Have to mention this every video, Konami's philosophy on erratas changed quite drastically from 2014 to 2020, nowadays all a card gets is a hard opt or some extra type or archetype lock, Summon Sorceress is perfectly follows that line like AFD, Firewall, REDMD and Makyura.
@@VixYW not only was the "summon to the opponent's field" optional and could drop a floodgate without negating its effect, Sorc could also skip this and summon something with the same type your arrows pointed to. Now unless you also have a viable target in hand it wont work forcing you to give something to the opponent so it requires even more setup.
@@emersongrtcg You sure? Some multiple summon effects result in a single draw. Although I have no idea on how to identify them, for me this one just reads like it.
Tbf Riser to 1 actually made sense compared to S:P to 2. There were some combo lines in which you could go through 2 riser to make a calamity play in brave piles. People don't remember it because it almost saw no play outside of a few regionals if I remember correctly.
Another small change to Summon Sorc that everyone glosses over is that it now also negates the monster you give to your opponent, while the pre-errata didn't negate the first monster. I assume they added that part to make sure she wouldn't be yet another Puppet Lock or Iblee enabler. Love to see the continued (if very slow) crackdown on floodgates. TCBOO to 1 and Kaiser to 2 are more (tiny) steps in the objectively correct direction. A couple of the newly Semi-limiteds seem like warning shots - cards that will be put to 1 or 0 within the next couple banlists after this. I mean S:P Little Knight, Snake Eye Ash, and Fire King Kirin mostly here. S:P to 1 would make Pot of E much riskier (and putting it to 2 does little since everyone already only plays 1 unless they are using Pot of E).
I think Gimmick Puppet Nightmare is one of those Azathot-esk locks which is a condition not a trigger so it can't be negated. I'm not entirely sure but if that's the case then I:P into Sorc to give the opponent Nightmare might see play. Even if I am wrong, there are other cards you can give the opponent so you can trigger their floating or allow you to use a "While the opponent controls a Monster" condition.
@@pickyphysicsstudent201No. You are talking about activated effects and lingering effects, but if a card is summoned negated, neither applies since the card just becomes a blank.
This... May be bad for the opponent if you can get out flare metal... Not hard with level 7s being accessible especially with the d Rulers coming back, and get say, Sangan out with ocg not having any limits on tour guide or sangan. Link up to summon sorc and summon Gellenduo to the opponents field... The effect is negated but activates still
rescue ace was playing 2 but yeah this is basically the OCG telling players that they plan to do something about this card soon as a heads up warning basically since the card is mildly expensive in the ocg at 25$
erratas are only bad when they inherently change how the card works. summon sorc is still the same essentially. now you cannot target your own monster for the summon from deck anymore and you get xenolocked afterwards. why print a summon sorc 2 who is so close to the og that it feels like an errata and not just errata her instead
I like how after talking about the grass is greener thing he starts talking about Pokémon and one piece. Every TCG has complaints it’s just how it goes.
I really hate that korean tweet cause it make people think that's what all OCG player thinking. i'd take progressive hit rather than outright killing the archetype playability
Its like the "gaming journalism" websites cherrypicking tweets about "(insert game mechanic here) IS BUSTED" while its only got like 25 likes and 3 retweets
I think errata should be used on cards that are banned for exploits that they cause or heavily break the rules of the game and make a match unplayable. Things that cause perma-stalling and locking. If a card is on the ban list for what seems like forever then chances are it needs an errata. Otherwise you'll have a bunch of dead cards. Its like a game patch for card games.
@Lightstation_ This is just incorrect. Just because a card has the same name and artwork does not mean it's the same card because the relevant part of the card here is the effect text, and since it differs from the original it is not the original and the original can't be unbanned because it literally doesn't exist anymore.
@@Lightstation_ If they errata'd max-C and put it to 3. But now it is vanilla divine monster. With the flavor text "Draw this out!" Would it be the same card?
@@andreobarros those are two different situations and also an extreme. There's a difference in an erata and changing the attribute and making it a vanilla monster. Would you call every single erata a brand new card and not unbanned because the effect text changed slightly...?
