How did the Sphinx look 5000 years ago?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 เม.ย. 2023
  • Restoring the Sphinx to its original form, as if it was never eroded by time, by referencing artifacts, historical and archaeological references.
    Want your photo edited? Check out: www.photoshopsurgeon.net
    Business Contact: contact@photoshopsurgeon.net
    Facebook: / photoshopsurgeon
    Twitter: / photoshopsurg
    Instagram: / photoshopsurgeon
    Music by Saher Galt: / sahergalt
    --
    More ART made REAL videos: • ART made REAL
    --
    #Sphinx
    #Egypt
    #PhotoshopSurgeon
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 493

  • @DesertSkies120
    @DesertSkies120 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    The Sphinx was DEFINITELY painted in bright colors! A survey of the monuments at Luxor reveals some quite large areas of paint that survive almost intact, especially on ceilings and other areas protected from direct sun, wind, and rain. Ancient Egyptians loved lots of color on their monuments!

    • @soisaidtogod4248
      @soisaidtogod4248 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gary Allen Yup, the forever yellowish tint of sand everywhere.

    • @anonymousposter3570
      @anonymousposter3570 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Egyptians didnt build the Sphinx. It is far older than the Egyptians, a proven fact.

    • @MikeAG333
      @MikeAG333 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anonymousposter3570 You haven't got the first idea of the meaning the word "fact", have you.

  • @seanmc7128
    @seanmc7128 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I would love to go back in time and see ancient wonders such as this right after they were completed.

  • @QuelSalius
    @QuelSalius ปีที่แล้ว +183

    This was pretty good. I thought that you might color it as well, since it supposedly had pigment... 😏

    • @blazinjaden
      @blazinjaden ปีที่แล้ว +5

      are you coming on to the sphynx? 🤨😳

    • @QuelSalius
      @QuelSalius ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@blazinjaden I heard that the Sphinx was painted and time plus environment eroded it.

    • @ge2623
      @ge2623 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blazinjaden Pervert.

    • @banana9106
      @banana9106 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Gary Allen I agree, the uraeus would have been higher and the eyes were sculpted. These are things for which there is clear evidence, but how do they know it had a beard?

    • @gennaterra
      @gennaterra ปีที่แล้ว +5

      True... even Romans and Greeks works were in color.

  • @northernskys
    @northernskys ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Of course, the Sphinx was also brightly coloured with pigments, some of which are still evident on the brow, and it would have been nice if you could have included the uraeus, an upright cobra figure, to finish off the head, since this was a critical symbol of power in Ancient Egypt. Still, a pretty good representation of the Sphinx as it would have looked. Nicely done.

  • @ahmedbbadran4311
    @ahmedbbadran4311 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I'm Egyptian . The Sphinx is very important in relation to the Egyptian civilization. Indeed, there are many miniature Sphinxes found in tombs, and you can see its nose and face that it is close to this, but with a straight nose and a little smaller.

    • @yawos9024
      @yawos9024 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your being Egyptian has no bearing on the Sphinx since your people were not even existent when the Sphinx was built. They cannot white-wash the sphinx. The sphinx has always had very marked negro feature.

    • @AFRICA4AFRICANS
      @AFRICA4AFRICANS ปีที่แล้ว

      F’n STOP YOU ARE ASIATIC INVADER!!!!!! You are a arab!!! The profile is purely BLACK AFRICAN!!!…
      It’s written on the walls carved in stone…THIS IS THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN PHARAOH AHMOSES…O lord help us crush and drive out THE VILE ASIATICS!!! This is on the walls

    • @AFRICA4AFRICANS
      @AFRICA4AFRICANS ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@UlyssesDrax of what????? NOT OF ANCIENT EGYPTIANS(K’MTNU)
      EGYPT IS A ENGLISH FROM THE GREEK WORD…FOR THE BLACK AFRICAN GOD OF KA P’THA

    • @yawos9024
      @yawos9024 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@UlyssesDrax The original people of that land never called themselves 'Egyptians'. They called themselves 'Kermet' which translates to 'Land of the Blacks'. We know some of you try verbal gymnastics by saying it means 'The Black land' referring to the soil, but this is some bs. The who land of Egypt was not black.

    • @yawos9024
      @yawos9024 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UlyssesDrax Are you black?

  • @XenoKnightAlpha
    @XenoKnightAlpha ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Fascinating. I vaguely remember learning that the Sphinx might've been colored too. It makes me a bit curious. Nevertheless, nice work!

