What Life Inside The Orbital Reef Space Station Will Be Like!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.พ. 2023
  • What Life Inside The Orbital Reef Space Station Will Be Like!
    Last Video: What Life Inside The SpaceX Starship Will Be Like!
    • What Life Inside The S...
    ► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
    ► Patreon: / theteslaspace
    ► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
    Mars Colonization News and Updates
    • Mars Colonization News...
    SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
    The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
    ► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
    Business Email: derek@ellify.com
    #Spacex #Space #Mars
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 420

  • @hawksboy
    @hawksboy ปีที่แล้ว +284

    Space development is going to be like the internet's development. The internet developed slowly for decades and then, boom, massive investment and exponential growth hit almost overnight. I think we're on the cusp of that right now in space development. When Starship starts working, everybody and their uncle is going to try to get into the game, and then the fun begins. Private space stations, moon bases, asteroid mining and things we haven't thought of yet will start coming in AHEAD of schedule because to fall behind is to lose the race. The bad new is WW3 will probably start in the Shackleton crater.

    • @dumitrulangham1721
      @dumitrulangham1721 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Totally agree!

    • @qa1e2r4
      @qa1e2r4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      the things that no one have imagined start with LEO factories that will orbital drop their products leading to orbital elevators for rising the raw materials( not the moronic tethered variants ) combined with radiation enrichment plants combined with some solar farms. Next will be space born humans for interstellar crews(asteroid mining/flight/factory workers etc.) and yes it all starts this year.

    • @egomaniac8510
      @egomaniac8510 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Look how well that turned out

    • @dustinswatsons9150
      @dustinswatsons9150 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Fuck I hope people don't kill each other tomorrow

    • @rustyshackleford234
      @rustyshackleford234 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      We are finally getting all the cool stuff in our timeline. if only the soviets didn’t give up in the space race 😒😒😒

  • @ClassicalvsTactical
    @ClassicalvsTactical ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Axiom Space is going to be the world's first commercial space station. Orbital Reef is a concept at best, and knowing BO it'll fly in 20 years.

    • @runningray
      @runningray ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Axiom is literary building modules right now. Axiom will be in orbit 3-4 years from now. At best Orbital Reef (I am being generous to Orbital Reef here) will be in orbit by the end of this decade.

    • @loudmoderns5092
      @loudmoderns5092 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      LOL! Knowing BO, Orbital Reef is twenty years away, and always will be.

    • @stainlesssteelfox1
      @stainlesssteelfox1 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The only partners I expect to deliver on time are Sierra Space. They have built actual flight hardware for Dreamchaser, and test models of habitats.
      Blue Origin, for all it's suborbital successes, have failed to deliver New Glenn, and have only just started providing the BE4 engie to Vulcan, never mind producing enough for New Glenn, years behind schedule. And then there's Boeing, with their Starliner debacle and the massively delayed SLS core stage. The institutional knowledge is there, but the project management ability is not.

    • @johnstewart579
      @johnstewart579 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Agreed. As long as Blue Origin is run by Jeff Bezo , Axiom Space will be the first private space station

    • @Wildboy789789
      @Wildboy789789 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your all crazy... orbital reef will be fully operational in 2027... "concept at best" really? Then what are all these sierra space LIFE habitats im seeing get tested? The orbital reef windows are being tested on the ISS right now, they were sent up last week

  • @i-love-space390
    @i-love-space390 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    A lot of what made the ISS so expensive to build was the limited launch capability of the time, the expense of the Space Shuttle, the delays caused by 3-4 redesigns of the ISS as its mission changed and just the stretching out of the length of time of the construction.
    (It turns out that when you slow development by limiting funds, it usually ends up costing MORE than if you just bite the bullet and "get 'er done".)
    If New Glenn ever gets operational, not only its fairing will be large, but its payload capacity will be significant - on the order of the Falcon Heavy. If its reusability pans out, that will also cut the cost of payload to orbit. Couple that with the inflatable module technology, and you get a lot of internal volume for less cost.
    Also, the Orbital Reef will be constructed more like the Chinese and Russian space stations in that it will be a bunch of modules simply docked together. No stupid truss segments to construct. Hopefully, they will have some of the better ideas of the ISS, such as wiring and duct work that goes outside of the station rather than inside the passageways between modules, like on Mir. (That created quite a problem on Mir when the fire broke out, because they had to remove duct work and wiring between modules before they could seal off a section.)
    I think they can beat the Chinese cost effectiveness once they get the launch vehicles in place.

