Lmao you still pedalling this crap brand 😂😂😂 high quality my ass! Watching any video that's not paid by them and tests the quality will tell you these are garbage and sound like shit.
I think one problem is that while baseball was building gems in the 90’s, architects didn’t really have a solid idea what a good football only stadium would look like, so many were built utilitarian.
@@westsparks6844that's bait bro, such a terrible idea lmfao 😂
18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1
Every league in North America has the one venue from days of old that'll never die. For MLB, it's Wrigley (NL) and Fenway (AL). NHL and NBA have Madison Square Garden. The NFL has Lambeau.
You darn right Lambeau will never be replaced, it's the Fenway/Wrigley/MSG/Churchill Downs of the NFL! Every league needs at least 1 venue that's old but charming/legendary. Lambeau is that! We take great pride in taking care of it, and are hosting the 2025 NFL draft with it! Ftr, Lambeau Field technically isn't the oldest stadium currently in use in the NFL (Soldier Field is), it's the oldest CONTINUOUSLY used stadium since Soldier field and War Memorial in Buffalo wouldn't host their NFL teams for a few more years, the Bills played in War Memorial in 1960, while the Bears finally played at Soldier Field in 1971. No other NFL team has stayed in their home longer than us!
@@fpjrzman that's why I kinda count MSG for both NBA/NHL as it's the oldest venue for both leagues. Saddledome is supposed to be replaced soon, and I wouldn't be surprised if Anaheim replaces the pond soon as that was built in 1993.
As a person that ran track at Oregon. All the cool ass stadiums for the ducks are on the other side of the Willamette river. But Historic Hayward will never ever be torn down 😤
@frenchfrey65 Hate to say it but Penn Station is putting savage pressure on NYC to demolish Madison Square Garden so They can expand their train service
@@HIITisHARD I think the Giants are going to be back in New York State by 2038-2040. As it looks like NJSEA is supposed to be dissolved by then. I think the Giants are going to end up in Weschester County, specifically in Yonkers. I think the Jets will probably end up on Long Island somewhere.
@grantandersen luckily, the stadium was privately funded by both teams, instead of taxpayers footing the bill to pay over $1 billion to get built and be disappointed for wasting that amount for a modern NFL stadium that looks stale, generic, and unattractive.
As a Washington fan, I would rather go to MetLife. Fed Ex field is a dumpster. Should get Waste Management to sponsor it. Location sucks and the stadium is a functioning toilet bowl. Never again will I waste a dime going to a game there.
Arrowhead is fine. Spruce it up a bit and call it a day. It's got fairly pretty lines and is easily accessible to most of the city with ample, if expensive, parking(in a city that is very car-centric). That being said, they'll still overcomplicate it and overspend, crippling public coffers further. Oh well.
M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, MD, is a quality stadium consistently updated by the Ravens in partnership with the MD Stadium Authority. The stadium is located downtown, adjacent to mass transit, and major attractions (Inner Harbor, Horseshoe Casino, ...). What other cities build, Baltimore has grown into.
Both M&T as well as Camden Yards are going to stand the test of time because of the location, the fact that they are both in good shape, and both are going to build more things around their stadiums. The O's renovations haven't started yet, but once they kick in, that complex is going to be cooler than ever.
The Superdome is not fucking allowed to go away. Like you said, it has survived too much. It's a symbol of goddamn unkillability at this point. I'd be pissed off if they replaced it in my lifetime.
@@boogitybear2283 Hell yeah! I'm not even from the area, but to me? The Superdome is THE place to see football. There's a reason it has hosted so many Super Bowls.
Arrowhead should begin to fall into the category of Lambeau. It is iconic. It's very design funnels noise to the field (which is against the rules with new designs). If the Chiefs move, that whole "loudest stadium in the NFL" thing goes away. Look up the video of John Elway whining because it's too loud in Arrowhead. That is a legit piece of homefield advantage being taken away if they tear down Arrowhead. The Hunts would be stupid to do that. Plus, they have more money than ever now and they should fund the renovations themselves.
Waste of tax payer money. Some of these teams could sell out 120,000 seats every game. that’s the only reason a team should be asking for a new stadium Is to meet demand for more seats. And stop asking for tax payer money for renovations
@@therock238360It's because SF passed a law. If a stadium gets built or renovated with taxpayers $$ the stadium can't have a corporate name. So that's why SF stadiums are privately founded. I also think they get property tax breaks too if they don't take the people's money.
There are other reasons. A big reason for the Highmark replacement is some structural deficiencies in the upper deck. Engineers working for the state, not the team, estimated that the stadium would need to be replaced or rebuilt in the 2030s due to deterioration of the rebar in the concrete due to freeze thaw and vibration. That's a big reason for the stadium issue in Buffalo finally getting traction with politicians after 20 years of the team asking. Sure, they could rebuild the existing building. But the argument more or less came down to do we pay 1.5 to rebuild what we have, or pay 1.8 for a building with nicer amenities.... Or 3 for a dome.
Yea but what do u want the federal govt to mandate no city can provide incentives? In America that eoukd be called communism and i doubt the supreme court would even allow that. An NFL team does bring in tax revenue and most NFL owners could put their investment in the NFL into an index fund and make more money off of it. Not saying I care about the owners at all, i dont. I do care about what an nfl team means to a city. Govt could also force nfl teams to allow the cities to buy the team then they get all the profit if the owners refuse to pay to build stadiums but again, even a liberal court would be 50/50 on allowing that law to stand given the implications. Like I could see this the supreme court allowing the govt to take over sports but it would be over some made up transgender scare, def not doing it in a way that benefits the people of a city over a billionaire owner. So prolly better cities just negotiate for the best deal possible to get the team and not be afraid to let the team leave cuz in most cases they will get another team at a decent deal since there is a market.
Heinz Field (I’ll never call it that new name, screw that) has always been perfect for the Steelers. The only thing they did wrong was close up the open end, that was a significant home field advantage. But it has great sight lines, not even the nosebleed seats are bad, the open steel framework is very Pittsburgh, and the grass field itself is something the players love. It doesn’t need to be replaced. It’s not like Pittsburgh will ever host a Super Bowl. Replacing Three Rivers had to happen. Replacing Heinz Field does not.
This goes well in tandem with Tree's vid The Great Stadium Grift. You'd really want to get at least 40 years for something that could be a long term debt for the city.
That's the NFL ownership's first play, hold a city hostage, threat to leave, unless the city passes a tax bill to help pay for a stadium. Of course each stadium is different, some are owned by the team owner, some owned by the city or county, so it can get complicated. But ultimately, it's BS to tax (which means you just take the money) versus lets say an investment. I would be more prone to give money to a local stadium rebuild if I knew I was going to get a return on my investment. But they'd rather just take the money and use it and reap the benefits themselves.