    • @SlumberBear2k
      @SlumberBear2k ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I was gonna mention the same thing. think you can still see some of the paint around the forehead.

    • @Gerry1of1
      @Gerry1of1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@SlumberBear2k I thought I saw some red and some blue where the head band would be, too.

    • @kiely4561
      @kiely4561 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think most statues in the ancient world had colour added to them, people ask why the pupils are always missing in Ancient Greek and Roman statues, the simple answer is the eyes were generally painted which eroded over thousands of years

    • @SlumberBear2k
      @SlumberBear2k ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kiely4561 interesting! good point.

    • @lchambers56
      @lchambers56 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's still some color there. At least it looks that way to me, anyway.

  • @janeteholmes
    @janeteholmes ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It would have been painted, presumably in the same colours used in temples and tombs. All those marble statues from Ancient Rome and Greece were brightly painted as well.

    • @BillWoodillustrator
      @BillWoodillustrator ปีที่แล้ว

      Don’t find it odd that no colours are really found on any of those statues though? I mean NONE?

    • @seancdaug
      @seancdaug ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@BillWoodillustrator Exposed paint doesn't last very long, and the newest of these are well over 1500 years old. Besides which, traces of the original pigments often can be detected, at times even visibly so. Faded, but still there in trace capacities.

  • @proveritate9312
    @proveritate9312 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The sphinx is definitely older than 4500 years ! Archeological research shows perhaps anything from 15 to 75000 years. It stays an enigma

    • @michaeldeierhoi4096
      @michaeldeierhoi4096 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only archaeology evidence that supports that claim comes from conspiracy theory wonks trying gain notoriety. And THE ONLY so called evidence is that supposedly the Sphynx has experienced more erosion then can be explained if its age is 4500 years. The problem is that that statement was not based on any evidence of erosion patterns of limestone of which the sound is carved from.
      Further there is no evidence of this alledged earlier culture that supposedly carved the Sphynx. Conclusion:. Any claims for the Sphynx bring significantly older than 4500 years is wild baseless speculation. Have a good day.

  • @rodneyLee336rlb
    @rodneyLee336rlb ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the red-brown pigment is still visible to this day on Hor-em -Akhet ( Heru of the Horizon) which is the original name. Sphinx is Greek and means strangler. Abu - Hol is Arabic and means father of terrors

  • @ajmittendorf
    @ajmittendorf ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There is some incredible computer work done in this video.

  • @norasmith4939
    @norasmith4939 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You can still see the color on the forehead of the sphinx so yes it did have color. Would of been nice to see with the color added

    • @brucebeamon5460
      @brucebeamon5460 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nothing but pale white as ORIGINALLY intended !

    • @Akrafena
      @Akrafena ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@brucebeamon5460 you are trolling, i really almost took the bait there

  • @henryhawthorn8849
    @henryhawthorn8849 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s possible that the Sphinx was originally painted in different colors just like the ancient Roman and Greek monuments, and statutes. It has also been theorized that the Sphinx was originally built at a time that Egypt had lush vegetation, which would have been thousands of years before the pyramids were built.

  • @Larrymarx
    @Larrymarx ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Best restoration to date.... Thank you for taking the time to make and post this excellent video... *I Love It* 😊

  • @rafiamadeo5363
    @rafiamadeo5363 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful work, nice video. Thank you.

  • @evgenipronenko927
    @evgenipronenko927 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done! Extremely impressive! Post more videos like this

  • @chandarussell
    @chandarussell ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I thought you might add the colours. The headpiece in particular was said to have several brilliant colours in it.

  • @johnjones393
    @johnjones393 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's likely that the Sphinx was built by an earlier civilization and Egyptians found it. The head would have been that of a cat and the Egyptians replaced it.

  • @mattrost2574
    @mattrost2574 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've heard several theories that say originally, the Sphinx had a feline head; later resculpted to look like a king or somebody......

