Had he not done that I wouldn't have come out of zombie mode and and actually soaked in the information he was delivering. This video would have came on and gone off. I was for sure listening to the words leading up to "That's bullshit"... But they were going in one ear and out the other for some reason. Then, I guess I figured this guy ain't fucking around. Let's get it.
Thanks for the comprehensive breakdown, I like your take on shutter speed and shutter angle. No need to follow the older film logic when our camera's have so much flexibility.
I watched your in depth A7s review, and now you're back with more awesome info. You're well on your way to becoming a huge resource for online video knowledge!
This is the exact information that I was searching for for years, but all that is available is the status quo of 2x the frame rate. I new there are more ways to shoot 24p and 30p. I've been shooting 1/40 to 1/250 shutter for years, and couldn't figure out why it works. But now I know thanks to you and this video. Thank you wolfcrow.
Key take away in understanding the relationship between shutter speed and fps in regards to video/film: "btw motion blur is nothing but still image blur that you get for keeping the shutter open that long. If you want less blur, you have to have faster shutter speed, and if you want more blur, you keep the shutter open longer." This is more so true for electronic shutters but it's kinda hard to understand the combination of FPS and shutter speed unless you think of each frame as a still image...then the corresponding shutter speed (per frame) startings making sense. It took me an entire day to thoroughly understand this concept. Absolutely brilliant video, thanks Wolfcrow!
Probably one of the most intelligent and well thought out explanations viewed on this subject. The visuals and demos such as rolling shutter made perfect sense. And the 1/3 stop up or down was of help to keep that feel. Subscribed. Liked. Thanks.
Auto-slow shutter on the sony camera's just repeats frames. So if your shooting at 24p and you set it to 1/4", it will repeat that 1/4" frame 6 times. I think the only time you would ever want to use this is if you are shooting totally in the dark and would rather have really juttery motion instead of nothing. Hope that helps.
if the shutter speed has been set bigger than "1/frame rate" the ONLY way for the camera to compensate that is ignoring the frame rate setting, not repeating the frames...repeating frames is only for display devices not recording sensor and it only happens when your recorded frame rate and display frame rate don't match ...so in this case if we set the camera to 24 fps and 1/4 shutter speed, the camera will ignore the 24 fps and record a 4 fps video at 1/4 shutter speed and then remap the time/speed of the video to 6 times faster to reach that 24 fps....
I really appreciate your level of understanding of photo / video tools and tech. As well, the manner by which you can explain it is some of the best I've experienced. Thank you so much for sharing. It reeeeeeally helps.
This is great. Just picked up a used Canon C100 mk ii and noticed Shutter angle as one of the options. Was aware of Shutter speed and 24p, but you made it very clear. I was also under the belief that you need the shutter speed to be 2x the frame rate for film look, but doesnt always need to be. Thanks
Excellent review of a basic, yet, fundamental, topic. I enjoyed the thorough comparison of the different speeds as well as the example provided via the split screen of the pendulum filmed at different shutter speeds. it was a good way to visualize the cause and effect relationship between shutter speeds and frame rates.
Thank you so much for this video. I knew about the shutter to FPS rule but I've seen images on film sets where they have the shutter at 180. I always wondered why that was since I never knew the difference between shutter speed and shutter angle. Tha k you for explaining it in this video. 😊👍🏼
This is the best video I’ve found yet on this topic. I especially appreciate the acknowledgment that a shooter may not want the film look and that’s ok.
finally someone calls out the bullshit about 24p. most of these youtubers just copy and repeat what they see on youtube (ironically). 24fps is far inferior format for modern digital content.
Very useful and informative.Thank you for taking the time out to show us the different techniques. Absolutely brilliant and helpful! Thank you very much!
Im a self taught video enthusiast and youtube obviously was my main reference to a lot of info, unfortunately in too many links when they talk about “how to set your camera for video shooting” they always mention “the shutter speed should be double your frame rate”. It only needed an additional “IF you are seeking the film look”.
"in some films, the pan is fast, and this bothers you" *queue Wes Anderson montage* 😂😂😂 great video, lots of useful information. Shutter speed as style, I like it! p.s. in video games, I can't "notice" the diff between 60fps and 120fps, but it's perceptible at some level when you have great ping and it's fast-trigger stuff (Rocket League, FPS games) 70-90fps for the human eye, seems about right
I'd love to see a video describing the relationship and difference between frame rate and shutter speed in DSLR video. I believe I understand it fairly well but not fully.
