270 vs 30-06 - SHOOTING STEEL
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ย. 2018
- Truly appreciate you watching the videos!
Which will shoot through the steel???
Support us on Patreon / whoteewho
Heavy Metal: / heavymetalpaul1
Impact ear protection: amzn.to/2KxJNy4
SUBSCRIBE HERE: bit.ly/2xQ9ap2
243 vs 270 How Many Paper Plates: • 243 vs 270 - How Many ...
Canon G7x Mark ii camera here: amzn.to/2Gvv3gh
Eken action camera here: amzn.to/2Lee7yD
Instagram / mrwho_tee_w. .
Twitter / mrwho_tee_who
Facebook / whoteewho
SnapChat @WHOTEEWHO
270
.270
270win
270 winchester - กีฬา
![บุษบา - วงชานเมือง [LiveCoverVertion] Original : เมนทอล](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Dm81sKcd9rs/mqdefault.jpg)
Truly appreciate you watching the videos!
Which will shoot through the steel???
Support us on Patreon www.patreon.com/whoteewho
Heavy Metal: th-cam.com/users/heavymetalpaul1
Are the legs on the bipod supposed to be straight one to the other
Huh?
@@WHOTEEWHO well cause I got a bipod and the the crosshairs on the scope are tilted to the right and I took it back to the gun shop and he said that they make them out of soft metal so you can bend it around is that true or not
Not sure i understand. Are you talking about the scope or a bipod. The scope lines are supposed to be 90 degree angles from eachother
@@WHOTEEWHO talking about bipod making my crosshair not straight and gun shop saying that I just have to press on it and bed it around
Everyone, both of these rifles have plenty of power to take a wide variety of animals. Instead of arguing which is better, get out to the range and improve your accuracy. At the end of the day shot placement is more important than whether you are using a 270 or 30-06
Definitely agree, but let's not pretend that the .270 isn't a ballistically superior cartridge. To argue otherwise is as foolish as denying that the 30-06 is capable of lobbing heavier bullets.
@@funkingitup1805
-06 hits harder! Definitely within a few hundred yards!
I think shot placement on the steel may have influenced the hole punching. It is hanging like a pendulum and with almost equal energy , velocity , and cross sectional area the resistance to the steel moving maybe the deciding factor. A longer lever is easier to move so striking the plate near the top would potentially increase its resistance to moving allowing the energy to be more concentrated at the point of impact instead of moving the plate? Just thinking about potential reasons the 06 didn’t make holes. The area is only about.013 square inches more on the 06 and with more energy it had to be close... what is the rate of twist on the rifling? Could that also be a factor?
@rusty nuts 2 inches is not a lot of difference at 400 yds
@rusty nuts Actually, Per the Winchester boxes, both 150 gr, it's only a 2.4 inch difference @ 500 years and less than an inch difference @ 400 years. Look at 1:54 of the video.
If you're testing deer rifles on steel plates ,the deer you're after are way smarter than the ones I go after ,they never wear armour!
270 shoots flat don't and don't care much about wind … see my comments on this video ? take care / JF
Use 50 ap rounds
@@ethanosborn7353 If I could afford it I'd use AP incendiary so it would cook the meat on the way through 😁
😂😂
LOL!!!!!
us 270 people who prefer to keep it quiet about how good it actually is otherwise everyone will have them
😆😆😆🖒🖒
lol
Yeah! If you can't kill it with a.270 , FIND A PLACE TO HIDE
I love my m-77.... always wondered if going though steel like this is even what you want when hunting. would it be best to transfer more energy or just go clean through? does it matter most what you are hunting?
on a day like today I could hit a quarter at 150 yards, cold bore. that takes practice with what you are using, which makes you best with what you are using, which makes what you are using best for you at that moment so all debate is senseless..... wow. now my head hurts and I want a nap....
You're missing .030 thou on your number k thanks 😉
your upper shots had the support of the chains where as the lower shots did more to move the target....so where the bullet hit makes a differeance
And the first shot I think the steel hit the log and couldn't flip
@Deplorable Covfefe yep that's the reason ! silly test really
@Soaring Hawk Generally, the idea is to not shoot holes in your steel targets so letting them swing is useful.