  • @Howlingwolf007
    @Howlingwolf007 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok. This is my last comment because I keep commenting in almost every link I go in…because this is just so damn cool. If I had your skills, I’d be doing this for my own entertainment and curiosity. Especially with old ruins and structures. I will be lost in this channel for days, thank you. This is the channel I didn’t know that I was forever searching for! 🍻

  • @Banydian
    @Banydian ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved the transitions and comparisons at the end

  • @cjmacq-vg8um
    @cjmacq-vg8um ปีที่แล้ว +7

    nice job. the human head on the sphynx is thought to have been added later, reshaped from that of a lion's head, as the human head is out-of-proportion smaller than thre rest of sphynx's lion body. its also thought to have been built, like the great pyramid, LONG before the other two pyramids and before egypt even became a "nation."
    personally, i believe these to be the case. "ancient," pre-civilization humanity was much more advanced than we give it credit for. i'll argue that our species has been actually moving backwards on so many levels the last 6000 years, not forwards. its my belief that humanity has been recovering from the collapse of past civilizations 10,000 years old or even older.

  • @dashxlife
    @dashxlife ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the body was covered in sand with just the head sticking out until it was dug up in 1930. It makes me wonder if Romans, Greeks, or even the Egyptians themselves carved the head not knowing how deep it was buried, resulting in it not being proportional to its body. If this is true then the sphinx could be a lot older than we thought

  • @Jan6750
    @Jan6750 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing how over 10,500 years can take its toll!

    • @jandrews6254
      @jandrews6254 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amazing how well it’s lasted, given the climate. Not too many buildings or structures have lasted so well, so long

    • @Jan6750
      @Jan6750 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jandrews6254 Well, being buried helps...look at Gobegli Tepe. 🤔

  • @leobelleobel2007
    @leobelleobel2007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks to napoleon for ordering his troops to hit sphinx face as a cannon training exercices

  • @giuseppersa2391
    @giuseppersa2391 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now this is awesome thanks ❤..

  • @wolfman7393
    @wolfman7393 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thoroughly enjoy this! Thanks you!

  • @northernstar4811
    @northernstar4811 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Sphinx was covered by sand nearly up to its neck for thousands of years until the 1930`s when they finally dug it out. The amount of weathering on the Sphinx is amazing considering it was covered up by sand for so long, so how old is the Sphinx?
    Who really knows...

    • @missscarlett186
      @missscarlett186 ปีที่แล้ว

      The estimated date is was completed is 2532 BC. So over 4,000 years ago.

    • @TheT-90thatstaresintoyoursoul
      @TheT-90thatstaresintoyoursoul ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, that explains how Napoleon shot off the nose so easily back in 1798

    • @michaeldeierhoi4096
      @michaeldeierhoi4096 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Northern Star On what do you base your claim that the Sphynx was buried in sand for thousands of years?

  • @kevincohalan7397
    @kevincohalan7397 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Beautiful job! Next question: what about the theory that the original head of the Sphinx was much bigger than the one we see today?

    • @jlopez3a
      @jlopez3a ปีที่แล้ว

      The sphinx head is way out of proportion to the rest of the body. It's hard to believe the Egyptians would make that mistake.

    • @Jan6750
      @Jan6750 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It was a lion, and 10,500 years ago would have been perfectly aligned with the Leo constellation. That with over 10,000 years of water erosion coupled with the fact that the original megalithic Sphynx temple (on the level of its paws) had an Egyptian temple built over the top of its north west corner!. So for people to say the Egyptians carved it is a bit rich.😏

    • @Jan6750
      @Jan6750 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Xl Bubblehead yep. The step pyramid is built over the top of a deep shaft with a giant granite box at the bottom. There's an identical shaft right next to that bad construction and another three in the immediate area, at the same depth as the Saqqarah tunnel system.
      I posted a video after my visit. You wouldn't believe what is round the back near the car park in a 'dumping ground'!

    • @cpfs936
      @cpfs936 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's what I thought-nice human restoration, but that's NOT the original. The original was either a lion or a jackal. As others have noted, the current human face is uncharacteristically out-of-proportion.

  • @tinovanderzwanphonocave544
    @tinovanderzwanphonocave544 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    there are several mistakes here 1 The Pharaohs always had pierced earlobes 2 The beard of the sphinx was actually found and was of the slender braided variety 3 The whole thing was painted in bright colors 4 The sphinx has remnants of irises in its eyes 5 The thing on its forehead was a cobra diadem and used to have a snakehead that has since eroded away.
    research is valuable in historic reconstructions and, these facts are not hard to find is saddens me that you seem not even to have bothered but went for visual clues only.

  • @kenskinner6948
    @kenskinner6948 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work. Thank you for sharing.

  • @sarahrose5772
    @sarahrose5772 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The recent discussion about the rain and flooding damage on the body has led many archaeologists to speculate it dates back to the Younger Dryas. This would date it around 11,500 bc at the latest. But the face has been recarved since the original construction. It’s absolutely nuts.

