AMD FSR 3 is Here... it's INSANE | Forspoken Benchmarking
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2023
- AMD's newest upscaling tech is here and let me tell you... the performance gains from it are absolutely insane. AMD GPU owners are finally in for a taste of that sweet frame-gen tech that Nvidia owners have been lucky to have already.
We try the new tech out in one of its currently supported titles, Forspoken, to see if it lives up to the hype.
All testing was done at 1440p. - เกม
![[UNCUT]"เศรษฐา" โดนบีบให้ลาออก เผยดีลลับ "ทักษิณ" ต้องต่อโปร ไม่งั้นเจอจุดจบ! I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XlH3k81dxmE/mqdefault.jpg)
Sorry guys, forgot to mention that this testing was done at 1440p.
It works amazing!, without artifacts, very good feeling of latency, I was surprised in my tests, good video!
hoping for good results on cyberpunk, but i'm worried it won't scale the same
Subscribed and looking forward to your cyberpunk test with fsr 3. I myself really cant wait to see what fsr 3 can bring to the table regarding path tracing performance.
Full path tracing will be rough I bet on anything other than a 7900xtx. Currently with my 6900xt I think I get less than 30 frames even with FSR2 lol, we'll see!
@@JarboeGaming yeah I will check it out too. a few months ago i got my hands on an xtx. now standard rt is more then doable but must admit path tracing looks really good in cyberpunk. in other games i dont really care about rt.
Have you tried the Preview drivers with the Driver level FSR3? i have played a bit in cyberpunk with that, the frame increase is not huge but its smooth and seems bugfree
No I will need to check this out!
not only AMD GPU owners , but Nvidia GPUs as well an insane performance boost with my rtx 3070 I7 8700 old effing cpu lol.
I was on an i5 2500k until more recently than I'd like to admit lol
I got a 7900xtx and its epic.Seems most with 7000 series love it and most complaints are people with 5000 amd series or nvidia cards i seen.
Yeah no complaints on my 6900xt paired with a 5800x3d, excited to see what future titles are like, ESPECIALLY Cyberpunk. That's the only title I truly feel like im missing out on not having DLSS on. FSR3 looks like it's poised to fix that and it's only going to get better!
No complaints here with my RTX 3090. Went from 83fps to 165 fps 1440p FSR3.0+FG set to Quality. The image is also alot better than expected. Not bad at all AMD.
they gave you the feature that NVIDIA should have given for atleast 30 series owners so yeah it's kind of insane how well it works with all vendors.@@jotunheim5302
Got the 7900 xtx too, and it seems to work like a charm, but i personally need to try it in CP:PL before I give my final judgement. But this looks promising.
@@miklznoh man im really curious how path tracing turns out on the xtx with fsr 3
Everybody who's going to test the demo you need to do four things to see how good the technology actually is.
1. Turn on vSync
2. Turn off motion blur
3. Have a native frame rate of at least 60 FPS(around 70 is ideal)
4. Lower The rotation speed of the camera to .7(The game sets its mouse sensitivity way too high and it makes the technology look worse than actually is)
I was a little bit skeptical at first but after I made sure all of these things were in place I was blown away. Its almost indiscernible from native frames and I don't personally notice any latency even though I dont have access to antilag+
Thanks for this, very helpful to everyone
it is kind different on my side when I turn on the vsync, it causes the game to a bit, so I turned off it, and now it works very smoothly
I use RX 7600 + R5 5700x
vsync should be off
@@nxm3162 I'm seeing mixed reports on this, I would say to try both and see what has the lower frametime.
If im getting 60 or 70 already then frame gen is pointless to me.
Im really excited to test this out, I have a 3090 TI and I can’t way to see this in action.
Me too, but some way I fear Frame Gen is restricted to most recent GPU (because of tech limitation)... I really hope FSR3 won't let us behind like DLSS3.
@@taskend I just tested the demo for forspoken. 1440P Ultra settings, Raytracing, FSR 3, Quality mode and I was getting 145-167 FPS ingame. Around big areas 122-140fps, I’m a believer now lol 😆
@@TheNewGamePlussgood lord. Sounds great
@@TheNewGamePluss Yes! I tested this on my 3090 non Ti and maan it was amazing. Here's to hoping everyone implements it because it is a game changer.
@@maesde Brother it is, is sad that nvidia is blocking this (DLSS 3 G) exclusively to RTX 40 series. This is a game changer, just need this on starfield and cyberpunk 2077 asap lol
DAMN!
Yeah fitgirl repack versión runs flawless ❤
will fsr3 work with every game in the future or only some games? Kinda waana test it on apex legends
Someone else mentioned that currently, on 7 series cards, you can already enable it on any DX12 titles at the driver level with new beta drivers
Insane performance, jesus. Which resolution did u test it?