Yep. 30.06 hits lower.
Yes you are correct.
270 has greater sectional density, so this accounts for the penetration. The 270 will generally have less wind drift, and shoot flatter too.
Fondel Maddick bigger the bullet less effect wind has on it..
The gravity is the same but the drag is not. The slim .270 will have less of a decrease in velocity because of a better drag coef. and therefore it will drop less as it's exposed to the gravity for a shorter timespan even if they have the same initial speed.
The wind drift will probably be less too but the bullet must be longer so I don't know how much. When talking penetration of steel the slim bullet will deform less steel and therefore penetrate easier.
For practical hunting, both are fine and very similar
@@samhollan4570 maybe the heavier the bullet the less effect wind has on it is what you mean? if both bullets are the same weight then the one thats more aerodynamic in the direction of the wind will be less effected
have you actually measured wind drift with both cals ? or just shooting from the hip ?
There are very few bullets available in 277 cal, but the options for 308 cal is huge. There are almost no high BC bullets for 277. You can get 308 cal bullets with over 500bc at about 175gr. The 175 smk is one and the 178 eldx is another. The most aerodynamic bullet I've shot for 270 is a 145gr eldx by hornady. Because of the 1:10 twist rate, some rifles don't like the 145eldx. Most 270's shoot 130gr class of hunting bullets best. That's what it was designed for. The 270 is not a long range cartridge. It was designed to be fast and flat out to about 300 yards. It does it well. It's not a very good long range target shooter though. The 3006 with a 178eldx and 24 inch barrel will shoot out to 1000 yards.
That Weatherby is a good looking rifle.
Sure is!
Got one in markV
And accurate as hell
For versatility and as a reloader, my preference has always been the 30 cal fodder. It comes in soooooo many more bullet types and weights and for really long range accuracy it handles the 200 grain stuff where the 270 falls on its face.
good point … its a tool chose the right tool for the job .. see my comments on this video JF
I have a .270 and a 30-06. I like them both. Killed many deer/hogs with both. Pick the one that you like and go with it. You can't go wrong with either.
You got it right
Michael S Well said Michael both with do the job if you do yours Lol (with respect)
I do believe the .270 is a 30-06 necked down , there really isn't that much difference except the .270 I think is like 6.9mm and the 30-06 is like 7.62, I wouldn't be afraid to take any game with the .270 they make some hard bullets now nosler partitions would penetrate the largest of game. I knew a guy that shot a deer with one in the front with a .243 and it exited the rear end . I also know people who take deer every year with 220 Swift's, and 22-250s and they drop where they stand.
they compliment each other more than they compete. 2 truly great American calibers!
@@taisontaison4118 Dude no one cares. Its all about preference. Especially when they both almost perform the same.
When you hit the plate between the chains you have a target with more reason not to move and not absorb the energy through movement, therefore a higher tendency to leave a hole. Between chains it's held in place better and with more weight (chains) to help hold & keep it in place better.
So once again the key to success is placement over power. In simplest terms yes I agree. There will always be those annoying x factors like barrel length, powder type, grain weight, polymer tip vs monolithic core vs lead vs accu-bond vs hollow point etc, in the end the best advice is to get out there and test for yourself what works.
The first shot, the 270, had a log behind the plate. The second shot that flipped, the 30-06, had nothing behind it.
Exactly what i was thinking kinda sad he didnt put the log back cuz that .270 has some power
the 270 actually probably hits harder with the 150. Even though at the muzzlel it's somehow slower with win ammo, problem like usual the powder charge amount is arranged for new scopes
2nd shot 270 nothing behind but hole in metal 06 just dinged it
@@michaeldart5522 The energy transfer doesnt care if theres a log behind the plate. The bullet transfers its energy into the plate long before the plate even has a chance to move.
The amount of energy expended by the 30-06 shows that if you had equal barrel lengths you would most likely have had all three of the 30-06 bullets penetrate. The longer barrel does help in things like a penetration test as you do not start losing energy as soon as a shorter barrel.
You didn't mention that the .270 was developed from the .30-06. Really just necked down from .30 to .277 inch diameter. Both excellent calibers. I own a old Sears .270 (built by FN, Fabrique National) with a modern scope. Very accurate and plenty of killing power.