This video is excellent, thanks for sharing. I've done heaps of tests and found I prefer to shoot 60fps @ 360˚ shutter. It's looks silky smooth and is a pleasure to watch. And has similar motion blur to 24fps.
I'm a photographer just beginning to learn video. No many resources out there conflate shutter angle with shutter speed because they assume a particular project framerate. That's been very confusing for me. This video laid a lot of my anxieties to rest. I'm feeling much freer to experiment now. One small critique that goes for most explanations: no one ever explains "the film look" other than "it's what we're used to seeing in the cinema." As a guy who doesn't go to the cinema and doesn't even watch a bunch of movies at home, this is particularly unhelpful.
This was most excellent and I'm so happy to hear someone finally say that 24p is the correct setting to look natural. It is total BS and the only reason 24p is a standard is because it was cheaper to shoot than 30fps because there was less actual footage to use and develop. That became a standard in the way that 8x10 images are still standard in a world that shoots at 4x6 images. 8x10 is left over from the days of glass negatives and wooden box cameras.
There is one more thing to consider/discuss - the juddering that happens on LCDs. In the time of analog displays you didn't see the whole frame at a time, instead every pixel was highlighted only once per frame and then it faded out while the beam was highlighting other pixels. When LCDs were brought in to the market, it turned out that video on analog TVs appeared smoother than when being played on LCDs. I'm not expert in psychology and can't explain this, but it is the fact that 24fps on a flickering display looks much smoother than on a non-flickering display. I guess it is because when you see the same frame for the 1/24 of second the brain considers any movement as harsh (the object stays on the same place and then jumps to the new place immediately), but when the display flickers you see a frame much less than for the 1/24 of second, so the brain guess the predicted position of the object and considers the movement as smooth. So, if you shot at 24fps at a really fast shutter speed (so that every frame is as crisp as possible) you will end up with juddering on moving objects unless you play it on an analog display (or on a display that simulates the flickering like the modern 400Hz LCDs or plasmas do). And to compensate this juddering you have to use shutter angles more than 180 (I guess the 360 will work the best, but will give too much blur).
WHy no one else talks this stuff. I do not understand all these channels yet why they do not teach something so important. Even I was a victim of these harsh rules. Yet today I did a home video at 60 shutter 24 frame and no one was none the wiser.
You seem like the right person to ask. If using the so called 180 degree rule, if you were filming at 30fps, a shutter speed of 60 is 180 deg. What if you used a shutter speed of 120? Wouldn't that be the same as 180 deg? But you explained well that it is a shutter speed of 50 that gives the well known motion blur.
Great video. I would add though that adjusting the shutter speed simply to control exposure is maybe not really the right approach. Unfortunately, too many videographers are unaware of neutral-density filters and don't use them which leads to making decisions that often lead to a video look at the end. Unless I have a specific and justifiable reason to change my shutter angle, I almost always go to my ND filter to control the exposure, even in indoor situations! I also rarely change the ISO (I leave it on the native ISO of 800 on my Ursa Mini Pro 4.6K or 400 (3200 in low light) on my Pocket Cinema Camera 4K. Using NDs enables me to control the exposure at any aperture setting.
You are fantastic. I recently shot a video with a 4k digital camera which gives out 1920x720image video, pixel and true motion, frame speed ,true colours and proper skin tones. I shot it like a film and got the film look. I edited it and got the master in HD.mp4. I did not go for colour correction as I had the correct colours and tone for indoor and outdoors, even when I mixed outdoor natural sunlight and indoor shot say of a visitor outside the main door seen from inside the room or the visitor outside room ,the colour of character skin tones,costume and objects remained exactly. I watched the movie on the laptop monitor,mobile screen and then on the TV monitor and I did not have any problems of colour variations or motion affected. I converted it to H.264 as a screener copy, still it remained intact in terms of colour ,tone,motion and skin tones. I only hope it will reproduce the same when projected on a large movie screen. I truly want to know what you have to say. I have been immensely enjoying your advice and certainly appreciate your approach. Please comment. Yes,I used digital camera called Open Camera and edited 1/30 FPS, ( I did not wish to risk editing at 1/24 FPS for fear of pace loss ) using a low end editing app called Art Director. I wonder if it will stand the test of a festival projection. Keeping fingers crossed. I think it is cinematic 100 percent in all respects .I just did not have access to professional gears due to covid-19 renters were closed and I wanted to shoot this script ,one actor playing two characters and opposites.- speaking,reacting ,body gestures,body movement ,oh everything life-like normal. . No all effects, faces and cuts plus titles including one s/I, maintitle spin and into the first shot till the last for 7':32".
