The fnaf 1 animatronics caused the hiroshima bombing, the funtime animatronics are taking refuge. The hung technicians are nazis, and michael afton partaked in the making of the bomb.
I mean, the main problem with entertaining that Ballora part of Adult Theory is that HandUnit states that Ballora encourages kids to "get fit... and enjoy pizza" lol
Which is extra funny now, because in Security Breach Chica has that exact same dichotomy. They use her to advertise their exercise activities to keep kids fit and then encourage them to go eat pizza as a reward. And that's even putting aside Chica's eating disorder.
@@bendrowned8506 pizzaplex lunk alarm. if Gregory drops even a piece of paper or a crumb it sounds the alarm and Chica teleports behind him like an enderman
@@Some_random_StickmanHAH, LOOOOOL🤣🤣🤣(damn.....now im wondering......what if FNaF 2 Toy Chica could be actually secretly created for the same purpose😂?)
Fun fact: the original Dolly Dimples animatronic (build in 1978 for the second Pizza Time Theater location) had a special mechanism for bouncing her bosom, she would also flirt with the audience members and talk about her multiple previous husbands.
"This theory is about the pigtail girl in FNAF4 being Elizabeth. That's it. There's nothing else to it but there's nothing that contradicts it so I find this one easy to accept." "Okay so the next one theorizes that Sister Location takes place in an alternate universe..."
@nothanks1508 except she's literally not blonde Her sprite shows her with bright orange hair, she's only blond in the comics, the ones already confirmed to be a alternate universe
@@lemonsmug Because you never actually saw CB in the game, and her animatronic was seen once, and it was just the body this was 2020 so I dont know what i was thinking, but like genuinely to me Ennard and baby were two diff entities and CB was just a facade
I’m actually pretty sure I heard this theory before, it’s that Baby was scrapped and used by the other Funtimes (who were the real villains) who used her voice to lure you into a trap.
I read a 100 page long document once about MikeVictim and even if I don’t believe the theory the amount of dedication it took to make a 100 page document saying it’s canon is mad respect.
I think the idea that the Funtimes as a whole represent his family has a lot of interesting merit, even if you do gotta stretch logic a bit. Baby=Elizabeth, Funtime Foxy=Mike, Ballora=Mrs. Afton, Funtime Freddy=CC. The last one is the hardest to rationalize, but there's the obvious bear connection, the fact that he has a little friend on his hand at all times that talks to him like Fredbear Plush and CC, and that he makes multiple references to "friends" and "the birthday boy". Not the craziest thing in the world to assume William took inspiration from tragedy and made it into these horrific child-murderers. If anything, that's just William up to his usual bullshit. This can all be completely separate from the idea that Ballora has either Mrs. Afton's soul or even her body inside of her, which is just dumb.
I read a theory that her very design would cause the Karens and Kevins to be so busy pearl clutching about her that would give the other Funtimes the opportunity to snatch their crotch goblins ☠️
Immortal and restless meaning was confirmed in the survival logbook. There’s a prompt about which character you relate to and Michael responds with “Clara from the immortal and the restless because everything about this place is crazy and no one notices except me”. He relates to Clara being gaslight as the same thing is happening to him about freddies😂
@@SourAttmoz "She was wearing elegant clothing, and her gestures were confident, sophisticated, but it was all no more than if Jessica had given her the makeover she was always threatening." "I ran into one one of the charlies, the bad one, she was taller and a little attractive."
About the first theory: The survival logbook seems to actually clear up that tv show's meaning. Mike writes in the book that he relates to Clara, basically because people don't seem to believe what he's witnessing as a security guard(aka. Everyone's gaslighting Mike hard) Which connects to the "The baby isn't mine" thing, where Clara for a fact knows it's Vlad's, he just keeps brushing it off and attempting to lie his way out of the accusations. Also Clara burns down a building same as Mike, if he's the fnaf 3 night guard as is heavily implied. *edit: to everyone commenting: we all know that the true protagonist of fnaf 3 is actually bon-bon, calm down. >:3
@@nanuqo2006 I suppose i should have said "heavily theorizes", that's my mistake. Afterall barely anything's confirmed in fnaf~ Though I swear that i heard that one of thous "goozebumps" type fnaf books had a story that strengthened that theory? Haven't read them though, so I can't verify the source of thous claims. (Though none of that affects the true meaning of that tv-show connection, the text in the survival logbook is basically a confirmation~ {I know that's also not ur point, i'm just mentioning for other readers.})
I'm surprised no one is mentioning the fact that in the Sister Location secret blueprints, it is VERY heavily implied that Ballora is specifically made to lure the adults and parents away from the children while Funtime Foxy lures the kids over to Funtime Freddy or Baby to have them be scooped and killed. Meaning that the "adult theory" about Ballora specifically is basically confirmed. And I saw arguments in the comments about HandUnit saying that Ballora "encourages kids to get fit and enjoy pizza" but honestly I imagine that Ballora is disguised as an attraction for the kids but is really meant for distracting adults. Mainly because I'm sure if she were marketed as an attraction for adults, people would be more likely to get suspicious about their kids disappearing.
I think for a long time it was assumed that we were playing as William here (as Ennard thought we were him, and we know he’s used aliases before, such as “Dave Miller” in The Silver Eyes) for this and every game other than the third and fourth ones (which is why the animatronics are trying to kill you- this doesn’t explain Phone Guy’s death, though). I didn’t know that the Mike being the Crying Child theory usually came with “William is Foxy Bro”- I thought that it was typically just completely unaddressed. Miketrap Theory was that Mike was Springtrap; the missing kids mistook him for his father, and then somehow killing him helped their spirits move on, despite the fact that killing Phone Guy didn’t cause Happiest Day.