I thought I read rumors the Broncos are already wanting to do something with the New Mile High Stadium, which is barely over 25 years old. I remember seeing it get built, so it's insane to think these expensive monstrosities have such a short life span. In fact, it feels like a conspiracy of architects and construction firms to make sure they can get billion dollar contracts! Those bastards!
As an architect, if there were that kind of money to be had in these public projects, I'd be living a lot better than a 1br apartment... For a lot of these, it's lack of maintainence or desire for new amenities or technological advancement. Being a bills fan, I'll use Highmark as a good example. The stadium was built in 73 and wasn't made for the large electronics of today. It wasn't until the last renovation that it was able to even support the ribbon video boards and modern broadcast infrastructure in a meaningful way. A big reason the Bills didn't have prime time games for 20 years, aside from the drought and bad teams, was that there wasn't a way to hook up the sky cam in the stadium that all the prime time games used. Now, a big reason for the replacement is that the exposed concrete structure of the upper deck is suffering damage from exposure and vibration. And it became a question of, do we keep slapping billion dollar bandaids on the building every 10 years, or spend 2 billion and have a building you don't have to touch for 30 years outside technology and finishes. As for a building like FedEx. It was built by the lowest bidder, it was built with exposed structure. And it's ownership put absolutely 0 effort into upkeep so it's falling apart. Compared to Baltimore which took care of their building of the same era. And I can say, aside from some faded plastic on the seats, that building still looks pretty good
I love soldier field, if the bears were smart ( ha, what a funny), they would of bought the stadium, tear down the interior, rebuild to the original specs, copy michigan stadium, and keep it simple. Wow sounds like i'm smarter than my hometown team
@@msarzo yeah it's not hard to do. use michigan stadium as a template, have the bowl below ground level with the iconic exterior rebuilt to its '98 facade and add in modern features. it's not hard to understand but chicago gonna chicago
I agree,but when I comes to watching games live at soldier field I love it .I feel your real close to the field.but all the technology and all the bells and whistle s it sevely lacks no doubt
What makes you think the Bears are going to spend a penny to build their own stadium? They're trying to gouge the taxpayer just like every other professional sports team? As if the Bears are going to spend a billion dollars of their own pocket get real
Got to give Seattle credit... both their MLB and NFL stadiums were built in the late 90's, and despite being 25 years old no one there has even remotely considered replacing or renovating either one. They've done a great job maintaining both, and both feel fresh and new even today.
I’ve been to Commanders Field and the site of RFK in the last 7 months. Both need to be leveled the former as it completely sucks and the latter as it’s really dilapidated. Would be great to build a new one on the site…
Raymond James Stadium hosted a Super Bowl in 2021, as well as WrestleMania, and 2016 wasn’t exactly forever to host the College Football Playoff. I’d expect gradual renovations over any full blown replacement. You’ll notice the Tampa Bay Rays are building a new ballpark right next to their old one in a location no one except St. Petersburg people seem to like. Why? Hillsborough County/Tampa wasn’t in the mood to put up the public funding St. Pete and Pinellas County are willing to. Hopefully, their development supplies fans, because they’re on the hook!
Bank of America Stadium has been looooooong overdue for a replacement. Sucks that us Panthers fans will probably have to wait 20 years before we get a suitable replacement. As for that upcoming renovation, it's nothing but a band-aid placed on a festering wound.
If you want to replacement Stadium go to your bank withdraw $20,000 and give it to the team. Tell thousands of your fellow fans to also give the team $20,000. Then you'll get your Stadium without having to gouge the taxpayers like I know you think you're about to do. Screw off use your own money.
Honestly I just don't care about the team anymore, and I probably feel apathetic toward the league as a whole. Maybe it's burnout from following last season much more than college, which proved to be a mistake after the playoffs we got. (I am definitely excited for CFB this season more with the expanded playoff)
Paycor/Paul Brown Stadium was built with grade Z concrete. I was there for the first NFL game, a preseason game. It look so amazing, but as I was walking I saw cracks in the concrete everywhere. Our tickets were in the lower bowl, 8 rowes up on the 40. Excellent seats, but chunks of concrete were already falling off the thing! It is easily one of the biggest construction scams in NFL history. With the costs of replacement of concrete, etc., the stadium cost taxpayers about 1 billion dollars.
Nothing like people with a net worth north of several billion dollars holding the middle class hostage to build them stadiums to make them even more money.
@@ironfox4990 no arrowhead looks brutalist in some places.. retro classic means like lambeau field. that concrete style has always looked ugly. i think a mix of M&T and lambeau would be retro classic
I actually hope the NFL dosent make any new stadiums after ones that are already being built because you won’t get weather games which is a spirit of football that historic people in the NFL like John Madden loved. I know that some stadiums have opening domes but they don’t typically open them unless it’s good weather and most of the concepts for the new stadiums don’t seem to include this feature
It’s literally one of the worst stadiums in the nfl. Just like dodgers stadium, just because it’s iconic doesn’t mean it isn’t a total dump. It’s so bad compared to any of the modern nfl stadiums. And it’s not like Lambeau which is a timeless classic. Arrowhead is as antiquated as the coliseum was, and if chiefs fans remain in denial about this and hold up renovations I’m sure the hunts will have no problems relocating the team. This isn’t college football. The nfl doesn’t care about tradition and history. If you don’t have an ultramodern world class stadium that’s beautiful to look at you’re already behind. That place is an eyesore from the inside and out, no different from the dump the panthers play at.
@@georgehenan853 that a fucking lie. The stadium is no where near one of the worst stadiums in the league. Nothing about the stadium is in disrepair. And it wasn't that long ago it was renovated. I bet you're from KS talking down about Chiefs' fans not being excited fund two brand new stadiums in KCMO. Not every stadium needs to look like it should be on the Vegas strip.
@@StuntzMcKenzy2D this is the nfl. Stadiums shouldn’t be ugly eyesores. Arrowhead is hideous from the outside. Looks like a stadium from the 60’s or 70’s. Because it is. It’s a dump. Stop being so defensive about it.
@@georgehenan853 "don't be defensive while I'm being defensive." You said something deal with it. Once again you sound like you're from Kansas or you don't pay bills. Because you're not acknowledging what comes with giving the Chiefs and the Royals both new stadiums in a city that is already complaining about how high rent and/or property taxes already are. You speak as if money isn't a finite resource in an economically shakey period of time.
I guarantee that the Jets and Giants will abandon the monstrosity known as MetLife stadium and New Jersey altogether so the Jets can build it in either Brooklyn (Williamsburg-Greenpoint), Queens (either Long island city, Flushing, or Jamaica: when Aqueduct Racetrack closes for good), Nassau, or Suffolk county, while the Giants can build it in either the Bronx, Westchester (next to Yonkers Raceway or Rockland county by 2040 and the Meadowlands stadium will be replaced with real affordable housing, retail/restaurants and entertainment as well
What do you mean the Jets can build their stadium? You mean the Jets will try to gouge a community to build the stadium for them. Any City that builds the stadium for an NFL team have been played for fools
In fact I think that’s gonna happen. I got some friends who are close with the Giants, in NJ who tell me that once MetLife expires, NJ is going to be done with both teams by 2038-2040, seeing as by that year NJSEA, is set to dissolve. They’ve also told me that by 2035 the Giants are planning to move their Headquarters and Training Facility up to Weschester County most likely, White Plains. And their next Stadium will most likely be in Yonkers.