Great explanation! I have a few questions. 1. When we boot the frame rate but keep the same shutter angle, would the motion blur look the same? 2.My guess is- it is the same motion blur theoretically, but it depends on if the frame rate is higher or lower than the human eye framerates? Like we can't tell the differences when game fps is higher than 120. 3. Is there any theory about the human eye shutter speed? I don't know if my first two questions are related to human eye shutter speed? 4.I the article you mentioned, "In fact, movies shot on 24 fps are usually projected at 48 fps or 72 fps." I don't understand how would that work. By showing the same frames from the 24fps footage two or three times per 1/24s in order to project at a 48 or 72 fps?
I honestly like shooting more on 25p rather than 24p. It's virtually indistinguishable to the naked eye (especially on youtube) and with 1/50 shutter it's great for flicker reduction
Regarding what the eye sees: You lump together two separate claims. One is that the eye sees closer to 24fps. The other is that the eye sees motion blur comparable to a 1/50th shutter. Your rebuttal conflates frame rate and shutter speed, but only addresses the frame-rate question. And obviously the eye sees more than 24fps, otherwise we wouldn't be able to see the difference between 24fps and 30fps or 60 or 120. And also, the claim I've heard made is not that the eye sees in 24fps or with the blur of 1/50th shutter. But rather, that the eye sees motion blur comparable to what is produced by following the 180 degree rule. Our eyes have a 'frame rate' higher than 24fps, so we don't see motion blur of a 1/48th or 1/50th shutter.
Sony cameras don't actually shoot with shutter open across many frames, they just drop the frame rate... (but still encode to the set frame rate in the codec)
First, thank you for laying this out so clearly. Big help! There is only place where I got stuck ... At 2:50, you have a graphic that says, "When shooting at 24p: Have the shutter speed at 1/50s (or 1/48s); Have the shutter angle at 180 degrees (or 172.8 degrees). This implies 1/50s = 180 degrees and 1/48s = 172.8 degrees. Seems backwards. For 24p, it should be stated in a way that makes 1/48s correspond to 180 degrees. Right? This is kind of hard the first time through so I may just be confused.
Sir one question has appeared in my mind sometime. In the purpose of Videography on DSLR Camera, which criteria should i follow everytime if my FPS setting is 25p. 1. I should take videography in auto mode only. 2. Should follow manual mode and Shutter Speed should maintain 1/50 where Aparture 5.6/Other. 3. Should follow Shutter Speed priority mode with 1/50. Which is best setting?
This is a great explanation, but I feel like it is hamstrung by the fact that TH-cam is only showing it at 25FPS. It shows the difference in blur correctly, but doesn't convey the sense of smooth movement that something playing back at 60FPS+ would show (such as in the sports/video games section). Is there perhaps another copy of this hosted somewhere else?
If you want to shoot for slow motion, should you then use a higher FPS say 60/120/240 etc OR just use a faster shutter speed/lower shutter angle(if using video cameras) while using 24 FPS? If we use higher FPS, then we would HAVE to use the 180 degree rule, don't we? Coz if we don't, won't the footage not be clean enough when the footage is interpreted on a 24 FPS timeline in editing software?
it very useful video ever I seen about shutter angle, but one doubt is not cleared yet " some sony cameras have low shutter speed (below 10) when filming'
And if I am shooting in 60fps just to make slow-motion in some parts, but in others the speed will be normal and the video will be rendered in 24fps? Which shutter speed should I use, 1/48 or 1/120?
How to Make a Movie | The Complete Blueprint th-cam.com/video/-j3DgDJgTUo/w-d-xo.html
From now on,
Please Add the subtitles ...please...