I got winded just watching you huff and puff, thanks for the video man
🤣🤣🤣 thanks for watching Big Al!
"I've only got 15 minutes, and I got about 30 minutes worth of talkin' I'd like to do"
😆😆😆
That was great man! Love the comparison videos! Thanks!
Thanks for watching!
I always love your comparison videos. So much fun to watch! After the video I wold prefer 30-06 simply because of the variety in bullet weight and type. But I would be happy with either.
Thank you for another fun video! Versatility is why I chose a 30-06 back in 1981. I had started reloading and realized that companies like Sierra offered .308 diameter bullets from 110 grains to 240 grains. They still list 40 different .308 bullets. It turns out I've only ever shot 125 gr, 150, 165 and 180. I still have that Ruger M77 with the tang safety and have never thought I needed another rifle. If I had chosen a 270 I'm sure I would think the same. Both are excellent choices.
thanks for watching!
What I found interesting in the comparison with the 150 grain round is the 30.06 had greater velocity in the first 100 yards, but the .270 had greater velocity from 200-500 yds. Impressive.
great video, loved how you showed the ammo box and it’s flap side too so we could see the grains. also smart that you looked at the primer side of the ammo to make sure it’s a 270, they look very close to 30-06 and it would suck to fire the wrong bullet by accident!
This video was a whole lot of fun to watch !
Excellent video !
5⭐
Thanks Jerry!
.270 is my "ALL" time favorite. Cool video & comparison. Thanks for sharing with us. - Marco
270 is awesome!
270 sweetness is hard to beat. I have both, but i love my 270 ( I built it from a Remington action) when it puts venison in the freezer. They are both tackdrivers. The last three years I have used the 270, giving my old ‘06 a well deserved rest. BTW, I’m looking for a 25/06 to round out the trifecta. Heck, I just love em all!!
One of your best!!! Different rounds, different purposes. Like them both!
Enjoyed the comparison. Both are among the best available deer hunting rounds!
Great Work WTW!!! Beats the Gym any day :-))) Fresh air Shooootin!!!
Thanks for watching Mark!
the typical m-1 grand round goes 2700 fps.. the 30-06 having a slightly larger dia. produces more dwell time or "splash"..thats why it spun it around..when going through steel.. SPEED is what you want.. the 140 gr. although being 10 grains lighter,still has superior "sectional density".. compared to the 30 cal..the weight is "behind"..the point of the bullet,rather than " around " it..GREAT VIDEO!
"Garand"😁
308 marlin express 160 gr
Love your passion dude! Had to subscribe!
Thank you so much Brandon! Appreciate you watching!
i really enjoy your videos they give good info to me i would like to see alot more 270 winchester VS videos
I really appreciate you watching! More 270 vids coming soon! Plan to get it out this weekend
Try a video with an m1 grand vs m14 vs mosin nagant that would be a great competition.
Have always preferred the 270, great long range caliber, drops everything with authority,good video my friend
Thanks for watching Gabriel!
Great job man, this is the kind of thing everyone wants to know about different calibers, but never wants to take the time to do.
Thanks for watching!
Great video as usual keep up the good work love your channel bro
Appreciate you watching!
Try mounting the plate solid A lot of energy is dissipated by the plate swinging and that depends on where the plate is hit. Too many variables
on the first shot there was a log piece placed behind the steel that prevented the target from flipping. Why not on the other shots
Oh just out having fun, not necessarily going for perfect science experiments ;) thanks for watching!
Very, very cool check-in many thanks!
thanks for watching!
Very cool really thought the first two were going through . 👌🏽
My favorite is 130 grain extended range boat tail bullet Remington in my 270
Shooting off a Lead Sled 50lbs of weights ! What was I normally shoot in Ruger mark ii stainless boat paddle ! Started shooting Hornady it tighten the group up about 1/2 inch at 100yrds ! Remington 130 gr was shooting just over 1 in groups windy, rainy day ,hot ,cold dead calm it matter just over a 1 inch ! Shooting just over 3/4 inch group have shoot 4 back group's mic .764 ,.772 ,.788 and .798 off inch ! Where the Remington shot 1.21 ,1.12 ,1.24 and 1.15 ! First group shot Rem. Cooled then Hornady's so not like i being unfair ! They just shoot better !! Not a big price difference !
