The tr3 being so simple in construction it would be much more time efficient body swap if you widened the tr3 shell as they were built for very skinny people
This is going to be an instrastine build👍🏽I've been watching a few of these body swaps. Almost all of them have to impevide have to add some new metal . Y'all will get it done nice car's to start with.
We’ve thought about that, and we might add flares but cutting the SLK down was the best and easiest way AND we get to keep the timeless shape of the triumph
You need to measure in cm and mm. Inches and feet are no way to measure something hi tech as a car build lol. Cant wait to see it finished.. I have an idea you could stretch the triumph Abit to fit
I would suggest widening the body and then stretching the triumphs body by adding the of 7 inches into it by adding four inches between the front tire wheel well and the front door and then add the last three into the door I don't think you would notice much if you do it right well that's my opinion thanks
You need to check out "Randy Schultz, TR3"....in B.C. Canada......If you've never seen a widened TR3 on a tr6 frame with Nissan power, it's worth a look....
hi,i agree with Michael why you don't make the body of the English car fit the Mercedes chassis? wouldn't be easier and you would save the drive engineering maby safer to drive?
I subscribed but here is a suggestion: DON’t TELL US WHAT YOU ARE GOING YO DO. Do the work and describe it as you do it. Waiving arms and pointing at shit dies not cut. It. Sorry for the pun.
This slk230 couldn’t be 2001 SLK. The driver handle is still the 1996-2000 style. I guess this slk is 1999 or up to 01/02/2000. I knew it because I owned five slk’s from 1996-2001.
@@RedWhiteandBoosted I am assuming a new frame a can be designed to take free suspension. And then just moved over. I can't really see the frame and how the drivetrain and exhaust snakes underder the car, but if you narrow the MB frame, won't you need to redo the crossbars, exhaust and transmission/engine mounts? I am assuming you may need to move the MB engine and drivetrain around so that the TR3 body can fit over it. It is dang tight. Basically, I think you will be so tight that it would be easeir to make a new frame to fit the MB components and body than than to cut, jury-rig and shoo horn the existing frame to fit the TR body. Granted, I am just eyeballing it and could therefore be wrong.
What we ended up doing was creating a “frame” from the front and rear subframes of the SLK the mounting points of the body on the tr3, where the fenders bolt on are nearly perfect to the SLK
@@RedWhiteandBoosted Trying to visualize and not doing a good job of it. Sorry. Are you narrowing the front and rear subframes of teh SLK so they do not stick out from the sides of the TR body? If so, don't you have to make new engine mounting points?
Don’t change the shape of the Triumph! I’ve seen too many guys doing chassis swaps and end up cutting up the body. What’s the point of it all if the body doesn’t look the way it was intended? Hack up that Mercedes!
Cool. I’m all in on this build! I’m a restoration carpenter. The best solutions are almost always the hardest ones to do while restraint rules the day. It’s never easy but always enjoyable.
It would have been way easier to make the triump wider and longer then your not throwing a way comfort jus to make this car because if it’s not comfortable at all then your jus making a car that nobody is gonna wanna drive
Just found your channel. This project is rather blasphemous to an LBC lover (little British car). So call me "subscribed"! 😎 I'll be looking at your later vids, maybe you have already touched on this... But have you ever heard of the TR3 "Beta"? It's not the TR3 "B" that eventually ended up being produced alongside early TR4. The Beta was a prototype around 1960 with a wider track and body. Only two copies were built. It was considered a possible replacement for the TR3A, although eventually the Zoom or TR4 design was chosen instead. Essentially the Beta is a TR3A with all four fenders widened an inch, allowing for a wider stance front and rear. The steering gear was also upgraded to the rack & pinion like the TR4 used. There also were several TR3 "Le Mans" cars built and raced around 1958. Those were lengthened chassis and bodies. Trying to fit the SLK and TR3A together, you might want to look into those variations and how they were done. If you end up using the TR3A's frame, there are some known weak areas as well as some strengthening & stiffening tricks that racers used in them. You can find more info online, I'm sure. I've got a TR4 myself (and an extra TR4 frame squirrelled away for a possible "Beta" build, if I can find a body to use).
@@RedWhiteandBoosted RevingtonTR in England has an information sheet on the TR3 Beta, as well as tooling to make the fender panels in aluminum or fiberglass. In fact, they'll build you an entire car if your wallet is fat enough! Neil races one of their Beta replicas himself, plus owns one of the the original cars and is restoring it. If I ever build a Beta, I'll just widen stock steel TR3/3B fenders, same as the factory did. I guess there are some mods to the doors and sills, too, though I don't know the details.
🥲 Mercedes are actually insanely dependable especially their cars without fancy chassis stuff like hydraulic shocks(ABC) or fancy braking systems like SBC, or fancy folding roofs like this car would have had till we rid it of that curse. The drivetrains are on the whole very very robust. Check out the video of our MINISLR or the 300k mile SLK daily driver on our channel
Hi everyone! Thanks for the views and likes! Let me know what you think about the 2nd video!