It will be easier for all country people to understand what are you speaking....
favorite line at 9:38! lol, he's so calm and professional the whole time then suddenly breaks out with: "That's bullshit, fortunately!" lmao
Had he not done that I wouldn't have come out of zombie mode and and actually soaked in the information he was delivering. This video would have came on and gone off. I was for sure listening to the words leading up to "That's bullshit"... But they were going in one ear and out the other for some reason. Then, I guess I figured this guy ain't fucking around. Let's get it.
I love that!
I had the same reaction when I heard that. "Who the F would think that was true...? Why would we have 120hz monitors if that was true??"
Ive looked and this is ABSOLUTELY the best explanation of angle and shutter speed. Way to go.
That actually was eye opening. I completely forgot that shutter speed changes the quality of movement. Thank you very much!!
You're welcome!
Your style of teaching is so simple and easy to follow for beginners like us, thanks a lot.
Thanks for the comprehensive breakdown, I like your take on shutter speed and shutter angle.
No need to follow the older film logic when our camera's have so much flexibility.
You're welcome!
I watched your in depth A7s review, and now you're back with more awesome info. You're well on your way to becoming a huge resource for online video knowledge!
Thanks!
I discovered this channel only recently but i am already in love. Absolutely great content
This is the exact information that I was searching for for years, but all that is available is the status quo of 2x the frame rate. I new there are more ways to shoot 24p and 30p. I've been shooting 1/40 to 1/250 shutter for years, and couldn't figure out why it works. But now I know thanks to you and this video. Thank you wolfcrow.
Key take away in understanding the relationship between shutter speed and fps in regards to video/film:
"btw motion blur is nothing but still image blur that you get for keeping the shutter open that long. If you want less blur, you have to have faster shutter speed, and if you want more blur, you keep the shutter open longer."
This is more so true for electronic shutters but it's kinda hard to understand the combination of FPS and shutter speed unless you think of each frame as a still image...then the corresponding shutter speed (per frame) startings making sense. It took me an entire day to thoroughly understand this concept.
Absolutely brilliant video, thanks Wolfcrow!
I'm just a beginner and it's hard for me to fairy express how your content is great and helpful, so I just say thank you.
Probably one of the most intelligent and well thought out explanations viewed on this subject. The visuals and demos such as rolling shutter made perfect sense. And the 1/3 stop up or down was of help to keep that feel. Subscribed. Liked. Thanks.
You're welcome!
i agree with your point that you can adjust shutter speed, within reason, to accommodate exposure issues. Great piece, thanks
You're welcome!
"...I'll try to explain as simply as I can..."
Mission accomplished. Thumbs up!
Auto-slow shutter on the sony camera's just repeats frames. So if your shooting at 24p and you set it to 1/4", it will repeat that 1/4" frame 6 times. I think the only time you would ever want to use this is if you are shooting totally in the dark and would rather have really juttery motion instead of nothing. Hope that helps.
if the shutter speed has been set bigger than "1/frame rate" the ONLY way for the camera to compensate that is ignoring the frame rate setting, not repeating the frames...repeating frames is only for display devices not recording sensor and it only happens when your recorded frame rate and display frame rate don't match ...so in this case if we set the camera to 24 fps and 1/4 shutter speed, the camera will ignore the 24 fps and record a 4 fps video at 1/4 shutter speed and then remap the time/speed of the video to 6 times faster to reach that 24 fps....
I really appreciate your level of understanding of photo / video tools and tech. As well, the manner by which you can explain it is some of the best I've experienced. Thank you so much for sharing. It reeeeeeally helps.
The Bunn You're welcome!
This is great. Just picked up a used Canon C100 mk ii and noticed Shutter angle as one of the options. Was aware of Shutter speed and 24p, but you made it very clear. I was also under the belief that you need the shutter speed to be 2x the frame rate for film look, but doesnt always need to be. Thanks
You deserve so much more subscribers, your content is great!
Thanks!
Excellent review of a basic, yet, fundamental, topic.
I enjoyed the thorough comparison of the different speeds as well as the example provided via the split screen of the pendulum filmed at different shutter speeds. it was a good way to visualize the cause and effect relationship between shutter speeds and frame rates.
Thank you!
Sareesh is a great filmmaker and a great teacher...
You cleared so much confusions floating around the internet!!!