    • @MeganThorstensen
      @MeganThorstensen ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I know I'm dying to know what it originally was..

    • @XenoKnightAlpha
      @XenoKnightAlpha ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ahhh interesting, I didn't know about that!

    • @Keznen
      @Keznen ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @nameYUnoavailable It is thought to have originally been a lioness.

    • @maszkalman3676
      @maszkalman3676 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@XenoKnightAlpha Because it's bullshit told by the kinds of "peoples i guess" like Graham HanCuck...

    • @tthomas184
      @tthomas184 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maybe actually read about the Younger Dryas before posting pseudoscience and misinformation.

  • @jeannerogers7085
    @jeannerogers7085 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Delightful to watch.

  • @tellzywellzy1604
    @tellzywellzy1604 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Apparently the original head of the sphinx which was much bigger, was replaced by this newer head that looks all out of proportion compared to the body

  • @lyarrastark6254
    @lyarrastark6254 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job. That looks convincing.

  • @steveafanador6441
    @steveafanador6441 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is gonna be awesome 👍👍

  • @Nobody-cw4wm
    @Nobody-cw4wm ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, good work!

  • @tommywestbrook6470
    @tommywestbrook6470 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent work.

  • @janiceg7661
    @janiceg7661 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing!❤

  • @josephgioielli
    @josephgioielli ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's what it looked like when the Egyptians restored it. That head is much too small for the body. It is believed the original head was a jackal. A larger version of the smaller statues in that area.

  • @khalatelomara
    @khalatelomara ปีที่แล้ว +1

    one of the best videos 😀

  • @Kivas_Fajo
    @Kivas_Fajo ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice time lapse. I would have loved to see it coloured as it was in all its glory...

  • @Leftatalbuquerque
    @Leftatalbuquerque ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks good - now do something about those pores! And a cobra on the headpiece please.

  • @fionalee5177
    @fionalee5177 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely done 😊

  • @haroldsmith3607
    @haroldsmith3607 ปีที่แล้ว

    "The statue was carved from a single piece of limestone, and pigment residue suggests that the entire Great Sphinx was painted."

  • @speakingfromsource
    @speakingfromsource ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work

  • @Desenter_7
    @Desenter_7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really like this

  • @jeffbaxter8770
    @jeffbaxter8770 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beeautifully done. Wow.

  • @alazarano2
    @alazarano2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty impressive!

  • @sergeyandreev356
    @sergeyandreev356 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job, but there are comments on individual fragments. The beard of the sphinx was different - the beard "hebeswt" curved at the tip. The snake had a three-dimensional shape of the muzzle - its fragment is now on display in the Cairo Museum.

  • @SeaBreeze2247
    @SeaBreeze2247 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done!

  • @alechorn1109
    @alechorn1109 ปีที่แล้ว

    Many archeologists believe the original Spinx had a lion’s face which was later recut to replace with Pharaoh’s face. The side view indicates a disproportionate head. Also they know this same Pharoh modified other paintings to replace face.

  • @thecollector5204
    @thecollector5204 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Maybe one day people will see Mount Rushmore the same way we see the Sphinx.

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies ปีที่แล้ว

    It never looked as good as this. It was a highly weathered natural outcrop of less-than-perfect quality.
    They will have filled cracks and defects with mortar to improve the look, and then painted it - no doubt.

  • @lesleyfromkent6938
    @lesleyfromkent6938 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Next version, taking account of comments should be vv good.
    Its beard is in basement of British museum, not on display, and also has paint remnants on it.
    They won't return it, I've been told, until Egyptians agree to reattach it with removable glue, while Egyptian government want it back on permanently..

  • @DrCrabfingers
    @DrCrabfingers ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was fun to watch...but the Sphinx was heavily decorated with bright colours.

  • @freeman8128
    @freeman8128 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This restoration has missed the cobra on the head and the bright colours, traces of which are still visible.
    Much of the damage to the face was done by Napoleonic soldiers using it for cannon practice.

  • @johnvonjasper7893
    @johnvonjasper7893 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice work on the restoration! I would be curious to see what it would look like if the head were expanded to be in proportion with the body. The ancient Monument makers were masters of proportion and on the Sphinx the head is too small leading to the idea it was recarved. My hunch is a chunk of the original limestone cracked off either during or shortly after construction causing them to improvise with what was left.

