:1 for the pressure rating, decent numbers

  • @sawtoothspike
    @sawtoothspike 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    How do they handle the internals? surely you would want some subdivision and infrastructure inside

    • @jfjoubertquebec
      @jfjoubertquebec 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A large system of carbon fibre and titanium rings hold it together ;)

    • @peterhans3791
      @peterhans3791 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Interior walls don't need to be structural. Just some sturdy fabric, which you could sew in wires and such into.

    • @tsugaru_solos
      @tsugaru_solos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pop-up books come to mind

  • @cosmickitteh
    @cosmickitteh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:53 sounds like one of those special scooters really big people use

  • @d3str0i3r
    @d3str0i3r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    important to note just how high a pressure that thing exploded at, they had two failures in that test, and the only failure they had before target pressure was in the hard metal fittings they were using to inflate the structure, i'm also rolling this around in my head and i'm not seeing any reason for hard portions of the station? except maybe in an intersection of four or more units

  • @fastshuther
    @fastshuther 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm glad this has been picking up over the years

  • @i-love-space390
    @i-love-space390 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good video with a lot of info.
    It is a real horse race to see which company will be operational in LEO first.
    Personally, I would love to see Sierra ditch BO and partner with JAXA. The JAXA modules on the ISS are almost a space station by itself, with its own crew quarters and robot arm.
    Although I know you love the Dream Chaser, (so do I), but it has yet to fly in CARGO CONFIGURATION. Flying a CREW-rated Dream Chaser is still going to take some time. For reference let us recall the length of time between Cargo Dragon and Dragon 2 Crew.
    Crew rated vehicles are much tougher to certify than Cargo spacecraft. SpaceX made it a point to create Cargo Dragon with a pressurized module and deliberately built it with the human rating process in mind. It still took them over 7 years from the Cargo Dragon's 1st docking to make the manned successor operational. Hopefully, Crew Dream Chaser will not be as extensive of a modification as Dragon 2 was, but my bet is at least 2-3 Years for NASA certification. And I would doubt anyone will fly until it is NASA certified. The only alternative would be FAA certification, which let's be realistic, is even SLOWER.

  • @Adyen11234
    @Adyen11234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Huh. Can this be used for ocean habitats as well? It could also revolutionize the possible living spaces of humans on Earth itself.

  • @teddycook1299
    @teddycook1299 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds like a Titan submersible situation...

    • @petert3355
      @petert3355 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nope, the exact opposite, in fact.
      This is how composite materials are supposed to work.

  • @loadingnewads
    @loadingnewads 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Expected
    Waiting for another one to be tested

  • @DFord-rv3nz
    @DFord-rv3nz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used to do the same thing as a kid with a fitted sheet and a box fan.

  • @jimfoard5671
    @jimfoard5671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Of course! Why didn't I think of that!

  • @knottyboy6086
    @knottyboy6086 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You would have to be nuts to get in that. Totally nuts.

  • @angellestat5937
    @angellestat5937 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:15
    Pyrocinical must be crying right now from the happiness

  • @danieltolkachov2404
    @danieltolkachov2404 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the biggest plus of this kind of spacestation, is that even if presumably a micrometeorite damages one of the modules, it will be long before the module will explode since it has numerous protective layers. This allows all the crew in that module to evacuate, deflate the module, and then order a new one replacing it, while not needing to immediately going back to earth.

  • @HamguyBacon
    @HamguyBacon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I believe a spray foam in a cavity in-between the layers when it is in orbit would be more practical than trying to pressurize the balloon and relying 100% on that for structural support.
    60psi is twice an average car tire which is not much.

  • @EleyReiHer
    @EleyReiHer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice technology to withstand the incoming pressure

  • @snudget
    @snudget 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where do I get one of these?

  • @triggerbunny
    @triggerbunny 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting...but by the time these concepts become reality (if they ever do..) SpaceX will have probably already produced better ships that no longer need to to do splash downs in the ocean anymore considering the leaps that SpaceX is constantly making. As for the inflatable pods, look forward to seeing actual testing in orbit.

  • @SMGJohn
    @SMGJohn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you have cost cutting measures in space, thats always a bad sign, its a cool concept, but this is the definition of cost cutting and will have a shelf life below that of metal structures.
    Space is safer and easier to travel in then the deep ocean thats for sure but the thing is, how often would you need to replace these modules? And what if you have a maniac with a very sharp knife onboard?

  • @ericjohnson7234
    @ericjohnson7234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is a cool design. I have an idea for a cheap solution if it can become cheap in the future. is to have a jacket buckle system for your inflatable balloon space station. Whereby, this jacket buckle system will have a series of metal plates designed specifically to prevent the micro meteor shower from destroying your inflatable, by having the jacket and buckle fasten these metal plates out to a certain distance in all directions except for the dockeing system, so to slow down these incoming risks to your space craft or station,. as well having the foundry and manufactury inbuilt into this station that will replace thses pieces by recycling, so you may have a self sustaining system that works for the community that uses it.

