Also, even if there isn't any proof that the standard model is complete it explain a lot of the fact that we have sperimentaly discover and vice versa; so as long as we don't find any better teory the standard model is optimal to use; it's like classic physic and relativity.
The standard model is just a map of the particle energy measurements. The only reason it isn't "fact" is because nothing in science is fact, only a compilation of evidence. Theories are always being tested and refined for precision and accuracy. The theory is not complete. It is self-consistent and makes successful predictions, but does not fully explain some things that it should.
Agree with everyone here, PBS Space Time is the best when it comes to astrophysics, QFT, the standard model, and Cosmology, Matt (host and writer) said in the patron video that the entire purpose of the show, is to share the bleeding edge of science with anyone who wants to learn it.
At 3:40 she says, “ it’s okay if your brains breaking at this point “ But to my surprise even though I’ve never studied any of this I completely followed everything she said. I couldn’t recite it back but I understood the concept as it was being laid out on front of me. It’s gotten me more excited in science 🙏🏻
For those who already know about the Standard Model, 4:04 is where the video starts. If you are really in a hurry, then no, there is nothing new at all. Just another composite particle.
This is one of the best introductions I've ever seen. My son (10yo) can grasp it. Thank you! I am interested in other simple breakdowns of "color charge" and "spin dynamics".
Joseph Fuller Fundamental particles have intrinsic properties that affect the way they behave in collisions with other particles! An example would be the electric charge of a particle. Electric charge can be either positive or negative, but quarks have a special intrinsic property that behaves very similarly to electric charge except that there are 3 states, so it doesn’t make sense to call them positive and negative. Additionally, observations of protons and neutrons show that the three quarks that make up that particle must have all three states of charge present. The quarks switch between the states in a complicated fashion, but all three states must be present for the proton or neutron to exist. The scientists who discovered these used an analogy of how mixing light of multiple colors creates white light. The white light represents stable hadron, while the colors which make that light represent the three different states of charge that quarks can take. Over time, the three different states became known as color charge, and a system for naming the different charges with a color has been adopted in much the same way that we refer to states of electric charge as positive or negative - for convenience in calculation and communication. This color charge is important for determining how these particles behave in collisions, because color charge must be conserved. For example, it can be deduced whether a particular outcome is possible by whether or not the conservation laws will be violated if that product were to be created. Spin Dynamics: Another fascinating intrinsic property of elementary particles is called spin. These objects are not actually spinning, they simply have an intrinsic property about them which behaves in many ways analogously to how a spinning object would behave when trying to apply a force to it, and the engineers at the time used this word and it stuck. Motion is only caused by a net force, and spinning objects resist changes to motion in a very different way than a stationary object does due to their angular momentum. It takes a good bit of research and practice to really grasp, but there are some great videos if you type “bicycle wheel angular momentum demonstration” and you can see what I mean. Basically, when studying electrons, engineers use electric and magnetic fields to probe their properties. The electric and magnetic fields apply forces onto the electrons which cause it to have motion. The motion of the electrons in response to these forces is very similar to the response of a spinning object being pushed on by a force, and so while they were trying to figure out what the intrinsic property truly was, they were using this spin analogy to communicate and calculate, and it has stuck. Basically what you should know about spin dynamics is that electrons have an intrinsic property about themselves which causes them to behave slightly differently in the presence of electromagnetic fields than would be expected just given their electric charge. Ex, given their charge, we expect one result, but experiments show very tiny (yet significant) deviations in results due to this intrinsic property called spin. Hope these explanations help! Basically, our experiments show that certain values are conserved before and after a collision. Conservation laws are one of the most useful tools in an engineers belt and we use them all the time to solve problems. Color charge and spin are the result of trying to find conservation laws that match experimental evidence of the subatomic particles.
@@MarenHunsberger Thank you for the reply to my comment. ^^ I often enjoy your videos more than other hosts on TH-cam as you have a very calming voice and usually a very clear style of presentation. There are only two other hosts that I think are better; the narrator of "Top 5s" and Jack Finch of "Top 5 Scary Videos" as they are simply the best!
@@cooper7655 A question for you that allways trubble me , given the fact that you know this things : Electrons are fundamental particles . The Weak Force is also fundamental . Now , the electron doesnt get to c because of the Weak Force via Higgs bosson or , The Weak Force is born from the fact that the electron has spin and charge . I guess my question is : Both are fundamental ( spin, charge ) / ( the weak force ) ....So , they are equally fundamental?? As we know , the electron doesnt exist ( not as a particle anyway ) .....So , that makes The Weak Force more true to the word Fundamental ??
Perhaps it is time to consider that the proton is always a pentaquark (five quarks) and not the traditional three quarks. It's quite possible that as accelerators become more powerful, that the increased energy separates the remaining two quarks (the quark and anti-quark pair cannot be detected until separated). Three quarks were detected for many years with lower energy collisions, but now we're likely to see a lot more pentaquarks in the future.
and thats why videos like this was created. to promote a false sense of intellect. its all bullshit. nobody knows anything, she even said it herself when she quoted Richard Feynman. all propaganda hype to get people buying into this "cult" of science that essentially brainwashes people into "bro culture", bro
@Milan S all talk, all empty claims, zero backing. just a coward response with no actual substance other than an attempt to discredit. Facts > bullshit
I think einstein and robert penrose are thinking that gravity doesn't have a particle because its not a force but a consequence of the geometry of space-time expanding
Luper ionic Yeah like isn’t kinda obvious that the curvature of spacetime (aka gravity) is a consequence of the sum of large numbers of baryons and their corresponding bosons?