I gonna give the prob to the guy/team that design the TCG banlist. Most of them are on point. Well, maybe not the Circular joke that went too far... where Josh kill the one guy at local that just wanted to play casual cyberse.
The big question is why Summon Sorceress? There are cards on the banlist that people do have nostalgia for, as well as cards on the banlist that are related to famous archetypes. Summon Sorceress is a generic Link monster which I don't think anyone actually liked. This honestly goes back to the 'STOP MAKING GENERIC LINK MONSTERS' argument. I don't understand the OCG's logic of choosing to rerelease a slightly errata'd version of a type of card which the majority of players hate seeing. No one likes generic's, we want decks to have 'theme's' not every deck ending on the same cards over and over again.
On Farfa's last point about other TCGs being concering for konami i don't think this is the case, yeah other games are doing well objectively, but yugioh is never going to die, the game is too big, it's too ingrained into people's lives and in general pop culture to truly dissapear, it might have some ups and downs in terms of gameplay quality but that's always been the case and the game has survived 25 years up to this point so i wouldn't worry about it's lifespan. That being said konami should do better and they should communicate more with the playerbase, they should respect their playerbase more and be less afraid to reach out to them, we all want the game we love to do thrive after all.
So... Diabellstar is a level 7 that specials itself by sending any card from hand or field... Black metal dragon adds any red eyes card when sent from field. Witch Diabellstar and Black metal or red-eyes black meteor is nasty if you don't stop it, especially if you get my bad, witch of the black forest or get Gellenduo in hand since any 2 monsters turn into Reprodocus
The S:P semi-limit is for those decks who play Pot of Extravagance because some put 3 of her in their extra deck to reduce the change that she gets banished and is no longer usable. You also can see it as a warning from Konami that this card is in their focus and might get further hits.
@@kyounokaien It doesn't matter, because the potential is there and Konami already reacted with their banlist to sitations that could be happening and are not actually happening.
One card I think would be funny to Errata would be Toon Cannon Soldier if they changed it to no longer die if Toon World is destroyed and changed the 500lp burn to require tributing a Toon monster specifically instead. It would go from being an FTK enabler that sucks in toons to just a card that's slightly less bad in Toons than before and played nowhere else but is legal again.
She only gives one draw to maxx c now cause of the errata, but its also not great because eveything has to happen at once instead of being able to split your summons up at differnt points in the turn. I can see it being good in some brews but im probably juwt not smart enough to see the lines
errata should exist only for recent broken cards, leave the old stuff in the banlist forever without ruining the flavor. Also sorceress does not seem very good, the effect is only one and you have to summon something on the other side of the field.
Imagine Flamberge (on the field first) and then find a way to make Summon Sorceress Co-Exist together. This causes lock outs to be a thing again. Remind me why OCG unlimited Summon Sorceress again?
You know what, I really want to see a new master rule format where instead of 3 copy in deck, you can only have 2 copy. Essentially putting most card in semi limit. I'm really curious how it would affect yugioh as a whole
TCG banlist hits tend to outright murder decks forever, rather than simply toning them down to sane levels. That may feel 'better' if you personally hate whatever the current busted deck is, but it's really not an objectively good approach. In addition, TCG is also bizarrely slow to unban cards that are powercrept. How long did it take to start unbanning TOSS stuff? Why is Electrumite still banned?
Summon Sorc just seems like Halq but better pre errata. Post Errata it’s still just a better Halq locking you into 1 attribute isn’t that big of a deal for most of the game. Idk why Konami thought this was a good idea they have a long history of bad ideas but lately it seems to be getting worse
It's type, not attribute. And most decks that only play one type lock themselves before they would be able to make this. This does basically nothing for the top decks as well.
I will probably use her in my vendreads. I am a filthy vendread pet decker 4 lyfe. I just need a monster that becomes zombie world on the field so I don't play the garbage field spell.
