Klipsch R-51PM vs AirPulse A100 - A Horn Loaded Duel || Sound & Response Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
- Klipsch R51PM on amazon DE: amzn.to/2PpVlqG
Klipsch R51PM on amazon UK: amzn.to/2Lx8w8t
Klipsch R51PM on bhphotovideo: bhpho.to/2OjFdXf
Airpulse A100 on amazon DE: amzn.to/2PnPx11
Airpulse A100 on amazon UK: amzn.to/2Rpc2W6
----------------------------
Follow me on:
Instagram - / digitalstereophony
Facebook - / digitalstereophony
-----------------------------
All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
• Test Tracks
----------------------------
-Sound recorded using Zoom H6 recorder
-Frequency measurements done in semi treated room using UMIK-1 microphone
-Levels matched using SPL meter
-All tone controls set to neutral - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
> 10:17 < Frequency Response Comparison
Follow me on:
Instagram - instagram.com/digitalstereophony/
Facebook - facebook.com/DigitalStereophony/
What setting for "Graph Smoothing" are you using (1/24, 1/12, 1/6...)?
@@Av-gurusBlogspot 1/6
Listening on HiFiMan HE4XX through a Schiit Stack.
The Klipsch resolve slightly more details in both mids and highs, and have slightly better imaging, but may be more V shaped.
The Airpulse A100 are far better at lows, specifically bass extension, and maintain a more neutral tonality while still being highly detailed and less V shaped, with mids more forward.
Both sound good, but the Airpulse A100 will be the more well rounded set of speakers imo.
Would you be able to try out the now 6-7 year old JBL 530s? May not be too relevant but they are atleast in production again in the US. Would love to see how they are against newer Klipsch speakers.
Any chance to review new Edifier s2000 mkIII soon?
Thanks for the very informative videos and comments.
Sure, as soon as I will be able to get my hands on them
@@DSAUDIOreview Edifier released new S2000? When? Is it old model?
The Sixes vs S3000pro
both are the same I guess, not that much of a difference even at the frequency response
I have been choosing speakers for a PC table for the 2nd week already. Now the R2000DB speakers are excellent in their segment. But I really want something higher. My eyes fell on Klipsh r-51pm. They are by no means small. If you sit in front of the monitor at a distance of 1-1.5m, then logically they should be tilted back (special stands are sold 15 degrees tilt the speakers), so that the woofer and tweeter are directed at the face. Will they make an excellent sound from such a distance or will there be nonsense from the sounds of which thread) I don’t know. Or do not regret and buy the Airpulse a100 right away, which are exactly under the comp table like native ones. I'm also considering buying an airpulse a80 and a sub later. Unfortunately, it is not possible to listen to all these three options. But I can only imagine how they sound. Klipsh definitely have a warmer undertone. And airpulse a100, a80 is sharper due to the ribbon tweeter (if you can call it that)) I mostly listen to heavy and electronic music, which seems to hint at Klipsh))) But how will they work on the table?
Airpulse sounds a little better, but for the price I prefer klipsch.
the possible in the future there will be testing Subwoofer?
No plans at the moment. If you want some good subwoofer videos than try Depo196 channel, he tested a lot of subs recently
Еще раз убедился, что стоит ждать А100, когда поступят в продажу в РФ. Автору видео спасибо!
В Украине клипш стоит на 50% дешевле а100
Очень похожи в звучании, только в середине немного отличаются пришлось даже наушники надеть, увидел в конце график значит слух меня не подвел! 😉
По нч airpulse однозначно в выигрыше). Был бы я сильный любитель акустики, однозначно взял. Белые))) очень дизайнерски хорошо они выглядят. Но я люблю больше наушники. В них действительно в разы больше слышно за куда меньшую стоимость. И не надо шкафы картины и ковры вешать в комнату)
если нет никакой разницы зачем платить больше?)
both sounds Good but Original Source track sounds Better always
ZS Park it will do as the source track isn’t being played out of speakers, into a room and then recorded on a microphone, all of which will change the sound!
你们能想象在中国AirPulse A100只需要360 $ ？而Klipsch R-51PM在中国需要630 $.不同的地区价格也是要考虑的重点。
台灣反而價格是相反的...