  • @ericblanchard5873
    @ericblanchard5873 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The Dreamchaser shuttle looks a lot like the test ship of John Criteon in the show Farscape.

    • @jebes909090
      @jebes909090 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      oh boy..........

  • @mikesbasement6954
    @mikesbasement6954 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Including Boeing" means that it will be 40x the cost and decades behind schedule.

    • @A86
      @A86 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since this is private, they won't be able to get away with that. This isn't government-funded.

  • @tra-viskaiser8737
    @tra-viskaiser8737 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Haven't actually built new glenn yet... but its doing really well in kerbal!!

  • @favesongslist
    @favesongslist ปีที่แล้ว +15

    My hope is pinned on Starship , with a 9m diameter and expendable version with over 1000 cubic meters of living space.
    IF Starship only ever works getting to orbit(booster reusable) and needing Dragon capsules for crew. it will make Orbital reef obsolete and a very expensive alternative.
    Hoping to see the first test flight and also a the test of SpaceX's new EVA suit tested by a dragon crew of 4 in space this summer.

    • @lunaticbz3594
      @lunaticbz3594 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If Starship can be made to work. It's really going to make so many concepts and ideas economically feasible.
      If we built a new ISS with the same funding it had the first time, but using Starship to launch it we could get quite the massive space station.

    • @theexchipmunk
      @theexchipmunk ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lunaticbz3594 There is an interesting calculation. If Starship manages to keep it´s extreamly low price estimate of 6-10 million per launch, recource extraction from asteroids of rare earth elements and precious metals like gold and platinum suddenly becomes viable. The reason is that the digging up, refining and cleaning and added trade prices are ridicoulus. To the degree that setting up space infrastructure suddenly becomes cheaper if you get a very affordable and capable launch vehicle. In addition of becoming independent of nations that have the mines, but are not necessarly politically favourable. So if Starship works out, we will likely see an explosion in space technology and infrastructure very quickly.

    • @lunaticbz3594
      @lunaticbz3594 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@theexchipmunk I personally have a lot of doubts about them achieving that price per launch. Would love to be wrong.
      But even if its 50 million per launch.. Still be the cheapest option by a wide margin, with way more capability then anything else.
      I can't wait till we start mining asteroids, really wish I was somehow in that business.

    • @favesongslist
      @favesongslist ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lunaticbz3594 Exactly. I tried to explain that to a leading scientist at ESA, That now is the time to consider what amazing payloads should be being looked into. They just did not believe a private company could do more that small payloads or space tourism :(
      An expendable Starship has an incredible 250 tonnes to LEO, think about what could be done without the cost of needing to make everything super lightweight.

    • @steveaustin2686
      @steveaustin2686 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lunaticbz3594 I agree. The recent comments by SpaceX's Gary Henry of $2000/kg now and possibly $200/kg for Starship, look to be internal SpaceX costs. Because the Falcon 9 B5 starting at $67M for 17.4 tons is $3,851/kg to the customer. So if Starship has the same profit margin on Starship, that puts a $200/kg internal Starship cost to $38M-$57M to the customer for 100-150 tons to LEO. Currently, NASA has the HLS Option B contract for $1.15B to get HLS to the Moon and if it takes 10 flights (GAO pg 27), then that is $115M per launch for the short term. Still very competitive.

  • @re1v3r
    @re1v3r ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Cortona, bring up Halo.

  • @TheConedera
    @TheConedera ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The beginning of the video showed a circular ship spinning in space - thus creating artificial gravity. This avoids all of the health problems associated with long-term micro gravity. In my opinion they won’t get it right until they actually design a space station - or ship to mars - with a rotating ring for gravity.

