I love your videos. Could you create a video about the TNV60? I believe it is the new 640 thermal mono. Compared to other brands that use 12 µm with NETD < 25 mK, Mileseey uses 17 µm with NETD < 40 mK. Is there a significant difference? Alternatively, could you make a new video explaining and comparing different thermal specifications? Most thermal videos resemble talk shows or advertisements; we need data and an engineering perspective. Thanks for your content.
Well I was looking at the TNV10 and had it in my cart until I saw this video. With the 300.00 off coupon it made it 1100 all in for what looks to be a great entry unit into the Thermal monoculars scene. Guess I'll find out Friday when it arrives. THANK YOU so much for this review.
I like the presentation of this video very much. Compared with other monoculars, which can only be observed by focusing on the eyesize, such an external display screen really helps my eyes in the dark. In addition a question, what do you think about the clarity between on the screen and when viewed within its scope? It would be better if there were no changes but larger views.
The screen displays the image pretty well. I used the screen about 90% of the time while testing this unit because it was convenient. The eye piece isn’t bad, it looks good internally as well
The point is it’s cheaper. It’s still a 384 base sensor but now coming in around $1300 - $1500. You spending $6k on similar performance is my point, it’s getting more affordable to get into thermal
![[DRIP] ‘BILLIONAIRE’ PREVIEW](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m0eXQD0gIeE/mqdefault.jpg)
They are currently offering a $600 off coupon. I’m so tempted to pull the trigger.
Dang. Definitely a decent thermal for the money then to add to a go bag, or just general purpose use
Keep the content coming.
I plan to!
I love your videos. Could you create a video about the TNV60? I believe it is the new 640 thermal mono. Compared to other brands that use 12 µm with NETD < 25 mK, Mileseey uses 17 µm with NETD < 40 mK. Is there a significant difference? Alternatively, could you make a new video explaining and comparing different thermal specifications? Most thermal videos resemble talk shows or advertisements; we need data and an engineering perspective. Thanks for your content.
Very impressive.
For the money, I thought it was pretty solid
Well I was looking at the TNV10 and had it in my cart until I saw this video. With the 300.00 off coupon it made it 1100 all in for what looks to be a great entry unit into the Thermal monoculars scene. Guess I'll find out Friday when it arrives. THANK YOU so much for this review.
Glad you found it helpful. I think for the money it’s hard to beat
I like the presentation of this video very much. Compared with other monoculars, which can only be observed by focusing on the eyesize, such an external display screen really helps my eyes in the dark. In addition a question, what do you think about the clarity between on the screen and when viewed within its scope? It would be better if there were no changes but larger views.
The screen displays the image pretty well. I used the screen about 90% of the time while testing this unit because it was convenient. The eye piece isn’t bad, it looks good internally as well
Everyone has one today it seems.
More and more people will get this tech as the cost to play comes down!
I spent $6000 on one 8 years ago that isn't much better
The point is it’s cheaper. It’s still a 384 base sensor but now coming in around $1300 - $1500. You spending $6k on similar performance is my point, it’s getting more affordable to get into thermal
Current Amazon price is $1,500 since that didn't make it into the video. I understand it could be varying with time.
I checked 2 days ago when posting and it was shown at $1350, maybe it was a temporary discount. I do mention price in the beginning
The have a coupon right now for $300 off $1350 on Amazon. So $1050.
@@jpk9171jpk wow, even better. Hard to beat
Hi
Hello