Edifier S3000Pro vs AirPulse A100 || Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
- S3000Pro on amazon DE: amzn.to/2PCWdZr
S3000Pro on amazon UK: amzn.to/2M90qEE
S3000Pro on bhphotovideo: bhpho.to/2CSBVow
A100 on amazon DE: amzn.to/2Kn7w6v
A100 on amazon UK: amzn.to/2Kl6urv
--------------------------------
Follow me on instagram for the latest updates and behind the scene look: / digitalstereophony
-----------------------------
All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
• Test Tracks
----------------------------
-Sound recorded using Zoom H6 recorder
-Frequency measurements done in semi treated room using UMIK-1 microphone
-Levels matched using SPL meter
-All tone controls set to neutral - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Stunning comparison!!! Keep up the science, my friend :)
These are both the same price in Canada.I would take the S3000's here with that 6.5" woofer and a bass adjustment.However, both are good.
both are really nice. edifier S3000 is a bit more frontal and full bodied and a wider soundstage; highs are a bit more pronounced. the airpulse 100 a bit more neutral. for long listening sessions the airpulse 100 would be more comfortable/enjoyable.
thanks, just choose between them!
Klipsch the sixes vs. S3000! Please
Hey DS, Great video as usual! What is your opinion on these both to be used on fast paced FPS PC desktop gaming? Any latency issue? Thanks.
No latency issues with either. Both will do great job as a fesktop gaming speaker, but S3000Pro will surely be more visceral at that
Digital Stereophony Thanks! I’m going to try it.
Both sounds fantastic, but I will choose the s3000pro because his bigger woofer, power and design (love the wood panels)
Спасибо! Отличное сравнение!
Klipsch the sixes vs. S3000! Please :)
make a Comparison between Edifier S3000Pro vs AirPulse A300Pro
Airpulse for me. It has this boomy lower end. The S300Pro seems to have more frequency that is not as audible to the mic w/c is clearly heard on the A100 :)
My goodness, those two can't be that far apart can they? This is the first of these where I thought, "Hey, that's not even close." (The A100's seem to do *everything* better.)
Why do all airpulse products are so natural and good? I mean i saw all their line(a100,a200,a300 and a300 pro) and its rly rly good, it;s very natural sound not fake like usualy, a studio experience i think. It's true it's expensive but for an audiophile it should be afordable i think...
*DISCLAMER* S3000Pro was recorded in "Classic" DSP mode, not "Monitor" mode as I claimed before. Classic mode boosts the treble significantly. I am sorry for the confusion.
> 10:02 < Frequency Response Graphs
> instagram.com/digitalstereophony < Follow me on instagram
Where are your personal comments on both ?
Edifier S3000Pro is a BEAST
Maybe you can do justice to the S3000pro. All the videos so far have the bass sucked out cos I presume they are in "monitor" mode (the right choice for channel sure). But these speakers are DSP corrected and have 4 modes for making music sound amazing (dynamic, slightly V shaped) or making music detailed, flat, and less bass (for monitoring). The 6.5 woofer is designed for deep bass without the need for a subwoofer. Unprecedented bass more than any other 6.5" driver. What I hear sounds like the bass from a 3" driver. Choose "Dynamic" mode. Do a video with just S3000pro "Monitor" Vs "Dynamic" mode. I can hear the tweeter and it's the best tweeter I've ever heard. It's just i can't hear the bass. Sorry, it's just the game has changed with DSP correction and makes the music sound completely different.
Only dynamic ❤+ 6bass+ 0treble
These comparisons are great... Wondering about S3000 vs Kanto TUK.
Hej Digital, może uda się porównać Edifier S3000 Pro z Klipsch the sixes?
Niestety nie uda się
@@DSAUDIOreview a jesteś w stanie odpowiedzieć mi, które z głośniki z tych dwóch par mają mocniejsze niskie tony?
A100 sounded closer to the original, while S3000Pro sounds more exciting, for me.
Airpulse очень хороши!
S3000 hands down... Much sharper... On long drive and retro wave its a big difference...
Hi DS!
What do you think about edifier s3000pro for 500€?
Fair price
@@DSAUDIOreview Cool!
do I win anything with an upgrade from my brand new s2000 mkiii to s3000 pro (if it's a good bargain)? I do love pretty much everything about these little boomboxes. The only thing probably is that on volume over 35 I have to reduce bass due to the sound distortions (mostly on some rap and trap soundtracks), yet it doesn't annoy that much. So, what do you say?
Привет, Евгений! Скажи, пожалуйста, насколько S3000 Pro лучше S2000MKIII? Стоит ли переходить с младшей на старшую модель?