    • @ericblanchard5873
      @ericblanchard5873 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed

    • @steveaustin2686
      @steveaustin2686 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those kinds of stations are VERY heavy and have to be built in orbit. It's not like docking modules. Ring stations are likely not a near term solution.

  • @bassbone2010
    @bassbone2010 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Given the companies associated with this project and their past performances, I have no expectation that this will happen in the next 50 years.

  • @paulperano9236
    @paulperano9236 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Sounds very optimistic in both cost and time. However, if bold goals are not put in place nothing tends to happen. Better to extend the time lines than have it flounder on the table and never start.
    Elon may need something like the 'Reef' for Mars anyway. A staging platform to prepare for Mars launches. Then a similar staging platform at the Mars. Perhaps it will be more efficient to build and load large scale vehicles to move cargo between staging platforms and use smaller craft to ferry the cargo to the surface. "Teamsters in Sppaaccceee".

    • @stanj7223
      @stanj7223 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Elon already has something like Orbital Reef: Starship. It has more habitable volume than the ISS does, at a fraction of the cost. It's cheaper to leave a Starship in LEO and add the long-duration hab items to it than to build something else from scratch. Now all we need to do is launch Starship.

    • @keithscommunityanddomestic9513
      @keithscommunityanddomestic9513 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Elon can use the moon as a staging platform.

  • @jobvanwagner117
    @jobvanwagner117 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really enjoy your two channels. Thanks for what you do man. 😎

  • @miou118google
    @miou118google 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It took 100 billion, 10 years and 30 space flights from the Space Shuttle and Soyouz to complete the ISS.
    Orbital Reef sounds incredible as a space station but we have to keep in mind that it takes a tremendous amount of ressources to build this type of space project.

  • @andrewreynolds9371
    @andrewreynolds9371 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    $20 says Orbital Reef is never more than a 'power point presentation'.

  • @generalrendar7290
    @generalrendar7290 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I think that Blue Origin is the weak link in Orbital Reef. They keep losing top talent and their management structure is critically inflexible. Love Sierra Space though.

  • @mwilson49
    @mwilson49 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I sure wish Blue Origin would get something launched into LEO, at least, soon. then I would have more faith in efforts like the Orbital Reef. In any case, I hope it succeeds and wish them all the luck.

    • @thomashiggins9320
      @thomashiggins9320 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same, here.
      Hopefully, the Vulcan launches go well, and they learn enough to improve the engines even more, and that leads to successful test flights of the New Glenn, *sometime* next year.

  • @robvangessel3766
    @robvangessel3766 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A new goal for private competition should be development of artificial gravity systems.

  • @mrchapin94
    @mrchapin94 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really hope this design will be expandable where that center column could be expanded and more inflatable habitats could go in more people going to space and size those things would bring people's awareness to our community is better

  • @MrPsychopathy
    @MrPsychopathy ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How funny would it be if Sierra finished their development in time, and ended up partnering with Axiom with SpaceX for transport and finishing some other concept by 2030 while orbital reef gets delayed by 20 years due to blue origin?

    • @thomas.parnell7365
      @thomas.parnell7365 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like the dream chaser too will always be bit limited in payload capacity

  • @johnfry
    @johnfry ปีที่แล้ว +6

    New life goal: Make enough money to tour space in the first wave of tourists

    • @ericblanchard5873
      @ericblanchard5873 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good luck with that one, I'm just trying to fix my credit and save up for a Cybertruck.

    • @Embassy_of_Jupiter
      @Embassy_of_Jupiter ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah you be the guinea pig that helps find all the fatal design flaws so that my flight is safe, thanks in advance

  • @OH8STN
    @OH8STN ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Blue Origin hasn't even gotten into space yet. I wouldn't hold my breath.

  • @donaldclifford5763
    @donaldclifford5763 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm not too excited until I see a rotating station with centrifugal force simulated gravity.