@@keylanoslokj1806 "Derp, I don't understand it so it's pseudoscience derp-de-derp". Be an idiot if you really feel that you must, but don't make your idiocy public.
@@keylanoslokj1806 Money is one thing various governments have unlimited amount of since they print it. Its the other physical resources that are limited. We persue science to learn to better harness the resources of the universe.
This channel is so so good and what an amazing, simple communication by the presenter! I was watching this 'PBS SpaceTime' channel and gosh looking at them I realize how good your channel is! Thank you.
First: Maren's shirt has me expecting to see a coyote chasing a roadrunner showing up in the video Second: This would be a good topic for an extended podcast
The title is clickbait. It implies there is a new subatomic particle and that the standard model is changing. Neither of these things are true. The topic is interesting, why do you need to frame it around a lie? Why is this a thing?
Both of these things are true, this pentaquark is new and it is subatomic. It's also exploring unknown behaviors of standard model thus shifting our understanding of it. But what you probably read from it is that there is new *elementary* particle, which there is not and that standard model is turned on it's head, which its not.
i zoned out for a second and it sounded like i was listening to a comics video. talking bout strong force, weak force, electromagnetic force, speed force and gravitational force
Wouldn't it make more since that Gravity is caused by the interaction between dark and regular matter? the same way the electromagnetic force, except on a much larger scale and "weaker"or "slower" version of matter? Like the spirals that form we see when particles collide, but not strong enough to pull apart, or trigger radiation/decay of regular matter? Just seems to me that dark matter defiantly seems to have a "pooling" force on on atomic matter, kinda like a "gravity"would, lol.
Talk more about pentaquark, in particular: 1. How do they know it was made of five (5) quarks? 2. In what way *could* it shift the standard model? I know it was recently discovered, so that needs to be researched, but give an example of how a previous particle shifted the standard model, perhaps one of the exotic hadrons. Maybe explain how things shifted once they looked into 4 quark hadrons. Just to whet our curiosity about future research. 3. What was the lifetime of the pentaquark, compared to other exotic hadrons? Does that give some clue as to what new discoveries are to be found? 4. Under what conditions did the the pentaquark form? I don't know what are the relevant parameters, but I am guessing: temperature, particle energy, magnetic field density and how it compares to the formation of other particles. That can give us an idea of how difficult and rare it is to produce such an exotic hadron. BTW, bravo on the overview of the standard model as we know it now.
It’s an attribute of quarks like electric charge which can be either red, green or blue, and accordingly antiparticles are anti-red, anti-green or anti-blue (but it has nothing to do with actual visual colours, the naming is all just convention that sort of gives us an analogous way of understanding it). The net colour of something made of quarks must be neutral, which is accomplished by either having e.g. a red quark and an anti-red quark in the case of mesons, or by having one of each colour, red, green and blue like in the case of baryons. Gluons also have colour charge, but for them it is never neutral, they carry net colour.
Aviv Shlevin color charge is held by quarks and glouns. It is the thing that keeps quarks together and is essentially the strong force. It is like the electromagnetic charge, but with color charge. It is important to note that there isn’t any actual colors flying around, it is just a useful name to describe the phenomena, like how we call a strange quark a strange quark.
I, for one, would LOVE to see more on charge and "color charge." How does it differ from normal charge? Is it "partial charge"? Are units of "charge" divisible? If positive and negative charge are "indivisible", how exactly does three-way charge work? Are the "color charges" just fractions of the same charge protons and electrons have? How does math explain 2 up + 1 down vs 2 down + 1 up quark having +1 vs 0 charge (2x + y = 1, x + 2y = 0)? Since electrons are not made up of quarks, do some quarks even have a non-positive charge? All questions I'd LOVE LOVE LOVE a detailed explanation on, because quark-charge is the most confusing part of subatomic particles to me.