@@grantandersen I concur to that and the Jets (once the major corporation in New York City buys the franchise from the Johnson family) will sell the Training facility in Florham Park to the highest bidder and construct their new facility in either Maspeth (stadium would be built in Williamsburg-Greenpoint) Queens (Sunnyside Yard, Flushing or Jamaica) either way it's a winner for both sides
@@metsandjetsfan5174 The reason why Weschester County makes the most sense for the Giants is because the Mara’s and the Tisches are from and live there. The front office actually kinda operates out of Weschester already.
I don’t Heinz Field is going anywhere anytime soon. It’s still in pretty good condition and let’s be honest, the city won’t help pay for a billion dollar stadium. If anything I eventually see them moving their practice facility and front office to a more modern facility located outside of the city to make it more attractive to free agents but that’s about it.
I hate to tell you, but Ford Field sucks! Nobody can fit in the seats, it's way too cramped, and you can't view shit from the upper deck. Went there for a few lions games and a TSO concert and could barely see anything. It may not be the worst stadium, but it definitely needs to be replaced...and soon. Maybe if the lions win the Superbowl this year
Owners should have to pay for 100% of the stadiums they build instead of burdening the tax payers every time they want to get into a junk measuring contest with their fellow scumbag rich people.
If you ask ownership.. the stadiums are obsolete by the end of their 3rd season (if that long).. they are never happy with what they have. Nice attitude when it's not YOUR money building it. I sitll say, make them build it themselves. That's why Lambeau is still around. Team owned.. team maintained.
I truthfully don't think the superdome will ever be replaced. I was born in New Orleans and that stadium is a beacon of hope in the city. The Louisiana historic landmarks guidelines states that the "Building has to be 50 years old and also retain enough of its original architectural design and materials to properly reflect its reason for and period of significance." So by the time that superbowl rolls around there will probably be work to have it designated as a landmark. If they don't get the ball rolling by then, I will.
How in the world is the NFL allowing the commanders to continue playing another down in that building? I would be furious if I was a fan. Y’all deserve better.
I don't understand Miami's Hard Rock Stadium, being the 5th smallest. I wonder why they haven't gone bigger if they host the Super Bowl as often as they do?
I go from stadium for work. Of the stadiums I’ve been to the only one I felt needed to be replaced was KC. It looks like a great place to watch a game but underneath it was designed poorly. I don’t see how it can be fixed. The best option is probably to replace. Here’s the thing… if they are going to replace it with a stadium designed by someone that has no idea what they are doing they should probably just save the money and keep playing in the stadium they have. For any city looking to replace a stadium my advice would be don’t make it harder than it needs to be. Just call the builder and tell them to build you Cowboys Stadium. Of all of the stadiums I’ve been to it’s the best by a bunch.
I was in Cleveland for Summerslam and stayed near Brooklyn Park. It's only a 15-20 minute drive to downtown. Plus there's plenty of public transit to get from there to the city.
Nah, it gets renovated pretty often and has a massive entertainment pavilion. Plus it’s 100% owned by the Kraft family so there is no risk of them losing it.
The Arrowhead renderings you posted after the Kansas stadium are out of order. The renovation renderings were "before" the vote that was rejected in April. Therefore the images you posted about a renovation are in fact what was turned down. The Kansas stadium proposal is the last thing on the board for the Chiefs as of this time. So the team is not "Leaning toward renovations. In fact if you dive deep into the bellows of this vote and the proposals, this vote for renovations was set up to fail so the Chiefs and Royals can get new stadiums outside of KCMO.
10:18 Yinzers, including me, just had a heart attack not only because Acrisure Stadium was on the list but also because you spelled PITTSBURGH as PITTSBURG
It’s a total dump. Stop being in denial. It’s no different from dodgers stadium. Just because it’s iconic doesn’t mean it isn’t severely outdated. Both are objectively godawful stadiums towards the bottom of their leagues. Chiefs fans need to stop lying to themselves. That stadium is a total dump in the bottom tier of stadiums now that places like the coliseum have been replaced.
Okay so as much as I love arrowhead, which I FUCKING LOVE ARROWHEAD. It does need to be updated. But never replaced. Look what the Packers were able to do. I don’t see why Arrowhead can’t get the same treatment. Unlike Highmarks supposed cold advantage, Arrowheads noise is an actual advantage. And it get pretty cold here too lol. Never replace. Just renovate.
@@georgehenan853Bro that’s not the point. A lot of us don’t care about shiny new stadiums. It’s a waste of money first of all and secondly I go to Arrowhead to watch football not explore a stadium. If something has to be done with Arrowhead it should be renovation. Look at Lambeau. They were able to save a historic stadium and make it livable for the casuals and spouses.
@@stormageddon248 Lambeau is a much nicer well designed stadium. But it’s more like a nice college football stadium. Arrowhead is terrible. And yes, we do like nice shiny stadiums, this is the nfl. If you care about tradition and history, and the football itself you watch college football. The nfl is about money, appearances, social media clicks, and financial viability. And arrowhead fails in all of them.
Before I even watch I doubt NRG will be on here, that stadium has awesome views all over it for football games and concerts plus it’s got that big ass screen if you don’t wanna look down
I don't think taxpayers should be on the hook for "ANY" money to build a stadium. Let the billion dollar league finance and pay for their playing arenas. Last time I went to a football game, I guess it was only 1 game, tickets were like $60 per and then I had to buy a 6pack of beer to get a single cup and buy a full pack of ball park franks to get one dog. It was NOT a family friendly outing what so ever. So ... I choose to not go, if you choose to go great, but I shouldn't have to subsidize the cost of your entertainment. I'm all about subsidizing the cost of things which has a necessity to them like roads and public schools, but your entertainment doesn't even make the top 10 million of things. If I have to pay to revamp roads / traffic around said venue well that falls into a necessity and ... I suppose (lol). If a football stadium wants to defray the costs .... then partner with the local baseball team, a huge concert promoter, something else that can bring in the people and the $$'s .... or go ahead charge $100's per ticket and make the fans support the TRUE cost of their entertainment.
Agreed 100%. I'm sick and tired of these backyard sport playing people getting paid a lot more money than teachers all the while receiving taxpayer funding. NFL = rigged anyway and therefore shouldn't receive a penny!
If these leach owners literally just had 1 good design and spent their money on the field, they wouldn’t have to use the venue as a selling point. Case in point, Arizona/Phoenix Coyotes.