  • @N0Charlie
    @N0Charlie ปีที่แล้ว

    Forget about Blue Origin... that feather is destined to be blown away

  • @keithscott1926
    @keithscott1926 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’m wondering why Sierra’s primary stage isn’t reusable? It could save them some money.

    • @ANathan123
      @ANathan123 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The only thing that sierra space makes is the actual space plane (dream chaser) they will use another company’s booster. It is apparently supposed to fit on multiple different rockets

    • @steveaustin2686
      @steveaustin2686 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ANathan123 Yeah, SNC says that the Dream Chaser is launcher agnostic and can fit on the Atlas-V, Vuclan Centaur, and Falcon 9. I'm not sure about the Antares 330 that Northrop Grumman is developing with Firefly Aerospace, but it should since it is planned to launch the Cygnus spacecraft for CRS missions.

  • @billthecat7536
    @billthecat7536 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    My bet would be if Elon likes this type of idea for SpaceX, he'd make it happen within a few short years. Starship, when fully operational, could carry the whole Reef in probably 2 launches. But knowing Elon, he'd think bigger and more functional for his own ''reef'' and it might take a few more launches. He could put the whole thing in orbit in about a month though once his fleet is built up some. ;-)

    • @earlpottinger671
      @earlpottinger671 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      And BO will try to sue claiming they invented the idea of space stations.

    • @A86
      @A86 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Elon has made a bunch of promises that have yet to come to fruition, were quietly dropped, or are behind schedule. Like Starship now being more than a year behind schedule. So, I'm not confident that he would pull it off in a few years.

    • @earlpottinger671
      @earlpottinger671 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@A86 Yet, Elon's Falcon 9 put satellites in orbit, it's crew dragon and cargo dragon makes deliveries to the ISS. I put more trust in Elon's promises than Jeff's BO that still has not even reach orbit. Also Jeff sues all the time instead of building rockets.

    • @tra-viskaiser8737
      @tra-viskaiser8737 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@earlpottinger671 yea I have to think elon has the base and funding abilities. He seems to be the most on the ball, and not willing to wait "just a few more decades" like everyone else seems to.. he feels the money and pioneer spirit. Just like the boer stock he is from.

    • @johngunderson5463
      @johngunderson5463 ปีที่แล้ว

      SpaceX is contracting to launch the first module of the Vast company Haven-1 space station in 2025, so they might be able to claim first commercial space station ahead of Axiom. Good news all around. Plenty of room for everybody.

  • @TimothyLipinski
    @TimothyLipinski 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video ! Orbital Reef should join or dock (mate) with Bigelow B330 Modules ! This will give more for NASA and/or tourists. This LEO Commercial Space Station (CSS) in the orbit of Apollo is a great location to launch for the return to the moon to stay. And this will have less cost than the SLS ! The Blue Origin Blue Moon can refuel on the moon from the Lunar Water Ice and return to LEO Commercial Space Station (CSS)) with a crew of four (4). The tech developed for the return to the moon to stay can take US to Mars and beyond-Ad Astra... T. Lipinski

  • @vk6xcj
    @vk6xcj ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I reckon it would be awesome , I thought by now we would have had big space station and a moon base as well ,,if I was loaded with money I would want to be a business partner in on the action just for the fun of it all... I hope it all happens in the next couple of years

  • @johnstewart579
    @johnstewart579 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I hope Orbital Reef takes orbit however Jeff Bezo's Blue Origin places a huge question mark on this project

  • @bozhijak
    @bozhijak ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude, Space IS hard. If humans had the characteristics of driver ants 'we' would have been to Mars and then some. Space rock = Colony. In reality we're just disorganized collections of grabassian
    ......... You get the point. Love the video and yea i agree this is going to be the way forward in LEO. Just have to deal with the "disorganized collections" part.

    • @richiexp2
      @richiexp2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you want to organise humanity, you'll need a government system like China.

    • @codename1176
      @codename1176 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richiexp2 you mean the system which had to steal most of its technologies.

  • @emmw7794
    @emmw7794 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Space X is realistically the only company that could get a Space Station in orbit by 2027, but they have other goals and projects going on with NASA and Space Force. LEt's see how far Blue Origin can get.