I admire how you can still get on target after running up and down the range out of breath lol and having fun doing is the most important thing there is with firearms next to safety
I agree! Thanks Lisa
You have a new subscriber, just a simple fun and informative video. Very cool.
Thanks Bart!
Thanks for the video
270 savage for me, i have both but after shooting the 270 that’s my go too , never missed with it and drops deer instantly without ripping up your meat
Nothing is guaranteed to drop anything instantly! I’m so tired of hearing this.
No surprise. The 270 and 30-06 loaded with the same bullet weight or close to the same bullet weight the 270's smaller diameter bullet makes it a longer bullet than the 30/06 and that gives the 270 greater sectional density which gives the 270 greater penetration. If you try it with the same barrel length it will be the same results. The 264 win mag which is a 6.5 caliber has an even longer bullet with the same 140gr. Weight bullet and will penetrate deeper than the 270 with the same bullet weight. Greater sectional density means greater penetration.
Jason Simone yes & no. On game yes , but steel is different. Steel is mostly about speed & surface area , but weight & sectional density plays a role . Ballistics is a really full on subject with lots of things going on in a very short amount of time. Like we've seen on some of whotee's other vids like the hard cast 45/70 ones. Hard , heavy & slow usually will out penetrate on water & game . & I have found the 45 Colt from a carbine with 250gr rnfp hard cast @ 1100fps over penetrates & punches nice holes that pump out lots blood . But steel = small calibers, light to medium weight & as fast as you can push them seems to work. The 257 Weatherby magnum using burger 115 - 120 gr with full power loads has been the most impressive I've seen to date from a normal weight hunting rife @. 400 yards. Try it you will be amazed.
Wrong. The 6.5 don't have the velocity, and 2800 fps is pushing it. If you want to hit something hard you need to swing it faster.
@@ScreamingReel500 Wrong SD coeficient is the main thing for penetration ,not speed.Slow and long 9x39 Vintorez rounds have great steel penetration.Also nato Uranium armor piercing bullets have great penetration because big weight of uranium incrase SD coefficient .
SD-SD-SD: You can't compare "sectional density" of copper to steel or uranium because each has different weigh, the heaviest will have smallest bullet. SD is comparing between calibers. Bullet has to be fitted into certain size at the neck of the cartridge that is where you calculate SD. If "Who_Tee_Who" do the test with that same bullet weigh of a 6.5 Creedmoor, I doubt it will go thru the steel plate due to it slower speed. You need the weigh and the speed to penetrate the steel, in this case 150 grains, and the 6.5 has the least power. Steel bullet still requires certain speed to punch to something hard. That's why velocity equates to energy.
@@ScreamingReel500 Speed,speed,speed....im telling you.SD is matter not speed.Big weight,long bullet, and small caliber ,small surface of inpact......that penetrate steel.Speed is matter ,but SD is more important.
This is the video I've been looking for thanks
Thanks for watching Quinn!
I'm loving your channel. You got my sub
Appreciate you watching!
I’m with the 270 anytime any day. I’m proud to own a 270wsm.
👍👍 gotta love 270
270 wsm or 270 win?
You need to polish the feed ramp on that .06. Or service it. Or get it serviced. I don't know...
A newer Ruger such as that should not have that much difficulty feeding off the shelf ammunition.
Just need to feed from the magazine. Loose feeding will cause the round to begin feeding outside of design parameters.
You have way to much fun.lol Very good video all in all.
Thanks Randall
Great video thanks again
Try this test again, but after each hit, respray the target so you don’t get confused.
30-06 my favorite round. Sort of been passed over for the moment by 6.5 and other calibers. It will come back
benavrahamyitzchak a family friend. Has a 1903 Springfield rifle chambered in 30/06 -6.5 mmWild Cat . 26” heavy target barrel. Conservative But Quality Scope with very high quality bases and rings ( steel scope btw) action is smooth as babies hind end ( jewled with costume 1.75 lbs trigger. 12 lbs rifle . He shoots vultures 1,000 yards away with it also shoots 3 shot groups @ 300 meters with it one ragged hole. Carved his sported stock by hand . He also uses magnum powder in his loads . Heavy projectiles. He won’t tell me the barrel twist. ????? Super nice , accurate rifle.!!!!!