I wouldn't mind erratas so much if they were less reluctant to undo erratas, or dile them back if they totally murder a card out of playability and need to readjust. Like today Sinister Serpent would never see play with its original effect, same goes for Brain Control (unrestricted Change of Heart proof enough for ya?). Why not revoke erratas once in a while to make them semi-playable. And if we are going to errata cards; maybe save their original intent or make cards better for goodness sake? Level Eater: add "for the rest of the turn after this card was summoned by its own effect, monsters cannot be summoned from the extra deck except for Synchro Summon" to prevent Link spam. Or change some "if" effects to "when" effects so cards don't miss timing and can be used as they were probably intended to before rulings and problem solving card text made the cards nerf themselves 🤷♂️
Summon Sorc still seems giga broken. Discard 1 to summon anything out of your deck is still disgusting. It's so easy to make baronne nowadays that there is no way that monster is staying there on their field. Literally IO situation. But I guess I could be wrong, it is 2024 and the lock might make your plans harder.
Summon Sorc is getting an errata because she is a very popular waifu card in Japan and cannot be playable any other way, change my mind. Hint: You cannot
You’re actually watching one piece? Well hopefully you enjoy. The episode count is just a number after you get locked in since it’s a fun viewing experience (people see it from the outside and get scared off but it’s irrelevant on the inside looking out)
regarding the "grass looks greener"-argument: as bad as the tcg sometimes is, I a 100% prefer the tcg banlist. it is just so much better (or the ocg is just so much worse).
I instinctually dislike balance erratas. The card I like no longer exists, and will never exist again. Either unban the card or leave it to rot in infamy on the banlist .
Sorc is a Link-3 and needing to give the opponent something to then Tutor from deck makes her a pretty heavy cost, espcially if you get Ash'd - IDK the PSCT rulings here. Alot of decks which can make Sorc likely have other better ways of tutoring out what they want. Everything is searchable now that we have Small World.
Konami: "Please don't spend money on the third SP. We need you to spend that money on the new sets so our quarterly earnings don't suffer." Edit: I;m glad to see Farfa getting into the One Piece anime. He might be able to get caught up before his daughter enters primary school.
@@AceL. no I know. I’m talking about the TCG. Chaos Ruler, Grass, snow and baby Dragons are all banned and limited, the deck won’t be much. I mean it already - and since day one - lacks a starter card anyway 🤷♂️
@@yaroubthayer-752 eventually he will come back to tcg but it would be better if they erata the floodgate with something along to negate or destroy the searched card by banishing one thunder monster from gy. The ss condition should be limited to light and dark thunders so corridor doesn't cheat him out. Solar and bystials work fine with the archetype in MD.
Grass should forever stay in the banned section but yeah, actually make Snow a hard once per turn and she would be fine and also maybe make her cost higher to summon.
It 100% deserves all the hate it got. Block Dragon is such a broken card that was only printed because Rock monsters were weak until Adamancipator broke the type. Until it gets an errata it will remain banned.
@@FrostReave y'all are spamming linear combos left right n center on every other archetype, at least there was a degree of luck involved with adamancipator searches. Y'all thought adamancipator was gonna suck when they announced it too, now we being punished just cuz the MD excavate animation slow AF 😂
@@blamberton7893 luck becomes a non-factor when you reach a certain mass of extenders. Also with only Leonite revealed people thought it was bad, as soon as the rest of the support was leaked both Adam and Synchro Eldlich were thought to be tier 1.
@@babrad bro, I was there telling everyone it was cracked and I had to argue til it was released lmao. And come on dude, we've all seen blackwing set up more disgusting boards than adamancipator ever did, adamancipator just abused generic good shit (that actually should be banned imo). Board ended on bsd, herald, dragoon/dpe, baronne and dragite, just like everyone else except eldlitch when halqi, verte and aurorodon were legal together. Ban the bs generic omni negates/removal and leave block dragon alone
Have to mention this every video, Konami's philosophy on erratas changed quite drastically from 2014 to 2020, nowadays all a card gets is a hard opt or some extra type or archetype lock, Summon Sorceress is perfectly follows that line like AFD, Firewall, REDMD and Makyura.
Summon sorc is also all one effect now as well. No longer two effects. You now summon to your field and your opponents field at the same time
Which is a buff against Maxx C if that means only 1 draw from it.