@@SRobot08 like a week ago with my friend i mentioned something to do with the name dave miller and then i was like "dave miller dsaf or dave miller the silver eyes? ...you'll never know" (to be fair it was about the whole murdering children aspect so i think that applies to both of them)
I feel like the “Elizabeth Survived” theory was just something we all collectively thought of at some point and decided to gaslight the rest of the fandom into thinking that it’s a real theory by someone who exists
I think somebody made a troll post and somebody took it seriously and it got spread around as a serious theory. the person who originally posted it must have deleted it.
I do admit i did think ballora might have been for older kids, her design was just soo different, she was slightly less cartoonish and cuddly compared to the plush cute characters from the other games
Gotta love how people really tried to bring back the "nazi made robots" also people tried to say Michael was helping covering up the murders because of his speech after the custom night cutscene
@@GalacticExplorer_Edits83 Ah yes, that one still makes me laugh. The fact that many hundreds of years ago, they secretly added obscure FNAF 2 lore in the song before Scott was even born.
adult theory hinging on the fact that ballora seems out of place is so silly because it is quite literally 3 different groups of animatronics/brands inside that rental bunker. the funtimes (as in, actual funtimes; foxy, freddy, chica, bonbon and bonnet [lolbit and yendo aswell]) the circus baby crew (baby, bidibabs and mystery springlock suit), and then the ballora crew (ballora, minireenas and whatever used to have the ennard mask if anything)
FNAF was always sci-fi. Advanced free roam animatronics connected to a criminal facial recognition database wirelessly, in the 80's? You just didn't notice it sooner because it was 'modern' tech in the 80s instead of slightly future tech in the 2020's.
For me i used to think ennard was a seperate entity than the other animatronics and was always present and was mimicking baby the entire time, with baby being deactivated throughout the game. Why did i ever think this
that theory is so simple(ish?) on the surface but if i had a nickel for everytime ive seen it used to justify the hellhouse of Michael x Ennard I would be on a motherfucking yacht. Still convinced to this day it was the shippers who started this. Sorry for replying with a spew of dumb bullshit
The high piano keys at the end of the SL trailer still give me chills. Also, I think the reason Ballora looks so different compared to the rest of the Funtimes is because William made her to look like his wife. I don't really have any evidence to support it, but it makes a little sense, right?
The weird thing about the “Michael isn’t William’s son” theory is that Michael literally says the animatronics thought he was his father. That’s kind of a dead giveaway
5:25 you know seeing how Michael becomes purple after he gets scooped and replaced by ennard and how ennard did such a smooth way of luring and deceiving Michael it does leave the possibility that there were other Funtime animatronics (Funtime Bonnie and chica which would explain why we see Funtime chica in ultimate custom night posing showing off how she stole william’s physical body) that became their own ennard doing the same with William and michaels ennard taking the plan but doing it much more smoothly also this would explain why the “full Funtime deal” night in HW 2 has Funtime chica as it shows she was also present in the establishment
My little silly theory about the vampire show is that the William is the Vampire Dad, the baby vampire represents the actual Baby animatronic, and the Mom is the police/ Henry/ anyone who questions William regarding the Baby animatronic. Just like how the vampire denies being the father, Michael denies the ‘design choices’ he made with Baby.
These theories did two things: 1. Reminded me that some people are stupid 2. Melted me brain and triggered me so I fee like I need to go stare at puppies for an hour
2:59 well.......yeah, but i have only one question:.......WHO THE HELL THOUGHT THAT THE OLDER BRO IS WILLIAM? Like, seriously, the theory itself, with Michael being the Bite Victim, is not so bad as you say, and possibly still can be true(+we still NEVER had any 100% confirmation about which FNaF 4 boy is Michael. I even somewhere saw a theory that NONE of them both can be Michael, so he possibly can be just yet another, "fourth kid" and "third brother"). Only problem is.....again, WHERE THE HELL YOU GET THE SPECULATION ABOUT WILLIAM & OLDER BROTHER? I'm the fan since 2018, and i NEVER heard about this sh#t.
The apocalypse one would make for a goddam amazing spin-off especially if it sticks with Scott's roots(like Desolate Hope which SL clearly leans more to)
Matpat popularised the theory of Michael being the cry child and was turned into a robot child after bite of 83 which is why he survived the scooping but matpat debunked this later himself
I don't know if you were joking or not but incase you weren't with the Ennard is the killer theory, no. On Springtraps design you can see flesh. Oh, we don't see any wires other than those weird red things that wrap around some of his parts. AND if those somehow were his wires, why is there no wires on Springtraps legs? Like yeah they are on his ankles but not his legs. Forgot to mention, all of the wires I mentioned previously are fleshy looking. Now lets take a look at Scraptrap. Not much to say about him, but his voice is clearly that of a humans and not Ennards. Also Springtrap was burned in Fnaf 3, which led to Scraptraps design. Also, Scraptrap is missing a forearm. An animatronic would not lose their arm to a fire. But a human who has already been decayed? Also I forgot to mention again, Ennards voice is clearly different than from Aftons. So yeah I may have gone way too in depth about something probably satire but who cares. Case closed.
The "Elizabeths Survives" theory reminds me how a few years ago my friend always rambled on about this theory that the originals were melted down to make the SL animatronics and they always told me everyone was talking about it and how true it was. I for 3 years of my life searched up and down for this theory.... It don't exist.
@@jakubgrono9070 I did a little research on that theory, you're correct. I'm gonna ask my friend if this was the theory they used to ramble on about because it does align with what they used to tell me lol. Thanks for the help!