@@user-gn7yo4qn6x вопрос цены и потребности. Вау эффекта у меня лично не было. Я сначала особо и разницу не услышал. 3000 более агрессивны на вч, особенно в режиме dynamic, нч у них более четкие, не такие размазанные, но на этом фоне, местами может показаться, что средина несколько задавлена, но это очень индивидуально, кому-то такой звук зайдет, кому то нет. 3000 будут играть громче без просадок по нч, т.к там побольше динамик ну и усь помощнее, но сказать, что разница в громкости прям двойная не могу. Мне хватало 2000 как раз впритык (это до 35 по таблу), да, иногда хотелось еще больше, но на всю без просадок они чисто играли разве гитару и вокал, но это было очень громко, я бы сказал даже больше заявленых 65ват на канал. 2000 мягче, нейтральнее, от них не так устаешь, но важно подобрать правильное расположение и комнату, что басс не гудел и не мазал. Более обьемный звук, конечно же на 3000 за счет 6.5, на 2000 очень удобный циферблат. В целом 3000 лучше для ритмичных стилей, 2000 больше для попсы, классики и т.д имхо. Если разница в цене дот200$ то можно задуматься, но если потеря будет 300 и даже выше, то однозначно нет. Если позволяет карман, я бы уже смотрел на а300. Мне разница стала в 50$, поэтому я и не жалею, но сказать, что я по новому ощущаю звук - нет.
@@user-on4bj2tr8f Благодарю за развернутый ответ 😉 Пользуюсь S2000MKIII почти 2 года. Колонки хороши, но иногда хочется добавить громкости и мощи на ритмичных треках, как ты и описал. Буду обдумывать, стоит ли переходить.
@@user-gn7yo4qn6x в таком случае определенно есть. Я иногда выкручиваю 3000 в упор, но так получится сделать далеко не со всеми трэками, если там гц 40 и ниже, то им тяжко будет, но вот, к примеру одни из моих любимых трюков которые я могу выкрутить на всю, это Zomboy - nuclear; The Prodigy- Smack my bitch up они вывозят на всю и я тупо получаю жстетическое удовольствие от ебейшего ора и басса, как бы смешно это не звучало, но я реально кайфую и по ощущениям они выдают около сотки а может и все 128 ватт на канал. S2000 mkiii тоже вывозили но уже надо было чуть понижать нч и да, они шикарны, 3000 про это просто даст еще больше кача, вот
S3000 давят сильно на уши!!!
A100!!
S300 PRO BEST AUDIO
first song "deep" name?
Can i tell me
i like'it
th-cam.com/video/SKZ8vuKecoU/w-d-xo.html
can I use the s3000pro on my desk and PC as a nearfield speaker?
Sure. S3000Pro works well in the nearfield scenario
@@DSAUDIOreviewhow to ideally place these speakers for maximum sound quality?
Edifier s3000pro 👍👍👍
S 3000 👍✨
Edifier s3000 pro wins.
More exciting and detailed sound.
Airpulse звучит натурально , у edifier слишком яркие высокие частоты, будет резать уши
Airpulse is ook Edifier :)
@@gixxerboy555 We are talking about models, not about the manufacturer.
S3000 Pro!
Edifier for me more transparent sound better clarity, better instrument separation I think.
this two speakers is edifier lol
@@dota2signature no Airpulse is Phil Jones
@@bobochobo ty for ur information
Actually AirPulse is a premium subbrand for Edifier, but indeed Phil Jones is responsible for the engineering department at AirPulse
@@DSAUDIOreview its his brand and he is responsible even for selling...
Airpulse is cool
A100
Edifier for me
Eduman1979 AirPulse is a sub brand of Edifier.
welke Edifier?haha
these speakers are bright and are far sounding than the original track which has a warm tone.
Its the way it's recorded. No recording will ever be able to portray what the speaker actually sounds like.
Why not use monitor mode for s3000pro?
That was a mistake I made while recording
Режим монітор це не стандартний режим ! Його постійно потрібно вмикати!
Airpulse a100 BEST!!!
Air pulse sounds better to me .. more fuller
The S3000Pro is extremely overdoing the trebles while having some absence in the mids.
AirPulse wins this for me, smoother top end, fuller mids, more balanced overall. They are both very similar but the S3000 is just slightly more top end boosted and mid scooped. People here saying S3000 is better are getting fooled by the "more treble = clearer = better" misconception. There's more to it than that.
Exactly!
@Peder Hansen lol, s3000 just have boosted highs, boosted too much.
s3000 more exciting
Peder Hansen like what? A 10,000$ system? Airpulse is the best speaker in the world for home usage, especially with a sub out.
@@EliasEH89 huh? You might need to expand your outlook...
Airpulse do soft on max
3000 pro best
A100 win
Мав s3000pro не сподобалися! Через пів року продав. Звук поганий душний ріжущий на різних налаштуваннях! Неможливо слухати - вуха болять!
airpulse
they both sounded overly bright
airpulse a100 better
Too complicated
Edifier are too bright. I'd take the airpulse because I can't take the edifier fatiguing highs. No way I'd pay $800 for either one. Airpulse sound kinda cheap to me. Original track sounds best. Maybe it's just my Klipsch. 😏
It's both Edifier
Because there is a300pro!)
Bad and bad🌚