@@BobbyDazzler28 - Yep. Just can't play football outside anymore. Lot of fans cry about it too. Clearly it's becoming a thing of the past and nothing we can do about it unfortunately. At least in college we'll still have outdoor games and actual places that resemble a sports stadium from the outside.
In Philadelphia, there was once a stadium called Veterans Stadium, aka The Vet, which was home to both The Philadelphia Eagles, and The Philadelphia Phillies. It served both teams for 33 years. It was replaced by two stadiums, Lincoln Financial Field, aka The Linc, for The Eagles, and Citizens Bank Park, for The Phillies. The Linc is now more than 20 years old, and Citizens Bank is now almost 20 years old, and, amazingly, so far, there is no talk of replacing either stadium. I remember, when The Vet was imploded over 20 years ago, one fan of The Vet, who remembered that stadium from when it was brand new, was so heartbroken, that he said that he would probably be crying every night for the next 33 years after the implosion.
The Caesar's Superdome is ranked #39, while Smoothie King Center is above it in #36. However, the Commander's Field is dead last at # 90. Yes, this is coming from Sports illustrated's list.
I love this channel, I’ve never been to the US but it’s wild to think that a stadium built 50 years ago is classed as ‘old’… In the UK that’s still relatively new 😅
If the browns stadium turns out to be a success 2 out of the 3 AFC north teams will follow suite. Pitt may keep theirs simply because where the hell would you build a replacement?
Baltimore isn't going to follow suit either. If you consider that the Ravens renovation project is designed to make M&T Bank Stadium a much more modern place from the outside even though it has been open since 1998. The Blackwing suites they added this year and the underground stadium clubs on each side that they are adding next year, plus wider concourses are proof of it. Not to mention there's literally nowhere else you could build a new structure because Horseshoe and Top Golf are already there, plus there's Oriole Park at Camden Yards which is also going to receive major renovations in the next year.
Go to buyraycon.com/fivepoints for 20-40% off sitewide on Raycon products! Brought to you by Raycon
Lmao you still pedalling this crap brand 😂😂😂 high quality my ass! Watching any video that's not paid by them and tests the quality will tell you these are garbage and sound like shit.
You in the gym is so gay😂😂😂😂
Gay❤❤❤
Affordable my butt. The Occlaim i bought on Amazon are half the price of the cheapest Raycons, and sound great
I think one problem is that while baseball was building gems in the 90’s, architects didn’t really have a solid idea what a good football only stadium would look like, so many were built utilitarian.
If they looked across they pond, they would've had a better idea.
That's funny because it took nearly half a century for some teams to get out of a baseball stadium.
@@jbj7599why? They aren’t any better than nfl stadiums of the era
The bigger issue IMO is that in building NFL stadiums capacity and aesthetics are polar opposites
@@jbj7599 nah, euro stadiums blow. You're talking about stadiums that are at the very least a tier lower grade.
Oakland Colosseum: “No place will ever be worse than me.”
FedEx Field: “Hold my sewage and watch this!”
Don't worry, they're under new managementship
Tropicana: Know I'm baseball but nothin beats me
Maybe fedex
All 3 are bad: oakland alameda, tropicana & commanders field
Ew, Poo water!
I can imagine Urinating Tree had a heart attack when you called it Acrisure Stadium.
Stillers gahna call it Heinz Field….and gahna shuper bowl!
@@matthewfranke9988😂
It's Heniz Field, and it will always be Heniz Field
8:42 At this point, FedEx/Commanders Field has no reason to exist. Tropicana Field of the NFL.
Thank god Tropicana field is about to cease to exist
I’d say it’s closer the the Oakland Coliseum
@@jmoney5350 but the new stadium is some how still going to be bad
have you ever been to Fedex? we had plenty of sellout games last year
@@panam4redd I was referring to the stadium’s lack of charm
New stadiums overwhelmingly funded by taxpayers for billionaire owners.
Lambeau Field built in the 50s in the NFL's smallest market, still standing.
Lambeau should build a new indoor stadium.
@@westsparks6844that's bait bro, such a terrible idea lmfao 😂
Every league in North America has the one venue from days of old that'll never die. For MLB, it's Wrigley (NL) and Fenway (AL). NHL and NBA have Madison Square Garden. The NFL has Lambeau.
Raymond James Stadium has been in use for over a quarter century, just like your mom
You darn right Lambeau will never be replaced, it's the Fenway/Wrigley/MSG/Churchill Downs of the NFL! Every league needs at least 1 venue that's old but charming/legendary. Lambeau is that! We take great pride in taking care of it, and are hosting the 2025 NFL draft with it!
Ftr, Lambeau Field technically isn't the oldest stadium currently in use in the NFL (Soldier Field is), it's the oldest CONTINUOUSLY used stadium since Soldier field and War Memorial in Buffalo wouldn't host their NFL teams for a few more years, the Bills played in War Memorial in 1960, while the Bears finally played at Soldier Field in 1971. No other NFL team has stayed in their home longer than us!
Too bad the NHL has no such venue. Maple Leaf Gardens was the last of its kind, and I'd love to see a modern version of a such an arena.
@@fpjrzman that's why I kinda count MSG for both NBA/NHL as it's the oldest venue for both leagues. Saddledome is supposed to be replaced soon, and I wouldn't be surprised if Anaheim replaces the pond soon as that was built in 1993.
As a person that ran track at Oregon. All the cool ass stadiums for the ducks are on the other side of the Willamette river. But Historic Hayward will never ever be torn down 😤
As long as Packer nation is alive Lambeau will never falter
@frenchfrey65
Hate to say it but Penn Station is putting savage pressure on NYC to demolish Madison Square Garden so They can expand their train service
We still call it Heinz Field, god dammit!!!
Honorable mention to MetLife as a whole. I am a Giants fan and would rather see the team play on the road than go to that POS.
@@HIITisHARD I think the Giants are going to be back in New York State by 2038-2040. As it looks like NJSEA is supposed to be dissolved by then. I think the Giants are going to end up in Weschester County, specifically in Yonkers. I think the Jets will probably end up on Long Island somewhere.
@grantandersen luckily, the stadium was privately funded by both teams, instead of taxpayers footing the bill to pay over $1 billion to get built and be disappointed for wasting that amount for a modern NFL stadium that looks stale, generic, and unattractive.
I went to a Giants game there a few years ago and thought, there is no way this stadium costs 1.6 billion dollars.
@@tonecot8932 Yeah it’s a shithole ain’t it.
As a Washington fan, I would rather go to MetLife. Fed Ex field is a dumpster. Should get Waste Management to sponsor it. Location sucks and the stadium is a functioning toilet bowl. Never again will I waste a dime going to a game there.