When I was younger I was a diehard miketrap truther, thinking all the blood coming out of the spring bonnie suit was just… leftover pooled up blood that had just been sitting there all those years. I wasn’t too bright
There are two problems with the Ennard is the true killer theory. First, we see Ennard get lodged out of us in one cutscene, before we could supposedly die as Afton in the springlock suit (since we are not wearing it). And even then, we see that in fnaf 6 both William and Molten Freddy are two separate animatronics.
3:13 pretty sure we see Elizabeth in sister location tho you know when she get killed by baby. That sprite and the pigtail girl sprite are way to different from each other to be the same person
>That sprite and the pigtail girl sprite are way to different from each other to be the same person What about FNAF 4 and FNAF SL Michael? :V Orange Skinned dark dark brown hair man compared to a light brown pale man with an entirely different outfit?
Sprite differences between games don’t matter. Especially not in this series where there has literally been sprite differences within a single game (purple guy in FNAF 2 had 2 completely different sprites, and I’m pretty sure “Pink Guy” doesn’t exist).
2:12 If think about it, the theory kind of makes sense. Because the true reason William Afton killed the kids was to obtain their remnants and bring CC back from the dead. And that's what people think what happened. And obviously, the only reason he survived the scooper was because Baby gave him remanent after Ennard escaped Micheal's body. And there isn't real evidence that the older brother is William Afton.. Because.. Not once has anyone believed that as the theory. But mostly, people believe the other brother is someone different or just unrelated completely. But Scott so far made it look like CC was crying child.
I remember seeing a theory before Sister Location's release that the game would take place in a area under a Carousel of Progress/America Sings-style atttaction.
ever since the movie released ive been really interesting in looking at the game timeline and seeing how we could manipulate it to how michael wouldnt be williams son (which is obviously not true, the game and movie are both completely different timelines its just impossible) but idk its kinda fun to find obscured and stupid reasons for it its kinda fun
That theory with William being the older brother is bc because, if we ignore William being present in fnaf 4, there is no way he could have been a young teenager in 1983 and a grown man four years later in 1987
I actually thought the ennard theory was kinda neat- obviously not real but it could have been an interesting twist if that had been plotted around! Maybe it’s a hot take, but I feel like Afton is really boring compared to his creations. We have nothing to go off of but the books for what he’s actually like, and the books aren’t too reliable in this case I don’t think. I really liked ennard and I didn’t care for his transition to being molten freddy and scrap baby
The pigtail theory is literally disproven in the 2D baby minigame, due to Baby having blue eyes before scooping Elizabeth. You called it the most believable, even though it's literally disproven with one minigame.
@nudlovec1966 "Pigtails and Green Eyes, just like Baby". Baby did not have green eyes until the scooping of Elizabeth. Also, Elizabeth in the minigame is BLONDE, while Pigtails Girl is ginger. Different Skin colors, Elizabeth's brighter than Pigtails girl. There is official art of Minigame Elizabeth, where's the drawings of Pigtail Girl? Just because a character looks similar, doesn't mean they're the same, because of Remnant magic making thoughts into reality. And now, please tell me at least ONE defining evidence that Pigtail Girl's actually the "Real Elizabeth" and not the one in the Baby Minigame, except "Well they have similar hair, and green eyes."
Sister location could take place in a semi-alternate timeline. Sorta like the difference between Mobile Suit Gundam and its three compilation movies, or between MSG The Origin vs, ya know, Mobile Suit Gundam proper. The idea is that it would be a seperate timeline that's identical in most ways, but with slight differences, mainly aesthetics in this case. Basically, just an explaination for why the tech seemed to jump so drastically from advanced but still semi-realistic endoskeletons with basically fursuit exteriors to crazy high-tech cables and coils that are, iirc, able to combine with one another once extracted from their exteriors. Also a machine that could remove all human organs in seemingly one go, but leave the skin basically intact. The idea isn't too complex; all prior FNAF games still take place more or less as written, with the biggest(if not only) changes being in aesthetic and technological level. Events remain unchanged in the broad and even some detailed strokes, with the biggest changes being aesthetics. Like if you put a sci-fi themed mod over Ocarina of Time without changing any of the mechanics or story
I used to love the Ennard is the real killer theory, it gave the series a fresh plot twist, too bad it was immediatly retconned with the release of Sister Location:Custom Night
@@boredianz Before Sister Location Custom Night there was no "Michael ejecting Ennard" minigame, so the ending was the bathroom scene where the player has purple eyes, this led many to believe that Purple Guy had been a robot in a human hide all the time. The idea however was scratched or retconned with the release of Sister Location Custom Night, where the Springtrap cutscene and the aformentioned minigame tease PizzaSim and reveal that Michael was the one scooped by Ennard.
@@rodrigocoockiemonster4460 Retcon implies that something canonical was changed. That implies that Scott LITERALLY Wrote William as being scooped by Ennard, in his own location by his own animatronics, and then 5 minutes later wrote it to be "Actually Michael got scooped, and William's just a killer", ignoring the deliberately designed murder robots before any scooping, with the intent of killing... Charlie was Retconned from a He to a She. This isnt a Retcon though, it just killed your headcanon :V
The bunker theory is so stupid, like it states that Michael is going to "come find his father," and thus, how would there be a nuclear fallout? Plus, we literally see Michael at Fazbear Frights in the post credits scene of Sister Location, so their evidence for the theory is not even possible
Ignoring contradictory evidence, I can understand why someone would come up with the Enard was the purple guy the whole time theory. When Michael gets scooped his skin turns purple as he decades and William as the purple guy has purple skin too. And the other time we see William, he had orange skin.
The idea of nuclear fallout happening and the only place to hide is a haunted pizzeria is absurdly hilarious.
Imagine them scooping someone and finally escaping the facility just to find out that the entire world is now a nuclear wasteland.
danganronpa type beat
It would probably go similarly to how Room Zero went
Yes, I need this
The fnaf 1 animatronics caused the hiroshima bombing, the funtime animatronics are taking refuge. The hung technicians are nazis, and michael afton partaked in the making of the bomb.