  • @vermilion7777
    @vermilion7777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They should make a space station with walls made of 5 meters of stone, so the astronauts don't get erradiated...

  • @Stuff_And_Things
    @Stuff_And_Things 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm sure they did the math, but a balloon inflated at 60psi at sea level experiences different stress than 60psi in a vacuum.
    I thought they were going to have a self-seal layer on these things.
    Looking forward to see these things deployed. I didn't know they already had an earlier version of this as part of the ISS. That certainly gives greater confidence. ;)

  • @Petertwohig1948
    @Petertwohig1948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I must have missed the bit about how it resists a vacuum.

    • @NoNameAtAll2
      @NoNameAtAll2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      vacuum is nothingness
      video covers difference in pressure and meteorites

  • @mattg7269
    @mattg7269 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about using a fluid layer to plug holes that happened

  • @bestkind123
    @bestkind123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I understand there just as save but I can’t even imagine how scary it would be up there with nothing around but to be in a inflatable bubble in space or if it was on the moon or somthing would be even more terrifying

  • @kyzercube
    @kyzercube 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Graphene composites are making huge breakthroughs right now. I wonder if Sierra Space is utilizing this in any of their MMOD layers.

  • @davidpalmer7175
    @davidpalmer7175 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well... whether it's metal or plastic...we can only build anything with what we develop for materials. If it works in the vacuum of space, which is the most extreme of any vacuum... then it can work anywhere in space. Extreme pressures is a completely different animal because there's no limit to pressure. A complete vacuum is final in its' form.

  • @clydecox2108
    @clydecox2108 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m stoked

  • @grandperspective1167
    @grandperspective1167 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is dope, I feel like will see a giant structure of the inflatable habitats all connected!
    I do have a question why haven’t we try mining close to earth asteroids and just make structures/ships in space? Wouldn’t that take a lot of load off earth to space manufacturing?

  • @LeftInStone
    @LeftInStone 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is SO EXCITINGGGGGGG

  • @jeffreyyoung4104
    @jeffreyyoung4104 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you take many of these units and attach them in a ring, you could rotate the ring, inducing a micro gravity.

    • @shrub9677
      @shrub9677 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      youd need an unreasonable amount of them to make a ring even close to big enough to do that without making the astronauts sick

  • @yatox8
    @yatox8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A bouncy house in LEO, sign me up. Sounds fun!

  • @1darkthought
    @1darkthought 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What happened to the Bigelow Aerospace inflatable module that was attached to the ISS?

  • @skwervin1
    @skwervin1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Those habitats can also be used for moon bases too

  • @george1la
    @george1la 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pretty interesting. Impact is a big problem.

  • @jroar123
    @jroar123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You did say "Today" when talking about a rocket that could get something as large as the first or was it the second stage of the Apollo rocket into orbit and be able to use it as a habitat like Skylab. Starship is getting close to being able to blow Apollo away on power and size. And, it's made out of stainless steel. It is still in the testing phase but that shouldn't take but a few more years. I would like to see an inflatable habitat the size of a football field. Tons of room for equipment, water reclamation systems, power generation, vegetational growth areas, DCS, PLCs, ESD, and a lot more, and still have room to allow humans to feel very comfortable for the ride to Mars or further.

  • @TheForkU
    @TheForkU 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The great mystery of why Pyrocynical's been edging for 27 years has been revealed.

  • @jimzielinski946
    @jimzielinski946 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is the material "self sealing" like the rubber gas tanks on military aircraft?

    • @Dev05-fr5np
      @Dev05-fr5np 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m guessing future iterations would be but not current one because I don’t know if they can withstand the intense temperatures of space or they might even work differently in the vacuum

  • @hadleymanmusic
    @hadleymanmusic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Make the outer shell double walled filled after inflation with poly urethane foam and whaterver filler.

  • @berzerkvideos655
    @berzerkvideos655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know if anyone was thinking this but I know I think it's very cool, but the way PRESSURE works is very fascinating. You might think 15 > 60 PSI isn't a big jump, but you have to remember that when it says Pounds Per Square Inch, it REALLY means that. A 12 inch by 12 inch balloon that only inflates a few inches high (like 5?) at maybe... 6 PSI? That is *_4,320 pounds._* BALLOONS are utilized to lift *BOULDERS* off of people in collapsed buildings. The space station looked to be several *FEET* tall and a good few feet wide. At 15 PSI, the internal pressure was maybe... Let's just say 60x60x90 at 15 PSI, that's 4,860,000 pounds over a large area. Because of dispersion and the square cube law, this pressure isn't that bad on a human body or even the walls although it is enough to actively push the walls OUTWARDS. Which keeps it inflated. Now 60x60x90 at _60_ PSI is 19,440,000 POUNDS. That's, again, like 4 times as strong, but when you're at numbers as big this that's like punching a wall Vs. dropping a NUKE on it. I'm not crazy about Physics so I don't know all the equations so I'm sure someone with more knowledge could explain it more indepth but those are some crazy numbers to think about.

