YuGiOh BAN LIST PREDICTION (December 2023)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ธ.ค. 2023
  • GET YOUR MAT: zerodamagegaming.com/collecti...
    GET YOUR BOX: zerodamagegaming.com/collecti...
    Investing in YuGiOh cards? Support the channel by using this link when doing so:
    bit.ly/2m2ElvX
    ACCESSORIES to store/grade cards: bit.ly/3j7igXL
    FRAMES FOR GRADED CARDS: bit.ly/3AEYYip
    I am no financial advisor. You are responsible for your own financial decisions.
    Everything said in these videos is my personal opinion, based on information I have available at the time of making the video.
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 109

  • @PipePlazaStudios
    @PipePlazaStudios 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I think a point worth considering for Phoenix Blade is that in Maze Of Millenia we're getting a replacement that is once per turn, Phoenixx Gearblade.

    • @TheOmniform
      @TheOmniform 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the "replacement" doesnt replace its use at all tho. different use is obv apparent for sure

  • @Charmander_R27
    @Charmander_R27 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Watching this after the banlist, your takes are probably the closest I've seen on TH-cam to reality.

  • @ShadowSaberBaroxio
    @ShadowSaberBaroxio 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Sharvara is the only archetypal handtrap that Unchained has. It plays into Triple Tactics Talent, because it can ONLY activate in the Main phase. YCS winner Joshua played practically his entire turn in the Battle Phase. I feel like Sharvara is the only thing keeping Unchained competitive. Any less than 2 makes it a trash deck, IMHO.

    • @lip124
      @lip124 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep its the ONLY card that makes the deck stand against meta deck, hitting makes no sense to me. When you look at the meta decks there is so many cards to hit, it is still a rogue deck.

    • @alduinodahviing8215
      @alduinodahviing8215 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If they want to hit Unchained, they should do it by hitting Tour Guide and Prosp.

  • @Billy_Wyatt
    @Billy_Wyatt 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pretty good predictions solemn, they all seem to be right on the spot.

  • @KashtiraFenrir
    @KashtiraFenrir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I think if they touch Fenrir, they will probably do it to two. It is mainly good for breaking boards or having a form of disruption, however for non-Kashtira decks, you are banking on drawing it in your opening hand, and having it at two will make that a lot more difficult, especially if Prosp gets hit. Pure Kashtira is in a good spot right now, and hitting it down to 0 or even 1 will hurt it, especially after the obvious prosp hit.
    Also if they touch it at all, I am hoping they will bring Unicorn to three. Fenrir is at two in Master Duel even with Arise Heart, and only Kashtira decks are mainly using it. In the OCG, it is completely banned only because of it's broken boss monster really.

    • @hector_here9790
      @hector_here9790 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do you think prosperity would be banned or limited?

    • @KashtiraFenrir
      @KashtiraFenrir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hector_here9790 In a game filled with one card starters, the card is just downright broken. You draw five/six in your hand, then you can dig six more cards deep. It will most def get limited to one just like in the OCG.

    • @giovannilawes9120
      @giovannilawes9120 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if there only putting fenrir at 2 then touching it is pointless. people are still going to play those 2. its great discard fodder and a good interruption. also it doesnt break boards lol. its FARR weaker thank pank

    • @KashtiraFenrir
      @KashtiraFenrir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@giovannilawes9120 It helps break boards because it forces your opponent to respond to it. It is worse than Pank, for sure, I never said it was better.
      Putting it to two is just to make it harder to draw it in your opening hand. Fenrir isn't even a problem card. In YCS Bologna out of the top 16 decks, only 3 had fenrir in it (One of which just had it in the sideboard). I say putting it at 2 is fair if it is really a problem for Konami.

  • @MasterForte
    @MasterForte 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would ban or limit neo space connector over aqua dolphin, as connector is more for link plays outside the archetype and modern neos decks dont really play it.

  • @lenvoor1633
    @lenvoor1633 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    *Yugitubers makes banlist prediction video*
    Konami: "I think we are forgetting something"

  • @WretchedPlebe
    @WretchedPlebe 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I really hope you're wrong about Sleepy Memory. It's the first real meta deck I've been able to own. TTT won't go to 1. They just reprinted it in the Rarity collection. But they did not reprint Thrust though. Big Welcome to 1 would smush Lab. Calamity was just re-released in RDA so doubt a ban.

