6 Reasons Why You SHOULD NOT Buy Subaru Forester!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 145

  • @the-best-car-content
    @the-best-car-content  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    🏆Name SUVs that are better than Subaru Forester. 🤔

    🔴6 Reasons Why You SHOULD NOT Buy Toyota RAV4 WATCH HERE 👉th-cam.com/video/GpBBLlqTqxA/w-d-xo.html

    • @1redgate8
      @1redgate8 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What is "better"... either way, I'd struggle to name one...

    • @mmo8988
      @mmo8988 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Forester is the best on this category

    • @mmo8988
      @mmo8988 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed

  • @randyreynolds1045
    @randyreynolds1045 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    My Outback XT goes 0-60 in 6 seconds. It’s fun to drive, and it goes anywhere❤

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup... and I bet that you could lower that 0-60 time just a hair if you had too! But, I didn't buy our Outback to beat it senseless, I bought it to enjoy - and we do!

  • @Intrepid175a
    @Intrepid175a 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Ok, if you're going to complain about the Forrester's fuel economy, at least compare apples to apples. To put the Forrester up against it's hybrid competition isn't close to fair. How does the Forrester compare to the non hybrid CR-V and Rav4? I've got a 2022 Outback that I traded a 2013 Rav4 for. The Rav4 rarely approached it's EPA estimated fuel economy ratings, something that always disappointed me. My Outback has easily matched it's EPA estimates which means it has routinely returned 2.5 to 3 mpg better, across the board, than my Rav4 and that's with the Outback's AWD besting the Rav4's 2-wheel drive.

    • @robertknight4672
      @robertknight4672 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Scotty Kilmer did a review of somebody Subaru Forester wilderness and because the owner had a bigger build the RAV4 was a bit small for him so we went with the Forester.

    • @Intrepid175a
      @Intrepid175a 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@robertknight4672 - My Rav4 was ok, comfort wise, but I think the Subaru is better. Obviously, I'm more satisfied with the Subaru's fuel economy than I was with the Toyota's. The best thing I can say for the Rav4 is I traded it in with 135k miles on it and in that distance, I never spent one dollar on the car for repairs. Nothing ever failed. All the money I spent on the car was simply maintenance related. So far, my Outback, approaching 50k miles, is in the same boat. Time will tell how well it stacks up against the Toyota on that statistic.

    • @jeffjohanson3830
      @jeffjohanson3830 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The non hybrid RAV4 motor also sounds like a piece of old farm equipment. I worked at a Toyota dealership when the current Rav model came out with that motor. As each sales guy drove the car the comments were “oh boy that’s not good” Hybrid model camouflages that a good bit and is definitely a better choice IMO…..but not apples to apples with the Forester.
      I would personally love the boxyness of the Forester in the Outback’s length….with an H6 😆
      I can dream.

    • @jstephens2758
      @jstephens2758 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jeffjohanson3830 Subaru Ascent possibly?

  • @mattsbrute
    @mattsbrute 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I did a lot of research for a couple months on the CRV, Rav 4, Mazda and Subaru Forester. I think the CRV was the best looking of the 4. The Rav was expensive to get the Subaru options as was the Mazda. In the end I went with the 2024 Forester Sport because i wanted the dual X mode and 2.5 engine and loved the black rims. I love the heated seats and Softec seat material. The Harmon Kardin stereo rocks. The engine power is perfectly fine and this is coming from somebody who has owned 2 Corvettes. I absolutely live everything about this vehicle and plan on keeping it for a long time.

    • @richardli5530
      @richardli5530 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Make sure your CRV does not come with free oil dilution. Mine 2019 has it. That was my first and last Honda.

    • @greentermojo
      @greentermojo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@richardli5530you live in the future, we are currently in 2024 in this dimension.

    • @richardli5530
      @richardli5530 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @greentermojo We are all entitled to our own opinions based on experiences. To me, CRV or any Honda with a 1.5 turbo Earth dream engine, is a crap.

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@greentermojo WHAT are you talking about?

    • @mattdecker6791
      @mattdecker6791 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a Forester owner living in snow country, I love the full-time 4wd. However, there are better options out there if you live where the weather is docile.

  • @JoeBuck-uc3bl
    @JoeBuck-uc3bl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    The two things I can’t stand are what this video praises. Turbo charged engines, and the annoying huge infotainment screen that Forester luckily doesn’t have. The Wilderness cladding looks cheesy?? Insane. That’s my favorite part.