Here from the future just to let you know that our completed Theory of Everything includes a fourth pairing of Quarks. It took a much larger collider constructed around the lunar equator to find it, and was suitably dubbed: The Shy Quark It's properties are too complex to go into here, but it created so many problems with existing theory a new theory was required. This new theory unified all four fundamental forces in all four dimensions acting on all four pairs of fundamental Quarks. Only snag was that there was no counterpart to the newly discovered Shy Quark. The new theory suggested its properties would be in opposition to the Shy Quark, not as anti-matter, but as traits. So the search for what was dubbed the Extrovert Quark began, only to be abandoned after twenty years of fruitless experiments when a Japanese physicist made a drastic revision to the Expanded Standard Model which organised everything according to a mathematical group called E8 where, in vastly oversimplified terms, 8 = 4 + 4 including the anti-particle versions of the four Quark pairs in higher dimensions that protrude into our own 4 dimensions extremely briefly, except in controlled laboratory conditions, as anti-matter is prone to annihilate matter, an inequality between them leaving a small amount of remainder we call matter (however if there was more anti-matter then the remaining anti-matter would be so common, we would still call it matter). This new theory added a fourth category, controversially called "Thought", to the long familiar set of three: Quark, Force, and Dimension. This wasn't really anything to do with Thought, any more than some Quarks have anything to do with Charm. It was a synthetic metamodel that reified the many-worlds interpretation of QED which had attempted to reconcile popular thought experiments involving cats where a conscious observer witnesses a definitive state as being a scheme where multiple observers witness every probabilistic outcome in their own disjoint parallel universes. The Japanese physicist circumvented the non-uniqueness problem this model introduced by framing in other terms in a metamodel he called Thought. This allowed the mathematics to only concern itself with one physical reality, with four dimensions, four fundamental forces, four material quark pairs, and four modes of "thought". A lot of physicists at the time could not justify adding this new category to theory as it was unobserved, and experimentally unobservable by definition as consciousness can not be deconstructed experimentally to be interrogated in its role vis-a-vis a Schrodinger style experiment, and the Japanese researcher's addition was mocked as being a "wart". Ten years later, In a paradigm shifting revelation, it was experimentally proven that the long sought after Extrovert Quark that was mysteriously unfindable despite having expected traits of being the exact opposite of the Shy Quark was identified as being the already discovered extraordinarily prevalent Neutrino. Putting the TOE into practical applications led to innovations such as force field technology formed by tweaking the spin of Neutrinos to turn them into connected stable lattices of Shy Quarks held together by the Strong Nuclear Force. This solved the then energy crisis as it made the long sought after Fusion Reactor containment a net win, when previous magnetic bottles had always consumed more power than the Fusion Reaction produced. Quantum Entanglement was also used to develop instantaneous communication at any distance, when combined with this new insight into fundamental particles and their relationship to force and dimension and after a further thirty years, teleportation further eliminated legacy Carbon pollution through a technology where fields could be entangled so that walking through one would reconstruct energy across the gap as if both sides of the doorway were coterminous. Finally it was discovered that this instantaneous travel over any distance could also go back in time. Allowing me to write this comment on your quaint "TH-cam app". Word of advice. Sell all NFTs and BTC ahead of 2024. Buy Gold instead.
I still don't quite understand how the photon carries the electromagnetic force when electricity, for instance, is the flow of electrons - a different particle?
I think Feynman rolls over in his grave every time someone quotes him as say: “If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics." Firstly it’s not clear if he ever in fact even said this. Murray Gell-Mann and Niels Bohr both predecessors of Feynman are known to have made similar quips. Niels Bohr having said; “Hvis man kan sætte sig ind i kvantemekanik uden at blive svimmel, har man ikke forstået noget af det” (which roughly translates: "If you can get acquainted with quantum mechanics without becoming dizzy, you have not understood anything of it ” Assuming Feynman did say it (it kind of sounds like him) he certainly didn’t mean what is so often implied by those who quote him; Almost always used in a context that suggests Quantum Mechanics is inherently mysterious, not within the grasp of mere mortals or fundamentally incomprehensible.
lol These Particles are only particles at a single instant in time...Like a snapshot ....and by the way the Feynmen quote was "Anyone who Claims to Understand Quantum Physics is either Lying or Crazy"
@@giovannip8600 you can't prove it, mostly because Niels Bohr said it first -- and in Danish -- so nitpicking over the English wording of how Feyman may or may not have repeated itF is pretty silly. Feyman did once say (in a book) "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics."
Yes there is a shift in particle mass composition., an error in creation that was rectified. The previous standard model was causing a collapse in structure due to a remainder left over after stellar formation. I could go on and on with the details but I'll keep it abridged. The left over charged particles were building up and leading to the event which causes black hole formations inevitably leading to a total collapse of all matter. This was rectified by altering the pathway of initial stellar reactions and redistributing them to create a support structure within the newly formed particles thus expanding the excess particle charge.
YUSS, please make videos on the Color Charge and Spin Dynamics please!!! Learning physics in one's free time has never been as easy and entertaining as with your videos!!! :D
The gold standard of theoretical physics is quantum field theory (QFT). Feynman shared the 1965 Nobel Prize for helping discover the QFT for electromagnetism. Glashow-Salaam-Weinberg shared the 1979 Nobel for discovering the QFT that explains the weak interaction. Gross and Wilczek shared the 2004 Nobel for discovering the QFT that explains the strong interaction. There have been a number of attempts to come up with a QFT for gravitation. To date, they have all been deemed failures.
There is one mistake I have figured out while you were describing the standard model and thats about the way of classification of the particles.. Hadrons and leptons are the two types, not quarks and leptons.. because leptons are also made up of quarks( quark and a antiquark) . Anyway the video is a fantastic one, loved the presentation, and greatly got curious about the exotic hadrons..
Given that the photon acts as both an attractive/repulsive force between particles with charge AND resists their acceleration through the opposing magnetic field created when *charges* accelerate... ...could the Higgs Boson double as a graviton, since mass (like electric charge) has gravity as an attractive force AND has momentum that resists the acceleration of *masses* that the higgs boson is supposed explain?
I still remembered the day a substitute philosophy professor told me "quarks are a dated theory" to put weight on his claim that modern physics didn't know enough about the fundamental nature of matter! Nonetheless, I put more trust into the SM than GR why? contrary to mere observations (which causes are not yet fully understood) the SM is backed by decades of experimental and theoretical developments.