Thank you so much for this video. I knew about the shutter to FPS rule but I've seen images on film sets where they have the shutter at 180. I always wondered why that was since I never knew the difference between shutter speed and shutter angle. Tha k you for explaining it in this video. 😊👍🏼
This is the best video I’ve found yet on this topic. I especially appreciate the acknowledgment that a shooter may not want the film look and that’s ok.
finally someone calls out the bullshit about 24p. most of these youtubers just copy and repeat what they see on youtube (ironically). 24fps is far inferior format for modern digital content.
Very useful and informative.Thank you for taking the time out to show us the different techniques. Absolutely brilliant and helpful! Thank you very much!
You're welcome!
Im a self taught video enthusiast and youtube obviously was my main reference to a lot of info, unfortunately in too many links when they talk about “how to set your camera for video shooting” they always mention “the shutter speed should be double your frame rate”. It only needed an additional “IF you are seeking the film look”.
You deserve more subscribers.... I'm shocked why this channel is so underrated! Very accurate.
Thank you very much! This is exactly the kind of thorough and clear explanation I've been looking for.
And that's why lighting is crucial
Your videos are like packed. No nonsense. Really love those!!
"in some films, the pan is fast, and this bothers you" *queue Wes Anderson montage*
😂😂😂
great video, lots of useful information. Shutter speed as style, I like it!
p.s. in video games, I can't "notice" the diff between 60fps and 120fps, but it's perceptible at some level when you have great ping and it's fast-trigger stuff (Rocket League, FPS games) 70-90fps for the human eye, seems about right
Even the best panning is something that should be used sparingly.
gosh, i love your series! thank you for taking time off and keep up the good work!
You're welcome!
I'd love to see a video describing the relationship and difference between frame rate and shutter speed in DSLR video. I believe I understand it fairly well but not fully.
Well done sir. This is the clearest explanation about such subject
This video is excellent, thanks for sharing. I've done heaps of tests and found I prefer to shoot 60fps @ 360˚ shutter. It's looks silky smooth and is a pleasure to watch. And has similar motion blur to 24fps.
I like 60 fps too.
I'm a photographer just beginning to learn video. No many resources out there conflate shutter angle with shutter speed because they assume a particular project framerate. That's been very confusing for me.
This video laid a lot of my anxieties to rest. I'm feeling much freer to experiment now.
One small critique that goes for most explanations: no one ever explains "the film look" other than "it's what we're used to seeing in the cinema." As a guy who doesn't go to the cinema and doesn't even watch a bunch of movies at home, this is particularly unhelpful.
Content and content clarity of this video are excellent. Many thanks.
This was most excellent and I'm so happy to hear someone finally say that 24p is the correct setting to look natural. It is total BS and the only reason 24p is a standard is because it was cheaper to shoot than 30fps because there was less actual footage to use and develop. That became a standard in the way that 8x10 images are still standard in a world that shoots at 4x6 images. 8x10 is left over from the days of glass negatives and wooden box cameras.
There is one more thing to consider/discuss - the juddering that happens on LCDs.
In the time of analog displays you didn't see the whole frame at a time, instead every pixel was highlighted only once per frame and then it faded out while the beam was highlighting other pixels.
When LCDs were brought in to the market, it turned out that video on analog TVs appeared smoother than when being played on LCDs. I'm not expert in psychology and can't explain this, but it is the fact that 24fps on a flickering display looks much smoother than on a non-flickering display. I guess it is because when you see the same frame for the 1/24 of second the brain considers any movement as harsh (the object stays on the same place and then jumps to the new place immediately), but when the display flickers you see a frame much less than for the 1/24 of second, so the brain guess the predicted position of the object and considers the movement as smooth.
So, if you shot at 24fps at a really fast shutter speed (so that every frame is as crisp as possible) you will end up with juddering on moving objects unless you play it on an analog display (or on a display that simulates the flickering like the modern 400Hz LCDs or plasmas do). And to compensate this juddering you have to use shutter angles more than 180 (I guess the 360 will work the best, but will give too much blur).
I've been searching for this info a long time - Thank you for the in depth explanation!
You're welcome!
WHy no one else talks this stuff. I do not understand all these channels yet why they do not teach something so important. Even I was a victim of these harsh rules. Yet today I did a home video at 60 shutter 24 frame and no one was none the wiser.