    • @robertknight4672
      @robertknight4672 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I like my 2023 base Forester mostly because of its taller height than the outback which gives you a little more Headroom. And I like the large Windows too. My previous car was a Honda Element. I think the Next Generation Forester will end up with that large screen I think the Crosstrek already has it.

    • @stacymai
      @stacymai 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@robertknight4672I went from an Element to a Forester too! Forester was the only one that felt comparable to the Element’s roomy cabin.

    • @comicpilot
      @comicpilot 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Amen! I bought the 2023 Forester because it did NOT have that bid old infotainment screen!

    • @barbarahunter5463
      @barbarahunter5463 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree I also hate turbo charged engines and prefer the smaller infotainment screen

    • @rileydj8764
      @rileydj8764 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      No turbo is a positive, looks are an opinion. Those unintuitive flats screens are cumbersome. Size and functionality are key.

  • @gaildulgar8486
    @gaildulgar8486 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    A turbo? It,s 40 cents more per gallon to fill the tank, and the milage is no better... if you are buying an awd, get your foot off the pedal and enjoy the scenery.

    • @kevinroberts3593
      @kevinroberts3593 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Funny you would say that. I just bought my first Subaru and decided to do just that and mileage has been great. It feels so different with being able to see SO much while driving. I actually can't wait to drive!

  • @meeganwhite944
    @meeganwhite944 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2023 Subaru Forester Sport owner here. I switched from Toyota’s. I had 4 of them over the years, including the Rav 4. I’ve had my Forester for about a year now and I LOVE it. I actually love it more than any of my Toyota’s. I considered buying another Rav 4, but would have paid so much more for the same features. I love how simple the Forester is. It’s very functional. I live in a city and the acceleration is plenty. Gas mileage is good too for the size. Overall, great small SUV and I highly recommend!

  • @Tuan-zj3ie
    @Tuan-zj3ie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Those 6 reasons won't affect me from buying the Subaru Forester. I just bought a used 2020 Forester Touring with 50Kmi. last week, in white with brown leather interior. I'm driving Honda Odyssey and my wife is driving Toyota Highlander. This car will be for my 18yrs old son so he can drive to UofH soon. This will be the first Subaru for me, for my family. After doing a lot of research, I decided to buy a Forester for my son. The main reason is safety and insurance cost. We only have this car for a week and so far, to be honest, I like it very much. MPG is around 29.5 for mix city/hwy driving. It has a lot of custom settings which I like. It has even more bells and whistles than my wife 2017 Highlander Platinum (except for 3D bird eyes view). This car is Made in Japan which I just found out later on. All in all, me my wife and my son like it so far.

    • @mattdecker6791
      @mattdecker6791 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As someone who owns the same exact car since new, along with eight Toyotas during my life, I can tell you this: The subie requires fastidious maintenance. It will also be in the repair shop more than your Highlander. I like the ride, visibility, and comfort but it is more delicate than brand T. Do a complete, 60K service at the dealer before junior goes off to college. It will run you $1600 but will be worth it.

  • @gsctht123
    @gsctht123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    #7 the tail lights are not bright enough.
    #8 the colors are not pretty enough.
    #9 becouse I don't use AWD.
    #10 BECOUSE THIS VIDEO IS WORTHLESS

    • @mattdecker6791
      @mattdecker6791 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed. As a Forester owner, 4-wheel drive is it's forte. If you live in an area where 4wd is not needed, there are much better, robust choices.

  • @geraldthompson4633
    @geraldthompson4633 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Comparing any faux jeep or junky escape to a Subaru tells me all i need to know…loon review

  • @geraldthompson4633
    @geraldthompson4633 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Moral of this sad comparison…buy a forester or an outback…nuff said

    • @dragracingwithmary3051
      @dragracingwithmary3051 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I bought a Forester, I love it. I heard all about the acceleration being on the slow side. I dunno if they were all trying to race the Forester or what, but it has plenty of acceleration for me & I have a heavy foot on the pedal.