  • @mariusmeyer14
    @mariusmeyer14 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for sharing. There might be a easier if not cheaper way to create a space station. When Starship is fully functional they can launch a freighter version whith a Dodecahedron shaped docking node then in time 12 Crew rated Starships can dock to form a pincushion like space station. All SpaceX will have to do is to figure out how to get a docking port at the pointy end of a reusable Starship to make this a remarkable Space Station. Imagine, they can optimize each craft for different tasks like habitats, science labs and so on. The fact that it's reusable will enable them to bring them back for refit with more modern stuff. 😉

    • @coolHawk_
      @coolHawk_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Starship could carry the same amount of cargo as 5 space shuttle missions, and for way less cost. I think SpaceX will eventually make a starship docking station and use it for refueling. I could also see that station being helpful in the case of NASA’s nuclear propulsion craft that they’re saying can reach Mars in drastically less time. You’d then be able to keep that nuclear ship in orbit, have Starship dock to a station to refuel, maneuver to dock to the NASA ship, and that ship could ferry Starship to Mars in less time than Starship alone could do. It would be quite the operation, but it could happen

  • @John.S92
    @John.S92 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Eventually (we should hope) there will be rules demanding that the booster stages must be able to land again (SpaceX style), this would significantly decrease waste, and further garbage thrown into the ocens. (The oceans is where we get 99% of our oxygen from, so throwing garbage into the oceans is akin to what smoking does to your lungs)

  • @TheWadetube
    @TheWadetube ปีที่แล้ว

    With a better, more efficient booster engine we could put 1,000 tons in low earth orbit. Given that each launch at Space x with the 9 meter booster could put larger objects into orbit, each one dwarfing what came before and only cost between 20 and 30 million per launch. 3 launches could put up double or even triple the volume of the ISS and for a tiny fraction of the cost, less than 90 million.

  • @keithscommunityanddomestic9513
    @keithscommunityanddomestic9513 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The plan for this hinges on the need for business partners who want to do manufacturing and research and tourism in space. It will be interesting to see how that develops, but I think Elon's plan to colonize Mars is much more exciting. And the lunar lander that can be used to ferry people to the surface of the moon for short durations is a really exciting idea for space tourists.

  • @dirttdude
    @dirttdude ปีที่แล้ว

    whats the ladder for? climbing up and down?

  • @enamsatuu8988
    @enamsatuu8988 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Woow amazing....

  • @matthewschuchardt684
    @matthewschuchardt684 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just one more question, if they’re calling it an orbital reef, will it be possible to attach additional have modules onto each module

  • @hextoken
    @hextoken ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They really need to get some sort of gravity solution and radiation protection too.

  • @Aelipse
    @Aelipse ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot about the football field. Where else would the astronauts unwind than attending a zero gravity football championship?

  • @thorin1045
    @thorin1045 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice theory, the reality is that each seat on the crew dragon is 88 million usd, that is the price of that space commute you mention in the start. unless you intent to find solid gold bars, it is not worth the it, and after your first solid gold bar run, even solid gold bars will not worth anymore.
    we failed to find the spice in space, that worth risking entire ships and crew as it worth it weight in gold. We might do it for planting some flags and such, but beyond that, it is simply without reason. it is sad, that we have no real reason to go to space, beyond the 'explore' part, but actually no one did exploration for the sake of it.

  • @Chaotician69
    @Chaotician69 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I want so much for blue origin, Sierra space and Boeing to succeed but their collective innovative wheel moves entirely too slow. Boeing is heavily weighed down by bureaucracy, blue origins throws money at problems without any legitimate engineering solutions. Sierra is late in the game but has plenty of potential. I sincerely hope they all succeed. By they need to change how they do things and get out of an antiquated methodology of innovation and tech advancement. Let's go team ..... get it done by taking chances while maintaining safety.