6.5 will never surpass the 06.. yea it shoots flatter but doesnt the power of the 06
I got mine and love the sharp bump you feel when it goes off
The chains ARE giving some HOLD BACK, keeping the steel in place longer. Great video.
Thanks for watching RICKY!!!
I personally use a .270 as my full-power rifle because it's what I have. Living out West, a flatter trajectory is desirable but I'd be happy with a .30-06 as well. My Remington 7600 likes 130-grain Federal PowerShok, 1-2" groups at 100 with a 1.5-4x Leupold. The trajectory advantage .270 has over .30-06 only shows up with 130-grain projectiles.
The problem I see with this test is you will get different results depending on where you hit it because the plate moves at different resistance levels depending on where the strike is. If you hit it lower the plate acts more like sloping armor. That is why all the holes are up by the chain.
Your videos are awesome ✌️ and informative 😁
Thanks for watching!
Awesome video!
Thanks for watching John!
My son tommy who is 5 stops his breakfast to watch your vids
Awesome! Thank u guys for watching!
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏Train up a child in the way he should go.
Awesome kid💃😎
Better than playing shooting games... actually learning a little
Been hunting with 270 since I was 14 never had to track a deer anywhere and hunted with 3006 never track anything head or neck learn how to shoot your rifle
👍👍
Exactly
Either ur only 15 now or u haven’t shot many whitetail past 100 yds facts
Your head shorting deer
Good job is always love the video next time throw in a 308 with those two and it'll be great
Awesome video!! Got a new sub!
Hey thanks so much! Appreciate you watching!!!
This was a great video showing the powerful and sometimes questionable 270 has the moxie to kick some serious skeptics on this round.
If a 270 can go through 3/8 plate steel that's enough to impress me
Great job
I would love to own a rifle with either of those rounds but I would lean to the 30.06 due to being everywhere....Good testing....Good stuff...
Thanks for watching Scott
@James_wingthwong_ Banks Thank you for the info as I do love the old Rem 700's and I am a Ruger fan...I just don't own one due to not making my list for next purchase as when I went deer hunting I used my .3030 Marlin and being in CA the hunting here in So Cal is not so well and don't have time to take a real hunting trip right now....
However during the last ammo shortage, can anyone tell me what box of ammo was always available at any Wal-Mart hmmmm, the Red headed stepchild the 270.
Scott F. 30.06 is a walking cane I have a Remington 700 classic 270 I shoot hornady 130 grain ballistic tip bullet it is a killing machine never had a white tail run from it dead in their tracks
@@kennethchewningjr1236 Thanks for the info...I will take a look at the .270....
If you shoot higher up on the target between the chain mounts it don’t flip out of the way so quick, in saying this if the steel target was solidly mounted they would all go through. You will also notice the top of the target is more secure, thus making the target more solid.
Love my 270 WSM just scored on a nice buck this past weekend opening here in south Texas
Awesome!
270 is superior to 30-06 in most, not all, situations. The 270 shoots flatter over greater distances while maintaining a higher velocity over greater distances.
Yeah but that is only relevant if you are trying to shoot longer ranges. Most of my deer are within 30 yds 😆😆😆
Judah Lion Judah that’s your opinion!270-never beats the 06.
Dan Coker agreed...love the 270 but it will never be the 30/06
@@saltcreekammo im just loading some 240 gr bullets for my 30/06 now haven't used this size yet looking forward to it
WHO_TEE_WHO then use a 30-30 why blow your meat all to hell
Shooting the plate at the lowest point has less chance to pierce the plate. In the area just above the chain supports has a better chance to pierce! I like the 270 vs the 30/06 ,probably the 30/06 has more athority. ,but modern amo has changed a lot of test results ,270 is first choice in the weatherby
Good point
My friend Red dropped a Deer at 100 yards with a 22 long rifle Solid Point , i was there to see this !! He practiced shooting at pennies and dimes at 40 yards with a 3 x 9 scope . He always shot in the ear or between the eyes .