The Higgs field does not give all particles their mass. The Higgs field gives the electron some mass which prevents it from moving at the speed of light, but the mass of protons and neutrons is attributed to the strong nuclear force as well as interactions in the gluon field.
Maren, you have a gift for being pleasant, and for explaining difficult subjects in an understandable way. You are likely inspiring many people. Good job!
I didn't learn anything from this that I couldn't already tell by the name "pentaquark." How many ups, downs, stranges, charms, tops, or, bottoms, does it have? How does this fit into or alter our understanding of quantum chromodynamics?
In leptons you said about ghost particles with no mass and charge. If it has no mass or charge how do you tell them as the ghost of their respective particles ?
*Starts to explain the standard model from the beginning*
Ah shit, here we go again
Hate these people to talk about standard model as a fact.
@@Majlo2L8 They referred to it as a "widely accepted scientific theory," which is an accurate description 1
Also, even if there isn't any proof that the standard model is complete it explain a lot of the fact that we have sperimentaly discover and vice versa; so as long as we don't find any better teory the standard model is optimal to use; it's like classic physic and relativity.
The standard model is just a map of the particle energy measurements. The only reason it isn't "fact" is because nothing in science is fact, only a compilation of evidence. Theories are always being tested and refined for precision and accuracy.
The theory is not complete. It is self-consistent and makes successful predictions, but does not fully explain some things that it should.
I feel you.. its painful to watch her struggle this much.. go get hank.. or someone actually trying to explain stuff
I wanted more... like 23 minutes more of this... it felt like a warm-up...
that's seeker for you
23 minutes? dude I wish I could have a fuckin IV drip of this shit directly into my brain 24/7. Break our brains, Seeker. Break our brains so hard.
You want more?
Then head over to PBS Space Time.
It'll make this seem like a grade school primer.
Agree with everyone here, PBS Space Time is the best when it comes to astrophysics, QFT, the standard model, and Cosmology, Matt (host and writer) said in the patron video that the entire purpose of the show, is to share the bleeding edge of science with anyone who wants to learn it.
@@bigdickpornsuperstar pbs spacetime
Makes my brain collapse into a black hole
Which is awesome
Please talk more about this subject
Yes, but try not to sound like you're asking questions when you talk? Because it makes you sound less serious? It's distracting?
@@motox2416what?
At 3:40 she says,
“ it’s okay if your brains breaking at this point “
But to my surprise even though I’ve never studied any of this I completely followed everything she said. I couldn’t recite it back but I understood the concept as it was being laid out on front of me. It’s gotten me more excited in science 🙏🏻
What's her name?
Absolutely
@@hapyness
Maren Hunsberger
Some times I pretend to understand everything
SOMETIMES I PRETEND TO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING AT ALL.
@@theadventuresofbrockinthai4325 NASA wants to know your location
Most wasted billions of dollars ever. Complete pseudoscience funneling.
@@user-jc6ov7jv8t THAILAND
@@theadventuresofbrockinthai4325 on the way
For those who already know about the Standard Model, 4:04 is where the video starts.
If you are really in a hurry, then no, there is nothing new at all. Just another composite particle.
Thanks for the TL:DR! 😀
AHAHAHHA lov u
i agree, there's no "shift" in the standard model I can tell
I just made exactly the same point.
The first half of the video about the Standard Model basically summarised what I learned about particle physics last year
Cool story bro
This is one of the best introductions I've ever seen. My son (10yo) can grasp it. Thank you!
I am interested in other simple breakdowns of "color charge" and "spin dynamics".
Joseph Fuller so glad you liked it!!! That was the goal :)
Joseph Fuller
Fundamental particles have intrinsic properties that affect the way they behave in collisions with other particles! An example would be the electric charge of a particle. Electric charge can be either positive or negative, but quarks have a special intrinsic property that behaves very similarly to electric charge except that there are 3 states, so it doesn’t make sense to call them positive and negative.
Additionally, observations of protons and neutrons show that the three quarks that make up that particle must have all three states of charge present. The quarks switch between the states in a complicated fashion, but all three states must be present for the proton or neutron to exist.
The scientists who discovered these used an analogy of how mixing light of multiple colors creates white light. The white light represents stable hadron, while the colors which make that light represent the three different states of charge that quarks can take. Over time, the three different states became known as color charge, and a system for naming the different charges with a color has been adopted in much the same way that we refer to states of electric charge as positive or negative - for convenience in calculation and communication.
This color charge is important for determining how these particles behave in collisions, because color charge must be conserved. For example, it can be deduced whether a particular outcome is possible by whether or not the conservation laws will be violated if that product were to be created.
Spin Dynamics:
Another fascinating intrinsic property of elementary particles is called spin. These objects are not actually spinning, they simply have an intrinsic property about them which behaves in many ways analogously to how a spinning object would behave when trying to apply a force to it, and the engineers at the time used this word and it stuck. Motion is only caused by a net force, and spinning objects resist changes to motion in a very different way than a stationary object does due to their angular momentum. It takes a good bit of research and practice to really grasp, but there are some great videos if you type “bicycle wheel angular momentum demonstration” and you can see what I mean. Basically, when studying electrons, engineers use electric and magnetic fields to probe their properties. The electric and magnetic fields apply forces onto the electrons which cause it to have motion. The motion of the electrons in response to these forces is very similar to the response of a spinning object being pushed on by a force, and so while they were trying to figure out what the intrinsic property truly was, they were using this spin analogy to communicate and calculate, and it has stuck. Basically what you should know about spin dynamics is that electrons have an intrinsic property about themselves which causes them to behave slightly differently in the presence of electromagnetic fields than would be expected just given their electric charge. Ex, given their charge, we expect one result, but experiments show very tiny (yet significant) deviations in results due to this intrinsic property called spin.