  • @seanburton5298
    @seanburton5298 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And this will be what I am very interested in.

  • @rolandjaycutter3504
    @rolandjaycutter3504 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The one thing I'm concerned about is moving the MSS around it, I haven't seen connections on any of the renders so far. Still hopeful.

  • @hadleymanmusic
    @hadleymanmusic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dont forget this weave for moon hab.

  • @DanielVerberne
    @DanielVerberne 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would have thought that these examples aren't 'space stations', but modular components that could make up a PART of a station or habitat.

  • @BORCHLEO
    @BORCHLEO 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Honestly, i think no matter one if you launch one of these into space something is gonna pop. anyways you aint seein me ride in that thing

  • @HippyBastard
    @HippyBastard 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the MMOD material is similar to Kevlar, I wonder what the lifespan of it is. Most Kevlar body armor has an expiration date of 5 years, are these exteriors going to be a consumable? If so, is there going to be a (relatively) simple solution to transfer interior equipment from old to new? would the entire module become trash? Id love to see more on this. Great video, sir.

    • @link7417
      @link7417 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well they claim its the same material on the inflatable section on the iss that have been there for 8 years now,

  • @gytispranskunas4984
    @gytispranskunas4984 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It should be safer than steel because at the pressure of 15psi which as we saw 5 times less than maximum tensal strength, baloon would just simply bend in, absorbing the force of impact and than poping back in to shape. Worst thing that can happen is crew getting bumped by the bend. Also its unrealistic scenario because object in the impact has to be pretty big to ve able to do that

  • @Archangel657
    @Archangel657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Space is going to be inflatable!"
    *random

  • @scottthomas3792
    @scottthomas3792 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A car tire doesn't explode if you run over a nail....these inflatable stations wouldn't blow up from micrmeteor impact.. it's sort of a really big spacesuit you live in. This may very well be the future.

    • @link7417
      @link7417 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well explode is not quite the right word, the issue is rapid "decompression" (I think that is the right word) I have been near some tractor tires that burst and it very well could had been an explosion from the sound lol

  • @tomdave42
    @tomdave42 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My number one question would be how are they going to prevent the astronauts from being irradiated

  • @LunaProtege
    @LunaProtege 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hmm... I wonder if one could make a massive structure like this and get it into space just by having it packed up and inflate it on delivery: maybe make something like an O'Neal cylinder style build, but inflatable.

  • @feltonhamilton21
    @feltonhamilton21 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good now the next thing to do now is to make giant oxygen space tanks and water tanks using the same material.

  • @twitchy.mp3
    @twitchy.mp3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I cant wait for space station super cities

  • @almightyyt2101
    @almightyyt2101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are they easier to upgrade and expand?

  • @Mionikoi
    @Mionikoi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This sounds nice and all. I'm just curious about what point we are going to start planning 'spinning habitats' for more permanent space stations.

    • @kipkipper-lg9vl
      @kipkipper-lg9vl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      requires heavy built station, way more money to build and operate, no one will pay for that currently

  • @moistshit1kal
    @moistshit1kal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about Whipple shielding

  • @Toqueville2023
    @Toqueville2023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It was a test. The damn station didn't blow up! It was a TEST ONLY!

    • @MrAlbertaSurfer
      @MrAlbertaSurfer 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Which is exactly what the video states...

    • @dabartos4713
      @dabartos4713 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Where tf is the outrage culture when one needs it. Damn thing is dying off.

    • @BisexualPlagueDoctor
      @BisexualPlagueDoctor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It says that in the first two minutes

    • @BisexualPlagueDoctor
      @BisexualPlagueDoctor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dabartos4713over this? Nah man

  • @greenspiraldragon
    @greenspiraldragon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about use the inflatable to make a epoxy resin space station. It will have a lot more strength. Use the same type system they use to line pipes.

  • @MrFreesearcher
    @MrFreesearcher 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is certainly a step forwards for space exploration, and exciting, but also don't forget that the outside pressure is zero PSI, so the structure would need to survive this mismatch in pressures. Surviving to 75 PSI is great, on Earth, where the outside pressure is 16PSI (75 - 16 = 59 PSI in Space), so does it actually pass NASA's requirements, or was the requirements based on Earth pressure?
    For concernes of debris ripping or damaging the "Balloon", a multi layered metal jacket could be expanded over the outside. I know this is adding more weight, and I am also curious how man made resins and fabrics operate and last in space - fiberglass hulls for example. Of course fiberglass has its own dangers when astronauts are working with the material.