@@VixYW it's also a nerf because it means you NEED to do everything at once
@@VixYW with that text, she Summons 2 times, so 2 draws from Maxx C
@@VixYW not only was the "summon to the opponent's field" optional and could drop a floodgate without negating its effect, Sorc could also skip this and summon something with the same type your arrows pointed to. Now unless you also have a viable target in hand it wont work forcing you to give something to the opponent so it requires even more setup.
@@emersongrtcg You sure? Some multiple summon effects result in a single draw. Although I have no idea on how to identify them, for me this one just reads like it.
Tbf Riser to 1 actually made sense compared to S:P to 2.
There were some combo lines in which you could go through 2 riser to make a calamity play in brave piles. People don't remember it because it almost saw no play outside of a few regionals if I remember correctly.
Another small change to Summon Sorc that everyone glosses over is that it now also negates the monster you give to your opponent, while the pre-errata didn't negate the first monster.
I assume they added that part to make sure she wouldn't be yet another Puppet Lock or Iblee enabler.
Love to see the continued (if very slow) crackdown on floodgates. TCBOO to 1 and Kaiser to 2 are more (tiny) steps in the objectively correct direction.
A couple of the newly Semi-limiteds seem like warning shots - cards that will be put to 1 or 0 within the next couple banlists after this. I mean S:P Little Knight, Snake Eye Ash, and Fire King Kirin mostly here. S:P to 1 would make Pot of E much riskier (and putting it to 2 does little since everyone already only plays 1 unless they are using Pot of E).
I think Gimmick Puppet Nightmare is one of those Azathot-esk locks which is a condition not a trigger so it can't be negated. I'm not entirely sure but if that's the case then I:P into Sorc to give the opponent Nightmare might see play.
Even if I am wrong, there are other cards you can give the opponent so you can trigger their floating or allow you to use a "While the opponent controls a Monster" condition.
@@pickyphysicsstudent201No. You are talking about activated effects and lingering effects, but if a card is summoned negated, neither applies since the card just becomes a blank.
This... May be bad for the opponent if you can get out flare metal... Not hard with level 7s being accessible especially with the d Rulers coming back, and get say, Sangan out with ocg not having any limits on tour guide or sangan. Link up to summon sorc and summon Gellenduo to the opponents field... The effect is negated but activates still
"I feel it's really strange they're doing erratas again"
They literally do this every year
Weird that S:P is semi limited when players only use one anyway.
Its so pot of extravagence is scarier to use in sp decks
some people used 2 because it comes up, but 3? never
Some people play S:P at two but it's rare. I see it as a warning shot that the card is going to be limited next list.
rescue ace was playing 2 but yeah this is basically the OCG telling players that they plan to do something about this card soon as a heads up warning basically since the card is mildly expensive in the ocg at 25$
it's going to get limited next list and then banned
Farfa being two episodes into One Piece was the best news coming out of this video lmao
erratas are only bad when they inherently change how the card works. summon sorc is still the same essentially. now you cannot target your own monster for the summon from deck anymore and you get xenolocked afterwards. why print a summon sorc 2 who is so close to the og that it feels like an errata and not just errata her instead
I like how after talking about the grass is greener thing he starts talking about Pokémon and one piece.
Every TCG has complaints it’s just how it goes.
I really hate that korean tweet cause it make people think that's what all OCG player thinking. i'd take progressive hit rather than outright killing the archetype playability
Its like the "gaming journalism" websites cherrypicking tweets about "(insert game mechanic here) IS BUSTED" while its only got like 25 likes and 3 retweets
I think errata should be used on cards that are banned for exploits that they cause or heavily break the rules of the game and make a match unplayable. Things that cause perma-stalling and locking. If a card is on the ban list for what seems like forever then chances are it needs an errata. Otherwise you'll have a bunch of dead cards. Its like a game patch for card games.
You know what needs an errata, azure eyes doesn't count as a blue eyes monster. . .
Oh man how can I run my deck now without a third S-P? Oh well, I’ll just slap in my Proxy Dragon as a replacement
Ngl I’ve always wanted Summon Sorc to get unbanned, I just didn’t think it would actually happen
Summon Sorc is still banned. This is a different card with the same artwork, but now the real Summon Sorc is permanently banned.