Hope these explanations help! Basically, our experiments show that certain values are conserved before and after a collision. Conservation laws are one of the most useful tools in an engineers belt and we use them all the time to solve problems. Color charge and spin are the result of trying to find conservation laws that match experimental evidence of the subatomic particles.
@@MarenHunsberger Thank you for the reply to my comment. ^^ I often enjoy your videos more than other hosts on TH-cam as you have a very calming voice and usually a very clear style of presentation. There are only two other hosts that I think are better; the narrator of "Top 5s" and Jack Finch of "Top 5 Scary Videos" as they are simply the best!
@@cooper7655 Wow, thank you for the info. It is a bit dense, but I will give it a closer read on the 'morrow.
@@cooper7655 A question for you that allways trubble me , given the fact that you know this things :
Electrons are fundamental particles . The Weak Force is also fundamental . Now , the electron doesnt get to c because of the Weak Force via Higgs bosson or , The Weak Force is born from the fact that the electron has spin and charge .
I guess my question is : Both are fundamental ( spin, charge ) / ( the weak force ) ....So , they are equally fundamental?? As we know , the electron doesnt exist ( not as a particle anyway ) .....So , that makes The Weak Force more true to the word Fundamental ??
I build the tallest lego tower.
My little sister smashes it!
I say: What are you doing?!?!?
She says: Looking for the elemental building blocks.
HAAA LOL...well played lol
thomasfholland Ha Ha Ha ha
Maybe she was just upset that you had all the legos. I only say this because I think I may have done the exact thing to my brother.
Really enjoy this new-ish host. She's a really good communicator :)
@@CrazyKingJammy lol
@@CrazyKingJammy I actually appreciate her enunciation, she's literally a good speaker.
@@CrazyKingJammy let me guess Da eArF iS fLaT like your head....
@@leroy420b sorry. wrong guess., how does your bullshit taste? or is it a suppository?
At least she's cute
Perhaps it is time to consider that the proton is always a pentaquark (five quarks) and not the traditional three quarks. It's quite possible that as accelerators become more powerful, that the increased energy separates the remaining two quarks (the quark and anti-quark pair cannot be detected until separated). Three quarks were detected for many years with lower energy collisions, but now we're likely to see a lot more pentaquarks in the future.
Wow i need start school from zero again
Well good luck ! Even after you realise it's weider
In my experience, most people do.
Seems like very few paid attention the first time through.
Or just watch porn and let others figure it out.
Just watching this makes me feel intelligent.
Yeah! ARMY'S here
Most wasted billions of dollars ever. Complete pseudoscience funneling.
@@keylanoslokj1806 are you serious?
and thats why videos like this was created. to promote a false sense of intellect. its all bullshit. nobody knows anything, she even said it herself when she quoted Richard Feynman.
all propaganda hype to get people buying into this "cult" of science that essentially brainwashes people into "bro culture", bro
@Milan S all talk, all empty claims, zero backing. just a coward response with no actual substance other than an attempt to discredit.
Facts > bullshit
I really want to know about.. Color charge... Please make a video on that
i think this one of the best simple explanations ive heard. great job!
I think einstein and robert penrose are thinking that gravity doesn't have a particle because its not a force but a consequence of the geometry of space-time expanding
Luper ionic Yeah like isn’t kinda obvious that the curvature of spacetime (aka gravity) is a consequence of the sum of large numbers of baryons and their corresponding bosons?
@Plasma Matter Oh, no black holes? So the recent photographs are a NASA plot?
Give me a break.
Plasma Matter nobody is saying that we don’t believe in Tesla’s work lmao. The guy was a genius but didn’t read The Prince by Machiavelli
@Plasma Matter wow what a fine anti Semitic comment you've made it would be sad if it was reported....
Gravity controls the flow of time
Another great video from Maren, very well presented and I look forward to showing this to my high school students next week.
How many thumbs-up can we get for a science teacher who teaches cutting-edge science?
Most wasted billions of dollars ever. Complete pseudoscience funneling.
Man I wish my teacher would of showed me this while I was in school I love seeker you should also check out Exurb1a
@@keylanoslokj1806 "Derp, I don't understand it so it's pseudoscience derp-de-derp".
Be an idiot if you really feel that you must, but don't make your idiocy public.
@@keylanoslokj1806 Money is one thing various governments have unlimited amount of since they print it. Its the other physical resources that are limited. We persue science to learn to better harness the resources of the universe.
Yeah I would like to know more about quantum world.
There is only one world.
This channel is so so good and what an amazing, simple communication by the presenter! I was watching this 'PBS SpaceTime' channel and gosh looking at them I realize how good your channel is! Thank you.
Did you know that wrong word order can get you banned from PBS SpaceTime?
2019: insert particles here
2999: epsilions, phions, iotons, gammons, betons, deltons.... etc
That was a crash course that anyone that has basic knowledge would find very informative and interesting!! Good job!