Arrowhead is fine. Spruce it up a bit and call it a day. It's got fairly pretty lines and is easily accessible to most of the city with ample, if expensive, parking(in a city that is very car-centric). That being said, they'll still overcomplicate it and overspend, crippling public coffers further. Oh well.
The RFK Stadium site is the best location
I hear that sone want to put affordable housing in that area & that's the holdup
M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, MD, is a quality stadium consistently updated by the Ravens in partnership with the MD Stadium Authority. The stadium is located downtown, adjacent to mass transit, and major attractions (Inner Harbor, Horseshoe Casino, ...). What other cities build, Baltimore has grown into.
Both M&T as well as Camden Yards are going to stand the test of time because of the location, the fact that they are both in good shape, and both are going to build more things around their stadiums. The O's renovations haven't started yet, but once they kick in, that complex is going to be cooler than ever.
Soldier Field: 🤬
Chad Lambeau Field: 💪
This comment can also be used to describe the fan bases 😂
Every time I blink, the Commanders remove another section of the upper deck.
The Superdome is not fucking allowed to go away. Like you said, it has survived too much. It's a symbol of goddamn unkillability at this point.
I'd be pissed off if they replaced it in my lifetime.
They just put a massive amount of money into an interior rebuild.
Superdome isn't going anywhere.
I went to the superdome in December for lions/saints and I felt like I was in a arena
Saw the Saints beat the Panthers there in 2010 and it gets loud inside.
There’s nothing wrong with the Superdome! It needs to remain intact another 50 years!
@@boogitybear2283 Hell yeah! I'm not even from the area, but to me? The Superdome is THE place to see football. There's a reason it has hosted so many Super Bowls.
Arrowhead should begin to fall into the category of Lambeau. It is iconic. It's very design funnels noise to the field (which is against the rules with new designs). If the Chiefs move, that whole "loudest stadium in the NFL" thing goes away. Look up the video of John Elway whining because it's too loud in Arrowhead. That is a legit piece of homefield advantage being taken away if they tear down Arrowhead. The Hunts would be stupid to do that. Plus, they have more money than ever now and they should fund the renovations themselves.
Waste of tax payer money. Some of these teams could sell out 120,000 seats every game. that’s the only reason a team should be asking for a new stadium Is to meet demand for more seats. And stop asking for tax payer money for renovations
Shoutout to Chase Center in San Francisco for being built entirely without public money
@@therock238360It's because SF passed a law. If a stadium gets built or renovated with taxpayers $$ the stadium can't have a corporate name. So that's why SF stadiums are privately founded. I also think they get property tax breaks too if they don't take the people's money.
There are other reasons. A big reason for the Highmark replacement is some structural deficiencies in the upper deck. Engineers working for the state, not the team, estimated that the stadium would need to be replaced or rebuilt in the 2030s due to deterioration of the rebar in the concrete due to freeze thaw and vibration. That's a big reason for the stadium issue in Buffalo finally getting traction with politicians after 20 years of the team asking.
Sure, they could rebuild the existing building. But the argument more or less came down to do we pay 1.5 to rebuild what we have, or pay 1.8 for a building with nicer amenities.... Or 3 for a dome.
Seriously, these teams could afford to build 2-3 stadiums EACH and pay for every penny out of their own pockets and still be in the black.
Yea but what do u want the federal govt to mandate no city can provide incentives? In America that eoukd be called communism and i doubt the supreme court would even allow that. An NFL team does bring in tax revenue and most NFL owners could put their investment in the NFL into an index fund and make more money off of it. Not saying I care about the owners at all, i dont. I do care about what an nfl team means to a city.
Govt could also force nfl teams to allow the cities to buy the team then they get all the profit if the owners refuse to pay to build stadiums but again, even a liberal court would be 50/50 on allowing that law to stand given the implications. Like I could see this the supreme court allowing the govt to take over sports but it would be over some made up transgender scare, def not doing it in a way that benefits the people of a city over a billionaire owner. So prolly better cities just negotiate for the best deal possible to get the team and not be afraid to let the team leave cuz in most cases they will get another team at a decent deal since there is a market.
Heinz Field (I’ll never call it that new name, screw that) has always been perfect for the Steelers. The only thing they did wrong was close up the open end, that was a significant home field advantage. But it has great sight lines, not even the nosebleed seats are bad, the open steel framework is very Pittsburgh, and the grass field itself is something the players love. It doesn’t need to be replaced. It’s not like Pittsburgh will ever host a Super Bowl.
Replacing Three Rivers had to happen. Replacing Heinz Field does not.
There isn't anywhere they could put a new stadium at anyway. Unless it's outside the city like where Century 3 is
MetLife was due a replacement the same day it opened! The acoustics for concerts is pretty good tho
“Just like you probably were, this stadium was born in the 90s”
**flat stare in GenX**
It's crazy how short some stadiums last. A stadium that is less than 30 years old is considered "old."
This goes well in tandem with Tree's vid The Great Stadium Grift. You'd really want to get at least 40 years for something that could be a long term debt for the city.
"and the Glazers probably don't even care." Exactly.
Fuck tax dollars for pro stadiums.
A waste of tax payer money
That's the NFL ownership's first play, hold a city hostage, threat to leave, unless the city passes a tax bill to help pay for a stadium. Of course each stadium is different, some are owned by the team owner, some owned by the city or county, so it can get complicated. But ultimately, it's BS to tax (which means you just take the money) versus lets say an investment. I would be more prone to give money to a local stadium rebuild if I knew I was going to get a return on my investment. But they'd rather just take the money and use it and reap the benefits themselves.
Ya don’t say.
As long as the owners pay 100% of the cost. Yeah, right! That’ll happen.
Man, I barely care about sportspuckball these days but I dig your vids. You have the snark of someone who grew up in the 80s and 90s. Feels like home.
Or if cheap ass owners had to pay for the stadium vs suckers, (ie cities) they would have lasted longer!
Public funding for professional stadiums needs to be banned by a constitutional amendment.
@@markbollinger1343 I think we have far bigger issues than sports stadiums
Brookpark is literally 20 min from downtown Cleveland and brookpark technically borders Cleveland anyways, it’s not way outside of Cleveland…
I thought I read rumors the Broncos are already wanting to do something with the New Mile High Stadium, which is barely over 25 years old. I remember seeing it get built, so it's insane to think these expensive monstrosities have such a short life span. In fact, it feels like a conspiracy of architects and construction firms to make sure they can get billion dollar contracts!
Those bastards!
And don't forget it was also state funded
They won’t be replacing it. Most likely just wide scale renovations.
As an architect, if there were that kind of money to be had in these public projects, I'd be living a lot better than a 1br apartment...
For a lot of these, it's lack of maintainence or desire for new amenities or technological advancement. Being a bills fan, I'll use Highmark as a good example. The stadium was built in 73 and wasn't made for the large electronics of today. It wasn't until the last renovation that it was able to even support the ribbon video boards and modern broadcast infrastructure in a meaningful way. A big reason the Bills didn't have prime time games for 20 years, aside from the drought and bad teams, was that there wasn't a way to hook up the sky cam in the stadium that all the prime time games used.