I mean, the main problem with entertaining that Ballora part of Adult Theory is that HandUnit states that Ballora encourages kids to "get fit... and enjoy pizza" lol
Which is extra funny now, because in Security Breach Chica has that exact same dichotomy. They use her to advertise their exercise activities to keep kids fit and then encourage them to go eat pizza as a reward. And that's even putting aside Chica's eating disorder.
@@StarkMaximumplanet fitness chica
Pizzagate conformed lmao
@@bendrowned8506 pizzaplex lunk alarm. if Gregory drops even a piece of paper or a crumb it sounds the alarm and Chica teleports behind him like an enderman
@@edgytoucan3444” you must leave gregory, you’re making others feel uncomfortable with all the running you’re doing”
"I assure you, making this sexy ballerina robot is necessary for a pizza restaurant": William Afton when pressured about Ballora's design
Probably to distract the parents to ignore the kids
@@Some_random_Stickmancertified canon
@@Some_random_StickmanHAH, LOOOOOL🤣🤣🤣(damn.....now im wondering......what if FNaF 2 Toy Chica could be actually secretly created for the same purpose😂?)
"With all due respect, those aren't the design choices we were curious about, Mr. Afton."
@@sanek-puppet-463The toy animatronics were made to be more family friendly so I think it was just a board member sneaking their furry fetish in
Fun fact: the original Dolly Dimples animatronic (build in 1978 for the second Pizza Time Theater location) had a special mechanism for bouncing her bosom, she would also flirt with the audience members and talk about her multiple previous husbands.
Wow, that’s totally for kids! /sarc
@@SQUISHYCANDYGUT they actualy had a sign saying "Especialy for mom and dad" by the door of the cabaret, but kids still loved it 😅
@@murilog.p.1383 oh god 😭
@@SQUISHYCANDYGUT they also used to have confederate flags around the main showroom in the late 70's and early 80's...
@@murilog.p.1383oh GREAT HEAVENS
"This theory is about the pigtail girl in FNAF4 being Elizabeth. That's it. There's nothing else to it but there's nothing that contradicts it so I find this one easy to accept."
"Okay so the next one theorizes that Sister Location takes place in an alternate universe..."
we've literally seen elizabeths sprite and she's blond, so idk what he was yapping abt
@nothanks1508 except she's literally not blonde
Her sprite shows her with bright orange hair, she's only blond in the comics, the ones already confirmed to be a alternate universe
@@jhehalin2008no in sister location she's blonde
@@jhehalin2008 ion know man, the sprite in ice cream mini game looks hella blond to me
@@jhehalin2008Have you seen the minigame in SL?
Thinking about that one time i convinced myself circus baby just wasn't real, like not a real character
Wha--
How?
@@lemonsmug Because you never actually saw CB in the game, and her animatronic was seen once, and it was just the body this was 2020 so I dont know what i was thinking, but like genuinely to me Ennard and baby were two diff entities and CB was just a facade
I’m actually pretty sure I heard this theory before, it’s that Baby was scrapped and used by the other Funtimes (who were the real villains) who used her voice to lure you into a trap.
@@GalacticExplorer_Edits83 I think it's a fun one for sure
And we never actually get a jumpscare from Baby till UCN
I read a 100 page long document once about MikeVictim and even if I don’t believe the theory the amount of dedication it took to make a 100 page document saying it’s canon is mad respect.
The one called "Spook's MikeVictim document" or something? I read that one too!
skyrats 250 page rule documentation:
@@StarHorder what does skyrat have to do with this?
surprised there was no mention of Ballora either being made in William's wife's image or containing the soul of his dead wife.
Exactly that’s a popular theory I have no idea why he didn’t mention it
@@GalacticExplorer_Edits83a theory so popular it gaslighted the entire fandom in the importance of a character that doesn’t even exist
Cause that theory wasn't around when Sister Location was released. That theory started at Custom night at least
@@caruizalfaro no it started sometime before FNaF 6
I think the idea that the Funtimes as a whole represent his family has a lot of interesting merit, even if you do gotta stretch logic a bit. Baby=Elizabeth, Funtime Foxy=Mike, Ballora=Mrs. Afton, Funtime Freddy=CC. The last one is the hardest to rationalize, but there's the obvious bear connection, the fact that he has a little friend on his hand at all times that talks to him like Fredbear Plush and CC, and that he makes multiple references to "friends" and "the birthday boy". Not the craziest thing in the world to assume William took inspiration from tragedy and made it into these horrific child-murderers. If anything, that's just William up to his usual bullshit.
This can all be completely separate from the idea that Ballora has either Mrs. Afton's soul or even her body inside of her, which is just dumb.
Saying William Afton is innocent is like saying edp did nothing wrong💀
WillCare supporters in shambles rn
Edp is disgusting
THAT IS LEGIT THE FIRST THING THAT CAME TO MY MIND
Edp is chicka confirmed,
Overweight?
An affinity for cupcakes?
EDP has to be chicka
What’s edp ?
Honestly, the fact these theories existed and nobody bats an eye at Michael being able to stand with no bones shows off the rails the story went.
With the Balora one... I mean i guess it could keep the parents away so no one is watching when Baby is alone with a kid
Her blueprints have "Deter and Misdirect" next to her chest, so that part is basically canon
@@almightykellus2585 LMAO DO THEY? what's in there? did afton just make her so thicc the adults wouldn't notice baby chomping their kids???