  • @johnrudy9404
    @johnrudy9404 ปีที่แล้ว

    Someone mentioned the internet.
    That is precisely the way things will
    Develop. Robots, technology, advances in medicine, all of it.
    There will be a confluence of ideas and tech which will probably answer presently unknown questions. Once money is to be made in space, itll just become business as usual.

  • @liamerridge1935
    @liamerridge1935 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think if blue origin do not get going asap then space x will put the reef into space and service it when starship succeeds.

  • @mishkosimonovski23
    @mishkosimonovski23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Reef could be adjusted or expanded for tourist purposes. The first Space Hotel :)

  • @dmitrychernivetsky5876
    @dmitrychernivetsky5876 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dreamchaser looks suspiciously like Soviet's Spiral.
    China: "Let's build space station to do science"
    US: "Mr. Beast 10 ordinary people in space"

  • @steveaustin2686
    @steveaustin2686 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dream Chaser Tenacity was not the one doing the drop tests in 2017. It was an engineering test article that was dropped. Tenacity has not flown yet, as it is the first one built for orbit and plans to fly the demo CRS mission to the ISS in 2023, before the rest of the 6 mission CRS flights.

  • @andrewreynolds912
    @andrewreynolds912 ปีที่แล้ว

    It will be amazing to have a job in space without any training likr an astronoaut would need and that was something in sci fi now its something looking very possible

  • @ANathan123
    @ANathan123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dream chaser is meant for 7 people not 12. The habitat module can accommodate up to 12 people.

  • @CUBETechie
    @CUBETechie ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm curious if it can be made from wood too? I heard that there is an experiment going on its natural wood no clue but pins. It is made from cross laminated timber

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 ปีที่แล้ว

    Realy I like this video its so so interestyng

  • @lincolnrock9158
    @lincolnrock9158 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Space with never happen for everyone until antigravity tech finally comes out.

  • @wakamoli8248
    @wakamoli8248 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would think AI robotics would be a good way about this for construction.

  • @earth_ling
    @earth_ling ปีที่แล้ว

    Dream chaser about the size of a Chevy Suburban. How it is going to get anything up there is a mystery

  • @glike2
    @glike2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Instead of a linear station, make the pieces in a ring to allow some gravity from spin...

  • @andy84denham
    @andy84denham ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Without re-usability this wont be financial enough to go long term, the concept looks awesome though.

  • @toranhale7221
    @toranhale7221 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    On the timescale proposed, its a pipe dream. Sure, one day, but i dont see it happening until 2030 at the earliest.

  • @ericblanchard5873
    @ericblanchard5873 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They should make the orbital reef more like Deep Space 9.

  • @taith2
    @taith2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm still of an opinion that if we want to get serious on mass space deployment we need active support launch rails
    Bonus to this infrastructure is it doubles as energy storage and transmission over large distance
    Funny enough, building it is actually within NASA budget possibilities

  • @thomasdillon7761
    @thomasdillon7761 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Evil used his phallic rocket to penetrate the karman line. 🙏 Blue Origin. 🤣

  • @adamf3895
    @adamf3895 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The intro hits different!

  • @bjt81366
    @bjt81366 ปีที่แล้ว

    AI is going to impact the space race in ways that will be amazing. It will help cut costs and therefore ramp up timeframes as opposed to the current opposite.

  • @philiplongee1149
    @philiplongee1149 ปีที่แล้ว

    As I get closer to retirement (70+), Orbital Reef looks better and better.

  • @pduidesign
    @pduidesign ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Inflatable space labs???? Yeah, that’s going to work out well. (extreme sarcasm)

  • @MikeNapoli1989
    @MikeNapoli1989 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool 😎

  • @belgarion0013
    @belgarion0013 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great as usual!
    (ha ha especially at 10.50 =) )
    No seriously:
    Couldn't Spaceex do it significantly cheaper, since they can launch rockets significantly cheaper than the others combined?
    They have also talked about building a space station, so what happened with that?
    And with new construction modules and construction robots in space from Offworld Industries (former Gateway spaceport) we can have this up and running within four years (in mine and Elon time ;) )
    Why does everything take so long and cost so much?
    If everyone just gets together and agrees, this wouldn't be as impossible as it sounds..

