@@catholicphoenix7969 He's was a Jesuit and the first,( or one of the first) who wrote an entire philosophy on religion and evolution in the 1920/30thies. Anyway, i noticed your comment and that's why i mentioned it .
I love IP, he’s a brother in Christ. But, he’s not really talking about macro evolution which is what a Christian like myself rejects, he really is talking about adaptation, a species adapting to its environment which no one rejects
@@neymarjr_.That's a horrendous thing to say and I really hope you're just trolling. The Bible is clear that God wishes everyone to be saved, Jesus even cries because he understands that not everyone will choose to be with Him in Heaven forever, and heaven not being crowded makes you happy? Acknowledging that very few people will get saved is *not* the same as _hoping_ that not many people get saved. Both InspiringPhilosophy and William Lane Craig would absolutely disagree with your stance here and would rebuke you.
What is interesting to me is how when you read Genesis 1 through a scientific perspective, it seems to strongly reflect the order in which life came into being. It starts out, for example, with life beginning in the oceans; which science supports. In the same verse, it also hints that birds or otherwise “raptors” were the first animals to dominate on land. That could possibly reflect the time of the dinosaurs. The following verse then describes God creating animals such as “livestock”, keeping with the scientific consensus that mammals flourished after the time of the dinosaurs or “great birds”. There are a few other examples I can list, but these are the ones most keeping with the video’s topic.
Young Earth creationism accepts the basic premise of atheistic Darwinian evolutionary theory: that creation and evolution are mutually exclusive and could not have occurred simultaneously. To me, however, evolution in its most basic sense is evidence FOR creation, and thus for God. I can only imagine how insulting to Him it must be when YECs suggest that He didn't have the wisdom and foresight to give His creation the ability to adapt for their survival.
You seriously only commented this because you came from his TH-cam channel. This presentation has nothing to do with Christianity, but rather that there is objective meaning to life.
@@notmuchtoseehere.9862 or what if there is god, but not the christian god, the islamic god or the hindu god. The god which actually created this universe and the god we haven't yet found out.
The question dosent matter because the Bible says God made each animal and its babies and reproduced after its own kind. Genesis 1:11-12,24-25 KJV And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. [12] And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. [24] And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. [25] And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
@@BrunoCardoso-dp3bd so a universe which can not support life don't evolve carbon based life,is it worse than our universe? That one isn't designed and this one is designed? Just because u denote importance to conscious beings and specifically to human beings?
@@BrunoCardoso-dp3bd no thats not it. That's ur arbitrary standard. You value life,you're life therefore a life sustaining universe is better or a life sustaining planet. It's not objective.
He is using a lot of big words to say that god and evolution are not mutually exclusive conceptually. Great, no one who knows how modality works and the implications of the immaterial doubt that it is possible in any absolute sense. However, when he rattles on about processes he is not an expert in, on a platform like this, and through things like equivocation and a misunderstanding of key philosophical concepts, I would claim he makes the idea look more plausible than it has any right to be....I would be lying if I said that does not annoy me just a tiny bit.
"""he makes the idea look more plausible than it has any right to be..."""" There are Christian Biologists, Muslim biologists, Jewish Biologists. The existence of God is not fundamented in scientific porbabilism but on philosophical reasoning. Science cannot measure God in the same sense that a thermometer cannot measure sound
Wow, this man's philosophy is... Inspiring.
Do you happen to know the philosophy of Teilhart de Jardin ?
@@spiritualanarchist8162 no, I can't say that I've heard of them.
@@catholicphoenix7969 He's was a Jesuit and the first,( or one of the first) who wrote an entire philosophy on religion and evolution in the 1920/30thies. Anyway, i noticed your comment and that's why i mentioned it .
@@spiritualanarchist8162 I may look into him. Thanks
@@catholicphoenix7969 Sure , who knows. Oh, and it's Teilhard de Chardin...Not jardin. Have a nice day .
Why isn't this more popular? It's literally Michael Jones!
Because the default position of atheism is how many online signal their intellectual superiority.
@@woundedchildstory3172 HAHA
Comrade, we have the same profile picture
@@leovere Well hello there, brethren.
@@mpleandre
Mejor aún, ambos hablamos español
I'm agnostic and this guy is the best Christian apologist online. I may disagree with him, but his arguments are always well thought out.
Jay dyer is far superior this guy is a good bridge for hardcore rationalists tho
@@LiMitZplusIn what way
@@LiMitZplusJay Dyer denies natural law, how could he be superior to IP??
@@literallybest4482 why evolution isn’t an empirical theory
This needs more views 🥺
Criminally underrated video
I was there for this- last thing I did before California was locked down before Covid. This talk was basically the only thing worth seeing!
Michael Jones, as usual, is brilliant…!
Good Job!
I love IP, he’s a brother in Christ. But, he’s not really talking about macro evolution which is what a Christian like myself rejects, he really is talking about adaptation, a species adapting to its environment which no one rejects
He literally said everything evolved from a common ancestor, how is that not macro evolution?