I believe it
Couple points I see just after the 1st 06 round, on the very first shot you had a chunk of wood backed up to the plate that was not in place for the 06 shot, also the further down the plate you go from the chain attachment points the more the bleeding off of energy will be apparent. The 06 round definitely had a deeper sharper dent in the plate, but it was closer to the line between the two chain bolts. I think if you were to chrono both rounds you will find the velocity is different than what the box says. I have been told by steel shooters that velocity is what puts the hole in the steel more so than bullet size.
I love both of these calibers. I had a custom Mauser made and couldn't decide on the caliber. I decided on the .280 Rem.
Should have got the 130 grain 270 it’s over 3 Thousand fps
Yeah that’s what I use for deer
At 10 minutes into the video, is that a body wrapped up in a sheet leaning on a tree? My .270 is my favorite hunting rifle.
That is part of a dryer that I blew up
Yep, body wrapped up in a sheet at 10:01
Great video!!
💥💥💥
6:15 There was no holes in a plate ,because it did not have any support from the back ,but hanging in the air.To check it out you need to install the disc on something harder than thin air. It could be piece of wood or even sack of sand that gives a resistance of coming bullet and strenths an impact. Objects hanging in the air it bounces the bullet away and stopping from penetration.Try that way.
This test is meaningless. You need to secure the metal plate so that it cannot swing. When you hit the lower section of the plate it just wings away. When you shoot the upper part of the plate it cannot swing as much, and as a result the round penetrates the plate.
Securing the steel would guarantee that all of the bullets would go through and it would ruin the target. Just out having some fun not trying to have a official science experiment
Not looking for definitive answers, just loads of fun.
Otto Leisering most of his shots hit top center, and yet the plate still swung...? I don’t see your point
Otto,I don't believe any test is meaningless,as we are having a great discussion over it. What we ate looking at and seeing,is that no matter which one we believe is the greatest,they are so similar that they are both great,in their own right. If the round whether. 270 or the 30-06,whichever one fulfils its duty for you,it's the greatest. This discussion over which one is,fills many of deer camp stories and will continue to do so as long as both are still around. That's the magic of it
Any excuse to take a deep breath and start pulling the trigger is fine by me. I am not married to any brand or caliber as long as it can do the job.@@stevenwalters5352
I like them both. The 30-06 is a little more versatile but only on bigger animals especially if you reload. Not sure what you expected shooting the same bullet weights. Someone below already mentioned sectional density so I won't rehash that. Kinda put the 06 at a disadvantage (not to mention hitting it low made the target flip rather than penetrate.) Some 180 grain bullets would have been interesting to see. That's all I shoot out of my 06. You can get 220 grain 06 if you look. Fact is though, I have both and think they are 2 of the best cartridges ever produced.
Thanks for watching David
theres a critical velocity depending on the steel, i think pitting starts around 2850 fps for ar500. if you want to put holes in it, drop the bullet weights and up the velocity.
I really enjoy your videos and thanks for sharing with us and I must mention there is no doubt your viewers are very knowledgeable of this topic. And after watching many videos I feel at the end of the day I would buy a 30-06 . Cheers 🇨🇦
Nice video..270 forever !
Thanks for watching! I need to get the ol 270 out more
Every animal that I’ve hunted with my mossberg 30-06 has dropped in its tracks unlike my boys 270 they always run and drop about 40 yards from where he shot them
I like no tracking
Dropped several deer in there tracks with a .270
Jason Villalba I’ve dropped a 400lb sambar on the spot with my .270.. if you shoot one with a 338 win mag in the ass it’ll run, if you shoot it in the neck with a 22LR. Shot placement is everything and if you can tell the difference between how a deer reacts to a .270 and .30-06 you’ve got some special senses, both have the same energy behind them..
Higher velocity equates to greater energy. So now people who said shorter barrel will perform the same as long barrel can go and do their test again. Thanks for sharing.
Great video
The 30-06 not penetrating, in my mind would suggest its imparting more of its energy into the target. There for more stopping power. Great video.
I agree with ya there.