Now, a big reason for the replacement is that the exposed concrete structure of the upper deck is suffering damage from exposure and vibration. And it became a question of, do we keep slapping billion dollar bandaids on the building every 10 years, or spend 2 billion and have a building you don't have to touch for 30 years outside technology and finishes.
As for a building like FedEx. It was built by the lowest bidder, it was built with exposed structure. And it's ownership put absolutely 0 effort into upkeep so it's falling apart. Compared to Baltimore which took care of their building of the same era. And I can say, aside from some faded plastic on the seats, that building still looks pretty good
Their place is cool AF the way the upper deck of seating is shaped/curved.
I love soldier field, if the bears were smart ( ha, what a funny), they would of bought the stadium, tear down the interior, rebuild to the original specs, copy michigan stadium, and keep it simple. Wow sounds like i'm smarter than my hometown team
I liked the original Soldier Field when I went there in '98. I agree with you that they should've kept the exterior.
@@msarzo yeah it's not hard to do.
use michigan stadium as a template, have the bowl below ground level with the iconic exterior rebuilt to its '98 facade and add in modern features.
it's not hard to understand but chicago gonna chicago
I agree,but when I comes to watching games live at soldier field I love it .I feel your real close to the field.but all the technology and all the bells and whistle s it sevely lacks no doubt
@@bradburke8363 yup
What makes you think the Bears are going to spend a penny to build their own stadium? They're trying to gouge the taxpayer just like every other professional sports team? As if the Bears are going to spend a billion dollars of their own pocket get real
Let their BILLIONAIRE owners buy one then.
Arrowhead should never be demolished
The upper deck will collapse
Brooke Park is literally 10 miles away connected via light rail to downtown Cleveland lmao you make it sound like they're leaving the state
It already happened once . . .
Got to give Seattle credit... both their MLB and NFL stadiums were built in the late 90's, and despite being 25 years old no one there has even remotely considered replacing or renovating either one. They've done a great job maintaining both, and both feel fresh and new even today.
too bad they couldn't keep their NBA team
All these “your mom” jokes are going to require a “dam son”.
I’ve been to Commanders Field and the site of RFK in the last 7 months. Both need to be leveled the former as it completely sucks and the latter as it’s really dilapidated. Would be great to build a new one on the site…
They better have gotten new generators in the Superdome for the SB this time 💀
Let the teams build their own stadiums
I don't think anyone wants Lambeau touched similarly to how they don't want Wrigley or Fenway touched
Raymond James Stadium hosted a Super Bowl in 2021, as well as WrestleMania, and 2016 wasn’t exactly forever to host the College Football Playoff.
I’d expect gradual renovations over any full blown replacement.
You’ll notice the Tampa Bay Rays are building a new ballpark right next to their old one in a location no one except St. Petersburg people seem to like.
Why? Hillsborough County/Tampa wasn’t in the mood to put up the public funding St. Pete and Pinellas County are willing to.
Hopefully, their development supplies fans, because they’re on the hook!
Bank of America Stadium has been looooooong overdue for a replacement. Sucks that us Panthers fans will probably have to wait 20 years before we get a suitable replacement. As for that upcoming renovation, it's nothing but a band-aid placed on a festering wound.
I love how the stadium looks and its location. But I guess for years it's been lagging...
If you want to replacement Stadium go to your bank withdraw $20,000 and give it to the team. Tell thousands of your fellow fans to also give the team $20,000. Then you'll get your Stadium without having to gouge the taxpayers like I know you think you're about to do. Screw off use your own money.
Honestly I just don't care about the team anymore, and I probably feel apathetic toward the league as a whole. Maybe it's burnout from following last season much more than college, which proved to be a mistake after the playoffs we got.
(I am definitely excited for CFB this season more with the expanded playoff)
Paycor/Paul Brown Stadium was built with grade Z concrete. I was there for the first NFL game, a preseason game. It look so amazing, but as I was walking I saw cracks in the concrete everywhere. Our tickets were in the lower bowl, 8 rowes up on the 40. Excellent seats, but chunks of concrete were already falling off the thing! It is easily one of the biggest construction scams in NFL history. With the costs of replacement of concrete, etc., the stadium cost taxpayers about 1 billion dollars.
Cleveland’s new stadium would be far outside the city? Uh, it will be literally less than one thousand FEET from the Cleveland city border…
Nothing like people with a net worth north of several billion dollars holding the middle class hostage to build them stadiums to make them even more money.
I wonder what a retro-classic football stadium would look like.
Arrowhead looks retro in some places.
@@ironfox4990 no arrowhead looks brutalist in some places.. retro classic means like lambeau field. that concrete style has always looked ugly. i think a mix of M&T and lambeau would be retro classic
@@BrysonConroy Lambeau Feild is the most BUTT-UGLY stadium in football.
@@dolphinwizard13 fun fact, you are in the minority there
@@BrysonConroy take away the "mystique" and it's a toilet bowl.
I actually hope the NFL dosent make any new stadiums after ones that are already being built because you won’t get weather games which is a spirit of football that historic people in the NFL like John Madden loved. I know that some stadiums have opening domes but they don’t typically open them unless it’s good weather and most of the concepts for the new stadiums don’t seem to include this feature
Arrowhead is just fine no need to upgrade or replace
It’s literally one of the worst stadiums in the nfl. Just like dodgers stadium, just because it’s iconic doesn’t mean it isn’t a total dump. It’s so bad compared to any of the modern nfl stadiums. And it’s not like Lambeau which is a timeless classic. Arrowhead is as antiquated as the coliseum was, and if chiefs fans remain in denial about this and hold up renovations I’m sure the hunts will have no problems relocating the team. This isn’t college football. The nfl doesn’t care about tradition and history. If you don’t have an ultramodern world class stadium that’s beautiful to look at you’re already behind. That place is an eyesore from the inside and out, no different from the dump the panthers play at.
It definitely needs upgrades. But something tells me they want to keep the “layout” so it remains extremely loud compared to new stadiums.
@@georgehenan853 that a fucking lie. The stadium is no where near one of the worst stadiums in the league. Nothing about the stadium is in disrepair. And it wasn't that long ago it was renovated. I bet you're from KS talking down about Chiefs' fans not being excited fund two brand new stadiums in KCMO. Not every stadium needs to look like it should be on the Vegas strip.
@@StuntzMcKenzy2D this is the nfl. Stadiums shouldn’t be ugly eyesores. Arrowhead is hideous from the outside. Looks like a stadium from the 60’s or 70’s. Because it is. It’s a dump. Stop being so defensive about it.