@@IC-23how does that make sense? Summon sorceress is unbanned because it got an erata. Like chaos emperor dragon. It's not a different card my guy
@Lightstation_ This is just incorrect. Just because a card has the same name and artwork does not mean it's the same card because the relevant part of the card here is the effect text, and since it differs from the original it is not the original and the original can't be unbanned because it literally doesn't exist anymore.
@@Lightstation_ If they errata'd max-C and put it to 3.
But now it is vanilla divine monster. With the flavor text "Draw this out!"
Would it be the same card?
@@andreobarros those are two different situations and also an extreme. There's a difference in an erata and changing the attribute and making it a vanilla monster.
Would you call every single erata a brand new card and not unbanned because the effect text changed slightly...?
I gonna give the prob to the guy/team that design the TCG banlist. Most of them are on point.
Well, maybe not the Circular joke that went too far... where Josh kill the one guy at local that just wanted to play casual cyberse.
The big question is why Summon Sorceress? There are cards on the banlist that people do have nostalgia for, as well as cards on the banlist that are related to famous archetypes. Summon Sorceress is a generic Link monster which I don't think anyone actually liked. This honestly goes back to the 'STOP MAKING GENERIC LINK MONSTERS' argument. I don't understand the OCG's logic of choosing to rerelease a slightly errata'd version of a type of card which the majority of players hate seeing. No one likes generic's, we want decks to have 'theme's' not every deck ending on the same cards over and over again.
Agree 100%
Maybe we’re about to get a wave of non-codetalker/firewall Yusaku support?
I think it because of art honestly
because she's hot, which I completely agree with, based errata tbh
Probably because people do like Summon sorceress the character, not the card (or as Farfa's chat would say, BOOBA).
I don't really see an issue with erratas, as a concept. Some are bad, but the idea itself is fine.
On Farfa's last point about other TCGs being concering for konami i don't think this is the case, yeah other games are doing well objectively, but yugioh is never going to die, the game is too big, it's too ingrained into people's lives and in general pop culture to truly dissapear, it might have some ups and downs in terms of gameplay quality but that's always been the case and the game has survived 25 years up to this point so i wouldn't worry about it's lifespan.
That being said konami should do better and they should communicate more with the playerbase, they should respect their playerbase more and be less afraid to reach out to them, we all want the game we love to do thrive after all.
So... Diabellstar is a level 7 that specials itself by sending any card from hand or field... Black metal dragon adds any red eyes card when sent from field.
Witch Diabellstar and Black metal or red-eyes black meteor is nasty if you don't stop it, especially if you get my bad, witch of the black forest or get Gellenduo in hand since any 2 monsters turn into Reprodocus
yeah, errata my union carrier
First video I saw about the banlist I thought was clickbait, but nope. She's fucking back
The S:P semi-limit is for those decks who play Pot of Extravagance because some put 3 of her in their extra deck to reduce the change that she gets banished and is no longer usable. You also can see it as a warning from Konami that this card is in their focus and might get further hits.
there's not one deck on road of the king with 3 s:p and extrav
@@kyounokaien It doesn't matter, because the potential is there and Konami already reacted with their banlist to sitations that could be happening and are not actually happening.
One card I think would be funny to Errata would be Toon Cannon Soldier if they changed it to no longer die if Toon World is destroyed and changed the 500lp burn to require tributing a Toon monster specifically instead. It would go from being an FTK enabler that sucks in toons to just a card that's slightly less bad in Toons than before and played nowhere else but is legal again.
She only gives one draw to maxx c now cause of the errata, but its also not great because eveything has to happen at once instead of being able to split your summons up at differnt points in the turn. I can see it being good in some brews but im probably juwt not smart enough to see the lines
16:00 The uncle bug ruins everything.
I doubt many TCG players think that way.
With the errata SummSorc doesn't have any way to lock the opponent with I:P and Barrier Statues or Puppets.
errata should exist only for recent broken cards, leave the old stuff in the banlist forever without ruining the flavor. Also sorceress does not seem very good, the effect is only one and you have to summon something on the other side of the field.
Imagine Flamberge (on the field first) and then find a way to make Summon Sorceress Co-Exist together. This causes lock outs to be a thing again. Remind me why OCG unlimited Summon Sorceress again?