Sorry I should've included that! 1440p
This needs to be in Starfield ASAP
And Cyberpunk! Going to be amazing
If you've got a 7000 series GPU you can use FMR from the driver in Starfield or whatever other DX12 game
AFMF is not the same as FSR 3. @@demrasnawla
It's a shame they reccomend at least 60fps to avoid latency. I feel like the sub-60 is what needs boosting the most. past 60 I can still feel some difference but diminishing returns kick in
We can't complain
For frame gen. But fsr 3 is useable. I think
As a Radeon owner you never had a chance to expirience a DLSS FG, me as a RTX 3080 owner i din't get that chance either xD
Xd but now you can thanks to AMD because Nvidia claims it's impossible on your card
Amazing video, it'll be more amazing if they debut FSR 3 to a more relevant game rather than this trainwreck of a game
Fingers crossed for Cyberpunk soon!
AMD all the way up
I tried it on the foreskin demo at 4k on a 7900xtx. I was not impressed by the feel of the mouse movements. I don't know if DLSS3 is the same. but this is no game changer.
i had 160 fps on high 2k but it felt like 60 or less why
I've read to make sure v-sync is enabled, which is normally disabled, when using frame-gen with FSR3. Give that a try
@@JarboeGamingYep that's way better with VSync
@@Mr.Dumas1 Awesome, good to hear!
@@JarboeGaming It's not necessarily vsync but capping the fps below the new avg fps that you get with FRS3+FG that seems to do the trick.
@@retrosimon9843 This makes perfect sense, appreciate the insight!
fake frames are never as good as the real ones. This tech has a lot of potential but im really worried that it will become standard industry practice to launch a horribly optimized game because you know you can just inflate the framerate with frame-gen. Then every game just has lots of artifacting.
Yep we've already seen benchmarks with DLSS enabled in the past. Definitely coming.
That's exactly what's going to happen more and more broken games only a few comes completed
@@JarboeGamingthat's what nivida was saying about the future it's just going to be fake frames etc
Can you turn this on 580?
Unfortunately no :(
@@JarboeGaming Shame
It should on Linux. You need to set env var VKD3D_FEATURE_LEVEL=12_2 to launch options. It worked for me on GTX 1660 Ti and Steam Deck. Proton Experimental bleeding-edge got fix for FSR3.
For me it sacrifices smoothness for less artifacts too much. 100 fps with fsr 3 is less smooth than 50 for some reason.
Try messing around with vsync, I'm seeing folks saying that it can either help or hurt you. I would try on/off and see what feels better.
@@JarboeGaming Immortals of aveum doesn't have that problem. Even at 70 fps fg look good.
@@JarboeGaming i tried with vsync and with stable 75 fps works awesome.
Yeah right, higher number means automatically better... now look at the frametime graph... You tested it in static benchmark without any user input, so can't tell shit about how it really performs.
Input lag is over 100ms with base fps of 60.
Frametimes are all over the place, thus the game doesn't feel smoother, unless you limit fps externally.
Well, I can tell you that in gameplay currently, im seeing 8-17ms of frametime with FSR3 off, with it enabled frametimes are averaging between .2-1ms.
@@JarboeGaming that has to be wrong... That's like 10x reduction... Counter might be reporting frametimes of generated frames only. Just look at the graph, not counter.
@@Antagon666 Will do, I was watching someone streaming the game and they were getting much higher, like 10-15ms with it capped at the time I was watching. Regardless though I think this is a massive win seeing as this is AMD's first attempt at true frame generation tech and will only get better.
@@JarboeGaming it's pretty wacky right now... Hopefully it's just incompetent developers and not fsr3 itself. Otherwise it feels okayish with locked frame rate.
People, this tech is amazing no doubt, but stop being blind. It's 100% clear that it has major artifacting in some areas. Actually, as far as I can tell, except for ghosting there's been no improvements to the upscaler itself. There's still major flickering, and popping objects. Look closely at the city area of the benchmark, I mean jesus that shit looks fugly. Still, framegen itself is a gamechanger and I can only imagine fsr 3 the upscaler is only gonna get better with updates and the modding community. Just don't stop criticizing where its due
Pretty sure that flicker is from FSR2 upscaling, not frame gen.
That artifacting is because the default sharpening is to high when you set it at 0.20 which is less than half the defaults it's a big difference while testing at 3440x1440p there was a small amount of artificing that I acutely just forgot it was there it's that small same with ghosting it's also very small
Poping is an engine problem not upscaling problem...
It's insane...ly disappointing. 🤣
Literal liquid poop software. At least AMD tried.