This is exactly the kind of project I would love to be a part of. I love the idea of making a square peg fit in a round hole!
It's becoming so hard to watch DIY videos, because of so much talking 😮
I've been saying the same for over a year..TOO MUCH DRAMATICS
I agree, just get on with it and stop padding it out.
I usually have my earphones plugged in, but I don’t wear them..
Yeh I also think if you (say) try to fit a mini body shell onto a Mustang floor pan you would also need to do some adjustments..
The tr3 being so simple in construction it would be much more time efficient body swap if you widened the tr3 shell as they were built for very skinny people
seen part 2?
Hell yeah brother! Excited to see this build.
Thanks Joe! I’m sure when it comes time to lift the body we can use your muscle if you’re around!
@@RedWhiteandBoosted you know I'll be there if I can be.
Might be easier to lengthen and widen the triumph to fit the mlk
Totally agree with you..
check out part 2 yet?
This speaks to me, can't wait to see more.
have you seen part 2?
@@RedWhiteandBoosted I haven't had net for a few days so I didn't know part 2 came. But I will watch it thanks.
You two chopped that Benz pretty quick! I would not leave mine parked around you two! LOL!
Wow, that's an ambitious build, good luck. Here in U.K. I have a buddy doing same with a rusty tr3 but it's going onto miata running gear.
I love the challenge of taking something apart that wasn’t designed to come apart.
This is going to be an instrastine build👍🏽I've been watching a few of these body swaps. Almost all of them have to impevide have to add some new metal . Y'all will get it done nice car's to start with.
Great vid guys! Game on!
Appreciate it! We will be posting this coming week!
Planning a similar project. Any chance you still know the slk dash width before you cut into it?
I don’t know the exact
I would also put in my vote to widen the TR body.
Why xont you transplant all running gear & seats etc into triumph cut adjust to fit?
Looking forward to this
Thanks! Been a long time coming! Happy to have Corey on board!
Lots of advice in these comments, just a shame they don’t leave links to their own videos so we can all go watch how it’s done
I would stretch the TR3 body at the rear of the doors. There is room, you may just have to redesign the lines of the doors.
check out part 2!
How about lengthen and widen the triumph a little, plus shorten and narrow the merc a little?
We’ve thought about that, and we might add flares but cutting the SLK down was the best and easiest way AND we get to keep the timeless shape of the triumph
@@RedWhiteandBoosted I agree, keeping the original TR proportions would be much better. Keep going this is going to be epic.
You need to measure in cm and mm. Inches and feet are no way to measure something hi tech as a car build lol. Cant wait to see it finished..
I have an idea you could stretch the triumph Abit to fit
Thanks! check out the next video!
Widen the TR body. Must be nice to have a spare Merc laying around.
why not use a fiberglass kit body?
Looking forward to this project, subscribed.
Ross
Thanks for the sub!
I would suggest widening the body and then stretching the triumphs body by adding the of 7 inches into it by adding four inches between the front tire wheel well and the front door and then add the last three into the door I don't think you would notice much if you do it right well that's my opinion thanks
Why did you not stretch the doors for the TR3?
Ruin the look and we don’t plan on doing much body work
love it
You need to check out "Randy Schultz, TR3"....in B.C. Canada......If you've never seen a widened TR3 on a tr6 frame with Nissan power, it's worth a look....
Oh yes seen that lol! Tremendous amount of work! Remarkable how he achieved such a refined look when adding the middle strip
Where is the next video
In edit right now! Stay tuned!
@@RedWhiteandBoosted Have I missed the next video?
I need a roller tr3 chassis
We’ve got it
Reach out to our Instagram
gonna look good
Thanks! We think so too!
widening and stretching the tr3 may really be your easiest option.
Watch the rest of the series :)
Nice car.
I think so too!
Add 4" to the length of the doors.
Heckkkk no the tr3 is so gorgeous
i got two checked-out s430's of you wamt to do another body swap. both run great but arent worth maintaining. new orleans
Sounds awesome! Let’s link up on Instagram Redwhiteandboosted
hi,i agree with Michael why you don't make the body of the English car fit the Mercedes chassis? wouldn't be easier and you would save the drive engineering maby safer to drive?
Not as sexy, and the way we have strengthened the subframes is far more rigid than Mercedes designed it new
Slk’s never caught on like pagodas.
I subscribed but here is a suggestion: DON’t TELL US WHAT YOU ARE GOING YO DO. Do the work and describe it as you do it. Waiving arms and pointing at shit dies not cut. It. Sorry for the pun.
This slk230 couldn’t be 2001 SLK. The driver handle is still the 1996-2000 style. I guess this slk is 1999 or up to 01/02/2000. I knew it because I owned five slk’s from 1996-2001.