I read a theory that her very design would cause the Karens and Kevins to be so busy pearl clutching about her that would give the other Funtimes the opportunity to snatch their crotch goblins ☠️
new name for kids just dropped by@@Takejiro24: crotch goblin
Immortal and restless meaning was confirmed in the survival logbook. There’s a prompt about which character you relate to and Michael responds with “Clara from the immortal and the restless because everything about this place is crazy and no one notices except me”. He relates to Clara being gaslight as the same thing is happening to him about freddies😂
That is 100% why he watches the show
AdultTheory was technically canon when the books made Baby weirdly sexy, like several lines were dedicated to how hot people foubd her
What were the lines?
@@SourAttmoz "She was wearing elegant clothing, and her gestures were confident, sophisticated, but it was all no more than if Jessica had given her the makeover she was always threatening."
"I ran into one one of the charlies, the bad one, she was taller and a little attractive."
How da fuq ppl find baby hot. She's creepy looking.
@@eduardoaguero1220 Wasn't there a moment in the book where one dude fr gets turned on by her or smth?
Baby in the books is essentially like Charlie
She looks more human like
She still unnerving though
@@CheshireFGC
I feel like Ballora being an adult entertainer makes more sense to me. because she's basically just in a bra and a tutu 💀
About the first theory:
The survival logbook seems to actually clear up that tv show's meaning.
Mike writes in the book that he relates to Clara, basically because people don't seem to believe what he's witnessing as a security guard(aka. Everyone's gaslighting Mike hard)
Which connects to the "The baby isn't mine" thing, where Clara for a fact knows it's Vlad's, he just keeps brushing it off and attempting to lie his way out of the accusations.
Also Clara burns down a building same as Mike, if he's the fnaf 3 night guard as is heavily implied.
*edit: to everyone commenting: we all know that the true protagonist of fnaf 3 is actually bon-bon, calm down. >:3
Finally somebody agnoledeges this theory
Nothing heavily implies Mike is 3's guard. In fact, there's actually more evidence against it lol
Oh yea what evidenc that ther is a half eaten hot dog and you can breath wow very much evidence
Also the securtiy logbook
@@nanuqo2006 I suppose i should have said "heavily theorizes", that's my mistake.
Afterall barely anything's confirmed in fnaf~
Though I swear that i heard that one of thous "goozebumps" type fnaf books had a story that strengthened that theory?
Haven't read them though, so I can't verify the source of thous claims.
(Though none of that affects the true meaning of that tv-show connection, the text in the survival logbook is basically a confirmation~
{I know that's also not ur point, i'm just mentioning for other readers.})
You forgot to mention just WHO made adult theory, which makes it even weirder
And who did?
Ken carter
No joke
@@mohammad1.45the creator of Popgoes
And?
"Except for that one FNAF Sister Location theory. We don't talk about that one"
im curious now what theory?
@@amirhaikal6672 I'm just quoting what I said about Adult Theory in the FNAF 1 theories video
I'm surprised no one is mentioning the fact that in the Sister Location secret blueprints, it is VERY heavily implied that Ballora is specifically made to lure the adults and parents away from the children while Funtime Foxy lures the kids over to Funtime Freddy or Baby to have them be scooped and killed. Meaning that the "adult theory" about Ballora specifically is basically confirmed. And I saw arguments in the comments about HandUnit saying that Ballora "encourages kids to get fit and enjoy pizza" but honestly I imagine that Ballora is disguised as an attraction for the kids but is really meant for distracting adults. Mainly because I'm sure if she were marketed as an attraction for adults, people would be more likely to get suspicious about their kids disappearing.
I think for a long time it was assumed that we were playing as William here (as Ennard thought we were him, and we know he’s used aliases before, such as “Dave Miller” in The Silver Eyes) for this and every game other than the third and fourth ones (which is why the animatronics are trying to kill you- this doesn’t explain Phone Guy’s death, though).
I didn’t know that the Mike being the Crying Child theory usually came with “William is Foxy Bro”- I thought that it was typically just completely unaddressed.
Miketrap Theory was that Mike was Springtrap; the missing kids mistook him for his father, and then somehow killing him helped their spirits move on, despite the fact that killing Phone Guy didn’t cause Happiest Day.
That's because the kids were assholes
@@Juancr2006 *animals
Anytime I think of Dave miller I still remember “hey there old sport”
@@SRobot08 like a week ago with my friend i mentioned something to do with the name dave miller and then i was like "dave miller dsaf or dave miller the silver eyes? ...you'll never know" (to be fair it was about the whole murdering children aspect so i think that applies to both of them)
@@burner555 charlie was actually aware of everything they did, and not only allowed it, but helped them to try and kill Jeremy, they are assholes
4:18 This made me laugh hard, especially when he played the noise at the end of the SL trailer. The image of a fallout style FNAF game is priceless.
I feel like the “Elizabeth Survived” theory was just something we all collectively thought of at some point and decided to gaslight the rest of the fandom into thinking that it’s a real theory by someone who exists
I swear this is the first time I see "gaslighting" being used right here.
i mean it was probably game theory that made it
ok but now i want to get to the bottom of it lmao
as a young fnafer i tried gaslighting myself into thinking elizabeth survived because she was my favorite character 👀
I think somebody made a troll post and somebody took it seriously and it got spread around as a serious theory. the person who originally posted it must have deleted it.
I do admit i did think ballora might have been for older kids, her design was just soo different, she was slightly less cartoonish and cuddly compared to the plush cute characters from the other games
what older kids? 19 year olds?
If those bazoonkas I'd say she's more cuddly
None of the Sister Location animatronics are cuddly.
@@bluosom7585Bidybabs give it negative points
Mikevictim theory doesn't necessarily include the idea of older brother actually being William Afton.
YES! IT REALLY SOUNDS LIKE HE ONLY ADDED THIS TO MAKE THE THEORY MAKE SEEM MORE IMPROBABLE THEN IT IS!
then who is the older brother?