The load you are using for the M1 Garand is the modern day equivalent of the M2 Ball load of by-gone days. The velocity is much less than the other loads you're using.
Could someone do a test with the Remington model 700 25 06 vs 6.5 creedmore
My dad gave me my grandfather's 30-06 pump action years ago and I never shot it till this year because of the ammo shortage .
It's my new favorite range toy !
Is 30-06 easy to find today because I’m thinking of getting a 30-06 rifle
The first shot with the 270 had a block of wood behind it. That would explain why the plate didn't flip all the way around.
The other shots, the wood wasn't back there.
Doesn't the 270 have a "flatter" trajectory? 😎
Yes.
nice shooting
WHO_TEE_WHO I love your videos brother. Thank you.
Thanks for watching!
For squirrel hunting I prefer a 50 Caliber.
Me too!
To much gun? No such thing!
270 my preference more flat shooting
Great video brother.
Thanks Randle
I'm outta breath but I'm having fun" 😂😂
😁😁😁
I've never fired a .270, but I own a Savage 111 in 30-06. I took a 180lb. hog in Central FL last August. 125 yds. just behind the left shoulder. The shot was clean, and removed both of its lungs (they were hanging out the right side of its ribcage) on the exit. That hog ran 20 yds. and dropped. I waited about a Marlboro before I approached it. Here's the hilarious part. When I approached, I had my 9mm pistol out, it got up and charged me. It dropped again about 5 ft. in front of me, as I'm screaming at it to get on the ground and show me your hands, at the top of my lungs. (Can you guess what I do for a living?")
Shot a hog pushing 250 with my 270 shoulder shot blew him up and dropped, shot a hog around 300 behind the shoulder free handed walking dropped him.
Oh I get it...you're an airline pilot
I told a friend if mine that my .270 will punch a hole through steel with hunting ammo and he didn’t believe me so I can show him this now 👍
Awesome
Which steel animals do you usually go hunting for?
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
I definitely enjoy watching your videos... You do some odd comparisons and tests but I find them interesting... I have hunted with both the 270 and 30-06 and I love them both and think they both bring alot to the table... I am now wondering if you compared the 130 grain vs the 140 grain in the 270 and compared the 150, 165, and 180 in the ought 6 how they would all compare... Also would like to see how a premium bonded stacks up against a standard cup and core bullet... Keep the videos coming...
I've shot a,.270 most of my life hunting whitetail deer and hunted with the a 30-06 about ten years. I've had to track well shot deer,about 75% of the time. When shooting a 30-06, I can hit them a most anywhere and I haven't had to track any of them. That's the difference,I've experienced. Also,every. 270 I've ever had,didn't like 140 grain bullets.
Im with you. Ive shot deer with 270 and most have run about 50 yds with good shots
@@stevenwalters5352 I defiinitely agree the 30-06 seems to drop animals a bit quicker than the 270 on shots other than the high shoulder... When I decided to try out another rifle cartridge a couple years ago I took an interest in the 280 Remington. Factory ammo offerings are not nearly as good as the 30-06 or the 270 but it shoots flat and hits hard and if you enjoy reloading, its a wonderful cartridge that I enjoy more than any other cartridge i've ever shot. But If I had to pick just one do all cartridge I'm going with the 30-06...
Both awesome calibers! Sweet video, I’m a fan of .270 rifles as that’s what I’m building for long range, but I love both guns
I love em all! Thanks for watching!
I love the .30-06, but I chose the .270 for my needs. It shoots very flat and it is a potent caliber. Nearly achieving magnum ballistics if loaded hot. I usually shoot the Hornady Super Performance 130 & 140 gr rounds and they both have a muzzle velocity over 3,000 fps. The .270 is one of my favorite calibers and if it is too small I have the .444 Marlin and .45-70 as well for the larger game.
Wise choice. A .22LR, a .270, and a 375 H&H are all you need for any game on Earth. A 30-06 is what you choose if you can have only one rifle that is overpowered for woodland deer hunting, and ballistically inferior for plains hunting.
That means all of the energy was expended in the steel plate with the 30-06: not a bad idea, better knockdown power on a steel plate! 🙂
Thank you so much for the video i loved watching it 270 all the way
Thanks for watching!