你们更无法想象在加拿大airpulse a100要1200$这还是税前价格
1200$可以买一对jbl 306p mkii 加一对130几的音箱支架 加两条信号线 加一个200多的功放我不理解漫步者到底谁它的自信定这样的价格
Air Pulse is 360 $ when purchased in China
Omg seriously?
@@otaviosmartins1 That‘s true，and i had just brought one。
Can you give some more details ?
They are 600 euro in Europe, the problem is if they cost let's say 360 euro in China, shipping costs and import tax will make them more expensive than to buy local. :)
Airpulse are clean as fuck
Может я уже в силу возраста хуже слышу ,но не вижу вообще разницы в звучании. Ни в низу ,ни в середине ,ни на верху ,если эйрпульс дешевле ,то он победитель.
Они и вправду очень близки по звуку, в ВЧ только ощутимая разница и то если слушать в хороших наушниках : )
Airpulse more full and delicate. Better drive.
Аэрпульс гуд
a100 for me
Theres a considerable difference in price but not on the sound. I'd go for the Klipsch without any doubt
To my uneducated ears it sounds like a coin flip as to which is best.
I just picked up a pair of R-51m's at BestBuy for $200, (open box in perfect shape, retail was $216) they are REALLY nice for a small to mid-sized room. I have good ears and the A100's were very close. I liked the 51's better in this test. If you listen again the voices sound more real and the bass is crisper. I find the A100's to be slightly too bright. Great comparison.
You got the R-51PM's for $200 or the passive ones R-51M's?
@@edmondsamuel51 R-51M (passive)
@@nofilter2091 I want to get something and I am so confused with which way to go. I got powered speakers like the 51-PM's available for $339 on Amazon now and considering the Edifier S3000Pro but for $799 I can get a receiver and speakers for that price that probably sound better.
@@edmondsamuel51 I got these for my gaming PC setup and general audio use. The PM's are just powered and sound the same, but the SOURCE is most important. I bought a Focusrite Scarlett solo 3rd gen DAC ($109) and ran it to a high-end receiver that I already had. If you are using a PC as the source then I would recommend the DAC that I bought, it made a pretty noticeable difference in clarity and bass response. It's also great for headphone use as well. Since you already have an amplified speaker, maybe all you need is a DAC like the one I bought to clear up the signal and call it a day.
@@nofilter2091 I think the PM's have a built in DAC
кажется что это одинаковые колонки
AirPulse better highs
Higs and mids
The sound is pretty similar, but the price is not ...
It's 360 dollars if you buy it directly from China
Both of them are too sharp in my opinion, went too far with the high
還是實際聽比較準，根本音色不同
請問還是Klipsch 比較值得購買嗎？
@@book8tw 这个价位买一对jbl 305p mkii如果你的房间够大买306p 绝对比买它们两个更好 你可能还有剩余的钱拿去买一个不错的功放 加一个音箱支架
я так понимаю этот ролик показал ,что Klipsch R-51PM стоит своих денег,а AirPulse A100 нет
I understand this video showed that the Klipsch R-51PM is worth the money, but the AirPulse A100 is not
There are aspects and characteristics of those speakers that can not be tranlsated via YT video that elevate A100 over R51PM, like sense of space and 3D imagining, very low self noise level, headroom and overall build quality. Do they justify the price difference? It is very subjective to be honest, for me personally it is, but for someone else the answer can be different
Своим комментом ты показал свой уровень, лол
@@DSAUDIOreview thanks, I realized that I was wrong
I am not trying to convince you to A100 or denounce your opinion, im just sharing my opinion. Your opinion is neither wrong or right and so is mine
@Rapha 194 they are both very good, but for desktop use I would pick MTM mostly due to ARC Room Correction and more extended bass. A100 would be my choice for more midfield use, especially with subwoofer. I will have a comparison of A100 and MTM soon ;)
both miss bass
It depends a lot in what are you using to listen.
They don't go down to 20 Hz, a small sub will fill in the gap.
Do something about "music" you are playing; it's utter garbage, regardless of test, that does not help reveal real differences: accuracy, imaging, details.
Airpulse