  • @Rat-nl1xe
    @Rat-nl1xe ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how long do you think it will be before spaceX will have their own station

  • @ericblanchard5873
    @ericblanchard5873 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't think I would want to live in an inflatable habitat in space with space debris flying around up there.

  • @davidponseigo8811
    @davidponseigo8811 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm 50 years old and I know I will never visit space but all my life I have wanted to.

  • @riogrande5761
    @riogrande5761 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Blue Origin seems to be having trouble with success. Too bad SpaceX can't take over and get the job done. The inflatable habitat modules would make me nervous. Watching those tests where they over pressurize them and they explode is rather visually alarming.

  • @beringstraitrailway
    @beringstraitrailway ปีที่แล้ว

    Which company will the first one to build the first rotating space station?
    40 modest sized modules that are each 8 meters long would be enough to build a ring with a diameter of at least 100 meters.

  • @alexlabs4858
    @alexlabs4858 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh gosh lol blue origin….. we’ll have that space station by 2065…. Maybe.

  • @mariolis
    @mariolis ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the Axiom Station & Starlab projects?

  • @bsmusic2601
    @bsmusic2601 ปีที่แล้ว

    They should fit dream chaser on starship

  • @cn8299
    @cn8299 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is SpaceX considering building their own space station? I figured they wanted to since they'll have to eventually dock Starships out in space that aren't designed to re-enter Earth's atmosphere.

  • @kenjifox4264
    @kenjifox4264 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everything really hinges on having New Glenn, Vulcan, and Starship all flying operationally. Once those are reliably going to space any huge space station module can be sent up very quickly and cheaply.

  • @lucidmoses
    @lucidmoses ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If they have enough demand then go for it.

  • @anthonykevinkerr3594
    @anthonykevinkerr3594 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look at the companies involved - Blue Origin and Boeing. BO produces cgi presentation but little else. Boeing produces very late, very expensive and largely obsolete solutions. SpaceX is pushing ahead with developing orbital tankers which would be 9m diameter and could be used as a much bigger core sections.

  • @asgaiyawaya3973
    @asgaiyawaya3973 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The inflatable habs sound like the same idea behind submarines. Instead of an inner tube with an outer hall it's just the inflatable tube. If I am understanding this correctly.

  • @notgreg123
    @notgreg123 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Low Earth orbit is becoming more and more accessible

  • @IanCthrwd
    @IanCthrwd ปีที่แล้ว

    Time to get out of LEO. Go to GSO, sun synchronization orbits, tundra orbits, all 5 Libration points….50 years studying and working in Low Earth Orbit is getting a bit stale. Time to Step Up before that next Big Leap.

  • @keithcoppedge4441
    @keithcoppedge4441 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOL, Fight Club called it right. Space will be all about corporations!

  • @catman4859
    @catman4859 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are all cool. But what about space elevators? Carbon nanotubes and graphene are coming out. They are becoming much more cost efficient now. Please make a video about that.

  • @Peachcreekmedia
    @Peachcreekmedia ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If SpaceX was involved they could build this at Starbase quickly and efficiently.

    • @Mauricio_91
      @Mauricio_91 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I felt like he went out of his way to not mention Space X. Pretty awk.

  • @rfletch62
    @rfletch62 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not bad, Not B5 or DS9, but not bad. We're still on baby steps. All in good time.

  • @YunaOnHome
    @YunaOnHome ปีที่แล้ว

    Commercial space experiments will be more cost efficient. For example there’s no need to put humans into space just for experiments. A remotely controlled robot much like remote surgery is meant to be.

  • @KUSHxKiNG
    @KUSHxKiNG ปีที่แล้ว

    7:41 yeah the view of a meteorite coming at you will be overwhelming alright. I think their is a reason the ISS doesn’t have many windows lol. More glass means more areas where micro meteorites can penetrate and cause overwhelming damage 😂😂. Idk how advanced glass has gotten but I don’t see a glass panel stopping a projectile hurdling at 25,000 + MPH I just don’t see it happening. We have all seen the aluminum panel that got hit with a projectile and I’m not scientist but last time I checked glass isn’t aluminum or any thing close to the strength of metals.