@@georgehenan853 "don't be defensive while I'm being defensive." You said something deal with it. Once again you sound like you're from Kansas or you don't pay bills. Because you're not acknowledging what comes with giving the Chiefs and the Royals both new stadiums in a city that is already complaining about how high rent and/or property taxes already are. You speak as if money isn't a finite resource in an economically shakey period of time.
I don't understand how they get public funding. It's unimaginable in football here in the UK.
Jerry needs a new stadium so he can get a bigger screen punters can hit more frequently.
I guarantee that the Jets and Giants will abandon the monstrosity known as MetLife stadium and New Jersey altogether so the Jets can build it in either Brooklyn (Williamsburg-Greenpoint),
Queens (either Long island city, Flushing, or Jamaica: when Aqueduct Racetrack closes for good), Nassau, or Suffolk county, while the Giants can build it in either the Bronx, Westchester (next to Yonkers Raceway or Rockland county by 2040 and the Meadowlands stadium will be replaced with real affordable housing, retail/restaurants and entertainment as well
What do you mean the Jets can build their stadium? You mean the Jets will try to gouge a community to build the stadium for them. Any City that builds the stadium for an NFL team have been played for fools
In fact I think that’s gonna happen. I got some friends who are close with the Giants, in NJ who tell me that once MetLife expires, NJ is going to be done with both teams by 2038-2040, seeing as by that year NJSEA, is set to dissolve. They’ve also told me that by 2035 the Giants are planning to move their Headquarters and Training Facility up to Weschester County most likely, White Plains. And their next Stadium will most likely be in Yonkers.
@@grantandersen I concur to that and the Jets (once the major corporation in New York City buys the franchise from the Johnson family) will sell the Training facility in Florham Park to the highest bidder and construct their new facility in either Maspeth (stadium would be built in Williamsburg-Greenpoint) Queens
(Sunnyside Yard, Flushing or Jamaica) either way it's a winner for both sides
@@metsandjetsfan5174 The reason why Weschester County makes the most sense for the Giants is because the Mara’s and the Tisches are from and live there. The front office actually kinda operates out of Weschester already.
ny jets had shea stadium in ny and before leon hess moved jets to nj
I'm impressed with the Superdome Stadium
MetLife turf
I don’t Heinz Field is going anywhere anytime soon. It’s still in pretty good condition and let’s be honest, the city won’t help pay for a billion dollar stadium. If anything I eventually see them moving their practice facility and front office to a more modern facility located outside of the city to make it more attractive to free agents but that’s about it.
I'm not ready for the day Ford Field needing to be replaced. That's gonna just tell me I'm an old man. I'm in my late 20's.
I hate to tell you, but Ford Field sucks! Nobody can fit in the seats, it's way too cramped, and you can't view shit from the upper deck. Went there for a few lions games and a TSO concert and could barely see anything. It may not be the worst stadium, but it definitely needs to be replaced...and soon. Maybe if the lions win the Superbowl this year
@@mrmuscle7 What NFC North Team fanbase you representing?
@@jefferyfinguy1957 it's just my honest opinion.
@@mrmuscle7 Say your team man, simple question. Don't dodge it.
@@jefferyfinguy1957 I like the lions. I'm not dodging anything.
Owners should have to pay for 100% of the stadiums they build instead of burdening the tax payers every time they want to get into a junk measuring contest with their fellow scumbag rich people.
If you ask ownership.. the stadiums are obsolete by the end of their 3rd season (if that long).. they are never happy with what they have. Nice attitude when it's not YOUR money building it. I sitll say, make them build it themselves. That's why Lambeau is still around. Team owned.. team maintained.
Funny thing regarding Everbank: This will technically be the 2nd Total Renovation/Rebuild that may utilize some portions of the Gator Bowl
it's honestly ridiculous how short the lifespans of us stadiums are
At least there not building any for the World Cup
I just want Bank of America to keep naming rights for Carolina so I can continue to call it BofA Stadium (not b of a, but all one word bofa).
I truthfully don't think the superdome will ever be replaced. I was born in New Orleans and that stadium is a beacon of hope in the city. The Louisiana historic landmarks guidelines states that the "Building has to be 50 years old and also retain enough of its original architectural design and materials to properly reflect its reason for and period of significance." So by the time that superbowl rolls around there will probably be work to have it designated as a landmark. If they don't get the ball rolling by then, I will.
Ugliest stadium of all.
Superdome will always be da Superdome
Hope you're right. Only dome in use, in football, that I like
Ever heard of FedEx Feld and the Oakland Colosseum?
This reply was for Zoner
Your moms house is overdue for a replacement
Thank you for liking the comment, I wish you well Five
The bills having a dome kinda takes away from the whole snowy buffalo games arura
It isn’t going to be a dome
How in the world is the NFL allowing the commanders to continue playing another down in that building? I would be furious if I was a fan. Y’all deserve better.
Thanks FP ! You make stadiums interesting. It’s great knowledge to share with friends n fam 🏈🍑🥒🌶🏀🍺
Russell Wilson catching strays out here which is more than what his receivers did 🤣
I’m one of the few Panthers fans that thinks BOA is perfectly fine. And with how bad we are, we don’t deserve nice things anyway
I don't understand Miami's Hard Rock Stadium, being the 5th smallest. I wonder why they haven't gone bigger if they host the Super Bowl as often as they do?
Ngl, kinda wish the opposite happened with the Miami Orange Bowl
Indeed. Marlins and Dolphins/Canes need to switch locations.
Yeah I’m not a fan of loan depot stadium
I go from stadium for work. Of the stadiums I’ve been to the only one I felt needed to be replaced was KC. It looks like a great place to watch a game but underneath it was designed poorly. I don’t see how it can be fixed. The best option is probably to replace. Here’s the thing… if they are going to replace it with a stadium designed by someone that has no idea what they are doing they should probably just save the money and keep playing in the stadium they have.
For any city looking to replace a stadium my advice would be don’t make it harder than it needs to be. Just call the builder and tell them to build you Cowboys Stadium. Of all of the stadiums I’ve been to it’s the best by a bunch.
You can’t have a new stadium open in Chicago if they haven’t settled on a location yet 😨🤔😬
Didn’t know about Jacksonville…but not surprised.
Yo owners, build your own …
I just heard Cleveland going to the Brook Park Dome is a done deal......
Congrats? Are you happy about it?
Clevelander here our mayor offered 460 million to stay but the dome is pretty much a done deal 4.6 billion
An AFC north team in a dome is so off brand and just doesn’t feel right.
@@ajwilson1985London living 216 raised, I want a rebuild on the lake more than I can even fathom.
I was in Cleveland for Summerslam and stayed near Brooklyn Park. It's only a 15-20 minute drive to downtown. Plus there's plenty of public transit to get from there to the city.
I'd argue Gillette Stadium probably needs to be added to this list.
Nah, it gets renovated pretty often and has a massive entertainment pavilion. Plus it’s 100% owned by the Kraft family so there is no risk of them losing it.