First: Maren's shirt has me expecting to see a coyote chasing a roadrunner showing up in the video
Second: This would be a good topic for an extended podcast
You are a fantastic presenter, one of my favourites on TH-cam, friendly yet informative, great job
Particle accelerator: **exists**
The flash cosplayer: "hold my suit"
The title is clickbait. It implies there is a new subatomic particle and that the standard model is changing. Neither of these things are true. The topic is interesting, why do you need to frame it around a lie? Why is this a thing?
Pc(4312)
its called marketing. and... this whole thing is the Most wasted billions of dollars ever. Complete pseudoscience funneling.
Both of these things are true, this pentaquark is new and it is subatomic. It's also exploring unknown behaviors of standard model thus shifting our understanding of it.
But what you probably read from it is that there is new *elementary* particle, which there is not and that standard model is turned on it's head, which its not.
It’s a TH-cam science reporting channel, they don’t really understand what’s going on they just like to report it.
Click Bait says hello
i zoned out for a second and it sounded like i was listening to a comics video.
talking bout strong force, weak force, electromagnetic force, speed force and gravitational force
I can't avoid thinking about DS9 every time quark is mentioned.
Wouldn't it make more since that Gravity is caused by the interaction between dark and regular matter? the same way the electromagnetic force, except on a much larger scale and "weaker"or "slower" version of matter? Like the spirals that form we see when particles collide, but not strong enough to pull apart, or trigger radiation/decay of regular matter? Just seems to me that dark matter defiantly seems to have a "pooling" force on on atomic matter, kinda like a "gravity"would, lol.
Please go deeper into quantum mechanics. I absolutely love quantum mechanics and subatomic physics. Id love to learn more
Watch prof. susskinds lectures on particle physics
Ill take a look at that. Thanks for the sugestion
"All forces except gravity have a carrier particle" what about the gravitons. We don't know whether they exist yet.
Regardless of whether or not it exists, the graviton is not part of the standard model because we can't fit it in without breaking everything.
@@rzezzy1 thanks!
Very clear explanation of the standard model. Keep the work up!
very clear explanation of a bullshit ignorant model. yup. Keep up the work!
Talk more about pentaquark, in particular:
1. How do they know it was made of five (5) quarks?
2. In what way *could* it shift the standard model? I know it was recently discovered, so that needs to be researched, but give an example of how a previous particle shifted the standard model, perhaps one of the exotic hadrons. Maybe explain how things shifted once they looked into 4 quark hadrons. Just to whet our curiosity about future research.
3. What was the lifetime of the pentaquark, compared to other exotic hadrons? Does that give some clue as to what new discoveries are to be found?
4. Under what conditions did the the pentaquark form? I don't know what are the relevant parameters, but I am guessing: temperature, particle energy, magnetic field density and how it compares to the formation of other particles. That can give us an idea of how difficult and rare it is to produce such an exotic hadron.
BTW, bravo on the overview of the standard model as we know it now.
This is a good piece of A Level Physics revision material XD
20th may😩
I like the way video started from basics then moved to main topic
You didn't tell us which 5 quarks make up the new particle...
One of your best videos as of yet. Well explained and paced 👌
color charge? please explain
It’s an attribute of quarks like electric charge which can be either red, green or blue, and accordingly antiparticles are anti-red, anti-green or anti-blue (but it has nothing to do with actual visual colours, the naming is all just convention that sort of gives us an analogous way of understanding it). The net colour of something made of quarks must be neutral, which is accomplished by either having e.g. a red quark and an anti-red quark in the case of mesons, or by having one of each colour, red, green and blue like in the case of baryons. Gluons also have colour charge, but for them it is never neutral, they carry net colour.
Aviv Shlevin color charge is held by quarks and glouns.
It is the thing that keeps quarks together and is essentially the strong force.
It is like the electromagnetic charge, but with color charge.
It is important to note that there isn’t any actual colors flying around, it is just a useful name to describe the phenomena, like how we call a strange quark a strange quark.
@@Elliot_97 thanks
I, for one, would LOVE to see more on charge and "color charge." How does it differ from normal charge? Is it "partial charge"? Are units of "charge" divisible? If positive and negative charge are "indivisible", how exactly does three-way charge work? Are the "color charges" just fractions of the same charge protons and electrons have? How does math explain 2 up + 1 down vs 2 down + 1 up quark having +1 vs 0 charge (2x + y = 1, x + 2y = 0)? Since electrons are not made up of quarks, do some quarks even have a non-positive charge?
All questions I'd LOVE LOVE LOVE a detailed explanation on, because quark-charge is the most confusing part of subatomic particles to me.
I loved the video
Yes please more Quantum mechanic videos
Could you explain that again but using interpretive dance?
Thanks - I needed a good laugh :)
4:44 SEE I ALWAYS BELIEVED THAT THE TRIFORCE IS THE ORIGIN OF UNIVERSE (Baryons)
Here from the future just to let you know that our completed Theory of Everything includes a fourth pairing of Quarks.
It took a much larger collider constructed around the lunar equator to find it, and was suitably dubbed:
The Shy Quark
It's properties are too complex to go into here, but it created so many problems with existing theory a new theory was required.
This new theory unified all four fundamental forces in all four dimensions acting on all four pairs of fundamental Quarks.
Only snag was that there was no counterpart to the newly discovered Shy Quark.