As you can see from the rest of our channel we have had more than 60 r170-172s this is indeed a 2001. But as I’m curious, why do you believe it’s not
God first, Jail second!
Seats please
Roller tr3 chassis for sale
I think it would be quicker and cheaper to build a new custom frame.
How do you figure lol, free vs complete custom suspension/rear end/front end
@@RedWhiteandBoosted
I am assuming a new frame a can be designed to take free suspension. And then just moved over.
I can't really see the frame and how the drivetrain and exhaust snakes underder the car, but if you narrow the MB frame, won't you need to redo the crossbars, exhaust and transmission/engine mounts? I am assuming you may need to move the MB engine and drivetrain around so that the TR3 body can fit over it. It is dang tight.
Basically, I think you will be so tight that it would be easeir to make a new frame to fit the MB components and body than than to cut, jury-rig and shoo horn the existing frame to fit the TR body.
Granted, I am just eyeballing it and could therefore be wrong.
What we ended up doing was creating a “frame” from the front and rear subframes of the SLK the mounting points of the body on the tr3, where the fenders bolt on are nearly perfect to the SLK
@@RedWhiteandBoosted
Trying to visualize and not doing a good job of it. Sorry.
Are you narrowing the front and rear subframes of teh SLK so they do not stick out from the sides of the TR body? If so, don't you have to make new engine mounting points?
You’re going at it the wrong way. Don’t cut the Benz, stretch and widen the triumph
TR3A, just quietly...
Don’t change the shape of the Triumph! I’ve seen too many guys doing chassis swaps and end up cutting up the body. What’s the point of it all if the body doesn’t look the way it was intended? Hack up that Mercedes!
EXACTLY!
100% will not cut up the triumph body. Might flare it or make some wider fenders but the car is gorgeous as is
Cool. I’m all in on this build!
I’m a restoration carpenter. The best solutions are almost always the hardest ones to do while restraint rules the day. It’s never easy but always enjoyable.
Ok….this is the weirdest swap i have ever seen contemplated…..
Hahaha thank you? HAHA
cut the body down the middle and widen it and shorten the chassis
check out part 2!
Rather than shrink the Mercedes’ why not widen the triumph
check out our next video!
It would have been way easier to make the triump wider and longer then your not throwing a way comfort jus to make this car because if it’s not comfortable at all then your jus making a car that nobody is gonna wanna drive
Then we would have a wish.com version of a triumph body 🤣🤣 the SLK in its shortened wheel base rides fantastic
You should have removed the roof first... before you took the doors off
oh?
Just found your channel. This project is rather blasphemous to an LBC lover (little British car). So call me "subscribed"! 😎
I'll be looking at your later vids, maybe you have already touched on this... But have you ever heard of the TR3 "Beta"? It's not the TR3 "B" that eventually ended up being produced alongside early TR4. The Beta was a prototype around 1960 with a wider track and body. Only two copies were built. It was considered a possible replacement for the TR3A, although eventually the Zoom or TR4 design was chosen instead. Essentially the Beta is a TR3A with all four fenders widened an inch, allowing for a wider stance front and rear. The steering gear was also upgraded to the rack & pinion like the TR4 used.
There also were several TR3 "Le Mans" cars built and raced around 1958. Those were lengthened chassis and bodies.
Trying to fit the SLK and TR3A together, you might want to look into those variations and how they were done.
If you end up using the TR3A's frame, there are some known weak areas as well as some strengthening & stiffening tricks that racers used in them. You can find more info online, I'm sure.
I've got a TR4 myself (and an extra TR4 frame squirrelled away for a possible "Beta" build, if I can find a body to use).
I have not heard of this! But of course we own a tr4 and a tr250 also! Thank you for sharing I’ll have a read on them!
@@RedWhiteandBoosted RevingtonTR in England has an information sheet on the TR3 Beta, as well as tooling to make the fender panels in aluminum or fiberglass. In fact, they'll build you an entire car if your wallet is fat enough! Neil races one of their Beta replicas himself, plus owns one of the the original cars and is restoring it.
If I ever build a Beta, I'll just widen stock steel TR3/3B fenders, same as the factory did. I guess there are some mods to the doors and sills, too, though I don't know the details.
Stretch the the other car
Check out part 2!
Merging British and German! Ironic.
There are NO GODS !! ----- Trust me.
Going from a car with reliability issues to a car with reliability issues...
🥲 Mercedes are actually insanely dependable especially their cars without fancy chassis stuff like hydraulic shocks(ABC) or fancy braking systems like SBC, or fancy folding roofs like this car would have had till we rid it of that curse. The drivetrains are on the whole very very robust. Check out the video of our MINISLR or the 300k mile SLK daily driver on our channel
whit bs
I am 4 minutes into this video and nothing has happened. Good bye.
Only lots of talking the first 8 minutes ...
@@chrisridethatbloodything2044 Should I go back and watch the rest of it?
Unfortunately pretty boring