@@mari_zz John Afton, obviously.
@@g5studio21I wouldn’t blame him. I’m tired of MikeVictimers making the story much, much, more convoluted than it has to be.
@@mari_zz your mom?
Gotta love how people really tried to bring back the "nazi made robots" also people tried to say Michael was helping covering up the murders because of his speech after the custom night cutscene
You didn't mention that people thought that if you reversed the trailer, people thought you could hear suicide didn't work
Is that an actual theory?
It reminds me of the Mike kill all theory from fnaf 2
@@GalacticExplorer_Edits83 yes I heard it a few times
@@GalacticExplorer_Edits83 Ah yes, that one still makes me laugh. The fact that many hundreds of years ago, they secretly added obscure FNAF 2 lore in the song before Scott was even born.
@@JohnSapato lmao
adult theory hinging on the fact that ballora seems out of place is so silly because it is quite literally 3 different groups of animatronics/brands inside that rental bunker. the funtimes (as in, actual funtimes; foxy, freddy, chica, bonbon and bonnet [lolbit and yendo aswell]) the circus baby crew (baby, bidibabs and mystery springlock suit), and then the ballora crew (ballora, minireenas and whatever used to have the ennard mask if anything)
Ballora is specifically stated to be a distraction for the adults so that the other animatronics can take kids.
FNAF was always sci-fi. Advanced free roam animatronics connected to a criminal facial recognition database wirelessly, in the 80's? You just didn't notice it sooner because it was 'modern' tech in the 80s instead of slightly future tech in the 2020's.
an inability to account for realism does not determine genre
@@theopendooreveh pretty stupid reply you have there.
Can't wait for 5 spaceships at planet freddy's
Eh that’s just Advanced technology advanced technology doesn’t equal Sci-FI
I would like to see you do a video on FNAF World theories, it may not look like it but back then it sprung some wild ass theories
For me i used to think ennard was a seperate entity than the other animatronics and was always present and was mimicking baby the entire time, with baby being deactivated throughout the game. Why did i ever think this
that theory is so simple(ish?) on the surface but if i had a nickel for everytime ive seen it used to justify the hellhouse of Michael x Ennard I would be on a motherfucking yacht. Still convinced to this day it was the shippers who started this. Sorry for replying with a spew of dumb bullshit
i believed the same thing 1ce lmao
Wait...what actually happened, then
👁 👄 👁
@@swordinthestone313 stupid tldr: the SL animatronics fused into Ennard
@@swordinthestone313 ennard is an amalgamation of the four animatronics that didn't exist till night 5
The high piano keys at the end of the SL trailer still give me chills.
Also, I think the reason Ballora looks so different compared to the rest of the Funtimes is
because William made her to look like his wife. I don't really have any evidence to support it,
but it makes a little sense, right?
Why hello there, Old Sport!
4:55 That does exist! It's called Five Nights at Vault 5, but the original upload was taken down, so only reposts exist.
The weird thing about the “Michael isn’t William’s son” theory is that Michael literally says the animatronics thought he was his father. That’s kind of a dead giveaway
“father its me michael”
I saw the word "fazbunker" and immediately thought of the fact that that's what it's called when sister locations existence is explained in DSaF 3 lol
I saw another video on sister location theories before this and I gotta say adult theory’s gotta be one of the funniest fan theories ever 😭
I just binged watched all of this guy's fnaf videos. Can't wait for the "Stupid Security Breach theories" with "Glamrock Freddy is Mike?!"
It's not a stupid theory. Security Breach has the worst lore in the series, so obviously the theories of the game will also sound dumb.
Sister Location is definitely not the best game in the franchise; but I'll praise it only for adult theory, that shit still cracks me up.
thank god it wasnt AR though...
"father it's me, Michael" seems like you forgot to mention that cutscene
Actually the Mike victim theory has him being a robot and the real Michael died after the 83 bite
this theory exists now but it didn’t when the game came out
Don’t give Matpat any ideas
This... Somehow makes even less sense
@@salt_factory7566 That was MatPat's theory
5:25 you know seeing how Michael becomes purple after he gets scooped and replaced by ennard and how ennard did such a smooth way of luring and deceiving Michael it does leave the possibility that there were other Funtime animatronics (Funtime Bonnie and chica which would explain why we see Funtime chica in ultimate custom night posing showing off how she stole william’s physical body) that became their own ennard doing the same with William and michaels ennard taking the plan but doing it much more smoothly also this would explain why the “full Funtime deal” night in HW 2 has Funtime chica as it shows she was also present in the establishment
My little silly theory about the vampire show is that the William is the Vampire Dad, the baby vampire represents the actual Baby animatronic, and the Mom is the police/ Henry/ anyone who questions William regarding the Baby animatronic. Just like how the vampire denies being the father, Michael denies the ‘design choices’ he made with Baby.
These theories did two things:
1. Reminded me that some people are stupid
2. Melted me brain and triggered me so I fee like I need to go stare at puppies for an hour
"There are no references to previous games in sister location." ***Has the camera footage of the FNaF 4 house on screen as he says that***
I know it was sarcastic but I found it funny lmao
and he does mentioned that in the video
@@amirhaikal6672 yea I know lmao
I remember when sister location first came out I remember that I used to believe the Ennard is the true villain theory. 😂😂
2:34 Maybe the real older brother were the friends we made a long the way
The SHOCK i had from remembering adult theory
I absolutely love this series I have been hooked since the fist video! Great video as always.