  • @Goshin65
    @Goshin65 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm smelling a lotta IF coming off this plan... *crosses fingers*

  • @virtualmonk2072
    @virtualmonk2072 ปีที่แล้ว

    How many trips worth of rockets are they planning on dropping in the ocean? Soon you'll have to go to space to see a reef

  • @stompcity4085
    @stompcity4085 ปีที่แล้ว

    Starship booster…perfect size for modules…9 metres in diameter

  • @nuclear_AI
    @nuclear_AI ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can I request to be "ordinary person" no 2?
    Stranger things have happened in this simulation of ours 🤷‍♂️

  • @jonathanlivingston7358
    @jonathanlivingston7358 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why don’t we put those inflatable modules on starship going to mars?

    • @bowenmadden6122
      @bowenmadden6122 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      (Because Starship won't take people to Mars) >:P

  • @Whisper1177
    @Whisper1177 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm guessing if they truly want to start this project, they're gonna have to suck it up and ask nicely for Elon Musk to assist with these launches. He is the number 1 provider of crew and supplies to the iss currently. That and he's the cheapest.

  • @scivirus3563
    @scivirus3563 ปีที่แล้ว

    Blue Origin needs to put something in orbit first

  • @marktadlock5428
    @marktadlock5428 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are they testing for micro meteor strikes that can hit at speeds of 15kmph?

  • @EarthWatcher736
    @EarthWatcher736 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If this ever gets into orbit at least they will be able to get Chinese takeaways from the far bigger Chinese space station being planned.

  • @RooseveltCoopling
    @RooseveltCoopling ปีที่แล้ว

    8:27 if hydroponics can be grown in space, I wonder Ruderalis, Afeghanica, Indica, and Sativa....

  • @jorgesolis7891
    @jorgesolis7891 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ...suuure...., good luck with thia...

  • @adrianjanuary340
    @adrianjanuary340 ปีที่แล้ว

    The biggest problem with ORSS is that they have tied their fortunes to Blue Origins New Glenn which, because of many reasons, will not launch for another 10 years, if it launches at all.

  • @henrysantos121
    @henrysantos121 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Matatan.🤔. Ribirin HS, .🐎.
    👇
    What an amazing videos very well done,

  • @jeffreyknutson
    @jeffreyknutson ปีที่แล้ว

    This space station is not only still too small. Like its predecessor, it's already outdated. The idea of building another station with the same limitations as the ISS, would be a waste of money.
    The only space station worth building would be a revolving station like the one that Orbital Assembly plans to build called "Voyager". I am not saying that their idea is the best one, but at least their plan is to take advantage of allowing for gravity areas to be available for the main living areas and some work areas, and weightless areas for work and science. Their plan (as best I can remember) is to have a weightless center section that does not rotate, with two outer rotating rings. I think that the outer ring is supposed to have Earth's gravity, and the inner ring is supposed to have Mars's gravity.
    I do feel, however, that their scale needs to be modified a bit though. Don't get me wrong. That station would be huge, and easily visible from the Earth's surface, without a telescope!
    It should probably be a larger set of rings to make the spin effect not so bad. I should also insert here, that the station would be better if the center section was longer, with a second set of rings on the other side. This would also allow the ability to create a six-ringed station with the gravities of Earth, Moon, and Mars on both sides. This would allow people to acclimate easier life on each surface, and be better prepared for the lives they are heading towards.
    These large stations would truly be fully-functional, and 92% self-supporting stations. They would be large enough to support growth habitats to provide the occupants with fresh oxygen and plant-based foods. It would also give us a great model to further explore our solar system. We could build multiple stations that can have several ships dock onto the center sections. And the whole thing can be transported to their orbits around the moon, Mars, and beyond.
    When the people of the United States started spreading out across the west. It went from a trickle to a tsunami in a very short period of time. And our expansion out into our solar system is going to happen the same way. And the builders of that future need to prepare for it now.