    • @TheGreatDiegini
      @TheGreatDiegini 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro same

    • @alessandrobianchi645
      @alessandrobianchi645 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      only comment that makes sense. this is exactly how banlists work: not to "fix" the game, but to allow Konami to earn more money.

  • @MilfHunter42069
    @MilfHunter42069 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I JUST WANT SOME FUCKING ENDYMION SUPPORT!!!

    • @davide94extreme39
      @davide94extreme39 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      just bring back electrumite and fusion

  • @WShoup9818
    @WShoup9818 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My favorite shadoll card is wallow now. All seriousness I don't think Konami will do much especially in the bann department, limits and unhits will probably be this upcoming bann list. No deck is best deck and the format isn't solved, their are just so many contenders right now not even Konami will know what to truly hit other than consistency.

  • @Nazzyyyy
    @Nazzyyyy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video

  • @BanditGaming479
    @BanditGaming479 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for clarifying the point of a banlist. It’s not to balance the game it’s to make people stop playing older decks.

  • @user-jf6bq4kc7i
    @user-jf6bq4kc7i 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    will we ever recieve some yugi-boomer content from you like in good o'l days?

  • @jarom1144
    @jarom1144 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beatrice ban would be sad. But it does seem fair. I just like burning abyss. And even though they finally aren't good anymore it would likely destroy any future possibility if Beatrice is banned.

  • @aarondelgado6569
    @aarondelgado6569 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do we really need a ban list though

  • @PartyMarty321
    @PartyMarty321 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If Fenrir gets hit either to 1 or 2, they better bring back Unicorn to 3

  • @nicholasluciano6380
    @nicholasluciano6380 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All this labrynth hate and it’a never WON a YCS, floo recently won cancun and there’s 0 floo cards hit. It literally just frustrating to play against but has never been a dominant deck or the best deck. I don’t get it. If you want to ban toxic cards like D Barrier or Erad I’d understand but what did labrynth actually do to warrant hits to archetypal cards?

  • @grist836
    @grist836 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t think they will hit both prosp and talents on the same list tbh if they did hit talents I think they’d hit it to 2

  • @user-gm8ml9ii7c
    @user-gm8ml9ii7c 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yea you lost me at sharvara to 1 lol. Unchained is so fair and beatable it hardly deserves a hit

    • @solemnyugioh
      @solemnyugioh  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      never said it deserves that at all :) As said in the vid, this is what I -think- can happen. Not what I think -should- happen.

  • @Off_Screen
    @Off_Screen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    (vent)
    I'm honestly praying to the stars your right about prosp and triple tac getting hit...but not for the reasons you might expect. it's mainly for personal reasons. you see, im a budget barry and whenever i want to build a deck and ask advice from other players, the go to response i get for draw/search is "play prosp and triple tac". now to their credit, it's good advice because they are general busted cards, with that said, i generally cannot afford those cards due to my low budget.
    it's even worse nowadays because whenever i try to dispute this, the common response is "they were reprinted in rarity collection, of course you can buy them" and that was something i was considering...and then scalpers started bulk buying the reprints thus inflating the prices so that i can't afford them again (and ya'll wonder why people choose to play traps decks more these days. thank you pot of extrav) so in the end, when people suggest that, it comes off as naive at best and condescending at worse (they don't intend it that way to be clear so there is that atleast)
    maybe this is a financial me issue but at the end of the day, I guess Im just getting sick of being reminded of what's not financially available for me to make my deck better and i have no ill will towards the people who suggest those cards. they are only trying to help after all. I just hope one day i can find some cheaper alternatives to those cards without having to sell a kidney lol.
    anyways, thanks for coming to my ted talk.

    • @superraikou96
      @superraikou96 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those cards as cheap as shit now, like 6 dollars each

    • @Off_Screen
      @Off_Screen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I live in England. $-£ conversion works differently @@superraikou96

  • @liverusrock6789
    @liverusrock6789 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just Ban the Cooclock

  • @jdp3578
    @jdp3578 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What if Konami just made a list of illegal card combinations? If you have x card in your deck, you can't use y card.

    • @SuperMophie
      @SuperMophie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, similar to Duel Links banlist

  • @zithert
    @zithert 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Touch some other traps and not the main labrynth cards or only coclock to make people buy arias

  • @jacobwoodard818
    @jacobwoodard818 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't really see a reason to limit Shavara. I think banning Caesar and making people rely on the Darius/Machinex play to replace is a sufficient way to nerf Unchained without making them unable to function as at least a rouge deck. They need to take away Caesar because it makes it to easy to stop your opponent from making a board. They don't need to hit consistency and they can always bring Caesar back when they give d/d/d support again.