  • @gfresh353
    @gfresh353 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cool!

  • @Gerry1of1
    @Gerry1of1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Didn't the Egyptians paint their statues? I read somewhere they did. Time to add some colour !

    • @brucebeamon5460
      @brucebeamon5460 ปีที่แล้ว

      YES WHITE OF COURSE RIGHT ?

    • @Gerry1of1
      @Gerry1of1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brucebeamon5460 I doubt it. But the head dress had colours

    • @musicandbooklover-p2o
      @musicandbooklover-p2o ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gerry1of1 He's a troll.

    • @Gerry1of1
      @Gerry1of1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@musicandbooklover-p2o which is the troll? Me or the other commenter?

    • @musicandbooklover-p2o
      @musicandbooklover-p2o ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gerry1of1 The other commenter who continually posts about the original colours being snow white. I've seen exactly the same comments posted on other videos under different names so guessing they are all sock-puppets/trolls.

  • @soyyoroaldo
    @soyyoroaldo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow really really interesting. I’ve always wondered. Very nice to get an excellent guess. Deepens for me what I’ve always felt - that Sphinx makes my skin crawl. I think it is so creepy.

    • @missscarlett186
      @missscarlett186 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it really depicts what the Era back then was like. The Egyptian religion was the main religion at that time, so the Israelites weren't allowed to defy it. The consequences were death, or at least severe punishment to not worship their gods.

  • @c4c4cr0773
    @c4c4cr0773 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is quite impressive. You should try to paint it. It was most likely painted to look more realistic.

  • @33Donner77
    @33Donner77 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good presentation. Probably many of the ancient monuments were painted.

  • @armchair22
    @armchair22 ปีที่แล้ว

    You didn't answer your own question...you just filled in the blanks.

  • @roylcraft
    @roylcraft ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very fun to see! Part of the false beard does exist, it had a herringbone pattern.

  •  ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Sphinx is much , much older than 5000 years.

    • @rustythecrown9317
      @rustythecrown9317 ปีที่แล้ว

      really?... how do you know this?. Ancient Aliens?. lol

  • @friedpuddycatgamer4682
    @friedpuddycatgamer4682 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It can't be 4,500 years old. The water damage, and water erosion surrounding it are caused by either heavy rainful or flooding. More likely 12-14,000 years old.
    You get a great job on the photoshop.
    When it was first built. It was most likely the head of a lion. And the more modern Egyptians changed it to a face.

    • @michaeldeierhoi4096
      @michaeldeierhoi4096 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What evidence of erosion of limestone backs up this claim of a much older Sphynx than 4500 years old?? The general statement you are making is not evidence!!

  • @BB-no9pn
    @BB-no9pn ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful!👏😃😍

  • @FABIO.AYUB.
    @FABIO.AYUB. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Muito interessante... Eu não imaginava desse jeito... Interessante mesmo! Parabéns 👍🏻 Quanto as cores, que as pessoas mencionaram nos comentários, isso eu não consigo imaginar... Grande abraço 👍🏻✌🏻

  • @marmanuri9895
    @marmanuri9895 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maravilloso!!! Me gustaría mucho ver este rostro acabado, como haces con las estatuas y ver como se verian si estuvieran vivos, y también ver la Esfinge con colores.Seria estupendo!!! Muchas gracias!!!❤

  • @gilesa.4052
    @gilesa.4052 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are 'theories' that originally the sphinx had the head of a lion and it was re-sculpted.

    • @rustythecrown9317
      @rustythecrown9317 ปีที่แล้ว

      but they're wrong... no historical data to back it up.

  • @steveafanador6441
    @steveafanador6441 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Incredible 😮😮😀😀👍👍

  • @rguzman5513
    @rguzman5513 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @Sk8Bettty
    @Sk8Bettty 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not from a single block - it was carved right where it stands from bedrock. It’s still attached. Either it was a natural outcropping or the rest of the entire Giza Plateau was leveled off.

  • @bobross1829
    @bobross1829 ปีที่แล้ว

    It probably was brightly painted, as we now know most cultures did that back then. Ironically the "unpainted" look we have for statutes and monuments from antiquity we now assume was based upon people from 1700-recent just did not know that they were painted.

  • @MissHeird
    @MissHeird 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The sphinx now has definite pupils, irises. Why is your depiction void of this? Overall, awesome.

  • @rheffner3
    @rheffner3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've seen this before. Several times. But always cool.