  • @OzzyFella
    @OzzyFella 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    space ocean gate gon be wild

  • @yotu9670
    @yotu9670 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So far. But when starship flies size doesn’t matter Anymore

    • @WhiskeyAfterHours
      @WhiskeyAfterHours 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tell me you didnt watch the video without telling me you didnt watch the video

  • @davidhuffman4036
    @davidhuffman4036 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's only a meteorite when it strikes ground. You meant to say micro meteors and dust (fragments)

  • @Falador321
    @Falador321 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wondering how this is going to fair against small objects in space that puncture metal (its even happened to the ISS)

  • @mariuszmoraw3571
    @mariuszmoraw3571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I still see this base more as temporary solution where we could build something more permanent and house crew building it there.

  • @DavidGalich77
    @DavidGalich77 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is coming!

    • @ChargersCity
      @ChargersCity 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever

  • @virtualworldsbyloff
    @virtualworldsbyloff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope the video explains how they handle micro meteors...

  • @aishikrana3500
    @aishikrana3500 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So if the micro mitiorite hits it , it not gonna deastroy the whole thing , but it will gonna destroy the 1st 2 layers? that means once a micro mitiorite hits, oxidation prevention gone and thermal insulation gone. Obviously it prevented instant damage but shortened it's life significantly.

  • @pazsion
    @pazsion 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    well you could build a hard shell inside the inglatable for even more shielding... but without avoidance ststems its still going to get hit by something bigger than it is... including satalites and rtg or fully active full sized nuclear reactors .... yup we put those in irbit around our earth too 🤷‍♂️

  • @Praetoreon
    @Praetoreon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Anyone feel like this is a really bad idea and they just haven’t realized it yet?

  • @kkalauli23
    @kkalauli23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hell no id hate to be first ones to test anything in space or the ocean floors lol

  • @neilmackenzie4394
    @neilmackenzie4394 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Here's a thought, let's use the "Space Modules" and a tiny portion of the money to explore the Oceans of our home planet.

  • @Nopejams
    @Nopejams 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder why not fill a liner within the balloon with a gel

  • @Markty07
    @Markty07 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would it be possible to recycle parts of the ISS for use on another space station ?

  • @user-sg2fw6ze7n
    @user-sg2fw6ze7n 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    풍선이 안전하지 않다면 기술이 발전될때까지 계속 개발하고, 3단봉처럼 옆으로 쇠가 우주나서 늘어나서 공간을 늘리는 방식으로 공간확보를해야할듯?

  • @JerymeVoidal
    @JerymeVoidal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like the Tictac UAP

  • @MilkzyVR
    @MilkzyVR 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    so in theory we could transport these through longer distances via spacecrafts and end up putting a space station near the moon?

  • @Merrorh
    @Merrorh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder, is it possible to bring anti-meteorite armor separately? I mean, if it doesn't have to be airtight, just slap some sheets above this balloon: it's not like there is a limit, when station is already on orbit.

    • @mahonriyojimbo2092
      @mahonriyojimbo2092 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cost is likely to be one factor.
      Keep in mind that "anti-meteorite armor" is not just armor plating. Modern spacecraft use things like the Whipple shield; a multi-layer armor not designed to just stop micro-meteors. Instead the first layer breaks up the meteor and disperses it layer by layer into smaller and smaller bits that each successive layer is more likely to stop.
      While this is much lighter than simple armor plating, it ironically requires much larger payloads than armor plating to get into space. So while it's cheaper to launch by weight, it may take more rockets to get it into space either way.

  • @snaplash
    @snaplash 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Instead of just pumping it up until it pops, they should just keep it at normal pressure while launching various projectiles. Nuts, bolts, metal scraps, etc. Try to simulate what happens if minor space junk poles holes in it.

    • @mahonriyojimbo2092
      @mahonriyojimbo2092 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's another test entirely. As mentioned earlier in the video, NASA's regulations require this thing to be able to withstand 60psi. Thus they need to confirm it can do that before they worry about meteor impacts.
      Additionally, they already have testing data on it withstanding projectiles that simulate such impacts; generally speaking, such data can be extrapolated to show how it will respond when inflated.
      In the world of engineering, testing for more than one thing at the same time is not always practical, let alone reliable. These things need to take one step at a time, and this is one of those steps.

  • @hadleymanmusic
    @hadleymanmusic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That a nose brake on that space plane?

  • @tonytor5346
    @tonytor5346 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    From a doctoral level physicist :due aerogel sheets in the middle, and tiny ceramic tiles mixed in on the outside surface. Onemore thing, used on self sealing fighter jet fuel tanks on pin the middle layer.
    Contact me for more ideas.