The new theory suggested its properties would be in opposition to the Shy Quark, not as anti-matter, but as traits. So the search for what was dubbed the Extrovert Quark began, only to be abandoned after twenty years of fruitless experiments when a Japanese physicist made a drastic revision to the Expanded Standard Model which organised everything according to a mathematical group called E8 where, in vastly oversimplified terms, 8 = 4 + 4 including the anti-particle versions of the four Quark pairs in higher dimensions that protrude into our own 4 dimensions extremely briefly, except in controlled laboratory conditions, as anti-matter is prone to annihilate matter, an inequality between them leaving a small amount of remainder we call matter (however if there was more anti-matter then the remaining anti-matter would be so common, we would still call it matter). This new theory added a fourth category, controversially called "Thought", to the long familiar set of three: Quark, Force, and Dimension. This wasn't really anything to do with Thought, any more than some Quarks have anything to do with Charm. It was a synthetic metamodel that reified the many-worlds interpretation of QED which had attempted to reconcile popular thought experiments involving cats where a conscious observer witnesses a definitive state as being a scheme where multiple observers witness every probabilistic outcome in their own disjoint parallel universes. The Japanese physicist circumvented the non-uniqueness problem this model introduced by framing in other terms in a metamodel he called Thought. This allowed the mathematics to only concern itself with one physical reality, with four dimensions, four fundamental forces, four material quark pairs, and four modes of "thought".
A lot of physicists at the time could not justify adding this new category to theory as it was unobserved, and experimentally unobservable by definition as consciousness can not be deconstructed experimentally to be interrogated in its role vis-a-vis a Schrodinger style experiment, and the Japanese researcher's addition was mocked as being a "wart".
Ten years later, In a paradigm shifting revelation, it was experimentally proven that the long sought after Extrovert Quark that was mysteriously unfindable despite having expected traits of being the exact opposite of the Shy Quark was identified as being the already discovered extraordinarily prevalent Neutrino.
Putting the TOE into practical applications led to innovations such as force field technology formed by tweaking the spin of Neutrinos to turn them into connected stable lattices of Shy Quarks held together by the Strong Nuclear Force. This solved the then energy crisis as it made the long sought after Fusion Reactor containment a net win, when previous magnetic bottles had always consumed more power than the Fusion Reaction produced. Quantum Entanglement was also used to develop instantaneous communication at any distance, when combined with this new insight into fundamental particles and their relationship to force and dimension and after a further thirty years, teleportation further eliminated legacy Carbon pollution through a technology where fields could be entangled so that walking through one would reconstruct energy across the gap as if both sides of the doorway were coterminous. Finally it was discovered that this instantaneous travel over any distance could also go back in time. Allowing me to write this comment on your quaint "TH-cam app".
Word of advice.
Sell all NFTs and BTC ahead of 2024. Buy Gold instead.
Wait, "truth" and "beauty"? Am I the only one seeing this? 🤔
Yeah, this is the first time I've heard this.
@@Anthony-cn8ll, a strange notion, but quite charming!
I remember learning about those back in the 1980's, so they've been around for a while
*seeker uploads video*
My brain: aah shit here we go again
I think you should add time like; 10min.
Yes make a series on particle physics!
Today's fact: Rowan Atkinson, also known as Mr. Bean, is the voice of Zazu in The Lion King.
Huh.. I never knew that :o
Seems obvious now I'm listening to it
why is that relevant in any way to quantum physics?
@@terminate5888 they're both random
If you think you understand Rowan Atkinson, you don't understand Rowan Atkinson.
I just love this channel. How much I learned and the all the feelings because of them a lot. Big thank you for all effort.
what about the speed force?
Good to see you in Specs)) Btw the topics are as usually, really interesting)) but it doesn’t mean that I understood everything!))))
3:40 : "It's totally fine if your brain is breaking at this point."
No it's not fine, lol, what the hell. Call an ambulance, Jesus.
I still don't quite understand how the photon carries the electromagnetic force when electricity, for instance, is the flow of electrons - a different particle?
6 minutes about the standard model,
1 minute about the main topic of the video..
Color Charge? Spin Dynamics? Yes, let's talk about it!
This chick is great. Clear, articulate and lovely.
I think Feynman rolls over in his grave every time someone quotes him as say: “If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics." Firstly it’s not clear if he ever in fact even said this. Murray Gell-Mann and Niels Bohr both predecessors of Feynman are known to have made similar quips. Niels Bohr having said; “Hvis man kan sætte sig ind i kvantemekanik uden at blive svimmel, har man ikke forstået noget af det” (which roughly translates: "If you can get acquainted with quantum mechanics without becoming dizzy, you have not understood anything of it ” Assuming Feynman did say it (it kind of sounds like him) he certainly didn’t mean what is so often implied by those who quote him; Almost always used in a context that suggests Quantum Mechanics is inherently mysterious, not within the grasp of mere mortals or fundamentally incomprehensible.
I like to nod while I smoke my pipe, pretending to follow ANY of this
LMFAO! 😂 🤣 😅
Armchair scientists would do this. 👍
I'm Interested in finding the graviton as are many others. So many doors can be opened by such a discovery.