You know what, I really want to see a new master rule format where instead of 3 copy in deck, you can only have 2 copy. Essentially putting most card in semi limit. I'm really curious how it would affect yugioh as a whole
TCG banlist hits tend to outright murder decks forever, rather than simply toning them down to sane levels. That may feel 'better' if you personally hate whatever the current busted deck is, but it's really not an objectively good approach.
In addition, TCG is also bizarrely slow to unban cards that are powercrept. How long did it take to start unbanning TOSS stuff? Why is Electrumite still banned?
Summon Sorc just seems like Halq but better pre errata. Post Errata it’s still just a better Halq locking you into 1 attribute isn’t that big of a deal for most of the game. Idk why Konami thought this was a good idea they have a long history of bad ideas but lately it seems to be getting worse
It's type, not attribute. And most decks that only play one type lock themselves before they would be able to make this. This does basically nothing for the top decks as well.
Fishborg blaster my beloved.
It wouldn't be a OCG/master duel banlist without the weirdest semi-limit you have ever seen
summon sorc in infernoble is nuts
"objective truth imo" xd
Yeah, bring infernity back. I can't wait for people to start setting their monsters in the backrow and scooping when I mst them.
Maybe once per turn errata’s are a good compromise
Tcg should bring back the March 1st September 1st ban lists
"I cant really think of anything else."
JOSHUA SMITT BANNED CIRCULAR BECAUSE HE WON YCS.
I am so glad I can finally push my penguin deck to masters
I will probably use her in my vendreads. I am a filthy vendread pet decker 4 lyfe. I just need a monster that becomes zombie world on the field so I don't play the garbage field spell.
Errata to clarify an effect, fine. Errata to change an effect, sucks.
Will this errata be valid for the TCG as well?
They Ironically xenolocked Sum sorc. I think itz better now ironically.
IT WAS ME BARRY, MY UNCLE WORKS AT CONAMY AND CHANGED S:P TO 2 WHEN NO ONE WAS LOOKING!
The OCG system and content is always better.
Summon sorcerer back? LETS GO TRAIN FTK LETS GOOOOOOOOO🗣️🗣️🗣️
Pefect deck:
30 Pot Of Greed
10 Ookazi
I wouldn't mind erratas so much if they were less reluctant to undo erratas, or dile them back if they totally murder a card out of playability and need to readjust. Like today Sinister Serpent would never see play with its original effect, same goes for Brain Control (unrestricted Change of Heart proof enough for ya?). Why not revoke erratas once in a while to make them semi-playable. And if we are going to errata cards; maybe save their original intent or make cards better for goodness sake? Level Eater: add "for the rest of the turn after this card was summoned by its own effect, monsters cannot be summoned from the extra deck except for Synchro Summon" to prevent Link spam. Or change some "if" effects to "when" effects so cards don't miss timing and can be used as they were probably intended to before rulings and problem solving card text made the cards nerf themselves 🤷♂️
9:28 “Would you guys let SP fart on you?” Wtf 😂
I really dislike the errata on sorc. Like Farfa said, why sorc instead of any other card? What does this achieve?
The difference is, Things like Iblee are negated. And you can only summon with the second effect right after using the first one
i think sorc would never be unbanned without an errata, idk how you can powercreep special from deck with no restrictions on a link 3
Sorceress gets the errata because of the wifu appeal!
Summon Sorc still seems giga broken. Discard 1 to summon anything out of your deck is still disgusting. It's so easy to make baronne nowadays that there is no way that monster is staying there on their field. Literally IO situation. But I guess I could be wrong, it is 2024 and the lock might make your plans harder.
but with the errata its basicaly useless for 95% of decks
How come Circular has no errata in OCG if it's soooooooo broken?
Just ban Pot of E. Pretty much destroys or solves 1/4 of the net deckers on MD ranked problem.
I can see a lot of stun decks coming back.
Summon Sorc is getting an errata because she is a very popular waifu card in Japan and cannot be playable any other way, change my mind. Hint: You cannot
Let’s go no yugimon banlist
Well we probably get a alt art
You’re actually watching one piece? Well hopefully you enjoy. The episode count is just a number after you get locked in since it’s a fun viewing experience (people see it from the outside and get scared off but it’s irrelevant on the inside looking out)
regarding the "grass looks greener"-argument: as bad as the tcg sometimes is, I a 100% prefer the tcg banlist. it is just so much better (or the ocg is just so much worse).