2:59 well.......yeah, but i have only one question:.......WHO THE HELL THOUGHT THAT THE OLDER BRO IS WILLIAM? Like, seriously, the theory itself, with Michael being the Bite Victim, is not so bad as you say, and possibly still can be true(+we still NEVER had any 100% confirmation about which FNaF 4 boy is Michael. I even somewhere saw a theory that NONE of them both can be Michael, so he possibly can be just yet another, "fourth kid" and "third brother"). Only problem is.....again, WHERE THE HELL YOU GET THE SPECULATION ABOUT WILLIAM & OLDER BROTHER? I'm the fan since 2018, and i NEVER heard about this sh#t.
4:51 Five Nights at the Krusty Krab: Chapter 3 is set in a WW2 bomb shelter
I think dolly dimples still had a presence in the games, as the hippo. In fnaf 6 he was described to tell wild stories to the adults (I think)
Purple bad nah, lets make it the cool wires guy.
The apocalypse one would make for a goddam amazing spin-off especially if it sticks with Scott's roots(like Desolate Hope which SL clearly leans more to)
Whoever told Scott about Adult Theory was a sadist
dude there's absolutely no way you believed in the william innocent theory, it literally makes no sense
Took all the words out of my mouth at the beginning. I miss the FNAF I used to love.
Matpat popularised the theory of Michael being the cry child and was turned into a robot child after bite of 83 which is why he survived the scooping but matpat debunked this later himself
Yeah mostly thanks to a Fazbear fright story
FNAF 12: Elizabeth contracts stage 2 diabetes
I don't know if you were joking or not but incase you weren't with the Ennard is the killer theory, no. On Springtraps design you can see flesh. Oh, we don't see any wires other than those weird red things that wrap around some of his parts. AND if those somehow were his wires, why is there no wires on Springtraps legs? Like yeah they are on his ankles but not his legs. Forgot to mention, all of the wires I mentioned previously are fleshy looking. Now lets take a look at Scraptrap. Not much to say about him, but his voice is clearly that of a humans and not Ennards. Also Springtrap was burned in Fnaf 3, which led to Scraptraps design. Also, Scraptrap is missing a forearm. An animatronic would not lose their arm to a fire. But a human who has already been decayed? Also I forgot to mention again, Ennards voice is clearly different than from Aftons. So yeah I may have gone way too in depth about something probably satire but who cares.
Case closed.
There was an "Ennard was the killer" theory and it was dumb
I’m pretty sure he knows Ennard is not the killer
Can’t wait for a pizzeria simulator video! It’ll probably be not that long, but still long enough to be fun.
Not gonna lie that fallout shelter game idea sounds amazing.
0:17 Too true, man. Too true. In fact, I couldn't agree more!
The "Elizabeths Survives" theory reminds me how a few years ago my friend always rambled on about this theory that the originals were melted down to make the SL animatronics and they always told me everyone was talking about it and how true it was. I for 3 years of my life searched up and down for this theory.... It don't exist.
Accualy jt does exist i belive it is called molten mci theory
@@jakubgrono9070 I did a little research on that theory, you're correct. I'm gonna ask my friend if this was the theory they used to ramble on about because it does align with what they used to tell me lol. Thanks for the help!
@@Mayla_rp.10 no problem i'm glad i helped
You forgot that when Micheal got scooped, his body was literally decomposing. How could Ennard have controlled William for years?
he's da lean monster
Another great video love hearing about the crazy theories they made
2:12 he didn’t; he possessed his own corpse like William
the Scooper has a Remnant injector (FFPS blueprints)
When I was younger I was a diehard miketrap truther, thinking all the blood coming out of the spring bonnie suit was just… leftover pooled up blood that had just been sitting there all those years. I wasn’t too bright
There are two problems with the Ennard is the true killer theory. First, we see Ennard get lodged out of us in one cutscene, before we could supposedly die as Afton in the springlock suit (since we are not wearing it). And even then, we see that in fnaf 6 both William and Molten Freddy are two separate animatronics.
The theory existes before the cutscene of ennard leaving the mc's body happened
@@isauldron4337 Thanks for telling me. Have a nice day.
When it comes to Ballora in the adult theory, you could argue the same thing about Toy Chica from fnaf 2 because of her... features.
Did you made The Creatures Of Amphibia Tv Series Explained please?
3:18 I think Elizabeth is the girl in the center of the map playing with her toys
yeah i always thought that one looked more like elizabeth
Kinda funny that somebody made a FNAF fallout 4 mod, literally within 24 hours of you releasing this video
3:13 pretty sure we see Elizabeth in sister location tho you know when she get killed by baby. That sprite and the pigtail girl sprite are way to different from each other to be the same person
>That sprite and the pigtail girl sprite are way to different from each other to be the same person
What about FNAF 4 and FNAF SL Michael? :V
Orange Skinned dark dark brown hair man compared to a light brown pale man with an entirely different outfit?
Sprite differences between games don’t matter. Especially not in this series where there has literally been sprite differences within a single game (purple guy in FNAF 2 had 2 completely different sprites, and I’m pretty sure “Pink Guy” doesn’t exist).
@@ryanredd4552hair and eye color are almost always significant in the franchise (ignoring slight changes), especially in elizabeths case.
Great video. Excited for the pizza sim video!
2:12 If think about it, the theory kind of makes sense. Because the true reason William Afton killed the kids was to obtain their remnants and bring CC back from the dead. And that's what people think what happened. And obviously, the only reason he survived the scooper was because Baby gave him remanent after Ennard escaped Micheal's body. And there isn't real evidence that the older brother is William Afton.. Because.. Not once has anyone believed that as the theory. But mostly, people believe the other brother is someone different or just unrelated completely. But Scott so far made it look like CC was crying child.
I remember seeing a theory before Sister Location's release that the game would take place in a area under a Carousel of Progress/America Sings-style atttaction.
3:20 we literally know what Elizabeth looks like. We saw her get killed by Baby.