Brand new renovation. Kraft didn’t pour money into it for nothing.
The real question is: are any of these stadiums as old as FivePoints himself? 😁
The Superdome
Cleveland browns new stadium is actually almost 4x the cost of the 1 billion dollar renovation at 3.6 BILLION dollars.
While I can't speak for everyone, I'm personally fine with my Dolphins playing in Hard Rock for a long time. Love that stadium.
The Arrowhead renderings you posted after the Kansas stadium are out of order. The renovation renderings were "before" the vote that was rejected in April. Therefore the images you posted about a renovation are in fact what was turned down. The Kansas stadium proposal is the last thing on the board for the Chiefs as of this time. So the team is not "Leaning toward renovations. In fact if you dive deep into the bellows of this vote and the proposals, this vote for renovations was set up to fail so the Chiefs and Royals can get new stadiums outside of KCMO.
10:18 Yinzers, including me, just had a heart attack not only because Acrisure Stadium was on the list but also because you spelled PITTSBURGH as PITTSBURG
I worked at commanders field for events, the toilets gets backed up so bad that the rest rooms get flooded.
So, the fans are also full of shit, not just the team.
Some of these stadiums can be rehabbed for a lot less taxpayers money.
HEINZ FEILD!!!
There is absolutely nothing wrong with Arrowhead as it is.
It’s a total dump. Stop being in denial. It’s no different from dodgers stadium. Just because it’s iconic doesn’t mean it isn’t severely outdated. Both are objectively godawful stadiums towards the bottom of their leagues. Chiefs fans need to stop lying to themselves. That stadium is a total dump in the bottom tier of stadiums now that places like the coliseum have been replaced.
Okay so as much as I love arrowhead, which I FUCKING LOVE ARROWHEAD. It does need to be updated. But never replaced. Look what the Packers were able to do. I don’t see why Arrowhead can’t get the same treatment. Unlike Highmarks supposed cold advantage, Arrowheads noise is an actual advantage. And it get pretty cold here too lol. Never replace. Just renovate.
@@georgehenan853Bro that’s not the point. A lot of us don’t care about shiny new stadiums. It’s a waste of money first of all and secondly I go to Arrowhead to watch football not explore a stadium. If something has to be done with Arrowhead it should be renovation. Look at Lambeau. They were able to save a historic stadium and make it livable for the casuals and spouses.
@@stormageddon248 Lambeau is a much nicer well designed stadium. But it’s more like a nice college football stadium. Arrowhead is terrible. And yes, we do like nice shiny stadiums, this is the nfl. If you care about tradition and history, and the football itself you watch college football. The nfl is about money, appearances, social media clicks, and financial viability. And arrowhead fails in all of them.
I think they waiting on the royals to move downtown so they can renovate it
Before I even watch I doubt NRG will be on here, that stadium has awesome views all over it for football games and concerts plus it’s got that big ass screen if you don’t wanna look down
I don't think taxpayers should be on the hook for "ANY" money to build a stadium. Let the billion dollar league finance and pay for their playing arenas. Last time I went to a football game, I guess it was only 1 game, tickets were like $60 per and then I had to buy a 6pack of beer to get a single cup and buy a full pack of ball park franks to get one dog. It was NOT a family friendly outing what so ever.
So ... I choose to not go, if you choose to go great, but I shouldn't have to subsidize the cost of your entertainment. I'm all about subsidizing the cost of things which has a necessity to them like roads and public schools, but your entertainment doesn't even make the top 10 million of things. If I have to pay to revamp roads / traffic around said venue well that falls into a necessity and ... I suppose (lol).
If a football stadium wants to defray the costs .... then partner with the local baseball team, a huge concert promoter, something else that can bring in the people and the $$'s .... or go ahead charge $100's per ticket and make the fans support the TRUE cost of their entertainment.
Agreed 100%. I'm sick and tired of these backyard sport playing people getting paid a lot more money than teachers all the while receiving taxpayer funding.
NFL = rigged anyway and therefore shouldn't receive a penny!
If these leach owners literally just had 1 good design and spent their money on the field, they wouldn’t have to use the venue as a selling point. Case in point, Arizona/Phoenix Coyotes.
I lost my mom 15 years ago yet your jokes about moms are awesome. Keep it up. 👍👍
No stadium needs replacement. Owners are just greedy
Soon it seems it'll all be indoor stadiums which sucks.
Roofed stadiums were the beginning of the garbage product the NFL now craps out.
I hate it so much. Gonna miss having crazy weather games
@@BobbyDazzler28 - Yep. Just can't play football outside anymore. Lot of fans cry about it too. Clearly it's becoming a thing of the past and nothing we can do about it unfortunately. At least in college we'll still have outdoor games and actual places that resemble a sports stadium from the outside.
In Philadelphia, there was once a stadium called Veterans Stadium, aka The Vet, which was home to both The Philadelphia Eagles, and The Philadelphia Phillies. It served both teams for 33 years. It was replaced by two stadiums, Lincoln Financial Field, aka The Linc, for The Eagles, and Citizens Bank Park, for The Phillies. The Linc is now more than 20 years old, and Citizens Bank is now almost 20 years old, and, amazingly, so far, there is no talk of replacing either stadium. I remember, when The Vet was imploded over 20 years ago, one fan of The Vet, who remembered that stadium from when it was brand new, was so heartbroken, that he said that he would probably be crying every night for the next 33 years after the implosion.
We had the "Moldy Cereal Bowl" that I called Riverfront Stadium in Cincinnati. It was the powerplant for the Big Red Machine
Billionaires should pay for stadiums out of their own pockets! Don't Burden taxpayers! There's nothing wrong with the NFL stadiums of today!
The Caesar's Superdome is ranked #39, while Smoothie King Center is above it in #36. However, the Commander's Field is dead last at # 90. Yes, this is coming from Sports illustrated's list.
I love this channel, I’ve never been to the US but it’s wild to think that a stadium built 50 years ago is classed as ‘old’… In the UK that’s still relatively new 😅
If the browns stadium turns out to be a success 2 out of the 3 AFC north teams will follow suite. Pitt may keep theirs simply because where the hell would you build a replacement?
Baltimore isn't going to follow suit either. If you consider that the Ravens renovation project is designed to make M&T Bank Stadium a much more modern place from the outside even though it has been open since 1998. The Blackwing suites they added this year and the underground stadium clubs on each side that they are adding next year, plus wider concourses are proof of it. Not to mention there's literally nowhere else you could build a new structure because Horseshoe and Top Golf are already there, plus there's Oriole Park at Camden Yards which is also going to receive major renovations in the next year.
I forgot how old HardRock is . 😮 or The House that Dan Built . 😂😂❤❤
Commanders should just build their new stadium at the old rfk stadium site
Do public schools next
It's amazing the stadiums built in the late 90s do kinda feel obsolete which is hard to believe