You seem like the right person to ask. If using the so called 180 degree rule, if you were filming at 30fps, a shutter speed of 60 is 180 deg. What if you used a shutter speed of 120? Wouldn't that be the same as 180 deg? But you explained well that it is a shutter speed of 50 that gives the well known motion blur.
I liked when you said "thats bullshit" :D Thanks for breaking it down.
You're welcome!
Great video. I would add though that adjusting the shutter speed simply to control exposure is maybe not really the right approach. Unfortunately, too many videographers are unaware of neutral-density filters and don't use them which leads to making decisions that often lead to a video look at the end. Unless I have a specific and justifiable reason to change my shutter angle, I almost always go to my ND filter to control the exposure, even in indoor situations! I also rarely change the ISO (I leave it on the native ISO of 800 on my Ursa Mini Pro 4.6K or 400 (3200 in low light) on my Pocket Cinema Camera 4K. Using NDs enables me to control the exposure at any aperture setting.
This is the best video about shutter speed I've found! Thank you! Just Subscribed.
You're welcome!
Great vid. "My bachelor physics" slow mind finally gets it. Thanks man!
You're welcome!
You are fantastic. I recently shot a video with a 4k digital camera which gives out 1920x720image video, pixel and true motion, frame speed ,true colours and proper skin tones. I shot it like a film and got the film look. I edited it and got the master in HD.mp4. I did not go for colour correction as I had the correct colours and tone for indoor and outdoors, even when I mixed outdoor natural sunlight and indoor shot say of a visitor outside the main door seen from inside the room or the visitor outside room ,the colour of character skin tones,costume and objects remained exactly. I watched the movie on the laptop monitor,mobile screen and then on the TV monitor and I did not have any problems of colour variations or motion affected. I converted it to H.264 as a screener copy, still it remained intact in terms of colour ,tone,motion and skin tones. I only hope it will reproduce the same when projected on a large movie screen. I truly want to know what you have to say. I have been immensely enjoying your advice and certainly appreciate your approach. Please comment. Yes,I used digital camera called Open Camera and edited 1/30 FPS, ( I did not wish to risk editing at 1/24 FPS for fear of pace loss ) using a low end editing app called Art Director. I wonder if it will stand the test of a festival projection. Keeping fingers crossed. I think it is cinematic 100 percent in all respects .I just did not have access to professional gears due to covid-19 renters were closed and I wanted to shoot this script ,one actor playing two characters and opposites.- speaking,reacting ,body gestures,body movement ,oh everything life-like normal. . No all effects, faces and cuts plus titles including one s/I, maintitle spin and into the first shot till the last for 7':32".
Great explanation! I have a few questions.
1. When we boot the frame rate but keep the same shutter angle, would the motion blur look the same?
2.My guess is- it is the same motion blur theoretically, but it depends on if the frame rate is higher or lower than the human eye framerates? Like we can't tell the differences when game fps is higher than 120.
3. Is there any theory about the human eye shutter speed? I don't know if my first two questions are related to human eye shutter speed?
4.I the article you mentioned, "In fact, movies shot on 24 fps are usually projected at 48 fps or 72 fps." I don't understand how would that work. By showing the same frames from the 24fps footage two or three times per 1/24s in order to project at a 48 or 72 fps?
I honestly like shooting more on 25p rather than 24p. It's virtually indistinguishable to the naked eye (especially on youtube) and with 1/50 shutter it's great for flicker reduction
I only shoot at 25fps. I believe there was (is?) an attempt to standardize the frame rate to 25p instead of 23.976.
wolfcrow good to hear. I like round numbers
This is such a valuable video, thank you so much for sharing this. I understood everything.
The best explanation of this topic on youtube!
Thank you!
Great explanation, thanks for that! I'm mostly a photo guy, but doing more video work lately. Keep up the helpful videos!
You're welcome!
Fantastic explanation. Thank you so much for sharing.
15:36 onwards:) Yuss I love this attitude!!!!
Excellent explanation and a reference about 'how things work'. Regards and thank you.
Great description with examples. Best I've seen. 😊👍
you are a natural at explaining. thank you! thumbed up
You're welcome!
Wow, this is an amazing video. Excellent, keep them coming!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you!
Regarding what the eye sees: You lump together two separate claims.
One is that the eye sees closer to 24fps.