My theory is that ballora is blind because she cant open her eyelids
i am glad you are creative with your titles
ever since the movie released ive been really interesting in looking at the game timeline and seeing how we could manipulate it to how michael wouldnt be williams son (which is obviously not true, the game and movie are both completely different timelines its just impossible) but idk its kinda fun to find obscured and stupid reasons for it its kinda fun
what I find funny is the person who made adult theory is now technically working on an official fnaf game
Surviving the fazpocalypse in the fazbunker safe from the faznukes
5:32 Silver Eyes showed Afton survived one before whose to say it isn't possible to survive one in the games
Also we see "William" vommit out Ennard in a cutscene
That theory with William being the older brother is bc because, if we ignore William being present in fnaf 4, there is no way he could have been a young teenager in 1983 and a grown man four years later in 1987
I actually thought the ennard theory was kinda neat- obviously not real but it could have been an interesting twist if that had been plotted around! Maybe it’s a hot take, but I feel like Afton is really boring compared to his creations. We have nothing to go off of but the books for what he’s actually like, and the books aren’t too reliable in this case I don’t think. I really liked ennard and I didn’t care for his transition to being molten freddy and scrap baby
The pigtail theory is literally disproven in the 2D baby minigame, due to Baby having blue eyes before scooping Elizabeth. You called it the most believable, even though it's literally disproven with one minigame.
Yea but elizabeth have green eyes so i dont understand your point
You have yet to prove why what does that disprove lol
@nudlovec1966 "Pigtails and Green Eyes, just like Baby". Baby did not have green eyes until the scooping of Elizabeth. Also, Elizabeth in the minigame is BLONDE, while Pigtails Girl is ginger. Different Skin colors, Elizabeth's brighter than Pigtails girl. There is official art of Minigame Elizabeth, where's the drawings of Pigtail Girl?
Just because a character looks similar, doesn't mean they're the same, because of Remnant magic making thoughts into reality.
And now, please tell me at least ONE defining evidence that Pigtail Girl's actually the "Real Elizabeth" and not the one in the Baby Minigame, except "Well they have similar hair, and green eyes."
@@Truthisgone im just saying that pigtail girl and elizabeth have same eye color. Thats it. I dont believe that theory myself.
@@Truthisgonemike have 2 different type of skins in fnaf 4, so use sprite consistent doesnt count
Elizabeth Surviving And Michael Being The Crying Child
Could Be Interesting Ideas For The Movie
Noodle man being William explains why his skin gets darker
Theory confirmed 😎
I mean, the michael afton=crying child was what matpat thought for a bit until the books
Sister location could take place in a semi-alternate timeline. Sorta like the difference between Mobile Suit Gundam and its three compilation movies, or between MSG The Origin vs, ya know, Mobile Suit Gundam proper. The idea is that it would be a seperate timeline that's identical in most ways, but with slight differences, mainly aesthetics in this case. Basically, just an explaination for why the tech seemed to jump so drastically from advanced but still semi-realistic endoskeletons with basically fursuit exteriors to crazy high-tech cables and coils that are, iirc, able to combine with one another once extracted from their exteriors. Also a machine that could remove all human organs in seemingly one go, but leave the skin basically intact.
The idea isn't too complex; all prior FNAF games still take place more or less as written, with the biggest(if not only) changes being in aesthetic and technological level. Events remain unchanged in the broad and even some detailed strokes, with the biggest changes being aesthetics. Like if you put a sci-fi themed mod over Ocarina of Time without changing any of the mechanics or story
to be fair the weird scifi has always been kinda present, like in fnaf 2 the toy animatronics have facial recognition and shit
Can people even breathe helium? I don't think that works
U can for like two mins lol
Yes if you want to sound funny or to die
lmfao "Elizabeth survived" was a real theory? I remember making that a plot point of an AU. 💀
I used to love the Ennard is the real killer theory, it gave the series a fresh plot twist, too bad it was immediatly retconned with the release of Sister Location:Custom Night
thats not what retcon means
@@mingotproductions1335
Don't care
What even is Ennard is the real killer theory?
@@boredianz
Before Sister Location Custom Night there was no "Michael ejecting Ennard" minigame, so the ending was the bathroom scene where the player has purple eyes, this led many to believe that Purple Guy had been a robot in a human hide all the time.
The idea however was scratched or retconned with the release of Sister Location Custom Night, where the Springtrap cutscene and the aformentioned minigame tease PizzaSim and reveal that Michael was the one scooped by Ennard.
@@rodrigocoockiemonster4460 Retcon implies that something canonical was changed.
That implies that Scott LITERALLY Wrote William as being scooped by Ennard, in his own location by his own animatronics, and then 5 minutes later wrote it to be "Actually Michael got scooped, and William's just a killer", ignoring the deliberately designed murder robots before any scooping, with the intent of killing...
Charlie was Retconned from a He to a She.
This isnt a Retcon though, it just killed your headcanon :V
2:17
oh for fucks sake he did _not_ survive he possesed the left over metal skeleton after ennard ejected.
william did the same thing in the books.
Remember the toys had technology to make them have a criminal database
The bunker theory is so stupid, like it states that Michael is going to "come find his father," and thus, how would there be a nuclear fallout? Plus, we literally see Michael at Fazbear Frights in the post credits scene of Sister Location, so their evidence for the theory is not even possible
Why didn't you mention *shudder* Miketrap?
Do you know when the next explaining ghostbusters ghost will come out? I know a way to make the tv show easier
Ignoring contradictory evidence, I can understand why someone would come up with the Enard was the purple guy the whole time theory. When Michael gets scooped his skin turns purple as he decades and William as the purple guy has purple skin too. And the other time we see William, he had orange skin.
I mean, honestly, the illusion, this part kind of started in the silver eyes I think I did anyway or the twisted ones
You cover the crying child was Jesus theory