Hello sir, very interesting video. However, I'm a bit confused. I believe that you fundamentally misused Newton's Third Law in your explanation of the additional amount of lift generated by the vortices at high angles of attack. As you rightfully said, the vortices' air comes from the wing's underside around its leading edge and then back down to apply a *downward* force on the wing's upper surface. By Newton's Third Law, there must be, as you again rightfully said, an equal and opposite (upward) force, but this force is applied (upward) *on the vortex air*, *not* the wing. Lift is an upward force applied on the wing, not on the air above the wing. In other words, the vortex air pushes downward on the wing, and the wing pushes upward on the air. That is the only way the Third Law can work. Otherwise, if your explanation was correct, putting a heavy object on a table would lift the table upward... which is obviously the opposite of what we observe. Maybe I misinterpreted your words? I believe instead that the downward acceleration of the air simply causes a large pressure drop above the wing, creating the additional lift.
Thanks for the informative video. And adding humor when you overshot the first landing was very amusing
Ah Just came across this while looking for a few videos to help my friends with it a tiny bit more, lovely job showing both and how not to land haha
I have bought the Concorde today and its awesome !
Thanks Florian. Keep the tutorials coming!
Good explanations , Thanks
Thank you very much, hope to see more of this tutorials! You made us an awesome bird!
What is your advise for where the simulator throttle handles should be when the A/T is disengaged?
Thank you. Considering of buying this… Is it very difficult to master? I had the FS Labs' Concorde in FSX, and I found it quite difficult…
You didn't crashed with this vertical speed when touching the ground???
Could you please make video about how to make a flight plan/waypoint list or how to flight ILS? thanks!
Hi, how can you hold the altitude during the flare?thank you
I hope you will improve the flight engineer panel which at this time is far from being accurate! I could be interested!
Cheers
Panel works fine!
Why did you not used the FD on the landing?
Concorde doesn’t really require FD, hence it’s an aircraft from the 60s-70s
can you dump fuel?
TreeTG nope
not for now...
Hello sir, very interesting video. However, I'm a bit confused. I believe that you fundamentally misused Newton's Third Law in your explanation of the additional amount of lift generated by the vortices at high angles of attack. As you rightfully said, the vortices' air comes from the wing's underside around its leading edge and then back down to apply a *downward* force on the wing's upper surface. By Newton's Third Law, there must be, as you again rightfully said, an equal and opposite (upward) force, but this force is applied (upward) *on the vortex air*, *not* the wing. Lift is an upward force applied on the wing, not on the air above the wing.
In other words, the vortex air pushes downward on the wing, and the wing pushes upward on the air. That is the only way the Third Law can work. Otherwise, if your explanation was correct, putting a heavy object on a table would lift the table upward... which is obviously the opposite of what we observe.
Maybe I misinterpreted your words?
I believe instead that the downward acceleration of the air simply causes a large pressure drop above the wing, creating the additional lift.
Now I don’t feel so bad whenever I bounce it haha.