    • @geraldthompson4633
      @geraldthompson4633 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@dragracingwithmary3051 seemed good enough…hoping it’ll be the next car in our household

    • @joesteel
      @joesteel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dragracingwithmary3051 same here, saw lots of videos and passing ability on freeway, hell it has same horsepower as my bmw 325. Acceleration is not not even an issue. I put my wilderness on sport mode and have no issues passing cars on freeway and I drive 70ish to keep with flow of crazy trafficc. Mileage isn't the best and gas tank could be larger (I wish), That's my only complaint and the small short seats, otherwise I am happy with it. yes could be better mileage an horsepower but after 6k miles I'm fine with it. I can point other things but yeas, reviews aren't that helpful.

    • @dragracingwithmary3051
      @dragracingwithmary3051 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@joesteel I am averaging 35mpg in my 2024 Forester, that's a huge plus for an SUV that isn't a hybrid. My speeds on the highway are between 65 and 80, depending on which highway I am on & the speed limit.

    • @joesteel
      @joesteel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dragracingwithmary3051 I haven't checked honestly, I drive around 68-75 at most as traffic here in California is crazy. I refill every week at about half a tank full so I maybe spend 30 bucks a week on gasoline. I commute only a couple times a week. 3 days max. 48-50 miles round trip.

  • @hereszonny7411
    @hereszonny7411 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Just traded in a 2002 Forester with OVER 400,000 KLM's on it, Done well for the Wife for over 18 years without any issues and now with no more Footy training & Game Days, Dance lessons & Dance Comps believe the BRAND NEW FORESTER should see us into Our 80's😊

    • @johnstrand2247
      @johnstrand2247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The new ones are not near as good as your 2002 but good luck.

    • @zwkzmzbt
      @zwkzmzbt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you have engine oil consumption issue on 2002 model?

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My 2000 went 340k miles. Multiple expensive problems all at the same time, or I would have kept it.

  • @denniss1211
    @denniss1211 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Why should I drive an engine burning turbo? I am on my 4th Forester and have NEVER had a problem with any part of the Forester. I have no problem at the Montana 80mph or in town in heavy traffic. Maybe you should spend some real time in a very good and reliable car .... Non-Turbo Forester !!!!! I had some real choice words for you but ... I am a gentleman.

    • @Alan-z7i6t
      @Alan-z7i6t 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Those without the turbos are just sore LOSSERS.

    • @cookiemaster4145
      @cookiemaster4145 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Alan-z7i6t not everyone wants a turbo toy than will die quicker means a DISCARTABLE VEHICLE in short period. turbo put more effort to the engine . means less live time motor engine. NOT everyone wants to RACE YOU on the street. and you shouldnt really try that without the police noticing you , it seems you are pretty young to NOT understand subaru forester is a safe, reliable car, than wont let you down . ITS NOT a racing car. its designed for confort and safety. NOT TO CRASH by being a fool kid trying to ride it like a fast and furious movie.

    • @BorderTurrets
      @BorderTurrets 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Car reviewers are insufferable at times. Like yes, an economy vehicle is not going to have a 300HP engine, get 40 MPG, and look like an Acura.
      If you want a performance luxury car obviously you dont go with a Subaru. However, this vehicle is outstanding for its segment. This vehicle would run you 39.8k at Honda while I can walk in a subaru and get this for 10% off MSRP because the Subaru dealer network isnt filled with greedy animals.

  • @scottanthony3426
    @scottanthony3426 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I've been all over this segment (compact SUV) as I search for the replacement for my Forester XT. The bottom line seems to be that it is difficult to get everything in one place. Towing for example. The CRV Hybrid actually loses 500 lbs to the 1.5L turbo CRV, and is only rated for 1,000 lbs. If you opt for the Wilderness edition of the Forester, you can tow up to 3500 lbs. The stock RAV4 hybrid tows 1750 lbs. Maybe the Woodland is higher, but you do lose some mpg (ditto the Wilderness, as it's shorter gearing kills highway mpg). If you like some of the all-weather aids, you can't get fog lights (factory/dealer) on a CRV or CX-5/50. Honda even teases you with little chrome accents on the lower grill. And btw, the "go anywhere" CRV Hybrid does NOT have a spare tire, but instead a tire repair kit. Useless if you gash a sidewall or have anything bigger than a nail/screw sized leak. Not confidence inspiring if you use your vehicle for light off-roading. In this price range, most everything is somewhat of a compromise between price, reliability ratings, mpg, acceleration, useable cargo area, back seat room, etc. Apparently the electronic only AWD works fine in the RAV4 (rear wheels only driven by electric motor. A clever idea to eliminate the drivetrain, but when the roads get really slick or mud/snow gets deep, is it as good? Haven't seen anyone really address this.) Right now, the '24 Foresters are discounted (at least in my region) as the '25's are about to arrive. For a similarly equipped RAV 4 hybrid, it is several thousand more. (Comparing the Limited with 032 package) and the payback on gas savings is on the order of 10 years out if you drive 12K per year and use gas at $ 4.50 (regular in my region now). The CX-5/50 are just as sluggish as the Forster, unless you opt for the turbo versions, then expect combined 25 mpg. And cargo space, rear seat space are compromised. So, choose your compromise.