I instinctually dislike balance erratas. The card I like no longer exists, and will never exist again.
Either unban the card or leave it to rot in infamy on the banlist .
Sorc is a Link-3 and needing to give the opponent something to then Tutor from deck makes her a pretty heavy cost, espcially if you get Ash'd - IDK the PSCT rulings here. Alot of decks which can make Sorc likely have other better ways of tutoring out what they want. Everything is searchable now that we have Small World.
why is farfa using MD meta website
Konami: "Please don't spend money on the third SP. We need you to spend that money on the new sets so our quarterly earnings don't suffer."
Edit: I;m glad to see Farfa getting into the One Piece anime. He might be able to get caught up before his daughter enters primary school.
Infernity best deck!! 🗣🗣‼️‼️
Farfa being canonically Muslim is cool
Hope you like One Piece (if that wasn’t a joke).
S:P hit seems like a warning shot.
Maxx "c" is at 3 in the OCG, I would say that Japanese player is on point.
Summon Sorc gets an errata because Waifu. That is all
Change of fart huh?
TIL S:P was semi-limited due to cultural Marxism and woke
No shes not back shes das ad nerfed
Becuse block not hot
They unbanned all TOSS format decks except Thunder Dragons wtf‼️ Like even snow and Grass are banned… just let me sit on Colossus pass one more time
He is limited on ocg
@@AceL. no I know. I’m talking about the TCG. Chaos Ruler, Grass, snow and baby Dragons are all banned and limited, the deck won’t be much. I mean it already - and since day one - lacks a starter card anyway 🤷♂️
@@yaroubthayer-752 eventually he will come back to tcg but it would be better if they erata the floodgate with something along to negate or destroy the searched card by banishing one thunder monster from gy. The ss condition should be limited to light and dark thunders so corridor doesn't cheat him out.
Solar and bystials work fine with the archetype in MD.
Grass should forever stay in the banned section but yeah, actually make Snow a hard once per turn and she would be fine and also maybe make her cost higher to summon.
@@AceL. I’d rather they keep cards banned rather than an errata tbh. Erratas aren’t good for the TCG
I made a prediction list where i hit cards that didn't make sense to hit, and people said "why would they hit it, its pointless" whos laughing now?
The people managing the OCG are incompetent af. They are the reason master duel is trash
How so?
@@ericmay560 Just look at the bamlist in MD, its even worse than the OCG one.
Eratas are dumb just make a new retain card that does the new effeft
Instead of errata's, they should just make new cards with the edited effects.
Adamancipator doesnt deserve all the hate, block dragon did nothing wrong and we deserve a ycs top.
Block deserves to stay banned bc of adamancipator
It 100% deserves all the hate it got. Block Dragon is such a broken card that was only printed because Rock monsters were weak until Adamancipator broke the type. Until it gets an errata it will remain banned.
@@FrostReave y'all are spamming linear combos left right n center on every other archetype, at least there was a degree of luck involved with adamancipator searches. Y'all thought adamancipator was gonna suck when they announced it too, now we being punished just cuz the MD excavate animation slow AF 😂
@@blamberton7893 luck becomes a non-factor when you reach a certain mass of extenders. Also with only Leonite revealed people thought it was bad, as soon as the rest of the support was leaked both Adam and Synchro Eldlich were thought to be tier 1.
@@babrad bro, I was there telling everyone it was cracked and I had to argue til it was released lmao. And come on dude, we've all seen blackwing set up more disgusting boards than adamancipator ever did, adamancipator just abused generic good shit (that actually should be banned imo). Board ended on bsd, herald, dragoon/dpe, baronne and dragite, just like everyone else except eldlitch when halqi, verte and aurorodon were legal together. Ban the bs generic omni negates/removal and leave block dragon alone
1st lol
I am the one guy who plays Kaiser Colosseum. It's an amazing card that shouldn't be banned.
No
No
No.