*more videos like this please!* 👍🏻🧔🏻
@@earlaweese th-cam.com/channels/XWkeMlGHxQpNjqJM1m2bJg.html ✌🏻🧔🏻♥️
3:41 "it's totally fine if your brain is breaking at this point"
my brain broke once I clicked this video 🤣😂
lol These Particles are only particles at a single instant in time...Like a snapshot ....and by the way the Feynmen quote was "Anyone who Claims to Understand Quantum Physics is either Lying or Crazy"
How do you prove it (the quote)?
@@giovannip8600 you can't prove it, mostly because Niels Bohr said it first -- and in Danish -- so nitpicking over the English wording of how Feyman may or may not have repeated itF is pretty silly. Feyman did once say (in a book) "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics."
@@KutuluMike they're very different translations, one must be "truer"
I love your videos, you do such a good job communicating complicated information. Thank you!
The standard model is flat.
Existential Euphoria she has some tities
xovux is 13 years old
Do you know what makes me interested in it?? IT HAS CURVES!!
Ban knowledge.
The universe is flat.
*_Super amazing background behind your illustrator_*
**insert funny joke cause im early**
What did the neutron say to the proton?
What up quark?
Great presentation Maren more please!
Yes there is a shift in particle mass composition., an error in creation that was rectified. The previous standard model was causing a collapse in structure due to a remainder left over after stellar formation. I could go on and on with the details but I'll keep it abridged. The left over charged particles were building up and leading to the event which causes black hole formations inevitably leading to a total collapse of all matter. This was rectified by altering the pathway of initial stellar reactions and redistributing them to create a support structure within the newly formed particles thus expanding the excess particle charge.
Colour charge, spin dynamics sounds like a wonderful topic of a video.
YUSS, please make videos on the Color Charge and Spin Dynamics please!!! Learning physics in one's free time has never been as easy and entertaining as with your videos!!! :D
The gold standard of theoretical physics is quantum field theory (QFT). Feynman shared the 1965 Nobel Prize for helping discover the QFT for electromagnetism. Glashow-Salaam-Weinberg shared the 1979 Nobel for discovering the QFT that explains the weak interaction. Gross and Wilczek shared the 2004 Nobel for discovering the QFT that explains the strong interaction. There have been a number of attempts to come up with a QFT for gravitation. To date, they have all been deemed failures.
There is one mistake I have figured out while you were describing the standard model and thats about the way of classification of the particles.. Hadrons and leptons are the two types, not quarks and leptons.. because leptons are also made up of quarks( quark and a antiquark) .
Anyway the video is a fantastic one, loved the presentation, and greatly got curious about the exotic hadrons..
What’s up with the head movements this video?
Given that the photon acts as both an attractive/repulsive force between particles with charge AND resists their acceleration through the opposing magnetic field created when *charges* accelerate...
...could the Higgs Boson double as a graviton, since mass (like electric charge) has gravity as an attractive force AND has momentum that resists the acceleration of *masses* that the higgs boson is supposed explain?
I didn't know I had any understanding of quantum physics that could be broken... until now. Ah, the relief to have an understanding 😊
So clearly explained. This is what a well-organised video should look like.
Color theory and spin dynamics pleaase🙆🏾♂️🙆🏾♂️🙆🏾♂️🙆🏾♂️
YES QUANTUM CROMODYNAMICS
QCD please
But @maren_heisenberg why we dont get any news about changes in our fundamental. such in our school educations .....?
I still remembered the day a substitute philosophy professor told me "quarks are a dated theory" to put weight on his claim that modern physics didn't know enough about the fundamental nature of matter! Nonetheless, I put more trust into the SM than GR why? contrary to mere observations (which causes are not yet fully understood) the SM is backed by decades of experimental and theoretical developments.
can titan gel be used for what?
*HELP*
what is her name?
Please tell me...
DIM ROAST
Mia Khalifa
any good links on how the study of this particles is helping in the developing of sources of unlimited energy ?
The Higgs field does not give all particles their mass. The Higgs field gives the electron some mass which prevents it from moving at the speed of light, but the mass of protons and neutrons is attributed to the strong nuclear force as well as interactions in the gluon field.
How about an update on the "ghost" particle that was discovered on October 31st of 2018?
It would be awesome to have a episode dedicated to explain the weak force in depth
I somehow get an eerie feeling we will never cease to find out new stuff in the universe.
Yes, more QM and particle physics videos
Meanwhile in more advanced civilization, standard model diagram contains more items than our periodic table
Nope. It contains fewer. An advanced civilization will simplify this model, not complicate it.
Really great and short, compressed intro into standard model!
Maren, you have a gift for being pleasant, and for explaining difficult subjects in an understandable way. You are likely inspiring many people. Good job!
I didn't learn anything from this that I couldn't already tell by the name "pentaquark."
How many ups, downs, stranges, charms, tops, or, bottoms, does it have? How does this fit into or alter our understanding of quantum chromodynamics?
Please do more videos like this! I love quantum physics
yes, I'm interested whats color charge?
This is a great explanation of the Standard Model
Great video, very well organized, and elegantly narrated.
In leptons you said about ghost particles with no mass and charge. If it has no mass or charge how do you tell them as the ghost of their respective particles ?
I don't ever want to stop learning about this stuff
Tell us about cold fushion next .
Maren, you are a fantastic communicator. I look forward to each new video of yours. :-)
Please do this fundamental particles episodes in Seeker+