  • @Gr8Notion
    @Gr8Notion 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I’ve had mine for 3 years. Still love it. Never had any issues and I’m keeping it for a lifetime

  • @carlrasmussen3267
    @carlrasmussen3267 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Shopping for any car is an exercise in compromises. You can't get a car with every advantage. Subarus perform quite well, however, you'll need to adjust to a few of the things mentioned in this video. Personally, I don't flash and flare. My '14 Forester and '16 Legacy are more than competent vehicles. I even enjoy changing my own motor oil as the filter is on top of the engine.

    • @tgwoolshire
      @tgwoolshire 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How do you dispose of the used oil?

  • @mstack1949
    @mstack1949 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    They're showing you a 2025 Forester - not the 2024.

  • @bkstarkey
    @bkstarkey 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’ll take spartan cabins as long as the view lines remain. These cabins provide unrivaled views.

  • @mmo8988
    @mmo8988 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Forester best compact SUv for the price range

  • @KDTom-wp9ys
    @KDTom-wp9ys 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    CONSUMER REPORTS RANKS THE FORESTER BEST IN CLASS

    • @mikeheckman4995
      @mikeheckman4995 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That’s why I’m considering the purchase.

    • @MorZa85
      @MorZa85 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikeheckman4995 me too

  • @mattdecker6791
    @mattdecker6791 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I own a 2020 Forester Limited. It requires fastidious maintenance and has been down for repairs several times. It is sure-footed but delicate.

  • @joecolombo6110
    @joecolombo6110 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I owned a 2015 Subaru Forester, both the resonator and muffler had to be changed at only 30000 miles. Not long after the rear calipers seized so both calipers, discs and pads had to be changed. I gave up on it and traded it in.

  • @billbradley2480
    @billbradley2480 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I paid cash for a new Forester in 2015. I’ve never heard any sounds coming from the CVT. It’s 9 years old and no maintenance issues at all yet. I replaced the battery at yr 7 even though it was still working ok.

  • @floycewhite6991
    @floycewhite6991 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's your choice. More power or higher MPG. Pay ten thousand more up front for a hybrid, or spend $50 more each week for gas. Real-time all-wheel drive or a little better MPG but some slippage before AWD kicks in. Turbo power or natural aspiration that gives longer engine life and a little better MPG.

  • @whitelotus1594
    @whitelotus1594 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I guess getting 34 hwy mpg's in my 2023 isn't enough.

    • @Hallowsaw
      @Hallowsaw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Idk about you but every subaru i have owned does horrible in city mileage. My 2011 legacy 3.6 only gets 16-18. My outback 2.5i 2017 only gets like 18 at best in the city and my crosstrek gets about 21

    • @whitelotus1594
      @whitelotus1594 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Hallowsaw yeah I get about 21-24 depending on where I am. I get the highway numbers from the 6 hour trips I go on regularly.

    • @nuenevoie
      @nuenevoie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hallowsaw bad oil inside the engine. even if its 0w20. its making a difference from one brand to another.

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hallowsaw We get 19 - 20mpg in full city driving with our '22 Outback Limited XT (it's a TURBO, turbo haters!), which is a bit higher than what we got in similar driving conditions with our previous 2010 Chevy Malibu 4cyl/6spd auto. And that car was almost 500lbs lighter and FWD only. Oh, and mixed driving around town with our OB? 22 - 23mpg, and highway (interstate driving)? We can break 31 - 32mpg with no difficulty (MPG measured at the pump, NOT by MPG computer). Just don't take Interstate 75 during the Christmas holidays.... 😡😠😠😡😡

    • @Hallowsaw
      @Hallowsaw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nuenevoie i change oil 4k miles and we drive 40k miles a year between all 3. I use penzoil ultra platinum 5w30 on the 3.6, and 0w20 on the trek and outback. You are assuming i do not take care of my cars. I strictly follow maintenance and do a lot of things earlier than most suggest. Tires before they get to the wear bars, diff and trans at 30k ext.