The other is that the eye sees motion blur comparable to a 1/50th shutter.
Your rebuttal conflates frame rate and shutter speed, but only addresses the frame-rate question. And obviously the eye sees more than 24fps, otherwise we wouldn't be able to see the difference between 24fps and 30fps or 60 or 120.
And also, the claim I've heard made is not that the eye sees in 24fps or with the blur of 1/50th shutter. But rather, that the eye sees motion blur comparable to what is produced by following the 180 degree rule. Our eyes have a 'frame rate' higher than 24fps, so we don't see motion blur of a 1/48th or 1/50th shutter.
This is film school. Thank you for the explanation
Brilliantly explained!
Sony cameras don't actually shoot with shutter open across many frames, they just drop the frame rate... (but still encode to the set frame rate in the codec)
First, thank you for laying this out so clearly. Big help! There is only place where I got stuck ... At 2:50, you have a graphic that says, "When shooting at 24p: Have the shutter speed at 1/50s (or 1/48s); Have the shutter angle at 180 degrees (or 172.8 degrees). This implies 1/50s = 180 degrees and 1/48s = 172.8 degrees. Seems backwards. For 24p, it should be stated in a way that makes 1/48s correspond to 180 degrees. Right? This is kind of hard the first time through so I may just be confused.
I need to watch this 24 times!
That was a lot to assimilate in one video. But you did make it as simple as possible.
Sir one question has appeared in my mind sometime. In the purpose of Videography on DSLR Camera, which criteria should i follow everytime if my FPS setting is 25p.
1. I should take videography in auto mode only.
2. Should follow manual mode and Shutter Speed should maintain 1/50 where Aparture 5.6/Other.
3. Should follow Shutter Speed priority mode with 1/50.
Which is best setting?
That was really well explained, I will be following you here as I am on your interesting website also. Informative and inspiring, thank you !
This is a great explanation, but I feel like it is hamstrung by the fact that TH-cam is only showing it at 25FPS. It shows the difference in blur correctly, but doesn't convey the sense of smooth movement that something playing back at 60FPS+ would show (such as in the sports/video games section). Is there perhaps another copy of this hosted somewhere else?
Your videos are packed with useful information..
Wow !! Your rally very very talented sir, hats off you....
Awesome and clear video!
If you want to shoot for slow motion, should you then use a higher FPS say 60/120/240 etc OR just use a faster shutter speed/lower shutter angle(if using video cameras) while using 24 FPS?
If we use higher FPS, then we would HAVE to use the 180 degree rule, don't we? Coz if we don't, won't the footage not be clean enough when the footage is interpreted on a 24 FPS timeline in editing software?
This man is amazing!
Excellent information! Well presented!
Thanks!
THIS IS FANTASTIC!!!!!! many thanks. for real!
Thank you for captions.
You're welcome!
Great video, very informative. Thanks!
You're welcome!
Great job on explaining.
Thank you!
Wow this great message i want to personally recommend for any cinematographer
Very well explained, thanks!
You're welcome!
it very useful video ever I seen about shutter angle, but one doubt is not cleared yet " some sony cameras have low shutter speed (below 10) when filming'
And if you film 50p and drop it in an 25p timeline? Shutterspeed at 1/50 instead of 1/100? Because of jitter when removing every second frame...?
Thanks so much. Very helpful
You're welcome!
Awesome.. thank you for the great content and clearing my doubt sir.
And if I am shooting in 60fps just to make slow-motion in some parts, but in others the speed will be normal and the video will be rendered in 24fps? Which shutter speed should I use, 1/48 or 1/120?
Excellent presentation
Great video. Well explained!
Thank you!
Please discuss flickering as well
Gosh subscribed after one video. Thank you so much for the info!
You're welcome!
Great information, appreciate the post!
Awesome Stuff for all filmmakers, thank you so much
Very informative, thank you!
Very good video ! thanks a lot for posting.
Very enlighting! Thanks.
You're welcome!
excellent! thanks for your knowledge!
such a great, informative video. brilliant! thanks!
You're welcome!
This video is really helpful for me...Thank you so much...
Are you Indian friend? Anyway, very informative video, lots of love from India. Hope you reach more people! :)
Thank you!
Great video!!!.
Thanks!
Excellent explanation, thank you.