  • @GwynEllisHughes
    @GwynEllisHughes ปีที่แล้ว

    The beard is the wrong design to the fragments that still exists of them. The beard was originally carved with a braided design, and not straight perpendicular lines.
    Fragments of the beard can be seen in the Egyptian museum in Cairo. Other pieces are housed in the British museum in London.

  • @albertcheeni
    @albertcheeni ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo. Very good

  • @marcioramosramos8865
    @marcioramosramos8865 ปีที่แล้ว

    magnifico, parabéns !!!

  • @floydfanboy2948
    @floydfanboy2948 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wonder what the sphinx looked like originally, I mean before the head of a pharaoh was cut out of the original head. The current head is so small and out of proportion with the rest of the body. I bet it was the head of an animal.

  • @Jack-fs2im
    @Jack-fs2im ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing

  • @voceval1
    @voceval1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great work. Now please do the Swedish Sphinx.

  • @nissmoguy
    @nissmoguy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AT THE TOP OF HIS HEAD IN THE CENTER WAS THE SERPENT WHICH YOU DISPLAYED AS A BLOB

  • @Kinship1
    @Kinship1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I reckon it used to be an anubis.

  • @andrenoneofyourbusiness3881
    @andrenoneofyourbusiness3881 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty cool.

  • @Raygo.
    @Raygo. ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually it was the lack of eye pupils and irises that bothered me. Aren't they clearly visible on the Sphinx? But not on your recreation.

  • @plfr8541
    @plfr8541 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good music!

  • @greatdaneacdc
    @greatdaneacdc ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It really looked nice 11,000 years ago

  • @davemmar
    @davemmar ปีที่แล้ว

    I was hoping the uraeus would be reconstructed. I also felt reconstructing the nose would be purely guesswork. But I like the final product and it is probably an excellent interpretation.

  • @GarryOwens-lm2sk
    @GarryOwens-lm2sk ปีที่แล้ว

    The Sphinx's color scheme should have also been attempted, as well as the restoration of the cobra badge on the headdress' crown.

  • @ninarizzo7312
    @ninarizzo7312 ปีที่แล้ว

    How fabulous to see how it originally was! Was it not painted too? Is it possible to see the original colours too? Magnificent ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️😍👏👏👏👏👏👏

    • @johnvonjasper7893
      @johnvonjasper7893 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Faded traces of red, blue, and yellow have been found on the Spyhnix. Must have been quite a sight in its original glory!

    • @ninarizzo7312
      @ninarizzo7312 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnvonjasper7893 It certainly must have been!!!!

  • @davidwarren9204
    @davidwarren9204 ปีที่แล้ว

    Given that everything INSIDE the tombs etc was vividly painted, I''m guessing the Sphynx was probably painted as well (and just wore off over time). That could explain why, for example, there are no pupils etc carved into the eyeballs - they would have been painted on instead. Great photoshopping, BTW.

  • @dominict9418
    @dominict9418 ปีที่แล้ว

    To the Egyption government: Setup a go fund me and let's get it restored.

  • @crixxxxxxxxx
    @crixxxxxxxxx ปีที่แล้ว

    It was in even worse shape when uncovered. Partial reconstruction of the headdress was undertaken. Old photos show it pre-restoration.

  • @leandrosiqueira2540
    @leandrosiqueira2540 ปีที่แล้ว

    O tempo é implacável.

  • @unnaturalselection8330
    @unnaturalselection8330 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me looking at this and waiting for the nose to fill in: "Ok, someone's gonna be big mad here. Who's it gonna be? The Egyptians or the We-Wuz-Kangz-Gang? Cus you ain't making em both happy..."

  • @13gladius28
    @13gladius28 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The blue & gold headress symbolized the rays of the sun on a blue sky background. This could very well have been the initiator of Egyptian civilization & builder of the Great Pyramid behind it as well as other's. The nose would have been purposely broken off by a much later people who wanted to end all ties with the past

  • @margaretasaarenpaa4239
    @margaretasaarenpaa4239 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was very good. I think it had a snake on the top of the head piece. The snake was a symbol of royalty and was only allowed for king or queen.

  • @adapaitsmyname
    @adapaitsmyname ปีที่แล้ว

    Five thousand years ago, it looked exactly the same as it does today. However, what it looked like a hundred thousand and more years ago we do not know.

  • @thomaslong8401
    @thomaslong8401 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine the pressure of working on it. There could be no do overs if you made a mistake.