  • @hanglooserecluse
    @hanglooserecluse 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m still driving a 2007 forester and have been for the last ten years. I love mine

  • @cihangirkavuncu859
    @cihangirkavuncu859 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anything you mentioned in the video l know and accept when l buy Subaru for the last 25 years. It is like my family l accept with all defaults. Because Subaru saved my wife's life. I would not change it if even consumes 15 lt per 100 km. I feel safe with Subaru. I am also pushing my son for Subaru since they plan to have child near soon. Hopefully l can succeed.

  • @freddy2141
    @freddy2141 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ❤FORESTER TOURING 2023 !!! #1 SAFETY AND ELEGANT SUV ONE OF THE BEST 🎉

  • @philiplucht3198
    @philiplucht3198 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Every time I drive an Outback as a loaner car at my dealer, I realize I like driving the Forester much more, the increased height, the best visibility.

  • @kathyduncan4954
    @kathyduncan4954 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I LOVE my 2025 Forester Premium!! Outbacks look like a station wagon. I went with Suburu for their safety record.

  • @drewsmith-kf2nv
    @drewsmith-kf2nv หลายเดือนก่อน

    I loved my 2019 Subaru Forester Sport and I was getting 36mpg in it until someone ran a red light. When I had a solid green light on my side of the road and wrecked my 2019 Subaru Forester Sport totaling it. The person admitted that he ran the red light and hit me in the intersection as I was going across. He hit my 2019 Subaru Forester Sport so hard it spun my 2019 Subaru Forester Sport 180° and I hit another vehicle on the opposite side of the intersection while they were sitting at the red light with the back end of my 2019 Subaru Forester Sport. But I was getting 29mpg on the city without getting on it and just cruising in the city. And on the highway is where I was getting 36mpg just cruising down the highway to my work. So I was getting 3mpg while I sit my 2019 Subaru Forester Sport on regular cruise control. That is how I was getting 36mpg on the highway.

  • @jstephens2758
    @jstephens2758 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If you have already decided you don't like something, it is easy to find a way to justify it. I agree that the Forester is under-powered. But the rest of your complaints are purely personal preferences. Is Mazda better? Try using the rotary knob control while driving. And its better looks? That beautiful candy apple red paint that is usually shown costs hundreds of dollars extra.

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well said.

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now that the carmakers are suing to end CAFE, Subaru should bring back the 3.0 liter 6-cylinder engine.

  • @gilioidable
    @gilioidable 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had until it was totaled a 2022 SFW. Everything you say is true. I loved it anyway and the look, but it was drone-sounding and not fast.

  • @wallyjohnson2375
    @wallyjohnson2375 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We just did an 8000 mile trip in our 2020 forester sport. It did fantastic. So I don’t agree with anything you have posted.

  • @corwind3888
    @corwind3888 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    And here we were complaining about how the CVT drones on and on...

    • @tommymas1
      @tommymas1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😅

  • @alfredodahik5639
    @alfredodahik5639 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hello! I respect your opinion, but I don't share it. At least on the last point, the SF design, goes with the times. It can't be left behind. Although I personally prefer the 2024 model. Regards.

  • @cjmaslowski1112
    @cjmaslowski1112 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For everyday life they are perfect and practical

  • @KissellMissile
    @KissellMissile 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Anyone who compares a petrol car's fuel consumption to the hybrid version of their competitors is just making content, not giving any serious analysis.

    • @AR-tl5cd
      @AR-tl5cd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree.

  • @TimmyToes1955
    @TimmyToes1955 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have both an Outback (2018) and Forester (2020) and I would take the Forester over the Outback every time. The Forester is 'taller' and has much better visibility. It's easier to drive and park in most cases and it's better for our 80 pound yellow lab due to it's taller cargo area. The Outback is great also, but just doesn't drive quite as well, in my experience,

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try a Gen 6 (2020 to present), and you'll change your mind. I easily took my '22 outback Limited XT over ANY Forester, any day.