  • @lozdbzmario
    @lozdbzmario 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Centur-ion had 4 tops at bologna idk what you're talking about lmao

  • @oversupremacy5526
    @oversupremacy5526 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    12:58 Banning or limiting big welcome would kill the Deck

    • @momiji7308
      @momiji7308 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Good riddance

  • @ultimatechampion4830
    @ultimatechampion4830 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Prosperity semi

  • @deruneldembal5048
    @deruneldembal5048 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sleepy to 1 hurts a lot ans honestly wouldnt play purr anymore.

  • @Andrito3000
    @Andrito3000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The ones that we have in MD from this list are all URs and have 0 to none chance to be touched . Meta has to be in danger of nuclear meltdown for MD to do something about UR card. 🤭🤭

  • @internet-nao-da-dinheiro6598
    @internet-nao-da-dinheiro6598 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Return Dragon Ruler Please 😅

  • @alpha34098
    @alpha34098 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Hitting Sleepy Memory to 1 does not make any sense since you don't want to kill Purrely at this point in time. And that's what putting both Sleepy (Because of OCG) and Delicious (Because of TCG) did in Worlds. The reason for that is pretty obvious: We don't have a direct searcher for the Memories that isn't RNG based (My Friend Purely is RNG based, remember) and if there's something that is pretty much disliked by players in any card game is having to rely heavily on RNG to do something
    Banning Kelbek and Agido might kill Tearlaments (as the deck is so undeservingly butchered that they're become too dependent of a bunch of cards that are not even part of a archetype to basically be something) but will prove a point: The Ishizu Cards, from the offset, were so overtuned that they should have never existed to begin with and the cards deserved to be hit the most in the February 2023 banlist. If the Ishizu cards never existed in TCG, Tearlaments would've been hit so differently in that banlist (Kitkallos, Planet and Merlli to 1 and both Havnis and Scheiren to 2) rather than the butcher's list we got in the TCG specially considering that Kashtira was going to be Full Power weeks later, which would cause Tearlaments to fade into the lower tiers since, while playable, would not be able to compete well against Arise-Heart

    • @WretchedPlebe
      @WretchedPlebe 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is "RNG"? Fairly new to the game. Thanks

    • @jasonmaiorano148
      @jasonmaiorano148 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      randomic number generecion, aka, luck@@WretchedPlebe

    • @alpha34098
      @alpha34098 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WretchedPlebe Random Number Generation

  • @Junglewarfare
    @Junglewarfare 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "I am not saying these hits should happen. I am saying they will."
    Do you have no conviction?

    • @solemnyugioh
      @solemnyugioh  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, I just HEAVILY disagree with how Konami handles ban lists. I despise how often they are used for selling product instead of balancing the game. I made this very clear in the video. Hence why I don’t believe such hits should happen. I fundamentally disagree with why they would.

  • @AusCleric
    @AusCleric 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Surely harp horror comes back definitely not sniffing copium

    • @user-rk6sj3ht4m
      @user-rk6sj3ht4m 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will when they reveal new orcust cards

  • @arrownoir
    @arrownoir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isolde whored herself out for the last time.

  • @jeremy91574
    @jeremy91574 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think that at some point, we have to stop revolving around the Isolde problem by banning other cards that didn't ask anyone for anything...
    Isolde has already proven how stupid the card is and does everything in combo decks, she's the real problem.
    We saw it several time the power of this card, even in Jeffrey's Exodia deck, whose entire combo started from this simple card, and even in combo decks that are not essentialy Warrior monsters...
    I would be in favor of banishing it, and seeing how Infernoble can do without

  • @GLX.
    @GLX. 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isolde is dead so sad…

  • @scootlou1178
    @scootlou1178 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    big should never get hit you should hit staples the deck use

    • @scootlou1178
      @scootlou1178 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i play lab and i no the deck is not use far wen it lost to a duster and a ash