The fact that Michael Jones' TED talk only has some 40k views whereas CosmicSkeptic's video has over 200k doesn't bring me much hope
Let them be, I don't want heaven to be crowded
@@neymarjr_.That's a horrendous thing to say and I really hope you're just trolling. The Bible is clear that God wishes everyone to be saved, Jesus even cries because he understands that not everyone will choose to be with Him in Heaven forever, and heaven not being crowded makes you happy? Acknowledging that very few people will get saved is *not* the same as _hoping_ that not many people get saved. Both InspiringPhilosophy and William Lane Craig would absolutely disagree with your stance here and would rebuke you.
At least it's only a five to one ratio; it could very easily be worse.
Based Inspiring Philosophy
Incredibly based
yes
What is interesting to me is how when you read Genesis 1 through a scientific perspective, it seems to strongly reflect the order in which life came into being. It starts out, for example, with life beginning in the oceans; which science supports. In the same verse, it also hints that birds or otherwise “raptors” were the first animals to dominate on land. That could possibly reflect the time of the dinosaurs. The following verse then describes God creating animals such as “livestock”, keeping with the scientific consensus that mammals flourished after the time of the dinosaurs or “great birds”. There are a few other examples I can list, but these are the ones most keeping with the video’s topic.
yooo IP did a ted talk???!!! i mean i totally disagree with him but its still cool. i like him.
I like him too even though I’m an agnostic and don’t think any religion is true, I still find his content interesting.
@@notmuchtoseehere.9862 Is there a reason why you're agnostic?
Young Earth creationism accepts the basic premise of atheistic Darwinian evolutionary theory: that creation and evolution are mutually exclusive and could not have occurred simultaneously. To me, however, evolution in its most basic sense is evidence FOR creation, and thus for God. I can only imagine how insulting to Him it must be when YECs suggest that He didn't have the wisdom and foresight to give His creation the ability to adapt for their survival.
Yes you still believe in the evolutionary theory and higher intelligent at the same exact time
Yo
Science/evolution is catching up with your faith/truth.
its way pastt it man. lol
You seriously only commented this because you came from his TH-cam channel. This presentation has nothing to do with Christianity, but rather that there is objective meaning to life.
well what u mean by OBJECTIVE meaning? gotta be God right?
@@notmuchtoseehere.9862 or what if there is god, but not the christian god, the islamic god or the hindu god. The god which actually created this universe and the god we haven't yet found out.
michael don't miss 😎
IP ❤️
IP!
dejeis de aser anuncios
😯
Never trust those who speak at TED.
IP is not the same like the rest he truly is Inspiring
The question dosent matter because the Bible says God made each animal and its babies and reproduced after its own kind.
Genesis 1:11-12,24-25 KJV
And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. [12] And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
[24] And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. [25] And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
So just provide evidence that life was programmed into the laws of the universe and we can move on. Until then, there is no reason to assume this.
Only that you are here Writing this.. Oh, i forgot we Are only a random product of nature.. There is no logic at all
@@BrunoCardoso-dp3bd so a universe which can not support life don't evolve carbon based life,is it worse than our universe? That one isn't designed and this one is designed? Just because u denote importance to conscious beings and specifically to human beings?
@@whydontyoustfu yes.. Thats it 😏
@@BrunoCardoso-dp3bd no thats not it. That's ur arbitrary standard.
You value life,you're life therefore a life sustaining universe is better or a life sustaining planet. It's not objective.
@@whydontyoustfu 😂😂😂 do you love your family? Is that objective?
He is using a lot of big words to say that god and evolution are not mutually exclusive conceptually. Great, no one who knows how modality works and the implications of the immaterial doubt that it is possible in any absolute sense. However, when he rattles on about processes he is not an expert in, on a platform like this, and through things like equivocation and a misunderstanding of key philosophical concepts, I would claim he makes the idea look more plausible than it has any right to be....I would be lying if I said that does not annoy me just a tiny bit.
Can you give examples of his equivocation and misunderstanding of key philosophical concepts?
"""he makes the idea look more plausible than it has any right to be...""""
There are Christian Biologists, Muslim biologists, Jewish Biologists. The existence of God is not fundamented in scientific porbabilism but on philosophical reasoning.
Science cannot measure God in the same sense that a thermometer cannot measure sound
@@HaecceitasQuidditas Sorry but no. Just saw your comment and it has been awhile since I saw this video. I am not re watching it.
@@VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz I have no idea how you think that I was saying something about science measuring god
I love the beginning of this why do you exist while I can tell you it's not to kiss some deities but I promise you that
this is why tedx is a joke
why is it a joke ?
you're a joke
One man's opinion and nothing more.. so life continues
@12345shushi I haven't watched those, should I?
@12345shushi Bill gates is such a Marxist Bolshevik ! 😅