  • @minuteman048
    @minuteman048 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bunk! and again I say bunk!! Have3 a 2021 Premier and it is plenty peppy with decent acceleration. It maintains highway speeds above 70 mph without having to downshift as my 2011 Hyundai Santa Fe did. The transmission does not drone and although it is a CVT transmission it feels like it has shift points like a standard transmission and I have heard others make this same comment. I have to agree about the low towing capacity of 1500 lbs. but my research says that you should not tow with any CVT transmission. I have a Ford F250 if I need to tow anything.
    Am annoyed that on my lower level model i cant get blind spot sensors, but it does come with lane departure and collision avoidance sensors. Lastly On a higher level model I can scroll through the info center and see what my engine temperature is, but not on my level. Cant understand their thinking something that should be standardized on all levels. The usb ports are hard to get to being tucked away and recessed.

  • @airmanma
    @airmanma 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Not everyone wants a station wagon. I love my Forester.

  • @cjmaslowski1112
    @cjmaslowski1112 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lots of information and this made a lot of sense I still like the Forester the size and capabilities fits my life style

  • @NOYFB
    @NOYFB 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish they would sort out the bluetooth on the entertainment system so that Apple Watch Bluetooth doesn’t interfere with the music from your iPhone.

  • @randyreynolds1045
    @randyreynolds1045 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Turbo is needed❤

  • @smilemoney
    @smilemoney 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reviewers always push for more. I believe a lower price like the Maverick started out would attract a nice market share.

  • @davidbrosseau1129
    @davidbrosseau1129 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wow. I clicked on this looking for some useful information. I got a poor example of false equivalencies. I won't bother clicking on any of your videos in the futures. Oh... and I'm all for constructive critiques but this is just really biased.... ah.... brake bias... hmmmm.....

  • @keithb9272
    @keithb9272 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You're talking about the 2025 Forester that's not even out yet! I just traded in my 2021 Forester Sport for the 2024 Forester Sport. Believe it or not, the 2024 Forester's engine actually work fine and is quick if you know how to drive! They have a sports mode that gives you the power you need!

  • @cjmaslowski1112
    @cjmaslowski1112 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think they are well build suv and if you want more power buy a V8 gas guzzler

  • @SuperQdaddy
    @SuperQdaddy หลายเดือนก่อน

    U can get a 2013 forester with 110k miles for 4k ..good condition...❤ yes !..dont waste your money on new cars folks...

  • @etothej
    @etothej หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Disregard this video and buy the Forester. You won't regret it.

  • @markweber7110
    @markweber7110 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey, I love my Forrester. No issues at all American vehicles are junk.

  • @Alan-z7i6t
    @Alan-z7i6t หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SPORT in name only

  • @car24dude
    @car24dude 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Subaru has a true full time AWD, not like Toyota.
    Who really needs that much power. Speed in only good for speeding tickets.

  • @pratchmg
    @pratchmg 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Try saying something simple like "there's no spare tyre so if you get a flat tyre, you're fucked". A repair kit won't help you if you tear the side out of your tyre and you don't have coverage to call someone for help.

    • @jensha8898
      @jensha8898 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In almost 30yrs of driving cars, i luckily never needed a spare tyre. But in the last 4 yrs i needed the compressor from the repair kit 2 times because of screws in the tyre… so i could fill up the tyre just with air and could drive to a garage to repair the tyre.

    • @robertknight4672
      @robertknight4672 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know about the 2024 model year but with 2023 and earlier all Forester trims came with a spare tire. Full size spare tire for the Wilderness trim compact spares for everything else.

    • @jensha8898
      @jensha8898 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertknight4672 here in germany is just a 2litre hybrid version of the forester available…the place for the spare tyre is blocked with a high voltage battery.

  • @alanrosen2662
    @alanrosen2662 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love my forester wilderness!!

  • @jamesvokral4934
    @jamesvokral4934 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Agree Outback may be a better option for some Subaru buyers.

  • @derekhanson9915
    @derekhanson9915 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh and turbo charging a small engine sounds great but turbos are another major thing to go wrong and strand you. Turbos make the car less reliable, another thing to go wrong. I’ve seen way too many Subarus needing major repairs way way too soon.

  • @efs83dws
    @efs83dws 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This video seems to have absolutely no idea what people want. Other than a larger engine, nothing else mentioned in here is anything I would want. I prefer the switches, knobs and buttons over a touch screen any day. I just bought the 2024 Outback Wilderness, but I like a more traditional layout in the inside of a vehicle.