  • @jumpiestaman100
    @jumpiestaman100 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Isolde ban or limit can see, because it really enables some decks to extend for largely untouchable boards (mainly infernobles).
    Tearlaments I think is fine. It's random, praying you mill decently well. I think it's honestly fine as is.
    Pot of Prosperity ban makes 0 sense, because after having just gotten it affordable, you ban it and now kill off a lot of the casual players who were missing this for their decks. I think Prosperity to 1 is honestly fine.
    Purrely with a hit to Sleepy should be good enough.
    Unchained is weird. I guess Shavara hit is the good one, but not sure here.
    Runick hitting Tip to 1 would be good. Fountain at 1 would just outright kill the deck anyways, but Tip to 1 hurts, as you said, consistency.
    Triple Tactics Talents should just be outright banned. Draw 2 (going +1), hand knowledge, or a non-targetting change of heart. That's way way way too strong.
    I love Kashtira, but Fenrir being hit is inevitable. Fenrir to 2 is significant, though the likely hit is to 1.
    And Labrynth just needs furniture hits to 1. If not that, either a Big Welcome or a Welcome Labrynth hit is necessary (semi on both would help).

    • @lip124
      @lip124 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Super heavy samurai support is not too far away, I guessing people forgot about that

  • @MikeMaragni
    @MikeMaragni 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Purrely could've been such a cool deck if the goal was anything other than a towers piece of crap... Im so sad :(

  • @alexandergeorgiev74
    @alexandergeorgiev74 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dude 😎 really 🤣 phenix blade that's a ocg type of ban ain't gonna happen in tcg

    • @fabianbeteta5795
      @fabianbeteta5795 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It that happens, and the Phoenix blade gets banned, we will get the Phoenix gearblade next year.

  • @ashleymaple16
    @ashleymaple16 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just ban all the tear cards job done they done it to dragon rulers back in the day

  • @triple_gem_shining
    @triple_gem_shining 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ban

  • @lip124
    @lip124 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Unchained Shavara not sure about that. As a unchained player it is still a rogue deck, NObody was playing the deck so I doubt its going to be hit.

    • @lordsupernewton8888
      @lordsupernewton8888 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unchained is no longer a rogue deck. You tripping.

    • @lip124
      @lip124 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lordsupernewton8888 who is saying it's no longer a rogue deck? Are you reading correctly.

    • @lordsupernewton8888
      @lordsupernewton8888 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lip124 that’s what you wrote
      As an unchained player it is still a rogue deck - that’s your exact words

  • @Ricozaza
    @Ricozaza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Hitting big welcome will kill the deck. If you want a real hit that isn’t just furniture it would be Arianna to 2

    • @JcTiger68
      @JcTiger68 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      "Back in my day cooclock was at 3..."

    • @ayh4968
      @ayh4968 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      arianna to 2 is not a real hit

    • @DsVKayy999
      @DsVKayy999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ayh4968literally.

    • @Ricozaza
      @Ricozaza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JcTiger68 ill be fine with clock at 1. I only play one because two starting hand is kinda brick

    • @Ricozaza
      @Ricozaza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ayh4968 Arianna searches for any lab card and can make plays with summoning lady and having big welcome in graveyard

  • @Nerfneros
    @Nerfneros 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Artifact scythe is banned in the tcg

    • @solemnyugioh
      @solemnyugioh  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Damn that's crazy, anyway effect Mayakashi trap, response?

  • @chrissabdulmasih7703
    @chrissabdulmasih7703 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope sleepy and tour guide getting limited it will kill the deck

  • @harryc657
    @harryc657 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would love for the clock in lybriath to be banned.
    I'm sorry, you shouldn't be able to activate traps that leads to handloops and flood gates on the very first turn.

  • @dyntex2825
    @dyntex2825 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Put fenrir to 1, put pot or max c to 1, bring called by to 2, bring time seal t9 2, instant fusion to 1, ban runic fountain. And limit Evenly

    • @dwight7124
      @dwight7124 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha cope harder

  • @mornhiver
    @mornhiver 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    free harp

  • @SoloQueueGamer
    @SoloQueueGamer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I only wish for kashtira Fenrir to be banned or at least lim't to 1.

  • @mr.6934
    @mr.6934 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hitting calamity would be a huge mistake considering the fact that a lot of non meta synchro decks need this card to play against these extremely broken boards currently in the meta. They should just nerf broken decks to not being able to summon it that easy

  • @757gamerguy2
    @757gamerguy2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ban harpies feather storm.
    But give us back Barrier Statue :)

  • @alexandergeorgiev74
    @alexandergeorgiev74 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fenrir should be banned it searches even Fenrir lol 😂

    • @JustIzzan
      @JustIzzan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah when every other deck can use this card you know it's a broken card bruhh

  • @hankmccoy6742
    @hankmccoy6742 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ban droll and lock bird.