  • @daviddupper9728
    @daviddupper9728 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love my 2020 Forester!!😊😅

  • @danielroberto9183-w8j
    @danielroberto9183-w8j 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Forester is a competent, time tested compact SUV whose shortcomings are quickly surpassed by its virtues of value, roominess, outside visibility, ergonomics to name a few. The Outback is a fullsize station wagon on stilts and cot comparable to the Forester that once again is a compact suv, compact as in small. I don't own a Forester nor do I work for Subaru or hold stock in the company, But your video lacks knowledge and research.

  • @andriusduksta5744
    @andriusduksta5744 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dafuq is this? It sounds like this video was made in 2012, not 2024. So much inaccurate nonsense, simply misleading...

  • @RoSaWa386-33
    @RoSaWa386-33 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also, be aware - AWD drives require perfectly matched tires. If you have a flat or puncture 5 or 8000 miles, the tread and weight of 3 tires are mismatched to a single new tire. This isn't always the case, but be away - some drivers have bought 4 new tires because of one nail in one tire. sigh

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So, what's your point? Do you know that almost ALL CAR MANUFACTURERS OFFER AWD IN THEIR PRODUCT LINES?

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 หลายเดือนก่อน

      On the other hand, as long as you keep your wheels aligned and rotate and balance them, tires last 2-3 times as long as on a front-wheel-drive car.

  • @billbradley2480
    @billbradley2480 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    TH-cam superstar Mechanic Scotty K. Says to avoid turbos.

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And he'll say ANYTHING to generate controversy and clicks. Meaningless.

  • @bahhaziz
    @bahhaziz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1 reason why you shouldn't watch this TH-cam channel 🤷🏻‍♂️ it has less than 100k subs

  • @derekhanson9915
    @derekhanson9915 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve own two Super boo boo’s. Junk engine design that hasn’t changed much over the decades. When the engine starts to leak oil which is common for these, it drips right onto the exhaust manifold smoking you out in the cabin. My mom has a new one and at 22k miles the engine was totally rebuilt and she did maintenance perfect. I have many friends who own them. Head gasket leaks, burning oil way to soon and rebuilds for them too. While these drive nice and yes the Outback is better, same engine, I will never own another one.

    • @Homepageturned
      @Homepageturned 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Older models?

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Homepageturned Don't pay any attention to @derekhanson9915 - Subaru-hating troll that is lying through his teeth.

  • @deanliu5378
    @deanliu5378 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Totally disagree

  • @sunset3052
    @sunset3052 หลายเดือนก่อน

    all 6 reasons are subtle to me

  • @olusesiak6664
    @olusesiak6664 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Forests Note 😂

  • @maimongil
    @maimongil 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    #7 no turbo, why subaru don't bring back the xt model?
    #8no hybrid model or plug-in!.
    #9 no forester full electric

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      XT will return in '26, hybrid will be coming soon (using the Toyota hybrid drivetrain), and who wants a full electric? Go buy a Tesla - we'll laugh!

  • @speedypete3725
    @speedypete3725 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    180 hp is enough for me!!!

  • @tommymas1
    @tommymas1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who wrote this crap? Such drivel. 😂😅

  • @kelsey809
    @kelsey809 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s a Subaru, and Subarus rattle.

  • @johnhoffmann7250
    @johnhoffmann7250 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jeep is a shit box.

  • @sarkisseywaz2127
    @sarkisseywaz2127 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You want fast Subaru buy wax
    Are you nuts

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Subaru Outback XT models are no slugs by any measure, either. I've made fools of several Honda, Toyota, and Mazda drivers that wanted to 'play'.......

  • @leoleopud771
    @leoleopud771 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    poor text
    poor English

  • @bennyvo5045
    @bennyvo5045 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New subaru forester has so much electrical problem

    • @eskieman3948
      @eskieman3948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are a liar. It does not.

  • @POSS99
    @POSS99 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wouldn't buy outback. Subarus are garbage

    • @nuenevoie
      @nuenevoie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      too general. maybe you need to reconsider

    • @gergnotsloh
      @gergnotsloh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Enjoy your Nissan Altima.

    • @Homepageturned
      @Homepageturned 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@gergnotsloh😂 exactly!

  • @mstarr3469
    @mstarr3469 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The 25 forester is a dissapointment. It use to be a good value price wise. The price increase for the 2025 model is not justified. Theres plenty of 2024 available. Why pay more for the same car. Its underpowered dated dash it just a bad refresh

    • @v.voravann3761
      @v.voravann3761 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Other brands are raising their price too.